The other characteristics of the hair that could be examined are genetic analysis of Alma Tirtsche's hair and the strands.
Who is Alma Tirtsche?The Gun Alley Murder occurred in Melbourne, Australia, in 1921 when 12-year-old Alma Tirtschke was raped and killed. Due to the fact that she went to Hawthorn West High School and was last seen alive near a bar, the Australian Wine Saloon, her murder generated a lot of media attention.
The case has gained notoriety more subsequently for being a miscarriage of justice. Colin Campbell Ross, then 29 years old, was found guilty of killing Tirtschke and put to death, but he maintained his innocence all the way to the end. Ross's innocence was established by DNA evidence when the case was reexamined decades later, and he was given a posthumous pardon in 2008. Since Ross's arrest, Tirtschke's family has maintained that Ross is innocent and that the proper person was found guilty of killing Tirtschke.
To learn more about genetic analysis visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28265289
#SPJ9
If you are convicted of passing a stopped school bus with its red lights flashing, ____ points will be added to your driving record.
Answer: 4 points
Explanation: If you are convicted of passing a stopped school bus with its red lights flashing, you will be fined at least $100 and four points will be added to your driving record.
What is a court decision?
The legal reasoning justifying why a party won the case.
The court's decision of who won the case.
The plurality opinion of most justices on the Court.
Answer:
The legal reasoning justifying why a party won the case.
freedom of speech is protected under an amendment to what governing document?
Answer:
In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws.
The First Amendment to the US Constitution, as well as numerous state constitutions and state and federal statutes, substantially guarantee freedom of speech and expression in the United States from government restraints.
What is Freedom of Speech?Freedom of speech is a notion that supports an individual's or a community's right to express their beliefs and ideas without the fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal repercussions.
The United Nations has recognized the right to freedom of expression as a basic dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international humanitarian law. Many nations have constitutional amendments that safeguard free expression. In political debate, terms like free expression, freedom of speech, and liberty of speech are used interchangeably.
However, in a legal sense, freedom of expression encompasses any activity involving the seeking, receiving, and transmitting of information or ideas, independent of the media employed.
Learn more about freedom of speech, from:
brainly.com/question/17841333
#SPJ2
The test of ""foreseeability"" is generally used to determine the existence of which element of a negligence case?.
Answer:
Duty of due care
Explanation:
Foreseeability is a personal injury law concept that is often used to determine proximate cause after an accident. The foreseeability test basically asks whether the person causing the injury should have reasonably foreseen the general consequences that would result because of his or her conduct.
Which act made interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle a federal crime and allowed for federal help in prosecuting such cases
Answer:
The Dyer Act
Explanation:
The Dyer Act made interstate transportation of a stolen vehicle a federal crime and allowed for federal help in prosecuting such cases.
What is domestic law.
which rule of the federal rules of civil procedures requires expert witnesses to submit written reports
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.
I hope this helps! :)
Carlos is using a precipitin test at a crime scene. When he applies the antiserum, a cloudy ring forms. What can Carlos MOST likely conclude from
this reaction?
ОА.
He has found animal blood.
Ов,
He has found human blood.
He has found animal hair.
OD
He has found human hair.
Opinion-based question: When facing legal action, should teenagers be held to the same standard as adults? Please explain your answer using reasoning, personal knowledge, and current events.
Just answer the question, please. Don't send the homework link 'cuz I can't access it at all. Use the answer from whatever link you got it from so I can get my homework done.
Answer:
Unless the teenagers do something really bad like so bad that they have to be in prison for 30-35 years then yeah they shouldn't be punished like adults do
Explanation:
______ is a court order permitting a local court officer, such as a sheriff, to seize the debtor's property.
Answer:
An execution
Explanation:
This court order allows the Sheriff's office to collect money or property to get your judgement paid.
A case has reached the Supreme Court, but not as a matter of appeal. How did it most likely get there
Answer:
Invoking original jurisdiction is the only nonappeal way in which cases can reach the Court.
Explanation:
.....
Can I take a Florida Permit exam with the consent of a parent who has a California license?
Do you think a government could function without the Departments? Why or why not?
at least a paragraph and full detail.
please
Answer: Yes&No depends on the kind of government we are trying to become.
Explanation:
"How are both physical evidence and testimonial evidence used in a court of law?"
Answer:
Explanation:
Testimonial evidence is a statement made under oath; also known as direct evidence or prima facie evidence. Physical evidence is any object or material that is relevant in a crime; also known as indirect evidence. Examples are hair, fiber, fingerprints, documents, blood, soil, drugs, toolmarks, impressions, glass.
The Second Amendment is an important part of the Constitution. For this assignment you will need to read the Second Amendment and the secondary source Know Your Rights: A Guide to the United States Constitution to help you answer the following prompt:
“Does the text of the Second Amendment mean that the right to 'bear arms' is unlimited?”
As you prepare to answer this prompt you should follow the format provided below.
Paragraph 1 - Analyze the text of the Second Amendment for yourselves. In order to analyze you should look at each word in the amendment and decide how each part of the amendment relates to the prompt.
Paragraph 2 - Summarize and cite the ideas and information from the secondary sources to provide support for your conclusion in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 3 – Summarize and cite the ideas and information in the secondary sources that go against your conclusions in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 4 – Write an analysis about the strength of the arguments that support or counter their own opinions. You will need to provide an explanation of your thinking about which opinions are stronger by citing specific textual evidence out of the primary and secondary sources.
Answer:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 07–290. Argued March 18, 2008—Decided June 26, 2008
District of Columbia law bans handgun possession by making it a crime
to carry an unregistered firearm and prohibiting the registration of
handguns; provides separately that no person may carry an unlicensed handgun, but authorizes the police chief to issue 1-year licenses; and requires residents to keep lawfully owned firearms
unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device. Respondent Heller, a D. C. special policeman, applied to register a handgun he wished to keep at home, but the District refused.
He filed this suit seeking, on Second Amendment grounds, to enjoin
the city from enforcing the bar on handgun registration, the licensing
requirement insofar as it prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in
the home, and the trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the
use of functional firearms in the home. The District Court dismissed
the suit, but the D. C. Circuit reversed, holding that the Second
Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess firearms and
that the city’s total ban on handguns, as well as its requirement that
firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional even when necessary for
Explanation:
In 1857, the supreme court ruled in the dred scott decision that:
Answer:
The Court decided Dred Scott in 1817 at a time when political tensions about slavery ran high. In that case, the Supreme Court held that no African-American could be a citizen entitled to sue in federal court and that no African-American could become free simply because he was taken into a free state by his owner.
Explanation:
Answer: Slaves had no rights and that they were considered property.
100 POINTS & BRAINLIEST!! In complete sentences, please give one example for each of how driving in rain, snow/ice, and fog can increase the danger and make conditions hazardous. Your answer should include examples of how traction, vision, and steering can be made more dangerous due to the weather condition that you chose. Please list an example for each of the three weather types listed.
in gideon v. wainwright, the united states supreme court ruled that the:
Answer:
Gideon v. Wainwright, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 1963, ruled (9–0) that states are required to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants charged with a felony
Explanation:
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the united states supreme court ruled that the States are compelled to give poor defendants facing criminal charges legal representation.
What is the supreme court?The Supreme court is the highest judiciary body in the country which evaluates whether the laws are practiced properly or not. It helps to check the activities that are unconstitutional in the country and take strict actions against them.
Background information on the case stated that Gideon had been charged with breaking into a pub in Panama City, Florida. Gideon was arrested by the police. Due to his inability to pay for a lawyer, Gideon requested the judge to appoint one for him during his trial.
Following this case, the Supreme Court issued a majority decision on behalf of Gideon in 1963 which ensures the right to legal assistance for poor defendants in criminal proceedings in both federal and state courts.
Learn more about the supreme court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ2
HELP pleasee, I'm on a test!
Which statements are true? Choose all answers that are correct.
A. Senators must be at least 30 years old; members of the House of Representatives must be at least 25.
B. Senators and members of the House of Representatives must agree to serve at least two terms in office.
C. Senators and members of the House of Representatives must live in the state they represent.
D. Senators have to have been a U.S. citizen for nine years prior to being elected; members of the House of Representatives must be American citizens for seven years before being elected.
Answer:
I am pretty sure it's "D"
Explanation:
how did saul become king
Answer:
Saul was chosen king both by the judge Samuel and by public acclamation.
Explanation:
mark me brainliest!
Which is not an example of an employee benefit?
A. Paid time off for holidays
B. Paid time off for illness
C. Health insurance
D. Mandatory pay raises
Answer:
D. Mandatory pay raises
Explanation:
Employee benefits are additional benefits applied with current wage salaries. Answer D is not extra addition onto the current salary, so D is your best option.
Hope that helped you. :)
Which is an example of a draft?
O A. Teller's check
B. Signed contract
C. Certificate of deposit
D. Promissory notes
Answer:
D, i hope you have a good rest of your day and find out the right answer.
Explanation:
Standard probation conditions are applied
in cases involving juveniles
in all cases
is cases of minor crimes
in severe cases
Standard probation conditions are applied in cases that involve Juvenile. So, option A is correct. Standard Probation conditions are applied in cases involving Juveniles.
Though Juvenile probation is a more suitable option than out-of-home placement, a probation sentence still restricts the liberty of a juvenile offender. Juvenile probation programs are ideally established to assist young individuals in correcting their behaviors without removing them from their gatherings.
Juvenile probation is a form of community supervision that may include reporting to a supervisory officer, participation in behavior-modification programming, paying restitution to the victim, testing for drug use, or other conditions. Failure to comply with these conditions may result in a probation violation, which may lead to additional terms, incarceration, or other sanctions or incentives to improve behavior.
Learn more about Juvenile probation:
brainly.com/question/15135398
#SPJ1
Answer:
In all cases
Explanation:
This is because they are the common barriers and rules
Plea bargains typically do nothing to help manage the caseload and resources for the court. Question 10 options: True False
False
Plea bargains help reduce the amount of time it takes to go though a court case and minimize resource use. This is one of the many reasons why courts and the law encourage people to plead guilty even when they are innocent.
I hope this helps! :)
"to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other power vested by this constitution. " alexander hamilton used the clause above to.
The clause was used by Alexander Hamilton in order to convince the federal government to create the First Bank of the United States.
Alexander Hamilton was an American statesman and was also one of the founding fathers. He was influential and was a promoter of the United States constitution.
One of the vital clauses in the Constitution was "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers". This law was used by Alexander Hamilton when he wanted the first bank to be created.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25685887
the pythagorean theorem is a special case of the law of cosines
Answer:
The Pythagorean Theorem is a special case of the law of cosines, a2 + b2 - 2*a*b*cos (theta) = c2 because cos (theta) = 0 when the angle is a 90 degree or right angle. We also learned that the converse of the Pythagorean Theorem is true as
What amendment allowed women to vote.
Answer:
Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Explanation:
What are some of the penalties for violating fraud, waste, and abuse (fwa) laws?.
Fines up to $25,000, up to five years in prison, and exclusion from federal health care programmes are all possible penalties for violating Fraud, Waste and Abuse (FWA) Laws. (e.g., Medicaid & Medicare).
What are penalties?A penalty is a sanction imposed or experienced as a result of breaking a law or rule. a loss, forfeiture, misery, or similar experience brought on by failing to execute a duty. something that is lost, such as a financial sum.
What are Fraud, Waste and Abuse (FWA) laws about?The Fraud, Waste and Abuse (FWA) laws forbid anyone from offering, paying, seeking, or receiving anything of value (referred to as "remuneration") in exchange for directing a person to a provider for services or advising them to purchase goods or services that are eligible for reimbursement under a government health care programme.
To learn more about penalties here:
https://brainly.com/question/25182125
#SPJ2
State laws known as ____________ limit the time within which a party is allowed to bring suit to collect a debt.
Answer: statutes of limitation
can you claim self defense while committing a crime
Answer: It depends on the crime and the circumstances of your defense. If you're committing a serious felony, chances are you won't be able to claim self-defense.
Explanation: