The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that the "war on drugs" had led to mass incarceration through racial profiling, laws and practices governing searches and seizures, excessive pretrial detention.
The goal of the global effort known as "the war on drugs," which is being spearheaded by the US government, is to lessen the illegal drug trade in the US through drug prohibition, military assistance, and military involvement.
President Nixon's emphasis on tackling various forms of substance misuse was probably influenced by the surge in recreational drug usage in the 1960s. Nixon expanded federal financing for drug-control organizations as part of the War on Drugs effort and suggested tough measures, like mandatory prison sentences, for drug offences.
Thus, The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that the "war on drugs" had led to mass incarceration.
For more information about War on Drugs, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29638141
#SPJ1
please help
How did the printing press help spread knowledge and ideas throughout Europe?
A. The printing press led to a new way to make clothing.
B. The printing press led to the creation of other scientific inventions.
C. The printing press translated books into many different languages.
D. The printing press created more copies of books for people to read.
The printing press help spread knowledge and ideas throughout Europe as its created more copies of books for people to read. The Option D.
How did the printing press help spread knowledge?Before the invention of the printing press, books were hand-copied, making them expensive and rare. With printing press, books could be produced much more quickly and at a lower cost which allows for a wider distribution of knowledge and ideas.
This led to an increase in literacy rates and the spread of new ideas across Europe. The printing press played a significant role in the development of the Renaissance and the Reformation because it allowed for the dissemination of scientific discoveries and religious texts to a wider audience.
Read more about printing press
brainly.com/question/22177437
#SPJ1
Operation rolling thunder a
Answer: It was to impress hanoi, with americas determination
Explanation: Vietnam war
please help me with history i’ll give you brainlist!
While South Vietnam was free and North Vietnam was ruled by the Soviet Union when Emperor Bao Dai proclaimed Vietnam's independence in 1945, many Vietnamese felt that Vietnam was not truly independent. As a result, option (A) is correct.
The Bolsheviks overthrew the Soviet Union Russian Provisional Government that had been established earlier that year as a result of the February Revolution and Tsar Nicholas II's resignation, bringing an end to the Russian Empire, and this event served as the nation's founding event.
The Russian Socialist Federative Vietnam Soviet Republic (RSFSR), the first socialist state in the world with constitutional protection, was founded after the coup by the Bolsheviks under Vladimir Lenin.
Learn more about Soviet Union, from :
brainly.com/question/10173240
#SPJ1
what was the us population in1945?
what happens at night but not in day? The book night chapter two
But as darkness falls, Madame Schächter awakens everyone once more with her screams, and once more she is beaten into silence. When it enters a bar-wire-enclosed area at midnight, the train enters the area slowly.
Everybody can see the chimneys of the massive furnaces through the windows. They quickly learn that the awful but vague odour in the air is the smell of burning human flesh. The Auschwitz arrivals processing facility, Birkenau, is this concentration camp.
In Night, Wiesel expresses worry about how seeing inhumane violence might rob even victims of their moral and human sense. brutality fosters brutality, and the Nazis' treatment of Jews as less than human encourages Jewish behavior that is also subhuman. Madame Schächter, however, disturbs everyone once again when night falls with her screams, and once more she is beaten into quiet.
Learn more about novels here:
https://brainly.com/question/9351006
#SPJ1
2. Aaron Rodgers is a quarterback who had
a Y/A of 7.7 in the 2021 season. This means
that he
OC
Aaron Rodgers, a quarterback, had a Y/A (yards per attempt) of 7.7 in the 2021 season. This means that for every pass attempt he made during the season, he gained an average of 7.7 yards.
Y/A is a statistic used to evaluate the performance of a quarterback, and a higher Y/A generally indicates a more efficient passing game. Therefore, Rodgers' Y/A of 7.7 in the 2021 season suggests that he had a relatively efficient passing game compared to other quarterbacks in the league.
Therefore, Aaron Rodgers, a quarterback, had a Y/A (yards per attempt) of 7.7 in the 2021 season. This means that for every pass attempt he made during the season, he gained an average of 7.7 yards.
Learn more about quarterback, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31182053
#SPJ1
what is the importance of vigilance towards western powers?
Vigilance towards Western powers is of significant importance due to historical contexts, power dynamics, and the need to protect national sovereignty and interests.
Western powers, historically characterized by colonialism and imperialism, have exerted influence and often pursued their interests at the expense of other nations.
Maintaining vigilance helps ensure that Western powers do not infringe upon the sovereignty of other nations or exploit their resources and people. It allows for a critical assessment of their actions and policies to safeguard against potential manipulation or neo-colonial practices.
Vigilance also encourages a balanced approach to international relations, fostering a sense of autonomy and self-determination. By monitoring the activities of Western powers, nations can protect their cultural heritage, economic systems, and political independence.
Furthermore, vigilance towards Western powers promotes fairness and equality in global affairs. It discourages any attempts to establish hegemony or dominate international institutions, encouraging a multipolar world order that respects the rights and aspirations of all nations.
Ultimately, remaining vigilant towards Western powers serves as a defense mechanism to safeguard national interests, promote self-determination, and prevent the recurrence of past injustices. It encourages a balanced and equitable approach to international relations, fostering a more harmonious and cooperative global community.
For more such information on: Western powers
https://brainly.com/question/8642038
#SPJ11
¿Cual es la diferencia entre una concesión y un enclave estratégico ?
A concession and a strategic enclave are two different concepts with distinct meanings.
A concession refers to a territory or land that is given up by one country or party to another, often as a result of a treaty or agreement.
The receiving country or party is granted specific rights or privileges to operate in the territory.
For example, a country may grant a foreign company the right to extract natural resources from a particular area in exchange for financial compensation.
On the other hand, a strategic enclave refers to a small territory that is controlled by one country within the borders of another country. It is often established for strategic or military purposes.
Learn more about concession here :
brainly.com/question/10396071
#SPJ1
who are the beneficiaries of racism of both south Africa and Germany
In South Africa during the era of apartheid, white South Africans were the beneficiaries of institutionalized racism. Similarly, in Nazi Germany, the Aryan race was held up as superior to all others.
The apartheid system in South Africa was designed to maintain white supremacy and protect the interests of the white minority. In Nazi Germany the Jews, Roma people, homosexuals, and other groups were targeted for persecution, discrimination, and ultimately, genocide.
The racism harms not only its direct targets but also society as a whole. It perpetuates inequality and division, undermines social cohesion.
Learn more about racism here:
https://brainly.com/question/2864094
#SPJ1
the decision to allow the 1854 elections to determing the status of slavery in kansas and nebraska resulted in: A. proslavery and antislavery groups fighting to influence the elections. B. abolitionists encouraging uprisings of enslaved people throughout the territories. C. the supreme court legalizing slavery throughout the united states. D. southern leaders refusing to acknowlegde kansas or nebraska as states.
The decision to allow the 1854 elections to determine the status of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska resulted in proslavery and antislavery groups fighting to influence the elections. Option A
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 essentially repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had prohibited slavery in the territories north of the 36°30' latitude line.
This decision allowed for the possibility of slavery expanding into new territories, and both proslavery and antislavery groups saw the importance of influencing the elections in order to either secure or prevent the expansion of slavery.
The proslavery groups, which were largely composed of southern Democrats, saw the Kansas-Nebraska Act as an opportunity to expand the institution of slavery and strengthen their power in Congress.
They sent thousands of proslavery settlers into Kansas to vote in the elections and ensure that slavery would be allowed in the territory. The antislavery groups, on the other hand, saw the expansion of slavery as a threat to their values and fought to prevent it.
They encouraged northerners to move to Kansas and vote against slavery, leading to clashes and violence between the two groups.
The decision to allow the 1854 elections to determine the status of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska did not result in abolitionists encouraging uprisings of enslaved people throughout the territories. Additionally, it did not result in the Supreme Court legalizing slavery throughout the United States.
However, southern leaders did refuse to acknowledge Kansas or Nebraska as states, as they were perceived as being sympathetic to the abolitionist cause.
Overall, the decision to allow the 1854 elections to determine the status of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska had significant political and social implications.
It further intensified the sectional tensions between the North and South, and set the stage for the eventual outbreak of the Civil War. So Option A is correct.
For more question on antislavery visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29418929
#SPJ11