Find an equation for the perpendicular bisector of the line segment whose endpoints are (−2,−9) and (−6,7)

when working with categorical data, a bar chart is the most appropriate choice to effectively communicate and compare the frequencies or proportions of different categories.

A bar chart is a visual representation of data using rectangular bars. It is commonly used to display and compare categorical data. Categorical data consists of distinct categories or groups that are not inherently ordered or measured numerically. Examples of categorical data include types of animals, colors, or survey responses (e.g., "Yes," "No," "Maybe").

In a bar chart, each category is represented by a separate bar, and the height of each bar corresponds to the frequency or count of observations in that category. The bars are typically arranged along the horizontal or vertical axis, making it easy to compare the frequencies or proportions of different categories.

On the other hand, numerical or continuous data refers to data that can be measured and represented on a continuous scale, such as height, temperature, or time. For such data, other types of charts, such as line graphs or histograms, may be more suitable for visualizing patterns, trends, or distributions.

Learn more about rectangular bars here:

https://brainly.com/question/29193433

#SPJ11

The dimensions that require the minimum amount of material for the open-top box are:

Length = 8 inches, Width = 8 inches, Height = 4 inches.

To find the dimensions that minimize the amount of material needed, we can approach the problem by using calculus and optimization techniques. Let's denote the length of the square bottom as "x" inches and the height of the box as "h" inches. Since the volume of the box is given as 256 cubic inches, we have the equation:

Volume = Length × Width × Height = x² × h = 256.

To minimize the material used, we need to minimize the surface area of the box. The surface area consists of the bottom area (x²) and the combined areas of the four sides (4xh). Therefore, the total surface area (A) is given by the equation:

A = x² + 4xh.

We can solve for h in terms of x using the volume equation:

h = 256 / (x²).

Substituting this expression for h in terms of x into the surface area equation, we get:

A = x² + 4x(256 / (x²)).

Simplifying further, we obtain:

A = x² + 1024 / x.

To minimize A, we take the derivative of A with respect to x, set it equal to zero, and solve for x:

dA/dx = 2x - 1024 / x² = 0.

Solving this equation yields x = 8 inches. Plugging this value back into the equation for h, we find h = 4 inches.

Therefore, the dimensions that require the minimum amount of material are: Length = 8 inches, Width = 8 inches, and Height = 4 inches.

Learn more about Optimization techniques

brainly.com/question/28315344

#SPJ11

a) The graph of the ANOVA test is illustrated below.

b) The relationship between identification and empathy for

i)  Students who played neutral games is 0.328

ii. Students who played Half-Life is 0.035

iii. Students who played GTA is 0.149

Using the data provided, we can perform ANOVA by fitting a linear model with "game.type" as the independent variable and "empathy" as the dependent variable. We can then use the "anova" function in R to perform the ANOVA test. The results show that the p-value for the "game.type" variable is 0.000242, which is less than the significance level of 0.05. This indicates that there is a significant difference between the mean empathy scores for the different types of games.

To further investigate this difference, we can use Tukey's HSD post-hoc test to compare the means of each pair of game types. The results show that the mean empathy score for GTA games is significantly lower than the mean empathy score for neutral games (p-value < 0.001) and Half-Life games (p-value = 0.002), but there is no significant difference between the mean empathy scores for neutral and Half-Life games.

To explore the relationship between identification and empathy, we can first subset the data for individuals who played each type of game using the "subset" function in R. We can then create scatterplots to visualize the relationship between identification and empathy for each subset.

For students who played neutral games, the scatterplot shows a positive correlation between identification and empathy, suggesting that individuals who identified more with their game character also had higher empathy scores. However, the correlation is not significant (p-value = 0.328), indicating that we cannot reject the null hypothesis of no correlation.

For students who played Half-Life, the scatterplot also shows a positive correlation between identification and empathy, which is significant (p-value = 0.035). This suggests that individuals who identified more with their Half-Life game character also had higher empathy scores.

For students who played GTA, the scatterplot shows a negative correlation between identification and empathy, indicating that individuals who identified more with their GTA game character had lower empathy scores. However, the correlation is not significant (p-value = 0.149), indicating that we cannot reject the null hypothesis of no correlation.

To know more about ANOVA test here

https://brainly.com/question/30127764

#SPJ4

In order to solve the heat equation with non-homogeneous boundary conditions, we can use a technique known as the method of separation of variables.

Yes, that's correct. In order to solve the heat equation with non-homogeneous boundary conditions, we can use a technique known as the method of separation of variables.

This technique involves assuming that the solution to the heat equation can be written as a product of functions, each of which depends only on one of the spatial variables.

Once we have found the solution to the homogeneous heat equation with the given boundary conditions, we can subtract this solution from the solution to the non-homogeneous problem to obtain a new function that satisfies the non-homogeneous boundary conditions.

This is because the difference between the two functions satisfies the homogeneous boundary conditions, and therefore the heat equation. By applying the initial conditions to this new function, we can obtain the solution to the non-homogeneous heat equation with the given boundary conditions.

Learn more about  heat equation

brainly.com/question/28205183

#SPJ11

(a) (i) For all printers P, if printer P is out of service or busy, then all print jobs are lost. (ii) There exists a print job J such that if job J is lost, then all printers are out of service. (iii) For all print jobs J, if job J is queued, then there exists a printer P that is out of service.

(b) To show they are not equivalent, we can construct a truth table and find that there is a row where they have different truth values.

(a) (i) For all printers p, if printer p is out of service or printer p is busy, then print job j is lost.

(ii) There exists a print job j such that if print job j is lost, then printer p is out of service and printer q is busy.

(iii) For all print jobs j, if print job j is queued, then there exists a printer p such that printer p is out of service.

(b) To show that ‘v’r(P(.r)) V ‘v’r(Q(Qm( ))) and ‘v’$(P($) V (2(a)) are not logically equivalent, we can construct a truth table for both statements and find that there is at least one row where the truth values differ.

To know more about truth table,

https://brainly.com/question/31482105

#SPJ11

The equilibrium price and quantity of gasoline are $3.33 per gallon and 833.33 gallons respectively.

To find the equilibrium price and quantity, we need to set the demand equal to the supply:

5 - 0.002q = 0.2 + 0.004q

Solving for q, we get q = 833.33 gallons.

To find the equilibrium price, we can substitute q back into either the demand or supply equation. Using the demand equation, we get p = $3.33 per gallon.

Therefore, the equilibrium price and quantity of gasoline are $3.33 per gallon and 833.33 gallons respectively.

For more questions like Price click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30271363

#SPJ11

The value of y' is found to be approximately 0.748 ft.

The specific energy, E, in open channel flow, can be calculated using the equation E = [tex]y + Q^2/(2gy^2)[/tex] where y is the depth of flow, Q is the flow rate, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

In this case, Q = y * width * velocity = [tex]2 ft * 5 ft * 7.5 ft/s = 75 ft^3/s.[/tex]

Substituting these values in, the specific energy, E, is found to be E = 2 ft + (75 ft³/s)² / (2 * 32.2 ft/s² * (2 ft)²) = 3.466 ft.

The alternate depth, y', can be found by solving the equation 3.466 ft

= [tex]y' + (75 ft^3/s)^2 / (2 * 32.2 ft/s^2 * (y')^2) for y'.[/tex]

This is a quadratic equation and using the positive root for supercritical flow, y' is found to be approximately 0.748 ft.

Read more about specific energy here:

https://brainly.com/question/13257186

#SPJ1

The solution of the differential equation t ln (t) dr/dt + r = 3te^t is  r = (3/t) - 3e^(-t)/ln(t) + C/ln(t)

To solve the given differential equation:

t ln(t) dr/dt + r = 3te^t             ...... (1)

Divide the equation (1) by t ln(t) then equation (1) chages to:

dr/dt + (1/t ln(t))r = 3e^t/t ln(t)

The given equation is a reducible linear differential equation to reduce in linear form we multiply by the integrating factor.

The integrating factor is given by:

μ(t) = e^∫(1/t ln(t))dt

= e^ln(ln(t))

= ln(t)

Thus,

ln(t) dr/dt + r ln(t) = 3te^t

d/dt (r ln(t)) = ln(t) dr/dt + r/t

Substituting this into the equation, we get:

d/dt (r ln(t)) = 3te^t/t

Integrate both sides;

r ln(t) = 3e^t ln(t) - 3e^t + C

r = (3/t) - 3e^(-t)/ln(t) + C/ln(t)

r = (3/t) - 3e^(-t)/ln(t) + C/ln(t)

hence, the solution of the differential equation is r = (3/t) - 3e^(-t)/ln(t) + C/ln(t), where C is a arbitrary constant.

Know more about linear differential equation click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30645878

#SPJ11

The given series ∑ [tex](3n(4n^2))^2[/tex] converges.

To determine whether the series converges or diverges, we can use the limit comparison test.

The given series is ∑ [tex](3n(4n^2))^2[/tex], where n starts from 1 and goes to infinity.

Let's simplify the series first:

[tex](3n(4n^2))^2 = 9n^2 * 16n^4 = 144n^6[/tex]

Now, let's consider the series ∑ [tex]144n^6.[/tex]

To apply the limit comparison test, we need to find a known series ∑ [tex]b_n[/tex]that converges/diverges and has positive terms.

We can compare it with the series ∑ [tex]n^6.[/tex]

Taking the limit of the ratio of the nth terms of the two series, we have:

lim (n → ∞)[tex](144n^6 / n^6)[/tex] = 144

Since the limit is a finite positive number (144), we can conclude that if the series ∑ [tex]n^6[/tex] converges, then the series ∑[tex]144n^6[/tex] also converges. Similarly, if ∑ [tex]n^6[/tex] diverges, then ∑ [tex]144n^6[/tex] also diverges.

Now, we know that the series ∑ [tex]n^6[/tex] converges (it is a p-series with p = 6 > 1), therefore, by the limit comparison test, the series ∑ [tex]144n^6[/tex] also converges.

Learn more about limit comparison test

brainly.com/question/31362838

#SPJ11

False. A raster data model is not necessarily a better representation of reality compared to the vector model.

The statement is false. The choice between a raster data model and a vector data model depends on the specific use case and the nature of the data being represented. While raster data models are well-suited for representing continuous data, such as elevation or satellite imagery, they can be limited in accurately representing discrete objects, such as roads or buildings.

Vector data models, on the other hand, excel at representing discrete objects with precise boundaries and attributes. The accuracy and precision of points, lines, and polygons in a vector model make it a suitable choice for many applications, including cartography, urban planning, and transportation analysis. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the specific requirements and characteristics of the data being represented.

Learn more about vector model here:

https://brainly.com/question/31790778

#SPJ11

A matrix equation is an equation that involves matrices and is typically written in the form AX = B, where A, X, and B are matrices. In this equation, A is the coefficient matrix, X is the variable matrix, and B is the constant matrix.

The given system of equations is:

6x1 + 4x2 = 30

8x2 = 71

To write this system as a matrix equation of the form AX = B, we can arrange the coefficients of x1 and x2 into a matrix A, the variables x1 and x2 into a column matrix X, and the constants into a column matrix B. Then, we have:

A = [6 4; 0 8]

X = [x1; x2]

B = [30; 71]

So, the matrix equation in the form AX = B becomes:

[6 4; 0 8][x1; x2] = [30; 71]

or,

[6x1 + 4x2; 8x2] = [30; 71]

which is equivalent to the original system of equations.

To learn more about matrices visit:

brainly.com/question/11367104

#SPJ11

The percentage of blue marbles is 15.625%

To find this percentage, we need to use the formula:

P = 100%*(number of blue marbles)/(total number of marbles).

Using the given diagram, we can see that there are 5 blue marbles, and the total number of marbles is:

Total = 5 + 10 + 9 + 8

Total = 32

Then the percentage of blue marbles is given by:

P = 100%*(5/32)

P = 100%*(0.15625)

P = 15.625%

That is the percentage.

Learn more about percentages at:

https://brainly.com/question/843074

#SPJ1

The degrees of freedom for the test is (5, 48). The p-value for this F-statistic can be obtained from an F-distribution table or calculator with the appropriate degrees of freedom.

The degrees of freedom for the regression is 5 and the sum of squares for the regression is 4,001.11. Therefore, the mean square for the regression is:

MS(regression) = SS(regression) / DF(regression) = 4,001.11 / 5 = 800.22

The degrees of freedom for the residual is 48 and the sum of squares for the residual is 2,610.04. Therefore, the mean square for the residual is:

MS(residual) = SS(residual) / DF(residual) = 2,610.04 / 48 = 54.38

The F-statistic for testing the null hypothesis that all the regression coefficients are zero is:

F = MS(regression) / MS(residual) = 800.22 / 54.38 = 14.72

Know more about degrees of freedom here:

https://brainly.com/question/31424137

#SPJ11

The correct option is the third one, the explicit formula for the sequence is:

aₙ = 52 - 5n

Here we have what it seems to be an arithmetic sequence:

47, 42, 37, 32, ...

We can see that the difference between each pair of consecutive terms is -5, so that is the common difference of the sequence:

42 - 47 = -5

37 - 42 = -5

32 - 37 = -5

Then the explicit formula for the arithmetic sequence is:

aₙ = a₁ + (n - 1)*d

Where a₁ is the initial value, and d is the common difference.

So the explicit formula is:

aₙ = 47 + (n - 1)*(-5)

We can simplify this to get:

aₙ = 47  - 5n + 5

aₙ = 52 - 5n

The correct option is the third one.

Learn more about sequences at:

https://brainly.com/question/6561461

#SPJ1

The area of the shaded region for the two circle is equal to 12π

The area of a circle is π multiplied by the square of the radius. The area of a circle when the radius 'r' is given is πr².

Area of circle = πr²

π = 22/7

radius = r

For the bigger circle;

πr² = 48π

r² = 48 {divide through by π}

take square root of both sides;

r = √48 = 4√3

radius of the shaded smaller circle = 4√3/2

radius of the shaded smaller circle = 2√3

Area of the shaded region = π × (2√3)²

Area of the shaded region = π × 4(3)

Area of the shaded region = 12π

Therefore, the area of the shaded region for the two circle is equal to 12π

Read more about area here:https://brainly.com/question/76387

#SPJ1

Seriyah can claim $14,710 as a deduction on her medical expenses.

To calculate the amount that Seriyah can claim as a medical deduction, we need to determine the threshold for deductibility based on the IRS rules. The threshold is 7.5% of Seriyah's adjusted gross income (AGI).

7.5% of Seriyah's AGI = 7.5% * $42,300 = $3,172.50

Since Seriyah's medical expenses of $21,560 exceed the threshold, she can claim the amount that exceeds the threshold as a deduction.

Amount exceeding the threshold = Medical expenses - Threshold

                          = $21,560 - $3,172.50

                          = $18,387.50

Now, we need to calculate 80% of the amount exceeding the threshold, which is covered by her medical insurance.

Insurance coverage = 80% * $18,387.50

                 = $14,710

Therefore, Seriyah can claim $14,710 as a deduction on her medical expenses.

For more such questions on claim,click on

https://brainly.com/question/28995978

#SPJ8      

Answer:

130°

Step-by-step explanation:

BC = BD

BC + BD + DC = 360°

BC + BC + 100° = 360°

2BC = (360 - 100)°

2BC = 260°

BC = 260/2

BC = 130°

Answer:

130 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

We already know that CD = 100.

We also know that all 3 arcs in this circumscribed circle have to equal 360.

So, let's write an equation and solve for BC:

BC+CD+BD=360

BC=BD

we know this because side lengths BC and BD are congruent

(BC+BD)+100=360

we can combine like terms and substitute in our known value of CD

BC+BD=260

subtract 100 from both sides

BC+BC=260

substitute in BC=BD

2BC=260

combine like terms

BC=130

divide both sides by 2 to get BC

This means that option C (130 degrees) is correct.  Hope this helps! :)

We got the same numerator, which indicates that both fractions have the same value.Hence, the answer is 6/5.

To determine whether 4x3/2/5 or 3x4/2/5 is larger without multiplying, we must simplify the fractions first. Here's how:4 × 3 = 12 2 × 5 = 10So, 4x3/2/5 = 12/10 = 6/5Also, 3 × 4 = 12 2 × 5 = 10So, 3x4/2/5 = 12/10 = 6/5As a result, we may see that both fractions have the same value of 6/5. So, both 4x3/2/5 and 3x4/2/5 are equivalent.The procedure we used to determine which fraction is larger without multiplying is as follows: We simply compared the numerator's product of each fraction. As a result, we got the same numerator, which indicates that both fractions have the same value.Hence, the answer is 6/5.

Learn more about fraction here,

https://brainly.com/question/30154928

#SPJ11

The average price per pound for all the coffee sold is $5.52 per pound, when 650 lb of coffee are sold when the price is $4 per pound, and 400 lb are sold at $8 per pound.

Suppose that 650 lb of coffee are sold when the price is $4 per pound, and 400 lb are sold at $8 per pound. We have to find the average price per pound for all the coffee sold.

Average price is equal to the total cost of coffee sold divided by the total number of pounds sold. We can use the following formula:

Average price per pound = (total revenue / total pounds sold)

In this case, the total revenue is the sum of the revenue from selling 650 pounds at $4 per pound and the revenue from selling 400 pounds at $8 per pound. That is:

total revenue = (650 lb * $4/lb) + (400 lb * $8/lb)

= $2600 + $3200

= $5800

The total pounds sold is simply the sum of 650 pounds and 400 pounds, which is 1050 pounds. That is:

total pounds sold = 650 lb + 400 lb

= 1050 lb

Using the formula above, we can calculate the average price per pound:

Average price per pound = total revenue / total pounds sold= $5800 / 1050

lb= $5.52 per pound

Therefore, the average price per pound for all the coffee sold is $5.52 per pound, when 650 lb of coffee are sold when the price is $4 per pound, and 400 lb are sold at $8 per pound.

To know more about average price visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3308839

#SPJ11

As the sample size (n) increases, the power of the statistical test also increases.

The power of a statistical test measures the ability of the test to detect a true effect or reject a false null hypothesis. In this case, the investigator states that the power of his test at a significance level of 1% is 0.87. If the sample size (n) increases, the power of the test increases.

Increasing the sample size generally leads to an increase in the power of a statistical test. This is because a larger sample size provides more information and reduces the variability in the data. With a larger sample size, the test has a greater chance of detecting a true effect and rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false. Consequently, the power of the test increases.

In summary, as the sample size (n) increases, the power of the statistical test also increases. This is because a larger sample size enhances the test's ability to detect true effects and reject false null hypotheses, resulting in higher statistical power. Therefore, in this scenario, increasing the sample size would lead to an increase in the power of the test.

Learn more about statistical test here:

https://brainly.com/question/31746962

#SPJ11

Starting with the least likely event, the chances of a politician fulfilling all his or her campaign promises can be quite low due to the complexities of politics and the potential for unforeseen circumstances.

Next, while full moons are relatively common, they occur approximately once a month, making it more likely than the politician's scenario but less likely than the other events.

Rolling a die and getting a 6 has a higher likelihood as there is a 1 in 6 chance of rolling a 6 on a fair six-sided die. The safe arrival of a person in New York City from Chicago is more probable than the previous events but still has an element of uncertainty regarding the fate of their luggage.

Randomly selecting an ace from a regular deck of 52 playing cards has a higher probability compared to the previous events, as there are four aces in a deck. The likelihood increases further when randomly selecting the queen of hearts, which is only one specific card out of the 52-card deck.

Finally, selecting a black card from a regular deck has the highest probability among the listed events since there are 26 black cards in the deck, including all the clubs and spades.

Learn more about probability here: https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The expected value of this discrete probability distribution is 2.93, and the variance is 1.21.

To find the expected value of the discrete probability distribution for this four-sided fair die, we use the formula:

E(X) = Σ(xi * Pi)

where xi represents the possible outcomes of the die, and Pi represents the probability of each outcome. In this case, the possible outcomes are 1, 2, 3, and 4, with probabilities of 9/30, 4/30, 7/30, and 10/30 respectively.

Therefore, the expected value of X is:

E(X) = (1 * 9/30) + (2 * 4/30) + (3 * 7/30) + (4 * 10/30) = 2.93

To find the variance, we first need to calculate the squared deviations of each outcome from the expected value, which is given by:

[tex](xi - E(X))^2 * Pi[/tex]

We then sum up these values to get the variance:

[tex]Var(X) = Σ[(xi - E(X))^2 * Pi][/tex]

This calculation gives a variance of approximately 1.21.

Therefore, the expected value of this discrete probability distribution is 2.93, and the variance is 1.21.

To know more about probability refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

log2 (7) = x  

2^(log2(7) )  = 2^x

        7 = 2^x                   <======this may be what you want

The expression ln(y) ln(z) can be condensed to ln(yz) using the product rule of logarithms. To condense the expression ln(y) ln(z) using the properties of logarithms, we can simplify it into a single logarithm expression.

1. The product rule of logarithms states that ln(a) + ln(b) is equal to ln(a * b). Applying this rule, we can rewrite the given expression as ln(yz).

2. The natural logarithm ln is a mathematical function that gives the logarithm of a number with respect to the base e. When dealing with logarithms, certain rules and properties can help simplify expressions.

3. In this case, we have ln(y) ln(z), where ln(y) and ln(z) are separate logarithmic terms. By applying the product rule of logarithms, we can combine these terms into a single logarithmic expression.

4. The product rule states that the logarithm of a product is equal to the sum of the logarithms of the individual factors. Therefore, ln(y) + ln(z) simplifies to ln(yz). This condenses the expression into a more concise form. So, the expression ln(y) ln(z) can be condensed to ln(yz) using the product rule of logarithms.

Learn more about natural logarithm here: brainly.com/question/29154694

#SPJ11

The solution to x' = jx using exp(jt) is x(t) = ce^(jt), where c is a constant.

We start by assuming that x(t) = ce^(jt), then taking its derivative we get x'(t) = c(j)e^(jt). We substitute these values into the equation x' = jx and get c(j)e^(jt) = jce^(jt). We can then divide both sides by ce^(jt) to get j = j, which is true. This means that our assumption of x(t) = ce^(jt) is valid, and the solution is x(t) = ce^(jt).

The exponential function e^(jt) is a complex-valued function that can be used to represent sinusoidal functions with angular frequency t. In this case, we use it to represent the solution to the differential equation x' = jx. By assuming that x(t) is of the form ce^(jt), we are essentially saying that the function x(t) is a sinusoidal function with angular frequency t, and that its amplitude is a constant c.

The solution to x' = jx using exp(jt) is x(t) = ce^(jt), where c is a constant. This solution represents a sinusoidal function with angular frequency t, and its amplitude is a constant c.

To know more about constant, visit;

https://brainly.com/question/27983400

#SPJ11

The value of the 'x' is 3.7 units

Given a right-angle triangle, Hypotenuse is 15 units and one of the angles is 42°

To find 'x' We have to use trigonometric ratios

The cosine (cos) of an angle in a right triangle is the ratio of the length of the adjacent side to the angle to the length of the hypotenuse.

cos θ = Adjacent Side / Hypotenuse.  

From the figure, The length of the Adjacent side of the angle = x and the length of Hypotenuse = 15

cos 42° = x/15

0.74 = x/5

Multiply by 5 on both sides

5 [x/5] = 5 × 0.74

x = 3.7

Therefore, The value of the 'x' is 3.7 units

To know more about  Trigonometric ratios here

https://brainly.com/question/23130410

#SPJ1

A standard normal distribution table or calculator, the p-value for z = 5.98 is less than 0.0001, which is much smaller than the typical alpha level of 0.05. Option (d) is the correct answer.

To determine if the proportion of 12th-graders who eat breakfast daily is lower than the proportion of 9th-graders, we need to conduct a hypothesis test. Let p1 and p2 be the true population proportions of 9th and 12th graders who eat breakfast daily, respectively. Our null hypothesis is that the two population proportions are equal, i.e. H0: p1 = p2, and the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of 12th graders is lower, i.e. Ha: p1 < p2.

We can use a z-test to compare the proportions. The test statistic is given by

z = (p1 - p2) / sqrt(p_hat * (1 - p_hat) * (1/n1 + 1/n2))

where p_hat = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2), x1 and x2 are the number of 9th and 12th graders who ate breakfast daily, respectively, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.

Plugging in the values given in the problem, we get:

p1 = 1374/3470 = 0.396

p2 = 1116/3301 = 0.338

n1 = 3470, n2 = 3301

p_hat = (1374 + 1116) / (3470 + 3301) = 0.367

z = (0.396 - 0.338) / sqrt(0.367 * (1 - 0.367) * (1/3470 + 1/3301)) = 5.98

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, the p-value for z = 5.98 is less than 0.0001, which is much smaller than the typical alpha level of 0.05.

Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence to suggest that the proportion of 12th-graders who eat breakfast daily is lower than the proportion of 9th-graders eating breakfast daily. The numerical value of the z statistic for comparing the proportions of 9th- and 12th-graders who ate breakfast daily is 5.98.  Option (d) is the correct answer.

To learn more about Normal distribution :

https://brainly.com/question/4079902

#SPJ11

The numerical value of the z statistic for comparing the proportions of 9th- and 12th-graders who ate breakfast daily is 3.86.

To test whether the proportion of 12th-graders who eat breakfast daily is lower than the proportion of 9th-graders, we can use a hypothesis test with the following null and alternative hypotheses:

H0: P9 = P12

Ha: P9 < P12

where P9 and P12 are the true proportions of all 9th- and 12th-graders who eat breakfast daily.

We can use a z-test for the difference between two proportions to test this hypothesis. The formula for the test statistic is:

z = (p1 - p2) / SE

where p1 and p2 are the sample proportions, and SE is the standard error of the difference between the proportions:

SE = sqrt(p(1-p) / n1 + p(1-p) / n2)

where p is the pooled proportion of successes, defined as:

p = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2)

and x1, x2, n1, and n2 are the number of successes and sample sizes for the two groups.

Plugging in the values from the problem, we have:

p1 = 1374 / 3470 = 0.396

p2 = 1116 / 3301 = 0.338

n1 = 3470

n2 = 3301

p = (1374 + 1116) / (3470 + 3301) = 0.368

SE = sqrt(0.368(1-0.368) / 3470 + 0.368(1-0.368) / 3301) = 0.015

z = (0.396 - 0.338) / 0.015 = 3.86

Know more about z statistic here:

https://brainly.com/question/22443207

#SPJ11

About 95% of the buyers paid between $17,000 and $25,000 for the particular model of the car.Normal distribution graph for prices paid for a particular model of a new car with mean $21,000 and standard deviation $2000.

We need to find what percentage of buyers paid between $17,000 and $25,000 using the 68-95-99.7 rule.

So, the z-score for $17,000 is

[tex]z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{17,000-21,000}{2,000}[/tex]

=-2

The z-score for $25,000 is

[tex]z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{25,000-21,000}{2,000}[/tex]

=2

Therefore, using the 68-95-99.7 rule, the percentage of buyers paid between $17,000 and $25,000 is within 2 standard deviations of the mean, which is approximately 95% of the total buyers.

To know more about  mean please visit :

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ11

The area of the figure is 84 in².

We have,

The figure has two shapes.

Trapezium and a triangle.

Now,

Area of the trapezium.

= 1/2 x (14 + 25) x (2 + 2)

= 1/2 x 39 x 4

= 78 in²

And,

Area of the triangle.

= 1/2 x 4 x 3

= 1/2 x 4 x 3

= 6 in²

Now,

Area of the figure.

= 78 + 6

= 84 in²

Thus,

The area of the figure is 84 in².

Learn more about trapezium here:

https://brainly.com/question/22607187

#SPJ1

The value for the new mean, after removing a score with a value of X = 4 from the population, is c. 66/7.

To calculate the new mean, we need to subtract the score that is removed from the original sum of scores and then divide by the new number of scores.

Given that the population originally has N = 7 scores with a mean of μ = 10, the sum of the scores is N * μ = 7 * 10 = 70.

When the score of 4 is removed, the sum of the remaining scores becomes 70 - 4 = 66. The new number of scores is N - 1 = 7 - 1 = 6.

Therefore, the new mean is 66/6 = 11.

Learn more about population

brainly.com/question/15889243

#SPJ11