Help APSP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer:

3/35

Step-by-step explanation:

3*1=3

5*7=35

3/35

Answer:

37.50/5 = $7.50/week

so the difference is 8.25-7.50 = $0.75/week

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2/9

Step-by-step explanation:

4/18 and that can be reduced by dividing both (denominator and numerator) by 2 which leaves you with 2/9

Hope that helps and have a great day!

Answer:

[tex](-5,\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Midpoint Formula: [tex](\frac{x_1+x_2}{2},\frac{y_1+y_2}{2} )[/tex]

Simply plug in your coordinates into the midpoint formula to find midpoint:

R(-2, 3)

S(-8, -2)

[tex](\frac{-2+-8}{2},\frac{3+-2}{2} )[/tex]

[tex](\frac{-10}{2},\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]

[tex](-5,\frac{1}{2} )[/tex]

Answer:

Main difference between circle & ellipse

Step-by-step explanation:

Circle is a line forming a close loop, all points on the loop line are at equal distance from the centre, that distance is called Radius. Eg : Wheel

Ellipse is also a close loop line, such that distance of locus of all points on the plane to two fixed points (foci) always sum up to same constant. Eg : Orbits of planets

Cricle is the round shape entity in which it contains only radius and double of radius is diameter Thus below explanation is the answer to the Question

Explanation:

Thus we conclude that cricle is totally different from ellipse

To know more about cricle and ellipse

https://brainly.com/question/9689499

Answer:

Study 2 will produce a greater power to detect an effect because it has a lower beta level

Step-by-step explanation:

Generally, alpha level is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's true. Whereas beta level is the opposite and it's the probability of accepting the null hypothesis even though it’s false.

Now, in statistics the lower the alpha level, the more we require a stronger evidence. Thus, a higher alpha level is usually required to produce a stronger evidence.

Now, an increase in alpha level means a decrease in beta level and a decrease in alpha level means an increase in beta level.

This means that the lower the beta level, the greater is the power to detect an effect.

Now, we are told that the beta level in study 1 was larger than the beta level used in Study 2.

Thus, study 2 will produce a greater power to detect an effect because it has a lower beta level

Answer:

ok

Step-by-step explanation:

heres a memeeeee

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{y+3=-(x+2)}\\or\\\boxed{y-3=-(x+8)}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The point-slope form of an equation of a line:

[tex]y-y_1=m(x-x_1)[/tex]

[tex]m=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

Put the coordinates of the given point:

(-2, -3); (-8, 3)

[tex]m=\dfrac{3-(-3)}{-8-(-2)}=\dfrac{3+3}{-8+2}=\dfrac{6}{-6}=-1\\\\\text{for}\ (-2;\ -3)\\\\y-(-3)=-1(x-(-2))\\\\y+3=-(x+2)\\\\\text{for}\ (-8;\ 3)\\\\y-3=-1(x-(-8)\\\\y-3=-(x+8)[/tex]

Answer:

I not see the number 2

I think that is number 2

Answer:

first and last one should be the answer (not sure about the first, cant see it too good)

Answer:

x=7.5 and x=-12.5

Step-by-step explanation:

|2x+5|-4=16

|2x+5|=20

2x+5=20

2x=15

x=7.5

2x+5=-20

2x=-25

x=-12.5

Answer:

17160

Step-by-step explanation:

first there are 13 options

then there are 13 - 1 that was chosen

then there are 13 - 2 that were chosen

then there are 13 - 3 that were chosen

so that's 13 options, then 12 options, then 11 options, and then 10 options

and in order to figure out all of the possibilties we mutiply the options so

13*12*11*10 = 17160

little further explaining of why this works:

we have a set of letters (3 in a set)

A B C

what are the possible combinations?

AB

AC

BC

BA

CA

CB

the answer is 6 which is also 3 * 2 * 1 = 6

HOPE THAT HELPS!1! ^_^

Using the Fundamental Counting Theorem, it is found that there are 28,561 ways in which four cards, each of a different face value, can be chosen.

Fundamental counting theorem:

States that if there are n things, each with [tex]n_1, n_2, …, n_n[/tex] ways to be done, each thing independent of the other, the number of ways they can be done is:

[tex]N = n_1 \times n_2 \times \cdots \times n_n[/tex]

In this problem, four cards are chosen, each with 13 ways, hence [tex]n_1 = n_2 = n_3  = n_4 = 13[/tex], and:

[tex]T = 13 \times 13 \times 13 \times 13 = 13^4 = 28561[/tex]

There are 28,561 ways in which four cards, each of a different face value, can be chosen.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/19022577

Answer:

about 130 marbles

Step-by-step explanation:

round 47 to 50

round 76 to 80

you have about 130 marbles

Answer:

About 100.

Step-by-step explanation:

47+76=123

123 is closer to 100 than to 200.

Answer:

2430

Step-by-step explanation:

The revenue is the amount of money generated by an organization from sales or services made in a specific time. The conclusion from the computation made are:

Given that:

[tex]R = (p - 1)(200 - 40p)[/tex]

To calculate the break even, we set R to 0.

So, we have:

[tex](p - 1)(200 - 40p) =0[/tex]

Split

[tex]p - 1 = 0[/tex] or [tex]200 - 40p = 0[/tex]

Solve for p

[tex]p = 1[/tex] or [tex]40p = 200[/tex]

Divide by 40 in the second equation

[tex]p=1[/tex] or [tex]p =5[/tex]

The break even price is at $1 and $5

To maximize his revenue, we have:

[tex]R = (p - 1)(200 - 40p)[/tex]

Open bracket

[tex]R = 200p - 200 - 40p^2 + 40p[/tex]

Rewrite as:

[tex]R = - 40p^2+ 200p + 40p- 200[/tex]

[tex]R = - 40p^2+ 240p- 200[/tex]

Differentiate

[tex]R' = -80p + 240[/tex]

Equate to 0 and solve for p

[tex]-80p + 240=0[/tex]

[tex]-80p =- 240[/tex]

Divide by -80

[tex]p = 3[/tex]

To maximize his revenue, he as to charge $3

The most money he can make is calculated as:

[tex]R = (p - 1)(200 - 40p)[/tex]

Substitute [tex]p = 3[/tex]

[tex]R = (3 - 1)(200 - 40 \times 3)[/tex]

[tex]R = (3 - 1)(200 - 120)[/tex]

[tex]R = 160[/tex]

The most money he can make is $160

The charges he sold when he made $100 is:

[tex]R = - 40p^2+ 240p- 200[/tex]

Substitute 100 for R

[tex]- 40p^2+ 240p- 200=100[/tex]

Collect like terms

[tex]- 40p^2+ 240p- 200-100=0[/tex]

[tex]- 40p^2+ 240p- 300=0[/tex]

Divide through by -20

[tex]2p^2- 12p+ 15=0[/tex]

Using quadratic formula, the solution of p is:

[tex]p = \frac{-b \± \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac} }{2a}[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]p = \frac{-(-12) \± \sqrt{(-12)^2 - 4\times 2 \times 15} }{2 \times 2}[/tex]

[tex]p = \frac{12 \± \sqrt{24} }{4}[/tex]

[tex]p = \frac{12 \± 4.90 }{4}[/tex]

Split

[tex]p = \frac{12 + 4.90 }{4}\ or p = \frac{12 - 4.90 }{4}[/tex]

[tex]p = \frac{16.90 }{4}\ or\ p = \frac{7.1 }{4}[/tex]

[tex]p = 4.225\ or\ p = 1.775[/tex]

He charged $4.225 or $1.775 to make $100.

Read more about revenue and price at:

https://brainly.com/question/11859895

Answer:

The​ homoskedasticity-only F​-statistic and the​ heteroskedasticity-robust F​-statistic typically​ are different.

Step-by-step explanation:

An F statistic is a value derived by running an ANOVA test or a regression analysis to find out if the means between two populations are significantly different.

The homoskedasticity-only” F-statistic is derived by running two regressions, one under the null hypothesis and one under the alternative hypothesis. If the “unrestricted” model fits sufficiently better, reject the null.

In the first regression, the restricted regression (the null hypothesis) is forced to be true. This is the regression in which all the coefficients are set to zero; the relevant regressors are excluded from the regression. In the second regression, the unrestricted regression, the alternative hypothesis is allowed to be true. If the sum of squared residuals is sufficiently smaller in the unrestricted than the restricted regression, then the test rejects the null hypothesis

The heteroskedasticity-robust F-statistic is built in to STATA (“test” command); this tests all q  restrictions at once.

The homoskedasticity-only F-statistic is important historically (and also in practice), and can  help intuition, but isn’t valid when there is heteroskedasticity

Answer:

Turn it by 90 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Question is too vague sorry if this doesn't help

Answer:

fernanda i have no idea how to do this

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

433.68

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

433.68

Good Luck!!!

Answer:

1.5 > 1.25

Step-by-step explanation:

1.5 is smaller than 1.25

Answer:solution

Step-by-step explanation:

An ordered pair that satisfies all the equations in a linear system of equations is called a: solution of the linear system.

A linear function is a function that has a positive relationship between its variables.

Hence, an increase in one variable (input variable) causes an increase in the other variable (output variable) because the variables are directly proportional.

Mathematically, the graph of a linear function is a straight-line and its slope is always constant.

On a related note, a linear system of equation is an algebraic equation of the first order with two variables and each of its term having an exponent of one.

Generally, a system of linear equations in two variables must have at least two solution.

In conclusion, a solution of the linear system is an ordered pair that satisfies all the equations in a linear system of equations.

Read more: https://brainly.com/question/24085666

Answer:

76.95

Step-by-step explanation:

9.5X8/1(8.1 IS THE NUMBER YOU MULTIPLY IT BY)=76.95

Step-by-step explanation:

Advantages of using measures of dispersion are that it gives us a better idea of the range in which an average was calculated and it is easy to calculate and understand. A disadvantage of using measures of dispersion is that it is a broad measurement because it only shows the maximum and minimum values of data.

Answer:

Ava

Step-by-step explanation:

because we multiply by 3 miles, 50 minutes, 0.83

and you get 124.5

its not maura because if you multiply 5 miles, by 1.25 hours you get 6.25

sorry if wrong! hope this helps!

Answer:

atleast 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

The standard normal distribution is represented by P(-zc < z < zc) = c

From this, you see that -zc is less than the variable of interest z and z is less than zc.

The equation simply means that the probability that -zc is less than z and z is less than zc, is c.

The value zc is NOT a value from the above distribution. All values in the distribution are of the variable z. For example, z might be equal to 1, z might be equal to 6, but the variable of interest in the distribution is z, not zc.

Answer:

If this is basic mathematics its =

Step-by-step explanation:

You won't have to worry about sig figs until chemistry.

Answer:  x ≤ 6

Solution:  -10, -4, 0, 3, 6

Not a solution: 10

Plz mark brainliest:)

The answer to the inequality is [tex]x[/tex] ≤ [tex]6[/tex]

First, you must subtract 17 on both sides

[tex]-2x[/tex] ≥ [tex]-12[/tex]

Then, you must divide -2 on both sides.

[tex]x[/tex] ≥ [tex]6[/tex]

Finally, since x was changed from negative to positive using division, switch the inequality sign.

[tex]x[/tex] ≤ [tex]6[/tex]

Answer:

[tex] \large{3 \times 3 - 2 \times 2}[/tex]

[tex] \large{9 - 4}[/tex]

[tex] \large{5}[/tex]

Answer:

270 degree rotation about point 0 composition .translations of negative 2 units

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Took the test

Answer:

1. The expected pay-out on each policy is 250 * 1/90 + 12000 * 1/100 + 17000 * 1/400 = $165.  So that's what the premium would have to be in order to get a profit of 0.

2. The profit per policy is the premium the company receives minus the expected payout = 350 - 165 = $185.

3. The expected profit on 375 policies would be 375 * 185 = $69375

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

2x = 4-1

2x = 3

x = 3/2

hope it will be helpfull