Answer:
D. The rapid deterioration of soil in Western states
Answer:
D. The rapid deterioration of soil in Western states
Explanation:
What city served as the capital of the United States? Why?
Answer:
dc
Explanation:
Explain how the Earth’s surface can be organized into continents and oceans. Describe this way of organizing the Earth in at least two to three sentences.
Answer:
One way to organize our world is to separate it into continents and oceans. Our continents are Earth’s largest land masses. The Earth’s land masses are divided into seven different continents. Our oceans are actually connected as part of one large body of water, but we split it into four different pieces. We organize our world by giving names to these continents and oceans.
What was the difference between north and south on the issue of slavery in the years leading up to the Civil War?
Answer: The major difference between the North and the South -- and the one most responsible for the Civil War -- was the institution of slavery. In the North, slavery was almost universally prohibited by the 1800s, while the institution was a cornerstone of Southern society. In the North, many blacks were free, and in states such as Massachusetts, New York and Ohio, 100 percent of the black population was free. In the states of the Confederacy, by contrast, few blacks were free.
Explanation: pls give me brainliest thanks :D
Describing 5 ways the American culture has changed throughout time. What in your opinion, is the most important change in the history of U.S. Immigration/Migration and why do you think this is so? Support your answer.
Answering u get it tell me
Explanation:
What was the results of the Jewish-Roman war of 66 CE?
Answer:
The Romans defeated the Jews under the command of Titus, who destroyed the rebellion.
Explanation:
This war actually started as a rebellion of Jews against the Roman rule in Judea. It lasted for four years. Although in the beginning the rebels had certain success the rebellion was destroyed in 70 CE. Judea was totally under control of Rome once again.
The period leading up to 1789 and the French Revolution was marked plentiful food,good weather for crops, and peace in the region.
Is this True or False?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The period 1789 and the French Revolution, the country was under crises. Agriculture dependent on nature, the growing population, placed limitations on its expansion after a time. The rising population place a demand on food grains, and consequently, the land under cultivation had extended. Before the French Revolution, the class division and increases in taxes had led peasants to become poor, and people from the third estate could not pay the price of food. Food was in scarcity, and there was a hostile situation in France where people were always hunger and fighting.
The government of a country led by a kind would be a?
Answer:
A monarchy is a government ruled by a king or a queen who inherits their position from their family, which is often called the "royal family."
Explanation:
I assume you meant king? If not, I apologize.
What do you know about the diffirent literart periods in philippine literature
Answer:
literary traditions of Philippine literature -- Native, Islamic, Spanish, American, and Nationalist – which in turn belong to any of the three historical periods of Philippine history: Pre-Colonial, Colonial, and Post-Colonial.
Which of the following amendments guarantees future rights for the people?
0 10th
7th
8th
0 9th
Answer: 9th amendment
Explanation:
Why was one major effect of American victory in the revolutionary war
Answer:
The Revolution opened new markets and new trade relationships. The Americans' victory also opened the western territories for invasion and settlement, which created new domestic markets. Americans began to create their own manufacturers, no longer content to reply on those in Britain.
Explanation:
Answer: the revolution opened new markets
Explanation:
using the poem revolutionary tea answer the following questions who do you think wrote this poem A. king/ queen of england B. parliament C. colonist or D.Native Americans
Answer:
b.parliament
Explanation:
How did barometers advance science?
A They allowed scientists to study objects in space.
B They allowed scientists to measure temperature.
C They allowed scientists to measure pressure.
D They allowed scientists to observe objects closely.
Answer:
C. They allowed scientists to measure pressure.
They allowed scientists to measure pressure is the barometers to advance science. Hence, option C is correct.
What is barometers?The atmospheric pressure, sometimes referred to as barometric pressure, is measured using a device called a barometer. The term “atmosphere” refers to the air layers that surround the Earth.
Everything that comes into contact with that air feels the pressure of gravity pulling it to Earth. The barometer works by weighing the mercury inside the glass tube against the air pressure, much like a set of scales.
A tool for measuring air pressure and forecasting weather changes. A stable barometer with a high value, which indicates a high pressure, indicates nice weather. There is a high pressure system right now.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more details about barometers, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2856885
#SPJ6
What is our claim statement?
The English and colonists did not like each other
There was rising tension between the colonists and the English government in the 1760s and 1770s
I wish pizza could always have pineapple
Mrs. Wilson loves history
What is the first piece of evidence that supports the claim?
What is the second piece of evidence that supports the claim?
What is the third piece of evidence that supports the claim?
Answer:
Explanation:
The first one is the claim, because it's an opinion you are trying to back with evidence.
The first piece of supporting evidence is the second one, because it is based on facts that support your claim. The third one is an opinion, and the forth one is an unrelated fact.
Which of the following is an example of the reciprocity norm? A. helping a young child learn algebra B. doing weekly chores for one’s parents C. leaving the waiter a tip while traveling D. treating oneself to a movie night
Answer:
B.
doing weekly chores for one’s parents
Explanation:
An example of the reciprocity norm is doing weekly chores for one’s parents. Thus the correct option is B.
What is the reciprocity norm?To help both parties, reciprocity necessitates trading commodities and services. People must respond to other people's perspectives, according to the basic principle of personal communication.
When someone does something for us, humans must return in kind. It can be characterized as the hope that others would return favors by exchanging advantages in both good and negative ways.
The emphasis is indeed not always on financial benefit but means making an effort to meet the wants and desires of another person. Its characteristics are represented through performing weekly duties for one's parents.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about reciprocity norms, here:
brainly.com/question/29434678
#SPJ7
State governments are required to
Answer:
State and local governments exercise important functions in the United States. They plan and pay for most roads, run public schools, provide water, organize police and fire services, establish zoning regulations, license professions, and arrange elections for their citizens.
Answer:
State governments are required to run public schools, provide water, organize fire department and police services, and arrange elections.
Explanation:
emilythompson35464 hope it helps srry if it doesn't tho
__________ are the political leaders of the United States who helped in creating its system of government.
A.
The followers of Shays’ Rebellion
B.
Congress
C.
The Supreme Court justices
D.
The Framers
Answer:
B I hope this helps and is right!
We should raise taxes on the richest Americans to pay for the things our country needs.
Strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree and describe your opinion in AT LEAST two sentences.
This is something where the answer will depend on which side you pick. So you have a choice on what to do. Here are two viewpoints.
---------------
In favor:
I agree that we should raise taxes on the wealthiest people in the country because they can afford to pay them. Their lifestyle won't be affected too much compared to someone who is struggling to put food on the table, pay rent, or pay for health insurance. Wealthy Americans take advantage of various infrastructure everyday and possibly don't realize it, so it makes sense to have them pay their fair share. With the wealthy contributing more, it gives the lower class workers a more fair share to get a better foot hold and have a higher standard of living. The more people with a higher standard of living, the better the country off is as a whole.
---------------
Against:
I don't agree that we should raise taxes on wealthy Americans. Higher taxes discourages people from earning money since those in a higher tax bracket are going to pay a higher rate. This unintended consequence pushes people to stay in a lower bracket and not earn their full potential. Also, higher taxes chases people away to lower/no tax locations. In a sense, it's like pursuing the path of least resistance. Even if the tax money was collected, it is likely to be spent in places where it shouldn't possibly due to corruption or incompetence.
---------------
Of course these are just basic outlines to help you get started when it comes to writing your response. Feel free to add or take away anything that fits your style.
Answer: Yes
The wealthy earn a lot of money. It would benefit our country if they pay some money to pay for the things our country needs.
If they have so much money, can they not pay some taxes?
What is Paul's main point about the new legislation?
Read the quote.
It is incredible to me that any woman should consider the
fight for full equality won. It has just begun. There is
hardly a field, economic or political, in which the natural
and unaccustomed policy is not to ignore women. ..
Unless women are prepared to fight politically they must
be content to be ignored politically.
-Alice Paul,
Following the passage of the 19th Amendment, 1920
O The new law will bring women their goal of equal
rights very soon.
O Women should naturally expect to be treated more
fairly under the new law.
O Women must fight each other politically to achieve
true equality under the law.
O The new Taw giving women the right to vote was a
first step in the long road to equality.
Answer: The new law giving women the right to vote was a first step in the long road to equality.
Just took the test btw
Why Americans do not vote
Answer:
theyy dont care
Explanation:
Explanation:
this is because in America everything is on like son took place of his father and become the king but in other countries like India a prime minister and president is elected in election after every 5 years and then a Prime Minister or president is elected
True or False: For cities and complex civilizations to develop they needed a surplus of food (made possible through developments in agriculture). Group of answer choices
Answer:
True
Explanation:
I beleive that I have learned this before.
What happened after the death so mandatory muss
Answer:
Nothing has to be done after a person's death.
Explanation:
After the death, how long you can stay with the body may depend on where death happens.
Evaluate the fall of Rome in comparison to modern day America. Are there any problems that Rome faced that the us is currently facing ? If so how are these issue similar to Rome and how they different ?
Tonight is my due day :(((*sob*
Answer:
Rome had struggled a lot with diease like the black plague and many others which can relate with the Coronavirus! It's different because now we have more modern science so we understand how it spreads and why!
Explanation:
:D
witch one is it A or B
help ASAP!!!!!!
Answer:
l think is A.
Explanation:
Why did European citizens believe in the value of sovereignty
Answer:
Within Europe and the Union national and European political decision makers have several different views of sovereignty. Political science often defines it as the ability to achieve a goal or to assert one's will. More commonly sovereignty can be defined as supreme authority, over which there is no other higher authority. This is often the sense given to the term and used by Europhobic populists when they call for a return to national sovereignty, of which the European Union is said to have deprived their State. In this sense sovereignty seems to be understood as a freedom, which means not being, or no longer being forced to do what others want us to do. However, in the Union approaches to sovereignty are complex, since positive and negative ideas of it coexist. In simple terms we can lay out a dominant model in which some see a defensive kind of sovereignty, a means of protection from external threats, whilst others see it rather as a means to attract external assets by transferring certain competences to the supranational level, to increase the visibility of their individual interests and assets by pooling the latter. This model, which in fact pitches national protection against regional integration, opposes two types of State. On the one hand, there are the former dominant States like France and the UK, which are still attached to certain attributes of sovereignty; on the other, there are smaller States that are more oriented towards taking greater advantage of cooperation. Although this model conceals the complexity of views regarding sovereignty, it does however tend to explain the existence of different political agendas and ways of exercising power in Europe. Hence, sovereignty does not appear to be considered in a uniform manner. It opposes those who see it as an opening to those who see it as a means to closure, both on a national and European political level, which can seriously affect policy in Europe. The aim is now to place these ideas of sovereignty in the context of the 21st century, to refine the study of these complex relations, which are not sovereignty but sovereignties.
We should defund some of the budgets of police departments and use that money for social services, and there should be major changes to the way police do their jobs.
Strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree and describe your opinion in AT LEAST two sentences.
Who was more likely to agree with a silver standard?
Industrialists in the north
Farmers in the south
Factory workers
Gold miners in Alaska
Answer:
Farmers in the south
Explanation:
The silver standard was a monetary policy in the 19th century in the United States that provide the unlimited coinage of silver into money on demand.
Farmers in the south supported the silver standard the most because now farmers can get benefit from higher prices for their crops and cable to decrease their credit burdens. Farmers were under high debt as they take credits from businessmen, who were taking advantage of deflation and repayment of loans through gold.
Hence, the correct answer is "Farmers in the south".
Cool, dense air, from other places flows in to replace this warm air, which we feel as _________________.
Answer:
As it rises, the bubble cools with the heat contained in the bubble moving into the atmosphere. As the hot air mass rises, the air is replaced by the surrounding cooler, more dense air, what we feel as wind.
Explanation:
The answer to this question.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
i think its right
PLZZ I NEED THIS NOW Why have debates become more consistent since 1987?
Answer:
it is alot easier for the public to beable to see what unfolds
Explanation:
How did the Magna Carta establish representative democracy?
It gave people a voice in government.
It promised people the right to a trial by jury.
It said that people should not be arrested unlawfully.
It promised that the law was the same for all people.
Answer:
here's your answer
option a. (it gave people a voice in government) is correct answer.
please mark me as brainliest
Answer:
i believe it is option A
Explanation: