I think it is cruel and unusual for someone on death penalty to wait that long before being executed when said person should just be executed as soon as they are placed in the prison. It does not benefit the victim of the crime or the family because they have not yet gotten justice of said crime. In my opinion who ever is on the death penalty should be executed as soon as they are placed in the prison instead of sitting in a cell for the amount of chosen time.
btw, i love ur Jungkook profile pic. im a big ARMY
should hate speech be regulated? (in a essay)
Answer:
simple
Explanation:
hate speech should be regulated because it has many adverse effect
1)it can cause war
2)it can cause disunity
3it can frustrate the government efforts
HELP PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
What does the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act do?
It limits the data that websites aimed at children above 13 can collect.
It limits the data that children under 13 can access.
It lets children under 13 access only educational sites.
It limits the data that websites aimed at children under 13 can collect.
Answer:
I think the answer is "It limits the data that websites aimed at children's under 13 can collect."
Answer: It limits the data that websites aimed at children above 13 can access
Explanation: just did test
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST AND 30 points!!! asap pls
Answer:
B
Explanation:
opening mail for someone else
Answer:
are there any more details
Explanation:
Answer:
um what does this question means
Which statement describes an effect of economic dominance on society?
A. Economic dominance encourages education systems to impart moral values to people
B. Economic dominance allows people to spend more time with there families
C. Economic dominance causes education systems to channel there efforts into imparting skills for the job market
D. Economic dominance has led the government to mold its working methods to increase costs
Answer:
C. Economic dominance causes education systems to channel there efforts into imparting skills for the job market
Explanation:
In this type of negligence, both parties are found to be equally at fault and therefore neither side can recover damages.
Answer:
Until relatively recently, tort was one of the areas on Corporate and Business Law that caused candidates the most difficulty. In recent sessions, the tort answers have tended to be stronger, but there is also evidence of some confusion between tort and contract, with negligence-based material frequently arising in answers to contract questions.
Public safety! Answer please
Answer:
At a high level, public safety involves protecting the public safeguarding people from crimes, disaster, and other potential dangers and threats. In the United States, public safety is the dedicated responsibility of certain government organizations and local departments.
Interview Question Legal Illegal How many times a month were you late for work at your last job? Do you have any mental illnesses? What year did you graduate from high school? Did you graduate from high school?
Answer:
Legal and Illegal Interview Questions:
Legal:
How many times a month were you late for work at your last job?
Did you graduate from high school?
Illegal:
Do you have any mental illnesses?
What year did you graduate from high school?
Explanation:
Employers of labor should be aware of some interview questions, which are deemed legal, and some others that may be deemed illegal to ask job candidates. For this reason, employers should be careful to ensure they play by the rules. The illegal questions are considered so because they tend to exacerbate discrimination. Examples of interview questions that are deemed illegal are questions relating to age. Others include questions about marital status and parental status. Some other illegal questions relate to citizenship status, mental illness status, religious affiliations, and race or skin color.
Choosing a legal career is not easy, in addition to the possibilities, there is the weight of participating in one of the most important and influential careers in society. This means that those who chose this type of career have a lot of dedication to all the academic material that will be submitted, from the first year of study. In addition, it is necessary to think rationally, since this is a branch, where acting out of emotion and impulse is not stimulated, it is necessary to think, research and reason before making any choice. Lastly, it is necessary to always keep the focus, so as not to succumb to the needs that may arise halfway.
Question Completion:
What skills are required for a legal career?
Answer:
The skills required for a legal career are:
1. Dedication
2. Rational thinking
3. Ability to research
4. Focus
Explanation:
The above mentioned four skills are required of a legal practitioner, starting from the school days and throughout the practitioner's professional life. Without these skills, success cannot be attained. A legal practitioner must judge issues based on facts and reason, without employing emotions. Thinking rationally, employing reason instead of emotions in decisions, and carrying out in-depth research, the legal practitioner is set for career success.
Need help on 6 no retakes
Answer:
its a
Explanation:
Answer: A. The electrical force is reduced.
If a taxpayer's 2020 household income of $60,000 places the taxpayer at 350% of the federal poverty level, what is the taxpayer's normal expected contribution when calculating the refundable tax credit for which the taxpayer may be eligible under the PPACA to purchase a qualified health plan?
Answer:
The answer is $5,700.
Explanation:
With an income of $ 60,000, the tax payer is at 350% of the Federal Poverty Level or FPL, so the normal expected contribution is 9.5% of his income.
The normal expected contribution = 9.5% of his income
= 60000*9.5%
= $5,700
Therefore, The taxpayer's normal expected contribution when calculating the refundable tax credit for which the taxpayer may be eligible under the ppaca to purchase a qualified health plan is $5,700.
