A circular bracelet has a radius of
5cm

The approximate wavelength of the light can be calculated using the formula λ = dsinθ, where λ is the wavelength, d is the spacing between the lines on the diffraction grating, and θ is the diffraction angle.

In this case, the diffraction grating has 250.0 lines per mm and the second-order dark band forms a diffraction angle of 15.0°. Using the formula, the approximate wavelength is determined to be 518 nm.

The formula for calculating the wavelength of light diffracted by a grating is λ = dsinθ, where λ is the wavelength, d is the spacing between the lines on the grating, and θ is the diffraction angle. In this case, the diffraction grating has a spacing of 1/d = 1/250.0 mm. The second-order dark band forms a diffraction angle of θ = 15.0°. Plugging these values into the formula, we get λ = (1/250.0 mm) * sin(15.0°).

To ensure consistent units, we can convert the spacing to meters: d = 1/250.0 mm = 0.004 mm = 0.004 * [tex]10^-3[/tex] m. Plugging the values into the formula, we have λ = (0.004 * [tex]10^-3[/tex] m) * sin(15.0°). Evaluating this expression, the approximate wavelength is found to be 518 nm.

Therefore, the correct answer is D) 518 nm.

Learn more about expression here:

https://brainly.com/question/28170201

#SPJ11

a) UPS would charge $7 to mail a 2-pound package, while FedEx would charge $6.

b) The two companies will charge the same amount for a 4-pound package.

c) UPS charges less for a 6-pound package, and by choosing UPS, you would save $12 - $11 = $1.

a) To calculate the cost for each company to mail a 2-pound package, we can use the given information:

UPS charges an initial $5 fee and an additional $1 for each pound shipped. For a 2-pound package, the cost would be:

Initial fee: $5

Additional cost for 2 pounds: 2 pounds × $1/pound = $2

Total cost for UPS: $5 + $2 = $7

FedEx charges an initial $3 fee and an additional $1.50 for each pound shipped. For a 2-pound package, the cost would be:

Initial fee: $3

Additional cost for 2 pounds: 2 pounds × $1.50/pound = $3

Total cost for FedEx: $3 + $3 = $6

So, UPS would charge $7 to mail a 2-pound package, while FedEx would charge $6.

b) To find the weight at which the two companies charge the same amount, we need to set up an equation and solve for the weight. Let's represent the weight in pounds as 'w':

Cost for UPS: $5 + $1× w

Cost for FedEx: $3 + $1.50× w

Setting the two costs equal to each other:

$5 + $1 × w = $3 + $1.50× w

Rearranging the equation:

$1 × w - $1.50 × w = $3 - $5

-$0.50 × w = -$2

w = -$2 / (-$0.50)

w = 4

Therefore, the two companies will charge the same amount for a 4-pound package.

c) To determine which company charges less for a 6-pound package, we can calculate the costs for each company:

UPS charges an initial fee of $5 and an additional $1 for each pound shipped. For a 6-pound package, the cost would be:

Initial fee: $5

Additional cost for 6 pounds: 6 pounds× $1/pound = $6

Total cost for UPS: $5 + $6 = $11

FedEx charges an initial fee of $3 and an additional $1.50 for each pound shipped. For a 6-pound package, the cost would be:

Initial fee: $3

Additional cost for 6 pounds: 6 pounds × $1.50/pound = $9

Total cost for FedEx: $3 + $9 = $12

Therefore, UPS charges less for a 6-pound package, and by choosing UPS, you would save $12 - $11 = $1.

Learn more about Total cost here:

https://brainly.com/question/26367109

#SPJ11

The surface area of the rectangular prism is 18 square cm

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

1 cm by 1 cm by 4 cm

The surface area of the rectangular prism is calculated as

Surface area = 2 * (Length * Width + Length * Height + Width * Height)

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Area = 2 * (1 * 1 + 1 * 4 + 1 * 4)

Evaluate

Area = 18

Hence, the area is 18 square cm

Read more about surface area at

brainly.com/question/26403859

#SPJ1

1/cos290 (in the fourth quadrant)  in terms of the secant of a positive acute angle.

To write sec290 in terms of the secant of a positive acute angle, we need to find an equivalent angle that is between 0 and 90 degrees. We can do this by subtracting 360 degrees (one full revolution) from 290 degrees, which gives us:

290 - 360 = -70

Now we have an equivalent angle of -70 degrees, which is not a positive acute angle. However, we know that the secant function is positive in the first and fourth quadrants, so we can find an angle in one of those quadrants that has the same secant value as -70 degrees.

Let's consider the fourth quadrant, where angles are between 270 and 360 degrees. We can find an angle in this quadrant that has the same secant value as -70 degrees by taking the reciprocal of the secant function, which gives us:

sec(-70) = 1/cos(-70) = 1/cos(360-70) = 1/cos290

So sec290 (where the angle is measured in degrees) can be written in terms of the secant of a positive acute angle as:

sec290 = 1/cos(290) = sec(-70) = 1/cos290 (in the fourth quadrant)

Learn more about acute angle

brainly.com/question/10334248

#SPJ11

Thus, the derivative of the function using quotient rule of differentiation:  dr/d theta = -cos theta (csc^2 theta + 1).

To find dr/d theta for r = cos theta cot theta, we need to use the product rule of differentiation.

r = cos theta cot theta
r = cos theta (cos theta / sin theta)
r = cos^2 theta / sin theta

Now we can use the quotient rule of differentiation:

dr/d theta = (sin theta (-2cos theta sin theta) - cos^2 theta (cos theta)) / (sin^2 theta)
dr/d theta = (-2cos theta sin^2 theta - cos^3 theta) / sin^2 theta
dr/d theta = -cos theta (2sin^2 theta + cos^2 theta) / sin^2 theta
dr/d theta = -cos theta (cos^2 theta + 2sin^2 theta) / sin^2 theta

Using the trig identity sin^2 theta + cos^2 theta = 1, we can simplify further:

dr/d theta = -cos theta (1 + sin^2 theta) / sin^2 theta
dr/d theta = -cos theta (csc^2 theta + 1)

Therefore, the correct answer is B. dr/d theta = -cos theta (csc^2 theta + 1).

Know more about the quotient rule of differentiation

https://brainly.com/question/29232553

#SPJ11

The revised biconditional statement is “A quadrilateral has four right angles if and only if it is a square”. This is true because any quadrilateral with four right angles will always be a square. Hence, the revised biconditional statement is valid.

The statement “A quadrilateral is a square if and only if it has four right angles” is a biconditional statement. A biconditional statement is a combination of two conditionals connected by the phrase “if and only if”.For a biconditional statement to be valid, both the conditional statements should be true. In the given biconditional statement, “a quadrilateral is a square if it has four right angles” is true.

However, the statement “a quadrilateral with four right angles is a square” is not always true. This is because there are other quadrilaterals that have four right angles but are not squares.To make the given biconditional statement valid, we need to rewrite the second conditional statement so that it is also true.

This can be done by using the converse of the first conditional statement.

Therefore, the revised biconditional statement is “A quadrilateral has four right angles if and only if it is a square”. This is true because any quadrilateral with four right angles will always be a square. Hence, the revised biconditional statement is valid.

Know more about biconditional here,

https://brainly.com/question/27738859

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The degree of the polynomial7m¹⁶n¹¹ is 27.

A polynomial is an algebraic expression consisting of variables and coefficients.

The degree of a polynomial is the highest degree of any of its terms.

In the given expression, the term is 7m¹⁶n¹¹;

This term consists of two variables, m and n, raised to exponents 16 and 11 respectively. The coefficient of this term is 7.

The degree of a term in a polynomial is the sum of the exponents of the variables in that term.

degree = exponent of m + exponent of n

= 16 + 11

Learn more about degree of polynomial here: https://brainly.com/question/1600696

#SPJ1

The line integral of f(x,y,z) = xyz² over the curve c is approximately equal to 91.058.

The line integral of the given function f(x,y,z) = xyz² over the curve c can be expressed as:

∫c f(x,y,z) ds = ∫[a,b] f(r(t)) ||r'(t)|| dt

Now we can calculate r'(t):

r'(t) = (2, 1, 3)

||r'(t)|| = ✓(2² + 1² + 3²) = sqrt(14)

∫c f(x,y,z) ds = ∫[0,1] (x(t) * y(t) * z(t)²) * ✓(14) dt

∫c f(x,y,z) ds = ∫[0,1] (-3 + 2t) * (6 + t) * (3t)² * ✓(14) dt

Simplifying and integrating, we get:

∫c f(x,y,z) ds = 9✓(14) ∫[0,1] (216t × 216t⁴ - 81t⁴ - 12t³) dt

∫c f(x,y,z) ds = 9✓(14) * (43/20) = 91.058

Learn more about integral on

https://brainly.com/question/27419605

#SPJ1

The total number of ways to select 22 chocolates from the 3 varieties, buying at least 2 of the 5 bittersweet chocolates and with only 7 milk chocolates available, is

[tex]${5\choose2} \times {17\choose20} + {5\choose3} \times {16\choose19} + {5\choose4} \times {15\choose18} + {5\choose5} \times {14\choose17} + {7\choose17}$[/tex]

To solve this problem, we can use the combinations formula. We will need to consider two cases: one where we select 2 or more bittersweet chocolates, and another where we select all 5 bittersweet chocolates.

Case 1: Selecting 2 or more bittersweet chocolates

First, we select 2 bittersweet chocolates out of the 5 available, and then we select the remaining 20 chocolates from the 3 varieties, excluding the 2 bittersweet chocolates we have already selected. This gives us:

[tex]${5\choose2} \times {17\choose20}$[/tex] ways to select the chocolates.

Next, we select 3 bittersweet chocolates out of the 5 available, and then we select the remaining 19 chocolates from the 3 varieties, excluding the 3 bittersweet chocolates we have already selected. This gives us:

${5\choose3} \times {16\choose19}$ ways to select the chocolates.

Continuing in this way, we can select 4 or 5 bittersweet chocolates and then select the remaining chocolates from the other varieties. The total number of ways to do this is:

[tex]${5\choose2} \times {17\choose20} + {5\choose3} \times {16\choose19} + {5\choose4} \times {15\choose18} + {5\choose5} \times {14\choose17}$[/tex]

Case 2: Selecting all 5 bittersweet chocolates

In this case, we only need to select 17 chocolates from the other varieties, since we have already selected all 5 bittersweet chocolates. This gives us:

[tex]${7\choose17}$[/tex] ways to select the chocolates.

So, the total number of ways to select 22 chocolates from the 3 varieties, buying at least 2 of the 5 bittersweet chocolates and with only 7 milk chocolates available, is:

[tex]${5\choose2} \times {17\choose20} + {5\choose3} \times {16\choose19} + {5\choose4} \times {15\choose18} + {5\choose5} \times {14\choose17} + {7\choose17}$[/tex]

Learn more about bittersweet here

https://brainly.com/question/28291873

#SPJ11

We can calculate the total number of ways by summing up the results from each case:

Total number of ways = (1 * 3^20) + (1 * 3^19) + (1 * 3^18)

To determine the number of ways to select 22 chocolates from 3 varieties with the given constraints, we can break down the problem into cases:

Case 1: Selecting 2 bittersweet chocolates

In this case, we need to select 20 more chocolates from the remaining varieties. Since we must buy at least 2 bittersweet chocolates, there are 3 possibilities for the selection of the remaining chocolates:

18 chocolates from the remaining varieties (no milk chocolates)

17 chocolates from the remaining varieties and 1 milk chocolate

16 chocolates from the remaining varieties and 2 milk chocolates

Case 2: Selecting 3 bittersweet chocolates

In this case, we need to select 19 more chocolates from the remaining varieties. There are again 3 possibilities for the selection of the remaining chocolates:

17 chocolates from the remaining varieties (no milk chocolates)

16 chocolates from the remaining varieties and 1 milk chocolate

15 chocolates from the remaining varieties and 2 milk chocolates

Case 3: Selecting 4 bittersweet chocolates

In this case, we need to select 18 more chocolates from the remaining varieties. There are 3 possibilities for the selection of the remaining chocolates:

16 chocolates from the remaining varieties (no milk chocolates)

15 chocolates from the remaining varieties and 1 milk chocolate

14 chocolates from the remaining varieties and 2 milk chocolates

Now, let's calculate the number of ways for each case:

Case 1: Selecting 2 bittersweet chocolates

There is only 1 way to select the 2 bittersweet chocolates since we must buy at least 2 of them. For the remaining 20 chocolates, we have 3 possibilities for each chocolate (from the remaining varieties or milk chocolates). So, the total number of ways for this case is 1 * 3^20.

Case 2: Selecting 3 bittersweet chocolates

There is only 1 way to select the 3 bittersweet chocolates. For the remaining 19 chocolates, we have 3 possibilities for each chocolate. So, the total number of ways for this case is 1 * 3^19.

Case 3: Selecting 4 bittersweet chocolates

There is only 1 way to select the 4 bittersweet chocolates. For the remaining 18 chocolates, we have 3 possibilities for each chocolate. So, the total number of ways for this case is 1 * 3^18.

Know more about constraints here:

https://brainly.com/question/30703729

#SPJ11

The name for the decimal value of the point "m" on the number line is determined by the position of the point relative to the nearest whole numbers.

On a number line, each point represents a specific value. The name for a decimal value depends on its position relative to the nearest whole numbers. If the point "m" falls between two whole numbers, it is referred to as a decimal value.

For example, if "m" falls between 3 and 4 on the number line, its decimal value would be represented as 3.m or 3.m0, where "m" represents the specific decimal digit. The decimal value can be determined by measuring the distance between "m" and the nearest whole numbers and expressing it as a fraction or a decimal digit.

If "m" falls exactly on a whole number, then it is not considered a decimal value. For instance, if "m" coincides with point 5 on the number line, it is simply referred to as the whole number 5, without any decimal component. However, if "m" falls between two whole numbers, it signifies a specific decimal value determined by its position on the number line.

Learn more about whole numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/29766862

#SPJ11

Therefore, the height of the cup is approximately 21.97 inches.

To find the height of a cone-shaped cup, given its volume and radius, we can use the formula for the volume of a cone:

V = (1/3)πr²h

where V is the volume, r is the radius, h is the height, and π is the constant pi.

We can solve for h by rearranging the formula as:

h = 3V/(πr²)

Given that the cup has a volume of 23 cubic inches and a radius of 1 inch, we can substitute these values into the formula:

h = 3(23)/(π(1)²)

h ≈ 21.97

We can round this answer to the nearest hundredth to get:

height ≈ 21.97 inches

To know more about cone-shaped visit:

https://brainly.com/question/808471

#SPJ11

There are several geometric shapes that have exactly four pairs of perpendicular sides. Some examples include rectangles, squares, rhombuses, and parallelograms.

1. Rectangle: A rectangle is a quadrilateral with four right angles, making all four sides perpendicular to each other.

2. Square: A square is a special type of rectangle with all sides of equal length. Since all angles in a square are right angles, all four sides are perpendicular.

3. Rhombus: A rhombus is a quadrilateral with all sides of equal length. Its opposite sides are parallel and all four angles are right angles, making it have four pairs of perpendicular sides.

4. Parallelogram: A parallelogram is a quadrilateral with opposite sides parallel. If it has adjacent sides that are perpendicular, then it will have four pairs of perpendicular sides.

These are just a few examples of geometric shapes with four pairs of perpendicular sides. There are other shapes as well, such as certain trapezoids and kites, that can also have this property depending on their specific attributes.

Learn more about quadrilateral here:

https://brainly.com/question/29934440

#SPJ11

The mean area for these states is approximately 157,971 square miles, and the median area is 104,400 square miles.

To get the mean and median area for these states, you'll need to follow these steps:
Organise the data in ascending order:
6,000; 52,300; 53,400; 104,400; 114,600; 159,000; 615,100
Calculate the mean area (sum of all areas divided by the number of states)
Mean = (6,000 + 52,300 + 53,400 + 104,400 + 114,600 + 159,000 + 615,100) / 7
Mean = 1,105,800 / 7
Mean ≈ 157,971 square miles (rounded to the nearest integer)
Calculate the median area (the middle value of the ordered data)
There are 7 states, so the median will be the area of the 4th state in the ordered list.
Median = 104,400 square miles
So, the mean area for these states is approximately 157,971 square miles, and the median area is 104,400 square miles.

Lean more about median here, https://brainly.com/question/26177250

#SPJ11

The Bodmas rule states that we have to solve the operations that are in brackets first, then we have to solve the operations of division and multiplication from left to right, and finally we have to solve the operations of addition and subtraction from left to right.

Given that `(5+3)j = 48`.To find the value of j, we can follow the below steps;`

8j = 48` Dividing both sides by

8. `j = 6`

Therefore, the value of j that makes `(5+3)j=48` a true statement is 6.

Hence, the correct answer is `6`.

Note: Here, we have multiplied `5+3` first, then multiplied with j, as we need to apply the BODMAS rule to solve the given equation.

To know more about the BODMAS rule, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29795897

#SPJ11

the solution to the recurrence relation an = 3an−1 (n ≥1) with initial condition a0 = 5 is an = 3^n * 5 for all n ≥ 0.

Given the recurrence relation an = 3an−1 (n ≥1) with initial condition a0 = 5, we can find a general formula for an using mathematical induction.

First, we find the first few terms of the sequence: a0 = 5, a1 = 3a0 = 15, a2 = 3a1 = 45, a3 = 3a2 = 135, and so on. From these terms, we can see that an = 3^n * a0 for all n ≥ 0.

We can prove this by mathematical induction. For the base case, we have a0 = 3^0 * a0, which is true.

For the sequence step, assume that an = 3^n * a0 for some value of n. Then, we have:

an+1 = 3an = 3^(n+1) * a0

Therefore, an = 3^n * a0 for all n ≥ 0.

Using this formula, we can find the value of any term in the sequence. For example, the value of a4 is:

a4 = 3^4 * a0 = 3^4 * 5 = 405

To learn more about sequence visit:

brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11

It would have taken the two companies approximately 10.92 years to drill the tunnel.

The Loetschberg tunnel was built to connect Bern, Switzerland, with the ski resorts in the southern Swiss Alps. The construction of the tunnel was accomplished by two engineering companies that started at the north end and the south end, respectively. If the company at the north end could drill the entire tunnel in 22.2 years, and the south company could do it in 21.8 years, we can calculate the length of time required for the two companies to drill the tunnel.To calculate the time required for the two companies to drill the tunnel, we can use the following formula:Time = (AB)/(A+B)where A is the time required by the first company, and B is the time required by the second company, and AB is the product of A and B.Using this formula, we can calculate the time required for the two companies to drill the tunnel as follows:Time = (22.2 × 21.8) / (22.2 + 21.8)= 480.36 / 44= 10.92 yearsTherefore, it would have taken the two companies approximately 10.92 years to drill the tunnel.

Learn more about Approximate here,what is to find an approximate value for a number is called?

https://brainly.com/question/201331

#SPJ11

By long division method 21046 has a square root of 144.9.

Here is one way to find the square root of 21046 by division method:

    4 8 .

21║504

    4 8

    135

     128

      48 4

210║746

       16 8

        584

        560

        246

         210

         4842  

2104║6

          168  

         426

         420  

           6

The final remainder is 6, which means that the square root of 21046 is approximately 144.9 (to one decimal place).

Therefore, the square root of 21046 by division method is approximately 144.9.

Find out more on long division here: https://brainly.com/question/30059812

#SPJ1

The Total area of the quadrilateral is:  90 cm²

Using Pythagorean theorem, we can find the length of the side EG a:

EG = √(10² + 11²)

EG = √221

Similarly, with Pythagorean theorem we have:

EF = √(√221)² - 5²

EF = √(221 - 25)

EF = 14

The area of triangle EFG is:

Area = ¹/₂ * 5 * 14

= 35 cm²

Area of Triangle EGH = ¹/₂ * 11 * 10

= 55 cm²

Total area of quadrilateral = 35 cm² + 55 cm²

Total area of quadrilateral = 90 cm²

Read more about Area of Quadrilateral at: https://brainly.com/question/27991573

#SPJ1

To evaluate the telescoping series or state whether it diverges, we examine the series Σ(8¹/ⁿ - 8¹/ⁿ⁺¹). The series converges.


First, we find a general term for the series. Let T(n) = 8¹/ⁿ - 8¹/ⁿ. We can rewrite this as T(n) = 8¹/ⁿ*(1 - 8⁻¹/ⁿ⁽ⁿ⁺¹⁾).

Next, observe that the series is telescoping, meaning consecutive terms cancel each other out. Specifically, T(1) - T(2) = 8¹ - 8¹/², T(2) - T(3) = 8¹/² - 8¹/³, and so on.

We notice that each term cancels the subsequent term's second part, leaving only the first part of the first term (8¹) and the second part of the last term (8¹/ⁿ⁺¹). The sum of the series is then 8 - 8¹/ⁿ⁺¹.

As n approaches infinity, 8¹/ⁿ approaches 1. Therefore, the limit of the sum is 8 - 1 = 7. So, the series converges, and the sum is 7.

To know more about  telescoping series click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/14523424#

#SPJ11

Jessica deposited $3,500 into a retirement account and earned 3.5% annual simple interest. At the end of 7 years, the amount of interest earned on her retirement account is $857.50.

To calculate the amount of interest earned on Jessica's retirement account, we can use the formula for simple interest:

Interest = Principal × Rate × Time.

In this case, the principal amount (P) is $3,500, the rate (R) is 3.5%, and the time (T) is 7 years. Plugging these values into the formula, we have:

Interest = $3,500 × 3.5% × 7

        = $3,500 × 0.035 × 7

        = $857.50

Therefore, the amount of interest earned on Jessica's retirement account at the end of 7 years is $857.50.

Learn more about interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/25663053

#SPJ11

Thus, the sum of the series is 77. Answer: The sum of the series is 77. This answer contains a long answer that has 250 words.

To find the sum of the series (-2) + (-5) + (-8) + ... + (-20), we need to determine the number of terms in the series, and then use the formula for the sum of an arithmetic series,

which is S_n = (n/2)(a_1 + a_n), where S_n is the sum of the first n terms of the series, a_1 is the first term, a_n is the nth term, and n is the number of terms in the series. Here, a_1 = -2, and the common difference, d = -5 - (-2) = -3, so a_n = a_1 + (n-1)d = -2 + (n-1)(-3) = -2 - 3n + 3 = 1 - 3n.

We need to find n such that a_n = -20, which gives 1 - 3n = -20, or 3n = 21, or n = 7.

Therefore, there are 7 terms in the series. Using the formula, S_7 = (7/2)(-2 + (-20)) = (-7)(-22/2) = 77.

Thus, the sum of the series is 77. Answer: The sum of the series is 77.

This answer contains a long answer that has 250 words.

To know more about common difference visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28584885

#SPJ11

The graph of the polynomial equation is y = -x² - 11x - 30

Given data ,

Let the polynomial equation be represented as A

Now , the value of A is

y = -x² - 11x - 30

To find the x-intercepts, we need to set y = 0 in the equation and solve for x. We have -x² - 11x - 30 = 0

On factoring this equation, we get (-x - 6)(x + 5) = 0.

Therefore, the x-intercepts are -6 and 5

And , the y-intercept is at the point (0, -30)

Hence , the equation of graph is plotted and y = -x² - 11x - 30

To learn more about equation of graph of polynomials click :

https://brainly.com/question/16957172

#SPJ1

The function f(x) satisfying the given conditions is:

f'(x) = 5,

f(x) = 5x - 16.

To find the function f(x) satisfying the given conditions, we need to integrate f''(x) = 0 twice.

Since f''(x) = 0, integrating once gives us f'(x) = c1, where c1 is a constant of integration.

Given that f'(4) = 5, we can substitute this value into the equation:

c1 = 5.

Integrating f'(x) = 5 gives us f(x) = 5x + c2, where c2 is another constant of integration.

Given that f(3) = -1, we can substitute this value into the equation:

5(3) + c2 = -1,

15 + c2 = -1,

c2 = -16.

Know more about function f(x) here;

https://brainly.com/question/13461298

#SPJ11

The partial fraction decomposition of 40/x² - 4 can be written as f(x)/(x-2) + g(x)/(x+2), where f(x) = -10/(x-2) and g(x) = 10/(x+2).

