a gas is at 35.0°c and 3.50 l. what is the temperature of the gas if the volume is increased to 7.00 l? 343�C
70.0�C
616�C
17.5�C
1.16�C

Measurements can be analysed to calculate the frictional torque on the rotating platform are mentioned here: through slope of angular velocity, moment of inertia, net torque.

Find the slope of the angular velocity vs. time graph to get the platform's angular acceleration. Using the first and last data points, angular acceleration =

(final angular velocity - initial angular velocity) / (final time - initial time).

Calculate the platform's moment of inertia given mass and dimensions. Torque = moment of inertia x angular acceleration can be used to compute the torque needed to accelerate the platform from rest to its final angular velocity.

Platform net torque: The platform's net torque is the difference between the hanging mass's applied torque and frictional torque. The formula for applied torque is mass x acceleration due to gravity x distance. Subtracting the applied torque from the torque calculated in step 2 yields frictional torque.

Calculate the frictional torque and analyse it to find its causes and magnitude. Bearing resistance and other mechanical components of the rotating platform cause frictional torque. To evaluate bearing and component performance and wear, it can be compared to the theoretical value.

To know more about frictional torque

https://brainly.com/question/31111148

#SPJ4

The amount of heat required to raise the temperature of 125 g of water from 12°C to 88°C is 9500 calories.

We may use the following formula to calculate the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of 125 g of water from 12°C to 88°C:

Q = m * c * ΔT

where Q is the required heat (in calories), m is the mass of water (in grammes), c is the specific heat capacity of water (1 cal/g°C), and T is the temperature change (in degrees Celsius).

So, when we plug in the given values, we get:

Q = 125 g * 1 cal/g·°C * (88°C - 12°C)

Q = 125 g * 1 cal/g * 76°C

Q = 9500 cal

As a result, 9500 calories are required to raise the temperature of 125 g of water from 12°C to 88°C.

For such more question on temperature:

https://brainly.com/question/26866637

#SPJ11

The heat required to raise the temperature of 125 g of water from 12°C to 88°C is 9500 calories.
To calculate the heat required to raise the temperature of 125 g of water from 12°C to 88°C, we need to use the formula Q = mcΔT, where Q is the heat required, m is the mass of the water, c is the specific heat capacity of water, and ΔT is the change in temperature.

Using the given values, we can calculate the heat required as follows:

Q = (125 g) x (1 cal/g·°C) x (88°C - 12°C)
Q = 125 x 76
Q = 9500 cal

Therefore, the heat required to raise the temperature of 125 g of water from 12°C to 88°C is 9500 calories.

It is important to note that the specific heat capacity of a substance is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of 1 gram of the substance by 1 degree Celsius. In this case, the specific heat capacity of water is 1 cal/g·°C, which means that it takes 1 calorie of heat to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water by 1 degree Celsius.

learn more about temperature here: brainly.com/question/11464844

#SPJ11

The formula that can be used to calculate the relativistic kinetic energy (KE) of an object with a rest mass m₀, and a mass m when its speed v is very high is KE = (γm - m₀)c². The correct option is D).

According to Einstein's theory of special relativity, an object with a rest mass m₀ has an increased mass m when its speed v is very high. The relativistic kinetic energy formula takes into account this increased mass and is given by KE = (γm - m₀)c², where γ is the Lorentz factor and is equal to 1/√(1 - (v/c)²).

This formula shows that as an object's speed approaches the speed of light (c), its mass and kinetic energy increase towards infinity. The other options are incorrect because they do not take into account the increased mass of the object at high speeds.

Option A is the classical kinetic energy formula, B is the rest energy formula, and C is the rest energy plus classical kinetic energy formula. Option E is similar to option D, but it includes the rest energy in addition to the relativistic kinetic energy. Therefore, the correct option is D.

To know more about kinetic energy refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/26472013#

#SPJ11

Complete Question:

Which of the following formulas can be used to calculate the relativistic kinetic energy (KE) of an object with a rest mass mo, and a mass m when its speed v is very high?

A) KE = 1/2 m v^2

B) KE = (m - mo)c^2

C) KE = moc^2

D) KE = (γm - mo)c^2

E) KE = γmoc^2, where γ = 1/√(1 - (v/c)^2)

The engine's efficiency is 25%.

An engine's efficiency refers to the ratio of useful work done to the total energy input. In this case, the engine takes in 40 joules of energy, does 10 joules of work, and expels 30 joules of heat. To calculate the efficiency, you can use the following formula: Efficiency = (Work done / Energy input) x 100%.

For this engine, the efficiency would be (10 joules / 40 joules) x 100%, which equals 25%. This means that 25% of the energy input is converted into useful work, while the remaining 75% is lost as heat. An ideal engine would have a higher efficiency, meaning more of the input energy is converted into useful work. However, in reality, all engines lose some energy as heat due to factors such as friction and other inefficiencies.

To know more about the efficiency, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/30861596

#SPJ11

Air-vapor mixture at a pressure of 235 kpa has a dry-bulb temperature of 30 c and a wet-bulb temperature of 20 c, the relative humidity in percentage is 33.5%.

Air contains water vapor in the form of moisture. The amount of water vapor that air can hold is dependent on the temperature and pressure of the air. Relative humidity is the ratio of the amount of water vapor in the air to the maximum amount of water vapor the air can hold at a given temperature and pressure, expressed as a percentage.

To determine the relative humidity of an air-vapor mixture, we need to know the dry-bulb temperature, wet-bulb temperature, and pressure. The dry-bulb temperature is the ambient temperature measured by a regular thermometer, while the wet-bulb temperature is measured using a thermometer with a wet wick or cloth wrapped around its bulb. The wet-bulb temperature measures the temperature at which water evaporates from the wick, which is an indicator of the humidity of the air.

Using the given values, we can use a psychrometric chart or equations to calculate the relative humidity. However, using the simpler formula, we have:

   Calculate the saturation vapor pressure at the dry-bulb temperature:

       From a steam table, the saturation vapor pressure at 30°C is 4.246 kPa.

   Calculate the vapor pressure at the wet-bulb temperature:

       From a psychrometric chart or equations, the vapor pressure at 20°C with a wet-bulb depression of 10°C is 1.423 kPa.

   Calculate the relative humidity:

       Relative humidity = (vapor pressure / saturation vapor pressure) x 100%

       Relative humidity = (1.423 kPa / 4.246 kPa) x 100% = 33.5%

Therefore, the relative humidity of the air-vapor mixture is approximately 33.5%.

Learn more about relative humidity at: https://brainly.com/question/28042960

#SPJ11

Answer:Based on current knowledge and observations, the following objects are found mostly within the thin disk of the Milky Way:

- Population 1 stars

- Open star clusters

- Gaseous nebulae

Population 1 stars are relatively young and metal-rich stars, and they are found mostly in the thin disk of the Milky Way. Open star clusters are also predominantly found in the disk and consist of young, hot stars. Gaseous nebulae are clouds of gas and dust that are associated with star-forming regions and are mostly located in the disk of the Milky Way.

Population 2 stars, on the other hand, are typically older and metal-poor, and they are found in the halo and bulge of the Milky Way. Globular star clusters are also typically found in the halo and consist of old, metal-poor stars.

learn more about Milky Way

https://brainly.com/question/30714548?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ11

In the given statement, A rock attached to a string swings back and forth every 4.6 s then  the length of the string is approximately 13.53 meters.

To calculate the length of the string, we need to use the formula for the period of a pendulum, which is T = 2π√(L/g), where T is the period, L is the length of the string, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. In this case, we know that the period is 4.6 s, so we can plug that in and solve for L:
4.6 = 2π√(L/9.8)
2.3 = π√(L/9.8)
(2.3/π)^2 = L/9.8
1.16^2 × 9.8 = L
13.53 ≈ L
So the length of the string is approximately 13.53 meters. This makes sense, as longer strings have longer periods, so the rock on a longer string would take longer to swing back and forth. Therefore, by measuring the period of the pendulum, we can determine the length of the string.

To know more about string visit:

brainly.com/question/9499152

#SPJ11

An inductor is made up of two terminals and an insulated wire coil that either loops around air or around a core substance that boosts the magnetic field.

The relationship between peak current and peak emf in an inductor is given by:

I0 = ℰ0 / XL

where I0 is the peak current, ℰ0 is the peak emf, and XL is the inductive reactance.

Since the inductor is connected across an oscillating emf, we can assume that the frequency is constant. Therefore, the inductive reactance remains constant.

If the peak emf is doubled, then the peak current is given by:

I0' = (2ℰ0) / XL

I0' = 2(I0)

I0' = 2(2.00 A) = 4.00 A

The peak value of a sine wave is given by the root-mean-square (rms) value divided by the square root of 2:

I0peak = Irms / √2

For a sine wave with a peak current of 2.00 A, the rms current is:

Irms = 2.00 A / √2 = 1.41 A

Therefore, if the peak emf is doubled, the peak current will be:

I0peak' = Irms / √2

I0peak' = 1.41 A / √2 = 1.41 A

To know about Inductor visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15893850

#SPJ11

The new wavelength at which the spectral distribution has its maximum value is inversely proportional to the original temperature T1. As the original temperature was in the infrared region of the spectrum, the new wavelength would also be in the infrared region.

To start with, we know that the maximum of the spectral distribution of radiated power is at a specific wavelength in the infrared region of the spectrum. Let's call this wavelength λ1.
Now, if the total power radiated by the cavity doubles, it means that the power emitted at all wavelengths has increased by a factor of 2. This is known as the Stefan-Boltzmann law, which states that the total power radiated by a blackbody is proportional to the fourth power of its temperature (P ∝ T⁴).
Using this law, we can write:
P1/T1⁴ = P2/T2⁴
where P1 is the original power, T1 is the original temperature, P2 is the new power (which is 2P1), and T2 is the new temperature that we need to find.
Simplifying this equation, we get:
T2 = (2)⁴T1
T2 = 16T1
So the new temperature is 16 times the original temperature.
Now, to find the wavelength at which the new spectral distribution has its maximum value, we need to use Wien's displacement law. This law states that the wavelength at which a blackbody emits the most radiation is inversely proportional to its temperature.
Mathematically, we can write:
λ2T2 = b
where λ2 is the new wavelength we need to find, T2 is the new temperature we just calculated, and b is a constant known as Wien's displacement constant (which is approximately equal to 2.898 x 10⁻³ mK).
Substituting the values we know, we get:
λ2 x 16T1 = 2.898 x 10⁻³
Solving for λ2, we get:
λ2 = (2.898 x 10⁻³)/(16T1)
λ2 = 1.811 x 10⁻⁵ / T1
So the new wavelength at which the spectral distribution has its maximum value is inversely proportional to the original temperature T1. As the original temperature was in the infrared region of the spectrum, the new wavelength would also be in the infrared region.

To know more about wavelength visit ;

https://brainly.com/question/29243920

#SPJ11

According to the given statement, 10.0kg gun fires a 0.200kg bullet with an acceleration of 500.0m/s2, the force on the gun is 100 N.

The force on the gun can be calculated using Newton's second law of motion, which states that force (F) is equal to mass (m) multiplied by acceleration (a), or F = m × a. In this case, the mass of the gun is 10.0 kg, and the acceleration of the bullet is 500.0 m/s².
However, according to Newton's third law of motion, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Therefore, the force exerted on the bullet by the gun will be equal and opposite to the force exerted on the gun by the bullet.
First, calculate the force on the bullet: F_bullet = m_bullet × a_bullet = 0.200 kg × 500.0 m/s² = 100 N.
Since the force on the gun is equal and opposite, the force on the gun is -100 N (opposite direction). In terms of magnitude, the force on the gun is 100 N. The correct answer is option c: 100 N.

To know more about acceleration visit:

brainly.com/question/30660316

#SPJ11

The orbits of the electron in the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom are those in which the electron's angular momentum is quantized in integral multiples of h/2π.

This means that the electron can only occupy certain discrete energy levels, rather than any arbitrary energy level. This concept is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics, which describes the behavior of particles on a very small scale. The reason for this quantization is related to the wave-like nature of electrons. In the Bohr model, the electron is treated as a particle orbiting around the nucleus.

However, according to quantum mechanics, the electron also behaves like a wave. The wavelength of this wave is related to the momentum of the electron. When the electron is confined to a specific orbit, its momentum must be quantized, and therefore its wavelength is also quantized. The quantization of angular momentum in the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom has important consequences for the emission and absorption of radiation.

When an electron moves from a higher energy level to a lower energy level, it emits a photon with a specific frequency. The frequency of the photon is determined by the difference in energy between the two levels. Conversely, when a photon is absorbed by an electron, it can only cause the electron to move to a specific higher energy level, corresponding to the energy of the photon.

know more about angular momentum here:

https://brainly.com/question/4126751

#SPJ11

Material x has an index of refraction of about 0.425.

The critical angle is the angle of incidence at which the refracted angle of the light ray in the second medium is 90 degrees, or in other words, the angle at which the refracted ray becomes parallel to the boundary of the two media.

The relationship between the critical angle and the index of refraction of the two media can be found using Snell's law:

n₁ sin θ₁ = n₂ sin θ₂

where n₁ and n₂ are the indices of refraction of the first and second media, respectively, θ₁ is the angle of incidence, and θ₂ is the angle of refraction.

At the critical angle, θ₂ = 90 degrees, so we can rewrite Snell's law as:

sin θc = n₂ / n₁

where θc is the critical angle.

Rearranging the equation, we get:

n₂ = n₁ sin θc

Substituting the given values, we get:

n₂ = sin 25.1 degrees

The index of refraction of air is approximately 1.00, so we can assume that n₁ = 1.00.

Using a calculator, we find that:

n₂ = sin 25.1 degrees = 0.425

Therefore, the index of refraction of material x is approximately 0.425.

Learn more about index of refraction on:

https://brainly.com/question/25758484

#SPJ11

(a) The frequency of the wave is 5 Hz and its wavelength is 2.3 m. (b) The wavelength of the wave is 0.969 m. (c) The frequency of the wave is 11.89 Hz. (d) The maximum transverse velocity of the wave is 63.48 m/s.

1. The frequency of a wave is calculated by dividing the velocity of the wave by its wavelength. Therefore, we need to first find the wavelength of the wave using the formula:
velocity = frequency x wavelength
Rearranging this formula, we get:
wavelength = velocity / frequency
Substituting the given values, we get:
wavelength = 11.5 m/s / frequency
Now, we know that the wave has a period of 0.2 s. The period of a wave is the time taken for one complete cycle. Therefore, the frequency of the wave can be calculated using the formula:
frequency = 1 / period
Substituting the given value, we get:
frequency = 1 / 0.2 s = 5 Hz
Now, we can use the wavelength formula to find the wavelength of the wave:
wavelength = 11.5 m/s / 5 Hz = 2.3 m
Therefore, the frequency of the wave is 5 Hz and its wavelength is 2.3 m.
2. In the expression, y = 0.85 sin (6.50x - 15607), the amplitude of the wave is 0.85. The amplitude of a wave is the maximum displacement of the medium from its equilibrium position. In this case, the maximum displacement is 0.85 units.
To find the wavelength of the wave, we need to look at the coefficient of x in the expression. In this case, the coefficient is 6.50. The wavelength can be calculated using the formula:
wavelength = 2π / k
where k is the wave number and is equal to the coefficient of x. Substituting the given value, we get:
wavelength = 2π / 6.50 = 0.969 m
Therefore, the wavelength of the wave is 0.969 m.
To find the frequency of the wave, we need to look at the coefficient of x in the expression. In this case, the coefficient is also 6.50. The frequency can be calculated using the formula:
frequency = velocity / wavelength
where velocity is the speed of the wave. Substituting the given values, we get:
frequency = 11.5 m/s / 0.969 m = 11.89 Hz
Therefore, the frequency of the wave is 11.89 Hz.
To find the maximum transverse velocity of the wave, we need to look at the coefficient of sin in the expression. In this case, the coefficient is 0.85. The maximum transverse velocity can be calculated using the formula:
maximum transverse velocity = amplitude x angular frequency
where angular frequency is 2π times the frequency. Substituting the given values, we get:
angular frequency = 2π x 11.89 Hz = 74.68 rad/s
maximum transverse velocity = 0.85 x 74.68 rad/s = 63.48 m/s
Therefore, the maximum transverse velocity of the wave is 63.48 m/s.

To kbnow more about transverse velocity visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31622766

#SPJ11

The maximum number of electrons in a single orbital is two.

In quantum mechanics, electrons are described as occupying specific energy levels within an atom.

Each energy level can contain one or more orbitals, which are regions of space where electrons are likely to be found.

Each orbital has a specific energy and shape, and can hold a maximum of two electrons.

This is known as the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two electrons in an atom can have the same set of quantum numbers (which describe their energy, angular momentum, and magnetic moment).

The two electrons in an orbital must have opposite spins, which gives them a magnetic moment that cancels out.

This means that electrons in the same orbital are not identical, and can be distinguished by their spin.

Overall, the maximum number of electrons in a single orbital is two, and the total number of electrons in an energy level depends on the number and types of orbitals it contains.

For more such questions on electrons, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/860094

#SPJ11

The maximum number of electrons that a single orbital can hold is 2.

The maximum number of electrons that a single orbital can hold is 2.

An orbital is a region around the nucleus where an electron is likely to be found. There are different types of orbitals, including s, p, d, and f orbitals. Each type of orbital has a different shape and orientation in space.

The maximum number of electrons that can occupy an s orbital is 2, a p orbital is 6, a d orbital is 10, and an f orbital is 14.

https://brainly.com/question/31982704

#SPJ11

Answer:To calculate the number of photons per second entering the eye, we need to first calculate the energy of a single photon using the formula:

E = hc/λ

Where E is the energy of a photon, h is the Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and λ is the wavelength of light.

Substituting the given values, we get:

E = (6.626 × 10^-34 J s) × (3.0 × 10^8 m/s) / (500 × 10^-9 m) = 3.98 × 10^-19 J

Next, we can calculate the power of light entering the eye by multiplying the energy flux by the area of the pupil:

Power = Energy flux × Area of pupil = 1.6 × 10^-8 W/m^2 × π(6 × 10^-3 m / 2)^2 = 5.66 × 10^-10 W

Finally, the number of photons per second entering the eye can be calculated by dividing the power of light by the energy of a single photon:

Number of photons per second = Power / Energy of a single photon = 5.66 × 10^-10 W / 3.98 × 10^-19 J ≈ 1.42 × 10^9 photons/second

Therefore, approximately 1.42 × 10^9 photons per second enter the eye from the distant star.

Learn more about the properties of light and the quantization of energy.

https://brainly.com/question/14327721?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ11

After a 5.6 kg bowling ball with a velocity of 22 mph collides with a 1.6 kg bowling pin, the ball's speed reduces to 16 mph. The velocity of the bowling pin after it is hit is 33.6 mph in the opposite direction

To solve this problem, we can use the principle of conservation of momentum. According to this principle, the total momentum before the collision should be equal to the total momentum after the collision.

First, let's calculate the initial momentum of the system before the collision. The momentum of an object is calculated by multiplying its mass by its velocity. For the bowling ball, the initial momentum is 5.6 kg (mass of the ball) multiplied by 22 mph (velocity of the ball), which gives us 123.2 kg·mph.

Now, let's calculate the final momentum of the system after the collision. The final momentum of the system will be the sum of the momentum of the bowling ball and the momentum of the bowling pin. We are given that the bowling ball's speed after impact is 16 mph. So, the final momentum of the ball is 5.6 kg (mass of the ball) multiplied by 16 mph (velocity of the ball), which equals 89.6 kg·mph.

To find the velocity of the bowling pin after the collision, we need to subtract the final momentum of the ball from the total final momentum of the system. The final momentum of the bowling pin can be calculated by subtracting the final momentum of the ball from the total final momentum.

So, the momentum of the bowling pin is 89.6 kg·mph (total final momentum) minus 123.2 kg·mph (final momentum of the ball), which gives us -33.6 kg·mph. Since momentum is a vector quantity, the negative sign indicates that the direction of the bowling pin's velocity is opposite to that of the bowling ball's velocity. Therefore, the velocity of the bowling pin after it is hit is 33.6 mph in the opposite direction.

Learn more about momentum here:

https://brainly.com/question/30677308

#SPJ11

In a collision, objects with different masses experience different effects even though the force exerted on each object is the same. This results in variations in velocity, speed, and direction.

When two objects collide, the force exerted on each object is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. This is known as the principle of conservation of momentum. However, the effect of this force differs based on the masses of the objects involved.

According to Newton's second law of motion, force is equal to mass multiplied by acceleration. Since the force remains constant, a lighter object with less mass will experience a greater acceleration compared to a heavier object with more mass. As a result, the lighter object will undergo a larger change in velocity, leading to a higher change in speed and direction compared to the heavier object.

Learn more about Newton's second law of motion here:

https://brainly.com/question/32423985

#SPJ11

The work function of the metal is found to be about 3.31 x 10^-19 J.

This phenomenon is known as the photoelectric effect. The energy of a photon of light is directly proportional to its frequency (E = hf) and inversely proportional to its wavelength (E = hc/λ), where h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and λ is the wavelength.

In the case of the given wavelength of 1.50 x 10^-12m, the energy of each photon is calculated to be E = hc/λ = (6.63 x 10^-34 J s) x (3.00 x 10^8 m/s) / (1.50 x 10^-12 m) = 4.97 x 10^-19 J.

When this light is incident on a metallic surface, the photons can transfer their energy to the electrons in the metal, causing them to be ejected from the surface.

The maximum kinetic energy of the ejected electrons can be calculated using the equation Kmax = hf - φ, where φ is the work function of the metal (the minimum amount of energy required to remove an electron from the surface).

If we assume that all the energy of each photon is transferred to a single electron, then the maximum kinetic energy of the ejected electrons would be Kmax = hf - φ = (4.97 x 10^-19 J) - φ.

From the given information, we know that the electrons are ejected with speeds ranging up to 2.50 x 10^8 m/s. Using the equation for kinetic energy, we can find the mass of the ejected electron, which turns out to be about 9.11 x 10^-31 kg (the mass of an electron).

Then, using the equation for kinetic energy again, we can solve for the work function of the metal, which is found to be about φ = 3.31 x 10^-19 J.

In summary, when light with a wavelength of 1.50 x 10^-12m is incident on a metallic surface, the photons can transfer their energy to the electrons in the metal, causing them to be ejected with speeds ranging up to 2.50 x 10^8 m/s.

The maximum kinetic energy of the ejected electrons depends on the frequency of the light and the work function of the metal. In this case, the work function of the metal is found to be about 3.31 x 10^-19 J.

To learn more about electrons, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/12001116

#SPJ11

To find the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) of two strings of length n using linear space, we can use a dynamic programming approach called the Hirschberg's algorithm.

This algorithm uses divide and conquer strategy to reduce the space complexity from O([tex]n^2[/tex]) to O(n).

The Hirschberg's algorithm works by dividing the two strings into smaller subproblems and finding their LCS recursively. To do this, we first find the middle column of the dynamic programming table for the two strings. This middle column represents the characters that are common to both strings.

Then, we recursively find the LCS of the two substrings of the strings on the left side of the middle column and the two substrings of the strings on the right side of the middle column. This recursive process continues until we reach the base case of either one or both strings being empty.

Finally, we combine the LCS of the left substrings and the right substrings to find the LCS of the entire strings. This can be done by using a simple merging algorithm that compares the lengths of the LCS of the two substrings and selects the longer one.

The Hirschberg's algorithm has a time complexity of O([tex]n^2[/tex]) and a space complexity of O(n). This makes it an efficient algorithm for finding the LCS of two strings with large n values while still keeping the space usage within a linear limit.

To learn more about  Longest Common Subsequence refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29809157

#SPJ11

85.2  coulombs of charge travel through the electrical starter during these 0.71 seconds.

The amount of charge that travels through the electrical starter can be calculated using the formula:

Q = I × t

where Q is the charge in coulombs (C), I is the current in amperes (A), and t is the time in seconds (s).

The current drawn by the electrical starter will depend on the resistance of the starter and the voltage of the battery. Let's assume that the starter has a resistance of 0.1 ohms and the battery provides a constant voltage of 12 volts. Using Ohm's law, we can calculate the current:

I = V / R = 12 V / 0.1 Ω = 120 A

Now we can calculate the charge that passes through the starter during the 0.71 seconds after the key is turned on:

Q = I × t = 120 A × 0.71 s ≈ 85.2 C

Approximately 85.2 coulombs of charge will pass through the electrical starter during the 0.71 seconds after the key is turned on.

To know more about electrical starter:

https://brainly.com/question/16680010

#SPJ11

the angular velocity of the rod after the impulse is 0.25 rad/s and the speed of the mass center is 0.31 m/s.

Assuming that the slender rod is uniform, we can use conservation of angular momentum to find the final angular velocity of the rod. The initial angular momentum is zero, since the rod is at rest, So we have:

Iωf × L = Iωi × L + I

where I is the moment of inertia of the rod about its center of mass, L is the length of the rod, and ωi and ωf are the initial and final angular velocities, respectively. Solving for ωf, we get:

ωf = (Iωi + I)/(IL) = (2ωi + 1/2)/(2)

Plugging in the given values, we get:

ωf = (2(0) + 1/2)/(2) = 0.25 rad/s

So we have:

(1/2)mv^2 = (1/2)Iωf^2 + (1/2)mvcm^2

where m is the mass of the rod and vcm is the speed of the center of mass. The moment of inertia about the center of mass for a slender rod is (1/12)ml^2, so we have:

(1/2)(4 kg)v^2 = (1/2)(1/12)(4 kg)(0.75 m)^2(0.25 rad/s)^2 + (1/2)(4 kg)vcm^2

Solving for vcm, we get:

vcm = sqrt[(4/3)(0.75 m)^2(0.25 rad/s)^2 + (1/2)v^2] = 0.31 m/s

Therefore, the angular velocity of the rod after the impulse is 0.25 rad/s and the speed of the mass center is 0.31 m/s.

learn more about inertia and mass center here :

brainly.com/question/30530015

#SPJ4

The maximum kinetic energy of electrons ejected from calcium by 420-nm violet light is approximately 2.63 eV.

To calculate the maximum kinetic energy of electrons ejected by light, we can use the equation:

Kinetic energy = Photon energy - Binding energy.

First, let's find the photon energy of 420-nm violet light. The energy of a photon is given by the equation:

E = hc/λ, where E is the energy, h is Planck's constant (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s), c is the speed of light (3.0 × 10⁸ m/s), and λ is the wavelength.

Converting the wavelength to meters, we have:

λ = 420 nm = 420 × 10⁻⁹ m.

Calculating the photon energy:

E = (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s * 3.0 × 10⁸ m/s) / (420 × 10⁻⁹ m) ≈ 4.712 eV.

Next, we subtract the binding energy of calcium:

Max kinetic energy = Photon energy - Binding energy = 4.712 eV - 2.71 eV ≈ 2.63 eV.

Therefore, the maximum kinetic energy is approximately 2.63 eV.

To know more about kinetic energy, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30764377#

#SPJ11

The kinetic energy available in the decay is 0.78235 MeV.

The kinetic energy available in the beta decay of a free neutron into a proton with the emission of an electron can be calculated using the mass-energy equivalence formula, E = mc², where E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light. The mass difference between the neutron and the proton plus the electron is equivalent to the kinetic energy released in the decay.

The mass of a neutron is 1.008665 atomic mass units (u) or 1.67493 × 10⁻²⁷ kg.

The mass of a proton is 1.007276 u or 1.67262 × 10⁻²⁷ kg.  

The mass of an electron is 5.486 × 10⁻⁴ u or 9.10939 × 10⁻³¹ kg.

The mass difference between a neutron and a proton plus an electron is 0.78235 MeV/c² or 1.252 × 10⁻¹³ J.

Thus, the kinetic energy available in the decay is 0.78235 MeV.

To know more about kinetic energy refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/26590527#

#SPJ11

The correct option that describes how the sugar lowered the melting point is (a) The mixing of the sugar lowered the chemical potential of the liquid water.

When sugar is dissolved in water, it breaks into individual molecules or ions and gets distributed throughout the solvent. The solute-solvent interaction lowers the chemical potential of the solvent, which results in a decrease in the melting point of the water. This is known as the freezing point depression. The lowered chemical potential of the water molecules makes it more difficult for them to form the organized lattice structure required for freezing, and hence, the melting point of the water decreases.

In option (b), the presence of sugar does not raise the chemical potential of the solid ice, but instead, it reduces the chemical potential of the liquid water. In option (c), the presence of sugar does not keep the system from reaching equilibrium but rather affects the equilibrium point by lowering the melting point of the water.

In conclusion, the correct option that describes how sugar lowers the melting point of water is (a) The mixing of the sugar lowered the chemical potential of the liquid water.

Learn more about melting point here:

https://brainly.com/question/29578567

#SPJ11

The linear density of the string is 0.230 kg/m, The linear density of a string is defined as its mass per unit length. We can find it by dividing the mass of the string by its length :- Linear density = Mass / Length.

Linear density is a physical quantity that describes the mass per unit length of a one-dimensional object such as a string, wire or rope. The linear density of a string can be calculated by dividing its mass by its length

Linear density = 1.01 kg / 4.4 m

Linear density = 0.230 kg/m

Linear density is an important parameter in understanding the behavior of strings and wires, as it affects their mechanical properties such as tension and elasticity.

To know more about linear density refer here :-

https://brainly.com/question/14835523#

#SPJ11

Time dilation is a concept in physics that describes how time appears to slow down for an object that is moving relative to an observer.

Apply this concept to the muon. The muon is a subatomic particle that is created in the upper atmosphere when cosmic rays collide with air molecules. Muons are unstable and decay quickly, with a half-life of only 2.2 microseconds. However, because they travel at near the speed of light, they experience time dilation and appear to live longer than they actually do. If we take into account the effects of time dilation, we can calculate how far the muon would travel before decaying. According to the theory of relativity, the amount of time dilation that an object experiences is given by the Lorentz factor, which is equal to:
gamma = 1 / sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)


Using this value for the velocity of the muon, we can calculate how far it travels before decaying. Plugging in the values for time and velocity, we get: d = (0.999999995 c) * (gamma * 2.2 microseconds)
d = 660 meters
The effects of time dilation, the muon would travel approximately 660 meters before decaying. This is significantly farther than it would travel if we did not take into account time dilation, due to the fact that time appears to slow down for the muon as it moves at near the speed of light. The distance a muon travels can be calculated using the following formula: Distance = Speed × Dilated Time
The dilated time can be found using the time dilation formula in special relativity: Dilated Time = Time ÷ √(1 - (v^2 / c^2))
where Time is the proper time (muon's lifetime), v is the muon's speed, and c is the speed of light.
After finding the dilated time, multiply it by the muon's speed to get the distance traveled.

To know more about time dilation visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30493090

#SPJ11

Maxwell's equations are a set of four fundamental equations that describe the behavior of electromagnetic waves.

These equations led to a number of testable predictions, including:
1. The existence of electromagnetic waves: Maxwell's equations predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves, which were later confirmed by Hertz's experiments.
2. The speed of light: Maxwell's equations showed that the speed of light was a constant, independent of the motion of the observer or the source. This prediction was later confirmed by Michelson and Morley's famous experiment.
3. Polarization of light: Maxwell's equations predicted that light waves could be polarized, meaning that their electric field oscillations could be confined to a particular plane. This prediction was later confirmed by experiments with polarizers.
4. Dispersion: Maxwell's equations predicted that different colors of light would travel at slightly different speeds through a material, leading to a phenomenon known as dispersion. This prediction was later confirmed by experiments with prisms and other optical instruments.
Overall, Maxwell's equations led to a number of important predictions about the behavior of electromagnetic waves, many of which have been confirmed by experimental evidence.

To know more about electromagnetic waves visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3101711

#SPJ11

In Part A, the working distance of a microscope lens was calculated to be 18.95 mm, and in Part B, the focal length of an eyepiece lens was calculated to be -0.22 cm.

Part A:

The lateral magnification of an object produced by a lens is given by the formula:

m = -(di/do)

where

We are given m = -39.5 and fobjective = 3.75 mm. We can use the formula for the focal length of a thin lens to relate the image and object distances to the focal length:

1/f = 1/di + 1/do

For the medium-power objective lens, we can assume that the image distance is equal to the focal length, since the image is formed at the focal plane of the lens. So we have:

1/3.75 = 1/(-di) + 1/do

Simplifying, we get:

Substituting this into the equation above, we get:

1/3.75 = 1/(-di) - 1/(39.5 di)

Solving for di, we get:

di = -14.2 mm

Finally, we can find the working distance d by subtracting the object distance from the focal length:

d = do - fobjective = -14.2 - 3.75 = -18.95 mm

Since distance can't be negative, we can conclude that the working distance is 18.95 mm.

Therefore, the answer is:

Part A: d = 18.95 mm

Part B:

The overall magnification of a compound microscope is given by the product of the magnification of the objective lens and the eyepiece lens:

M = -mo × me

where

We are given M = -115 and N = 25 cm. We can use the formula for the near-point distance to find the image distance produced by the eyepiece lens:

1/fep = 1/N - 1/di

where

Assuming that the image produced by the eyepiece lens is at infinity, we can simplify this equation to:

1/fep = 1/N

Solving for fep, we get:

fep = N/M = (25 cm)/(-115) = -0.217 cm

Note that we use the negative sign because the magnification is negative, which means the image is inverted.

Therefore, the answer is:

Part B: f = -0.22 cm

Learn more about distance : brainly.com/question/26046491

#SPJ11

If the burner is on for 125 seconds with a power rating of 1000 watts, then 125000 joules of energy are used.

We need to know the power rating of the burner to calculate the energy used. Let's assume the power rating of the burner is 1000 watts.

Power = 1000 watts

Time = 125 seconds

Energy = Power x Time

Energy = 1000 watts x 125 seconds

Energy = 125000 joules.

Energy is a fundamental concept in physics and is typically measured in joules (J). The joule (J) is the SI unit of energy and is defined as the amount of energy transferred or work done when a force of one newton acts on an object to move it one meter in the direction of the force.

learn more about energy here:

https://brainly.com/question/27869721

#SPJ11

(a)The pressure of the gas is 4.9 × 10^5 Pa. (b) The average kinetic energy of an oxygen molecule is 3.7 × 10^-20 J. (c) If the volume of the gas is doubled while the temperature and number of moles are held constant, the pressure will be reduced by a factor of 2.

a) To find the pressure of the gas, we can use the ideal gas law, which states that:

PV = nRT

where P is the pressure, V is the volume, n is the number of moles, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the temperature in Kelvin.

First, we need to convert the temperature from Celsius to Kelvin:

T = 295 °C + 273.15 = 568.15 K

Then, we can plug in the values:

P(0.0035 m^3) = (3 mol)(8.31 J/mol·K)(568.15 K)

Solving for P, we get:

P = (3 mol)(8.31 J/mol·K)(568.15 K)/(0.0035 m^3) = 4.9 × 10^5 Pa

Therefore, the pressure of the gas is 4.9 × 10^5 Pa.

(b) The average kinetic energy of a gas molecule is given by the equation:

KE = (3/2)kT

where k is the Boltzmann constant. Substituting the values, we get:

KE = (3/2)(1.38 × 10^-23 J/K)(568.15 K) = 3.7 × 10^-20 J

Therefore, the average kinetic energy of an oxygen molecule is 3.7 × 10^-20 J.

(c) If the volume of the gas is doubled while the temperature and number of moles are held constant, the pressure will be reduced by a factor of 2, and the average kinetic energy of the molecules will remain the same. This can be seen by rearranging the ideal gas law:

P = nRT/V Since n, R, and T are held constant, and V is doubled, P is divided by 2. The average kinetic energy of the molecules depends only on the temperature, which is also held constant, so it does not change. Therefore, the pressure is halved, but the kinetic energy remains the same.

For such more questions on pressure

https://brainly.com/question/29525868

#SPJ11