When the father of Stephen and Chris Nuss died, the two boys, aged 15 and 12 years, began to work the family farm. While the boys were still under the age of majority, their mother, Lois, kept the books Page 727for the farm. As the boys grew older, they took more and more responsibility in running the farm. They also rented and worked additional acres of farmland. They financed these rental agreements on their own, but their mother co-signed for the arrangements. The boys also purchased additional farmland. Again, their mother helped in this purchase by co-signing. When Chris decided to leave farming, Stephen paid him $100,000, and in exchange, Chris signed over the deed to the newly purchased land. Lois was not involved in this transaction. Stephen’s farming business grew. He eventually amassed more than 1,200 acres. He and his wife, Linda, kept their own financial records and maintained their own checking account for the running of the farm. Stephen’s mother was not involved in any of this detail. However, Stephen continued to pay many of the expenses involved on the original farm, where his mother still maintained her residence. Stephen also paid the insurance, maintenance, and repair expenses on all buildings and equipment on the original farm. Because Stephen continued to farm this land, in addition to the land he had subsequently purchased, these payments were always characterized as rent. No other payments went to Stephen’s mother. When Stephen died, Linda, his widow and executor, claimed that a partnership existed and that the farm equipment on the original acreage and original acreage itself belonged to that partnership. Lois argued that no partnership between Stephen and her existed. Is Linda or Lois correct? Did a partnership exist? Explain. [See: In re Estate of Nuss, 646 N.E.2d 504 (OH).]
Which of the following identifies how the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the women's rights movement influenced the trends shown in
the line graph?
A. Affirmative action policies applied equal pay laws to employees of state governments.
B. Affirmative action policies applied equal pay laws to employees of the federal govemment.
C. Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in all sectors of the economy
D. Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in traditionally male-dominated fields
Answer:
maybe i think option c Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in all sectors of the economy.
Your friend says that blood stains analysis is not that important to solving a crime. Use what you learned in the module to convince them it is
Answer:
Ummm I dont see the question but you have to be careful about plagiarism
Explanation:
Which position do proponents of situational crime prevention hold in terms of criminal disposition?
A.
They accept the idea that people have criminal dispositions.
B.
They reject the idea that people have criminal dispositions.
C.
They believe that criminal dispositions are prominent in people raised in troubled homes.
D.
They believe that criminal dispositions are prominent in people raised in low-income families.
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
the others are incorrect.
Answer:
Its A
Explanation:
I took the test
Gender Equality at workplace
What happens when a case is reversed and remanded?
A. the respondent wins and the case is ended
B. the case is returned to the lower court for further action
C. the petitioner wins and the case is ended
Answer:
b. the case is returned to the lower court for further action
What limits does the constitution place on the power of Congress to tax?
Answer:
The Constitution places four limits on congress's power to tax.
Explanation:
1. Congress may tax only for public purposes, not for private benefit
2. Congress may not tax exports
3. Direct taxes must be apportioned among the States, according to their populations.
4. Indirect taxes must be levied at a uniform rate in all parts of the country.
what is the longest river
Answer: The Nile river
The Nile river is the longest river to this date being 4,100 miles the longest ever recorded in human history
the development of fundamental rights protection in the EU
Answer:
The 1984 draft treaty establishing the European Union specified that the Union must protect the dignity of the individual and recognize for everyone falling within its jurisdiction the fundamental rights and freedoms derived from the common principles of the national constitutions and the ECHR.]
Make sure to paraphrase this. I got this from the internet.
Which of the following is an example of passive income
Answer:
there isn't anything showing. I can't help if I can't see the actual problem.
Answer:
food
Explanation:
As a rule, the judges can and do make different decisions in cases before them by distinguishing previous cases that might have applied before’. Which law tradition does NOT belong to this principle mainly?
Answer:
For long it has been the received opinion that judges filled in the gaps left by rules by using their discretion. Positivistic jurisprudence from Austin to Hart placed strong emphasis on the part played by judges in the exercise of their discretion. "In these cases it is clear", Hart has said, "that the rule-making authority must exercise discretion, and there is no possibility of treating the question raised by the various cases as if there were one uniquely correct answer to be found, as distinct from an answer which is a reasonable compromise between many conflicting interests". A competing view was espoused by the realists who placed absolute emphasis on the discretion of judges and relegated the "rules" to an obscure position. Earlier, little attention was paid to the analysis of discretion. However, a determined effort has been made lately by Ronald Dworkin, who has cast serious doubts on the orthodox opinion and has emerged as the principal opponent of Hart. Dworkin's views have posed a sustained challenge to the positivist account and have received critical acclaim by leading jurists of the world.
Which statement best describes how due process has been applied in Supreme Court rulings?
The Supreme Court has ruled defendants have a right to due process under the law and cannot be denied the right to an attorney, nor illegal evidence used against them.
Explanation: