The framers of the U.S. Constitution viewed the presidency as an important and powerful office but believed it required checks and balances from other branches of government to limit potential abuses and safeguard the liberties of the American people.
The framers of the U.S. Constitution recognized the need for a strong executive branch, but they also understood the potential dangers of concentrated power. They believed that by establishing a system of checks and balances, with each branch of government having the ability to limit the powers of the others, they could prevent any one branch from becoming too dominant.
The presidency was designed to be an independent and co-equal branch of government, with the power to execute the laws and act as the armed forces commander-in-chief.
To know more about U.S. Constitution, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. Negligence is imposed because the activity involved is so dangerous that there must be full accountability, even if the activity is necessary and cannot be prohibited
The statement "Negligence is imposed because the activity involved is so dangerous that there must be full accountability, even if the activity is necessary and cannot be prohibited" is false.
Negligence simply means lack of care, the failure to meet a desired standard established to protect society from unreasonable risk. Negligence arises where a person is given some kind of liability, it is term often used in tort law. When the key damage is personal or related to property its one of the main component is negligence. Four basic elements of negligence is duty to care, breach, causation, and damages. Negligence arises when their is a damage or harm cause by breach of rules and lack of responsibility and care. A defendant to be liable for negligence must carry some duty towards the plaintiff.
To know more about "Negligence" visit-
brainly.com/question/12177947
#SPJ4
A group of college students create a website that lists creative insults about President Obama.
a. Is this situation Constitutional?
b. What Amendment is?
c. Cite relevant text in Amendment:
No, the situation of a website listing creative Insults about President Obama.Is not indigenous as it violates the principle of respect for public officers and the President's right to privacy and class.
The First Amendment is applicable to this situation, which protects freedom of speech and expression.The First Amendment doesn't cover speech that's intended to harm or defame someone differently. Public officers have a right to privacy and quality that can be violated by similar insults.
Thus, creating such a website would be considered vulnerable speech under the First Amendment. Any attempt to harm or defame public officials isn't defended by the Constitution.
To learn more about First Amendment:
https://brainly.com/question/26448398
#SPJ4
governments can protect consumers from unsafe products by issuing a limit or a ban on such products.
true/false
It is true to say that governments can protect consumers from unsafe products by issuing a limit or a ban on such products.
In the midst of customers' rising dietary enhancement use, which spiked during the Coronavirus pandemic, Congresspersons Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Mike Braun (R-IN) presented bipartisan regulation on April 26 that would give the Food and Medication Organization (FDA) — the government can protect consumers by putting ban on unsafe products — more noteworthy perceivability into the items available. Seat urges Congress to quickly authorize the bill and guarantee the security and nature of all enhancements available.
As per a Seat review, barely any individuals comprehend FDA's momentum restricted job in directing the business. The organization misses the mark on capacity to be aware with assurance what dietary enhancement items are arriving at shoppers and what's in them. Existing regulation puts the onus on FDA to filter reports of damage from purchasers, specialists, and organizations.
To know more about consumer protection,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/27305515
#SPJ4
which of the following was not a primary method by which the american government dealt with american indians during the period of western settlement? group of answer choices relocation appeasement extermination assimilation
During the time of western settlement, appeasement was not the main strategy used by the American government to deal with American Indians.
In a global context, appeasement is a diplomatic strategy that entails giving an aggressive power political, material, or territorial concessions in order to prevent conflict.
The phrase is most frequently used to describe the foreign policy of the British governments under Prime Ministers Ramsay MacDonald (1935–1939), Stanley Baldwin (1935–1937), and (most notably) Neville Chamberlain (1937–1940) towards Nazi Germany (from 1933) and Fascist Italy (from 1922). Under British pressure, France's foreign policy of the era included some appeasement of fascism and nazism, though this was never as popular as it was in the UK.
Learn more about " appeasement " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/11969058
#SPJ4
by law, if you are involved in a collision___O you do not have to stop if no one is injured O you are required to stopO you must call for roadside assistance O report to the nearest hospital
By law, if you are involved in a collision, you are required to stop. You are required by law to stop if you are involved in a collision to ensure that everyone involved is safe and to prevent further accidents or harm.
Stopping after a collision allows you to assess the situation, determine whether anyone is injured, and provide necessary assistance or medical care. It also allows you to exchange information with the other parties involved, such as contact information and insurance details, which is necessary for insurance claims and any legal proceedings that may arise from the collision.
To know more about collision, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13138178
#SPJ4
what 2 countries signed a pact in 1939 why did they make the agreement
Germany and the Soviet Union are the two countries that signed a non-aggression pact in 1939.
On August 1939, Germany and the Soviet Union signed a non-aggression pact, It is also known as the Nazi-Soviet Pact, or the Hitler-Stalin Pact. Both the countries made an agreement that they would not attack each other and secretly divided the countries that lay between them. Germany claimed Western Poland and some portion of Lithuania. The Soviet Union was going to occupy Eastern Poland, the Baltic States and a particular portion of Finland. The pacts were intended to prevent the West or the Soviets from gaining influence in the Baltic states and thus encircling Germany. Sweden, Norway and Finland rejected the proposal. The treaty came into existence to maintain peace and harmony but instead the Pact prepared the way for World War II. The treaty was a huge failure and didn't meet its target.
To know more about "non-aggression pact in 1939" visit-
brainly.com/question/829803
#SPJ4
which branch of the government appoints justices to the u.s. supreme court?
Answer:
The Executive Branch appoints Justices to the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
Members of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President subject to the approval of the Senate.
Hope it helps:)
Which of these early amendments to the Constitution guarantees the government will provide just compensation for private property that it takes?
a. Second
b. Fifth
c. Eighth
d. First
The correct option is B ; Fifth , The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, on the other hand, states that "nor shall private property be seized for public purpose without reasonable compensation.
" As a result, once the United States acquires a property through eminent domain, it has a constitutional obligation to compensate the property owner fairly for the land's fair market worth. The First Amendment guaranteed freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and the right to petition.
According to the Fifth Amendment, no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law." The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, passed in 1868, employs the same eleven words to express a legal requirement of all states.
Learn more about Amendment
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
when presented with evidence of discrimination, an employer in a disparate impact case needs to show that the employment practice is a(n) blank . multiple choice question. unrelated to the way the company does business subjective measure of evaluation unintentional mistake business necessity
when presented with evidence of discrimination, an employer in a disparate impact case needs to show that the employment practice is a business necessity.
Business necessity is used to justify an employers employment criteria in a company which disproportionately affects a group of individuals. The justification implies that the company has legitimate reasons to operate under such barred employment environment. It substantially affects employers need in the company and work assigned to him. Every business has different position of employment and each position is differentiated in need and skill of the employees, the employees have to set according to the business and its needs so that business can grow significantly.
To know more about "Business necessity" visit-
brainly.com/question/16944534
#SPJ4
A skier broke his leg when he was knocked down by the chair lift as he tried to avoid other skiers who had fallen off while disembarking. The ski resort employee operating the lift had not been paying attention and had failed to stop the lift. Ski patrol personnel placed the skier on a stretcher, which they then hooked up to a snowmobile to bring him down the mountain. The route down ran along the edge of a ski trail. Midway down, a novice snowboarder tried to see how close he could come to the stretcher without hitting it, but he lost control and landed on top of the skier's leg, damaging it further. The skier filed a lawsuit against the snowboarder and the resort in a jurisdiction that has adopted a comparative contribution system in joint and several liability cases. At trial, the skier's physician testified that the skier's leg was permanently disabled, but that neither injury, by itself, would have caused the permanent disability and it was impossible to quantify how much each injury contributed to the disability. The jury determined that the damages from the permanent disability equaled $2 million, and that the snowboarder and the resort were each 50% at fault.
What amount of damages can the skier recover from the snowboarder for his permanent disability?
$2 million was chosen because it was impossible to determine how much of the damage the snowboarder was responsible for.
Due to the snowboarder's joint and several liability for the injury, the skier may recover $2 million from the snowboarder. According to the doctrine of joint and several liability, each defendant will be held jointly and severally liable for any harm that the plaintiff suffers as a result of two or more tortious acts acting together to cause. This means that the plaintiff may seek payment from any defendant for the full amount of his damages. The doctrine holds true even when each tortfeasor took different steps and acted on their own. Here, the skier's right to reasonable care was violated by both the snowboarder and a resort employee.
The skier's disability was actually caused by both of the tortfeasors' actions because without either of them, his leg would not have become permanently disabled. Because the disability was a direct result of the snowboarder's act, that act was the proximate cause of the skier's disability. The extent of the harm was unpredictable, so it doesn't matter; the tortfeasor must treat the victim as he finds him. The skier can therefore sue the snowboarder for the full $2 million.
Learn more about " snowboarder's " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/149121
#SPJ4
Complete Question -
What amount of damages can the skier recover from the snowboarder for his permanent disability?
A $1 million, because the jurisdiction follows comparative contribution rules.
B $2 million, because it was not possible to identify the portion of the injury that the snowboarder caused.
C Nothing for his permanent disability, because the skier has not met his burden of proof as to the amount of damages that the snowboarder caused.
D Nothing for his permanent disability, because the injury inflicted by the snowboarder, by itself, would not have caused the disability.
What is the meaning of this Article 19 under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression?
Article 19 under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression means to the freedom of the share the opinion as the without interference.
What is Article 19?During the period December 10th, 1948 was the 70th years ago was the established the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The main motive to the share the opinion as the freedom of the speech and expression of the everyone right.
According to the Article 19 under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was to declare the freedom of the speech and expression are the everyone right to the freedom to the share opinion specially media. Because fourth pillar of the Democracy.
As a result, the significance of the Article 19 are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on Article 19, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28670413
#SPJ1
what is the 10 amendment simplified
The 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the Bill of Rights and it states that any powers that are not specifically granted to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people.
In layman's terms, the 10th Amendment asserts that the federal government has only the powers delegated to it by the Constitution, and that all other powers belong to the states and the people. This helps to ensure that the federal government does not grow overly powerful and that individual states can make judgements on specific issues.
For such more question on Constitution:
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
What is the evidence for and against the theory that Arthur Leigh Allen was the Zodiac killer?
The case of the Zodiac Killer, a serial killer roaming around Northern California in the 1960s and 70s is still an unsolved mystery where the prime suspect was Arthur Leigh Allen.
There are a number of evidence that are for and against Arthur Leigh Allen.
The killer used to often communicate with the police. The letters were written through a Royal typewriter, with the elite type. The same typewriter was found in possession of Allen.
There was a type of bomb that the killer talked about in his letters. A sketch of a similar kind of bomb was found at Allen's residence.
A victim and survivor of Zodiac killer had identified Allen in a lineup.
A DNA print that was found in one of the letters, did not match Allen's.
Allen's handwriting did not match that of the serial killer's.
To know more about the Zodiac Killer visit
https://brainly.com/question/29318851
#SPJ4
a pedestrian called the police to report suspicious activity and a possible drug deal occurring in a vehicle under a bridge. when the police arrived, they found only an abandoned vehicle. the vehicle had current registration tags, but from the flat tires and condition of the windshield, it appeared that the ve
The questions seems to be incomplete. I have gone ahead to explain what could be seen as suspicious activity in the society
What are suspicious activities?Suspicious activities refer to behaviors or actions that are deemed unusual, deviant, or potentially criminal in nature. These activities may be observed or reported by individuals and could include things like unusual purchases, unattended packages, strange behavior or appearance, loitering, or attempts to gain access to restricted areas. Suspicious activities may raise concerns for public safety or security
Read more on suspicious activities https://brainly.com/question/26974108
#SPJ1
Political campaign rhetoric is protected speech under the First Amendment. Which of the following is a good definition of political campaign rhetoric?
A. Style of speaking or writing that is intended to sell people that may embellish and may not be honest.
B. Style of speaking or writing that is intended to sell people without embellishment and be honest.
C. Method of citing case studies without embellishment.
D. The story of a campaign that is based on honest statements.
E. None of these answers are correct.
The correct option is option A
A good definition of political campaign rhetoric is: Style of speaking or writing that is intended to sell people that may embellish and may not be honest.
Option A captures the basic nature of political campaign rhetoric, which frequently incorporates compelling words that may or may not be entirely true. It is not, however, restricted to speech and can incorporate other means of communication.
Option B is not an accurate definition because political campaign language is frequently embellished and may not always be totally truthful.
Option C is an incorrect definition since political campaign rhetoric is more concerned with selling ideas or candidates than with citing case studies.
Option D is similarly incorrect, because political campaign rhetoric is frequently based on subjective or incomplete information rather than entirely honest assertions.
For such more question on political:
https://brainly.com/question/2507057
#SPJ4
Which clause states that the federal laws have greater weight than state laws?
The supremacy clause states that the federal laws have greater weight than state laws.
The Supremacy Clause is present is Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution. It declares that federal law, including the constitution, supersedes state legislation and even state constitutions.
States are forbidden from interfering with how the federal government exercises its constitutional authority or from taking on any duties that belong solely to the federal government.
However, it does not give the federal government the ability to examine or veto state legislation prior to their implementation.
The Supremacy Clause solely concerns the legal status of the laws that other provisions of the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact, as well as the legal status of treaties and the Constitution itself.
To know more about the Supremacy clause, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13839329
#SPJ4
Summarize the events that happened in New Jersey vs TLO. Include how it started and then how it ultimately ended.
Answer:
In a juvenile court, T.L.O. argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used.
Explanation:
What are 3 sentences using bias?
Out of the choices provided above, the sentences that use bias are given as under,
Reporters must be impartial and not show political biasThere has always been a slight bias in favor of/towards employing liberal arts graduates in the company.There was clear evidence of a strong bias against her.Therefore, the options B, C, and D hold true.
A bias can be referred to or taken into general understanding as a social concept wherein an individual or a group is discriminated owing to a partial behavior against themselves. The condition of bias is to be understood as the one wherein the things go either in their favor, or against their will due to a particular position that they hold.
Learn more about bias here:
https://brainly.com/question/15135672
#SPJ4
Complete question
What are 3 sentences using bias?
Options
A. The senator has accused the media of bias.
B. Reporters must be impartial and not show political bias.
C. There was clear evidence of a strong bias against her.
D. There has always been a slight bias in favour of/towards employing liberal arts graduates in the company.
question 14a. the law of independent assortment states that alleles of different genes assort independently during gamete formation. this law is carried out during
The law of autonomous assortment states that during gamete formation, alleles from various genes assort separately. This law comes into play during meiosis.
Meiosis involves a diverse group of cells. During the procedure, these divided, haploid chromosomes were produced. Grasp the law of autonomous assortment requires an understanding of the rule of segregation. This gives various gamete cells access to two unique genes. Mendel's independent assortment law states that the alleles of two or more distinct genes are independently selected into gametes. In other words, the allele for one gene does not change in a gamete when it acquires an allele for another gene.
To learn more about meiosis, click at:
https://brainly.com/question/3565757
#SPJ4
which of the following would be commonly reported in the summary of significant accounting policies note? group of answer choices errors and fraud method used to record depreciation subsequent events related-party transactions
the method of recording depreciation that is typically noted in the summary of material accounting policies note
The summary of significant accounting policies provides details on significant accounting practises, such as revenue recognition, depreciation methods, and inventory costing. A wide range of operational and financial policies, such as those pertaining to cash, receivables, intangible assets, asset impairment, inventory valuation, different types of liabilities, revenue recognition, and capitalised costs, may be included in the policy summary. The reporting entity should disclose material accounting principles used. Such disclosure should list and explain the accounting principles that have a significant impact on how financial position, operational results, or cash flow changes are determined.
Learn more about " accounting policies " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/24215375
#SPJ4
the function of business that acquires and manages funds within a firm is ___
The function of business that acquires and manages funds within a firm is commonly referred to as "finance".
Finance is the study and management of money, investments, and other financial instruments. Finance is an important function for individuals, businesses, and governments, as it helps them to make informed decisions about their financial resources and to manage financial risks.
The function is responsible for making financial decisions that help the company achieve its goals and objectives.
This includes tasks such as financial planning, budgeting, investing, managing cash flow, risk management, tax management, cost control, financial reporting, internal control and raising capital. The finance function also helps to manage financial risks and ensure that the company remains financially stable and profitable.
To know more about finance here:
https://brainly.com/question/10024737
#SPJ4
To determine whether a classification violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the lowest standard of review is known as the ____ test.
a. intermediate scrutiny
b. suspect classification
c. strict scrutiny
d. rational-basis
The correct option is Option D
Rational-basis test is the lowest standard of review used to determine whether a classification violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
In the United States, rational basis review is the standard of review that courts use when evaluating constitutional issues, such as due process or equal protection challenges under the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendments.
Laws that affect people based on their race, for example, are subject to stringent scrutiny and must be justified by the government with solid reasons.
Constitution was replaced the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution, in 1789. It began with seven articles that set the national framework and government constraints.
For such more question on Rational-basis:
https://brainly.com/question/27880846
#SPJ4
What is New England law known for?
Few aspects New England law is particularly known for are historical significance, excellence in legal education, public interest law, maritime law, constitutional law, etc.
New England is known for having several prestigious law schools and a strong legal tradition.
1. Historical significance: New England is home to some of the oldest law schools in the United States, including Harvard Law School, which was founded in 1817.
Many of these institutions have played important roles in the development of American jurisprudence.
2. Excellence in legal education: New England law schools are known for providing high-quality legal education, often with a strong emphasis on practical training.
3. Public interest law: Many New England law schools have a strong commitment to public interest law and social justice.
4. Maritime law: Due to the region's history and geography, New England has a strong tradition in maritime law.
5. Constitutional law: New England has a long history of producing legal scholars and practitioners who specialize in constitutional law.
This is due in part to the region's connection to some of the most important constitutional debates in American history, such as the drafting of the U.S. Constitution in Philadelphia and the adoption of the Bill of Rights.
To know more about New England here:
https://brainly.com/question/28186334
#SPJ4
Which of the following is the key difference between conditions subsequent and conditions precedent?
A. timing of the duty to perform
B. number of parties involved in a contract
C. duration of performance
D. quality of performance
E. divisibility of contract
Timing of the duty to perform is the key difference between conditions subsequent and conditions precedent.
Hence, the correct option is A.
A condition precedent is an event or circumstance that must occur before a party is required to perform its obligations under a contract. In other words, the duty to perform is triggered by the occurrence of the condition precedent.
A condition subsequent, on the other hand, is an event or circumstance that terminates a party's obligations under a contract. In this case, the duty to perform exists until the occurrence of the condition subsequent, at which point it is terminated.
Therefore, the key difference between conditions subsequent and conditions precedent is the timing of the duty to perform. With a condition precedent, the duty to perform arises after the occurrence of the condition, while with a condition subsequent, the duty to perform exists until the occurrence of the condition.
To know more about conditions precedent here:
https://brainly.com/question/13841165
#SPJ4
which clause states that the federal laws have greater weight than state laws?
The clause that states that the federal laws have greater weight than state laws is the Supremacy Clause. This clause is the Constitution's one of the most significant structural provision.
This clause states that the Constitution shall be the supreme law of the United States of America and shall supersede any statute, state laws or regulations when there is a conflict between the two.
However, if any law says that the State must comply with it and that no other law be it federal laws cannot supersede them then that law must be complied with as it says. Till this day, the Supreme Court relies heftily on this clause in deciding cases with conflict.
To know more about Supremacy Clause
https://brainly.com/question/13839329?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Drag and drop the appropriate words to complete the following:Something of legally sufficient value may consist of the performance of an action that one is otherwise not obligated to undertake. Something of legally sufficient value may consist of the refraining from an action that one has a legal right to undertake (called a forbearance).1. obligated2. refraining
The answer to the statement "Drag and drop the appropriate words to complete the following: Something of legally sufficient value may consist of the performance of an action that one is otherwise not obligated to undertake. Something of legally sufficient value may consist of the refraining from an action that one has a legal right to undertake (called a forbearance)."
The term obligation refers to the responsibility to do or not do 3something. Obligation is a civil law notion in its legal sense. An obligation can be formed willingly, such as by a contract, quasi-contract, or unilateral pledge.
Nowadays, it also denotes that one or more parties(obligates) are obligated to execute or refrain from undertaking specified behavior (prestation).
In the legal meaning, abstain is to stop from doing, experiencing, or indulging in anything, especially from acting on a momentary inclination. It also includes preventing someone from doing any act or doing anything in order to carry out such an instruction.
To know more about contract
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ4
The directors and officers of Sports Color, Inc., vote to refuse to declare a dividend. The shareholders can:a. overrule the directors and vote to declare a dividend themselves.b. file an action to require the directors to declare a dividend.c. return treasury shares in exchange for a dividend.d. demand that a court declare a dividend.
In the above situation, it can be seen that the shareholders can file an action that would require the directors to make the declaration of a dividend, in case they refuse to declare a dividend. Therefore, the option B holds true.
A dividend may be considered as the part of return that the shareholders get as a part of their faith and investment shown in the company over a regular course of business operations of the companies. The declaration of dividend lies in the hands of the directors, however, the shareholders also have powers because of the ownership that they hold in that company.
Learn more about dividend here:
https://brainly.com/question/29510262
#SPJ4
which of the following did Jefferson include in the Declaration of Independence in order to convince the colonists and their European powers to break with Great Britain was both necessary and Justified?
a list of grievances against King George the Third
Jefferson included a) a. list of grievances against King George the Third in the Declaration of Independence in order to convince the colonists and their European powers to break with Great Britain
To persuade the colonies and European powers of the legitimacy of the American fight for independence, Thomas Jefferson included a list of grievances against King George III and the British government in the Declaration of Independence. The list of complaints was meant to show how the colonists' natural rights, such as their right to life, liberty, and property, had been frequently violated by the British authority. The complaints included, among other things, concerns about taxation without representation, infringements on the right to a jury trial, and housing soldiers in private residences.
Jefferson outlined these complaints in an effort to demonstrate that the American colonies had exhausted all possibilities for a peaceful settlement with Britain and that independence was required to safeguard their rights and liberties. The United States eventually won the Revolutionary War, and Great Britain and other European nations recognised its independence as a result. The Declaration of Independence was a potent statement that helped galvanise support for the American cause both within the colonies and overseas.
Complete Question:
Which of the following did Jefferson include in the Declaration of Independence in order to convince the colonists and their European powers to break with Great Britain was both necessary and Justified?
a) a list of grievances against King George the Third
b) The basic components of a constitution are the system
c) The Preamble to the Constitution
d) Mission of the government
Read more about the Declaration of Independence on:
https://brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ4
The ________ of a country specifies the rules that regulate political, social, and business activities so a society can pursue economic and social development and resolve disputes without collapsing into anarchy.O political systemO philosophical orientationO political philosophyO legal system
The Legal system of a country specifies the rules that regulate political, social, and business activities so a society can pursue economic and social development and resolve disputes without collapsing into anarchy.
The correct option is D.
A method or process for enforcing and interpreting the law is known as a legal system.
Some nations with dual systems exist. Such a system is governed by religious laws, and family law cases like marriage and divorce are decided by religious tribunals.
The more expansive areas of public and commercial law, however, are covered by a secular system with state courts. This still holds true in Israel, India, and Pakistan as it did in England until the 1850s.
The percentage of human activity in these dual jurisdictions that is governed by one system or the other may vary depending on the country's level of political and economic development.
To know more about legal systems, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1894269
#SPJ4
what caused george mason to refuse to sign the draft constitution
Answer: As a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, Mason refused to sign the Constitution and lobbied against its ratification in his home state, believing the document as drafted gave too much power to a central government and was incomplete absent a bill of rights to guarantee individual liberty.
Explanation: i smort