Does 8cm 15cm and 17cm form a right triangle?

Answer: 1/12

Step-by-step explanation: the LCD of these two fractions is 12. 5/6 is equal to 10/12, and 3/4 is equal to 9/12. from here, you can find the difference in the numerators over the common denominator and that will be your answer. 10/12-9/12=1/12

The integral evaluates to[tex]∫∫(9x + 12y) daᵣ = ∫∫(9/3)(u + 4v - 4u[/tex]) dudv over the region r.

To evaluate the given integral using the given transformation, we can express the integral in terms of the new variables u and v. The transformation equations are:

x = (1/3)(u + v)

y = (1/3)(v - 2u)

We need to calculate the integral (9x + 12y) da over the parallelogram region r.

First, we need to find the limits of integration in terms of u and v. The vertices of the parallelogram are (-1, 2), (1, -2), (4, 1), and (2, 5). Converting these points to u and v coordinates using the transformation equations, we get:

(-1, 2) -> (1/3, 2/3)

(1, -2) -> (1, -2)

(4, 1) -> (5/3, 1)

(2, 5) -> (1, 3)

The limits of integration for u are 1/3 to 5/3, and for v, it's 2/3 to 3.

Now, we can substitute the transformation equations into the integrand:

9x + 12y = 9[(1/3)(u + v)] + 12[(1/3)(v - 2u)]

= 3u + 3v + 4v - 8u

= -5u + 7v

Finally, we can rewrite the integral in terms of u and v

∫∫r (9x + 12y) da = ∫(1/3 to 5/3) ∫(2/3 to 3) (-5u + 7v) dv du

To evaluate this double integral, we integrate first with respect to v from 2/3 to 3, and then with respect to u from 1/3 to 5/3. The resulting integral will provide the answer to the problem.

Learn more about integral

brainly.com/question/31744185

#SPJ11

Both [tex]det(s^(-1)as) and det(sas^(-1))[/tex]are equal to 3.

To compute [tex]det(s^(-1)as) and det(sas^(-1))[/tex], we can utilize the following properties and theorems:

The determinant of a product of matrices is equal to the product of their determinants: det(AB) = det(A) * det(B).

The determinant of the inverse of a matrix is the inverse of the determinant of the original matrix: [tex]det(A^(-1)) = 1 / det(A)[/tex].

Using these properties, let's compute the determinants:

[tex]det(s^(-1)as)[/tex]:

Applying property 1, we have [tex]det(s^(-1)as) = det(s^(-1)) * det(a) * det(s).[/tex]

Since s is invertible, its determinant det(s) is nonzero, and using property 2, we have [tex]det(s^(-1)) = 1 / det(s)[/tex].

Combining these results, we get:

[tex]det(s^(-1)as) = (1 / det(s)) * det(a) * det(s) = (1 / det(s)) * det(s) * det(a) = det(a) = 3.[/tex]

det(sas^(-1)):

Again, applying property 1, we have [tex]det(sas^(-1)) = det(s) * det(a) * det(s^(-1)).[/tex]

Using property 2, [tex]det(s^(-1)) = 1 / det(s)[/tex], we can rewrite the expression as:

[tex]det(sas^(-1)) = det(s) * det(a) * (1 / det(s)) = det(a) = 3.[/tex]

Therefore, both [tex]det(s^(-1)as) and det(sas^(-1))[/tex]are equal to 3.

To know more about theorems refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/30066983

#SPJ11

Answer:

answer C!!

Step-by-step explanation:

Given  : sphere with radius 15.To find : Which expression gives the volume.Solution : We have given that radius of sphere = 15 units.Volume of sphere =  .Plugging the value of radius Volume of sphere =  .

Using the exact value of pi is not necessary, the approximate volume of the cones is okay.

The ice cream shop should use 3.14 to estimate the volume of the ice cream cones.

The exact volume of the cones is not necessary for ordering ice cream, as the ice cream shop only needs to know the approximate amount of ice cream that is sold each day.

Using 3.14 to estimate the volume of the cones will give the ice cream shop a good enough estimate for ordering the correct amount of ice cream.

Using the exact value of pi would only be necessary if the ice cream shop needed to know the exact volume of the cones for some other reason, such as for scientific research. In most cases, however, the approximate volume of the cones is okay.

Learn more about volume of cone on:

https://brainly.com/question/1082469

#SPJ1

The explicit formula for the sequence an = 1-en-1 nten is an = 1 - e^(n-1) * (n-1) * e.

Alternatively, if we consider the sequence an = 1-en-1 2+en, the explicit formula would be an = 1 - e^(n-1) * (n-1) * e + e^(n-1) * (n+1) * e. Lastly, if we consider the sequence an = 1-en 2+en, the explicit formula would be an = 1 - e^n * n * e + e^(n-1) * (n+2) * e.

Learn more about explicit here:

https://brainly.com/question/20713944

#SPJ11

Answer: The largest possible volume of the box is 2321.08 cubic centimeters, and this occurs when the side length of the square base is approximately 19.15 cm and the height of the box is approximately 6.84 cm.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's denote the side length of the square base as "x" and the height of the box as "h".Since the box has an open top, we only need to consider the 5 faces of the box. The area of the base is x^2, and the areas of the other four faces are each equal to xh (since the box has equal height on all sides).Thus, the total surface area of the box is:x^2 + 4xhWe are given that 1100 square centimeters of material is available to make the box, so we can set up an equation based on this information:x^2 + 4xh = 1100We want to maximize the volume of the box, which is given by:V = x^2h.

To solve for the maximum volume, we need to express h in terms of x using the equation for the surface area:4xh = 1100 - x^2

h = (1100 - x^2)/(4x)

Substituting this expression for h into the equation for the volume, we get:V = x^2 * (1100 - x^2)/(4x). Simplifying this expression, we get:V = (1/4)x(1100x - x^3)

To get the maximum volume, we need to take the derivative of this expression with respect to x, set it equal to zero, and solve for x:dV/dx = 275 - (3/4)x^2 = 0

x^2 = 366.67

x = 19.15 cm (rounded to two decimal places)

To check that this gives us a maximum, we can take the second derivative:

d^2V/dx^2 = -3x/2 < 0 (for x > 0)

Since the second derivative is negative, this tells us that we have found a maximum.Now we can find the corresponding value of h:

h = (1100 - x^2)/(4x)

h = (1100 - (366.67))/(4(19.15))

h = 6.84 cm (rounded to two decimal places)

Finally, we can calculate the maximum volume:

V = x^2h

V = (19.15)^2 * 6.84

V = 2321.08 cubic centimeters (rounded to two decimal places).

Therefore, the largest possible volume of the box is 2321.08 cubic centimeters, and this occurs when the side length of the square base is approximately 19.15 cm and the height of the box is approximately 6.84 cm.

Learn more about volume here, https://brainly.com/question/1972490

#SPJ11

The equation 140 + 35y + 102 - 70 = 0 can be simplified to 35y = -172, which gives y = -4.914.

The tetrahedron is bounded by the coordinate planes (x = 0, y = 0, z = 0) and the plane 140 + 35y + 102 - 70 = 0, which can be written as 35y = -172 or y = -4.914. Since the plane intersects the y-axis, it cuts off a triangular pyramid from the octant. The height of this pyramid is 4.914 units and its base is a right triangle with legs of length 140 and 102 units. Thus, the volume of this pyramid is given by:

V = (1/3) * (base area) * (height)

V = (1/3) * (140 * 102)/2 * 4.914

V = 14237.04 cubic units

To find the volume of the entire tetrahedron, we need to integrate over the region that the tetrahedron occupies. Since the tetrahedron is located in the first octant and bounded by the coordinate planes, we can set up the following triple integral:

∫∫∫E dV

where E is the solid region bounded by x = 0, y = 0, z = 0, and the plane 140 + 35y + 102 - 70 = 0. We can rewrite this equation as:

140 + 35y + 102 - 70 = 0

35y = -172

y = -4.914

Thus, the integral becomes:

∫∫∫E dV = ∫0^102 ∫0^(140-7/5y) ∫0^(-7/10y + 35/10) dz dx dy

The limits of integration for z are obtained from the equation of the plane, while the limits of integration for x and y are the limits of the triangular base of the tetrahedron.

Learn more about coordinate  here:

https://brainly.com/question/16634867

#SPJ11

The answer to the question is that we cannot determine the rate of change of the expected GPA with respect to the SAT score without additional information.

The partial rate-of-change function needed to answer this question is the partial derivative of G(h, s) with respect to s, denoted as ∂G/∂s.

Using the chain rule of differentiation, we can write:

∂G/∂s = (∂G/∂h) x (dh/ds) + (∂G/∂s)

where dh/ds is the rate of change of high school GPA with respect to SAT score.

To evaluate the partial derivative at (h,s) = (3.6, 1104), we need to compute both ∂G/∂h and dh/ds at that point. However, the problem does not provide any information about the functional form of G(h, s) or the relationship between high school GPA and SAT score. Without that information, it is not possible to calculate the partial rate-of-change function or the requested derivative.

Learn more about derivative at: brainly.com/question/29020856

#SPJ11

She can estimate that 50 seventh-graders will be boarding the bus to go to school.

The unitary technique entails finding the value by multiplying the single value and then solving the problem using the initial value of a single unit.

By using the unitary technique, we can determine the value of many units from the value of a single unit as well as the value of multiple units from the value of a single unit. We typically utilise this technique for math calculations.

10 out of the 32 children in the first-period class that we are given ride the bus to school. There are 160 students in seventh grade.

Therefore, we have;

160/32=5

10 x 5 =50

Thus, the answer is 50

To learn more about the unitary method follow,

brainly.com/question/23423168

#SPJ1

Gerry's decision will depend on a variety of factors, including the recommendations of his friends, the course syllabus, and his own personal preferences. It is important for him to carefully consider all of these factors before making his final decision.

Gerry is registering for classes next semester and he is deciding between two teachers, Dr. Anderson and Dr. Bean. In order to make an informed decision, Gerry speaks to 17 friends that previously took the course from Dr. Anderson and 17 friends that took it from Dr. Bean. Out of the 17 friends that took Dr. Anderson's course, 8 highly recommend him. Out of the 17 friends that took Dr. Bean's course, 11 highly recommend him.
Based on the recommendation of his friends, Gerry may be inclined to choose Dr. Bean, as he received more highly positive recommendations than Dr. Anderson. However, there are other factors that Gerry may want to consider before making his final decision. For example, Gerry may want to look at the syllabus for each course and compare them to see which one would be a better fit for his academic goals. He may also want to look at the times that each course is offered to see which one fits best with his schedule. Additionally, he may want to read reviews of both professors on websites such as Rate My Professor to see what other students have said about their teaching styles.
Ultimately, Gerry's decision will depend on a variety of factors, including the recommendations of his friends, the course syllabus, and his own personal preferences. It is important for him to carefully consider all of these factors before making his final decision.

To know more about semester visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22488734

#SPJ11

a. Null and alternative hypotheses:
H0: μ = 0.8535g (Green M&Ms have weights consistent with the package label)
H1: μ ≠ 0.8535g (Green M&Ms have weights inconsistent with the package label)

b. Critical value(s):
For a two-tailed test with α = 0.05, and df = 19 - 1 = 18, we consult a t-distribution table and find the critical value = ±2.101

c. Test Statistic:
t = (sample mean - hypothesized mean) / (standard deviation / √n) = (0.8635 - 0.8535) / (0.0570 / √19) = 0.10 / 0.0131 ≈ 7.63

Since the test statistic (7.63) is greater than the critical value (±2.101), we reject the null hypothesis.

Based on the statistical test, it appears that the mean weight of green M&Ms is not consistent with the weight printed on the package label.

To know more about null hypothesis visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19263925

#SPJ11

Answer:

1. -3

2. -5

3. -9

4. +16

5. -7

6. -3

7. -11

8. +11

9. -5

10. -5

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the limit using direct substitution, we simply plug in the given value into the function and see what the output is.

we are not given the function or the value we are supposed to plug in, so we cannot provide a specific answer. However, if we were given a function and a value, we would substitute the value into the function and simplify the expression. If the simplified expression does not have any undefined values (such as dividing by zero), then the limit exists and is equal to the output of the simplified expression.

To summarize, finding the limit using direct substitution involves substituting a given value into a function and simplifying the expression. If the simplified expression does not have any undefined values, then the limit exists and is equal to the output of the simplified expression.

To know more about function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

The approximate probability that at least 26 loans will result in default, out of 100 loans with a historical default rate of 20 percent, is 0.0846.

To solve this problem, we can use the binomial distribution formula, which is P(X ≥ k) = 1 - P(X < k), where X is a binomial random variable, k is the minimum number of successes we want to achieve (in this case, 26 defaults), and P is the probability of success on each trial (in this case, 0.2, or 20 percent).

Using this formula, we can find the probability of having less than 26 defaults as follows:

P(X < 26) = Σ(k=0 to 25) (100 choose k) * 0.2^k * (0.8)^(100-k) = 0.9154

(Note: the symbol "choose" represents the binomial coefficient, which can be calculated using the formula n choose k = n!/(k!(n-k)!)

Therefore, the probability of having at least 26 defaults is:

P(X ≥ 26) = 1 - P(X < 26) = 1 - 0.9154 = 0.0846

Therefore, the approximate probability that at least 26 loans will result in default is 0.0846.

For more questions like Probability click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Given that Jake's net pay is 160.65 after deductions of 68.85 and he makes 8.50 per hour. We need to find how much hours did he work. Let the hours he worked be h.

From the problem statement we can write an equation based on the above given information as:8.50h - 68.85 = 160.65Simplifying the equation,8.50h = 160.65 + 68.85= 229.50Now, dividing both sides by 8.5, we get,h = 229.50/8.5h ≈ 27Therefore, Jake worked for 27 hours .Let's verify this result: Total earning = 8.50hNet pay = Total earnings - Deductions=> 8.50 × 27 - 68.85 = 229.50 - 68.85 = 160.65Thus, the solution is Jake worked for 27 hours.

To know more about worked  visit:

brainly.com/question/31349430

#SPJ11

To calculate Randy's commission, we need to find 4.5% of the amount he sold in car stereos.

First, we convert the percentage to decimal form by dividing it by 100:

4.5% = 4.5/100 = 0.045

Next, we multiply the amount Randy sold by the commission rate:

Commission = $765.86 * 0.045

Commission = $34.4637 (rounded to four decimal places)

Therefore, Randy earns approximately $34.46 in commission.

Learn more about simple interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/25793394

#SPJ11

A(11) counts partitions of 11 into parts congruent to ±1 mod 6 is A(11) = 2 and B(11) counts partitions of 11 into distinct parts congruent to ±1 mod 3 is  B(11) = 2. C(11) counts partitions of 11 into parts differing by at least 3 and multiples of 3 differing by at least 6 is C(11) = 1.

A(11) counts the number of partitions of 11 into parts congruent to ±1 mod 6. One such partition is 11, which is already congruent to ±1 mod 6. Another partition is 7+1+1+1+1, which consists of four parts that are congruent to 1 mod 6 and one part that is congruent to -1 mod 6. Therefore, A(11) = 2.

B(11) counts the number of partitions of 11 into distinct parts congruent to ±1 mod 3. One such partition is 11, which is already congruent to ±1 mod 3. Another partition is 7+3+1, which consists of three distinct parts that are congruent to 1 mod 3. Therefore, B(11) = 2.

C(11) counts the number of partitions of 11 into parts that differ by at least 3, with the added condition that any parts that are multiples of 3 must differ by at least 6. One such partition is 11, which is the only way to partition 11 into parts that differ by at least 3. Therefore, C(11) = 1.

Therefore, the partitions of 11 counted by A(11), B(11), and C(11) are:
A(11): 11, 7+1+1+1+1
B(11): 11, 7+3+1
C(11): 11

To know more about partitions of numbers click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28195053

#SPJ11

(a) [tex]2 + (2 - 3/r) sin\theta cos\phi = 0[/tex], the equation in spherical coordinates.

(b) 3 sinθ cosφ + 4 sinθ sinφ + 2 cosθ = 1/r, the equation in spherical coordinates.

(a) To write the equation [tex]2x^2 - 3x + 2y^2 + 2z^2 = 0[/tex]in spherical coordinates, we need to express x, y, and z in terms of spherical coordinates. We have

x = r sinθ cosφ

y = r sinθ sinφ

z = r cosθ

Substituting these expressions into the given equation, we get

[tex]2(r sin\theta cos\phi)^2 - 3(r sin\theta cos\phi) + 2(r sin\theta sin\phi)^2 + 2(r cos\theta)^2 = 0[/tex]

Simplifying, we get

[tex]2r^2(sin^2\theta cos^2\phi + sin^2\theta sin^2\phi) + 2r^2 cos^2\theta - 3r sin\theta cos\phi = 0[/tex]

Using the identity [tex]sin^2\theta + cos^2\theta = 1[/tex], we can simplify this equation further to get

[tex]2r^2 + (2r^2 - 3r) sin\theta cos\phi = 0[/tex]

Dividing both sides by [tex]r^2[/tex] and rearranging, we get

[tex]2 + (2 - 3/r) sin\theta cos\phi = 0[/tex]

This is the equation in spherical coordinates.

(b) To write the equation 3x + 4y + 2z = 1 in spherical coordinates, we again need to express x, y, and z in terms of spherical coordinates. Substituting these expressions into the given equation, we get

3(r sinθ cosφ) + 4(r sinθ sinφ) + 2(r cosθ) = 1

Simplifying, we get

r(3 sinθ cosφ + 4 sinθ sinφ + 2 cosθ) = 1

Dividing both sides by r and rearranging, we get

3 sinθ cosφ + 4 sinθ sinφ + 2 cosθ = 1/r

This is the equation in spherical coordinates.

Learn more about spherical coordinates

brainly.com/question/4465072

#SPJ11

Answer:

To solve the equation 6x + 3 = 9 for x, the operations that must be performed on both sides of the equation in order to isolate the variable x are subtraction and then division.

What is a linear equation?

A linear equation in one variable has the standard form Px + Q = 0. In this equation, x is a variable, P is a coefficient, and Q is constant.

How to solve this problem?

Given that 6x + 3 = 9.

First, we have to separate variable and constants. So, we have to subtract 3 from both sides.

6x + 3 - 3 = 9 - 3

i.e. 6x = 6

Now, to solve this equation, we use division.

x = 6/6 = 1

i.e. x = 1

Therefore, to solve the equation 6x + 3 = 9 for x, the operations that must be performed on both sides of the equation in order to isolate the variable x are subtraction and then division.

Learn more about linear equations here -

brainly.com/question/25058584

#SPJ2

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve the equation 6x + 3 = -9, you can follow the following sequence:

6x + 3 - 3 = -9 - 3

This simplifies to 6x = -12.

This simplifies to x = -2.

Therefore, the solution to the equation 6x + 3 = -9 is x = -2.

Julie will paint 41 square feet of the wall on each of the next four days.

Julie is painting a mural on a rectangular wall in her school. The wall is 20.5 feet long and 10 feet wide. So far, her mural covers 20% of the wall. She will paint the remaining part of the wall over the next four days. She will paint the same amount of the wall on each of those four days.

We need to find the amount of the wall, in square feet, that Julie will paint on each of the next four days.

We know that the area of the wall is:

Area = length × width

= 20.5 feet × 10 feet

= 205 square feet

Julie has already painted 20% of the wall, so the area she has painted so far is:

20% of 205 square feet

= (20/100) × 205 square feet

= 41 square feet

Therefore, the area of the wall that still needs to be painted is:

Area of wall that still needs to be painted

= 205 square feet - 41 square feet

= 164 square feet

Julie will paint this remaining part of the wall over the next four days, and she will paint the same amount of the wall on each of those four days.

Therefore, she will paint:

164 square feet ÷ 4 = 41 square feet on each of the next four days.

So, Julie will paint 41 square feet of the wall on each of the next four days.

To know more about square feet visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30678567

#SPJ11

Thus, 1) The second derivative, with respect to x, of the wave function: d2dx2ψn(x) = -Cn^2(pi/L)^2sin(n*pi*x/L).

2) U(x)ψn(x) = 0

3) Eψn(x) = -Cn^2(pi/L)^2Esin(n*pi*x/L)

1) The second derivative, with respect to x, of the wave function ψn(x) in the interval 0≤x≤L can be found by applying the second derivative operator to the wave function:

d2dx2ψn(x) = -Cn^2(pi/L)^2sin(n*pi*x/L)

where n is the quantum number and C is the normalization constant.

2) U(x)ψn(x) is the product of the potential energy function U(x) and the wave function ψn(x) in the interval 0≤x≤L. If the potential energy function is zero in this interval, then U(x)ψn(x) is also zero.

Therefore, U(x)ψn(x) = 0.

3) Eψn(x) is the product of the energy E and the wave function ψn(x) in the interval 0≤x≤L. Substituting the wave function expression from part 1 into this product, we get:

Eψn(x) = -Cn^2(pi/L)^2Esin(n*pi*x/L)
where E is the energy of the particle.

Know more about the wave function

https://brainly.com/question/29751134

#SPJ11

The limit of the nth term as n becomes increasingly large is 1/3. The Option B.

To get limit of the nth term as n approaches infinity, we will analyze behavior of highest degree terms in the numerator and denominator.

In numerator, the highest degree term is [tex]2n^5.[/tex]

In denominator, the highest degree term is [tex]6n^4[/tex].

As the n becomes increasingly large, the influence of lower-degree terms becomes negligible when compared to highest degree terms.

The limit of the nth term is derived by dividing coefficient of highest degree term in numerator (2) by coefficient of the highest degree term in the denominator (6).

The limit is 2/6 which simplifies to 1/3.

Read more about sequence

brainly.com/question/6561461

#SPJ1

The sum of A² and B² (45.53) is not equal to C² (37.21). Therefore, the blocks cannot form a right-angled triangle, and the tower will not be stable.

To determine whether the tower will be stable, we need to check if the lengths of the blocks satisfy the conditions for forming a right-angled triangle. According to the Pythagorean theorem, in a right-angled triangle, the square of the length of the hypotenuse (the longest side) is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.

Let's label the blocks:

Blue block: Side A = 4.3 inches

Orange block: Side B = 5.2 inches

Red block: Side C = 6.1 inches

To form a stable tower, we need to check if the sum of the squares of the two shorter sides is equal to the square of the longest side.

Calculating the squares:

A² = 4.3² ≈ 18.49

B² = 5.2² ≈ 27.04

C² = 6.1² ≈ 37.21

Now, we need to find the longest side. Let's compare the squares:

C² (37.21) is the largest.

According to the Pythagorean theorem, for a right-angled triangle, the sum of the squares of the two shorter sides must be equal to the square of the longest side. In this case, the sum of the squares of A² and B² should be equal to C².

A² + B² ≈ 18.49 + 27.04 ≈ 45.53

However, the sum of A² and B² (45.53) is not equal to C² (37.21). Therefore, the blocks cannot form a right-angled triangle, and the tower will not be stable.

Learn more about Pythagorean theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ11

The maximum potential difference that can be applied between the plates without causing dielectric breakdown is 11 volts.

The maximum potential difference that can be applied between the plates without causing dielectric breakdown (i.e., breakdown of the insulating material) can be determined by calculating the breakdown voltage of the teflon. The breakdown voltage is the minimum voltage required to create an electric arc (or breakdown) across the insulating material. For teflon, the breakdown voltage is typically in the range of 40-60 kV/mm.

To find the maximum potential difference that can be applied between the plates, we need to convert the thickness of the teflon from millimeters to meters and then multiply it by the breakdown voltage per unit length:

[tex]t = 0.22 mm = 0.22 (10^{-3}) m[/tex]

breakdown voltage = 50 kV/mm = [tex]50 (10^3) V/m[/tex]

The maximum potential difference is then given by: V = Ed

where E is the breakdown voltage per unit length and d is the distance between the plates. Since the plates are separated by the thickness of the teflon, we have:

[tex]d = 0.22 (10^{-3} ) m[/tex]

Substituting the values, we get:

[tex]V = (50 (10^3) V/m) (0.22 ( 10^{-3} m) = 11 V[/tex]

Therefore, the maximum potential difference that can be applied between the plates without causing dielectric breakdown is 11 volts.

To know more about "Potential difference" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/23716417#

#SPJ11

The value of the line integral is 256/5.

We can parameterize the curve C as x = 4cos(t) and y = 4sin(t) for t in [0, pi/2]. Then, ds = sqrt((dx/dt)^2 + (dy/dt)^2) dt = 4 dt.

Substituting in these values, we have:

integral C xy^4 ds = integral from 0 to pi/2 of (4cos(t))(4sin(t))^4 (4) dt

= 256 integral from 0 to pi/2 of cos(t) sin^4(t) dt

We can use integration by substitution with u = sin(t) and du = cos(t) dt to get:

256 integral from 0 to 1 of u^4 du = 256 * (1/5) u^5 evaluated from 0 to 1

= 256/5

Know more about integral here:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

The equation of the parabola that satisfies the given conditions is y^2 = 20(x + 5)

The given information tells us that the conic is a parabola with focus at (-10, 0) and directrix x = 0.
Since the directrix is a vertical line, we know that the parabola is opening to the left or right. In this case, since the focus is to the left of the directrix, the parabola opens to the left.
The standard form of a parabola that opens to the left with focus (h, k) and directrix x = a is:
(y - k)^2 = 4p(x - h)
where p is the distance from the vertex (h, k) to the focus, and also from the vertex to the directrix. In this case, the vertex is halfway between the focus and directrix, so it is at (-5, 0).
Since the directrix is x = 0, which is a vertical line passing through the origin, the distance from the vertex to the directrix is simply 5.
Therefore, p = 5, and the equation of the parabola is:
(y - 0)^2 = 4(5)(x + 5)
y^2 = 20(x + 5)
This is the equation of the parabola that satisfies the given conditions.

Learn more about parabola here:

https://brainly.com/question/21685473

#SPJ11

Sally is trying to wrap a CD for her brother's birthday. The CD measures 0.5 cm by 14 cm by 12.5 cm. We need to calculate how much paper Sally will need to wrap the CD.

To calculate the amount of paper Sally needs, we need to calculate the surface area of the CD. The CD's surface area is calculated by adding up the areas of all six sides, which are all rectangles. Therefore, we need to calculate the area of each rectangle and then add them together to find the total surface area.The CD has three sides that measure 14 cm by 12.5 cm and two sides that measure 0.5 cm by 12.5 cm. Finally, it has one side that measures 0.5 cm by 14 cm.So, we have to calculate the area of all the sides:14 x 12.5 = 175 (two sides)12.5 x 0.5 = 6.25 (two sides)14 x 0.5 = 7 (one side)Total surface area = 175 + 175 + 6.25 + 6.25 + 7 = 369.5 cm²Therefore, Sally will need 369.5 cm² of paper to wrap the CD.

To know more about birthday visit:

brainly.com/question/10151363

#SPJ11

Thus, the curl of the vector field F = (x2 − y2) i + 4xy j is (2x − 2y) k.

The curl of a vector field is a measure of how much the field rotates around a point. To compute the curl of the given vector field F = (x2 − y2) i + 4xy j, we need to calculate the cross product of the gradient operator (del) and F.

Using the formula for the curl, we have:
curl F = (∂Fz/∂y − ∂Fy/∂z) i + (∂Fx/∂z − ∂Fz/∂x) j + (∂Fy/∂x − ∂Fx/∂y) k

Where Fx, Fy, and Fz are the components of F in the x, y, and z directions, respectively.

In this case, F has no z-component, so we can simplify the formula to:
curl F = (∂Fy/∂x − ∂Fx/∂y) k

Now, let's calculate the partial derivatives:
∂Fx/∂y = 0 - (-2y) = 2y
∂Fy/∂x = 2x - 0 = 2x

Therefore, the curl of F is:
curl F = (2x − 2y) k

This means that the field rotates around the z-axis with a magnitude proportional to the difference between x and y. The curl is zero when x equals y, which corresponds to a point of no rotation.

In summary, the curl of the vector field F = (x2 − y2) i + 4xy j is (2x − 2y) k.

Know more about the gradient operator (del)

https://brainly.com/question/29818491

#SPJ11

a. we can express it as v_ocean = 6i. b. the velocity of the salmon relative to the ocean is (3i - 3√3j) miles per hour. c. The true speed of the salmon is the magnitude of its true velocity 6√3 miles per hour.

(a) The velocity of the ocean current is a vector pointing due east with a magnitude of 6 miles per hour. Therefore, we can express it as:

v_ocean = 6i

where i is the unit vector pointing due east.

(b) The velocity of the salmon relative to the ocean is the vector difference between the velocity of the salmon and the velocity of the ocean. The velocity of the salmon is a vector pointing in the direction of N30°W with a magnitude of 6 miles per hour. We can express it as:

v_salmon = 6(cos 30°i - sin 30°j)

where i is the unit vector pointing due east and j is the unit vector pointing due north. Therefore, the velocity of the salmon relative to the ocean is:

v_salmon,ocean = 6(cos 30°i - sin 30°j) - 6i

= (6cos 30° - 6)i - 6sin 30°j

= (3i - 3√3j) miles per hour

(c) The true velocity of the salmon is the vector sum of the velocity of the salmon relative to the ocean and the velocity of the ocean. Therefore, we have:

v_true = v_salmon,ocean + v_ocean

= (3i - 3√3j) + 6i

= (9i - 3√3j) miles per hour

(d) The true speed of the salmon is the magnitude of its true velocity, which is:

|v_true| = √(9^2 + (-3√3)^2) miles per hour

= √(81 + 27) miles per hour

= √108 miles per hour

= 6√3 miles per hour

(e) The true direction of the salmon is given by the angle between its true velocity vector and the positive x-axis (i.e., due east). We can find this angle using the inverse tangent function:

θ = tan^-1(-3√3/9)

= -30°

Since the direction is measured counterclockwise from the positive x-axis, the true direction of the salmon is N30°E.

Learn more about magnitude here

https://brainly.com/question/30337362

#SPJ11

The true direction of the salmon is approximately N30°W.

The velocity of the ocean current can be expressed as a vector v_ocean = 6i, where i is the unit vector in the east direction.

(b) The velocity of the salmon relative to the ocean can be found by subtracting the velocity of the ocean current from the velocity of the salmon. Since the salmon is swimming in the direction of N30°W, we can express its velocity as a vector v_salmon = 6(cos(30°)i - sin(30°)j), where i is the unit vector in the east direction and j is the unit vector in the north direction.

Relative velocity of the salmon = v_salmon - v_ocean

= 6(cos(30°)i - sin(30°)j) - 6i

= 6(cos(30°)i - sin(30°)j - i)

= 6(0.866i - 0.5j - i)

= 6(-0.134i - 0.5j)

= -0.804i - 3j

(c) The true velocity of the salmon is the vector sum of the velocity of the salmon relative to the ocean and the velocity of the ocean current. Therefore, the true velocity of the salmon is v_true = v_salmon + v_ocean.

v_true = -0.804i - 3j + 6i

= 5.196i - 3j

(d) The true speed of the salmon can be found using the magnitude of its true velocity:

True speed of the salmon = |v_true| = sqrt((5.196)^2 + (-3)^2)

= sqrt(26.969216 + 9)

= sqrt(35.969216)

≈ 6.0 miles per hour

(e) The true direction of the salmon can be found by calculating the angle between the true velocity vector and the north direction (N). Using the arctan function:

True direction of the salmon = atan(-3 / 5.196)

= atan(-0.577)

≈ -30.96°

Know more about velocity here:

https://brainly.com/question/17127206

#SPJ11