An arrow is shot into a hollow pipe resting on a horizontal table and flies out the other end. While the arrow travels in the pipe, its feathers brush against the walls of the pipe. (a) Which type of collision is the arrow-pipe interaction: elastic, inelastic, or totally inelastic? (b) Is there an instant when the velocity of the arrow relative to the pipe is necessarily zero? (c) Describe the energy conversions in the pipe-arrow system.

The speed of the water leaving a hole in the lawn sprinkler is approximately 4.0 m/s. Using conservation of mass.

To determine the speed of the water leaving a hole in the lawn sprinkler, we can apply the principle of conservation of mass, which states that the mass flow rate is constant at different points along a fluid flow.

The mass flow rate is given by the equation:

mass flow rate = density * area * velocity

Since the density of water remains constant, we can compare the mass flow rate at two different points to find the relationship between their velocities.

Let's consider the water flow inside the hose and at a hole near the closed end.

For the water flow inside the hose:

Area = π * (diameter/2)^2 = π * (1.0 cm / 2)^2 = π * (0.5 cm)^2

Velocity = 2.0 m/s

For the water flow through a hole:

Area = π * (diameter/2)^2 = π * (0.50 cm / 2)^2 = π * (0.25 cm)^2

Velocity = ? (to be determined)

Using the principle of conservation of mass, we can equate the mass flow rates at the two points:

density * Area_hose * Velocity_hose = density * Area_hole * Velocity_hole

Since the density cancels out:

Area_hose * Velocity_hose = Area_hole * Velocity_hole

(π * (0.5 cm)^2) * (2.0 m/s) = (π * (0.25 cm)^2) * Velocity_hole

Simplifying the equation:

(0.25 cm^2) * Velocity_hole = (0.5 cm^2) * (2.0 m/s)

Velocity_hole = (0.5 cm^2) * (2.0 m/s) / (0.25 cm^2)

Velocity_hole ≈ 4.0 m/s

Therefore, the speed of the water leaving a hole in the lawn sprinkler is approximately 4.0 m/s.

learn more about speed here:

https://brainly.com/question/17661499

#SPJ11

The blue star will have a higher surface temperature compared to the red star. It is difficult to determine which star is more luminous .

When observing a red star and a blue star and determining that they are the same size, the star with the higher surface temperature is the blue star. However, the star that is more luminous depends on the size and distance of the stars.In terms of color, blue stars are generally hotter than red stars. This is due to the temperature of the star, with hotter stars appearing blue-white and cooler stars appearing orange-red. Red stars have a lower surface temperature than blue stars, which means they have a longer wavelength and appear red. However, luminosity depends on the star’s size and distance from Earth. A star that is further away from Earth will appear less luminous than a closer star of the same size. Similarly, a larger star will be more luminous than a smaller star if they are both at the same distance from Earth.

learn more about luminous Refer: https://brainly.com/question/32112205

#SPJ11

The frequency of the wave is 2 Hz, and its speed is 3 m/s.

The frequency of a wave refers to the number of complete wave cycles that occur in one second. In this case, the water wave vibrates up and down two times each second. Since each complete wave cycle consists of one crest and one trough, we can conclude that the wave completes one cycle with two crests and two troughs in one second. Therefore, the frequency of the wave is 2 cycles per second or 2 Hz.

The distance between wave crests is known as the wavelength of the wave. In this scenario, the distance between wave crests is given as 1.5 meters. The speed of a wave can be calculated by multiplying its frequency by its wavelength. Therefore, we can determine the speed of the wave as follows:

Speed of the wave = Frequency × Wavelength

Substituting the known values, we have:

Speed of the wave = 2 Hz × 1.5 m = 3 m/s

Hence, the frequency of the wave is 2 Hz and its speed is 3 m/s.

To learn more about frequency

https://brainly.com/question/29739263

#SPJ4

The speed of light in fused quartz is approximately 205,440,706 meters per second.

The speed of light in a medium is given by the equation v = c/n, where v is the speed of light in the medium, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and n is the refractive index of the material.

In the case of fused quartz with a refractive index of 1.46, the speed of light in this material can be calculated as v = c/1.46.

Since the speed of light in vacuum is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second, dividing this value by 1.46 gives us the speed of light in fused quartz.

The speed of light in fused quartz is approximately 205,440,706 meters per second.

