If you are turning left from a two-way street onto a one-way street, you should complete the turn into the left lane .
Once you have turned onto the one-way street, you may turn into any lane that is safely open and appropriate for your destination. It is important to check for other vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists before making the turn and to signal your intention to turn in advance.
If there is a center left turn lane, use it. turning left onto a two-way street from a one-way street. Starting in the far-left lane, make the turn. End the turn in the left lane closest to the middle of the street moving in the direction of your vehicle to lower the likelihood of a collision.
Learn more about two-way street
https://brainly.com/question/29424500
#SPJ4
For liability to be imposed when negligence is alleged, in many jurisdictions, the injured party must prove that the defendant's act was not only the cause in fact of the injury but also the ____of the injury.a. superseding cause
b. intervening conduct or strict liability
c. misappropriation
d. proximate cause or substantial factor e. none of the other choices are required
For liability to be imposed when negligence is alleged, in many jurisdictions, the injured party must prove that the defendant's act was not only the cause in fact of the injury but also the proximate cause or substantial factor of the injury. Therefore, the correct answer is option D. Proximate cause or substantial factor.
What is negligence? Negligence is the failure of an individual or entity to use reasonable care, resulting in the injury of another person or entity. Negligence may be claimed in a personal injury lawsuit or other types of litigation such as wrongful death, medical malpractice, or product liability cases. Causation is the foundation of a negligence claim. The plaintiff must show that the defendant's actions or failure to act caused the plaintiff's injuries.
The plaintiff must establish both factual and legal causation. Negligence per se is a term used to describe when a defendant breaches a duty of care. Negligence per se occurs when a defendant violates a statute or other legal duty, and the plaintiff is a member of the class of people the statute or legal duty is designed to protect. The proximate cause is an essential component of a negligence claim, which is another term for legal causation.
Legal causation examines the foreseeability of an event and determines whether the defendant's actions were the cause of the plaintiff's injuries. To be legally causal, the defendant's conduct must be the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
To know more about negligence is alleged refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14833032#
#SPJ11
Suppose the federal government reduces the amount of money it spends on solar energy subsidies. as a result, AD shifts to the____leftright
Suppose the federal government reduces the amount of money it spends on solar energy subsidies. As a result, AD (aggregate demand) shifts to the left.
The reason for this is that solar energy subsidies would have been stimulating demand in the economy by providing incentives for consumers and businesses to invest in solar energy, which would have increased spending and economic activity.
By reducing these subsidies, the government is effectively removing some of this demand stimulus, which can lead to a decrease in spending and economic activity. This decrease in spending would lead to a shift in the aggregate demand curve to the left, as fewer goods and services are demanded at every price level.
To know more about the demand curve , here
https://brainly.com/question/25910814
#SPJ4
Zippers, Corp., a development company, has constructed a zip-line course on government land after signing a leasing agreement with the state government. A few years after signing the agreement, the state authority sanctioned the Never-ending Tunnel Company to build a long tunnel through the land where the zip-line course already exists. The proprietors of Zippers, Corp. claim that the state authority has violated their existing agreement. Which of the following is most likely to be applied in this case between Zippers, Corp. and the state government?
A) the doctrine of preemption
B) the free exercise clause
C) the contract clause
D) the establishment clause
E) the commerce clause (has to do with fed gov... we k it can't be the answer to this q bc this q doesn't have to do with fed gov)
The most likely applicable clause in this case between Zippers, Corp., and the state government is the Contract Clause. Thus, option c is correct.
The Contract Clause is a clause in Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution, which forbids states from violating or terminating contracts made by individuals or corporations.
The Contract Clause states that no State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. This clause is aimed at preventing state governments from passing laws that would interfere with private contracts' performance.
The Contract Clause applies to public contracts, such as those signed by state or local governments with private contractors or public-sector workers, as well as private contracts.
This clause states that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. Thus, the option c contract clause best describes the case.
Learn more about Contract Clause here:
brainly.com/question/25697446
#SPJ11
Arguments are present in everyday life of many American citizens. Understanding how to decipher an argument helps you understand the context of the arguer and the meaning of what is being said. Therefore, it is imperative to learn how to break down an argument, especially if you have a good professor.
I can confirm that being able to analyze and dissect an argument is an important life skill. Arguments are common in a variety of settings, including the workplace, politics, and personal relationships.
