At the heart of the Iran-Contra scandal was Reagan's desire to circumvent a U.S. congressional ban on funding the Contras, a rebel group fighting against the Sandinista government in Nicaragua.
The Iran-Contra scandal emerged during the mid-1980s when it was revealed that the Reagan administration had engaged in secret and unauthorized activities. Reagan's desire to support the Contras, who were opposing the left-wing Sandinista government in Nicaragua, collided with a U.S. congressional ban on providing them with military aid. In an effort to evade this prohibition, Reagan's administration devised a clandestine plan that involved selling arms to Iran, despite Iran being an adversary of the United States.
The proceeds from these arms sales were then covertly funneled to the Contras, bypassing the explicit congressional prohibition. Reagan's underlying motivation was two-fold. Firstly, he aimed to gain leverage with Iran to secure the release of American hostages held in Lebanon, hoping to enhance his administration's image domestically. Secondly, by generating funds from the arms sales, he intended to provide financial support to the Contras, thereby continuing the U.S. policy of aiding their efforts against the Sandinistas. However, these actions violated both U.S. law and Reagan's own public assertions, leading to a major political scandal that tarnished his presidency and raised significant concerns about executive overreach and accountability.
To learn more about congressional click here:
brainly.com/question/30035391
#SPJ11
who was the first to exploit the oil reserves in southwest asia?
Anglo-Persian Oil Company was the first to exploit the oil reserves in Southwest Asia.
The first to exploit the oil reserves in Southwest Asia (also known as the Middle East) were the Western oil companies, particularly the British and the Americans. The discovery of oil in the region began in the early 1900s, with the first major oil discovery being made in Iran (then known as Persia) in 1908. This led to the establishment of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (later renamed as BP), which began extracting and exporting oil from the region.
Other Western oil companies, such as Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Texaco, followed suit, establishing their own operations in the region. They made huge profits from the oil reserves, which were abundant and relatively easy to extract.
The exploitation of oil reserves in Southwest Asia had a major impact on the region's economy and politics. It led to the rise of powerful oil-producing states such as Saudi Arabia, which used their oil wealth to modernize their countries and influence global politics. However, it also had negative consequences, such as the environmental damage caused by oil extraction and the exploitation of local workers.
In conclusion, the first to exploit the oil reserves in Southwest Asia were the Western oil companies, particularly the British and the Americans, who established operations in the region in the early 1900s. Their exploitation of the region's oil reserves had far-reaching impacts on the economy and politics of the region and the world at large.
Learn more about Anglo-Persian Oil Company:
https://brainly.com/question/3702288
#SPJ11
What impact did japan's main domestic issues hav on foreign policy
Japan's main domestic issues had a significant impact on its foreign policy. Japan's domestic issues had a direct influence on its foreign policy decisions. One of the key domestic issues was the country's struggling economy.
Japan experienced periods of economic stagnation and recession, which prompted the government to focus on revitalizing the economy through exports and international trade. This led to a more assertive foreign policy approach as Japan sought to expand its economic influence and secure access to resources and markets abroad.
Another domestic issue that affected Japan's foreign policy was its aging population and declining birthrate. The demographic challenges posed a threat to Japan's future economic growth and stability.
In response, Japan sought to attract foreign workers and promote international cooperation on issues such as healthcare and social welfare. This influenced Japan's engagement with other countries and international organizations to address demographic and labor-related concerns.
Furthermore, domestic political dynamics, such as debates on constitutional reform and national security, also shaped Japan's foreign policy stance. The government's decisions on these issues had implications for its regional and global relationships, particularly with neighboring countries and strategic partners.
Learn more about international trade here :
https://brainly.com/question/28827880
#SPJ11
Tommy is cooperative with having his xrays taken but unfortunately the xray reveals a significant infection and his tooth will need to be extracted his jaw is swollen and an abscess has deveoped the dentist has explained to mrs tuff that treatment is necessart as soon as possible as mrs tuff leaveas the treatment room tommy begins to cry and throw a tantrum he refuses to open his mouth what is best course of actionb to ensure tommy can be treated today and that the procedure will go smoothly
The best course of action to ensure Tommy can be treated today and that the procedure will go smoothly is to start with a conversation.