Learn more about fused quartz

brainly.com/question/27702289

#SPJ11

The statement "a prediction being correct means that the theory that produced it must be correct" is False because It could be a coincidence or there may be other factors at play that led to the prediction coming true.

A prediction being correct does not necessarily mean that the theory that produced it is correct. A prediction can be accurate based on a flawed or incomplete theory, or it could be the result of chance or coincidence. However, a theory that consistently produces accurate predictions increases its credibility and provides evidence for its validity. Therefore, while a correct prediction does not prove a theory's correctness, it can lend support to it.

For more question on prediction click on

https://brainly.com/question/31433653

#SPJ11

False. A prediction being correct does not necessarily mean that the theory that produced it is correct. Theories are developed based on observations, experiments, and evidence, and they are used to explain and predict natural phenomena.

However, a theory can have limitations, exceptions, and errors that may lead to incorrect predictions. On the other hand, a prediction can be correct even if it was based on an incomplete or inaccurate theory. Therefore, while a correct prediction can support a theory, it cannot prove its accuracy or validity. Scientists constantly test and refine theories based on new evidence and observations, and they strive to develop theories that can provide accurate and reliable predictions.

Additionally, a correct prediction might be a result of chance or coincidence rather than the accuracy of the theory. To validate a theory, it is important to examine its overall consistency, testability, and whether it has withstood repeated scrutiny and experiments.

Learn more about theory here : brainly.com/question/27502489

#SPJ11

Non-store retailing refers to a method of selling goods and services outside of traditional physical retail stores, such as through vending machines.

Non-store retailing encompasses various channels through which products are sold directly to consumers without the need for a physical store.

One common example is the vending machine, where customers can purchase items like sodas, snacks, or other products by inserting money or using a payment card.

Vending machines offer convenience and accessibility, allowing customers to make purchases in various locations, such as office buildings, airports, or public spaces. So, non-store retailing refers to a method of selling goods and services outside of traditional physical retail stores, such as through vending machines.

Learn more about retailing

brainly.com/question/31326848

#SPJ11

Based on the smaller parallax angle of Star X compared to Star Y, the conclusion that can be drawn is that D. Star X is nearer to Earth than star Y.

The parallax angle of a star is inversely related to its distance from Earth. A smaller parallax angle indicates a larger distance from Earth. Therefore, if Star X has a smaller parallax angle than Star Y, it implies that Star X is farther from Earth than Star Y. This conclusion is based on the principle of parallax, which relies on the apparent shift in position of a star relative to background objects as observed from different points in Earth's orbit. Hence, the difference in parallax angles allows us to infer that Star X is located at a greater distance from Earth compared to Star Y.

Learn more about parallax angle here:

https://brainly.com/question/3063547

#SPJ11

The statement that the inertia of an object is measured when the object is at rest in the earth reference frame is false. Inertia is a property of an object that is measured by its mass and is independent of its position or reference frame.

The inertia of an object is not measured when the object is at rest in the earth reference frame. Inertia is defined as the resistance of an object to a change in its state of motion, whether that motion is at rest or in motion.

Therefore, the inertia of an object is not dependent on its position or reference frame.
Inertia is measured by the mass of an object, which remains constant regardless of the reference frame or position of the object. The mass of an object is a measure of the amount of matter it contains and is often measured in kilograms (kg).

The answer is false.
For more such questions on mass

https://brainly.com/question/86444

#SPJ11

A horizontal pipe with a 3 cm diameter that narrows to a 2 cm diameter at a speed of 32 m/s releases water into the air around it. The pipe's larger diameter section's gauge pressure is 512,000 Pa.

To determine the gauge pressure in the larger diameter section of the pipe, we can apply Bernoulli's principle, which states that the total pressure at any point in a fluid system is the sum of the static pressure and the dynamic pressure.

Given:

Diameter of the larger section (D1) = 3 cm = 0.03 m

Diameter of the smaller section (D2) = 2 cm = 0.02 m

Velocity of water (v) = 32 m/s

We'll assume the flow is steady and the fluid is incompressible. The density of water (ρ) is approximately 1000 kg/m³.

Using Bernoulli's principle, we have:

[tex]P_1 + \frac{1}{2}\rho v_1^2 = P_2 + \frac{1}{2}\rho v_2^2[/tex]

Since the larger section of the pipe has a larger diameter, we can assume it has a lower velocity compared to the smaller section.

[tex]P_1 + \frac{1}{2}\rho v_1^2 > P_2 + \frac{1}{2}\rho v_2^2[/tex]

The gauge pressure (P1) in the larger diameter section can be calculated as follows:

[tex]P_1 = P_2 + \frac{1}{2}\rho(v_2^2 - v_1^2)[/tex]

[tex]P_1 = P_2 + \frac{1}{2}\rho(v_2 + v_1)(v_2 - v_1)[/tex]

Since the pipe is open to the surrounding air, we can assume atmospheric pressure (P2) is present in the smaller diameter section.

P2 = 0 (gauge pressure at atmospheric pressure)

Therefore, the gauge pressure in the larger diameter section (P1) is:

[tex]P_1 = \frac{1}{2}\rho(v_2 + v_1)(v_2 - v_1)[/tex]

Plugging in the values, we get:

[tex]P1 = \frac{1}{2} \times 1000 , \text{kg/m}^3 \times (32 , \text{m/s} + 0 , \text{m/s}) \times (32 , \text{m/s} - 0 , \text{m/s})[/tex]

Calculating the expression, we find:

P1 = 512,000 Pa

Therefore, the gauge pressure in the larger diameter section of the pipe is 512,000 Pa.

To know more about the Bernoulli's principle refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/2249706#

#SPJ11

The  ratio of the probability of being in the first excited state to the probability of its being in the ground state is approximately 1/2.

The energy levels of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator are given by:

E_n = (n + 1/2) ℏω

where n is an integer (0, 1, 2, ...) and ω is the characteristic frequency of the oscillator.

At thermal equilibrium, the probability of finding the oscillator in a given energy level is proportional to the Boltzmann factor:

P(n) = exp[-E_n/(k_B T)]/Z

where k_B is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature of the thermal reservoir, and Z is the partition function, which is a normalization factor.

Since T is low enough such that k_B T << ℏω, we can use the approximation:

exp[-E_n/(k_B T)] ≈ 1 - E_n/(k_B T)

(a) The ratio of the probability of being in the first excited state (n=1) to the probability of its being in the ground state (n=0) is:

P(1)/P(0) = [1 - E_1/(k_B T)]/[1 - E_0/(k_B T)]

Substituting the energy levels, we get:

P(1)/P(0) = [1 - (3/2)/(k_B T)]/[1 - (1/2)/(k_B T)]

Simplifying this expression, we get:

P(1)/P(0) = (k_B T)/(ℏω)

(b) Assuming that only the ground state and first excited state are appreciable, the total probability is:

P(0) + P(1) = 1

Substituting the Boltzmann factors, we get:

exp[-E_0/(k_B T)] + exp[-E_1/(k_B T)] = 1

Using the approximation for low temperatures, we get:

2 - [E_0/(k_B T) + E_1/(k_B T)] ≈ 1

Substituting the energy levels, we get:

2 - [(1/2)/(k_B T) + (3/2)/(k_B T)] ≈ 1

Simplifying this expression, we get:

(k_B T)/(ℏω) ≈ 1/2

Therefore, the ratio of the probability of being in the first excited state to the probability of its being in the ground state is approximately 1/2.

Visit to know more about Ground state:-

brainly.com/question/12580955

#SPJ11

A toroid has 250 turns of wire and carries a current of 20 a. its inner and outer radii are 8.0 and 9.0 cm. The magnetic field at radii of 8.1 cm, 8.5 cm, and 8.9 cm are 0.501 T, 0.525 T, and 0.550 T, respectively.

The magnetic field inside a toroid can be calculated using the equation

B = μ₀nI

Where B is the magnetic field, μ₀ is the permeability of free space, n is the number of turns per unit length, and I is the current.

For a toroid with inner radius R₁ and outer radius R₂, the number of turns per unit length is

n = N / (2π(R₂ - R₁))

Where N is the total number of turns.

Substituting the given values, we get

n = 250 / (2π(0.09 - 0.08)) = 198.94 turns/m

Using this value of n and the given current, we can calculate the magnetic field at the specified radii

At r = 8.1 cm:

B = μ₀nI = (4π×10⁻⁷ Tm/A)(198.94 turns/m)(20 A) = 0.501 T

At r = 8.5 cm

B = μ₀nI = (4π×10⁻⁷ Tm/A)(198.94 turns/m)(20 A) = 0.525 T

At r = 8.9 cm

B = μ₀nI = (4π×10⁻⁷ Tm/A)(198.94 turns/m)(20 A) = 0.550 T

Therefore, the magnetic field at radii of 8.1 cm, 8.5 cm, and 8.9 cm are 0.501 T, 0.525 T, and 0.550 T, respectively.

To know more about magnetic field here

https://brainly.com/question/15144434

#SPJ4

To determine the amount of mechanical energy lost by the brick, we can calculate the initial kinetic energy (KE) and final kinetic energy (KE') and find the difference between them.

The initial kinetic energy (KE) of the brick can be calculated using the formula:

[tex]KE = (1/2) * mass * velocity^2[/tex]

where

mass = 1.50 kg (mass of the brick)

velocity = 13.0 m/s (initial velocity of the brick)

[tex]KE = (1/2) * 1.50 kg * (13.0 m/s)^2[/tex]

KE = 126.45 J

The final kinetic energy (KE') of the brick is zero because it comes to a stop. Therefore, KE' = 0 J.

The amount of mechanical energy lost is given by the difference between the initial and final kinetic energies:

Energy lost = KE - KE'

Energy lost = 126.45 J - 0 J

Energy lost = 126.45 J

So, the brick loses 126.45 Joules of mechanical energy.

This energy is typically converted into other forms, such as thermal energy or sound energy. In this case, the energy lost may primarily be converted into heat due to the presence of the rough surface.

The friction between the brick and the surface generates heat energy, resulting in the loss of mechanical energy.

To know more about mechanical energy refer here

https://brainly.com/question/3045950#

#SPJ11

The amount of solar energy reflected by a surface is known as albedo. (option b)

Albedo is a measure of the reflectivity of a surface, expressed as the percentage of incoming solar radiation that is reflected back into space.

Different surfaces have different albedo values, depending on their color, texture, and composition. For example, surfaces that are light-colored and smooth, such as ice and snow, have a high albedo, meaning they reflect a large portion of incoming solar radiation. In contrast, dark-colored and rough surfaces, such as asphalt and soil, have a low albedo and absorb more solar radiation.

The concept of albedo is important in understanding the Earth's climate system, as it affects the amount of solar radiation that is absorbed or reflected by the Earth's surface. Changes in albedo can influence the Earth's temperature, as a higher albedo can reflect more solar radiation back into space and cool the planet, while a lower albedo can absorb more solar radiation and warm the planet.

Therefore, the correct option is b. albedo

Learn more about solar energy at:

https://brainly.com/question/31045772

#SPJ11

The velocity of the gorilla of mass 50 kg, sitting 4 meters above the ground just before hitting the ground is 8.85 m/s.

Velocity is the rate of change of displacement.

To calculate the velocity of the gorilla, we use the formula below

Formula:

Where:

From the question,

Given:

Substitute these values into equation 1 and solve for v

Learn more about velocity here: https://brainly.com/question/29110645

#SPJ1

During the eye surgery, approximately 1.43 x 10^21 photons are released by the laser with a wavelength of 514 nm and a power of 1.3 W, if used for 0.042 s.

In eye surgery, lasers are used to precisely cut or vaporize tissue. The wavelength of a certain laser used in eye surgery is 514 nm and its power is 1.3 W. To calculate the number of photons released by the laser, we can use the formula:

Number of photons = (Power x Time) / Energy per photon

The energy per photon can be calculated using the formula:

Energy per photon = Planck's constant x Speed of light / Wavelength

Substituting the given values in the formula, we get:

Energy per photon = (6.626 x 10^-34 J s) x (3 x 10^8 m/s) / (514 x 10^-9 m)
Energy per photon = 3.859 x 10^-19 J

Now we can use this value to calculate the number of photons released by the laser:

Number of photons = (1.3 W x 0.042 s) / (3.859 x 10^-19 J)
Number of photons = 1.43 x 10^21 photons

Learn more about wavelength here:-

https://brainly.com/question/30611426

#SPJ11

The energy needed to heat 250 g of water from 10.0°C to 85.0 °C IS 1.88 x 10⁴ cal. Therefore, the answer is (b) 1.88x10⁴ cal.

To calculate the energy needed to heat 250 g of water from 10.0°C to 85.0 °C, we need to use the formula:

Q = m x c x ΔT

Where Q is the energy needed (in joules), m is the mass of water (in kilograms), c is the specific heat of water (in joules per kilogram per Kelvin), and ΔT is the temperature change (in Kelvin).

First, we need to convert the mass of water from grams to kilograms:

m = 250 g / 1000 = 0.25 kg

Next, we need to calculate ΔT:

ΔT = 85.0 °C - 10.0°C = 75.0 K

Now, we can substitute these values into the formula:

Q = 0.25 kg x 4186 J/kg K x 75.0 K

Q = 7.85 x 10⁴ J

To convert this to calories, we need to divide by 4.184:

Q = 1.88 x 10⁴ cal

Therefore, the answer is (b) 1.88x10⁴ cal.

To learn more about  energy visit: https://brainly.com/question/13881533

#SPJ11

The apparent weight of the rock when submerged in water is 71.33 N. The apparent weight of the rock when submerged in a liquid with density 1.6 times that of water is 53.89 N.

We can use Archimedes' principle to find the apparent weight of the rock when submerged in water. The buoyant force on an object submerged in a fluid is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object. Thus, the buoyant force on the rock when submerged in water is:

buoyant force = weight of water displaced = density of water x volume of rock x acceleration due to gravity

where the density of water is 1000 kg/m^3.

The weight of the rock in water is then:

weight in water = weight in air - buoyant force

Part 1:

Substituting the given values into the equation above, we get:

buoyant force = (1000 kg/m^3) x (.00292 m^3) x (9.8 m/s^2) = 28.67 N

weight in water = 100 N - 28.67 N = 71.33 N

Therefore, the apparent weight of the rock when submerged in water is 71.33 N.

Part 2:

If the rock is submerged in a liquid with a density exactly 1.6 times that of water, the buoyant force would be:

buoyant force = (1.6 x 1000 kg/m^3) x (.00292 m^3) x (9.8 m/s^2) = 46.11 N

The weight of the rock in this liquid would be:

weight in liquid = 100 N - 46.11 N = 53.89 N

Therefore, the apparent weight of the rock when submerged in a liquid with density 1.6 times that of water is 53.89 N.

learn more about apparent weight here :

brainly.com/question/29751920

#SPJ4

There are three primary ways of interpreting the nature vs nurture debate: Environmental Determinism, Biological Determinism and Interactionism.

Environmental Determinism is the first one. The environment, according to this theory, determines a person's behavior. The premise behind this idea is that humans are born as blank slates and that everything they know is learned through experience. Environmental determinists argue that people's experiences and surroundings are the only factors that shape their behavior. Nurture has the upper hand in this view.

Biological Determinism is the second way of interpreting the nature vs nurture debate. This theory argues that our genes and biology determine our behavior. Those who believe in biological determinism contend that our genes determine everything from our personality traits to our interests. Nature wins out in this view.

Interactionism is the third way of interpreting the nature vs nurture debate. This perspective takes into account the notion that both nature and nurture influence human behavior. This theory argues that human behavior is the product of both nature and nurture, with neither being the dominant factor. In this view, the environment and genetics are viewed as mutually influential rather than exclusive factors.

To know more about nature vs nurture debate, refer

https://brainly.com/question/3085645

#SPJ11

The point p on the x-axis that minimizes the sum of distances pq and pr is (2.5, 0).

        Length of pq: sqrt((x-0)^2 + (0-6)^2) = sqrt(x^2 + 36)

        Length of pr: sqrt((x-5)^2 + (0-7)^2) = sqrt((x-5)^2 + 49)

        sqrt(x^2 + 36) + sqrt((x-5)^2 + 49)

        d/dx [sqrt(x^2 + 36) + sqrt((x-5)^2 + 49)] = 0

For such more questions on plane

https://brainly.com/question/30655803

#SPJ11

So the velocity of the billiard ball is 2.209 × 10^-19 m/s if its wavelength is 7.50 fm.

The wavelength of a particle (such as a billiard ball) is related to its momentum and mass by the de Broglie equation:

λ = h/p

where λ is the wavelength, h is Planck's constant, and p is the momentum of the particle.

We can rearrange this equation to solve for the momentum:

p = h/λ

Substituting the given values, we get:

p = (6.626 × 10^-34 J s)/(7.50 × 10^-15 m)

p = 8.835 × 10^-20 kg m/s

Now we can use the momentum and mass to find the velocity:

p = mv

v = p/m

Substituting the given values, we get:

v = (8.835 × 10^-20 kg m/s)/(0.400 kg)

v = 2.209 × 10^-19 m/s

To know more about wavelength,

https://brainly.com/question/13533093

#SPJ11

Both objects will have the same velocity at the end of the ramp as they have the same mass and radius.

The velocity of a rolling object at the end of a ramp depends on its moment of inertia, which is a measure of how the object's mass is distributed around its axis of rotation. However, both objects have the same mass and radius, so their moments of inertia are also equal. Therefore, both objects will have the same velocity at the end of the ramp, which can be calculated using the conservation of energy principle.

The potential energy at the beginning of the ramp is equal to the kinetic energy at the end of the ramp. The potential energy can be calculated as the product of the mass, acceleration due to gravity, and the height of the ramp, while the kinetic energy can be calculated as the product of half the moment of inertia and the square of the final velocity. Solving for the final velocity gives the same result for both objects.

Learn more about inertia here:

https://brainly.com/question/30134876

#SPJ11

Cold fronts are boundaries between cold air masses and warmer air masses. On the eastern side of the cold front, you'll generally find warm air moving from the south or southeast, while on the western side, you'll find cold air coming from the north or northwest.

The wind speeds on the eastern side tend to be weaker because the warm air is less dense and has lower pressure than the cold air. As the cold front moves eastward, it pushes the warm air upwards, leading to stronger winds on the western side. In addition, the wind direction changes along the front due to the Coriolis Effect and the interaction between the cold and warm air masses.

On the eastern side, the winds blow parallel to the front, while on the western side, they tend to curve counterclockwise, following the cold air mass movement. The differences in wind speed and direction between the eastern and western sides of a cold front are essential in understanding weather patterns and forecasting storms.

You can learn more about Cold fronts at: brainly.com/question/21551311

#SPJ11

part a.

the average power dissipated by the circuit is 960 W.

part b.

the power factor for the circuit is 0.95.

Power is  described as the amount of energy transferred or converted per unit time.

impedance Z = √(R² + (XL - XC)²

R =  resistance,

XL=  inductive reactance

XC =  capacitive reactance.

XL = 2πfL = 2π(200 Hz)(25 mH) = 31.42 Ω

XC = 1/(2πfC) = 1/(2π * (200 Hz) * (30 μF)) = 26.53 Ω

Z = √(15² + (31.42 - 26.53)²) = 25.08 Ω

(a) The average power

P = V² / R

P = (120 V)² / 15 Ω

P= 960 W

(b) The power factor of the circuit :

PF = cos(θ) = R / Z

θ =  phase angle

tan(θ) = (XL - XC) / R

θ = [tex]tan^{-1}[/tex] ((XL - XC) / R)

θ  =[tex]tan^{-1}[/tex] ((31.42 - 26.53) / 15)

θ  = 18.19°

power factor = cos(18.19°) = 0.95

Learn more about Power at:

https://brainly.com/question/1634438

#SPJ1

The radius of the circular path is 3.4 cm. It takes the electron 4.9 x [tex]10^{-8[/tex]s to complete one revolution.

(a) The force on a charged particle moving in a magnetic field is given by the equation:

F = qvBsinθ

In this case, the angle θ is 90 degrees since the electron's path is perpendicular to the field. The charge of an electron is -1.6 x[tex]10^{-19[/tex]coulombs, and the velocity of the electron is 1.43 x [tex]10^7[/tex]m/s. The magnetic field strength is 1.84 mT, which is equivalent to 1.84 x [tex]10^{-3[/tex] T.

So, the force on the electron is:

F = (-1.6 x [tex]10^{-19[/tex]C)(1.43 x [tex]10^7[/tex]m/s)(1.84 x [tex]10^{-3[/tex] T)sin90°

F = -4.64 x [tex]10^{-14[/tex]N

The force on the electron is centripetal, so we can equate it to the centripetal force formula:

F = [tex]mv^2/r[/tex]

where m is the mass of the electron, v is the velocity of the electron, and r is the radius of the circular path.