To find the partial fraction decomposition, we first factor the denominator as (x-2)(x+2) and then use the method of partial fractions.

We write 40/(x² - 4) as A/(x-2) + B/(x+2) and then solve for A and B by equating the numerators. Simplifying and solving the equations, we get A = -10 and B = 10. Therefore, the partial fraction decomposition of 40/(x² - 4) is -10/(x-2) + 10/(x+2).

To understand this better, let's look at what partial fraction decomposition means. It is a technique used to break down a fraction into simpler fractions whose denominators are easier to handle. In this case, we have a fraction with a quadratic denominator, which is difficult to work with.

By breaking it down into two simpler fractions with linear denominators, we can more easily integrate or perform other operations. The coefficients in the partial fraction decomposition can be found by equating the numerators and solving for the unknowns.

To know more about partial fraction decomposition click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30894807#

#SPJ11

The required answer is , the particle's position at time t = 9 seconds is 15 meters along the x-axis.

To find the particle's position at time t = 9 seconds, given the velocity function v(t) = √(9 - t) and the initial position s(0) = 9, we need to integrate the velocity function and then use the initial condition to find the position function s(t).

Step 1: Integrate the velocity function
∫v(t) dt = ∫√(9 - t) dt
We also known the initial position of the particle = 9
Step 2: Use substitution method
Let u = 9 - t, then du = -dt
           So, the integral becomes: -∫√u du
Step 3: Integrate
-∫√u du = -2/3 * u^(3/2) + C = -2/3 (9 - t)^(3/2) + C
Step 4: Find the constant C using the initial condition s(0) = 9
9 = -2/3 (9 - 0)^(3/2) + C
C = 9 + 6 = 15
Step 5: Write the position function s(t)
s(t) = -2/3 (9 - t)^(3/2) + 15
Step 6: Find the position at time t = 9 seconds
s(9) = -2/3 (9 - 9)^(3/2) + 15 = 15

Therefore, the position function of the particle is: s(t) = -2/3(9-t)^(3/2) + 15 Plugging in t = 9, we get: s(9) = -2/3(9-9)^(3/2) + 15 s(9) = 15 So the particle's position at time t = 9 seconds , 15 meters.

So, the particle's position at time t = 9 seconds is 15 meters along the x-axis.

To know more about function. Click on the link.

https://brainly.com/question/21145944

#SPJ11

To calculate the total number of ways in which the committee of 3 women and 2 men can be formed from a pool of 11 women and 7 men, we can use the combination formula. The combination formula is C(n, r) = n! / (r! * (n-r)!) where n is the total number of items and r is the number of items to choose.

First, we'll calculate the number of ways to select 3 women from a pool of 11 women:
C(11, 3) = 11! / (3! * (11-3)!)
C(11, 3) = 11! / (3! * 8!)
C(11, 3) = 165

Next, we'll calculate the number of ways to select 2 men from a pool of 7 men:
C(7, 2) = 7! / (2! * (7-2)!)
C(7, 2) = 7! / (2! * 5!)
C(7, 2) = 21

Now, to find the total number of ways in which the committee can be formed, we'll multiply the number of ways to choose women and the number of ways to choose men:
Total number of ways = 165 (ways to choose women) * 21 (ways to choose men)
Total number of ways = 3,465

Therefore, the total number of ways in which the committee can be formed is 3,465 (Option A).

To Know more about number of ways refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29110744#

#SPJ11

The vectors v = -2i - 3j and w = 2i + j are neither parallel nor orthogonal to each other.

To determine whether the vectors v = 3i + j and w = i - 3j are parallel, orthogonal, or neither, we can calculate their dot product:

v · w = (3i + j) · (i - 3j) = 3i · i + j · i - 3j · 3j = 3 - 9 = -6

Since the dot product is not zero, the vectors are not orthogonal. To determine if they are parallel, we can calculate the magnitudes of the vectors:

[tex]|v| = \sqrt{(3^2 + 1^2)} = \sqrt{10 }[/tex]

[tex]|w| = \sqrt{(1^2 + (-3)^2) } = \sqrt{10 }[/tex]

Since the magnitudes are equal, the vectors are parallel.

To find the angle between u = 4j and v = 2i + 5j, we can use the dot product formula:

u · v = |u| |v| cosθ

where θ is the angle between the vectors.

Solving for θ, we get:

[tex]\theta = \cos^{-1} ((u . v) / (|u| |v|)) = \cos^{-1}((0 + 20) / \sqrt{16 } \sqrt{29} )) \approx 47.2$^{\circ}$[/tex]

So the angle between u and v is approximately 47.2 degrees.

To decompose v = (2i + 5j) into two vectors v₁ and v₂ where v₁ is parallel to w = (i - 3j) and v₂ is orthogonal to w, we can use the projection formula:

v₁ = ((v · w) / (w · w)) w

v₂ = v - v₁

First, we calculate the dot product of v and w:

v · w = (2i + 5j) · (i - 3j) = 2i · i + 5j · i - 2i · 3j - 15j · 3j = -19

Then we calculate the dot product of w with itself:

w · w = (i - 3j) · (i - 3j) = i · i - 2i · 3j + 9j · 3j = 10

Using these values, we can find v₁:

v₁ = ((v · w) / (w · w)) w = (-19 / 10) (i - 3j) = (-1.9i + 5.7j)

To find v₂, we subtract v₁ from v:

v₂ = v - v₁ = (2i + 5j) - (-1.9i + 5.7j) = (3.9i - 0.7j)

So v can be decomposed into v₁ = (-1.9i + 5.7j) and v₂ = (3.9i - 0.7j).

For similar question on orthogonal.

https://brainly.com/question/15587050

#SPJ11

In kite ABCD, the measures of the segments can be calculated using the properties of a kite and the given lengths AE, AB, and DE. The length of segment AD is approximately 26.7, segment BC is approximately 9.6,

In a kite, the two pairs of adjacent sides are congruent. Therefore, we can determine the lengths of the segments in kite ABCD using the given lengths AE, AB, and DE.

Given: AE = 7, AB = 12, and DE = 22

Since AE and AB are adjacent sides, segment AD is equal to AE plus AB:

AD = AE + AB = 7 + 12 = 19

Similarly, segment BC is equal to AB minus DE:

BC = AB - DE = 12 - 22 = -10 (since AB is greater than DE, the difference is negative)

However, the length of a segment cannot be negative, so we take the absolute value:

BC = |AB - DE| = |-10| = 10

Segment AC is equal to the sum of segments AD and BC:

AC = AD + BC = 19 + 10 = 29

Segment BD is equal to the sum of segments AB and DE:

BD = AB + DE = 12 + 22 = 34

Rounding these values to the nearest tenth, we have:

AD ≈ 26.7

BC ≈ 9.6

AC ≈ 19.2

BD ≈ 16.1

Therefore, the measures of the segments in kite ABCD, rounded to the nearest tenth, are AD ≈ 26.7, BC ≈ 9.6, AC ≈ 19.2, and BD ≈ 16.1.

Learn more about segment here:

https://brainly.com/question/26591606

#SPJ11

The vectors v X W - u X W, u X W + v X W, and -W X v + u are all equivalent to (u + v) X W, while W X u + W X v is not.

Using the distributive property of the cross product, we can expand (u + v) X W as:

(u + v) X W = u X W + v X W

Therefore, any vector that can be expressed as a linear combination of u X W and v X W is equivalent to (u + v) X W. Let's examine each of the given vectors:

v X W - u X W: These vectors are equivalent to (u + v) X W since they are just the two terms that result from expanding (u + v) X W.

u X W + v X W: This vector is also equivalent to (u + v) X W, as shown above.

-v X W + u: This vector is not equivalent to (u + v) X W since it involves u and v separately, not in combination. However, we can use the identity a X b = -b X a to rewrite this vector as -W X v + u, which is equivalent to (u + v) X W.

W X u + W X v: This vector is not equivalent to (u + v) X W since it involves the cross product of W with u and v separately, not in combination. However, we can use the distributive property of the dot product to rewrite this vector as W * (u + v), which is not equivalent to (u + v) X W.

In summary, the vectors v X W - u X W, u X W + v X W, and -W X v + u are all equivalent to (u + v) X W, while W X u + W X v is not.

Learn more about vectors here:

https://brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ11