I need help asap I will give you brainilest

Which is an example of a secondary source?

A. a newspaper from the day of the event.
B. a documentary created by people who did not observe the event.
C. a journal entry created by someone who observed the event.
D. a letter written by someone who did not observe the event.

The correct answer is True.

Explanation

Title VI is a part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (a national law of the United States) that protects people from discrimination based on their race, color, or national origin, in programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance. . Extended care facilities. This title provides people with a wide variety of services such as Public Assistance Programs, nursing homes, adoption agencies, hospitals, daycare centers, psychiatric services, medical services, among others. According to the above, the correct answer is True, because the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects other rights such as the right to vote of the African American population in other titles.

Answer:

B. It allowed them to overthrow communist governments in favor of

more democratic leaders.

Because the only way (back then) to process and make sugar farms was through manual labor. Since the Americans didn't want to put effort onto their own sugar farms, Africans were forced to do the labor part for them.

Answer: B. A temporary commission was created to investigate the crime.

Explanation: I took the test.

The event that resulted from the as-sas-sination of President John F. Kennedy was  B. A temporary commission was created to investigate the crime.

This refers to the kill-ing of a politician or a head of state that is usually politically motivated.

Hence, we can see that after the ill-fated kil-ling of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, there was a panel set up to investigate the crime and whether the sho-oter acted alone.

Read more about John Kennedy here:

https://brainly.com/question/11133250

#SPJ6

Answer:

I don't understand your question

Answer:

kukkkkkkkkkkkkkhjkhkjhkjhkhjkjhk

Explanation:

ukyhkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuufffffffffffffffffffffyyyyuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuccccccccccccjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

Answer:

the conflict or main idea is not alot of kids have schools with the material they need or are closer to them instead they have to face obstacles or challenges.

Answer:

please mark as brainliest answer as it will also give you 3 pts

Explanation:

trench warfare, warfare in which opposing armed forces attack, counterattack, and defend from relatively permanent systems of trenches dug into the ground. The opposing systems of trenches are usually close to one another. Trench warfare is resorted to when the superior firepower of the defense compels the opposing forces to “dig in” so extensively as to sacrifice their mobility in order to gain protection

A trench system may begin simply as a collection of foxholes hastily dug by troops using their entrenching tools. These holes may subsequently be deepened so that a soldier can safely stand up in one of them, and the individual foxholes may be connected by shallow crawl trenches. From this beginning a system of more permanent field fortifications may be constructed. In making a trench, soil from the excavation is used to create raised parapets running both in front of and behind the trench. Within the trench are firing positions along a raised forward step called a fire step, and duckboards are placed on the often muddy bottom of the trench to provide secure footing.

Trench warfare reached its highest development on the Western Front during World War I (1914–18), when armies of millions of men faced each other in a line of trenches extending from the Belgian coast through northeastern France to Switzerland. These trenches arose within the first few months of the war’s outbreak, after the great offensives launched by Germany and France had shattered against the deadly, withering fire of the machine gun and the rapid-firing artillery piece. The sheer quantity of bullets and shells flying through the air in the battle conditions of that war compelled soldiers to burrow into the soil to obtain shelter and survive

Answer:

India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.

Which event brought the United States out of the Great Depression?

O The Dust Bowl

O World War I

O The Roaring Twenties

Answer:

Cotton farms became more efficient by using advanced equipment.

Answer:

A) Cotton farms became more efficient by using advanced equipment.

Explanation:

Answer: The correct answer would be B - it affected European arts and culture for thousands of years. While the Hellenistic civilization itself did eventually extinguish in the form that existed at the time, Romans drew inspiration and knowledge from their civilization for a lot of things and for an extended period

Explanation:

(B.) It affected European arts and culture for thousands of years.

I got a 100%, trust me :)

Answer:

I’m sorry I just need points right now I don’t know the answer

Explanation:

Answer:

It allows people to vote to accept or reject a law.

Explanation:

edg 2021

Answer:

Good things he did: He established a national energy policy that included conservation, price control, and new technology. In foreign affairs, Carter pursued the Camp David Accords, the Panama Canal Treaties, the second round of Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT II), and the return of the Panama Canal Zone to Panama.

The Greatest Success: The Camp David Accords would become Carter's greatest foreign policy achievement.

Answer:

They were willing to pay more because the purchase allowed them to have more land in order to build the railroad.

Answer:

The Paris Peace Accords of January 1973 saw all U.S. forces withdrawn; the Case–Church Amendment, passed by the U.S. Congress on 15 August 1973, officially ended direct U.S. military involvement. The Peace Accords were broken almost immediately, and fighting continued for two more years.

Explanation:

Answer:

razor-razorblade model

Explanation:

Condeong the scenario described in the question above, the right answer is "Razor-Razorblade Model"

The Razor-Razorblade model is sometimes referred to as the razor and blades business model. It is a form of pricing technique employed by producers whereby a dependent commodity is sold at a loss to the producer while the paired consumable good is sold for higher profits.

The purpose of using this pricing technique is to draw the customers closer with a dependent good which is cheaper. Then, making the expected profit from the commentary goods that essential to the dependent good.

Answer:

The river NILE made the land fertile through the regions it passed. As we know, Egypt is mostly desert but regions near NILE are good for growing crops.

Mesopotamia also relied on rivers to provide for fertile land, major transportation routes, drinking water and for agricultural purposes.

hope it helps

have a nice day

Answer:

B) in all likelihood not an unmusical person

Answer:

B In all likelihood not an unmusical person

Explanation:

Beethoven was a great musician. He was deaf yet he pursued music as a career. He was originally from Germany but he took an interest in western arts.

Please mark me as brainliest.

*Leader's often seize power by illegitimate means.

*A single leader or a powerful group rules.

*Leader's refuse to tolerate dissenting views

The actions that characterize an authoritarian government are:

The democratic government system contributes to the development of a more just and egalitarian society, as sovereignty comes from the people, as the population has an active voice to contribute to the decision-making of a country, either indirectly or directly.

Therefore, authoritarianism is a more rigid and closed regime, which can generate internal and external conflicts for a country.

Find out more about democracy here:

https://brainly.com/question/3710021

Answer:

la respuesta está debajo

Explanation:

adjetivo

en relación con o denotando la parte posterior de la Edad de Piedra, cuando prevalecían las armas e instrumentos de piedra pulida o pulida.

"dentro del fuerte hay un hermoso túmulo neolítico largo"

sustantivo

la última parte de la Edad de Piedra, cuando prevalecían las armas e instrumentos de piedra pulida o pulida.

"la ocupación más temprana parece haber sido en el Neolítico"

ôi đã được hỏi trong các ý kiến \u200b\u200bmột câu hỏi rất thú vị về việc đảng Cộng hòa khác với đảng Dân chủ như thế nào. Đương nhiên, các nhà bình luận ngay lập tức được tìm thấy, người tuyên bố rằng tất cả là một và giống nhau, trong khi những người khác mâu thuẫn với họ. Thực tế là cả hai đều đúng, bởi vì nếu bạn nhìn vào Đảng Dân chủ và Cộng hòa theo quan điểm của một người nước ngoài, nếu bạn sống ở một quốc gia khác, không phải ở Hoa Kỳ, thì, đối với bạn, họ không khác, bởi vì bên ngoài họ có chính sách gần như giống nhau.

Những gì chúng ta đã thấy dưới thời Clinton, Bush, những gì chúng ta thấy dưới thời Obama - về nguyên tắc, chính sách đối ngoại cũng tương tự. Nhưng chính sách đối nội rất khác nhau, vì vậy đối với người Mỹ, có một sự khác biệt lớn giữa Đảng Cộng hòa và Dân chủ. Và hôm nay tôi sẽ nói về sự khác biệt này.

Tôi sẽ bắt đầu với những thứ hời hợt. Như nhiều người có thể biết, đảng Dân chủ tự do hơn, còn đảng Cộng hòa thì bảo thủ hơn. Nó được thể hiện như thế nào: Đảng Dân chủ tin rằng thời gian đang chuyển động, và đất nước, chính trị, con người nên phát triển, vì vậy Đảng Dân chủ ủng hộ nhiều điều mà đảng Cộng hòa không ủng hộ. Ví dụ như phá thai, hôn nhân đồng giới, quy định về vũ khí. Đổi lại, lý tưởng của những người Cộng hòa là nước Mỹ của những người sáng lập. Như đã được họ để lại, đất nước nên được phát triển. Do đó, đảng Cộng hòa ủng hộ nhiều hơn các giá trị lịch sử, bảo thủ hơn; hầu hết trong số họ chống phá thai, hôn nhân đồng giới; chống lại quy định của vũ khí. Đây là một cái nhìn hời hợt về Đảng Dân chủ và Cộng hòa và chính trị trong nước của họ.

Đảng Dân chủ dựa vào chính phủ và nói rằng nên chăm sóc người dân. Do đó, họ chỉ trích đảng Dân chủ và Obama vì đã phát triển chủ nghĩa xã hội và bình đẳng ở Hoa Kỳ. Và đảng Cộng hòa dựa vào mọi người và tin rằng mỗi người nên tự chăm sóc bản thân mình, rằng nhà nước nên cho phép mỗi người độc lập đạt được những gì mình muốn. Nếu bạn có sự kiên trì, thông minh, kỹ năng, thì bạn sẽ đạt được điều gì đó, nhưng nếu bạn không có nó, thì bạn sẽ sống kém. Đó là sự khác biệt lớn giữa hai lực lượng này.

Do đó, quan điểm về thuế: Đảng Dân chủ cho rằng cần phải tăng thuế cho người giàu và giảm cho người nghèo, nghĩa là cho người nghèo sống nhờ người giàu. Đảng Cộng hòa nói rằng thuế nên giống nhau cho tất cả mọi người, bởi vì tất cả mọi người đều bình đẳng; người giàu đã tự mình đạt được điều gì đó, người nghèo không đạt được điều gì vì bản thân mình.

Đảng Dân chủ cũng tin rằng nhà nước nên tăng mức lương tối thiểu, và đảng Cộng hòa chống lại điều đó, vì họ nói rằng điều đó sẽ can thiệp vào các doanh nghiệp nhỏ. Nếu nhà tuyển dụng không trả tiền cho nhân viên, thì điều này sẽ gây hại cho chính doanh nghiệp, nền kinh tế và đất nước trong dài hạn.

Tiếp tục chủ đề xã hội chủ nghĩa, tôi sẽ nói rằng đảng Dân chủ tin rằng cần phải tăng chi tiêu cho tất cả các loại chương trình xã hội, như tem thực phẩm, nhà ở ngân sách, v.v. Ngược lại, đảng Cộng hòa nói rằng tất cả những điều này phải được giảm bớt, bởi vì có rất nhiều gian lận trong khu vực này Nhiều người làm việc "một cách thường xuyên" và nhận được phiếu giảm giá dưới vỏ bọc của người nghèo; Nhiều người không tìm kiếm việc làm, nhận thất nghiệp (trợ cấp thất nghiệp) và sống bằng chi phí của người nộp thuế, v.v. Và đảng Cộng hòa ủng hộ thực tế là nếu bạn đã cắt giảm chi tiêu cho các chương trình xã hội khác nhau, bạn cần đưa ra một số quy tắc, luật lệ sẽ quy định việc nhận trợ cấp xã hội của mọi người để có thể kiểm tra những người đó sử dụng ma túy và những người này thực sự đang tìm việc.

Answer:

La era del imperialismo constituyó el marco de la decisiva incorporación de América Latina a la economía mundial capitalista. Así, consolidaron un modelo de crecimiento económico basado en la especialización productiva, en la explotación extensiva y en la dependencia de los mercados exteriores. ...

Answer:

Answer:

Explanation:

First, globalization has weakened nation states: Countries and individuals alike are exposed to unprecedented risks in the face of international capital. With the fall of the Berlin Wall and collapse of the Soviet Union, the Western capitalist world order saw a golden opportunity to sweep across the planet. Expansion of such an order was given the name of “globalization” in the mid and late 1990s. The generally shallow interpretation of globalization refers to the increasingly strengthened global connections and interdependence in economy, trade, transport and communications. But the insight of such scholars as Herbert Hart is especially worth notice, as he pointed out the essence of globalization is the global expansion of capitalist production and economic relations. In this sense, globalization obviously has a longer history, only that it had not become true to its name until after the Cold War. Globalization benefited many countries and individuals, but has at the same time brought about great risks: First is the extreme imbalance in distribution of the benefits, resulting in greater gaps between nations and individuals; second, capital’s easy penetration of national boundaries has also weakened countries’ capabilities for managing and coping with such a phenomenon, exposing individuals more directly to the control of international capital, rendering them helpless.

Second, Russia-West relations are difficult to ease. Their relations are in part extension of the confrontation between the US and Soviet camps, only that Russia is evidently in a more defensive position now. After the Cold War, the West has seen unprecedented success in expanding its own sphere of influence and security boundaries, the rapid expansion of the European Union and NATO in the former Soviet Union’s sphere of influence, in particular, has inevitably made Russia nervous. The West’s success has taken advantage of its triumph in the Cold War, and come with its long-standing arrogance. In complete disregard of Russian feelings, it has extended its sphere of influence to Ukraine, a core source of Russian pride. The reactions of Vladimir Putin on one hand reflect his individual personality, but are on the other hand natural Russian defensive responses to the overbearing West. Geo-strategic factors aside, cultural factors can’t be ignored in Russia-West ties. In Russia, there has been the long-standing debate and tension over whether the country belongs to the East or West. Europeans have shown universal refusal of Russia, believing that Russia isn’t a part of Europe. The latest meeting between heads of the Catholic and Orthodox churches in Cuba again brought to attention the convoluted relations between Russian and European civilizations. Their divergent values, rooted in differences in culture, civilization and system, have demonstrated profound impacts on bilateral ties, resulting in structural and psychological standoff that is difficult to reconcile. Russia’s refusal to back down on the Ukraine issue and subsequent Western sanctions against Russia have made it possible for Putin, who is good at manipulating nationalist feelings, to maintain relatively high approval ratings at home; in the face of Western sanctions and dramatic falls in international energy prices, it is within anticipation that Putin has chosen to seek a breakthrough by intervening in Syria.

Answer:

1000 (pm) ^2

Explanation:

You cannot multiply time

If we take pm as variable,

10 x 10 x pm x 10 x pm

=> 1000 (pm) ^2