The claim that George Washington wanted the powers of a king is an opinion and not a fact.
What is the difference between opinion and fact?A fact is something confirmed through research and data.An opinion is a thought established through personal interpretations that do not evaluate data and research.When the speaker claims that George Washington wanted the powers of a king, he does not present any data, research, or information to support this claim.
Therefore, it is not possible to say that this is a fact, because there is no concrete evidence about it.
However, the speaker can claim that this information is based on his opinion which is created through his interpretation of who Washington was and the way he worked.
Learn more about what an opinion is:
https://brainly.com/question/6828132?
#SPJ1
Which of these had the BIGGEST influence on speeding the transportation of goods and people in the early decades of the 1800s
Steamboats had the most influence on how rapidly goods and people were carried in the early 1800s. utilized extensively on the major rivers in the US and predated locomotives by a few decades.
What are Steamboats ?Shallow-draft paddle wheel steamboats were frequently used on rivers in the 19th century, especially the Mississippi River and its significant tributaries in the United States. Any steam-powered boat, but particularly a shallow-draft paddle wheel riverboat, is referred to as a steamboat.
The steamboat industry got its start in America in 1787 when John Fitch tested a steamboat there. Robert Fulton conducted successful tests after that, but it wasn't until 1811 that the New Orleans, a ship built in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania for Fulton and Robert R. Livingston, was specifically designed to cross the lower Mississippi River. The two men began operating a regular riverboat service between New Orleans and Natchez in 1812.
To know more about Steamboat, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8791849
#SPJ1
What were the top 5 causes of death in 1900?
Answer: heart disease, stroke, kidney disease, accidents, cancer,
Explanation:
Synthesize the different ways that Middle Eastern countries decide
public policy. Which country does this most effectively in your
opinion? Write 2-3 well-written paragraphs.
Answer:
Explanation:
Public policy in Middle Eastern countries is often influenced by a variety of factors, including religious and cultural traditions, economic and political considerations, and international relationships. The specific mechanisms for making policy decisions can also vary widely between different countries in the region.
In some countries, public policy is primarily decided by the government, with input from advisory bodies such as councils or legislative bodies. In other countries, religious leaders or tribal leaders may also play a significant role in shaping policy decisions. In some countries, there is a strong emphasis on consensus and consultation with a wide range of stakeholders, while in other countries, policy decisions may be made more centrally and with less participation from citizens or civil society.
It is difficult to say which country does this most effectively, as it can depend on the specific policy area and the goals of the country. However some countries like UAE, Israel, and Oman are noted for their ability to effectively implement policies in various sectors of their economies, such as energy, infrastructure, and technology. UAE, for example, has made significant investments in renewable energy and has taken steps to diversify its economy, in order to reduce its dependence on oil. These steps have helped the country to achieve strong economic growth, while also addressing long-term sustainability concerns.
In my opinion, effective public policy making in the Middle East will depend on a number of factors, including a country's political system, the level of citizen participation, the role of religious and cultural traditions, and the nature of the country's relationships with other nations. These factors can vary widely between different countries in the region and within a country, making a comparison across countries more complex.
Explain constitutionalism in contrast to Absolutism.
Explanation:
Absolutism limits the freedom of the masses by excessive surveillance and censorship while Constitutionalism is responsible for ensuring freedom and liberty of people in the state.
What two places were known for having decentralized/feudal governments during the 600 to 1450 time period?
During the 600 to 1450 time period, two places that were known for having decentralized/feudal governments were Europe and Japan.
In Europe, the feudal system was a political, economic and social system that was based on the exchange of land for military service and loyalty. This system allowed lords to control the land and the people who lived on it, and in return, the lords provided military protection for the king. This decentralized government led to the rise of powerful lords and dukes who controlled large territories and had their own armies.
In Japan, the government was also decentralized during this time period, with local lords and warlords known as daimyos controlling large territories and having their own armies. The emperor was considered the symbolic leader but held little actual power, while the shogun, a military leader appointed by the emperor, held the real power and controlled the country. This system was known as the shogunate, and it was a decentralized form of government.
To know more about feudal governments click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/12523432#
#SPJ4
How was the computer built by the us able to help the war effort brainly?
During the US war, computers performed the intricate calculations required to construct the atomic bomb.
Explain the role of computer during war in US?Battle strategies are short-term decisions and tactics used to direct army movements and the use of weapons on the battlefield.
The United States constructed a computer that performed intricate calculations that plotted military strategy in order to aid and better their war effort. These computers were employed by the military to manage missiles as well as other weapons through radar communications. They are also employed in the planning of missions. They are also employed for assault planning and were crucial in operating the enormous weaponry devices.Thus, it has been argued by some historians that radar contributed more to the Allies' victory in the war than any other technological advancement, including the atomic bomb, did.
To know more about the role of computer during war in US, here
https://brainly.com/question/1188732
#SPJ4
Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy all worked hard to promote human rights __________. but the media inflamed the anti-equality mindset and enforced the
Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy all worked hard to promote human rights but the media inflamed the anti-equality mindset.
Human rights are fundamental rights that everyone has, regardless of race, gender, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or other status. Human rights include, among other things, the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more.
Human rights are moral concepts or norms governing specific standards of human behavior that are routinely protected by local and international law. They are usually regarded as inalienable, fundamental rights "to which a person is essentially entitled simply because she or he is a human being" and "inherent in all human beings," regardless of age, ethnic origin, geography, language, religion, ethnicity, or any other position. They are universal in the sense that they apply everywhere and at all times, and they are egalitarian in the sense that they are the same for everyone.
To learn more about human rights, here
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ4
4. List three ways by which knowledge of mainland culture came to Japan.
i really need help whit this giving alot of points
Answer:
Explanation:
• Japanese who traveled to China
•Through gifts sent from the mainland to Japan
• From Korean workers who settled in Japan
Why are historians lucky that early humans left trash behind?
Historians are lucky that early humans left trash behind because it provides valuable insight into the lifestyles, customs, and technologies of past cultures.
What is humans left trash?Humans leaving trash is an issue that has been around since ancient times. It is a problem that affects the environment and can have long-term consequences on our planet. Trash can come in many forms, from plastic bottles to discarded electronics and other waste products. Leaving trash in public spaces, or disposing of it improperly, can cause air and water pollution, harm wildlife, and create a negative visual impact. It can also create health risks from diseases, pests, and hazardous materials.
Trash, such as broken tools, discarded food, and other items, often reveals information about the people who left it behind, and can help us better understand how people lived in the past.
To learn more about left trash visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14049620
#SPJ1
Why did Japanese workers move from Japan to Hawaii and California?
Immigration' claims that Hawaii had improved racial relations, such as those made by Chinese immigrants, were the main factors in this.
The Japanese relocated to California for what reason?In the middle of the 1880s, when the Japanese government first permitted emigration, Japanese immigration to California started to increase significantly. Employers supported Japanese immigration to fill the void left by the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 because there was a shortage of inexpensive Asian labor in Asia.
The Japanese migrated to America for what reason?In quest of stability and prosperity, Japanese immigrants set out for the United States, fleeing an uncertain home country in exchange for a life of arduous labor and the possibility to give their offspring a brighter future.
To know more about Japanese migration visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29367865
#SPJ4
explain one way in which the historical situation of the late 19th century might have affected the vision of Africa, future outline by the author in the third paragraph
Answer:
The answers for the following question according to the passage is:
The civilization ideology
The scramble for Africa
The survival of the
The repeated reference to Uncas as "the last of the Mohicans" alludes to Indian culture's demise at the hands of expanding European civilization. The title foreshadows the novel plot's final tragedy.
The explanation for the following answers is:
Her children are going to perform. The imperial argument for 'civilizing' a backward continent is demonstrated in this great effort.
The race for Africa is a contest between European countries to colonize the African continent. The British dream of imperial hegemony in Africa was smashed as a result of this.
The colonization of Africa by European powers resulted in just this, with the weak (black) people being consumed by the powerful (white).
For more information about "the last of the Mohicans" refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/21034152
The display shows which type of television show families watched on a Thursday evening. Circle graph with five pieces: sport piece is labeled 34%, reality TV is labeled 26%, drama is labeled 12%, news is labeled 16%, and cartoons is labeled 12%. Which of the following describes the data set? Categorical and bivariate Categorical and univariate Numerical and bivariate Numerical and univariate
A pie chart, often known as a circle chart, is a visual representation of the various values of a specific variable or a means to summarize a set of nominal data.
What is a pie chart?A circular statistical visual with slices illustrating numerical proportion is called a pie chart. Each slice's arc length in a pie chart corresponds to the quantity it represents.
Although it was given that name because it resembles a slice of pie, there are other ways to serve it. The Statistical Breviary by William Playfair, published in 1801, is largely credited with creating the first known pie chart.
In the business sector and in the media, pie charts are used a lot. They have been criticized, though, and many experts advise staying away from them because studies have shown that it can be challenging to compare data from one pie chart to another or between different pie charts.
Learn more about pie chart, here
https://brainly.com/question/9979761
#SPJ1
Answer:
CATEGORIAL AND BIAVRIATE!!!!!
Explanation:
The other answer does not answer the question, i hope this helps yall!! (also sorry if i spelt the answer wrong im not that great of a speller but you know what i mean)
Why did Europe initially get involved in the slave trade in west africa
it served as an outlet for prisoners
it was a way to make their colonies more profitable
it supported their desire to explore the americas
it was something they were forced to do
The Mayan civilizationa.lasted about 1,000 years.b.hit its peak about A.D. 750.c.was defeated by the Aztecs.d.came to a mysterious end.
The Mayan civilization D. Reached a mysterious end. The Mayan development endured longer than 1,000 years and hit its top between 250 A.D. and what's more, 900 A.D.
Early Mayan culture showed the impact of the previous Olmec human advancement. The ascent of the Maya started around 250 ce, and what is referred to by archeologists as the Exemplary Time of Mayan culture went on until around 900 ce.
The Maya are likely the most popular of the traditional civilizations of Mesoamerica. Starting in the Yucatán around 2600 B.C., they rose to unmistakable quality around A.D. 250 in present-day southern Mexico, Guatemala, northern Belize, and western Honduras.
Hence option (D) is correct.
Learn more about Mayan civilization:
https://brainly.com/question/10792814
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
The Mayan civilization
a. lasted about 1,000 years.
b. hit its peak about A.D. 750.
c. was defeated by the Aztecs.
d. came to a mysterious end.
How does the Enlightenment continue the revolutions begun by the Renaissance and the Protestant Reformation?
The way that the Enlightenment continue the revolutions begun by the Renaissance and the Protestant Reformation is that:
One of the key ways in which the Enlightenment continued the revolutions begun by the Renaissance and the Protestant Reformation was by promoting the idea of individual freedom and autonomy. The Renaissance had emphasized the individual and their potential, while the Protestant Reformation had challenged the authority of the Catholic Church
What is the Enlightenment period about?The Enlightenment, also known as the Age of Reason, was a cultural and intellectual movement that emerged in the late 17th and 18th centuries. It built on the ideas of the Renaissance and the Protestant Reformation, and emphasized reason, individualism, and skepticism.
The Enlightenment thinkers believed in the power of human reason to understand and improve the world, and they sought to apply reason to all aspects of life, including science, politics, religion, and philosophy.
Therefore, Enlightenment took these ideas even further, promoting the idea that individuals should be free to think and express themselves as they saw fit, without interference from religious or political authorities.
Learn more about Enlightenment from
https://brainly.com/question/12481854
#SPJ1
How did Congress ensure that the United States would have enough troops to serve in World war I?
On May 18, 1917, Wilson signed into law the Selective Service Act, which Congress had passed. A registration for military service was mandated by the statute for all American men between the ages of 21 and 30.
What is the mandate of the Selective Service Act?The Selective Service Act of 1917, often known as the Selective Draft Act, granted the United States federal government the right to enlist conscripts to help build a national army during World War I. Nearly all males living in the United States between the ages of 18 and 25 who are citizens or legal residents are obliged to register with Selective Service. 30 days after turning 18, citizens must register. Within 30 days after their arrival in the U.S., immigrants must register.
To know more about Selective Service Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11596367
#SPJ4
What event led to the Executive Order 9066?
The Executive Order 9066 was approved by the then-U.S. government after the pearl harbor bombing by the Japanese.
The Executive Order 9066 was an executive order issued by then-U.S. President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, which endowed the secretary of war and his commanders with the power “to prescribe military areas in such places and of such extent as he or the appropriate Military Commander may determine, from which any or all persons may be excluded.”
It wasn't exclusively mentioned that Japan was to be the target but it was Japan that was quickly made the recipient of the retaliation by the U.S.
Learn more about the Pearl Harbor on
https://brainly.com/question/1733737?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
help me please i dont know
Answer: Your answer is A
Explanation: Slaves only purpose was to work they were not considered towns people
Which founding father worked to establish a separation between church and government by drafting the Virginia Bill of Establishing Religious Freedom?
Patrick Henry
Thomas Jefferson
George Washington
John Adams
Which action of President Nixon during the Watergate Scandal caused a constitutional crisis? A He claimed executive privilege. B He claimed his large election mandate justified his actions. C He refused to comply with the special prosecutor and instead fired him. D He answered all questions with "no comment."
Giving prosecutors access to hidden recordings of oval Office conversations is option B.
He didn't want to turn in the tapes of the private discussions that are secretly taped in the oval office for security reasons. When he finally turned them in, several of the recordings' segments were quiet or scrambled, making it impossible to understand what he had to say. He finally submitted his resignation, and the succeeding President later absolved him of his wrongdoing. The 37th president of the United States of America was Richard Nixon. From 1969 to 1974, he presided over the country. Before being elected as president, Nixon served as the US's 36th vice president. America was defeated for the first time in history during the Vietnam War, which Nixon is credited with ending. Nixon made a pledge to his constituents that if elected president, he would put an end to the conflict, and he did it while withdrawing from Vietnam.
Learn more about Richard Nixon here:
https://brainly.com/question/1286020
#SPJ4
what did france lose as a result of the french and indian war?
As a result of the French and Indian War, France lost all of its territories in North America, including New France (present-day Canada) and its territories in the present-day United States (including Louisiana, Mississippi, and Illinois). The war also marked the end of France's military and economic power in the region, and it was forced to cede these territories to Great Britain and Spain as part of the Treaty of Paris in 1763.
Answer:
The British received Canada from France and Florida from Spain
Explanation:
1. Why is the Patriot Act controversial?
A. Many Americans feel that it violates constitutional rights to privacy for the sake of security.
B. The act was written and pushed through Congress at a time when President Bush was unpopular.
C. Many Americans thought the Patriot Act didn't go far enough in making private correspondence public.
D. Terrorist attacks actually increased in the United States after the passage of the Patriot Act.
A. Many Americans feel that it violates constitutional rights to privacy for the sake of security.
Some believe the Patriot Act weakened privacy rights by allowing the government access without a probable cause
Jesus describes his followers as “the salt of the earth”. Is this a good or bad thing? How can you tell?
Answer:
It could be good or bad, but i would say bad
Explanation:
salt soaks up water. referring to humans, people soak up/take things from earth even if they don't need it.
ince destructive conflicts are often set off by struggles over perceived power, and
given that power is relational, power always is in a state of change. The only question is
how one goes about changing power. If you struggle with someone because "you won't
give in," you are trying to block their exercise of power-and they are probably doing the
same thing. The paradox is th at the more you struggle against someone, the less power you
will have with that person. From a both/and perspective, the more powerful we feel, the
more we are setting ourselves up for resistance from the other party. Put bluntly, power
against is usually eventually blocked and dimin ished. Boulding (1989) says it well: "Power
over human beings is very complex. Other human beings can answer back, fight back,
obey or disobey, argue and try to exercise power over us, wh ich a tree never does" (53).
We must recognize th at while we need to exercise appropriate power and influence, the
other person needs to exercise influence as well, so we might as well cooperate with each
other so we can both be effective. The both/and perspective assumes that you all want to
accomplish your goals and that you need each other to do th at. Since it is the other who
is blocking you (and you blocking him or her), integrative power moves beyond the tugof-
war and to a new plane of relationship.
This statement is suggesting that power struggles can be destructive and that a more effective approach is to recognize that power is relational and constantly changing.
The author argues that trying to block someone else's exercise of power can lead to resistance and ultimately decrease one's own power. Instead, the author suggests an approach of cooperation, recognizing that both parties need to exercise appropriate power and influence to achieve their goals. This approach, referred to as the "both/and perspective," assumes that both parties have common goals and that they need each other to achieve them. It moves beyond the tug-of-war of traditional power struggles to a new level of relationship.
Learn more about power dynamics and conflicts in relationships here: https://brainly.com/question/14264875
#SPJ4
Plss Help, i will give 30 points.
The Boston Massacre 1770
1. List all acts passed against the Colonists by 1770
2. What had been taking place in Boston since 1764?
-What was the purpose of this invasion?
- What affects did this cause between Colonists and the Red Coats?
3. How did the entire event begin? Who do you think was in the right? Explain your thoughts?
4. How did this interaction between the Red Coat and the Colonist lead to the problem becoming a bigger more violent one?
5. How were the Colonists showing the RedCoats their hatred of them?
6. What was the reaction of the RedCoats towards these Colonists?
7. What happened to the RedCoats after the Massacre? Do you think this was a fair outcome? Explain why or why not.
The Sugar Act of 1764, Stamp Act of 1765, and Townshend Acts of 1767 were enacted against Colonists by 1770.
This legislation and other British initiatives to strengthen its control over the Colonies have increased tension and unrest in Boston since 1764.On the evening of March 5, 1770, a number of Colonists gathered behind a Boston guardhouse and taunted and threw items at a group of British troops, starting the Boston Massacre.Due to their mutual hostility, the Red Coats and Colonists' fight evolved into a more violent conflict.The Colonists protested and boycotted British products and verbally and physically assaulted Red Coats.Red Coats regularly attacked Colonists.After the Boston Massacre, seven Red Coats were tried for murder. Two were branded for manslaughter. The trial resulted in Colonies disturbance.What is The Boston Massacre of 1770?The Sugar Act of 1764, the Stamp Act of 1765, and the Townshend Acts of 1767 were among the laws enacted against the colonists by 1770. The use of specially stamped paper for legal documents, periodicals, and other printed items was mandated by these laws, which also levied taxes and tariffs on a variety of commodities.
Due to these acts and other actions made by the British government to impose its power over the Colonies, there has been an increase in tension and instability in Boston since 1764. These actions were used to boost income and exert more authority over the Colonies. Many colonists felt that their rights and liberties were being violated, which led to their dissatisfaction and wrath.
On the evening of March 5, 1770, a number of colonists gathered near a guardhouse in Boston and started insulting and hurling items at a group of British troops. This is when the Boston Massacre officially began. Eventually, the troops opened fire on the throng, killing five Colonists and injuring a number of others.
Due to the intense hostility and tension between the two factions, the argument between the Red Coats and the Colonists became increasingly serious and violent. The Red Coats saw the Colonists as rebellious and rowdy, while the Colonists considered them as emblems of British rule.
The colonists engaged in a multitude of actions to demonstrate their animosity for the Red Coats, including as demonstrations, boycotts of British products, and verbal and physical altercations with the troops.
The Red Coats often acted angrily and violently against the colonists. They saw the colonists as an existential danger to their rule and were prepared to impose their will by violence.
Several Red Coats were accused of murder and placed on trial after the Boston Massacre. Two of them ultimately had their thumbs branded after being convicted guilty of manslaughter. The trial's contentious verdict led to further instability in the Colonies. Whether or whether the result was fair is up for discussion. Some individuals think the Red Coats were acting in self-defense and were unjustly punished, while others think their actions were appropriate and they should have received harsher punishment.
Read more about The Boston Massacre 1770
https://brainly.com/question/13436897
#SPJ1
i need Emilie du chalet opinion for this question please helppp
The term "human nature" refers to the basic tendencies and traits that people are considered to possess naturally, such as our thought, feeling, and behavior patterns. The phrase is frequently used to refer to what it "means" to be a human, the essence of humankind.
How is human nature presented in Lord of the Flies?When people are not constrained by social norms, according to Golding, human nature leads them away from reason and toward savagery. His key claims are that people are brutish by nature and driven by urges to dominate others and act brutally.
The combination of our species' mental, physical, and spiritual traits that make us, well, human, is human nature.
Thus, The term "human nature" refers to the basic tendencies and traits that people are considered to possess naturally,
For more information about human nature presented in Lord of the Flies, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9332740
#SPJ1
q6 Why was the ruling of McCulloch v. Maryland significant?
It established that the courts had the power of judicial review.
It established that Congress had powers to make laws that were "necessary and proper" to carry out its duties.
It established that there would be a separation of church and state.
It established that the U.S. Supreme Court would judge cases in which state and national laws conflict.
The reason why the ruling of McCulloch v. Maryland was significant was B. It established that Congress had powers to make laws that were "necessary and proper" to carry out its duties.
What was the result of the ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland?This ruling upheld the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States, and it established that states do not have the power to tax an agency of the federal government. This decision also established that the courts have the power of judicial review, which means that they have the power to interpret the Constitution and determine the constitutionality of federal laws and state laws.
This principle is one of the key building blocks of the system of checks and balances in the US government and it has been central to many landmark cases in US history.
The McCulloch v. Maryland decision (1819), commonly known as the "Necessary and Appropriate Clause" or the "Elastic Clause," was crucial because it established that Congress had the authority to enact laws that were "necessary and proper" to carry out its obligations.
Find out more on McCulloch v. Maryland at https://brainly.com/question/26383498
#SPJ1
What is the impact the French revolution had on civilization
Which type of warfare was first used in the Battle of the Marne? aerial warfare trench warfare biological warfare nuclear warfare Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Hand-to-hand combat had been essential to infantry warfare. The machine gun, which could eliminate rows upon rows of infantry from a distance on the battlefield, gained popularity during World War I.
Movement over open country became challenging and dangerous due to this weapon, barbed wire, and mines. Trench warfare was therefore established. In order to push the front, the British adopted tanks in 1916 along with artillery and aircraft. The threat to soldiers increased with the development of chemical warfare.
Killing from a distance was also made more efficient by aerial and maritime weaponry. Targets might be hit by ship-mounted guns up to 20 kilometres inland.
To know more about Warfare, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2500921
#SPJ4
What did Japanese internment reveal about American life ?
In 1941, there were about 120,000 people of Japanese descent on the US mainland, mostly along the pacific coast. At the time of the japanese attack on pearl harbor, this occurred. About two-thirds of them had full citizenship and were citizens by birth.
However, in the wake of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Roosevelt administration adopted a severe policy toward these residents, both foreign and native, as a result of a rise in anti-Japanese distrust and terror. The majority of the war was spent in camps for Japanese Americans, who were forced to leave behind their houses and belongings almost universally.
The government defended this policy by arguing national security even though it violated several of the most fundamental constitutional rights of japanese Americans. It is untrue that most Japanese americans lost interest in life after being detained against their will and did relatively little in the camps the internment of japanese people in camps like manzanar in california. franklin D. roosevelt, who was constantly being watched, gave the order to build these internment camps so that the US government could control Japanese americans during world war II.
To know more about Japanese people visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3001130
#SPJ4