The mass of an electron is 9.11 x [tex]10^{-31[/tex] kg, so:

mv^2/r = -4.64 x [tex]10^{-14[/tex] N

Solving for r, we get:

r = mv / |q|B

r = (9.11 x [tex]10^{-31[/tex]kg)(1.43 x[tex]10^7[/tex] m/s) / (1.6 x [tex]10^{-19[/tex]C)(1.84 x [tex]10^{-3[/tex] T)

r = 0.034 m = 3.4 cm

(b) The time it takes for the electron to complete one revolution is called the period of revolution, T, and is given by:

T = 2πr/v

where r is the radius of the circular path and v is the velocity of the electron.

Using the values we calculated earlier, we get:

T = 2π(0.034 m) / (1.43 x [tex]10^7[/tex] m/s)

T = 4.9 x [tex]10^{-8[/tex] s

Learn more about magnetic field here:

https://brainly.com/question/14848188

#SPJ11

The distance y on the screen between the central bright fringe and the third-order bright fringe is 0.648 mm.

In Young's double-slit experiment, the bright fringes are observed when the path difference between the light waves from the two slits is equal to an integer multiple of the wavelength (λ) of the light used.

The path difference (Δx) between the light waves from the two slits can be calculated using the formula:

Δx = d sinθ

where d is the distance between the slits and θ is the angle between the line connecting the slits and the screen, and the line from the slits to the bright fringe.

For the central bright fringe, θ = 0, so the path difference is zero. For the third-order bright fringe, the path difference is equal to 3λ.

Using the formula:

y = (λD)/d

where y is the distance between the central bright fringe and the nth-order bright fringe, D is the distance from the slits to the screen, and d is the distance between the slits, we can calculate the distance y on the screen between the central bright fringe and the third-order bright fringe as:

y = (3λD)/d

Substituting the given values, we get:

y = (3 × 664 nm × 2.75 m)/(1.20 × 10⁻⁴ m)

y = 0.648 mm

Therefore, the distance y on the screen between the central bright fringe and the third-order bright fringe is 0.648 mm.

learn more about double-slit experiment HERE:

https://brainly.com/question/30452257

#SPJ11

The wavelength of the photon that carries off the electric potential energy lost by the system is approximately 1.06 nanometers.

The problem involves calculating the wavelength of a photon given the change in electric potential energy in a system. We can use the equation E = hf, where E is the energy of the photon, h is Planck's constant, and f is the frequency of the photon. We can also use the equation E = qV, where E is the change in electric potential energy in the system, q is the charge, and V is the potential difference.

First, we need to calculate the initial and final electric potential energies in the system. We know that the proton is repelled by the point charge and moves from a distance of 0.046 m to 0.17 m. The initial electric potential energy of the system is given by [tex]$E = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4\pi \epsilon r_1}$[/tex], where [tex]q_1[/tex] and [tex]q_2[/tex] are the charges, ε is the permittivity of free space, and r1 is the initial distance between the charges. Plugging in the values, we get [tex]$E_1 = \frac{(1.6\times10^{-19},C)(8.5\times10^{-6},C)}{4\pi(8.85\times10^{-12},F/m)(0.046,m)} = 2.34\times10^{-16},J$[/tex]

Similarly, the final electric potential energy of the system is given by [tex]$E_2 = \frac{(1.6\times10^{-19},C)(8.5\times10^{-6},C)}{4\pi(8.85\times10^{-12},F/m)(0.17,m)} = 4.54\times10^{-17},J$[/tex]

The change in electric potential energy is then [tex]$\Delta E = E_1 - E_2 = 1.88\times10^{-16},J$[/tex]

We can now use the equation E = hf to find the frequency of the photon. Rearranging the equation, we get f = E/h. Plugging in the values, we get

[tex]$f = \frac{1.88\times10^{-16},J}{6.626\times10^{-34},J\cdot s} = 2.83\times10^{17},Hz$[/tex]

Finally, we can use the equation c = λf to find the wavelength of the photon, where c is the speed of light. Rearranging the equation, we get λ = c/f. Plugging in the values,

we get [tex]$\lambda = \frac{3\times10^8,m/s}{2.83\times10^{17},Hz} = 1.06\times10^{-9},m$[/tex], or 1.06 nanometers.

To learn more about wavelength

https://brainly.com/question/4112024

#SPJ4

Cascades and Andes mountains are examples of where one ocean plate subducts beneath another plate. This is known as a convergent boundary where two plates move towards each other.

Phenomenon is that oceanic plates are denser than continental plates, so when they meet, the oceanic plate is forced down into the mantle and melts due to the high pressure and temperature. The melted material then rises to the surface and forms volcanoes, which is what has created the Cascades and Andes mountains.

The Cascades and Andes mountains are formed as a result of the process called subduction. In this process, a denser oceanic plate is forced under a lighter continental plate, creating a subduction zone. This leads to the formation of volcanic arcs and mountain ranges along the boundaries of the converging plates.
To know more about ocean plate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14616849

#SPJ11

The time it takes light to travel from the Earth to the Moon can be calculated using the formula: time = distance / speed. The distance from Earth to the Moon is 3.844×105 km and the speed of light is 2.998×105 km/s. Therefore, the time it takes light to travel from the Earth to the Moon is:

time = 3.844×105 km / 2.998×105 km/s
time = 1.281 seconds

So, it takes approximately 1.281 seconds for light to travel from the Earth to the Moon.
Hi! To calculate the time it takes for light to travel from Earth to the Moon, you can use the formula: time = distance / speed. Given the speed of light is 2.998×10^5 km/s and the average distance to the Moon is 3.844×10^5 km, the time would be:

time = (3.844×10^5 km) / (2.998×10^5 km/s) ≈ 1.282 seconds

So, it takes approximately 1.282 seconds for light to travel from Earth to the Moon.

To know more about speed of light visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29216893

#SPJ11

When a skateboarder is skateboarding along a level concrete path, they need to regularly push with their foot to maintain their motion. This is because of the principles of inertia and friction.

During a push: When the skateboarder pushes with their foot, they exert a backward force on the ground. According to Newton's third law of motion, the ground exerts an equal and opposite force on the skateboarder (action and reaction). This backward force propels the skateboarder forward, providing them with an initial acceleration.

Between pushes: After the initial push, the skateboarder starts to decelerate due to the opposing force of friction. Friction acts in the opposite direction to the skateboarder's motion, and it arises from the interaction between the skateboard's wheels and the surface of the concrete path. This frictional force acts to slow down the skateboarder.

Forces in action: The main forces involved are the force of the skateboarder's push and the force of friction. The push force is unbalanced, as it is the primary force that accelerates the skateboarder forward. On the other hand, the force of friction acts as a balanced force, opposing the motion and eventually bringing the skateboarder to a stop if no additional pushes are made.

Net force and motion: The net force acting on the skateboarder is the difference between the force of the push and the force of friction. Initially, when the skateboarder pushes, the net force is in the forward direction, resulting in an acceleration and an increase in speed. As friction acts to decelerate the skateboarder, the net force decreases until it eventually becomes zero when the forces balance each other. At this point, the skateboarder's speed becomes constant, and they need to push again to overcome friction and maintain their motion.

In summary, the skateboarder needs to regularly push with their foot when skateboarding along a level surface to overcome the opposing force of friction. By exerting a backward force, they create a net forward force that accelerates them. However, the force of friction gradually slows them down, and without regular pushes, their speed would decrease until they come to a stop. The regular pushing action helps to maintain their motion and counteract the opposing forces at play.

To learn more about Newton's law of motion click:

brainly.com/question/29775827

#SPJ1

The energy of the photon emitted in this transition is approximately 0.244 eV

So, the correct answer is A.

To find the energy of the photon emitted when an electron drops from n = 20 to n = 7 in a hydrogen atom, we use the Rydberg formula:

ΔE = -13.6 eV * (1/n1² - 1/n2²), where ΔE is the energy difference, and n1 and n2 are the initial and final energy levels, respectively.

Plugging in the values (n1 = 7, n2 = 20), we get:

ΔE = -13.6 * (1/7² - 1/20²) = -13.6 * (0.0204 - 0.0025) = -13.6 * 0.0179 ≈ 0.244 eV.

The energy of the photon emitted in this transition is approximately 0.244 eV, which corresponds to option A.

Learn more about photon at https://brainly.com/question/14350185

#SPJ11