Helpppppppppppppppp

Answer:

1) 25°

2) 155°

3) 25°

4) 25°

5) 110°

6) 30.5°

7) 41°

Step-by-step explanation:

5) 5x + 15 = 8x - 42,  3x = 57,   x= 19, ∠CDE = 5(19) + 15 = 110°

6) 3x + x + 4 + 70° = 180°,  4x = 106°, x = 26.5°, ∠ABC = 26.5° + 4° = 30.5°

7) 2x + x + 4 + 65° = 180°, 3x = 111°, x = 37°, ∠MNO = 37° + 4° = 41°

Answer:

8cm

Step-by-step explanation:

8×8×8

[tex] {8}^{3} {cm}^{3} [/tex]

Answer:

Answer:

29/12

Step-by-step explanation:

5/6+1/3+1/2+3/4

10/12+4/12+6/12+9/12

14/12+6/12+9/12

20/12+9/12

29/12

Answer:

lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

math kinda sucks. :) Brainliest pls???

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

amoug us

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a) 3

b) 725

c) 12100

d)3900

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

simple logic

Answer with  explanation:

y+1 = 26     ;      y = 26-1 = 25

x-2 = 19           ;    x = 19+ 2 = 21

I hope im roght!!

Answer:

8

888888888888888888888888888

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

It is an arithmetic sequence. The nth term = 499 + n

answer:

number 4

Step-by-step explanation:

24 ? 8×3=24

Answer:

a. ∀ a, b ∈ Z, if a < 0 ∧ b < 0 ⇒ a + b < 0

b. ∀ a, b ∈ Z, if a > 0 ∧ b > 0 ⇒ a - b < 0 ∨ a - b > 0

c. ∀ a, b ∈ Z, a² + b² ≥ (a + b)

d. ∀ a, b ∈ Z, |ab| = |a||b|

Step-by-step explanation:

a. The sum of two negative integers is negative.

First, we take the quantifier ∀ and write the two integers a and b as a element of the set of integers Z as ∀ a, b ∈ Z. Now, if a and b are negative, we write if a < 0 ∧ b < 0 where the logical operator ∧ represents "and". So, we have the statements ∀ a, b ∈ Z, if a < 0 ∧ b < 0. Then finally, we use the logical operator ⇒ to imply the summation of the two integers as ⇒ a + b. And since we are to show that their sum is less than zero, we write ⇒ a + b < 0.

Combining this statement with the previous expressions, we have

∀ a, b ∈ Z, if a < 0 ∧ b < 0 ⇒ a + b < 0

b. The difference of two positive integers is not necessarily positive.

First, we take the quantifier ∀ and write the two integers a and b as a element of the set of integers Z as ∀ a, b ∈ Z. Now, if there exists a and b that are positive, we write if a > 0 ∧ b > 0 where the logical operator ∧ represents "and". So, we have the statements ∀ a, b ∈ Z, a > 0 ∧ b > 0. Then finally, we use the logical operator ⇒ to imply the difference of the two integers as ⇒ a - b. And since we are to show that their difference is either less than zero or greater than zero, we write ⇒ a - b < 0 ∨ a - b > 0 where ∨ implies the logical operator "or".

Combining this statement with the previous expressions, we have

∀ a, b ∈ Z, if a > 0 ∧ b > 0 ⇒ a - b < 0 ∨ a - b > 0

c. The sum of the squares of two integers is greater than or equal to the square of their sum.

First, we take the quantifier ∀ and write the two integers a and b as a element of the set of integers Z as ∀ a, b ∈ Z. Now, since we are dealing with the sum of the squares of each integer, we write a² + b². And, we are to show that this sum is greater than the sum of the individual integers, we write their sum as a + b, and we show the previous sum to be greater than or equal to this as a² + b² ≥ (a + b).

Combining this statement with the previous expressions, we have

∀ a, b ∈ Z, a² + b² ≥ (a + b)

d. The absolute value of the product of two integers is the product of their absolute values.

First, we take the quantifier ∀ and write the two integers a and b as a element of the set of integers Z as ∀ a, b ∈ Z. Now, since we are to show that absolute value of the product of the integers equals the product of the absolute value of the individual integers, we write the that absolute value of the product of the integers as |ab| and the product of the absolute value of the individual integers as |a||b|.

Since we are to show that this expression and the previous expression are equal, we write |ab| = |a||b|.

Combining this statement with the previous expressions, we have

∀ a, b ∈ Z, |ab| = |a||b|

answer:

5 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't know how I got my answer but please try

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

if the function is x the answer is 1 hope it helps

Answer:

700,000

Step-by-step explanation:

55,325 is closer to 100,000 than it is to 0, so the hundred-thousands place would round up.

Answer:

655,325

Step-by-step explanation:

Im pretty sure it would just stay the same because 3 is not enough to bring the 5 up to 6.

x

4

+

50

x

2

+

625Rewrite  

625

as  

25

2

.

u

2

+

50

u

+

25

2

Check the middle term by multiplying  

2

a

b

and compare this result with the middle term in the original expression.

2

a

b

=

2

⋅

u

⋅

25

Simplify.

2

a

b

=

50

u

Factor using the perfect square trinomial rule  

a

2

+

2

a

b

+

b

2

=

(

a

+

b

)

2

, where  

a

=

u

and  

b

=

25

.

(

u

+

25

)

2

Replace all occurrences of  

u

with  

x

2

.

(

x

2

+

25

)

2

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

6=2*y+4

6-4=2*y

2=2*y

y=2/2

y=1

Answer:

y = -7

Step-by-step explanation:

✔️Find the slope (m) using any two pairs of values, say (0, -7) and (2, -7):

Slope (m) = ∆y/∆x = (-7 -(-7))/(2 - 0) = 0/2 = 0

Slope (m) = 0

✔️Find y-intercept (b):

y-intercept is the value of y when x = 0. From the table, when x = 0, y = -7.

Therefore, y-intercept (b) = -7

✔️ Substitute m = 0 and b = -7 into y = mx + b (slope-intercept form):

y = 0(x) + (-7)

y = -7

Answer:

39.4

Step-by-step explanation:

9.85 * (4) = 39.4

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

It actually trying to trick you with a double negative

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Squares do have right angles, if they did not have to then all other ssquares with no right angles would be considered rhombuses.

The question is sking which does not apply, a does not apply but thats what theyre asking so its a

Answer: 1/4 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

The Amount of property taxes you would have to pay per year if the rate was 0.79% is $3,436.50.

If you owned a house and the assessed value was $435,000.00, the amount of property taxes you would have to pay per year

if the rate was 0.79% can be calculated as follows:SolutionTo calculate the amount of property taxes, multiply the assessed value by the tax rate.

We can represent this mathematically as:P = R × Vwhere:P = Property taxesR = Tax rateV = Assessed Value

We are given that:R = 0.79%V = $435,000.00

We need to convert the tax rate to a decimal value before we can use it in our calculation. This can be done by dividing the percentage value by 100. Therefore:R = 0.79 ÷ 100= 0.0079

Using the formula above, we can now calculate the property taxes as:P = R × V= 0.0079 × $435,000.00= $3,436.50

Therefore, the amount of property taxes you would have to pay per year if the rate was 0.79% is $3,436.50.

For more questions on Amount.

https://brainly.com/question/29252044

#SPJ8

Answer:

82.89

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:shift two units to the right

Step-by-step explanation: