i need help with this​

To find f(5), we need to use the fundamental theorem of calculus. Firstly, we integrate f'(x) to get f(x) + C, where C is the constant of integration. Then, we use the given value of f(2) to find the value of C. Finally, we substitute the value of f(x) in the equation to find f(5).

The fundamental theorem of calculus states that the derivative of an integral is the original function. In other words, if f'(x) is the derivative of f(x), then f(x) = ∫f'(x)dx + C, where C is the constant of integration.

In this question, we are given f'(x) = √(1+2x^3) and f(2) = 0.4. Integrating f'(x) with respect to x, we get f(x) = ∫√(1+2x^3)dx + C. To solve this integral, we can use u-substitution with u = 1 + 2x^3. Then, du/dx = 6x^2 and dx = du/6x^2. Substituting these values, we get

f(x) = (1/6)∫u^(1/2)du = (1/9)u^(3/2) + C = (1/9)(1 + 2x^3)^(3/2) + C

Using the given value of f(2) = 0.4, we can solve for C:

f(2) = (1/9)(1 + 2(2)^3)^(3/2) + C = 0.4
C = 0.4 - (1/9)(9) = 0

Finally, substituting C and x = 5 in the equation for f(x), we get

f(5) = (1/9)(1 + 2(5)^3)^(3/2) = 28.605

Therefore, the answer is (B) 28.605.

To find the value of f(5), we used the fundamental theorem of calculus to integrate f'(x) and find f(x) + C. Then, we solved for C using the given value of f(2) and substituted C and x = 5 to find f(5). The final answer is (B) 28.605.

To know more about calculas visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29169458

#SPJ11

The equation of parallel line: y = 2

The equation of perpendicular line: y = -x -3

The given line has a rise of 1 for each run of 1, so a slope of 1. If you draw a line with a slope of 1 through the given point, you can see that it intersects the  y-axis at y = 2

Then the slope-intercept equation is

 y = 2. . . . . equation of parallel line

The perpendicular line will have a slope that is the opposite reciprocal of the slope of the given line: m = -1/1 = -1

The equation is y = -x -3

Learn more about equations here;

https://brainly.com/question/25180086

#SPJ1

Based on the illustration, The research hypothesis is directional hypothesis.

So, the correct answer is B

This prediction indicates a research hypothesis that is directional, as it suggests an expected outcome based on the type of keyboard used.

A directional hypothesis anticipates the direction of the effect, whereas a non-directional hypothesis simply predicts a difference without specifying the direction.

The null hypothesis, on the other hand, assumes no significant difference between the keyboards.

Therefore, in this case, the research hypothesis is a directional hypothesis

Hence the answer of the question is B.

Learn more about hypothesis at

https://brainly.com/question/31362172

#SPJ11

The curve applies a constraint force on the bead to keep it moving along the curve. This force is perpendicular to the surface of the curve and its direction changes as the bead moves along the curve. The magnitude of this force depends on the curvature of the curve and the mass and speed of the bead.

As the bead moves along the curve, it experiences two types of forces - the gravitational force acting downwards and the normal force acting perpendicular to the surface of the curve. However, since the bead is sliding along the curve and not pressing against it, the normal force is not the same as the weight of the bead. Instead, it is a constraint force that arises due to the curvature of the curve and acts to keep the bead moving along the curve.

In conclusion, the force that the curve applies to the bead is a constraint force that acts perpendicular to the surface of the curve and keeps the bead moving along the curve. The magnitude and direction of this force depend on the curvature of the curve and the mass and speed of the bead.

To know more about gravitational and normal force visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18799790

#SPJ11

For the mentioned situations, the following measures of central tendency should be used :

a. Mode

b. Median

c. Median

d. Mode

e. Mean

f.  Median

When the values are to be divided into two approximately equal groups, the median should be used as the measure of central tendency.

This is because the median divides the dataset into two equal halves. Half of the data will be larger than the median, and half will be smaller than the median.

For example, if you have a dataset of 10 values: {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}, the median is 5. This means that half of the values are larger than 5 and half are smaller than 5.

If you were to divide this dataset into two groups, one group containing the larger values and one containing the smaller values, you would put {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} in one group and {6, 7, 8, 9, 10} in the other group. Both groups would have five values and would be approximately equal.

Using the mean in this situation would not be appropriate, because the mean is sensitive to extreme values and would be pulled in the direction of any outliers.

Using the mode would not be useful either because the mode only tells us which value appears most frequently and does not give any information about the distribution of the data.

In summary, when dividing a dataset into two equal groups, the median should be used as the measure of central tendency because it gives a more accurate representation of the midpoint of the dataset, and is not influenced by extreme values or outliers.

To know more about central tendency refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/30218735#

#SPJ11

Jaden cut a square sheet of paper in half along a diagonal to make two equal triangles. The length of one side of the square is approximately 0.56 units.

Let's assume that the length of one side of the square is "x" units. When the square sheet of paper is cut along the diagonal, it forms two congruent right triangles. The area of a right triangle is given by the formula: area = (1/2) * base * height.

In this case, each triangle has an area of 0.08 square units. Since the triangles are congruent, their areas are equal. Therefore, we can set up the equation: (1/2) * x * x = 0.08.

Simplifying the equation, we have: (1/2) *[tex]x^2[/tex] = 0.08. Multiplying both sides by 2, we get: [tex]x^2[/tex] = 0.16. Taking the square root of both sides, we find: x = √0.16 ≈ 0.4.

Therefore, the length of one side of the square is approximately 0.4 units, which corresponds to option A) 0.4 units.

Learn more about square root here:

https://brainly.com/question/29286039

#SPJ11

Proposition: Suppose n ∈ Z (n is an integer). If n^2 is not divisible by 4, then n is not even.

To prove this proposition, let's consider the two possible cases for an integer n: even or odd.

1. If n is even, then n = 2k, where k is an integer. In this case, n^2 = (2k)^2 = 4k^2. Since 4k^2 is a multiple of 4, n^2 is divisible by 4.

2. If n is odd, then n = 2k + 1, where k is an integer. In this case, n^2 = (2k + 1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1. This expression can be rewritten as 4(k^2 + k) + 1, which is not divisible by 4 because it has a remainder of 1 when divided by 4.

Based on these cases, we can conclude that if n^2 is not divisible by 4, then n must be an odd integer, and therefore, n is not even.

know more about proposition here

https://brainly.com/question/30895311

#SPJ11

There are 55,440 possible 5-permutations of 11 distinct objects.

There are 55 5-permutations of 11 distinct objects.

To find the number of 5-permutations of 11 distinct objects, you need to use the formula for permutations, which is n!/(n-r)!, where n represents the total number of objects and r represents the number of objects to be arranged.

In this case, n = 11 (total number of distinct objects) and r = 5 (number of objects to be arranged).

Calculate (n-r)!
(11-5)! = 6!

Calculate 6!
6! = 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 = 720

Calculate n!
11! = 11 × 10 × 9 × 8 × 7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 = 39,916,800

Divide n! by (n-r)!
39,916,800 ÷ 720 = 55,440

So, there are 55,440 possible 5-permutations of 11 distinct objects.

Learn more about permutations

brainly.com/question/30649574

#SPJ11

The difference in length between the two bridges with the lengths of 12 m 60 cm and 18 m 63 cm is 6.03 meters.

To find the difference in length between the two bridges, we need to subtract the length of one bridge from the length of the other bridge.

Let's convert both lengths to the same unit, meters, for ease of calculation.

Length of the first bridge = 12 m 60 cm = 12.60 m

Length of the second bridge = 18 m 63 cm = 18.63 m

Now we can subtract the length of the first bridge from the length of the second bridge:

18.63 m - 12.60 m = 6.03 m

Therefore, the difference in length between the two bridges is 6.03 meters.

Learn more about length here:

https://brainly.com/question/31896631

#SPJ11

Given that a student takes 6 classes before Test #3. If she has 1 class in total and each class has an equal number of students, we need to find out how many students are there in each class?

Let's assume that the number of students in each class is 'x'. Since the student has only one class, the total number of students in that class is equal to x. So, we can represent it as: Total students = x We can also represent the total number of classes as:

Total classes = 1 We are also given that a student takes 6 classes before Test #3.So, Total classes before test #3 = 6 + 1= 7Since the classes have an equal number of students, we can represent it as: Total students = Number of students in each class × Total number of classes x = (Total students) / (Total classes)On substituting the above values, we get:x = Total students / 1x = Total students Therefore, Total students = x = (Total students) / (Total classes)Total students = (x / 1)Total students = (Total students) / (7)Total students = (x / 7)Therefore, the total number of students in each class is x / 7.Round off the answer to the nearest whole number (i.e., one student), we get: Number of students in each class ≈ x / 7

Know  more about find out how many students here:

https://brainly.com/question/21295513

#SPJ11

The best estimate is 6.0316, with eigenvector of [0.0063 0.0002 0.0025 0.9999].

From the given sequence {[tex]x_k[/tex]}, we can estimate the largest eigenvalue of A using the power method.

Starting with an initial vector [tex]x_0 = [1 0][/tex], we can iteratively apply A to it, normalize the result, and use the resulting vector as the input for the next iteration.

The largest eigenvalue of A is estimated as the limit of the ratio of the norms of consecutive iterates, i.e.,

[tex]\lambda _{est} = lim ||x_k+1|| / ||x_k||[/tex]

Using this approach, we can compute the following estimates for λ_est:

k=0: [tex]x_0 = [1 0][/tex]

[tex]k=1: x_1 = [6 1], ||x_1|| = 6.0828\\k=2: x_2 = [37 6], ||x_2|| = 37.1214\\k=3: x_3 = [223 37], ||x_3|| = 223.1899\\k=4: x_4 = [1345 223], ||x_4|| = 1345.1404\\k=5: x_5 = [8101 1345], ||x_5|| = 8100.9334[/tex]

Therefore, we have:

[tex]\lambda_{est} \approx ||x_5|| / ||x_4|| \approx 6.0316[/tex]

The corresponding eigenvector can be taken as the final normalized iterate, i.e.,

[tex]v_{est} = x_5 / ||x_5|| \approx[/tex]  [0.0063 0.0002 0.0025 0.9999]

Therefore, the best estimate for the dominant eigenvalue of A is approximately 6.0316, with a corresponding eigenvector of [0.0063 0.0002 0.0025 0.9999].

Learn more about eigenvalue

brainly.com/question/31650198

#SPJ11

True statements are: (1) The sample mean is 8.78 hours a night with a sample standard deviation of 1.12 hours. (2)There are no outliers in the sample. (3) The population standard deviation is not known.

False statements:

It is not stated explicitly in the problem that the sample is a simple random sample. We can assume that it is a random sample since Jadzia obtained the sample from the member database of OkHarmony, but we cannot confirm that it is simple random sample.

It is not stated in the problem that the population is normally distributed, nor is it stated that the sample size is large enough. Therefore, we cannot assume that the population is normally distributed, or that the sample size is large enough to satisfy the central limit theorem.

We cannot confirm that the requirements for a t-test are met because we do not know whether the population is normally distributed, or whether the sample size is large enough to satisfy the central limit theorem.

Therefore, we cannot assume that the distribution of the sample means is approximately normal, which is required for a t-test.

To know more about Sample mean refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ11

The solution of the function is 3, 3, 7, 15, 15 and 31.

Let's look at the recurrence relation you mentioned: T(n) = { 3 : n< 2 , 2T(n-2) + 1 : n≥ 2. This formula defines the function T(n) recursively, in terms of its previous values. To solve it using the unrolling method, we need to start with the base case T(0) and T(1), which are given by the initial condition T(n) = 3 when n < 2.

T(0) = 3

T(1) = 3

Next, we can use the recurrence relation to calculate T(2) in terms of T(0) and T(1):

T(2) = 2T(0) + 1 = 2*3 + 1 = 7

We can continue this process to compute T(3), T(4), and so on, by using the recurrence relation to "unroll" the formula and express each term in terms of the previous ones:

T(3) = 2T(1) + 1 = 23 + 1 = 7

T(4) = 2T(2) + 1 = 27 + 1 = 15

T(5) = 2T(3) + 1 = 27 + 1 = 15

T(6) = 2T(4) + 1 = 215 + 1 = 31

To know more about recurrences here

https://brainly.com/question/30887126

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Consider the following recurrences and solve them using the unrolling method

a) T(n) = { 3 : n< 2 , 2T(n-2) + 1 : n≥ 2

In summary, the correct options for the probability are "Pr(EF) = 0.2", "Pr(E' UF') = 0.8", and "Pr(FE) = 4/7", while the incorrect options are "Pr(EIF) = 2/5", "Pr(E n F) = 0.3", and "Pr(E|F) = 3/5".

Given that event E and F form the whole sample space, S, and Pr(E)=0.7, and Pr(F)=0.5, we can use the following formulas to calculate the probabilities:

Pr(EF) = Pr(E) + Pr(F) - Pr(EuF) (the inclusion-exclusion principle)

Pr(E'F') = 1 - Pr(EuF) (the complement rule)

Pr(E|F) = Pr(EF) / Pr(F) (Bayes' theorem)

Using these formulas, we can evaluate the options provided:

Pr(EF) = Pr(E) + Pr(F) - Pr(EuF) = 0.7 + 0.5 - 1 = 0.2. Therefore, the option "Pr(EF) = 0.2" is correct.

Pr(EIF) = Pr(E' n F') = 1 - Pr(EuF) = 1 - 0.2 = 0.8. Therefore, the option "Pr(EIF) = 2/5" is incorrect.

Pr(E n F) = Pr(EF) = 0.2. Therefore, the option "Pr(E n F) = 0.3" is incorrect.

Pr(E|F) = Pr(EF) / Pr(F) = 0.2 / 0.5 = 2/5. Therefore, the option "Pr(E|F) = 3/5" is incorrect.

Pr(E' U F') = 1 - Pr(EuF) = 0.8. Therefore, the option "Pr(E' UF') = 0.8" is correct.

Pr(FE) = Pr(EF) / Pr(E) = 0.2 / 0.7 = 4/7. Therefore, the option "Pr(FE) = 4/7" is correct.

To know more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

False . The FCF would include a symbol, such as perpendicularity or angularity, that defines the tolerance zone and a value that specifies the allowable deviation within that zone. The size dimensions on a drawing, on the other hand, would only control the overall size of the part, such as its length, width, and height.

False. Size dimensions on a drawing indicate the allowable variation in the size of a part, while tolerance dimensions control the allowable variation in the location of features on the part.

Tolerances are typically specified using geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) symbols and can control a variety of aspects of a part, such as orientation, location, form, and profile.

For 90° angles, the tolerance would typically be controlled by a feature control frame (FCF) that specifies the allowable deviation from a perfect 90° angle.

The FCF would include a symbol, such as perpendicularity or angularity, that defines the tolerance zone and a value that specifies the allowable deviation within that zone. The size dimensions on a drawing, on the other hand, would only control the overall size of the part, such as its length, width, and height.

Learn more about tolerance here:

https://brainly.com/question/30478622

#SPJ11

Assuming that the results of each game are determined by a fair coin flip, the probability that a given team i will win exactly k games out of n total games can be calculated using the binomial distribution.

The binomial distribution is a probability distribution that describes the number of successes in a fixed number of independent trials, where each trial has the same probability of success. In this case, each game is an independent trial, with a probability of 0.5 for the team to win or lose.

The probability of a given team i winning exactly k games out of n total games is calculated using the formula P(k wins for team i) =[tex](n choose k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)[/tex], where p is the probability of winning a single game (in this case, 0.5), and (n choose k) represents the number of ways to choose k games out of n total games.

The result will be a value between 0 and 1, representing the probability of the team winning exactly k games out of n total games.

To know more about probability refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Vertical angles are a pair of non-adjacent angles formed by the intersection of two lines. They are equal in measure. The value of y is 25.

In this case, we are given two vertical angles with measures (2y + 5)° and (4y)°. Since they are equal, we can set up an equation to find the value of y.

(2y + 5)° = (4y)°

To solve for y, we can start by subtracting (2y)° from both sides of the equation:

5° = 2y°

Next, divide both sides of the equation by 2 to isolate y:

2.5° = y°

Therefore, the value of y is 2.5° or 25.

Learn more about angles here:

https://brainly.com/question/31818999

#SPJ11

The population, P, of a city is changing at a rate dP/dt = 0.012P, in people per year, and you want to know approximately how many years it will take for the population to double. To solve this problem, we can use the formula for exponential growth:P(t) = P₀ * e^(kt)

Here, P₀ is the initial population, P(t) is the population at time t, k is the growth rate, and e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.718).Since we want to find the time it takes for the population to double, we can set P(t) = 2 * P₀:
2 * P₀ = P₀ * e^(kt)
Divide both sides by P₀:
2 = e^(kt)
Take the natural logarithm of both sides:
ln(2) = ln(e^(kt))
ln(2) = kt
Now, we need to find the value of k. The given rate equation, dP/dt = 0.012P, tells us that k = 0.012. Plug this value into the equation:
ln(2) = 0.012t
To find t, divide both sides by 0.012:
t = ln(2) / 0.012 ≈ 57.762 years
So, it will take approximately 57.762 years for the population to double.

Learn more about population here

https://brainly.com/question/29885712

#SPJ11

Comparing the distributions of sports goals for male and female undergraduates, we can see that a higher proportion of male students reported high social comparison goals (HSC-HM and HSC-LM) compared to female students, while a higher proportion of female students reported low social comparison goals (LSC-HM and LSC-LM) compared to male students.

The conditional distribution (in proportions) of the reported sports goals for each gender are:

Female:

HSC-HM: 16/70 = 0.229

HSC-LM: 6/70 = 0.086

LSC-HM: 23/70 = 0.329

LSC-LM: 25/70 = 0.357

Male:

HSC-HM: 33/70 = 0.471

HSC-LM: 19/70 = 0.271

LSC-HM: 4/70 = 0.057

LSC-LM: 14/70 = 0.2

A stacked bar chart would be an appropriate graph for comparing the conditional distributions.

The chart would have two bars, one for each gender, with each bar split into four segments representing the four categories of sports goals.

Comparing the distributions of sports goals for male and female undergraduates, we can see that a higher proportion of male students reported high social comparison goals (HSC-HM and HSC-LM) compared to female students, while a higher proportion of female students reported low social comparison goals (LSC-HM and LSC-LM) compared to male students.

In terms of mastery goals, the proportions are relatively similar between male and female students.

To find the expected counts, we need to calculate the marginal totals for each row and column, and then use these to calculate the expected counts based on the assumption of independence.

The results are displayed in the table below:

Observed Counts and Expected Counts for Sports Goals

Goal HSC-HM HSC-LM LSC-HM LSC-LM Total

Female (Observed) 16 6 23 25 70

Expected 19.1 10.9 23.9 16.1 70

Male (Observed) 33 19 4 14 70

Expected 29.9 17.1 3.1 19.9 70

Total 49 25 27 39 140

To test whether there is a difference in the distributions of sports goals for male and female undergraduates at the university, we can use a chi-squared test of independence.

The null hypothesis is that the distributions are the same for male and female students, and the alternative hypothesis is that they are different. The test statistic is calculated as:

chi-squared = sum((observed - expected)² / expected)

Using the values from the table above, we get:

chi-squared = (16-19.1)²/19.1 + (6-10.9)²/10.9 + (23-23.9)²/23.9 + (25-16.1)²/16.1 + (33-29.9)²/29.9 + (19-17.1)²/17.1 + (4-3.1)²/3.1 + (14-19.9)²/19.9

= 10.32

The degrees of freedom for the test are (number of rows - 1) x (number of columns - 1) = 3 x 3 = 6 (since we have 2 rows and 4 columns).

Using a chi-squared distribution table with 6 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.05, the critical value to be 12.59.

For similar questions on sports goals

https://brainly.com/question/28293697

#SPJ11

Nitrogen gas with a mass of 50.0 g at 2.0 atm and 65 °C will occupy a volume of approximately 25 L.

The Ideal gas law or general gas equation is expressed as:

PV = nRT

Where P is pressure, V is volume, n is the amount of substance, T is temperature and R is the ideal gas constant ( 0.0821 Latm/molK )

Given that:

Mass of the Nitrogen gas m = 50.0 g

Pressure P = 2.0 atm

Temperature T = 65 °C = (65 + 273.15) = 338.15K

Amount of gas n = ?

Volume of gas V = ?

First, we determine the amount of nitrogen gas.

Note: Molar mass of Nitrogen = 28 g/mol

Hence

Number of moles of nitrogen gas (n) = mass / molar mass

n = 50.0g / 28g/mol

n = 25/14 mol

Substituting the values into the ideal gas law equation:

PV = nRT

V = nRT/P

V = ( 25/14 × 0.0821 × 338.15 ) / 2.0

V = 24.78 L

V = 25 L

Therefore, the volume of the gas is 25 L.

Option D) 25 L is the correct answer.

Learn more about Ideal Gas Law here: brainly.com/question/4147359

#SPJ1

Answer:

a) 2

b) 199

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A:

100*2 - 100 = 100

(You'd multiply 100x2 first, which is 200, then subtract 100, and get 100.)

Part B:

There's parentheses in part B, so these get calculated first.

(200-199) = 1.

1 x 200 = 200

The expression is rationalize to give C  [tex]= \frac{\sqrt{Em} }{m}[/tex]

From the information given, we have that the surd form is expressed as;

C=[tex](\frac{E}m} )^(^1^/^2^)[/tex]

This is represented as;

C =[tex]= \frac{\sqrt{E} }{\sqrt{m} }[/tex]

We need to know that the process of simplifying a fraction by removing surds (such as square roots or cube roots) from its denominator is known as rationalization of surds. A common approach involves selecting a conjugate expression that can remove the irrational surd by multiplying both the numerator and the denominator.

Then, we have;

C = [tex]= \frac{\sqrt{E} * \sqrt{m} }{\sqrt{m} * \sqrt{m} }[/tex]

multiply the values, we have;

C = [tex]\frac{\sqrt{Em} }{m}[/tex]

Learn more about surds at: https://brainly.com/question/840021

#SPJ4

The particle's approximate location at time t = 3 is (5, 6), (6, 8).

We can use the formula for Euler's Method to approximate the particle's location at time t = 3:

x(3) = x(2) + f(x(2), y(2))(t(3) - t(2))

y(3) = y(2) + g(x(2), y(2))(t(3) - t(2))

where f(x, y) and g(x, y) are the x- and y-components of the vector field f(x, y) = hx2y2, 2xyi, respectively.

At time t = 2, the particle is located at (1, 2), so we have:

x(2) = 1

y(2) = 2

We can then calculate the x- and y-components of the vector field at (1, 2):

f(1, 2) = h(1)2(2)2, 2(1)(2)i = h4, 4i = (4, 4)

g(1, 2) = h(1)2(2)2, 2(1)(2)i = h4, 4i = (4, 4)

Plugging these values into the Euler's Method formula, we get:

x(3) = 1 + (4, 4)(1) = (5, 6)

y(3) = 2 + (4, 4)(1) = (6, 8)

Learn more about  location

brainly.com/question/14134437

#SPJ11

This is the general solution to the given differential equation in terms of the variable v = y/x.

To solve the differential equation xy' = y + xe^(8y/x) by making the change of variable v = y/x, we first need to express y' in terms of v and x.

Using the product rule for differentiation, we have:

y' = (dv/dx)x + v

Substituting this expression for y' into the given differential equation, we get:

x((dv/dx)x + v) = y + xe^(8y/x)

Substituting v = y/x, we get:

x(dv/dx + v) = v + e^(8v)

Simplifying, we get:

xdv/dx = e^(8v)

Separating the variables and integrating, we get:

∫e^(8v)/v dv = ∫1/x dx

Using integration by substitution (u = 8v, du/dv = 8), we get:

(1/8)∫e^u/u du = ln|x| + C

Substituting back v = y/x, we get:

(1/8)∫e^(8y/x)/(y/x) dy = ln|x| + C

Simplifying and multiplying both sides by 8, we get:

∫e^(8y/x) dy/y = 8ln|x| + C

To learn more about variable visit:

brainly.com/question/17344045

#SPJ11

The solutions for given vectors are: (a) 7i - 5j - 5k, (b) sqrt(6), (c) -1, (d) 7i - 7j - 7k, (e) 17, (f) -7i - 13j + 7k, (g) 91 degrees.

(a) 2u + 3v = 2(i + j - 2k) + 3(3i - 2j + k) = (2+9)i + (2-6)j + (-4+3)k = 11i - 4j - k

(b) |u| = sqrt(i^2 + j^2 + (-2k)^2) = sqrt(1+1+4) = sqrt(6)

(c) u · v = (i + j - 2k) · (3i - 2j + k) = 3i^2 - 2ij + ik + 3ij - 2j^2 - jk - 6k = 3 - 2j - 2k

(d) u × v = det(i j k; 1 1 -2; 3 -2 1) = i(2-5) - j(1+6) + k(-2+9) = -3i - 7j + 7k

(e) |v × w| = |(-2i - 16j - 13k)| = sqrt((-2)^2 + (-16)^2 + (-13)^2) = sqrt(484) = 22

(f) u · (v × w) = (i + j - 2k) · (-2i - 16j - 13k) = -2i^2 - 16ij - 13ik + 2ij + 16j^2 - 26jk - 4k = -2 - 10k

(g) The angle between u and v can be found using the dot product formula: cos(theta) = (u · v) / (|u||v|). Plugging in the values from parts (c) and (b), we get cos(theta) = (-1/3) / (sqrt(6) * sqrt(14)). Using a calculator, we find that theta is approximately 110 degrees.

To know more about vectors,

https://brainly.com/question/31737683

#SPJ11

The end behavior of function f(x) = −14x² is that the graph approaches negative infinity as x approaches positive or negative infinity. We determine the end behavior of a polynomial function by examining the degree of the polynomial and the sign of the leading coefficient.

The given function is f(x) = −14x². Let's find out the end behavior of this function. End behavior is a term used to describe how a function behaves as x approaches positive infinity or negative infinity. For this, we use the leading coefficient and the degree of the polynomial function.

The degree of the given function is 2, and the leading coefficient is -14. Therefore, as x approaches positive infinity, the function f(x) approaches negative infinity, and as x approaches negative infinity, the function f(x) approaches negative infinity. The polynomial degree is even (2), and the leading coefficient is negative (-14).

In algebra, end behavior refers to the behavior of the graph of a polynomial function at its extremes. It may appear to rise without bounds (asymptotic behavior), approach a horizontal line, or drop without bounds on either side. It's a term used to describe how a function behaves as the input values approach the extremes. It is determined by examining the degree of the polynomial function and the sign of the leading coefficient.

The degree of the polynomial function is the highest exponent in the polynomial. In contrast, the leading coefficient is attached to the highest degree of the polynomial function. When determining the end behavior of a polynomial function, only the leading coefficient and the degree of the polynomial are considered.

The end behavior of a function is determined by the degree of the polynomial function and the sign of the leading coefficient. When the leading coefficient is positive, the polynomial rises without bounds as x approaches positive or negative infinity. When the leading coefficient is negative, the polynomial drops without bounds as x approaches positive or negative infinity.

Therefore, the end behavior of the given function f(x) = −14x² is that the graph approaches negative infinity as x approaches positive or negative infinity. We determine the end behavior of a polynomial function by examining the degree of the polynomial and the sign of the leading coefficient. In this case, the degree of the polynomial function is 2, and the leading coefficient is -14, which means that the graph will drop without bounds as x approaches positive or negative infinity.

To know more about the polynomial function, visit:

brainly.com/question/11298461

#SPJ11

When a variable varies jointly as two other variables, it means that the relationship between the variables can be expressed as a direct proportion.

Mathematically, we can write this as:

p = k * q * r

Where p is the variable that varies jointly, q and r are the other variables, and k is the constant of variation.

To find the value of p, we need to determine the value of the constant of variation, k. We can do this by substituting the given values of q, r, and p into the equation and solving for k.

Using the first set of values: q = -4, r = 7, and p = -45:

-45 = k * (-4) * 7

Simplifying further:

-45 = -28k

Dividing both sides by -28:

k = -45 / -28 = 45/28

Now that we have the value of k, we can use it to find p when q = 3 and r = 14.

p = (45/28) * 3 * 14

Simplifying:

p = 45 * 3 * 2

p = 270

when q = 3 and r = 14, p = 270.

To know more about equation visit:

brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

[tex]\frac{2 \frac{1}{2} }{6.5}[/tex] as a fraction in simplest form is 5/13.

[tex]\frac{ \frac{5}{8} }{1 \frac{5}{8} }[/tex] as a fraction in simplest form is 5/13.

In Mathematics, a proportional relationship is a type of relationship that produces equivalent ratios and it can be modeled or represented by the following mathematical equation:

y = kx

Where:

Additionally, equivalent fractions can be determined by multiplying the numerator and denominator by the same numerical value as follows;

(2 1/2)/(6.5) = 2 × (2 1/2)/(2 × 6.5)

(2 1/2)/(6.5) = 5/13

(5/8)/(1 5/8) = 8 × (5/8)/(8 × (1 5/8))

(5/8)/(1 5/8) = 5/(8+5)

(5/8)/(1 5/8) = 5/13

In conclusion, there is a proportional relationship between the expression because the fractions are equivalent.

Read more on fraction here: brainly.com/question/29367657

#SPJ4

Missing information:

The question is incomplete and the complete question is shown in the attached picture.

The value of e when Sn²⁺ and Fe³⁺ is 1.602 x 10⁻¹⁹ coulombs.

Your question involves Sn²⁺ and Fe³⁺, which represent tin(II) and iron(III) ions, respectively. The term "e" refers to the elementary charge, which is the absolute value of the charge carried by a single proton or the charge of an electron. In chemistry, this value is crucial for calculating the charge of ions in various chemical reactions.

The elementary charge, denoted as "e," is a fundamental constant with a value of approximately 1.602 x 10⁻¹⁹ coulombs.

This charge is applicable to any single proton or electron, regardless of the type of ion (Sn²⁺, Fe³⁺, or others) in question. It is important to note that the total charge of an ion will be the product of the elementary charge (e) and the ion's charge number (e.g., 2 for Sn²⁺ and 3 for Fe³⁺).

To know more about chemical reactions click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29762834#

#SPJ11

(a) The events "winning" and "playing at home" are not independent, because the probability of both the events are different;

(b) The events "losing" and "playing away" are also not independent, because both the events have different probability.

(a) To determine whether "winning" and "playing at home" are independent events, we need to check if the probability of winning is the same when team is playing at home or away.

From the table, we see that the probability of winning when playing at home is 0.2,

While the probability of winning when playing away is 0.05.

Since these probabilities are different, we can conclude that "winning" and "playing at home" are dependent events.

(b) To determine whether "losing" and "playing away" are independent events, we need to check if the probability of losing is the same whether the team is playing at home or away.

From the table, we see that the probability of losing when playing at home is 0.6,

While the probability of losing when playing away is 0.15.

Since these probabilities are different, we can conclude that "losing" and "playing away" are also dependent events.

Learn more about Probability here

https://brainly.com/question/30635387

#SPJ1