3. Look at the graph's 1959 totals. What does the 4.30 level indicate?
What does the 4.60 indicate?
What does the 1.66 indicate?

Answer:

4. How does Gen Scott attempt to relate to the Cherokee?

Explanation:

In his address to the Cherokee people in 1838, General Winfield Scott attempted to relate to the Cherokee by portraying himself as a friend and ally of the Cherokee people. He acknowledged the difficult situation the Cherokee were facing as they were being forcibly removed from their ancestral lands and urged them to accept the terms of the Treaty of New Echota, which would require them to move westward to Indian Territory.

Scott also attempted to present the forced removal as a humane and necessary measure to protect the Cherokee from violence and retaliation by white settlers who were encroaching on Cherokee lands. He emphasized that the U.S. government was providing assistance and provisions for the Cherokee during the journey, and he assured them that they would be able to build a new home in Indian Territory.

Despite these efforts to relate to the Cherokee, many viewed Scott as a symbol of the oppressive policies of the U.S. government and resented his role in carrying out the forced removal.

Tatum O'Neal is the youngest person ever to win an Academy Award. At the age of 10, she won the Best Supporting Actress award in 1974 for her role in the movie "Paper Moon." She played the role of Addie Loggins, the daughter of a con artist who becomes a father figure to her after her mother's death.

"Paper Moon" was directed by Peter Bogdanovich and starred Tatum O'Neal's father, Ryan O'Neal, in the lead role. Tatum O'Neal's performance in the film was widely praised and she became the youngest person ever to win an Academy Award, a record she still holds to this day. Tatum O'Neal had a promising start to her career, but she struggled with addiction and personal problems as she got older.

She has made occasional appearances in movies and television shows over the years, but she is perhaps best known for her role in "Paper Moon" and for her record-breaking achievement as the youngest Academy Award winner.

For more such questions on Academy Award

https://brainly.com/question/14879214

#SPJ11

In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Marshall Court defined the Indian tribes as sovereign entities in much the same way that Georgia was.

Here is a brief summary of the case.Worcester v. Georgia (1832) is a significant decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court in which it was decided that Cherokee Indian nation had the right to declare themselves a separate, independent nation.

Georgia was outraged by this ruling and ignored the decision by the Supreme Court. Georgia passed legislation that outlawed the Cherokee Nation and placed its citizens under the jurisdiction of the state.

By ignoring the Supreme Court's decision, Georgia had blatantly disregarded the Constitution's supremacy clause, which holds that federal law supersedes state law when the two conflict.

The Supreme Court recognized that Georgia's actions had no legal authority and declared that the Cherokee Nation was a "distinct community" of people, capable of self-governance. In the opinion, the court defined the Indian tribes as sovereign entities in much the same way that Georgia was.

The decision was unanimous, with Chief Justice John Marshall writing the majority opinion. The court declared that the Cherokee Nation was an independent nation within the United States and had the right to make treaties with other countries.

The case marked the beginning of the federal government's policy of Indian removal, which led to the forced relocation of tens of thousands of Indians from the southeastern United States to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma).

TO KNOW ABOUT Worcester v:

https://brainly.com/question/22800339

#SPJ11

The Communist Party controlled artistic expression by creating censorship policies and promoting socialist realism as the only acceptable style of art. This was done to ensure that art served the ideological goals of the party and reflected its values and beliefs.

In particular, the Communist Party in the Soviet Union created strict censorship policies that prohibited the production and distribution of any works of art that were deemed harmful to the interests of the party or the state. This included anything that could be seen as critical of the government, religion, or any other aspect of Soviet society.

Additionally, the party promoted the style of socialist realism, which was an art form that celebrated the achievements of the Communist revolution and the accomplishments of the Soviet state. This style was seen as a means of promoting Soviet propaganda and of presenting an idealized image of the country to the world.

For more such questions on Communist Party, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/3765072

#SPJ11

The probable question may be:

how did the communist party control artistic expression? explain

In the 1930s, Japanese nationalists sought to correct the ill effects of the Great Depression by seizing foreign territories with valuable resources.

During the Great Depression, Japan faced significant economic challenges, including a decrease in exports and a rise in unemployment. To address these issues, Japanese nationalists believed that the country needed to expand its access to resources and markets, which could be achieved through territorial expansion.

In the early 1930s, Japan began to pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which included the invasion and occupation of Manchuria in 1931 and the subsequent establishment of the puppet state of Manchukuo. This was followed by Japan's invasion of China in 1937, which marked the beginning of the Second Sino-Japanese War. These actions were driven in part by a desire to secure access to natural resources and markets in China and other parts of Asia.

Overall, the Japanese nationalists sought to address the economic challenges of the Great Depression by expanding Japan's access to resources and markets through territorial expansion, rather than by negotiating trade agreements, expanding democratic principles, or adopting free-market capitalism.

To learn more about nationalists refer to:

brainly.com/question/15602794

#SPJ4

Some Europeans believed that relinquishing political control of colonies in Asia and Africa during the twentieth century could be beneficial for several reasons. These reasons include Economic Reasons, Ideological Reasons, Nationalism International Relations

1. Economic Reasons: With colonies came the expense of administration and defense, which could be costly. As a result, some people believed that giving up colonies would save money and resources.2. Ideological Reasons: Many Europeans believed that it was their duty to spread their culture, language, and religion to other countries. However, this idea became less popular in the twentieth century, with many people believing that it was not appropriate to impose their ideas on others.3. Nationalism: During the twentieth century, nationalism became increasingly important. People felt more connected to their nation, and some believed that having colonies was a distraction from national unity. In addition, the idea of colonization became increasingly unpopular, with many people believing that it was unfair to exploit other countries for their resources.4. International Relations: The creation of the United Nations and other international organizations meant that there was more cooperation between countries. As a result, some people believed that it was more appropriate for countries to work together rather than one country controlling another.

For more such questions on Europeans

https://brainly.com/question/28774072

#SPJ11

After the end of World War I, the German sphere of influence in China was given to Japan.

The German sphere of influence in China was made up of the Shandong Province and other territories in northern China. Japan fought on the side of the Allies during World War I and was given the right to manage these territories in northern China at the Treaty of Versailles. This infuriated the Chinese, and there were protests all over the country. They were already angry because they had been promised at the Treaty of Versailles that they would regain control of their own country, but Japan's occupation of northern China was seen as an infringement of their sovereignty.

This statement is backed up by answer B

learn more about  World War I here:

https://brainly.com/question/25049423

#SPJ11

President Herbert Hoover believed that the Great Depression could be ended by doing all of the following except lending federal funds to feed farm livestock.Keeping faith in the efficiency of the industrial system, directly assisting businesses and banks were some of his initiatives to end the great depression.

What was the Great Depression?The Great Depression was a severe worldwide economic depression that lasted from 1929 to 1939. The depression began in the United States of America after the stock market crashed on October 24, 1929. Following the crash, the stock prices fell significantly, and many people were left with enormous debts that they could not repay.What were the initiatives taken by President Hoover to end the Great Depression?President Hoover tried to end the Great Depression by taking several initiatives. Some of these initiatives are as follows:Keeping faith in the efficiency of the industrial system, i.e., the Hoover administration believed that the economy would naturally right itself after a period of correction.Directly assisting businesses and banks- Hoover signed the Hawley-Smoot Tariff in June 1930 to protect American manufacturers and farmers from foreign competition. He also supported a series of measures that would provide relief to the banking industry.Lending federal funds- President Hoover authorized the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) to give financial assistance to state and local governments, as well as to banks and other businesses.The only initiative that President Herbert Hoover didn't believe would help end the Great Depression was lending federal funds to feed farm livestock.

for  more questions on  Great Depression

https://brainly.com/question/441267

#SPJ11

President Franklin Pierce  was the only eligible incumbent u.s. president not to be his party nomination for a second term.  It had been widely expected that no important competitor would have the necessary majority, and that the election would end in a deadlock.

Democrats were divided over the issue of slavery as the presidential election neared. President Franklin Pierce had support in his particular region and territory, but struggled to be chosen because he had been out of power for an extensive period and didn't have the support of the entire country. Significant damage was done to Franklin Pierce's reputation with many North the Democrats by his backing for the slave trade in the South.

Learn more on   president

brainly.com/question/20211357

#SPJ4

In 1938, Germany succeeded in Anschluss, or union, with a neighboring country which was strictly against the Treaty of Versailles. The country with which Germany united was Austria.

In 1938, Germany succeeded in Anschluss, or union, with the neighboring country of Austria, which was strictly against the terms outlined in the Treaty of Versailles.

The move sparked international outrage as the Anschluss violated a core clause of the Treaty and was seen as an aggressive attempt by Germany to increase their territorial control in the region. This ultimately set in motion the Second World War, which would end with the complete devastation of Germany and its allies.

To know more about Versailles, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/1800157

#SPJ4

Answer:

. How do you think Cherokee Chief John Ross responded upon receiving this address? What options were available to him?

Explanation:

It is difficult to know for certain how Cherokee Chief John Ross responded upon receiving the address without knowing more specifics about the address in question. However, based on historical context, it is likely that he would have responded with a mixture of frustration, anger, and sadness.

During the mid-1800s, the United States government implemented a policy of Indian removal, which sought to forcibly relocate Native American tribes from their ancestral lands to reservations in other parts of the country. The Cherokee Nation, of which John Ross was the principal chief, was one of the tribes affected by this policy. In 1838, the U.S. government forcibly removed the Cherokee people from their land in what became known as the Trail of Tears.

Given this context, it is likely that any address received by John Ross from the U.S. government would have been seen as an attempt to further erode the sovereignty and autonomy of the Cherokee Nation. Options available to John Ross would have been limited, as the U.S. government had significant military and political power at the time. He could have chosen to resist the government's policies through legal means, such as appealing to the Supreme Court, as the Cherokee Nation had done in previous cases. However, given the history of forced removal and violence against Native American tribes, it is understandable that Ross and other Cherokee leaders would have been skeptical of the U.S. legal system. Alternatively, Ross could have sought to negotiate with the U.S. government for more favorable terms. However, given the power imbalance between the two parties, such negotiations may not have been successful. Ultimately, the options available to John Ross and the Cherokee Nation would have been limited by the larger historical and political context of the time.

True Humans are more closely connected to chimpanzees and bonobos than to gorillas, according to the cladistic theory.

Since the chimpanzee genome was sequenced in 2005, scientists have known that chimpanzees are our closest living cousins because we share 99% of our DNA with them.

The cladistic approach to primate taxonomy is based on the use of morphological and genetic evidence to establish ancestral relationships. The following combination of traits is exclusively seen in primates (including humans), making them unique among all other species. an enormous, complex brain. depth perception is made possible by eyes that are forward-looking and have overlapping fields of vision.

To know more about chimpanzees  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/9470154

#SPJ1

After the British won the french and indian war, a part of the seven years war, they faced significant economic issues due to the costs of the war.

The British encountered various issues, despite their triumph. The economy of the thirteen colonies had taken a severe blow, which was one of the biggest difficulties they encountered after the war.

The British found it difficult to impose and enforce the tax legislation that was passed to help finance the expense of the war. The french and indian war was a critical event in the history of the United States.

The war began in 1754 and concluded in 1763, at the end of the seven years war. It was a battle between the british and french over control of land in North America.

The victory of the british over the french gave the british considerable control over land in the United States. The victory over the french and the gain of more land by the british, however, did not imply that the british could control this land quickly or effectively.

The land had already been colonized by the french, so there was a high demand for development and colonization to take place in these areas. There was an economic problem caused by the conflict's costs, as well as the demand for colonizing the new land, and the expense of protecting it from any enemy threats.

Learn more about the french and indian war: https://brainly.com/question/3223999

#SPJ11

Corinth was a city of commerce primarily due to its location. Corinth is an ancient city that lies between the cities of Athens and Sparta, in the northeastern region of Peloponnese.

Corinth, one of the most flourishing cities of Greece, stood on the Isthmus of Corinth, which connects the Peloponnese to the mainland of Greece.

Cities of ancient Greece were built around important land features such as mountains, sea routes, and rivers, that made them prosperous. Corinth was one of the most prosperous cities in Greece because it was a crossroads for the movement of goods. The geography of the city played an important role in its prosperity.

Corinth was built on the narrow isthmus, which means it was located on a narrow strip of land that connects two larger pieces of land. It was also located between two important seaports, Cenchreae to the east and Lechaeum to the west. The Corinth Canal was constructed in 1893 AD and it is an artificial waterway.

It connected the Saronic Gulf to the Gulf of Corinth and separated the Peloponnese from the rest of Greece. As a city-state, Corinth also had a strong navy, which was important for protecting its trade routes from pirates and raiders.

For such more question on Corinth

https://brainly.com/question/15357521

#SPJ11

The result of the boom in agricultural production of the eighteenth century is: b. People had more money to spend on manufactured goods.

The 18th-century agricultural revolution increased the efficiency and output of farms. Advances in land use and crop rotation, as well as the introduction of new crops from the Americas, such as maize and potatoes, increased yields.

The increase in food production allowed for the growth of the population, as more individuals had access to affordable and dependable nutrition. The increase in food supply also meant that people had more money to spend on manufactured goods.

Farmers who had benefited from the agricultural revolution could now purchase items they previously couldn't afford. As a result, the agricultural revolution resulted in a surge in demand for manufactured goods.

This surge in demand allowed for the growth of the factory system, which enabled the mass production of goods at a lower cost than previously.

To Know more about agricultural production refer here;

https://brainly.com/question/17711566#

#SPJ11

Answer: All of the options are correct. The financial difficulties experienced by the Confederate government during the Civil War had a significant impact on both the military and civilian populations. The government was forced to enact a property tax and issue paper money, which rapidly depreciated in value. As a result, soldiers were not receiving adequate pay and many began deserting, while civilians experienced food shortages and inflation. These conditions led to widespread resentment towards the government and contributed to the eventual defeat of the Confederacy.

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass had to move to Great Britain to escape from being captured as a fugitive slave.

In 1845, Douglass published his autobiography "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave" which became a best-seller and brought him fame in the United States. However, the publication of his book also put him at risk of being recaptured and returned to slavery.

To avoid this, Douglass traveled to Great Britain and Ireland for two years, where he gave lectures and speeches about his experiences as a slave and advocate for abolition. The people of Britain and Ireland were sympathetic to Douglass's cause and raised money to purchase his freedom from his former slave owner.

Find out more on Frederick Douglass at https://brainly.com/question/25670254

#SPJ1

Answer:

A. *politics for the "common man."

The importance of Jacksonian democracy lies in all of its deep contradictions. It managed to be both democratic and anti-democratic at the same time. Which is largely why it has not been a valued governance model since the beginning of it’s end, with the Civil War. The more perduring positive legacy of it would be civic engagement in campaigns, at least; and to a lesser extent, state and local processes and policies. There were serious negative legacies it left, as well.

The high-level theory of Jacksonianism implies a government by, for and of the people. Versus and in contrast to: a government led by aristocracy, oligarchy, elitism, etc. Jackson believed less power in the hands of the latter would insure less corruption, and, more, well, ‘we the people’ -style democracy. It was much about a rejection of the one-(First) party Thomas Jefferson administration that largely limited political power to a limited cohort of East Coast elites. The Jacksonian ‘Second Party’ System sought to break the mold and intentionally engage the ‘common man.’