Before any further treatment begins, it is important to understand why Tommy is having difficulty and to try and identify what the root cause is. It could be that Tommy is scared or in pain and reassuring him that he is in good hands and that they are there to help could help to reduce the anxiety.
If possible, it might help to allow Tommy to bring a toy or a family member into the examination room to help ease his nerves. Additionally, trying to distract Tommy with singing/talking to him and making the situation more pleasant could help to keep him relaxed and allow him to cooperate. If the situation continues to escalate, a short break might be beneficial to allow Tommy to calm down and for the staff to go through the treatment plan in more detail.
To know more about anxiety, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/3253078
#SPJ4
all of the following factors contributed to american economic growth between 1820 and 1860, except:
Option B) increasing population is Correct. The period from 1820 to 1860 in the United States was characterized by significant economic growth, which was driven by a variety of factors.
Some of the key factors that contributed to this growth include:
Agricultural innovations, such as the invention of the cotton gin, which increased the productivity of crops like cotton and helped to spur the growth of the textile industry.
The expansion of railroads and other forms of transportation, which made it easier to move goods and people around the country.
The growth of manufacturing, as new technologies and new markets for goods emerged.
The development of new resources, such as oil and natural gas, which helped to fuel economic growth in the latter part of the period.
However, the factor that is not listed as contributing to American economic growth during this period is the maintenance of low tariff rates. While tariffs did play a role in American economic growth in the 19th century, they were not a significant factor during the period from 1820 to 1860.
Learn more about economic Visit: brainly.com/question/30631117
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
All of the following factors contributed to American economic growth from 1820 to 1860 EXCEPT the:
A) maintenance of low tariff rates.
B) increasing population.
C) abundance of natural resources.
D) improved transportation
E) influx of European capital.
When nations take their specialized
products and trade them with other
nations for their own specialized
products, which of the following is
occurring?
A. comparative specialization
B. specialization exchange
C. specialization advantage
D. disadvantage specialization
2001: 2071 faternational Academy of Science. All Rights Reserved.
Using Altern
Serven
Answer: B- specialization exchange
Explanation:
if they are trading specialized objects then they are doing an exchange but not for any regular objects but specialized objects.
why did president franklin d. roosevelt withhold support for the league of nations' condemnation of japanese and german aggression in 1933?
President Franklin D. Roosevelt withheld support for League of Nations' condemnation of Japanese and German aggression in 1933 to prioritize domestic economic issues and maintain neutrality.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt's primary concern in 1933 was dealing with the economic challenges of the Great Depression and implementing his New Deal policies to revive the U.S. economy. This domestic focus influenced his decision to withhold support for the League of Nations' condemnation of Japanese and German aggression.
Roosevelt's administration adopted a policy of neutrality, aiming to avoid involvement in international conflicts. By refraining from openly criticizing Japanese and German aggression, Roosevelt sought to maintain a position of neutrality and prevent the United States from being dragged into potential conflicts.
Furthermore, Roosevelt's administration was also aware of the limited effectiveness of the League of Nations in addressing international conflicts and saw it as an organization that lacked sufficient enforcement mechanisms to effectively curb aggression by its member states.
Overall, Roosevelt's decision reflected a combination of domestic priorities, a desire for neutrality, and skepticism towards the League of Nations' ability to address global aggression effectively.
Learn more about Japanese and German aggression click here :brainly.com/question/2609744
#SPJ11
What was the Monroe Doctrine?
The Monroe Doctrine is a United States foreign policy position that opposes European colonialism in the Western Hemisphere. It holds that any intervention in the political affairs of the Americas by foreign powers is a potentially hostile act against the United States.
Answer:
The Monroe Doctrine was the declaration by President James Monroe , in December 1823, that the United States would not tolerate a European nation colonizing an independent nation in North or South America. The United States warned it would consider any such intervention in the Western Hemisphere to be a hostile act.
it has been argued that the driving force behind every u.s. action in the middle east is based on america getting access to the oil. which of the following action appears to support this action?
Support of Iran which allowed for the US to obtain 40% of the oil fields in that country, appears to support the argument that the driving force behind every U.S. action in the Middle East is based on America getting access to the oil. Therefore, the correct option is B.
This is because the United States' support of Iran during the reign of the Shah allowed American companies to acquire a significant stake in the Iranian oil industry. This move was seen as a strategic move to secure access to oil resources in the Middle East, which is a vital component of the American economy and global energy security.
Options A and C do not necessarily support the argument as they are related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Iran-Iraq war, respectively, and do not directly relate to the acquisition of oil resources. Therefore, the answer is option B.
Note: The question is incomplete. The complete question probably is: It has been argued that the driving force behind every U.S. action in the middle east is based on America getting access to the oil. Which of the following action appears to support this action. A) Support of the partition of Israel and Palestine B) Support of Iran which allowed for the US to obtain 40% of the oil fields in that country C) Involvement in the Iran-Iraq war D) All of the above.
Learn more about Oil industry:
https://brainly.com/question/27133073
#SPJ11
why did emperor alexius 1 close the gates of constantinople to the vast majority of european crusaders
Emperor Alexius I closed the gates of Constantinople to the vast majority of European crusaders due to concerns about maintaining control over his capital, avoiding potential conflict with the Crusaders, and protecting the Byzantine Empire from a possible military threat.
Emperor Alexius I of the Byzantine Empire, during the First Crusade in the late 11th century, made the decision to close the gates of Constantinople to most of the European crusaders. There were several reasons behind this choice. Firstly, Alexius wanted to maintain control over his capital and prevent a large influx of foreign troops that could disrupt the stability of the city. By allowing only a limited number of Crusaders into Constantinople, he could exercise greater control over the situation.
Secondly, there were concerns about potential conflicts arising from the arrival of different Crusader groups with diverse motivations and objectives. The Byzantine Empire had its own strategic goals, and Alexius wanted to minimize the potential clashes and maintain diplomatic control over the Crusader movement.
Lastly, closing the gates served as a defensive measure to protect the Byzantine Empire from the possibility of a military threat. The Crusaders were a formidable force, and Alexius wanted to avoid a scenario where the city could be overwhelmed by a large number of Crusader armies. By allowing a select group of Crusaders while keeping the majority outside the city walls, Alexius could better manage any potential military threat and safeguard the interests of his empire.
To learn more about constantinople click here brainly.com/question/14235394
#SPJ11
It became one of the most important cities in the Mediterranean world and remains so today.
By 332 BC, Syria, Egypt, and Palestine belonged to Alexander. By 327 BC, Alexander had reached
India. He wanted to keep marching east, but his troops were tired of fighting. Alexander agreed
to return west as far as Babylon. He hoped to eventually launch more campaigns, but he died of
a mysterious fever at the age of thirty-two,
What is the central idea of this passage?
A. Alexander was a skilled, merciful military leader who gained the respect of many people.
B. Alexander only attacked the enemy during the day.
C. Aristotle taught Alexander to appreciate Greek culture and the arts.
D. Alexander founded the city of Alexandria in Egypt.
Answer:
A. Alexander was a skilled, merciful military leader who gained the respect of many people.
After independence, which group in Burundi held the power?
Answer:
Explanation:
in 1948, belgium allowed the region to form political parties. these factions contributed to burundi gaining its independence from belgium, on 1 july 1962. i hope it helps :)
Answer:
Peacetime ushered in an era in which the ruling CNDD-FDD party dominated the political space in Burundi. President Pierre Nkurunziza, and a small clique of military generals from the party, tightly controlled the country. In 2005, Pierre Nkurunziza, became the first post-transitional president.
in the spanish system of castas (caste) what were moriscos in fifteenth-century spain?
The Moriscos in fifteenth-century Spain were individuals of mixed ancestry, specifically those with Moorish and Spanish heritage. They occupied an ambiguous and marginalized position within Spanish society.
During the fifteenth century in Spain, the term "Moriscos" referred to individuals who were descendants of Muslims (Moors) and Christians. This period marked the Reconquista, a long process of Christian reconquest of the Iberian Peninsula. As Christian forces gained control over former Muslim territories, the Muslim population faced increasing pressure to convert to Christianity.
The Moriscos found themselves in a complex and uncertain position within Spanish society. They were officially considered to be Christians, having converted from Islam, but their mixed heritage and cultural practices set them apart from the mainstream Christian population. This often resulted in marginalization and discrimination.
The Moriscos faced various restrictions on their religious and cultural practices, including prohibitions on speaking Arabic and practicing Islamic rituals. They were subjected to surveillance and scrutiny from both religious authorities and the general population. The Spanish crown attempted to assimilate the Moriscos into mainstream Christian society, but the process was met with resistance and resentment.
Overall, the Moriscos in fifteenth-century Spain represented a distinct group with roots in both Moorish and Spanish heritage. Their position in society was marked by marginalization and cultural suppression as Spain underwent significant religious and social transformations during the Reconquista.
To learn more about Moriscos Click Here: brainly.com/question/14033448
#SPJ11
briefly explain one specific historical effect of either the korean war or the vietnam war on united states society.
One specific historical effect of the Vietnam War on United States society was the erosion of public trust in the government and a rise in anti-war sentiment and activism.
The Vietnam War had a profound impact on United States society, and one notable effect was the erosion of public trust in the government. The war was marked by controversial decisions, such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the Pentagon Papers revelations, which revealed government deception and misinformation. These events, coupled with the high number of casualties and the prolonged nature of the conflict, led to widespread disillusionment among the American public. As a result, anti-war sentiment grew, and protests against the war intensified. The Vietnam War played a significant role in shaping the social and political landscape of the United States, fueling a wave of activism and distrust in government institutions.
To learn more about pentagon papers click here brainly.com/question/31107611
#SPJ11
What factors influenced the peace treaties that ended ww1.
The factors that influenced the peace treaties that ended World War I included geopolitical considerations, national interests, territorial adjustments, and the desire for lasting peace and stability.
The peace treaties, particularly the Treaty of Versailles, were heavily influenced by the major powers involved in the war, namely the Allied Powers (led by France, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and the Central Powers (led by Germany). These powers sought to address various issues such as territorial boundaries, reparations, disarmament, and the establishment of international organizations like the League of Nations.
Geopolitical considerations played a significant role in redrawing the map of Europe and reshaping the balance of power among nations. National interests and the desire to protect their respective territories and populations were key drivers in determining the terms of the treaties. Additionally, the devastation caused by the war and the quest for a lasting peace influenced the negotiations and the subsequent agreements.
Overall, the peace treaties were influenced by a complex interplay of factors, with the aim of resolving the conflict, preventing future wars, and establishing a new world order after the devastation of World War I.
You can learn more about World War I at
https://brainly.com/question/446364
#SPJ11
Andrew Jackson's background differed from previous American presidents for which of the following reasons?
A. His childhood taught him the importance of racial equality.
B. He never served in the military.
C. He briefly fought for the British during the Revolutionary War.
D. He grew up very poor.
Andrew Jackson's background differed from previous American presidents primarily because he grew up very poor. Unlike his predecessors, Jackson came from a humble background, which shaped his perspective and influenced his policies as president.
Option D is the correct choice. Andrew Jackson's impoverished upbringing set him apart from previous American presidents. Born into a poor family on the frontier of the Carolinas, Jackson faced economic hardships and a lack of formal education. This upbringing had a profound impact on his worldview and political ideology. Jackson identified with the common man and believed in the importance of protecting the interests of the working class. His experiences as a self-made man shaped his policies, such as his opposition to the Second Bank of the United States, which he viewed as favoring the wealthy elite. Additionally, Jackson's background contributed to his support for westward expansion and the acquisition of Native American lands. His presidency marked a shift toward a more populist and egalitarian style of leadership, reflecting his own background and the values he held dear.
