The answer cannot be provided in one row without knowing the radius of the disk or additional information about its geometry
Determine the angular velocity of a 3kg disk after 3 seconds, given that a cord is wrapped around its outer surface and it is released from rest?To determine the angular velocity of the disk after 3 seconds, we need to consider the conservation of angular momentum. Since the cord is wrapped around the outer surface of the disk, it provides a torque that causes the disk to rotate.
The equation for angular momentum is:
L =[tex]I * ω[/tex]
Where L is the angular momentum, I is the moment of inertia, and ω is the angular velocity.
In this case, the cord exerts a torque on the disk, causing it to rotate. The torque can be calculated as the tension in the cord multiplied by the radius of the disk:
τ =[tex]T * r[/tex]
Since the disk is released from rest, the initial angular velocity (ω_initial) is 0. We can then relate the initial and final angular momenta as follows:
L_initial =[tex]I * ω_[/tex]initial = 0
L_final =[tex]I * ω[/tex]_final
Since the torque acting on the disk is constant, we can use the formula for torque and angular acceleration to relate the torque and angular momentum:
τ =[tex]I * α[/tex]
Since the disk is released from rest, the angular acceleration (α) is constant. Therefore, we can write:
[tex]τ = I * α = I * (ω_final - ω_initial) / t[/tex]
Simplifying the equation:
[tex]τ = I * α = I * ω_final / t[/tex]
Rearranging the equation to solve for ω_final:
ω_final = (τ * t) / I
Now we can substitute the known values into the equation to calculate the angular velocity (ω_final) after 3 seconds.
Given:
Mass of the disk (m) = 3 kg
Radius of the disk (r) = ? (not provided)
Time (t) = 3 seconds
To calculate the moment of inertia (I), we need to know the radius of the disk. Since it's not provided, we cannot determine the exact angular velocity. However, we can discuss the possible options based on the given choices:
omega = 138.9 rad/s
omega = 163.3 rad/s
omega = 245.0 rad/s
omega = 490.0 rad/s
Without knowing the radius, we cannot determine the correct angular velocity. The moment of inertia depends on the distribution of mass around the axis of rotation, which is directly related to the radius of the disk.
To find the correct angular velocity, we would need the radius of the disk or additional information about the disk's geometry.
Learn more about radius
brainly.com/question/24051825
#SPJ11
the maximum photoelectron ejection speed in meters per second for an electron ejected from potassium if the light has a wavelength of 210 nm .
For an electron ejected from potassium by light with a wavelength of 210 nm, the maximal photoelectron ejection speed is approximately 5.31 x 10⁵ m/s.
The maximum photoelectron ejection speed can be calculated using the equation:
E = hf - φ
where E is the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectron, h is Planck's constant, f is the frequency of the incident light, and φ is the work function of the metal.
The frequency of the incident light can be calculated from its wavelength using the equation:
c = λf
where c is the speed of light in vacuum, λ is the wavelength of the light, and f is the frequency of the light.
Substituting the given values, we get:
f = c / λ = (3.00 x 10⁸ m/s) / (210 x 10⁻⁹ m) = 1.43 x 10¹⁵ Hz
The work function of potassium is approximately 2.3 eV or 3.68 x 10⁻¹⁹ J.
Substituting the values into the equation for the maximum kinetic energy, we get:
E = hf - φ = (6.63 x 10⁻³⁴ J s) x (1.43 x 10¹⁵ Hz) - 3.68 x 10⁻¹⁹ J
E = 9.25 x 10⁻¹⁹ J
The maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectron is equal to the kinetic energy of a particle with a mass of 9.11 x 10⁻³¹ kg traveling at a velocity v. We can use the equation for kinetic energy to find the velocity v:
E = (1/2)mv²
Solving for v, we get:
v = √(2E / m) = √(2 x 9.25 x 10⁻¹⁹ J / 9.11 x 10⁻³¹ kg) = 5.31 x 10⁵ m/s
Therefore, the maximum photoelectron ejection speed for an electron ejected from potassium by light with a wavelength of 210 nm is approximately 5.31 x 10⁵ m/s.
Learn more about photoelectron on:
https://brainly.com/question/14558106
#SPJ11
The allowed energies of a quantum system are 0.0 eV, 5.5 eV , and 8.5 eV .What wavelengths appear in the system's emission spectrum?
If The allowed energies of a quantum system are 0.0 eV, 5.5 eV , and 8.5 eV then the emission spectrum of this quantum system consists of photons with wavelengths of 358 nm and 233 nm.
The wavelengths in the system's emission spectrum can be found using the formula:
λ = hc/E
where λ is the wavelength, h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and E is the energy of the photon emitted.
Using the given energies of the quantum system, we can calculate the wavelengths corresponding to the emitted photons:
For an energy of 0.0 eV, the wavelength is:
λ = hc/E = (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J s) x (2.998 x 10⁸ m/s) / (0 eV) = undefined (since division by 0 is undefined)
For an energy of 5.5 eV, the wavelength is:
λ = hc/E = (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J s) x (2.998 x 10⁸ m/s) / (5.5 eV x 1.602 x 10⁻¹⁹ J/eV) = 3.58 x 10⁻⁷ m = 358 nm
For an energy of 8.5 eV, the wavelength is:
λ = hc/E = (6.626 x 10⁻³⁴ J s) x (2.998 x 10⁸m/s) / (8.5 eV x 1.602 x 10⁻¹⁹ J/eV) = 2.33 x 10⁻⁷m = 233 nm
Therefore, the emission spectrum of this quantum system consists of photons with wavelengths of 358 nm and 233 nm.
To learn more about wavelength https://brainly.com/question/10750459
#SPJ11
A suspension bridge oscillates with an effective force constant of 1.66 ✕ 108 N/m. (a) How much energy (in J) is needed to make it oscillate with an amplitude of 0.124 m? J (b) If soldiers march across the bridge with a cadence equal to the bridge's natural frequency and impart 1.68 ✕ 104 J of energy each second, how long does it take (in s) for the bridge's oscillations to go from 0.124 m to 0.547 m amplitude?
The energy needed to make the suspension bridge oscillate with an amplitude of 0.124 m is 1.04 × 10^5 J. It takes approximately 11.5 seconds for the bridge's oscillations to go from 0.124 m to 0.547 m amplitude.
The energy of oscillation in a system is given by the formula: E = (1/2)kA^2, where E is the energy, k is the effective force constant, and A is the amplitude of oscillation. Plugging in the given values, we get E = (1/2)(1.66 × 10^8 N/m)(0.124 m)^2 = 1.04 × 10^5 J. The natural frequency of oscillation for the bridge can be calculated using the formula: f = (1/2π)√(k/m), where f is the frequency, k is the effective force constant, and m is the mass. Since the mass is not given, we can assume it cancels out when comparing ratios. Thus, the ratio of frequencies is equal to the ratio of amplitudes, and we can use the formula: T2/T1 = A2/A1, where T is the time period and A is the amplitude. Rearranging the formula, we get T2 = (A2/A1) × T1. Plugging in the given values, we have T2 = (0.547 m/0.124 m) × T1 ≈ 11.5 s.
learn more about amplitude here:
https://brainly.com/question/9525052
#SPJ11
true/false. in reality, when a circuit is first connected to a power source the current through the circuit does not jump discontinuously from zero to its maximum value
The statement "In reality, when a circuit is first connected to a power source the current through the circuit does not jump discontinuously from zero to its maximum value" is True.
This is because the behavior of an electrical circuit is governed by the principles of electromagnetism, which include the laws of induction and capacitance. When a circuit is first connected to a power source, the voltage across the circuit changes instantaneously from zero to its maximum value, which can cause a transient response in the circuit. This transient response can cause the current in the circuit to increase rapidly, but it does not jump discontinuously from zero to its maximum value.
The rate of change of current in the circuit is determined by the inductance and capacitance of the circuit. An inductor resists changes in the current flow through a circuit, while a capacitor resists changes in the voltage across a circuit. These properties cause the current in the circuit to increase gradually until it reaches its steady-state value.
In addition, the resistance of the circuit also affects the rate of change of current. A circuit with high resistance will have a slower rate of change of current compared to a circuit with low resistance.
Therefore, the current in a circuit does not jump discontinuously from zero to its maximum value when the circuit is first connected to a power source due to the principles of electromagnetism and the properties of the circuit components.
To learn more about circuit refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/27206933
#SPJ11
what happens to wind waves as they approach a shoreline? group of answer choices the wave velocity decreases, the wave height increases, and the wavelength increases. the wave velocity decreases, the wave height increases, and the wavelength decreases. the wave velocity increases, the wave height increases, and the wavelength increases. the wave velocity increases, the wave height increases, and the wavelength decreases. the wave velocity decreases, the wave height decreases, and the wavelength decreases.
The wave velocity decreases, the wave height increases, and the wavelength increases. Option 1 is Correct.
As wind waves approach a shoreline, the wave height generally increases, the wavelength decreases, and the wave velocity increases. This is because the energy of the waves is dissipated as they approach the shore, and the breaking of the waves causes the water to be thrown up onto the shore, which increases the height of the waves.
The decreasing wavelength and increasing wave velocity are both consequences of the energy dissipation that occurs as the waves approach the shore. Therefore, the correct answer is: the wave velocity decreases, the wave height increases, and the wavelength increases. Option 1 is Correct.
Learn more about wavelength Visit: brainly.com/question/24452579
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
what happens to wind waves as they approach a shoreline? group of answer choices
1. the wave velocity decreases, the wave height increases, and the wavelength increases.
2. the wave velocity decreases, the wave height increases, and the wavelength decreases.
3. the wave velocity increases, the wave height increases, and the wavelength increases.
4. the wave velocity increases, the wave height increases, and the wavelength decreases.
5. the wave velocity decreases, the wave height decreases, and the wavelength decreases.
When displaced from equilibrium by a small amount, the two hydrogen atoms in an H
2
molecule are acted on by a restoring force F
x
=
−
k
1
x
with k
1
=
530
N/m.
Calculate the oscillation frequency f
of the H
2
molecule.
Use m
e
f
f
=
m
2
as the "effective mass" of the system, where m
is the mass of a hydrogen atom. Take the mass of a hydrogen atom as 1.008 μ
,
where 1
μ
=
1.661
×
10
−
27
kg . Express your answer in hertz.
The oscillation frequency of the H2 molecule is approximately 1.27 × 10¹³ Hz.
To calculate the oscillation frequency (f) of the H2 molecule, we can use the formula for the frequency of a harmonic oscillator:
f = (1 / 2π) * √(k₁ / m_eff)
Given, k₁ = 530 N/m, and m_eff = m/2, where m is the mass of a hydrogen atom.
First, let's find the mass of a hydrogen atom:
1.008 μ = 1.008 * 1.661 × 10⁻²⁷ kg
m ≈ 1.675 × 10⁻²⁷ kg
Now, we can calculate the effective mass (m_eff):
m_eff = m / 2
m_eff ≈ (1.675 × 10⁻²⁷ kg) / 2
m_eff ≈ 0.8375 × 10⁻²⁷ kg
Finally, let's find the oscillation frequency (f):
f = (1 / 2π) * √(530 N/m / 0.8375 × 10⁻²⁷ kg)
f ≈ (1 / 2π) * √(6.33 × 10²⁶ s²)
f ≈ (1 / 6.28) * √(6.33 × 10²⁶ s²)
f ≈ 0.159 * √(6.33 × 10²⁶ s²)
f ≈ 1.27 × 10¹³ Hz
So, the oscillation frequency of the H2 molecule is approximately 1.27 × 10¹³ Hz.
Know more about oscillation frequency
https://brainly.com/question/30694091
#SPJ11
The oscillation frequency f of an H₂ molecule, when displaced from equilibrium by a small amount and acted on by a restoring force Fₓ= -k₁x with k₁=530 N/m, is calculated using the formula meff f²=k₁/m, where meff is the effective mass of the system. For H₂, meff = m/2, where m is the mass of a hydrogen atom (1.008 μ or 1.008 x 10⁻²⁷ kg). Substituting these values, we get f = 1.16 x 10¹⁵ Hz.
In a simple harmonic motion, the restoring force is directly proportional to the displacement from equilibrium. For an H₂ molecule, the restoring force is Fₓ= -k₁x, where k₁=530 N/m. The oscillation frequency f is related to the restoring force and the effective mass of the system, given by meff f²=k₁/m. For H₂, the effective mass is meff = m/2, where m is the mass of a hydrogen atom (1.008 μ or 1.008 x 10⁻²⁷ kg). Substituting these values, we get f = 1.16 x 10¹⁵ Hz. This means that the two hydrogen atoms in an H₂ molecule oscillate back and forth 1.16 x 10¹⁵ times per second when displaced from their equilibrium position by a small amount.
The oscillation frequency f can be calculated using the formula: f = (1/2π) √(k₁/m_eff)
where k₁ is the spring constant of the H₂ molecule, m_eff is the effective mass of the system, and π is a mathematical constant approximately equal to 3.14.We are given the value of k₁ as 530 N/m and the mass of a hydrogen atom as 1.008 μ, so we can calculate the effective mass as: m_eff = 2m = 2(1.008 μ) = 2.016 μ
Substituting these values into the formula, we get: f = (1/2π) √(530 N/m / 2.016 μ)
= 1.23 × 10¹⁴ Hz
Therefore, the oscillation frequency of the H₂ molecule is approximately 1.23 × 10¹⁴ Hz.
learn more about effective mass here:
https://brainly.in/question/16599656
#SPJ11
In an electric circuit comprising of a copper wire of length L and area of cross section A, the ammeter reads 5 A. How will the reading in the ammeter change when
a) length of the copper wire is reduced? b) more thicker copper wire is used?
c) a nichrome wire of length L and area of cross section A is used in place of copper wire?
a) When the length of the copper wire is reduced, the reading in the ammeter will remain unchanged as long as the resistance of the wire remains constant.
This is because the current flowing through a wire is inversely proportional to its length, according to Ohm's Law (V = IR), where V is the voltage, I is the current, and R is the resistance. As long as the voltage and resistance remain constant, the current will also remain constant.
b) If a thicker copper wire is used, the reading in the ammeter will decrease. This is because the resistance of a wire is inversely proportional to its cross-sectional area. When a thicker wire is used, its cross-sectional area increases, leading to a decrease in resistance. According to Ohm's Law, with a constant voltage, a decrease in resistance will result in an increase in current. Therefore, the ammeter reading will be higher when a thicker wire is used.
c) If a nichrome wire of the same length and cross-sectional area is used in place of the copper wire, the reading in the ammeter will depend on the resistance of the nichrome wire. Nichrome has a higher resistivity compared to copper, meaning it has a higher resistance for the same length and cross-sectional area. Therefore, when the nichrome wire is used, the resistance of the circuit increases, resulting in a decrease in current according to Ohm's Law. As a result, the ammeter reading will be lower when the nichrome wire is used
learn more about electric circuit here:
https://brainly.com/question/13443886
#SPJ11
A point charge q1=5.00μCq1=5.00μC is held fixed in space. From a horizontal distance of 7.00 cm, a small sphere with mass 4.00×10−3kg4.00×10−3kg and charge q2=+2.00μCq2=+2.00μC is fired toward the fixed charge with an initial speed of 36.0 m/sm/s. Gravity can be neglected.
What is the acceleration of the sphere at the instant when its speed is 24.0 m/sm/s?
The acceleration of the sphere when its speed is 24.0 m/s is 9.26 × 10^5 g.
At any instant, the force on q2 is given by the electrostatic force and can be calculated using Coulomb's law:
[tex]F = k(q1q2)/r^2[/tex]
where k is Coulomb's constant, q1 is the fixed charge, q2 is the charge on the sphere, and r is the distance between them.
The electric force is conservative, so it does not dissipate energy. Thus, the work done by the electric force on the sphere is equal to the change in kinetic energy:
W = ΔK
where W is the work done, and ΔK is the change in kinetic energy.
The work done by the electric force on the sphere can be expressed as the line integral of the electrostatic force over the path of the sphere:
W = ∫F⋅ds
where ds is the displacement vector along the path.
Since the force is radial, it is only in the direction of the displacement vector, so the work done simplifies to:
W = ∫Fdr = kq1q2∫dr/r^2
The integral evaluates to:
W = [tex]kq1q2(1/r_f - 1/r_i)[/tex]
where r_f is the final distance between the charges and r_i is the initial distance.
The work-energy theorem states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its kinetic energy. Thus, we have:
W = ΔK =[tex](1/2)mv_f^2 - (1/2)mv_i^2[/tex]
where m is the mass of the sphere, v_i is the initial speed, and v_f is the final speed.
Setting these two equations equal to each other and solving for v_f, we get:
[tex]v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2kq1q2/m(r_i - r_f)[/tex]
Taking the derivative of this expression with respect to time, we get:
a =[tex](v_fdv_f/dr)(dr/dt) = (2kq1q2/m)(dv_f/dr)[/tex]
Substituting the given values, we get:
[tex]a = (2 \times 9 \times10^9 N \timesm^2/C^2 \times 5 \times10^-6 C \times 2 \times 10^-6 C / 4 \times 10^-3 kg) \times ((36 - 24) m/s) / (0.07 m)[/tex]
a = 9.257 × 10^6 m/s^2 or 9.26 × 10^5 g
For more such questions on acceleration
https://brainly.com/question/26408808
#SPJ11
What is the average distance the car traveled from the top of the track? cm What is the average distance the washer traveled from the top of the track? cm.
The average distance the car traveled from the top of the track and the average distance the washer traveled from the top of the track are not provided in the given information. Without specific values or data regarding the distances, it is not possible to determine the average distances traveled by the car and the washer.
In order to calculate the average distances traveled by the car and the washer from the top of the track, we need specific measurements or data points. The average distance is typically calculated by summing up all the individual distances and then dividing by the total number of distances.
Without any information on the measurements or data points, such as the starting and ending positions or the specific distances covered, it is not possible to determine the average distances traveled by the car and the washer. It is important to have precise measurements or data points in order to make accurate calculations and determine the average distances.
Learn more about average distance here:
https://brainly.com/question/13905361
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer.
You are standing 1 meter away from a convex mirror in a carnival fun house. How would you look in the mirror?
A) standing upright but smaller than your actual height
B) standing upside down and smaller than your actual height
C) standing upright but taller than your actual height
D) standing upside down and the same height that you are
You are standing 1 meter away from a convex mirror in a carnival fun house. then standing upright but smaller than your actual height. Hence option A is correct.
In a convex mirror, the image is virtual and the reflection appears smaller than the real object. Convex mirrors provide a more compact, upright picture of the item by having an outwardly curving reflecting surface that causes light rays to diverge or spread out.
Convex mirrors are curved mirrors with reflecting surfaces that protrude in the direction of the light source. This protruding surface does not serve as a light focus; rather, it reflects light outward. As the focal point (F) and the centre of curvature (2F) are fictitious points in the mirror that cannot be reached, these mirrors create a virtual image. As a result, pictures are created that can only be seen in the mirror and cannot be projected onto a screen. When viewed from a distance, the image is smaller than the thing, but as it approaches the mirror, it becomes larger.
TO know more about Convex mirror :
https://brainly.com/question/31234954
#SPJ1.
One face of an aluminium cube of edge 2 metre is maintained at 100∘C and the other end is m baintained at 0∘ C. All other surfaces are covered by nonconducting walls. Find the amount of heat flowing through the cube in 5 seconds. (thermal conductivity of aluminium is 209 W/m∘C)
The heat flowing through the aluminium cube with one face at 100°C and the other at 0°C in 5 seconds is 62.7 kW, calculated using Q = (kAΔT)/d formula.
To calculate the amount of heat flowing through the aluminium cube, we need to use the formula:
Q = kA (T1 - T2) / d, where Q is the amount of heat transferred,
k is the thermal conductivity of aluminium, A is the surface area of the cube,
T1 is the temperature of the hot face, T2 is the temperature of the cold face, and d is the thickness of the cube.
Here, the hot face is maintained at 100°C, the cold face is maintained at 0°C, and all other surfaces are covered by non-conducting walls.
Therefore, using the given values, we get: Q = 209 x 6 x (100 - 0) / 2 = 62,700 J.
Therefore, the amount of heat flowing through the aluminium cube in 5 seconds is 62,700 J.
For more such questions on aluminium, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/24215446
#SPJ11
The amount of heat flowing through the aluminum cube in 5 seconds is 10,032 W.
The amount of heat flowing through the aluminum cube can be calculated using the formula Q = kA(ΔT/t), where Q is the heat flow, k is the thermal conductivity of aluminum, A is the surface area of the cube, ΔT is the temperature difference between the hot and cold ends, and t is the time. In this problem, we are given the dimensions of an aluminum cube and the temperature difference between its hot and cold ends. We can calculate the amount of heat flowing through the cube using the formula Q = kA(ΔT/t), where Q is the heat flow, k is the thermal conductivity of aluminum, A is the surface area of the cube, ΔT is the temperature difference between the hot and cold ends, and t is the time.
First, we can calculate the surface area of the cube, which is 6*(2m)^2 = 24m^2. Then, we can plug in the given values of k = 209 W/m∘C, ΔT = 100∘C, t = 5s, and solve for Q.
Q = (209 W/m∘C) * (24 m^2) * (100∘C / 5s) = 10,032 W
Learn more about thermal conductivity here:
https://brainly.com/question/14553214
#SPJ11
consider a 567 nm wavelength yellow light falling on a pair of slits separated by 0.11 mm.
The angle for the third-order maximum of 567-nm wavelength yellow light falling on double slits separated by 0.11 mm is 0.86 degrees.
The angle for the third-order maximum can be calculated using the formula:
sinθ = mλ/d
where θ is the angle of diffraction, λ is the wavelength of the light, d is the distance between the slits, and m is the order of the maximum.
In this case, the wavelength of the yellow light is λ = 567 nm = 5.67 × 10^-7 m, the distance between the slits is d = 0.11 mm = 1.1 × 10^-4 m, and we want to find the angle for the third-order maximum, so m = 3.
Plugging these values into the formula, we get:
sinθ = 3 × 5.67 × 10^-7 m / (1.1 × 10^-4 m)
sinθ = 0.015
Taking the inverse sine (sin^-1) of both sides of the equation, we get:
θ = sin^-1(0.015)
θ = 0.86 degrees
For more question on wavelength click on
https://brainly.com/question/10728818
#SPJ11
CORRECT FORM OF QUESTION
Calculate the angle for the third-order maximum of 567-nm wavelength yellow light falling on double slits separated by 0.11 mm.
In this case, the wavelength of the yellow light is 567 nm, which is in the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum. The separation distance between the slits is 0.11 mm.
Given a 567 nm wavelength yellow light falling on a pair of slits separated by 0.11 mm, we can analyze the interference pattern created by this setup.
1. Convert the wavelength and slit separation to the same units (meters in this case):
Wavelength (λ) = 567 nm = 567 * 10^(-9) m
Slit separation (d) = 0.11 mm = 0.11 * 10^(-3) m
2. Calculate the angular separation (θ) between adjacent bright fringes using the formula for the interference pattern in a double-slit experiment:
θ = λ / d
3. Substitute the given values:
θ = (567 * 10^(-9)) / (0.11 * 10^(-3))
4. Simplify:
θ ≈ 5.16 * 10^(-6) radians
So, when a 567 nm wavelength yellow light falls on a pair of slits separated by 0.11 mm, the angular separation between adjacent bright fringes in the interference pattern is approximately 5.16 * 10^(-6) radians.
Learn more about wavelength here : brainly.com/question/12924624
#SPJ11
A 2.80 μf capacitor is charged to 500 v and a 3.80 μfcapacitor is charged to 520 V. What will be the charge on each capacitor?
The formula to calculate the charge on a capacitor is Q = CV, where Q is the charge, C is the capacitance, and V is the voltage. Using this formula, the charge on the 2.80 μf capacitor can be calculated as: Q = (2.80 μf) x (500 V)
Q = 1400 μC
Therefore, the charge on the 2.80 μf capacitor is 1400 μC.
Similarly, the charge on the 3.80 μf capacitor can be calculated as:
Q = (3.80 μf) x (520 V)
Q = 1976 μC
Therefore, the charge on the 3.80 μf capacitor is 1976 μC.
To find the charge on each capacitor, you can use the formula Q = CV, where Q is the charge, C is the capacitance, and V is the voltage.
For the 2.80 μF capacitor charged to 500 V:
1. Multiply the capacitance (2.80 μF) by the voltage (500 V): Q1 = (2.80 μF) × (500 V)
2. Calculate the charge: Q1 = 1400 μC
For the 3.80 μF capacitor charged to 520 V:
1. Multiply the capacitance (3.80 μF) by the voltage (520 V): Q2 = (3.80 μF) × (520 V)
2. Calculate the charge: Q2 = 1976 μC
So, the charge on the 2.80 μF capacitor is 1400 μC, and the charge on the 3.80 μF capacitor is 1976 μC.
To know more about Capacitor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17176550
#SPJ11
Radio station WKCC broadcasts at 600 on the AM dial. What is the wavelength of this radiation? (c = 3 x 108 m/s). O A. 200 m OB. 0.5 km c. 5 km OD. 20 km O E. 50 m.
The wavelength of the radiation broadcasted by radio station WKCC is approximately 500 meters.
To find the wavelength of the radiation broadcasted by radio station WKCC, we can use the formula:
wavelength = speed of light/frequency
Here, the frequency is given as 600 on the AM dial. However, we need to convert this to Hertz (Hz) since frequency is measured in Hz.
To do this, we can use the formula:
frequency in Hz = (frequency on dial x 1000 kHz) + 500 kHz
Plugging in the values, we get:
frequency in Hz = (600 x 1000) + 500000 = 600500 Hz
Now we can calculate the wavelength:
wavelength = speed of light / frequency in Hz
wavelength = 3 x 10^8 / 600500 = 499.58 meters
To know more about wavelength of the radiation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9108146
#SPJ11
m – m = 5logd – 5 (you will be given this formula and expected to use it to calculate distance given apparent magnitude and absolute magnitude.)
Absolute magnitude (M) is a measure of the intrinsic brightness of an object, assuming it is at a distance of 10 parsecs from Earth.
To use the given formula to calculate distance, we need to understand the terms involved. Apparent magnitude (m) is a measure of the brightness of a celestial object as observed from Earth.
The term 5logd – 5 represents the distance modulus, which is a measure of the difference between the apparent and absolute magnitudes of an object. It is used to calculate the distance of the object from Earth.
To use the formula, we first need to rearrange it to solve for distance (d):
d = 10^((m-M+5)/5)
We can now plug in the given values of m and M to calculate the distance. For example, if m = 4 and M = 2, then:
d = 10^((4-2+5)/5) = 31.62 parsecs
To conclude that the formula is a useful tool in astronomy for determining the distance of celestial objects. By comparing the apparent and absolute magnitudes of an object, we can calculate its distance from Earth. This is important for studying the properties of objects in the universe, such as their size, mass, and age. The distance modulus can also be used to determine the distances between objects in space, such as galaxies and clusters. Overall, the formula provides a way for astronomers to measure the vast distances involved in studying the cosmos, and to gain a deeper understanding of our place in the universe.
To know more about Absolute magnitude visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31022175
#SPJ11
two events occur in an inertial system at the same time, but 8880 km apart. however in another inertial system these two events are observed to be 15845 km apart.What is the time difference between the two events in this second inertial system?
The time difference between the two events in the second inertial system can be found using the equation:
Δx' = γ(Δx - vΔt)
Where Δx' is the observed distance between the two events in the second inertial system (15845 km), Δx is the actual distance between the two events in the first inertial system (8880 km), v is the relative velocity between the two inertial systems, and γ is the Lorentz factor given by:
γ = 1/√(1 - v^2/c^2)
where c is the speed of light.
Solving for Δt, we get:
Δt = (Δx - Δx'/γ) / v
Assuming the relative velocity between the two inertial systems is 0.6c (where c is the speed of light), we get:
γ = 1/√(1 - 0.6^2) = 1.25
Δt = (8880 km - 15845 km/1.25) / (0.6c)
Δt = (8880 km - 12676 km) / (0.6c)
Δt = (-3796 km) / (0.6c)
Using the conversion factor 1 km = 3.33564e-9 s, we can convert this to seconds:
Δt = (-3796 km) / (0.6c) * (1 km / 3.33564e-9 s)
Δt = -0.715 s
Therefore, the time difference between the two events in the second inertial system is -0.715 seconds. This negative sign indicates that the second event is observed to occur before the first event in this inertial system.
learn more about inertial
#SPJ11
Rutherford's scattering experiments gave the first indications that an atom consists of a small, dense, positively charged nucleus surrounded by negatively charged electrons. His experiments also allowed for a rough determination of the size of the nucleus. In this problem, you will use the uncertainty principle to get a rough idea of the kinetic energy of a particle inside the nucleus.
Consider a nucleus with a diameter of roughly 5.0×10−15 meters.
Part A
Consider a particle inside the nucleus. The uncertainty Δx in its position is equal to the diameter of the nucleus. What is the uncertainty Δp of its momentum? To find this, use ΔxΔp≥ℏ.
Express your answer in kilogram-meters per second to two significant figures.
Part B
The uncertainty Δp sets a lower bound on the average momentum of a particle in the nucleus. If a particle's average momentum were to fall below that point, then the uncertainty principle would be violated. Since the uncertainty principle is a fundamental law of physics, this cannot happen. Using Δp=2.1×10−20 kilogram-meters per second as the minimum momentum of a particle in the nucleus, find the minimum kinetic energy Kmin of the particle. Use m=1.7×10−27 kilograms as the mass of the particle. Note that since our calculations are so rough, this serves as the mass of a neutron or a proton.
Express your answer in millions of electron volts to two significant figures.
Rutherford's scattering experiments gave the first indications that an atom consists of a small, dense, positively charged nucleus surrounded by negatively charged electrons. Consider a nucleus with a diameter of roughly 5.0×[tex]10^{-15}[/tex] meters. The uncertainty in momentum is 2.1×[tex]10^{-20}[/tex] kg m/s. The minimum kinetic energy is 1.1×[tex]10^{6}[/tex] eV, or 1.1 million electron volts.
Part A
The uncertainty principle states that ΔxΔp≥ℏ, where Δx is the uncertainty in position, Δp is the uncertainty in momentum, and ℏ is the reduced Planck constant.
For a particle inside the nucleus, Δx is equal to the diameter of the nucleus, which is 5.0×[tex]10^{-15}[/tex] meters. Therefore
ΔxΔp≥ℏ
(5.0×[tex]10^{-15}[/tex] )(Δp)≥(1.054×[tex]10^{-34}[/tex])
Δp≥(1.054×[tex]10^{-34}[/tex])/(5.0×[tex]10^{-15}[/tex] )
Δp≥2.11×[tex]10^{-20}[/tex] kgm/s
Rounded to two significant figures, the uncertainty in momentum is 2.1×[tex]10^{-20}[/tex] kgm/s.
Part B
The minimum kinetic energy Kmin of a particle in the nucleus can be found using the formula
Kmin = [tex]p^{2}[/tex] / 2m
Where p is the minimum momentum of the particle, and m is the mass of the particle.
Substituting the given values
Kmin = (2.1×[tex]10^{-20}[/tex] )^2 / (2×1.7×[tex]10^{-27}[/tex])
Kmin = 1.7×[tex]10^{-10}[/tex] J
To convert this to electron volts, we can use the conversion factor 1 eV = 1.602×[tex]10^{-19}[/tex] J
Kmin = ( 1.7×[tex]10^{-10}[/tex] J) / (1.602×[tex]10^{-19}[/tex] J)
Kmin = 1.06×[tex]10^{9}[/tex]eV
Rounded to two significant figures, the minimum kinetic energy is 1.1×[tex]10^{6}[/tex] eV, or 1.1 million electron volts.
To know more about uncertainty in momentum here
https://brainly.com/question/13032962
#SPJ4
The uncertainty principle states that ΔxΔp≥ℏ, where ℏ is Planck's constant divided by 2π (ℏ = h/2π). We are given Δx = 5.0×[tex]10^{-15}[/tex] meters. Therefore, ΔxΔp≥ℏ gives us: Δp ≥ ℏ/Δx, Δp ≥ (h/2π)/Δx
Δp ≥ (6.63×[tex]10^{-34}[/tex] J s)/(2π × 5.0×[tex]10^{-15}[/tex] m), Δp ≥ 2.1×[tex]10^{-20}[/tex] kg m/s. Therefore, the uncertainty in momentum is Δp = 2.1×[tex]10^{-20}[/tex] kg m/s. The minimum kinetic energy [tex]K_{min}[/tex]of a particle is given by [tex]K_{min}[/tex]= [tex]p^{2}[/tex]/(2m), where p is the momentum of the particle and m is its mass. We are given Δp = 2.1×[tex]10^{-20}[/tex] kg m/s and m = 1.7×[tex]10^{-27}[/tex] kg. Therefore, [tex]K_{min}[/tex] = [tex]p^{2}[/tex]/(2m), [tex]K_{min}[/tex] = (2.1×[tex]10^{-20}[/tex] kg m/s)^2/(2 × 1.7×[tex]10^{-27}[/tex] kg), [tex]K_{min}[/tex] = 1.5×[tex]10^{-10}[/tex] J. To convert to electron volts, we divide by the charge of an electron (1.602×[tex]10^{-19}[/tex] C) and multiply by [tex]10^{-6}[/tex] to get:[tex]K_{min}[/tex] = (1.5×[tex]10^{-10}[/tex] J)/(1.602×[tex]10^{-19}[/tex] C) × [tex]10^{-6}[/tex], [tex]K_{min}[/tex] = 0.93 MeV (million electron volts). Therefore, the minimum kinetic energy of a particle inside the nucleus is approximately 0.93 MeV.
Learn more about uncertainty principle here :
https://brainly.com/question/30325893
#SPJ11
because of ben franklin’s work, the direction of current in an electrical circuit is defined as going from:
Benjamin Franklin was a key figure in the early study of electricity, and his work helped to define many of the fundamental principles that we use today. One of his most important contributions was his discovery of the concept of electrical charge, and how it moves through a circuit.
Franklin's experiments led him to conclude that there were two types of electrical charge: positive and negative. He also observed that when a charged object was connected to a conductor (such as a wire), the charge would flow from the object to the conductor. This flow of charge became known as electric current.
Based on his observations, Franklin established a convention for the direction of current flow in a circuit. He defined the direction of current as going from the positive terminal of a battery or power source, through the circuit, and back to the negative terminal. This convention is still used today, and it helps to provide a standardized way of describing and analyzing electrical circuits.
So to sum up, because of Benjamin Franklin's work, the direction of current in an electrical circuit is defined as going from the positive terminal of a power source to the negative terminal, and this convention is still widely used in electrical engineering and other related fields.
to know more about Benjamin Franklin click this link
brainly.com/question/12029815
#SPJ11
specify the required torque rating for a clutch to be attached to a motor shaft running at 1750 rpm. the motor is rated at 54th power and is of the design be tight
For a 54 HP motor at 1750 RPM, torque is 159.3 lb-ft. To calculate torque, use the formula: Torque (lb-ft) = (Horsepower x 5252) / RPM.
The required torque rating for a clutch attached to a motor shaft running at 1750 RPM with a motor rated at 54 HP can be calculated using the following formula:
Torque (lb-ft) = (Horsepower x 5252) / RPM.
Plugging in the values, Torque = (54 x 5252) / 1750, which results in a torque of approximately 159.3 lb-ft.
When selecting a clutch, it is essential to choose one with a torque rating equal to or higher than the calculated value to ensure optimal performance and avoid potential damage to the motor or clutch due to excessive torque.
For more such questions on motor, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/18619348
#SPJ11
The required torque rating for a clutch to be attached to a motor shaft running at 1750 rpm, with a motor rated at 54 kW power and of the design B type, is 311.95 Nm (Newton-meters).
Determine how to find the required torque rating?To calculate the required torque rating, we can use the formula:
Torque (Nm) = (Power (kW) * 1000) / (2π * Speed (rpm))
Given that the power of the motor is 54 kW and the speed is 1750 rpm, we can substitute these values into the formula:
Torque (Nm) = (54 * 1000) / (2π * 1750)
Simplifying the equation:
Torque (Nm) = 54000 / (2 * 3.14 * 1750)
= 54000 / 10990
Calculating the result:
Torque (Nm) ≈ 4.91 Nm
Therefore, the required torque rating for the clutch is approximately 311.95 Nm.
To know more about torque, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30338175#
#SPJ4
Calculate the gauge pressure at a depth of 690 m in seawater
The gauge pressure at a depth of 690 m in seawater is approximately 68.01 MPa. At any depth in a fluid, the pressure exerted by the fluid is determined by the weight of the fluid column above that point.
In the case of seawater, the pressure increases with depth due to the increasing weight of the water above. To calculate the gauge pressure at a specific depth, we can use the formula:
[tex]\[ P = \rho \cdot g \cdot h \][/tex]
where P is the pressure, [tex]\( \rho \)[/tex] is the density of the fluid, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the depth.
For seawater, the average density is approximately 1025 kg/m³. The acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s². Plugging in these values and the depth of 690 m into the formula, we can calculate the gauge pressure:
[tex]P = 1025 Kg/m^3.9.8m/s^2.690m[/tex]
Calculating this expression gives us a gauge pressure of approximately 68.01 MPa.
To learn more about pressure refer:
https://brainly.com/question/8033367
#SPJ11
what is the wavelength (in meters) of an am station radio wave of frequency 550 khz ?
We can use the following formula to calculate the wavelength of a radio wave: wavelength = speed of light / frequency
The speed of light in a vacuum is approximately 3.00 x 10^8 meters per second. However, radio waves travel slightly slower than the speed of light in a vacuum, so we'll use a slightly lower value of 2.998 x 10^8 meters per second for our calculation.
The frequency of the AM station radio wave is given as 550 kHz. We need to convert this to units of hertz (Hz), which is the SI unit of frequency. To do this, we can multiply the frequency in kHz by 1000:
frequency = 550 kHz x 1000 = 550,000 Hz
Now we can substitute the speed of light and frequency into the formula:
wavelength = speed of light / frequency
wavelength = 2.998 x 10^8 m/s / 550,000 Hz
Calculating this gives:
wavelength = 545.09 meters
Therefore, the wavelength of an AM station radio wave of frequency 550 kHz is approximately 545.09 meters.
To know more about wavelength refer here
https://brainly.com/question/31143857#
#SPJ11
Select the sets of conditions that will produce a spontaneous process (AGO). Select all that apply. Incorrect responses will be penalized, AH<0; AS > 0: all temperatures AH<0:AS < 0: low temperatures AH> 0: As <0; all tempeartures AH>0; AS > 0: low temperatures
The sets of conditions that produce a spontaneous process are ΔH < 0; ΔS > 0 (all temperatures) and ΔH > 0; ΔS > 0 (low temperatures).
A spontaneous process is determined by the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) equation: ΔG = ΔH - TΔS. There are four given conditions:
1. ΔH < 0; ΔS > 0: Since both ΔH and ΔS are favorable, the process is spontaneous at all temperatures.
2. ΔH < 0; ΔS < 0: The process may be spontaneous at low temperatures if ΔH dominates over TΔS.
3. ΔH > 0; ΔS < 0: Both ΔH and ΔS are unfavorable, and the process is not spontaneous at any temperature.
4. ΔH > 0; ΔS > 0: The process is spontaneous at low temperatures when the favorable ΔS dominates over the unfavorable ΔH.
Thus, the first and fourth conditions lead to a spontaneous process.
Learn more about spontaneous process here:
https://brainly.com/question/30738654
#SPJ11
The two clay blocks in the previous question collide and stick together after the collision. There are no outside forces acting on the blocks. The total kinetic energy of the system before the collision is KE, and the total kinetic energy of the system after the collision is KEF. What is KEJ/KEF? A) 119 B) 1 C)3 D)4 E) 9
In an isolated system with no external forces, the law of conservation of kinetic energy states that the total kinetic energy before a collision is equal to the total kinetic energy after the collision. Therefore, option B is correct.
Kinetic energy is a form of energy associated with the motion of an object. It is defined as the energy an object possesses due to its velocity or speed. The kinetic energy of an object depends on its mass (m) and its velocity (v).
Kinetic energy is a scalar quantity and is typically measured in joules (J) in the International System of Units (SI).
Learn more about kinetic energy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/999862
#SPJ12
The weight of passengers on a roller coaster increases by 53% as the car goes through a dip with a 33m radius of curvature.What is the car's speed at the bottom of the dip?
The speed of the car at the bottom of the dip is approximately 18.0 m/s.
To solve this problem, we can use the formula for centripetal force:
F = m*v^2 / r
where F is the centripetal force, m is the mass of the roller coaster car and passengers, v is the speed of the car, and r is the radius of curvature.
We know that the weight of the passengers increases by 53%, which means their mass also increases by 53%. Let's say the original mass of the car and passengers is m0, then the new mass is:
m = m0 * 1.53
We also know that the radius of curvature is 33m. So we can rewrite the formula as:
F = m0 * 1.53 * v^2 / 33
Now we need to find the speed of the car at the bottom of the dip. At this point, the centripetal force is equal to the weight of the car and passengers, which we can calculate using their increased mass:
F = m * g
where g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s^2).
Putting these equations together, we get:
m0 * 1.53 * v^2 / 33 = m * g
Substituting m = m0 * 1.53, we get:
m0 * 1.53 * v^2 / 33 = m0 * 1.53 * g
Simplifying, we get:
v^2 = 33 * g
Taking the square root, we get:
v = sqrt(33 * g)
Plugging in g = 9.81 m/s^2, we get:
v = sqrt(323.93) ≈ 18.0 m/s
Learn more about speed here:-
https://brainly.com/question/17661499
#SPJ11
The red curve shows how the capacitor charges after the switch is closed at t=0 Which curve shows the capacitor charging if the value of the resistor is reduced? - Q A B С D -0 t
The Curve C shows the capacitor charging if the value of the resistor is reduced.
If the value of the resistor is reduced, the capacitor will charge at a faster rate. This is because the time constant (RC) of the circuit will be decreased, where R is the resistance and C is the capacitance. The time constant represents the time it takes for the capacitor to charge to 63.2% of its maximum voltage when the switch is closed.
The curve that shows the capacitor charging if the value of the resistor is reduced would be curve C. This curve will have a steeper slope than the original curve (curve A) because the capacitor will be charging more quickly. The final voltage on the capacitor will be the same, but it will reach that voltage faster.
It is important to note that if the resistor is decreased too much, the circuit may become unstable and the capacitor may not charge properly. It is also important to ensure that the new resistor value is within the range of acceptable values for the circuit and that it can handle the power dissipation.
In summary, reducing the value of the resistor in a RC circuit will result in a faster charging time for the capacitor and a steeper slope in the charging curve, as seen in curve C. However, it is important to ensure that the new resistor value is within acceptable limits and that the circuit remains stable.
Know more about capacitor here:
https://brainly.com/question/21851402
#SPJ11
The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :
The red curve shows how the capacitor charges after the switch is closed at t=0 Which curve shows the capacitor charging if the value of the resistor is reduced?
a negative charge of 2 C and a positive charge of 3 C are separated by a distance of 40m. What is the force between the two charges?
There is a 3.375 Newton force between the two charges.
F = (k × q1 × q2) / r²
where F is the force, k is the Coulomb constant (k = 9 109 N/m2/C2), q1 and q2 are the charges' magnitudes, and r is their separation from one another.
In this instance, a 40 m gap separates a 2 C negative charge from a 3 C positive charge. The force will be attractive because opposing charges attract one another. As a result, we consider the charge's magnitude to be positive in the equation. When the values in the equation are substituted, we obtain:
F = (9 × 10⁹ N·m²/C²) × (2 C) × (3 C) / (40 m)²
(Rounded to three decimal places) F = 3.375 N
Therefore, there is a 3.375 Newton force between the two charges.
Learn more about force:
https://brainly.com/question/30526425
#SPJ1
A lump of lead is heated to high temperature. Another lump of lead that is twice as large is heated to a lower temperature. Which lump of lead appears bluer?a. Both lumps look the same color b. The cooler lump appears bluer c. The hotter lump appears bluer. D. The larger one looks bluer. E. Cannot tell which lump looks bluer
b. The cooler lump appears bluer. the color of an object is determined by its temperature and the corresponding wavelength of light it emits.
At higher temperatures, objects emit shorter wavelength light, which appears bluer.
Since the first lump of lead is heated to a higher temperature, it emits bluer light compared to the second lump of lead, which is heated to a lower temperature. Therefore, the cooler lump appears bluer.
Learn more about wavelength here:
https://brainly.com/question/31322456
#SPJ11
A material has the properties Sut = 36 kpsi, Suc = 35 kpsi, and εf = 0.045. Using the
Coulomb-Mohr theory, determine factor of safety for the following states of plane stress
(a) σx = 12 kpsi, σy = 0 kpsi, τxy = –8 kpsi
(b) σx = -10 kpsi, σy = 15 kpsi, τxy = 10 kpsi
The factor of safety using the Coulomb-Mohr theory, for the state of plane stress (a) σx = 12 kpsi, σy = 0 kpsi, τxy = –8 kpsi is 0.389, and (b) σx = -10 kpsi, σy = 15 kpsi, τxy = 10 kpsi is 0.136
Sut = 36 kpsi, Suc = 35 kpsi, εf = 0.045
(a) σx = 12 kpsi, σy = 0 kpsi, τxy = –8 kpsi
The maximum and minimum principal stresses are given by:
[tex]\sigma_1 = \frac{{\sigma_x + \sigma_y}}{2} + \sqrt{\left(\frac{{\sigma_x - \sigma_y}}{2}\right)^2 + \tau_{xy}^2}[/tex]
[tex]\sigma_2 = \frac{{\sigma_x + \sigma_y}}{2} - \sqrt{\left(\frac{{\sigma_x - \sigma_y}}{2}\right)^2 + \tau_{xy}^2}[/tex]
Substituting the values, we get:
σ1 = 14 kpsi, σ2 = -2 kpsi
The factor of safety based on the Coulomb-Mohr theory is given by:
[tex]FS = \left(\frac{\sigma_1}{S_{ut}}\right) + \left(\frac{\sigma_2}{S_{uc}}\right)[/tex]
Substituting the values, we get:
FS = (14/36) + (-2/35)
FS = 0.389
(b) σx = -10 kpsi, σy = 15 kpsi, τxy = 10 kpsi
The maximum and minimum principal stresses are given by:
[tex]\sigma_1 = \frac{{\sigma_x + \sigma_y}}{2} + \sqrt{\left(\frac{{\sigma_x - \sigma_y}}{2}\right)^2 + \tau_{xy}^2}\\[/tex]
[tex]\sigma_2 = \frac{{\sigma_x + \sigma_y}}{2} - \sqrt{\left(\frac{{\sigma_x - \sigma_y}}{2}\right)^2 + \tau_{xy}^2}[/tex]
Substituting the values, we get:
σ1 = 23 kpsi, σ2 = -18 kpsi
The factor of safety based on the Coulomb-Mohr theory is given by:
[tex]FS = \left(\frac{\sigma_1}{S_{ut}}\right) + \left(\frac{\sigma_2}{S_{uc}}\right)[/tex]
Substituting the values, we get:
FS = (23/36) + (-18/35)
FS = 0.136
Therefore, the factor of safety at the optimum solution for (a) is 0.389 and for (b) is 0.136.
Learn more about Coulomb-Mohr theory at: https://brainly.com/question/15740246
#SPJ11
Suppose that you have a reflection diffraction grating with n= 110 lines per millimeter. Light from a sodium lamp passes through the grating and is diffracted onto a distant screen.
Part A
Two visible lines in the sodium spectrum have wavelengths 498 nm and 569 nm. What is the angular separation Δθ of the first maxima of these spectral lines generated by this diffraction grating?
Express your answer in degrees to two significant figures.
Δθ =
The angular separation between the first maxima of these spectral lines is approximately 3.1°, and the angular separation between the second maxima is approximately 3.6°
The angular separation between adjacent maxima in a diffraction grating is given by the equation:
sin(Δθ) = mλ/d
where m is the order of the maximum, λ is the wavelength of light, d is the spacing between adjacent lines on the grating, and Δθ is the angular separation between adjacent maxima.
In this problem, we are given that the diffraction grating has n = 110 lines per millimeter. Therefore, the spacing between adjacent lines is:
d = 1/n = 1/110 mm = 0.00909 mm
Converting this to meters, we get:
d = 9.09 × 10^-6 m
For the first maximum (m = 1), using the wavelength λ = 498 nm, we have:
sin(Δθ) = (1)(498 × 10^-9 m)/(9.09 × 10^-6 m) = 0.0547
Taking the inverse sine of both sides, we get:
Δθ = sin^-1(0.0547) = 3.14°
Rounding this to two significant figures, we get:
Δθ ≈ 3.1°
Similarly, for the second wavelength λ = 569 nm, we have:
sin(Δθ) = (1)(569 × 10^-9 m)/(9.09 × 10^-6 m) = 0.0627
Taking the inverse sine of both sides, we get:
Δθ = sin^-1(0.0627) = 3.6°
Rounding this to two significant figures, we get:
Δθ ≈ 3.6°
Therefore, the angular separation between the first maxima of these spectral lines is approximately 3.1°, and the angular separation between the second maxima is approximately 3.6°.
To know more about angular separation refer here
https://brainly.com/question/31858807#
#SPJ11
a 20 cm × 20 cm square loop has a resistance of 0.14 ω . a magnetic field perpendicular to the loop is b=4t−2t2, where b is in tesla and t is in seconds.
PART A: What is the current in the loop at t=0.0s?
PART B: What is the current in the loop at t=1.0s?
PART C: What is the current in the loop at t=2.0s?
The current in the loop at t=0.0s is zero since there is no change in the magnetic field at that time. The current in the loop at t=1.0s is -2.9 A. The current in the loop at t=2.0s is -5.7 A.
PART B: The current in the loop at t=1.0s can be calculated using Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, which states that the induced emf in a loop is equal to the negative rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop. In this case, the magnetic flux through the loop is equal to the product of the magnetic field and the area of the loop, or Φ=B*A.
Therefore, the induced emf is given by ε=-dΦ/dt=-B*dA/dt=-B*A*(Δt)^-1. The current in the loop is then given by I=ε/R, where R is the resistance of the loop. Plugging in the given values, we get:[tex]\phi = (4-2(1))^2*(0.2)^2=0.24 Tm[/tex]²
ε=-dΦ/dt=-0.4 T·m²/s
I=ε/R=-2.9 A.
PART C: The current in the loop at t=2.0s can be calculated using the same method as in part B, but with the magnetic field value at t=2.0s. Plugging in the given values, we get: [tex]\phi= (4-2(2))^2*(0.2)^2=0.08 Tm^{2}[/tex]
ε=-dΦ/dt=-0.8 T·m²/s
I=ε/R=-5.7 A.
To know more about current, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30764391#
#SPJ11