Most of us learn that democracy is about the fair and equal rights and inputs of all—including, ostensibly, the populist (simply: non-government employed population). The reality was (and remains) that democracies—from the Roman Empire to the British Empire (as well as to many American administrations from both parties, including the current Trump Administration)—often were anything but, in practice, solely or even primarily: ‘for the people.’

From this perspective Jackson’s iteration of democracy was radical—but, only to a point. He wasn’t an extremist. With the most unmistakable evidence he wasn’t being that Jackson—and the whole concept of Jacksonian democracy, was, in truth, a poor model for political equality and equitable power.

Blame it on the times if you like, but, the fact is that by ‘the people’ Jackson really meant only ‘white men.’ All others—Native Americans, Mexicans, blacks, women, etc., were left out in theory and ideology (though some unspoken). and especially in policy and practice—to the point that his Congress had a gag rule against discussion of slave policy.

Beyond those glaringly incongruent exceptions, Jackson was considered a ‘new federalist’ due to his straddle of the federalist system as well as some parts of the anti-federalist paradigms. He was a fan of short term limits, protective of states rights and promoted individual rights. The catch is he also managed to expand the executive/president’s office, reduce the potency of the legislature/Congress, all but failed at ‘draining the swamp’ (other than of his political foes who he hastened to remove in wide swaths and whom he replaced with supporters), endorsed slavery, and pulled in the federal reigns over states during the nullification crisis.

Beyond this all, is a theme abundantly demonstrated in the Donald J. Trump presidency. Jackson was a fan of patronage—appointing your friends and allies to political positions—and, (though it’s unknown if Trump will follow through with this part of it): rotating new ones in after four years, apparently to keep the system fresh.

Keeping this relevant background and context in mind, here are some key features of the Jacksonian doctrine, largely in theory again, not necessarily practice—-

Suffrage/Voting rights

Rhetorically Jackson elevated and espoused the concept of ‘majority’ rule. Towards that end one notable battle he took on was an attempt at the abolishment of the Electoral College, part of representative democracy, with their party-appointed representatives (elector(s)) for each state serving as proxies of sort for ‘the people’s’ presidential vote. Jackson felt the electors and Electoral College process was incongruent with the ‘one (white) man, one vote,’ process of the popular vote/majority rule system.

Manifest Destiny

Jackson wanted to ‘expand freedom’ geographically. This was related to both his agrarian ideals—which he boosted with supporting the distribution of land to individual citizens—and, also to the destruction of first nation Native American tribes, an anti-freedom (for non-whites) policy which led to the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears, both under his watch.

In the spirit of the entitlement ethos known as American exceptionalism (or, more literally: ‘Romantic’ nationalism), Jackson was a proponent of both (white) citizens and the government exploring and taking control of the of the American frontier, beyond the colonized East. The ‘destiny’ part comes from the belief that this was settlers’ God-given right. As though God Him/Herself gave white (male) citizens of the U.S. more favor than the land’s indigenous citizens to the North, West and South.

The winning side of each battle are 1. First Battle of El Alamein: Allied Victory. 2. Operation Torch: Allied Victory. 3. Battle of Tobruk: German Victory. 4. Battle of Tunisia: Allied Victory.

The Battle of El Alamein, which was a turning point in World War II's North African campaign, was fought between 23 October and 4 November 1942. An Axis force commanded by General Georg Stumme attempted to invade Egypt, but it was repulsed by the Allied forces, which were led by General Bernard Montgomery. Allied victory in the Battle of El Alamein was a crucial step toward the eventual defeat of the Axis in North Africa.

Operation Torch was an Allied invasion of French North Africa during World War II that began on November 8, 1942. The operation was a joint effort between the United States and the United Kingdom, and it was aimed at eliminating the Axis forces from North Africa. Despite some initial setbacks, the Allied forces were successful in their efforts, and the Axis forces were pushed out of North Africa.

The Axis powers won the Battle of Tobruk, which took place in Tobruk, Libya, from 10 April to 27 November 1941, during World War II. The battle was fought between German and Italian forces, who were trying to capture the city, and Australian and British forces, who were attempting to hold it. Despite the Allies' best efforts, the Axis forces eventually prevailed and captured Tobruk.

The Battle of Tunisia was a series of battles that took place between November 1942 and May 1943 during World War II. It was fought between the Axis powers (Germany, Italy, and Vichy France) and the Allies (United States, United Kingdom, and Free France). The Allies eventually prevailed, with the last Axis troops surrendering on May 13, 1943.

Note: The question is incomplete. The complete question probably is: Identify the winning side of each battle. Sides: Allied victory and German victory. Battles: First Battle of El Alamein, Operation Torch, Battle of Tobruk, and Battle of Tunisia.

Learn more about Operation Torch:

https://brainly.com/question/1030330

#SPJ11

Despite the fact that he was never found guilty in the case, Judge Hoffman sentenced Seale to four years in prison on November 5, 1969, for 16 charges of contempt, each carrying a three-month term, as a result of his outbursts throughout the trial.

How do people support Bobby Seale during the Chicago trial?

Charles Garry, however, was unwell and was unable to represent Bobby Seale during the trial. Bobby Seale had to be transported to Chicago from California after Judge Hoffman granted Garry's motion to postpone the Black Panther leader's portion of the trial.

The Black Power Movement was a social movement that promoted black people's right to self-advocacy and altered the course of the movement by putting an emphasis on Black power. People's perception that the African American Civil Rights Movement was not succeeding in society also contributed to the social movement.

Learn more about Bobby Seale:

https://brainly.com/question/535887

#SPJ1

The first woman to win a Grand Slam title in tennis is Suzanne Lenglen.

Suzanne Lenglen, nicknamed "La Divine," was a French tennis player who is widely regarded as one of the greatest in history. She is most known for winning the women's singles title at Wimbledon six times between 1919 and 1925.Suzanne Lenglen also won six French Open singles championships in a row from 1920 to 1925. She won 81 consecutive matches before retiring at the age of 27 due to illness.

She revolutionized the sport with her unorthodox style, which included a backhand that was often hit with one hand and a volleying technique that was ahead of its time.Lenglen's career was a significant part of tennis history. She was the first player to have an all-encompassing playing style, as well as the first to wear a skirt that showed her calf muscles, as well as the first to use a metal racquet. Despite the fact that she retired at a young age, she left an indelible impression on the sport of tennis.

For such more questions on grand slam title:

brainly.com/question/27237762

#SPJ11

Answer:

I'm sorry, but I cannot provide a specific response without a passage or context to refer to. Please provide more information or context to help me understand the passage you are referring to.

Explanation:

He thinks there would be a Muslim-Hindu rebellion if all English troops were to withdraw from Indian land, which is used as an illustration of European colonialism in the chapter.

According to the passage in the chapter that discusses European colonization, if the entire English army were to leave Indian territory, there would be an uprising between Muslims and Hindus and chaos would reign throughout the entire nation.

It is clear how much power the British government today wields through the effect they have on Indian politics and economics.

Despite the fact that the country is home to a diverse range of religions, traditions, and customs, Ahmad Khan is outraged and disgusted by the way the administration handles and treats the public.

Learn more about European colonization: https://brainly.com/question/30900919

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences, an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable.

Use the passage below to answer all parts of the question that follows.

"Now, suppose that all the English and the whole English army were to leave India, taking with them all their cannon and their splendid weapons and everything, then who would be rulers of India? Is it possible

that under these circumstances two nations--the Muslims and the Hindus-could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power? Most certainly not.

The aims and objects of the Indian National Congress are based upon an ignorance of history and present-day realities, they do not take into consideration that India is inhabited by different nationalities, they

presuppose that the various religions, castes, and ethnic groups of India can all be treated alike and all of them belong to the same nation. For the successful running of a democratic government, it is essential

that the majority should have the ability to govern not only themselves but also unwilling minorities. I consider the experiment that the Indian National Congress wants to make fraught with dangers and

suffering for all the nationalities of India, but especially for the Muslims. The Congress cannot rationally prove its claim to represent the opinions, ideals, and aspirations of the Muslims."

Syed Ahmad Khan, Indian Muslim educator and political reformer, speech given before the Muslim community of Meerut in northern India, 1888

a) Explain ONE way that the passage illustrates a response to European colonialism

Many canals were built in the darker-shaded states in order to connect C. natural waterways.

Canals were an important mode of transportation in the United States during the 19th century. They were built to connect natural waterways, such as rivers and lakes, and allowed for goods to be transported over longer distances than was possible with river transportation alone. Canals were particularly important for the transportation of heavy goods, such as coal and iron, which were essential for the growth of industry during this time period.

Many canals were built in the darker-shaded states in the map of the United States during the 19th century, including the Erie Canal in New York, the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal in Maryland and Virginia, and the Miami and Erie Canal in Ohio. These canals played a critical role in the economic development of the regions through which they passed, and helped to facilitate the growth of trade and commerce in the United States.

To learn more about canals refer to:

brainly.com/question/27265758

#SPJ4

Statements that specifically describe the communist movement in America are a. Popular Front and its focus on civil liberties helped to create understanding of Americanism. b. The Communist Party sought to ally themselves with socialists

The first statement, that the Popular Front and its focus on civil liberties helped to create a more pluralistic understanding of Americanism," alludes to a political tactic used by the Communist Party USA in the middle of the 1930s in order to advance their political goals by forming alliances with other progressive organisations. The Communist Party stressed its support for civil freedoms as part of this policy, which contributed to the development of a more varied and inclusive conception of American nationality.

The second statement, that during the Popular Front, the Communist Party tried to align itself with socialists and New Dealers," similarly captures the Communist Party's efforts to join forces with other progressive organisations at this time. To further their common objectives of economic justice and social reform, the Communist Party in particular wanted to cooperate with socialists and New Dealers.

Complete Question:

In the mid-1930s, for the first time in American history, the left-an umbrella term for socialists, communists, labor radicals, and many New Deal liberals-enjoyed a shaping influence on the nation's politics and culture. Identify the statements that specifically describe the communist movement in America.

a. The Popular Front and its focus on civil liberties helped to create a more pluralistic understanding of Americanism.

b. The Communist Party sought to ally themselves with socialists and New Dealers during the time of the Popular Front.

c. It prominently features African-Americans, thus demonstrating the Communist Party's commitment to supporting people of all races.

d. It depicts working Americans united under the American and Communist flags, emphasizing the Americanization of the movement.

Read more about the communist movement on:

https://brainly.com/question/26114336

#SPJ4

Answer:

Sometimes parents and grandparents like to recount how difficult life was when they were kids, such as having to walk 10+ miles to school (in the snow, uphill both ways). A random sample of 180 teenagers were selected and 40% had heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids. Do these data provide convincing evidence at an α = 0.05 significance level that the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50? State: Plan: Do: Conclude:

Explanation:

We want to test if the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50.

The significance level is α = 0.05.

The sample size is n = 180 and the proportion of the sample who have heard stories is p = 0.40.

Plan:

We will use a one-sample proportion test.

The null hypothesis is that the true proportion, p, is equal to 0.50.

The alternative hypothesis is that the true proportion, p, is not equal to 0.50.

We will use a significance level of α = 0.05.

Do:

The test statistic is z = (p - P) / sqrt(P * (1 - P) / n), where P is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis.

The observed test statistic is z = (0.40 - 0.50) / sqrt(0.50 * (1 - 0.50) / 180) = -2.47 (rounded to two decimal places).

The p-value is P(Z ≤ -2.47) + P(Z ≥ 2.47) = 2 * P(Z ≤ -2.47) = 0.013 (rounded to three decimal places), where Z is the standard normal distribution.

Since the p-value is less than the significance level of α = 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.

Conclude:

There is convincing evidence at an α = 0.05 significance level that the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50.

Specifically, the sample proportion of 0.40 suggests that the proportion may be lower than 0.50.

We want to test if the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50. The significance level is a 0.05.

The sample size is n 180 and the proportion of the sample who have heard stories is p=0.40. Plan: We will use a one-sample proportion test. The null hypothesis is that the true proportion, p, is equal to 0.50. The alternative hypothesis is that the true proportion, p. is not equal to 0.50 We will use a significance level of a=0.05.

Do: The test statistic is z=(p-P)/sqrt(P(1-P)/n), where P is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis. The observed test statistic is z = (0.40-0.50)/sqrt(0.50 (1-0.50)/180) = -2.47 (rounded to two decimal places). The p-value is P(Z<-247) + P(Z ≥2.47)-2 PZ ≤ 2.47) 0.013 (rounded to three decimal places), where Z is the standard normal distribution. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of a=0.05, we reject the null hypothesis. Conclude: There is convincing evidence at an a = 0.05 significance level that the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50.

Specifically, the sample proportion of 0.40 suggests that the proportion may be lower than 0.50.

Learn more about level, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13947717

#SPJ2

Prostitution in the united states reached its peak throughout the late nineteenth century, specially in city areas with massive populations of single, immigrant guys.

The rise of industrialization, urbanization, and migration brought about a shift in gender roles and the breakdown of conventional family systems, growing a market for commercial sex.

Prostitution was tolerated and regulated by means of the authorities in lots of cities, and brothels operated openly. however, the practice was additionally stigmatized and associated with vice, disorder, and immorality, leading to campaigns for its abolition.

The modern era noticed the passage of legal guidelines that criminalized prostitution and empowered law enforcement to crack down on it, however the alternate persisted underground and persisted to be a significant social difficulty.

Learn more about Prostitution In USA:-

https://brainly.com/question/14307325

#SPJ4

Many people in the United States wanted America to become a colonial power at the end of the 19th century because of several reasons. This includes the belief in the idea of manifest destiny, the need for new markets, and the desire to spread American values and culture.Manifest Destiny is the idea that the United States is destined to expand its territory from coast to coast. This idea was especially popular among religious groups, who saw expansion as a way to spread Christianity.

Supporters of this idea believe that the US has a right to spread its values and institutions throughout the world. As a result, many Americans saw overseas expansion as a natural extension of manifest destiny.New MarketsAt the end of the 19th century, many American businesses were looking for new markets for their goods. The United States had a surplus of goods, and manufacturers needed new markets to sell their products. Many people saw overseas expansion as a way to open up new markets for American goods.Spread American Values and CultureLastly, some Americans saw overseas expansion as an opportunity to spread American values and culture. Many people believed that American culture was superior to other cultures and that it was the duty of the United States to spread its values and institutions throughout the world. This idea was especially popular among religious groups, who saw expansion as a way to spread Christianity.

For more such questions on United States

https://brainly.com/question/4428758

#SPJ11

The War of 1812 was fought between the United States and Great Britain. Those who opposed the war included Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton, while those who favored it included John Adams and Henry Clay. The Treaty of Ghent was the basis for the peace concluded at the end of the war.

The War of 1812 was fought along the US-Canadian border, the Great Lakes, and the Atlantic coast. The British forces had some victories, including the burning of Washington D.C. However, the US forces won some significant battles, including the Battle of New Orleans, led by Andrew Jackson.

The Treaty of Ghent was signed on December 24, 1814, in Ghent, Belgium. The treaty ended the War of 1812 and restored the status quo ante bellum. In other words, it returned the relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom to what it was before the war. However, some issues, such as impressment and trade disputes, were not resolved in the treaty.

Learn more about the War of 1812 at https://brainly.com/question/14301560

#SPJ11