To learn more about frontier click here brainly.com/question/30285088
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements describes how the crisis in Berlin in 1948–1949 was concluded?
Answer:
The blockadee blockade was lifted, and Berlin remained divided.
Explanation:
Briefly explain one development from the period of 1945 to 1990 that could be used to challenge the point of view you identified in part a.
One development from the period of 1945 to 1990 that could challenge the point of view identified in part a, which focused on the significance of the Civil War, is the Civil Rights Movement in the United States.
One development from the period of 1945 to 1990 that could challenge the point of view identified in part a, which focused on the significance of the Civil War, is the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. The Civil Rights Movement, particularly in the 1950s and 1960s, was a powerful social and political movement aimed at achieving racial equality and ending segregation. It challenged the notion that the issues of the Civil War, such as racial inequality and discrimination, had been fully resolved. The movement brought attention to ongoing racial disparities and the need for further progress in achieving civil rights for all citizens.
Learn more about the Civil Rights Movement here:
https://brainly.com/question/24078961
#SPJ11
Cicely Veronica Wedgwood, British historian, The Thirty Years War, originally published in 1938, excerpt from the revised introduction published as part of the 1956 reprint
"I wrote this book in the [1930s], against the background of depression at home and mounting tension abroad. The preoccupations of that unhappy time cast their shadows over its pages. I wrote with the knowledge, sometimes intimate, sometimes more distant, of conditions in depressed and derelict areas, of the sufferings of the unwanted and uprooted—the two million unemployed at home, the Jewish and liberal fugitives from Germany.... Admittedly, the atmosphere of the [1930s] had something to do with my choice of subject as well as with my methods of treatment. Many of my generation who grew up under the shadow of the First World War had a sincere, if mistaken, conviction that all wars were unnecessary and useless. I no longer think that all wars are unnecessary; but some are, and I still think that the Thirty Years War was one of these. It need not have happened and it settled nothing worth settling."
Cicely Veronica Wedgwood, British historian, The Thirty Years War, originally published in 1938, excerpt from the revised introduction published as part of the 1956 reprint
Which of the following best explains why, in the 1956 edition of the book, the author stated, "I no longer think that all wars are unnecessary"?
The Second World War opened up new economic and social opportunities for women.
The Second World War opened up Europe to increased American cultural and economic influence.
The Second World War led more writers to question literary conventions and bourgeois social values.
The Second World War had to be fought to stop the expansion of Nazi Germany in Europe.
The following best explains why, in the 1956 edition of the book, the author stated, "I no longer think that all wars are unnecessary": The Second World War had to be fought to stop the expansion of Nazi Germany in Europe.
Why was it necessary to fight the Second World War?The statement indicates a change in the author's perspective regarding the necessity of wars. The Second World War, which occurred between 1939 and 1945, was a global conflict primarily fought against Nazi Germany, Italy, and Japan. It was a war of immense scale and impact, with significant geopolitical consequences.
The experience of witnessing the rise of Nazi Germany and the atrocities committed by the regime may have influenced the author's revised view on the necessity of wars. The author acknowledges that while they once believed all wars were unnecessary, the Second World War changed their perspective. The war, in this context, can be seen as a justifiable response to the expansionist ambitions and threat posed by Nazi Germany, which required military intervention to prevent further aggression and preserve peace in Europe.
To learn more about Nazi, visit
brainly.com/question/31942611
#SPJ11
How significant was the role of former slaves in ending the Slave Trade?
Answer:
he role of former slaves in ending the transatlantic Slave Trade was significant and cannot be understated. While the efforts of various groups and individuals were instrumental in bringing about the abolition of the Slave Trade, the voices and actions of former slaves played a crucial role in raising awareness, shaping public opinion, and advocating for the abolitionist cause. Here are some key aspects highlighting their significance:
First-hand Testimony: Former slaves who had experienced the horrors and brutality of slavery firsthand provided compelling testimonies that exposed the inhumane nature of the Slave Trade. Their narratives, published in newspapers, books, and pamphlets, offered vivid accounts of the atrocities inflicted upon enslaved individuals, which helped sway public opinion against slavery and the Slave Trade.
Activism and Advocacy: Former slaves actively participated in abolitionist movements, both individually and collectively. They formed organizations, such as the Anti-Slavery Society of Canada or the African Aid Society, and became influential abolitionist speakers, writers, and activists. Their speeches, writings, and public engagements helped galvanize support for the abolitionist cause and pressured governments to take action.
Underground Railroad: Former slaves played a pivotal role in the operation of the Underground Railroad, a network of secret routes and safe houses that facilitated the escape of enslaved individuals to free states and Canada. They risked their lives to guide and assist fellow slaves on their journey to freedom, contributing to the growing resistance against slavery and the Slave Trade.
International Impact: Former slaves who escaped or were freed became powerful advocates on the international stage. They traveled to Europe and other parts of the world, sharing their stories and experiences, and contributing to the growing global condemnation of the Slave Trade. Their efforts helped mobilize international pressure on nations engaged in the Slave Trade and ultimately led to its abolition.
Symbolic Importance: The mere existence of former slaves who had successfully escaped or gained their freedom served as a powerful symbol of resistance and hope. Their personal stories of liberation and resilience inspired others to take action, fostering a growing sentiment against slavery and the Slave Trade.
Explanation:
explain three reasons/factors that impacted why the u.s. intervene in cuba in the late 19th century?
The United States intervened in Cuba in the late 19th century due to economic interests, fueled by its sugar industry, the influence of yellow journalism and public opinion, and geopolitical considerations related to securing its strategic position in the Caribbean and protecting American trade routes.
Economic Interests: The United States had substantial economic interests in Cuba, primarily driven by its sugar industry. American businessmen had invested heavily in Cuban sugar plantations, and Cuba had become a major supplier of sugar to the United States. When Cuba's struggle for independence from Spain threatened these economic interests, the U.S. government became concerned about the potential disruption to its trade and investments, prompting intervention to protect American economic interests.
Yellow Journalism and Public Opinion: The emergence of yellow journalism played a crucial role in shaping public opinion and generating support for U.S. intervention in Cuba. Sensationalized newspaper reports portrayed the Spanish rule in Cuba as oppressive and highlighted stories of Spanish atrocities against Cuban rebels. This propaganda fueled public outrage and sympathy for the Cuban cause, placing pressure on the U.S. government to intervene in the name of humanitarianism and support for self-determination.
Geopolitical Considerations: The United States also had geopolitical motives for intervening in Cuba. Strategically located in the Caribbean, Cuba held significant importance in terms of U.S. security and trade routes. The U.S. government was concerned about potential European colonization or influence in Cuba, which could pose a threat to American interests. To safeguard its own regional dominance and maintain control over vital trade routes, the United States sought to assert its influence in Cuba through military intervention.
To learn more about economic interests
https://brainly.com/question/29757823
#SPJ4
Indentured servitude was opposed by the ruling elite who condemned forced labor as incompatible with the values of the colonial leaders. Group of answer choices
False
Only in the Northern colonies
Only in the Southern colonies
True
Indentured servitude was opposed by the ruling elite who condemned forced labor as incompatible with the values of the colonial leaders. The statement is False.
The statement is false. Indentured servitude, which involved individuals agreeing to work for a specific period in exchange for passage to the colonies or other benefits, was not universally opposed by the ruling elite in the American colonies. In fact, indentured servitude was widely practiced and accepted, particularly in the Southern colonies.
Indentured servitude was an integral part of the labor system in the early colonial period. The ruling elite, including colonial leaders and plantation owners, relied heavily on indentured servants for agricultural labor and other forms of work. The system allowed them to acquire labor at a relatively low cost and helped meet the growing demand for labor in the expanding colonies.
It is important to note that while indentured servitude was not universally condemned by the ruling elite, it did face criticism and opposition in certain contexts. Over time, concerns about abuses and exploitation within the system led to the rise of anti-indenture sentiments and the eventual transition to other forms of labor, such as African slavery, which further divided the colonies in terms of labor practices.
Learn more about colonial leaders here:
https://brainly.com/question/29466808
#SPJ11
6. Define the scientific method.
Answer:
a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
Explanation:
hi
Which region of the Global South has countries that are characterized by features of neocolonialism?
A) Middle East and North Africa
B) sub-Saharan Africa
C) Latin America
D) South Asia and Central Asia
The region of the Global South that has countries characterized by features of neocolonialism is C) Latin America.
Which region has countries characterized by neocolonialism?Neocolonialism refers to the continuation of economic, political, and cultural dominance by former colonial powers or other external forces in post-colonial countries. In Latin America, historical patterns of colonization and economic exploitation have left a lasting impact on the region.
Many Latin American countries have experienced foreign interventions, economic dependency, and unequal power dynamics with external actors. This includes factors such as multinational corporations exploiting natural resources, unequal trade relations, and the influence of foreign policies that prioritize the interests of dominant nations.
Additionally, Latin America has witnessed interventions and regime changes supported by external powers, which have often served their own geopolitical and economic interests.
To learn more about Latin America, visit
brainly.com/question/30608091
#SPJ11
in the first part of the nineteenth century the middle-class valued all of these traits..
In the first part of the nineteenth century, the middle-class valued several traits that were associated with their social status and aspirations.
These traits included:Hard work and industry: The middle-class placed great emphasis on diligence, productivity, and personal ambition. They believed in the value of hard work as a means of social and economic advancement.Morality and respectability: Middle-class individuals aspired to maintain a high level of moral conduct and uphold respectable behavior. They believed in adhering to social norms, proper etiquette, and maintaining a good reputation within their communities.
Education and self-improvement: The middle-class placed a strong emphasis on education and self-improvement. They valued intellectual pursuits, sought educational opportunities for themselves and their children, and viewed education as a means of upward mobility.Financial prudence and thrift: Middle-class individuals valued financial stability and prudence. They practiced thrift and careful money management to ensure their economic well-being and maintain their social standing. Social order and stability: The middle-class favored social order, stability, and respect for authority. They valued law and order, social hierarchies, and saw themselves as upholders of societal norms.
These traits reflected the aspirations and values of the rising middle-class during the early nineteenth century, as they sought to distinguish themselves from the working class and secure their position within society.
To learn more about middle-class click here:
brainly.com/question/11318862
#SPJ11
During American Imperialism
What were the major arguments in favor of continuing the policy of isolation?
The major arguments in favor of continuing the policy of isolation during American Imperialism were maintaining national security, avoiding entangling alliances, and preserving domestic resources and interests.
During American Imperialism, there were several major arguments in favor of continuing the policy of isolation.
Firstly, proponents of isolationism argued for maintaining national security. They believed that involvement in foreign affairs and imperialistic ventures would increase the risk of conflicts and entangle the United States in unnecessary wars. By staying out of international affairs, they believed the country could focus on strengthening its own defenses and protecting its citizens.
Secondly, advocates of isolationism emphasized the importance of avoiding entangling alliances. They believed that alliances and commitments to other nations could lead to compromising America's sovereignty and independence. By avoiding such alliances, they aimed to preserve the country's ability to act in its own best interests without being unduly influenced by the interests of other nations.
Lastly, supporters of isolationism argued for preserving domestic resources and interests. They believed that focusing on internal development and economic growth would benefit the nation more than acquiring overseas territories. They saw the vast resources and potential for economic expansion within the United States itself, making it unnecessary to seek imperialistic ventures abroad.
These arguments collectively aimed to maintain American autonomy, protect national security, and prioritize domestic interests over global entanglements during the era of American Imperialism.
For more such question on Imperialism
https://brainly.com/question/377688
#SPJ11
what capital is located at 64 north latitude and 21 west longitude
Answer:
reykjavik, iceland
Explanation:
the kingdom of ____, located south of the sahara, continues a sacred dynasty of rulers to this day.KushEgyptBeninMaliBerber
The kingdom of Kush, located south of the sahara, continues a sacred dynasty of rulers to this day. The correct option is kush.
It was a prominent kingdom that was located in the Nubian region, which is present-day Sudan. The Kush kingdom continued a sacred dynasty of rulers to this day, and it is well known for its rich cultural heritage, architecture, and art. The Kingdom of Kush was famous for its gold, which was a significant source of wealth, and it was an essential trading partner for the ancient Egyptians.
The kingdom of Kush played a crucial role in the development of African civilization, and it influenced the culture and traditions of neighboring kingdoms such as Egypt. The Kush dynasty was founded in the 8th century BC and continued until the 4th century AD. Despite the challenges faced by the kingdom, including invasions and internal conflicts, it remained a prominent power in the region. Today, the legacy of the Kush kingdom is still celebrated, and it continues to inspire African people and scholars worldwide. The correct option is kush.
For more about dynasty:
https://brainly.com/question/2950887
#SPJ11
please help on a timer
What myth is likely partially responsible for Western culture’s disdain toward reptiles?
Noah’s Ark
Garden of Eden
Ragnarök
Armageddon
The Garden of Eden myth is likely partially responsible for Western culture's disdain toward reptiles. According to the biblical story, in the Garden of Eden, a serpent tempts Eve to eat the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Knowledge.
This act is seen as the origin of humanity's fall from grace and the introduction of sin into the world. The serpent, traditionally depicted as a reptile, is associated with deception, evil, and temptation in this narrative.
The negative portrayal of the serpent in the Garden of Eden has influenced Western cultural attitudes toward reptiles. It has contributed to a perception of reptiles as symbols of deceit, danger, and untrustworthiness.
This association has been ingrained in various cultural and religious traditions, shaping attitudes and beliefs about reptiles that persist to some extent in Western societies.
It is important to note that while this myth has influenced cultural perceptions, individual attitudes toward reptiles can vary widely. Additionally, scientific understanding and appreciation of reptiles have evolved over time, leading to a more nuanced and informed perspective.
To know more about the Garden of Eden:
https://brainly.com/question/30705391
#SPJ1
Which conservative principle did many feel Gorge H.W. Bush broke when he agreed to raise taxes in 1990?
Answer:
the principle of " no new taxes "
Assay about the impact of pseudoscience ideas of race on the Jewish nation during the period 1933 to 1946
Pseudoscientific ideas of race during 1933-1946 had a devastating impact on the Jewish nation, fueling anti-Semitism and enabling the Holocaust.
During the period of 1933 to 1946, the impact of pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation was profound and devastating.
Nazi Germany propagated false notions of racial superiority and anti-Semitic theories that were based on pseudoscience.
These ideas labeled Jews as a "racial enemy" and dehumanized them.
Pseudoscientific concepts like eugenics and Social Darwinism were used to justify discrimination, persecution, and ultimately, the Holocaust.
Jews were targeted for extermination based on their perceived racial inferiority, as propagated by Nazi ideology.
These pseudoscientific ideas of race fueled widespread anti-Semitism, leading to the systemic persecution, imprisonment, and mass murder of millions of Jews.
The impact on the Jewish nation was catastrophic, with families torn apart, communities destroyed, and a significant loss of life and cultural heritage.
It is crucial to recognize the danger of pseudoscience and how it can be manipulated to justify oppression and genocide.
The period of 1933 to 1946 serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences that such false and hateful ideas can have on a targeted group of people.
For more such questions on Pseudoscientific ideas:
https://brainly.com/question/32300794
#SPJ11