What is meant by Analyze and dissect?Analyze and dissect both refer to the process of separating something into its component parts in order to gain a deeper comprehension of its structure, significance, and purpose. You carefully and critically examine something when you analyze or dissect it, looking for patterns, connections, and relationships between its components. Analyzing or dissecting an argument may involve identifying its main claims, evidence, and reasoning, as well as any biases, assumptions, or fallacies that may be present. Analyzing and dissecting objects aims to gain a more in-depth comprehension of their subject matter so that they can make more informed choices and judgments.
To know more about Critically Examine, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24143106
#SPJ1
What is the reciprocal program?
The reciprocal program is an agreement between two countries that allow citizens to travel between the two countries without the need for a visa.
Citizens no longer have to pay the fee associated with filing for a visa, which makes travel simpler and more economical for them.
Check the requirements before traveling as the reciprocal program is not open to all nations and is subject to modification.
The reciprocal program promotes residents to explore and learn about various cultures, which can facilitate cultural exchange.
As it promotes travel and trade between the two nations, it can also aid in the strengthening of economic relations.
To know more about economics,
https://brainly.com/question/17996535
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in baker v. carr (1962) ? O responses because rural districts had fewer people
The correct statement that accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962) is (A) responses because rural districts had fewer people and (B) representation was unevenly distributed.
The case involved the issue of redistricting and how it affected the distribution of voting power. The plaintiff, Charles Baker, argued that his vote was worth less than those of voters in other districts due to an uneven distribution of population. The Supreme Court held that this issue was a justiciable question and ruled that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear the case. The Court's decision established the principle of "one person, one vote," which requires that each individual's vote should have equal weight in the election process, and paved the way for further redistricting cases to be heard by the courts.
Learn more about Supreme Court :
https://brainly.com/question/10739091
#SPJ1
The complete question is :
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in baker v. carr (1962) ?
(A) responses because rural districts had fewer people
(B) representation was unevenly distributed
(C) baker was denied equal protection under the law
Although several events in U.S. history led to bureaucratic growth, one event stands out for leading to policy changes that dramatically increased growth in both bureaucratic agencies and personnel. That event was
The New Deal of the 1930's was the most significant event in U.S. history that stood out for leading to policy changes that dramatically increased growth in both bureaucratic agencies and personnel.
The New Deal was a series of programs and policies enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression. It was a series of policy changes that enabled the growth of the federal bureaucracy and provided relief to the millions of people who had been affected by the Great Depression. It consisted of a number of programs designed to get people back to work, provide relief to the unemployed, reform the banking system, and regulate industry. The increased growth in both bureaucratic agencies and personnel was during the industrial revolution.
To learn more about policy click here https://brainly.com/question/30812351
#SPJ1
which of the following most likely would not be required to complete continuing education hours in this state?
Insurance brokers most likely would not be required to complete continuing education hours in this state.
The word "insurance broker" became a regulated term under the Insurance Brokers (Registration) Act 1977, which was intended to prohibit enterprises claiming to be brokers but really working as agents for one or more preferred insurance companies.
Following the repeal of the 1977 Act, the word has no legal definition. From 14 January 2005 until 31 March 2013, the sale of general insurance was regulated by the Financial Services Authority, and from 1 April 2013, it has been regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Anyone or any business that has been authorized by the Authority can now call themselves an insurance broker.
The question is incomplete, complete question "Which of the following would most likely NOT be required to complete continuing education hours in this state?
A. insurance brokers
B. resident producers
C. insurance consultants
D. nonresident producers"
Learn more about insurance broker
brainly.com/question/14956153
#SPJ4
what type of case would involve a person suing someone else for money?
A monetary damages lawsuit is a case in which one party sues another for monetary compensation for losses, damages, or injuries caused by the other party’s negligence, breach of contract, or other wrongdoing.
Monetary damages typically include medical costs, pain and suffering, lost wages, and property damage, but may also include punitive damages, which are designed to punish wrongdoers and deter others from similar behavior. These lawsuits can be filed by individuals or by a representative on behalf of a deceased or incapacitated individual. Monetary damages lawsuits may be brought to civil court in a variety of circumstances, including car accidents, workplace accidents, product liability cases, or medical malpractice cases.
Know more about monetary here:
https://brainly.com/question/24373500
#SPJ11
The Art Forger Who Tricked the Nazis
Where did the trial take place? What was the defendant accused of?
What was strange about his defense?
How did Han van Meegeren manage to forge the works of art so well? What did he do to make them look authentic?
How could forensic testing have changed this case?
What ultimately happened to van Meegeren?
Money to Run, But No Skills to Hide
How did Schrenker try to fake his own death? How did he get caught?
Why is creating a new state ID harder to do these days?
Why is it so difficult to fake a passport? What is the easiest way for criminals to obtain a passport?
Why does Mr. Abagnale claim it is easy to get a fraudulent passport? What steps does someone have to take to make this happen?
Why was Mr. Abagnale arrested? What happened to him after his arrest?
which amendment preserves the right to a trial by jury in civil cases?
Answer:
The Seventh Amendment
Explanation:
how does the process for amending state constitutions compare to that of the u.s. constitution?
The process for amending state constitutions varies by state and is typically less rigorous than the process for amending the U.S. Constitution.
The amendment process for the U.S. Constitution requires the approval of two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. The state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution are similar in many respects, but they differ in terms of the process for amending them. The process for amending the U.S. Constitution is a more difficult process than the process for amending state constitutions. It is also more difficult to amend the U.S. Constitution than to amend state constitutions.
The U.S. Constitution's amendment process In the United States, amending the Constitution is a difficult and time-consuming process. To amend the Constitution, a proposal must receive the approval of two-thirds of the members of both the House of Representatives and the Senate or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.
The state constitutions' amendment process In comparison, the amendment process for state constitutions is less stringent. Depending on the state, the amendment process may be initiated by a petition of a certain number of voters, a majority vote of the state legislature, or by a constitutional convention.
To learn more about Constitutions :
https://brainly.com/question/30189232
#SPJ11
Inadvertently, Morris leaves his backpack at NuWay Launderers when he stops to pick up his clothes. The backpack is
a. abandoned property
b. gifted property
c. lost property
d. mislaid property
The correct answer is C. Lost Property. Lost property is any property unintentionally left behind or forgotten. It is important to note that the person who left the property must not have had the intention of abandoning it.
C. Lost property. The classification for Morris's backpack at NuWay Launderers when he stops to pick up his clothes is "lost property." "Lost property Lost is property that has been unintentionally left by its owner.
It differs from "mislaid" property, which is property that has been intentionally set down by its owner but then forgotten. Inadvertently, Morris leaves his backpack at NuWay Launderers when he stops to pick up his clothes, which means he unintentionally left his property behind. Therefore, the backpack is lost property, not abandoned, gifted, or mislaid property. Abandoned property: property that the owner has given up completely with no intention of reclaiming it.
Gifted property: Property that is intentionally transferred from one person to another without payment or consideration. Mislaid property: Property that is intentionally set down by the owner but then forgotten.
For more such questions on property
https://brainly.com/question/26121045
#SPJ11
The sentiments expressed in the excerpt are best explained in connection to which of the following broader developments during the period?A. Rising influence of evangelical Christian political organizationsB. A widening political and cultural gap between young people and earlier generationsC. Growing support for suburbanization and for having large, nuclear familiesD. Increasing calls for the United States to take a more aggressive stance against immigration
The sentiments that are best explained in connection to broader developments during the period is B. A widening political and cultural gap between young people and earlier generations
What does the term "cultural gap" mean?Any systematic difference between two cultures that impedes communication or relationships is referred to as a cultural gap. The values, behavior, education, and customs of the many cultures are examples of such variances.
The conversation on women's education highlights the cultural divide between spouses with college degrees and their sometimes illiterate wives. By doing this, they implied a difference in pro- and anti-social attitudes between themselves and the youngsters.
Learn more about developments at:
https://brainly.com/question/11352260
#SPJ1
Although several events in U.S. history led to bureaucratic growth, one event stands out for leading to policy changes that dramatically increased growth in both bureaucratic agencies and personnel. That event was
The event that dramatically increased bureaucratic growth in both agencies and personnel in the U.S. was the New Deal of 1933, which was the name given to a series of economic and social reforms created by President Franklin Roosevelt.
The New Deal included laws and reforms that sought to help those affected by the Great Depression and strengthen the economy. It created a number of new governmental programs, including the Social Security Administration, the Civilian Conservation Corps, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The New Deal also increased the size and role of the federal government, with its many new agencies, and expanded the power of the President. It provided jobs for millions of Americans and new regulations for businesses.
The New Deal also increased taxes and strengthened labor unions, allowing for workers to have greater job security.
Overall, the New Deal was responsible for significantly expanding the size and scope of the federal government and its bureaucracy.
To know more about Great Depression click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29771180#
#SPJ11
what the number of base cases required is always equal to the number of propositions you need to assume to be true in the induction hypothesis?
The number of base cases required is always EQUAL to the number of propositions that you need to assume to be true in the induction hypothesis is a statement regarding mathematical induction.
Mathematical induction is a mathematical proof method that involves establishing a statement about an infinite or finite collection of mathematical objects by verifying that it is true for a particular case known as the base case (n = 1 for example), and then verifying that if it is true for any particular case (n = k), it must be true for the next case (n = k + 1).
In simple words, mathematical induction is used to prove that a statement or property is true for every natural number, or for an infinite set of natural numbers. The process begins with proving the statement to be true for a small, finite value of n, which is called the base case. This base case is then assumed true for some value k, and then it is proven that if the statement is true for k, it must also be true for k+1.
Learn more about mathematical induction at https://brainly.com/question/29503103
#SPJ11
which of the following agencies have the primary responsibility for the investigation of transnational cybercrimes in the united states?
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's primary investigation division, HSI, is in charge of looking into threats and transnational crime.
What US legal act is utilized to investigate cases of intellectual property infringement?Federal protection under copyright law is given to "original works of authorship," which include computer software, literary works, musical compositions, and motion pictures, against infringement of certain exclusive rights, such as reproduction and distribution.
What name is given to someone who performs investigations, including forensic analyses, on behalf of individuals or organizations?A private investigator (commonly reduced to PI and colloquially known as a private eye), a private detective, or an inquiry agent is someone who can be hired by individuals or groups to do investigative legal services.
To know more about U.S. Department of Homeland Security's visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/28882571
#SPJ1
Match the British imperial economic policy to the correct definition.*law requiring that all goods imported to or exported from Britain be carried only on British ships*law requiring all shipments of goods from Europe to America to stop in Britain to be taxed*a period of loosely enforced trade restrictions in the American colonies*a political and economic policy enabling the government to take control of all economic activities*mercantilism*Navigation Act of 1651*salutary neglect*Staples Act
Mercantilism defines as a political and economic policy enabling the government to take control of all economic activities.
Navigation Act of 1651 propose that the law requiring that all goods imported to or exported from Britain be carried only on Britain ships.
Salutary neglect describes a period of loosely enforced trade restrictions in the American colonies.
Staples Act means that the law requiring all shipments of goods from Europe to America to stop in Britain to be taxed.
The British government enacted a number of policies to regulate trade, which required that all goods imported to or exported from Britain be carried only on British ships. Through the Staples Act the government would receive a portion of the profits from any trade between the American colonies and Europe.
To learn more about government click here https://brainly.com/question/13540610
#SPJ1
1. a theory that examines our societal norms and how we react when someone goes against those societal norms.
The theory that examines our societal norms and how we react when someone goes against those societal norms is the social norm theory.
The social norm theory is a theoretical perspective that examines how social norms and expectations impact our behavior, attitudes, and decision-making processes. According to the social norm theory, people are more likely to conform to group expectations and social norms when they believe that they are being watched or judged. It is assumed that our behavior is influenced by the perceived expectations of others and the potential for social approval or disapproval.
Social norms are a fundamental part of society, and they play a critical role in shaping behavior and attitudes. Social norms can be positive or negative, and they can vary from culture to culture. For example, some cultures may have social norms that emphasize individualism and personal freedom, while others may place a greater emphasis on collectivism and social harmony.
Overall, the social norm theory provides insights into how our behavior is influenced by our environment, social context, and cultural background. By understanding how social norms impact our decisions and behaviors, we can develop strategies for promoting positive social norms and encouraging individuals to behave in ways that align with social expectations.
You can learn more about social norms at: brainly.com/question/26998806
#SPJ11
Detective Smith wants to bring a forensic geologist to help her with her current case. Why does the detective most likely need assistance?
The detective most likely needs assistance from a forensic geologist because they specialize in studying and analyzing geological materials and processes that may be relevant to a crime scene.
Forensic geologists can help identify and analyze evidence such as soil, rocks, minerals, and other natural materials found at the scene of a crime. They can also help determine the origin and age of these materials, which can be useful in determining the timeline and location of events related to the crime. Additionally, a forensic geologist can provide valuable insight into natural disasters and other geological events that may have contributed to the crime or affected the evidence.
Learn more about detective
https://brainly.com/question/27524117
#SPJ4
biosocial criminologists explain gender differences in criminal involvement by arguing that there is something about gender itself that is responsible for the observed differences. True or False
The statement "biosocial criminologists explain gender differences in criminal involvement by arguing that there is something about gender itself that is responsible for the observed differences" is true. What are biosocial criminologists? Biosocial criminologists believe that biological, psychological, and social variables all play a role in criminal behavior.
This interdisciplinary approach is more sophisticated than the traditional nature/nurture debate in criminology. Because criminal behavior is caused by a combination of factors rather than a single cause, this approach is more comprehensive.
Gender differences in criminal involvement are one area that biosocial criminologists study. Gender Differences in Criminal Involvement: According to Biosocial Criminologists, Biosocial criminologists explain gender differences in criminal involvement by arguing that there is something about gender itself that is responsible for the observed differences.
They propose that some people are born with an innate proclivity to commit crimes, and that the sexes differ in this respect. Males are more likely than females to participate in criminal behavior, according to empirical data. Biosocial criminologists believe this is due to biological and social differences between the sexes.
For example, males have higher levels of testosterone than females, which is thought to contribute to their higher levels of aggression. Additionally, males are socialized to be more competitive and aggressive than females. As a result, males may be more inclined to engage in criminal behavior than females, according to biosocial criminologists.
To know more about Biosocial Criminologists refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30473576#
#SPJ11
the traditional system we now use contrasts with restorative justice in which of the following ways?
The traditional system we now use contrasts with restorative justice in The process ends with the victim living with the harm. thus Correct option (1)
Traditional systems are inspired by traditions and beliefs and focus on the fundamentals of products, services, and work. A centralized authority impacts command systems, but a market system is controlled by demand and supply factors. Finally, hybrid economies combine command and market systems.
A traditional economy is one that is based on traditions, history, and time-honored beliefs. Economic decisions such as production and distribution are influenced by tradition. Traditional economies rely on agriculture, fishing, hunting, gathering, or some mix of these activities.
Learn more about traditional system
https://brainly.com/question/14347199
#SPJ4
Full Question :The traditional system we now use contrasts with restorative justice in which of the following ways?
The process ends with the victim living with the harmThe approach wants to process nearly all offenders in the communityThe offender explains the circumstances that led to the crimeThe offender is reintegrated into the communityThese men argue that concepts such as individual freedom and democracy are so important, they are worth fighting for.
Values are important and not just abstract concepts for these men who argue that concepts such as individual freedom and democracy are so important, they are worth fighting for.
Individual freedom and democracy are two important factors of human society and are often the basis for how a society organizes itself and governs its people. Individual freedom gives people the right to decide for themselves to make choices without interference while democracy is a form of government in which the people have the right to choose their own leaders and make decisions about how their society is run. Hence these men wanted to argue that individuals must be willing to fight for these principles in order to ensure that their society is just, fair, and equal.
To learn more about democracy click here https://brainly.com/question/30812351
#SPJ1
complete question: For jake and Tyron, U.S. army veterans, _______ are not just abstract concepts. These men argue that concepts such as individual freedom and democracy are so important, they are worth fighting for.
Criteria Of 1. should have cover page 2.should have table of content 3. should have introduction 4. should have conclussion 5. should have reference Assignment
The criteria for a formal report or research paper requires that such work:
1. should have cover page2. should have table of content3. should have introduction4. should have conclusion5. should have referenceWhat is the criteria for a research work?A formal report or research paper should have a cover page that includes the title of the report or paper, the name of the author, the date, and other relevant information. It should also include a table of contents that lists the sections and subsections of the report or paper.
The report or paper should have an introduction that provides background information on the topic, the purpose of the report or paper, and the main points that will be discussed. The report or paper should also have a conclusion that summarizes the main points and provides recommendations or suggestions for further research. Finally, the report or paper should include a reference or works cited page that lists all the sources cited in the report or paper.
Read more about research work
brainly.com/question/26177190
#SPJ1
Traditional theories of judicial review hold that neutral or principled grounds are the only legitimate basis for judicial decisions and reject political motives in judicial decision making. Do you believe this is true? Do you see principled versus political motives in important U. S. Supreme Court constitutional decisions that overturn laws passed by legislatures
Classical models of judicial review typically stress the significance of impartial and ethical justifications in judicial deliberations.
Classical models of judicial review typically stress the significance of impartial and ethical justifications in judicial deliberations. According to these beliefs, judges should make decisions based on constitutional requirements and objective legal standards rather than on their own political or personal inclinations. To maintain the integrity and legitimacy of the judiciary, the concept is that judges should be unbiased and free from political influences. Not all academics or legal theorists, it should be noted, share this viewpoint.
Some contend that judges cannot totally free themselves from their own ideological or political biases since the law is fundamentally political. Others contend that a variety of elements, such as societal norms, popular opinion, and the larger political environment, have an impact on judicial rulings. There are alternative conceptions of judicial review as well, which may not always call for strict adherence to impartial or ethical principles.
For example, popular constitutionalism, which emphasises the influence of democratic and public procedures on constitutional interpretation and decision-making, has been promoted by some legal scholars. According to this strategy, judges should interpret the Constitution in light of current social and political circumstances and should pay close attention to how society's demands and ideals are changing.
Read more about traditional theories on:
https://brainly.com/question/8882847
#SPJ4
which of the following sections of the united states constitution is most related to the case marbury v. madison (1803) ?
The section of the United States Constitution that is most related to the case Marbury v. Madison (1803) is Article III, which establishes the judicial branch of the federal government. Marbury v.
Madison is a landmark case in American law that established the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. In the case, Chief Justice John Marshall argued that the Constitution grants the Supreme Court the power to interpret the law and determine the constitutionality of acts of Congress. This interpretation of the Constitution is rooted in Article III, which establishes the judicial branch as a co-equal branch of government with the power to interpret the law.
To know more about judicial click here:
brainly.com/question/30035277
#SPJ4
People perceive vertical and horizontal orientations more easily than other orientations according to the:
a) principle of size constancy.
b) oblique effect.
c) law of pragnanz.
d) law of good continuation.
People perceive vertical and horizontal orientations more easily than other orientations according to the oblique effect. (B)
The oblique effect is the phenomena that humans have more trouble perceiving stimuli that aren't straight up and down or side to side. The oblique effect is a phenomenon in perception science in which vertical and horizontal orientations are more quickly and accurately detected than oblique orientations.(B)
he oblique effect has been shown to be sensitive to many factors, including task, age, and visual experience. However, the origin of the oblique effect remains unknown.
In neuroscience, the oblique effect is described as the over-representation of vertical and horizontal orientations and a decrease in response to oblique orientations in cortical neurons.
To know more about oblique effect click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29140804#
#SPJ11
In a 2003 case involving admissions practices at the University of Michigan, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its decision Bakke by rejecting the use of___
In a 2003 case involving admissions practices at the University of Michigan, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its decision Bakke by rejecting the use of racial quotas.
The case, Grutter v. Bollinger, centered around the University of Michigan's law school's affirmative action program, which used race as a factor in admissions decisions. The Court upheld the constitutionality of the program, stating that a diverse student body is a compelling state interest in the context of higher education. However, the Court also noted that race cannot be the sole factor in admissions decisions and that universities must consider other factors as well. The decision affirmed the principle of affirmative action in higher education while also establishing limits on its implementation.
To learn more about Supreme Court visit;
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
a police officer who walks up and talks to a person standing on the street corner, questioning the person about his drug use, is engaged in
A police officer who walks up and talks to a person standing on the street corner, questioning the person about his drug use, is engaged in what is known as a Terry stop.
A Terry stop is a brief and limited investigative stop, named after the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio (1968), that allows police officers to temporarily detain and question a person based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. The officer may ask the person questions and request identification, but may only conduct a search if he or she has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed or a weapon is present. Terry stops are intended to help police officers investigate potential criminal activity while respecting the individual's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.
To know more about engaged click here:
brainly.com/question/30561114
#SPJ4
pie in the sky aircraft inc. files a suit against quest engineering inc., claiming that the consideration for their contract is inadequate. the court will most likely not examine the adequacy of the consideration if_____
The court will most likely not examine the adequacy of the consideration if the parties agreed to the contract voluntarily and without coercion.
When two parties enter into a contract with the intention of creating a binding agreement, it is assumed that both parties were aware of the terms and implications of the contract and therefore, the court will not question the adequacy of the consideration.
It is assumed that both parties negotiated in good faith and entered the contract voluntarily. If either party was coerced or forced into entering the contract, the adequacy of the consideration can be examined by the court.
Additionally, if the terms of the contract are unconscionable, the court can examine the adequacy of the consideration.
To know more about binding agreement click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29335454#
#SPJ11