Answer:
"Seward's Folly" was a nickname given to the United States' acquisition of Alaska from Russia in 1867. Many people at the time believed it was a foolish move because Alaska was seen as a distant, cold, and inhospitable place with few resources and no strategic value. However, in the years following the acquisition, it was discovered that Alaska had rich deposits of gold, oil, and other minerals, and it became an important part of the United States. It also has strategic military value, as it is close to Russia and has played a role in the defense of the US. So, while it may have seemed like a mistake at the time, the acquisition of Alaska has proved to be a valuable asset for the United States.
Explanation:
How did the burial of a wealthy person differ from that of an enslaved person? Choose two answers.
The wealthy had a more complex process.
The wealthy were wrapped in their clothes.
The wealthy had a ceremony.
The wealthy had perfumes in their bodies.
The wealthy had a ceremony.
The wealthy were wrapped in their clothes.
Explanation:The burial of a wealthy person differed from that of an enslaved person because the wealthy person typically had more resources and social status, which allowed for a more elaborate and costly burial process. This often included a ceremony or ritual to honor the deceased, as well as the use of fine clothing and perfumes to prepare the body for burial. In contrast, the burial of an enslaved person was often more basic and simple, with little attention given to the details of the process. Enslaved individuals may not have had access to the same resources or social status as wealthy individuals, and therefore may not have received the same level of burial rites.
HOPE IT HELPS!Answer: A & D
Explanation:
the guy on top of me was WRONG
eastern and west immigration characteristics
Eastern immigration refers to the influx of people from countries in Eastern Europe and Asia to the United States. Some of the characteristics of Eastern immigration include:
.Many Eastern European immigrants came to the United States to escape poverty, persecution, and political upheaval in their home countries.
.Many Eastern European immigrants were members of minority groups, such as Jews, Poles, and Czechs, and often faced discrimination upon arrival in the United States.
.Many Eastern European immigrants were skilled workers, such as miners, factory workers, and farmers, and often took jobs in heavy industry or agriculture.
.Eastern European immigrants often formed tight-knit communities in the United States, preserving their cultural traditions and languages.
Western immigration refers to the influx of people from countries in Western Europe, Canada, and Mexico to the United States. Some of the characteristics of Western immigration include:
.Many Western European immigrants came to the United States for economic opportunities and to escape poverty in their home countries.
.Western European immigrants were often better educated and skilled than Eastern European immigrants and often took jobs in professional and white-collar occupations.
.Western European immigrants often assimilated more quickly into American society and were less likely to form tight-knit ethnic communities.
.Western European immigrants were less likely to face the same level of discrimination and hostility that Eastern European immigrants often encountered.
It is worth noting that this are general characteristics and there are many exception, some Eastern European immigrants were well-educated and came to the United States for other reasons. Also some Mexican immigrants were skilled workers and some Western European immigrants formed ethnic communities.
Complete question :-
What are the characteristics of eastern and west immigration?
To learn more about immigration :-
https://brainly.com/question/11266058
How might the fall of Rome affect the development of separate societies in the East and West during the middle ages socially, politically, and economically?
(Minimum two paragraphs)
The disintegration of the Roman empire freed Europe from rule by a single power.
What is the meaning of the Roman Empire?The post-Republican era of ancient Rome was known as the Roman Empire. It was a kingdom with substantial territorial holdings in Europe, North Africa, as well as Western Asia that was governed by emperors.
One of the biggest and most significant civilizations in history, the Roman Empire lasted for more than a thousand years.
The Visigoths under Alaric's command invaded Rome in 410 CE and took control of the Roman Empire's capital city. The Visigoths rampaged through the city, destroying everything in their path as they burned, pillaged, and robbed. Three days were spent in the robbery.
Learn more about the Roman Empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/11415671
#SPJ1
The president and the vice president are elected to _________________-year terms.
Group of answer choices
four
three
five
two
Answer: Two terms with each being 4 years so in total they can sever 8 years
Explanation:
project selection helps to ensure that no project affects the status of other
Answer: i ensured my status by helping others
Explanation: ensure yo statuses etc
PROCWrite a procedural essay with media that is 1 1/2-2 pages in length. Clearly state your topic, and include all steps necessary to complete the procedure. You will submit your prewriting and planning documents along with your essay. Before you submit your assignment, make sure you have Used second-person point of view Used transitions Used vocabulary relevant to your topic and defined it, if needed. Used language appropriate for your audience. Used an adjective phrase. Included media that supports or explains your procedure. Review the grading rubric before you submit your paper so you can ensure you are meeting the assignment requirements
Answer:
Write the essay
Explanation:
Do what you are writing of the topic and use lots of research.
What happened to nationalism throughout the world following World War II?
O It became culturally unacceptable due to the horrors that German hyper-nationalism committed.
O It intensified throughout much of the world, leading to widespread independence movements.
O It increased in Europe but all but disappeared in Africa and Southeast Asia.
O It led to a third wave of imperialism and the creation of new overseas empires.
the idea of nationalism became more nuanced, with many countries seeking to balance national interests with global cooperation and shared values.
What is brief history?
Following World War II, nationalism intensified throughout much of the world, leading to widespread independence movements. Many countries that were once colonies of European powers sought to establish their own national identities and assert their sovereignty.
This was particularly evident in Africa and Southeast Asia, where many countries gained independence from European colonial powers in the decades following World War II. However, the horrors of German hyper-nationalism during the war also contributed to a growing awareness of the dangers of extreme nationalism and the need for international cooperation to prevent future conflicts.
As a result, the idea of nationalism became more nuanced, with many countries seeking to balance national interests with global cooperation and shared values.
To know more about World War related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ1
Answer: B
It intensified throughout much of the world, leading to widespread independence movements.
Explanation: Took the quiz, got it right <3 good luck!
Why are primary sources important when studying historical events?
please help!!
Once you have completed the “Digging Into Anthropology” activity in Chapter 4, please answer the following questions to the best of your ability.
1. Describe the results of your survey. What trends did you find in your data regarding why your participants classify themselves the way they do and what that classification means to them? Did any of your participants question the racial/ethnic classification system used in your society? If so, how so, and if not, why do you think they did not?
2. How do you classify your race and ethnicity? Why do you choose the classification you do, and what does it mean to you? Based on your own experience and the responses from your participants, how would you evaluate your society's racial and ethnic categories? Would you revise them? If so, why, and if not, why not?
3. Based on your experience with this activity and the content of this chapter, what role do you think anthropology plays—or should play—in challenging racism?
Answer:
1. The results of my survey indicated that most participants classified themselves in terms of their racial and ethnic backgrounds, with some also noting the importance of their cultural heritage. Most of the participants felt that their classification was an important part of their identity and that it was important to recognize and celebrate the diversity of backgrounds and cultures. A few participants did question the racial/ethnic classification system and felt that it was too restrictive and didn’t allow for self-expression and personal identity.
2. I classify myself as a mixed-race individual, with my heritage being a combination of African American, European, and Native American. For me, this classification is important because it reflects my unique identity and allows me to celebrate the diversity of my heritage. I believe that our society's racial and ethnic categories need to be more inclusive and should allow for more self-expression and personal identity. I would not revise them, however, as I think it is important to recognize and celebrate the diversity of backgrounds and cultures.
3. Anthropology can play a significant role in challenging racism by providing a deeper understanding of the various cultures, backgrounds, and identities that make up our society. Anthropologists can help to create a more inclusive and equitable society by researching and disseminating information about different cultures and identities, as well as advocating for greater recognition and appreciation of diversity. Additionally, anthropologists can provide valuable insight into how racism and discrimination affect different groups and how we can work to create a more equitable society.
Explanation:
Which quote is pro imperialism and against imperialism?
The Quotes and there distributions
A) is pro imperialism
B) is against imperialism
C) is pro imperialism
D) is pro imperialism
What is pro-imperialism?Generally, Pro-imperialism is a stance or belief in favor of the expansion of a country's territory or influence, often through colonization or military conquest. This may involve the belief that it is beneficial for the country and/or the people being conquered or colonized. Some argue that it brings civilization and modernization to "uncivilized" or "backward" peoples and that it is a natural and necessary aspect of a country's growth and development.
However, this perspective is highly controversial and criticized, as it has been used to justify the exploitation and oppression of colonized peoples and the theft of their land and resources.
Read more about pro imperialism
https://brainly.com/question/2193076
#SPJ1
CQ
Which quote is pro imperialism and against imperialism?
A) God has not been preparing the English- aking and Teutonic peoples for a thousand years for nothing but vain and idle self-admiration. No....He has made us adept in government that we may administer government among savage and senile peoples....He has marked the American people as His chosen nation to finally lead in the redemption of the world."
B) "A self-governing state cannot accept sovereignty over an unwilling people. The United States cannot act upon the ancient heresy that might makes right."
C) "Thus...duty and interest alike, duty of the highest kind and interest of the highest and best kind, impose upon us the retention of the Philippines, the development of the islands, and the expansion of dur Eastern commerce."
D) "The two great needs of mankind, that all men may be lifted into the light of the highest Christian civilization, are, first, a pure, spiritual Christianity, and, second, civil liberty.... It follows then, that the Anglo-Saxon, as the great representative of these two ideas, the depository of these two great blessings, sustains peculiar relations to the
world's future, is divinely commissioned to be, in a peculiar sense, his brother's keeper.
"I. Natural Rights of the Colonists as Men. All men have a right to remain in a state of nature as long as they please; and in case of intolerable oppression, civil or religious, to leave the society they belong to, and enter into another.
When men enter into society, it is by voluntary consent; and they have a right to demand and insist upon the performance of such conditions and previous limitations as form an equitable original compact.
Every natural right not expressly given up, or, from the nature of a social compact, necessarily ceded, remains."—The Rights of the Colonists, Samuel Adams, 1772
"So that the social pact will not become meaningless words, it tacitly includes this commitment, which alone gives power to the others: Whoever refuses to obey the general will shall be forced to obey it by the whole body politic, which means nothing else but that he will be forced to be free. This condition is indeed the one which by dedicating each citizen to the fatherland gives him a guarantee against being personally dependent on other individuals. It is the condition which all political machinery depends on and which alone makes political undertakings legitimate. Without it, political actions become absurd, tyrannical, and subject to the most outrageous abuses."—Jean Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract, 1763
Which U.S. document balances ideas championed by Enlightenment philosophers with the idea of Social Commitment outlined by Rousseau? (1 point)
The Articles of Confederation
The Federalist No. 10
The Constitution
The Northwest Ordinance
Answer:
The Constitution
Explanation:
Which statement correctly summarizes a motivation for imperialism?
Answer:
c
Explanation:
a and d u can cross out so i believe its c
What was the main event described in the article? What were the causes of this event? Describe each cause by citing specific details from the article and explaining how it contributed to the main event. The history of the 19th amendment newsla. NEED IT TODAY.
Politically unfair treatment of women, financial discrimination against women, and societal rejection of the stereotypical American lady were the main drivers of the women's rights movement between 1940 and 1975.
What was the National Woman Suffrage Association's major objective?The NWSA advocated a number of measures that intended to make women equal members of society in addition to calling for a constitutional amendment to guarantee women the right to vote.
What does the National Women's Party stand for?For more than a century, the National Woman's Party (NWP) fought for the rights of women. Members began protesting, marching, and demanding gender equality in 1913; they then used these experiences to continue their efforts.
To Know more about financial discrimination
https://brainly.com/question/17185604
#SPJ1
The church at the portrayed death as
Answer:
The church portrayed death as an inevitable part of life and a gateway to the afterlife.
Explanation:
A purpose of government in the United States is to
Protecting, upholding law and order, resolving social disputes, maintaining a healthy economy, and offering public services are all goals of the US government.
What is a social dispute?Social conflict arises when two or more persons disagree with one another in social interactions and use their reciprocal social power to promote their own interests while obstructing the other person's attempts to do the same.What are examples of disputes?For centuries, there has been debate over the text's author. a section of the city where two drug gangs are vying for control of the area Noun They were unable to come to an agreement. The management and the employees are engaged in a labour dispute. There is a land dispute involving the two farmers.To know more about social disputes, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7553943
#SPJ1
After you ask someone if they are okay and they say "Yes, just got a lot going on" Can you reply back "What's going on?" or that's disrespectful?
Sectionalism became prevalent not only between the North and South, but the West as well. Explain how the purchase of the Louisiana Territory and western expansion contributed to increased sectionalism in the United States. Do we still have sectionalism in the US today? Give examples and explain your answer.
Be sure to answer both questions!
Rubric to grade by:
Sectionalism is explained; information shows a clear understanding of what sectionalism is: 10 points
Opinion on the impact of the Louisiana Purchase on sectionalism is clearly defined: 7 points
Opinion on the impact of sectionalism on modern society is well defined; historical evidence is included to support opinion: 7 points
Spelling/grammar: 1 point
Yes, we still do have sectionalism in the US today. And this is seen in different sectors of the economy.
What is the issue of Sectionalism about?Sectionalism refers to the division of a country or society into different regions or sections, each with distinct political, economic, or cultural characteristics.
In the United States, sectionalism emerged in the early 19th century, primarily between the North and the South, but also between the West. The purchase of the Louisiana Territory and western expansion contributed to increased sectionalism in the United States.
The Louisiana Purchase in 1803, which doubled the size of the United States, brought a vast amount of new land under U.S. control. The acquisition of this territory opened up opportunities for westward expansion, but it also created tensions between the different regions of the country.
Therefore, North and the South had different economic systems and different attitudes towards slavery, and the addition of new territory created new opportunities for conflict.
Learn more about Sectionalism from
https://brainly.com/question/7665837
#SPJ1
When historians investigate how the Spanish and Portuguese built their empires, they notice
When historians investigate how the Spanish and Portuguese built their empires, they notice many similarities between how the two countries engaged in this process. Option A
What are the Spanish and Portuguese empires?Generally, During the Age of Exploration and Conquest, which started in the late 15th century and continued until the late 18th century, Spain and Portugal, respectively, were the countries that governed the lands and colonies that came to be known as the Spanish and Portuguese empires.
The Spanish Empire was one of the greatest empires in world history.
It stretched over four continents, including Europe, North and South America, and parts of Africa and Asia.
The Portuguese Empire was also a very extensive empire, but its primary objective was to colonize Brazil as well as other areas in Africa and Asia.
Read more about the Spanish and Portuguese empires
https://brainly.com/question/8098815
#SPJ1
Which of the following did preachers Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield believe in
Preachers Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield believe in: D. establishing a personal relationship with God.
Who was George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards ?George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards were man of God who were know as a Christian leader during their life time.
Both of them were as well known as a preacher of the word of God due to the passion they both have for Christ. They both believed that people should tend to have a personal relationship with God.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards here:https://brainly.com/question/28812374
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Which of the following did preachers Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield believe in?
A. hierarchies within the church system
B. ritualistic worship
C. church is the only place God can be found
D. establishing a personal relationship with God
Much evidence supports the theory of continental drift. One piece of evidence is the complementary shapes of Earth's coastlines.
Which example is another piece of evidence?
O testing of ocean water
O similar fossils found on different continents
O rock structures found only on one continent
O patterns of ancient rainfall
Similar fossils found on different continents.
What is the evidence for the continental drift theory?The fit of the continents, the distribution of prehistoric fossils, rocks, and mountain ranges, as well as the placements of prehistoric climatic zones, were all used as evidence for continental drift. Their theory of continental drift is supported by a number of lines of evidence, including the fit of the continents, paleoclimate indicators, truncated geologic structures, and fossils.
Alfred Wegener put forth the Theory of Continental Drift in 1912. His theory was supported by a number of pieces of evidence, including fossils, rocks, glacial traces, coal deposits, and the way the continents fit together like a jigsaw puzzle.
To know more about paleoclimate :
https://brainly.com/question/26007315
#SPJ1
Which was Peter the Great responsible for?
Answer:
Modernized Russia
Russia made incredible progress in the development of its economy and trade, education, science and culture, and foreign policy.
PLS CHOOSE ME AS BRAINLIEST!
What was it like to be a soldier in the Continental Army?
Answer:
Life in the Continental Army was difficult. It was mundane and monotonous. Generally, when not engaged in combat, soldiers in the Continental Army served three duties: fatigue or manual labor, such as digging vaults (latrines), clearing fields, or erecting fortifications.What statement best summarizes the population decline of Native Americans?
A: Native Americans encountered many European diseases, but were able to successfully overcome them.
B: A civil war among Native Americans killed many and left many wounded.
C: Native Americans were affected the most by malnutrition, which led to many Native Americans dying.
D: Hard labor, malnutrition, and diseases from Europeans led millions of Native Americans to die.
Answer:
Option d
Explanation:
its because all the other options are not appropriate. The Spanish and Portuguese brought small to the native America’s and conquered the land
Mark me as the brainliest pls
Answer:
d
Explanation:
What was important about the Lewis and Clark Expedition?
________
(reporting wrong answers/spam)
(answer correctly for brainly)
________
1. It found a faster way for ships to get to the port of New Orleans.
2. It explored territory acquired in the Louisiana Purchase.
3. It revealed that gold was available in Kentucky.
4. It found a path through the Cumberland Gap.
The important aspects of the Lewis and Clark Expedition was option 2. It explored territory acquired in the Louisiana Purchase, which greatly expanded knowledge about the western region of the United States.
Who were Lewis and Clark expedition?The Lewis and Clark Expedition, also known as the Corps of Discovery Expedition, was an exploration journey undertaken by Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, commissioned by President Thomas Jefferson in 1803.
The expedition's main objective was to explore and map the newly acquired territory of the Louisiana Purchase, find a practical route across the western part of North America, and establish American presence in the region.
They set out from St. Louis in May 1804 and reached the Pacific Ocean in November 1805, making significant contributions to the understanding of the West and its resources.
learn more about Lewis and Clark expedition: https://brainly.com/question/14702270
#SPJ1
Who were the principal patrons of Haydn and Mozart, and did the two composers maintain a good relationship with their respective patrons? Explain your answer.
I NEED HELPPPPPPP, PLSSS
They did continue to have a wonderful friendship. The Esterhazy family and Prince Paul Anton Esterhazy are Haydn's main supporters. Mozart's main patron is Prince Archbishop Hieronymus Colloredo of Salzburg.
Were Mozart and Haydn friends?According to sources written at the time, Mozart and Haydn rapidly grew close friends and expressed mutual admiration for one another. The two composers collaborated in impromptu quartets in Vienna throughout the 1780s, with Haydn playing violin and Mozart playing viola.
The Baron, a prominent figure in Vienna in the 1780s, was a man who sincerely liked music; . Along with Mozart, he also gave Beethoven and Haydn financial support—not in the form of a wage, but rather through the distribution of very significant gratuities.
To learn more about Mozart and Haydn
https://brainly.com/question/29024066
#SPJ1
GIVING BRAINLIEST read the short document and answer please!
Answer:
desire of power and conflict and the other one is
Explanation:
the citizens are always suffering wanting desire of power
Describe an oligopoly
Answer:
An oligopoly is a market structure with few firms. None of the firms can keep the other firms from having significant influence/higher ranking
Explanation:
hard to word but here u go
why was there a push for change in Georgia by people like the Bourbon Triumvirate and Henry Grady?
HELP!!!!!
The Bourbon Triumvirate and Henry Grady, who were leaders in Georgia during the late 19th century, pushed for change in the state because they believed that the traditional agricultural economy of the state was holding it back from reaching its full potential.
Why did Henry Grady Push for Change in Georgia?The Bourbon Triumvirate and Henry Grady advocated for industrialization and modernization, and promoted the idea of a "New South" that would be more economically and socially progressive. They also believed that the state should move away from its reliance on cotton as the main source of income, and instead focus on other industries such as manufacturing and transportation.
Additionally, they were vocal critic of the then-existing racial segregation and supported for civil rights for the black population of the state.
Learn more about Henry Grady here: https://brainly.com/question/8142884
#SPJ1
1. Was the law authorizing a moment of silence for meditation or voluntary prayer an attempt to
establish a religion?
2. Is a child's First Amendment right to freedom of religion violated if voluntary prayer is allowed
in the school?
No, the law authorizing a moment of silence for meditation or voluntary prayer is not an attempt to establish a religion.
What is law authorising?Law authorising is the process of granting legal permission for a person, organization, or entity to take a certain action. This permission is typically granted by a government body, such as a legislature or court, and is often referred to as a form of delegation of authority. Law authorising can be used to grant permission for a variety of activities, including public works, tax exemptions, and other government-regulated activities. It is an important part of the legal process that ensures that certain activities are properly regulated and that the public is protected.
It is meant to provide a moment of respite and reflection for students and is not intended to coerce or require any kind of religious activity. It is a way of allowing students to be mindful of the moment and to practice self-care, in whatever form they feel is beneficial.
A child's First Amendment right to freedom of religion is not violated if voluntary prayer is allowed in school. The Supreme Court has consistently held that public schools may not compel or coerce students to participate in prayer or other religious activities. However, the court has also recognized that students may engage in voluntary prayer during the moment of silence as long as it does not disrupt the educational process and does not interfere with the rights of other students. Therefore, voluntary prayer is permissible in the school environment as long as it does not violate the rights of others or interfere with school activities.
To know more about law authorizing click-
https://brainly.com/question/10745191
#SPJ1
Constitutional Reporter
Imagine you are a political reporter during the early years of the republic. Write a brief news arlicle about the debate over the U.S.
Constitution using the following words correctly.
Checks and balances ratification
Federalist
Antifederalists
Bill of Rights
Although many Federalists at the start argued against the necessity of a consignment of rights to make sure passage of the Constitution, they promised to add amendments to it particularly protecting character liberties.
Did federalists or Anti-Federalists aid the bill of rights?Antifederalists argued that a consignment of rights used to be essential because, the supremacy clause in combination with the integral and appropriate and established welfare clauses would permit implied powers that could endanger rights. Federalists rejected the proposition that a consignment of rights was once needed.
However, they did unite in their objection to the Constitution as it used to be proposed for ratification in 1787. The Anti-Federalists argued towards the enlargement of country wide power. They preferred small localized governments with limited countrywide authority as was exercised underneath the Articles of Confederation.
Learn more about Anti-Federalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/412270#SPJ1