a woman is 5 times as old as her daughter in 15 years time to be two times as old as her daughter to find a mother's presentsage​

The required answer is  the mean sales for all stores last month were indeed more than 20.

Based on the given information, you want to set up null and alternative hypotheses to test if there's convincing evidence that the mean sales of can openers for all stores last month was more than 20. Here's how you can set up the hypotheses:
The null hypothesis would be that the mean can opener sales for all stores last month is equal to 20.
Null hypothesis (H0): The mean sales of can openers for all stores last month was equal to 20.
H0: μ = 20
while the alternative hypothesis would be that the mean can opener sales for all stores last month.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): The mean sales of can openers for all stores last month was more than 20.
H1: μ > 20
where μ is the population mean can opener sales for all stores last month.
To test these hypotheses, you'll need to perform a hypothesis test (e.g., a one-sample t-test) using the given sample data of can opener sales from 50 stores. If the test result provides enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, you can conclude that the mean sales for all stores last month were indeed more than 20.

To know more about random sample. Click on the link.

https://brainly.com/question/31523301

#SPJ11

If x is a non-zero rational number and y is an irrational number, then y/x is irrational: TRUE

Assume that y/x is rational.

This means that we can write y/x as a fraction in the form a/b, where a and b are integers and b is non-zero.
y/x = a/b

Multiplying both sides by x, we get:
y = ax/b

Since x is a rational number, it can be expressed as a fraction in the form c/d, where c and d are integers and d is non-zero.
x = c/d

Substituting x with c/d in the above equation, we get:
y = ac/bd

Now, we have expressed y as a fraction, which contradicts the given fact that y is an irrational number. Hence, our assumption that y/x is rational must be false.
Therefore, y/x is irrational.

Know more about irrationality here:

https://brainly.com/question/20400557

#SPJ11

If f is continuous and 4. 2∫ f(x) dx = 9, evaluate ∫ f (2x) dx will be 9/4.

Using the substitution u = 2x, we have:

∫ f(2x) dx = 1/2 ∫ f(u) du

Now, let's use the given information:

2∫ f(x) dx = 9

∫ f(x) dx = 9/2

Substituting this in our expression, we get:

∫ f(2x) dx = 1/2 ∫ f(u) du = 1/2 ∫ f(x) dx [using u = 2x]

= 1/2 × (9/2)

= 9/4

Therefore, the value of ∫ f(2x) dx is 9/4.

For more such answers on calculus

https://brainly.com/question/29499469

#SPJ11

To evaluate ∫ f(2x) dx, we can use the substitution u=2x, which means du/dx=2, or dx=du/2. Substituting this into the integral, we get: ∫ f(2x) dx = ∫ f(u) (du/2)

We can then rewrite the original equation as:

∫ f(x) dx = (9/2)

Substituting this into the integral we want to evaluate, we get:

2∫ f(x) dx = 2(9/2) = 9

Substituting this into our expression for ∫ f(2x) dx, we get:

∫ f(2x) dx = (1/2)∫ f(x) dx = (1/2)(9/2) = 9/4

Therefore, we have evaluated the integral ∫ f(2x) dx to be 9/4, using the given information that f is continuous and 2∫ f(x) dx = 9. To evaluate the integral ∫₀^2 f(2x) dx, first perform a substitution. Let u = 2x, so du = 2 dx. When x = 0, u = 0; when x = 2, u = 4. Now the integral becomes:

(1/2)∫₀^4 f(u) du.

We're multiplying by 1/2 because du = 2 dx, so dx = (1/2) du.

Since f is continuous and ∫₀^4 f(x) dx = 9, we can now evaluate the new integral:

(1/2) * 9 = 4.5.

So, ∫₀^2 f(2x) dx = 4.5.

To learn more about Dx: brainly.com/question/30426439

#SPJ11

The period of the oscillatory motion is determined as 10 seconds.

The time taken for an oscillating particle to complete one cycle of oscillation is known as the Period of the oscillating particle.

The period of an oscillatory motion is denoted by T. The S.I. unit of time period is second.

The period of an oscillatory motion is equal to the reciprocal of the frequency of the oscillation.

Mathematically, the formula or relationship is given as;

f = n/t

T = 1/f

T = t/n

where;

Looking at the graph, we can see that one complete cycle of the motion is between 3.5 and 13.5

Period of the motion = ( 13.5 - 3.5 ) / 1

Period of the motion = 10 s

Learn more about period of oscillation here: https://brainly.com/question/20070798

#SPJ1

Stock B will cost $325.00 more than Stock A at the end of 4 years.

Given that Stock A doubles in price by the end of every year, while Stock B triples in price by the end of every year.

If they both start off at $5.00, we need to determine how much more will Stock B cost than Stock A at the end of 4 years. We need to determine how much more Stock B will cost than Stock A at the end of 4 years if they both start off at $5.00.

Solution: We can represent the price of Stock A and Stock B at the end of the 4th year as:

Price of Stock A = $5.00 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 = $80.00

Price of Stock B = $5.00 × 3 × 3 × 3 × 3 = $405.00

The difference in the price of Stock B and Stock A at the end of the 4th year is:

Price of Stock B - Price of Stock A = $405.00 - $80.00 = $325.00

Stock B will cost $325.00 more than Stock A at the end of 4 years.

To know more about equation, Visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29172205

#SPJ11

To evaluate the line integral, we need to parameterize the curve, calculate ds, and then substitute the parameterization into the integral expression.

To evaluate the line integral ∫c xyz² ds, where c is the line segment from (-3, 5, 0) to (-1, 6, 4), we need to parameterize the curve and calculate the line integral using the parameterization.

Let's parameterize the curve c(t) from t = 0 to t = 1:

x(t) = -3 + 2t

y(t) = 5 + t

z(t) = 4t

Now, we need to calculate the derivative of each component with respect to t to find ds:

dx/dt = 2

dy/dt = 1

dz/dt = 4

ds = √((dx/dt)² + (dy/dt)² + (dz/dt)²) dt

= √(4 + 1 + 16) dt

= √(21) dt

Now, we can substitute the parameterization and ds into the line integral:

∫c xyz² ds = ∫[0,1] (x(t) * y(t) * z(t)²) * √(21) dt

= ∫[0,1] (-3 + 2t)(5 + t)(4t)² * √(21) dt

Now we can proceed to evaluate the line integral by plugging in the parameterization and limits of integration into the expression and calculating the integral.

Learn more about Integral

brainly.com/question/29128792

#SPJ11

The given relation is P = 162x – 81x2, where P represents the profit in thousands of dollars, and x represents the number of snowboards in thousands.

Given that the company has to break even, it means the profit should be zero. Therefore, we need to solve the equation P = 0.0 = 162x – 81x² to find the number of snowboards that must be produced for the company to break even.To solve the above quadratic equation, we first need to factorize it.0 = 162x – 81x²= 81x(2 - x)0 = 81x ⇒ x = 0 or 2As the number of snowboards can't be zero, it means that the company has to produce 2 thousand snowboards to break even. Hence, the required number of snowboards that must be produced for the company to break even is 2000.

To know more about break even,visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31774927

#SPJ11

1. The term used to describe an association or interdependence between two sets of data or variables is "Correlation Analysis."

Correlation Analysis is a statistical method used to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables.

2. The graphic tool used to illustrate the relationship between two variables is called a "Scatter Diagram."

Explanation: A Scatter Diagram is a graphical representation of data points that shows the relationship between two variables, often using dots or other symbols to represent each observation.

3. The term represented by the symbol 'r' in correlation and regression analysis is "Pearson Correlation Coefficient."

The Pearson Correlation Coefficient measures the linear relationship between two variables, with values ranging from -1 to 1.

4. True statement: Correlation does not imply causation.

Understanding correlation analysis, scatter diagrams, and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient is crucial for interpreting relationships between variables in various fields, such as business, social sciences, and natural sciences.

To know more about Correlation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31588111

#SPJ11

The statement "A disadvantage of electronic questionnaires is that this way of surveying is relatively expensive." is: B. False.

In Science, a sample survey simply refers to a type of observational study that uses various data collection methods such as questionnaires and interviews, which favors it in revealing correlations between two data variables.

In Science, a question can be defined as a group of words or sentence that are developed, so as to elicit an information in the form of answer from an individual such as a student.

In conclusion, an advantage of of electronic questionnaires is that it is a form of sample survey that is relatively less expensive in comparison with other forms of survey.

Read more on questionnaires here: https://brainly.com/question/27972710

#SPJ1

The series ∑(n=1 to ∞) sin([tex]n^6[/tex]/n) is absolutely convergent and the series ∑(n=1 to ∞) [tex](-1)^{n}/n^2[/tex] is conditionally convergent.

For the series ∑(n=1 to ∞) sin([tex]n^6[/tex]/n), we can determine its convergence properties using various tests.

First, let's consider the series ∑(n=1 to ∞) sin([tex]n^6[/tex]/n). Since sin(x) is a bounded function, we can apply the Comparison Test to determine whether the series converges absolutely, conditionally, or diverges.

Comparison Test states that if 0 ≤ |aₙ| ≤ bₙ for all n, and ∑(n=1 to ∞) bₙ converges, then ∑(n=1 to ∞) aₙ converges absolutely.

In this case, we have |sin([tex]n^6[/tex]/n)| ≤ 1 for all n. Therefore, we can compare the series to the series ∑(n=1 to ∞) 1, which is a geometric series with a common ratio of 1 and converges.

Since the series ∑(n=1 to ∞) 1 converges, and |sin([tex]n^6[/tex]/n)| ≤ 1 for all n, we can conclude that the given series ∑(n=1 to ∞) sin([tex]n^6[/tex]/n) converges absolutely.

Therefore, the series ∑(n=1 to ∞) sin([tex]n^6[/tex]/n) is absolutely convergent.

As for the series ∑(n=1 to ∞)[tex](-1)^{n}/n^2[/tex], we can determine its convergence properties using the Alternating Series Test.

Alternating Series Test states that if the terms of a series alternate in sign, decrease in absolute value, and tend to zero, then the series converges.

In this case, the terms of the series alternate in sign [tex](-1)^n[/tex], decrease in absolute value (1/[tex]n^2[/tex]), and tend to zero as n approaches infinity.

Therefore, the series ∑(n=1 to ∞) [tex](-1)^{n}/n^2[/tex] converges conditionally.

Learn more about Alternating Series Test here:

https://brainly.com/question/30400869

#SPJ11

The expression of [tex]\frac{20z^{10} }{(5z^{-2}) ^{3} } \\\\\\[/tex] in  fraction in simplest form can be written as  [tex]\frac{4}{25} \ *z^{16}[/tex]

An element of a whole can be described as fraction however the number  can be expressed mathematically as a quotient, and the numerator and denominator  is been divided into two where Both are integers in a simple fraction , it should be noted that the proper fraction  will be less than the denominator.

Given that

[tex]\frac{20z^{10} }{(5z^{-2}) ^{3} } \\\\\\[/tex]

This can be simplified as

[tex]\frac{20z^{10} }{(5z^{-2}) ^{3} } \\\\\\\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\frac{20z^{10} }{(125*z^{-2}) ^{3}}[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{20z^{10}}{125 * z^{-6} }[/tex]

We can divide both up and the denominator by 5

= [tex]\frac{4z^{10}}{25 * z^{-6} }[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{4}{25} \ *z^{16}.[/tex]

Learn more about exponents at:

https://brainly.com/question/13669161

#SPJ1

By applying the Laplace transform to the given boundary-value problem and following the procedure outlined in Example 10, the solution for y(t) is obtained as y(t) = 6e^(-t).

The Laplace transform can be used to solve differential equations, including boundary-value problems. In this case, we have the second-order linear homogeneous differential equation y'' + 2y' + y = 0, with the initial conditions y'(0) = 6 and y(1) = 6.

To solve the problem using the Laplace transform, we apply the transform to the differential equation and the initial conditions. This transforms the differential equation into an algebraic equation that can be solved for the Laplace transform of y(t), denoted as Y(s).

By applying the Laplace transform to the given differential equation, we obtain the algebraic equation s^2Y(s) + 2sY(s) + Y(s) = 0. Solving this equation for Y(s), we find Y(s) = 6s/(s^2 + 2s + 1).

To find the inverse Laplace transform of Y(s) and obtain the solution y(t), we use partial fraction decomposition and consult Laplace transform tables. By applying the inverse Laplace transform, we find y(t) = 6e^(-t).

Therefore, the solution for the given boundary-value problem is y(t) = 6e^(-t)

Learn more about  Laplace transform here:

https://brainly.com/question/30759963

#SPJ11

Log (6) lies between 0 and 1 exclusive and it is a positive number since it is a logarithm of a number greater than 1.

The justification why log (6) must have a value less than 1 but greater than 0 is as follows:Justification:

The logarithmic function is a one-to-one and onto function, whose domain is all positive real numbers and the range is all real numbers, and for any positive real number b and a, if we have b > 1, then log b a > 0, and if we have 0 < b < 1, then log b a < 0.

For log (6), we can use a change of base formula to find that:log (6) = log(6) / log(10) = 0.7781, which is less than 1 but greater than 0, since 0 < log(6) / log(10) < 1, thus, log (6) must have a value less than 1 but greater than 0.

Therefore, log (6) lies between 0 and 1 exclusive and it is a positive number since it is a logarithm of a number greater than 1.

Thus, the justification of why log (6) must have a value less than 1 but greater than 0 is proven.

Know more about logarithm  here,

https://brainly.com/question/30226560

#SPJ11

(a) Using the property that (a^b)^c = a^(bc), we can simplify e^(-7/6) as e^((-7/6)(1/7)). Simplifying further, we have e^(-1/6) as the simplified expression.

(b) Using the property that a^b * a^c = a^(b+c), we can simplify e^4 * e^(-1/2) as e^(4 + (-1/2)). Simplifying further, we have e^(7/2) as the simplified expression.

(c) Using the property that a^(-b) = 1/(a^b), we can simplify e^(-4) * e^(-5) as (1/e^4) * (1/e^5). Using the property that a^b * a^c = a^(b+c), we can simplify further as 1/(e^(4+5)) = 1/e^9.

(d) Using the property that a^(-b) = 1/(a^b), we can simplify e^(-8) * e^(-3/2) as (1/e^8) * (1/e^(3/2)). Using the property that a^b * a^c = a^(b+c), we can simplify further as 1/(e^(8 + 3/2)) = 1/e^(19/2).

Learn more about expression here: brainly.com/question/32386608

#SPJ11

The probability is D. 0.7807. Therefore, the answer is D. 0.7807.

To calculate the power of the test, we need to determine the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when the alternative hypothesis is true. In other words, we want to find P(reject H0 | Ha is true).

First, we need to calculate the critical value that corresponds to the level of significance of the test. Since the alternative hypothesis is one-tailed (Ha:μ>100), and the level of significance is not given, we'll assume a significance level of 0.05 (commonly used in hypothesis testing).

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that the critical value for a one-tailed test at a 0.05 level of significance is 1.645.

Next, we need to calculate the standard error of the mean (SEM), which is equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size.

SEM = 8 / √60 = 1.0328

To find the test statistic (z-score) for the alternative hypothesis, we use the following formula:

z = (x¯ - μ) / SEM

z = (101.7 - 102.5) / 1.0328 = -0.775

The area to the right of this z-score under the standard normal distribution represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when the alternative hypothesis is true.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find this probability to be:

P(z > -0.775) = 0.7807

for such more question on probability

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The probability is D. 0.7807. Therefore, the answer is D. 0.7807.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that the critical value for a one-tailed test at a 0.05 level of significance is 1.645.

Next, we need to calculate the standard error of the mean (SEM), which is equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size.

= 8 / √60 = 1.0328

To find the test statistic (z-score) for the alternative hypothesis, we use the following formula:

z = (x - μ) / SEM

z = (101.7 - 102.5) / 1.0328 = -0.775

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find this probability to be:

P(z > -0.775) = 0.7807

Learn more question on probability

brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ4

Okay, let's solve this step-by-step:

1) Take the integral: f(x) = ∫e6x−17x dx

= e6x / 6 - 17x / 17

= 1 - x + 3x2 - 17x3 / 6 + ...

2) This is a power series centered at x = 0. To convert to a full power series, we set c = 1 and the powers start at n = 0:

f(x) = 1 ∑n=0[infinity] an xn

3) Identify the first 5 nonzero terms:

f(x) = 1 - x + 3x2 - 17x3 / 6 + 51x4 / 24 - 153x5 / 120

Therefore, the first 5 nonzero terms of the power series are:

1 - x + 3x2 - 17x3 / 6 + 51x4 / 24

Let me know if you would like more details on any part of the solution.

The full power series and the first five nonzero terms of this power series are f(x) = C + x + 3x² + 6x³ + 9x⁴

To find the power series representation of the indefinite integral of the function f(x) = ∫(e⁶ˣ - 17x) dx, begin by integrating the given function term by term. Calculate the power series centered at x = 0.

Start with the series representation of e⁶ˣ and -17x:

e⁶ˣ = 1 + 6x + (6x)²/₂! + (6x)³/₃! + (6x)⁴/₄! + ...

-17x = -17x + 0 + 0 + 0 + ...

Integrating term by term, the power series representation of the indefinite integral is obtained:

∫(e⁶ˣ - 17x) dx = C + ∫(1 + 6x + (6x)²/₂! + (6x)³/₃! + (6x)⁴/₄! + ...) dx

= C + x + 3x² + (6x)³/₃! + (6x)⁴/₄! + ...

Simplify this series by expanding the terms and collecting like powers of x:

∫(e⁶ˣ - 17x) dx = C + x + 3x² + 36x^3/6 + 216x⁴/₂₄ + ...

= C + x + 3x² + 6x³ + 9x⁴ + ...

The power series representation of the indefinite integral is given by:

f(x) = C + x + 3x² + 6x³ + 9x⁴ + ...

The first five nonzero terms of this power series are:

f(x) = C + x + 3x² + 6x³ + 9x⁴

learn more about power series: https://brainly.com/question/28158010

#SPJ4

We cannot make an estimate of the number of students who dislike cleaning their rooms as their least favorite chore.

The question provides no data regarding the number of students who dislike cleaning their rooms as their least favorite chore. Therefore, we cannot make a logical estimate. The number of students who dislike cleaning their rooms may be as few as zero, or it may be more than half of the total number of students.

The conclusion is that we cannot make an estimate of the number of students who dislike cleaning their rooms as their least favorite chore.

To know more about numbers visit:

brainly.com/question/24908711

#SPJ11

p(A) is equal to the expression we obtained for the characteristic equation. Therefore, p(A) = 0, which verifies the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem for 2x2 matrices.

To prove that the characteristic equation of a 2x2 matrix A can be expressed as p(λ) = λ² - tr(A)λ + det(A) = 0, we'll go through the steps:

Let A be a 2x2 matrix:

A = [a  b]

   [c  d]

The characteristic equation of A is given by:

det(A - λI) = 0,

where I is the identity matrix and λ is the eigenvalue.

Substituting A - λI, we get:

det([a - λ  b]

     [c  d - λ]) = 0.

Expanding the determinant, we have:

(a - λ)(d - λ) - bc = 0.

Simplifying, we get:

ad - aλ - dλ + λ² - bc = 0.

Rearranging the terms, we have:

λ² - (a + d)λ + ad - bc = 0.

We can see that (a + d) is the trace of matrix A, which is tr(A), and ad - bc is the determinant of matrix A, which is det(A). Therefore, the characteristic equation of matrix A can be expressed as:

p(λ) = λ² - tr(A)λ + det(A) = 0.

Now, using the expression p(λ) = λ² - tr(A)λ + det(A) = 0, we can prove the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem for 2x2 matrices.

The Cayley-Hamilton Theorem states that every square matrix satisfies its own characteristic equation. In other words, if p(λ) is the characteristic equation of a matrix A, then p(A) = 0.

Let's consider a 2x2 matrix A:

A = [a  b]

   [c  d]

The characteristic equation of A is given by:

p(λ) = λ² - tr(A)λ + det(A) = 0.

We want to show that p(A) = 0.

Substituting A into the characteristic equation, we get:

p(A) = A² - tr(A)A + det(A)I.

Expanding A², we have:

p(A) = AA - tr(A)A + det(A)I.

Using matrix multiplication, we get:

p(A) = AA - tr(A)A + det(A)I

     = AA - (a + d)A + ad - bc × I

     = A² - aA - dA + (a + d)A - ad - bc × I

     = A² - (a + d)A + ad - bc × I

     = A² - tr(A)A + det(A)I.

We can see that p(A) is equal to the expression we obtained for the characteristic equation. Therefore, p(A) = 0, which verifies the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem for 2x2 matrices.

Learn more about Matrix.

brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11

Answer:

0.31 g

Explanation:

To find out how much pepper Haley has left, we need to subtract the amount she used from the amount she started with:

0.7 g - 0.39 g = 0.31 g

Therefore, Haley has 0.31 grams of pepper left.

The equation that best supports the given scenario is 18x - 36 = 234, where 'x' represents the cost per banner.

Let's break down the information provided in the problem. Debra printed 18 banners and received a discount of $36 off her entire purchase. If we let 'x' represent the cost per banner, then the total cost of the banners before the discount would be 18x dollars.

Since she received a discount of $36, her total cost after the discount is 18x - 36 dollars.

According to the problem, Debra paid a total of $234 after the discount. Therefore, we can set up the equation as follows: 18x - 36 = 234. By solving this equation, we can determine the value of 'x,' which represents the cost per banner.

To solve the equation, we can begin by isolating the term with 'x.' Adding 36 to both sides of the equation gives us 18x = 270. Then, dividing both sides by 18 yields x = 15.

Therefore, the cost per banner is $15.

To learn more about total cost visit:

brainly.com/question/30355738

#SPJ11

The conformal map from the horizontal strip {-a < Im(z) < a} onto the right half-plane {Re(w) > 0} is given by h(z) = [tex]e^(πiz / a)[/tex].

What is exponential function?

The exponential function is a function of the form f(x) = [tex]e^x[/tex], where e is Euler's number (approximately equal to 2.71828) and x is the input variable. The exponential function is commonly used in various areas of mathematics, physics, and engineering due to its fundamental properties.

The exponential function can be used to locate a conformal projection onto the right half-plane Re(w) > 0 from the horizontal strip -a Im(z) a. onto the right half-plane {Re(w) > 0}, we can use the exponential function. The key is to map the strip onto the upper half-plane first, and then apply another transformation to map the upper half-plane onto the right half-plane.

Step 1: Map the strip onto the upper half-plane

Consider the function f(z) = [tex]e^(πiz / (2a)[/tex]). This function maps the strip {-a < Im(z) < a} onto the upper half-plane.

Step 2: Map the upper half-plane onto the right half-plane

To map the upper half-plane onto the right half-plane, we can use the transformation g(w) = w², which squares the complex number w.

Combining these two steps, we have the conformal map from the horizontal strip onto the right half-plane:

h(z) = g(f(z)) = [tex](e^(πiz / (2a))[/tex])² = [tex]e^(πiz / a)[/tex].

Therefore, the conformal map from the horizontal strip {-a < Im(z) < a} onto the right half-plane {Re(w) > 0} is given by h(z) = [tex]e^(πiz / a)[/tex].

To learn more about exponential function follow the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/30241796

#SPJ4

To put the fractions 2/3, 3/5, and 7/10 in order from smallest to largest, we need to compare them using a common denominator. The common denominator for 3, 5, and 10 is 30. So, we need to convert each fraction to an equivalent fraction with a denominator of 30.

For the first fraction, 2/3, we can multiply the numerator and denominator by 10 to get an equivalent fraction with a denominator of 30:

2/3 = (2/3) x (10/10) = 20/30

For the second fraction, 3/5, we can multiply the numerator and denominator by 6 to get an equivalent fraction with a denominator of 30:

3/5 = (3/5) x (6/6) = 18/30

For the third fraction, 7/10, we can multiply the numerator and denominator by 3 to get an equivalent fraction with a denominator of 30:

7/10 = (7/10) x (3/3) = 21/30

Now we can put the fractions in order from smallest to largest:

18/30 < 20/30 < 21/30

So the order from smallest to largest is:

3/5 < 2/3 < 7/10

Know more about fractions here:

https://brainly.com/question/20393250

#SPJ11

The relation r on a is an equivalence relation.

To show that the relation r defined on a, where a = z × z, is an equivalence relation, we need to demonstrate three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

1. Reflexivity: For all (a, b) in a, (a, b) r (a, b).

This means that for any complex number (a, b), we have a * b = a * b, which is true. Therefore, the relation is reflexive.

2. Symmetry: For all (a, b) and (c, d) in a, if (a, b) r (c, d), then (c, d) r (a, b).

Suppose (a, b) r (c, d), which means a * d = c * b. We need to show that (c, d) r (a, b), i.e., c * b = a * d.

By symmetry, the equality a * d = c * b holds, and we can rearrange it to obtain c * b = a * d. Thus, the relation is symmetric.

3. Transitivity: For all (a, b), (c, d), and (e, f) in a, if (a, b) r (c, d) and (c, d) r (e, f), then (a, b) r (e, f).

Since the relation r on a satisfies all three properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity, it is an equivalence relation.

In summary, the relation r defined on a, where a = z × z, is an equivalence relation.

To learn more about equivalence relation, click here: brainly.com/question/31309403

#SPJ11

The correct choice is A. The polynomial has a real zero on the given interval because f(-4) and f(-3) are both negative. To apply the Intermediate Value Theorem, we need to show that the function changes sign between the endpoints of the interval.

Evaluating the function at the endpoints, we find that f(-4) = 117 and f(-3) = 48. Since both values are negative, the function changes sign at some point within the interval. Since f(-4) and f(-3) are both negative, we can conclude that the function must have a zero in the interval [-4, -3]. To approximate the zero, we can use numerical methods such as the bisection method or Newton's method. However, since you only asked for the correct choice and a summary, the exact value of the zero is not necessary for this question.

Learn more about Intermediate Value Theorem here: brainly.com/question/29712240

#SPJ11

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer would be the first one

Step-by-step explanation:

The given system of equation 2x + 4y = 1, 2x + 4y = 1  is an example of a dependent system of equations.

A dependent system of equations is a system of equations where there are an infinite number of solutions, and the equations share the same solution set.

We have to find the relationship between the given equations to determine whether the system is dependent or independent.In this case, both equations are identical.

2x + 4y = 1 is the same as 2x + 4y = 1.

The equations have the same coefficients and the same constant term, which implies that they are parallel lines and coincide with each other.

Thus, the given system of equation 2x + 4y = 1, 2x + 4y = 1

is an example of a dependent system of equations as they share the same solution set.

To know more about  equations, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

The solution to the Towers of Hanoi problem with 7 discs requires approximately 127 moves.

The Towers of Hanoi problem is a classic mathematical puzzle that involves moving a stack of discs from one peg to another while following specific rules.

The problem involves three pegs and a set of discs of different sizes, with the goal being to move the entire stack from the starting peg to the ending peg.

The rules are that only one disc can be moved at a time, and a larger disc cannot be placed on top of a smaller disc.
To find the solution to the Towers of Hanoi problem with 7 discs, we can use the formula [tex]2^n[/tex]- 1,

There n is the number of discs.

Therefore, the solution to the Towers of Hanoi problem with 7 discs would require approximately [tex]2^7[/tex] - 1 = 127 moves.
This may seem like a lot of moves, but it is important to note that the number of moves required increases exponentially with the number of discs.

For example, the solution to the problem with 8 discs would require approximately [tex]2^8[/tex] - 1 = 255 moves and the solution with 9 discs would require approximately 2^9 - 1 = 511 moves.
For similar question on Towers of Hanoi:

https://brainly.com/question/31168259

#SPJ11

The area of the horizontal cross-section at height y is given by A = πr², which becomes A = π(y/4)² = (π/16)y².

Using similar triangles, we can determine the area of a horizontal cross-section at height y of a right circular cone with height h=20 and base radius R=5. Since the cross-section forms a smaller similar cone, the ratio of the height to the radius remains constant. This relationship is expressed as y/h = r/R, where r is the cross-sectional radius at height y. Solving for r, we get r = (y×R)/h = (5×y)/20 = y/4. The area of the horizontal cross-section at height y is given by A = πr², which becomes A = π(y/4)² = (π/16)y².

Learn more about constant here:

https://brainly.com/question/29297153

#SPJ11

The determinant of the matrix b = -2a^4 is -648.

Given: det(a) = 3

To find: det(b) = det(-2a^4)

Solution:

We know that det(kA) = k^n * det(A) where A is a square matrix of order n.

So, det(-2a^4) = (-2)^3 * det(a^4)

Now, using the property det(AB) = det(A) * det(B), we can write:

det(a^4) = det(a) * det(a) * det(a) * det(a) = (det(a))^4 = 3^4 = 81

Therefore, det(-2a^4) = (-2)^3 * 81 = -648

Hence, the determinant of the matrix b = -2a^4 is -648.

Learn more about matrix  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11

The probability of getting two "1's" out of three draws without replacement from the box is 0.3, which matches the first option.

To find the probability of getting two "1's" out of three draws without replacement from a box containing 5 tickets, we can use the following steps:

Step 1: Determine the total number of possible ways to draw three tickets from the box without replacement. This can be calculated using the formula for combinations:

C(5, 3) = 5! / (3! * 2!) = 10

Step 2: Determine the number of ways to draw two "1's" and one other ticket. There are two "1's" in the box, so we can choose two of them in C(2, 2) = 1 way. The third ticket can be any of the remaining three tickets in the box, so we can choose it in C(3, 1) = 3 ways. Thus, there are 1 x 3 = 3 ways to draw two "1's" and one other ticket.

Step 3: Calculate the probability of getting two "1's" by dividing the number of ways to draw two "1's" and one other ticket by the total number of possible draws:

P(two "1's") = 3 / 10

Therefore, the probability of getting two "1's" out of three draws without replacement from the box is 0.3, which matches the first option.

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11