The answer is , to represent this situation in a bar model, we can use a Clear frame model.
To show the situation where Kyle spends a total of $44 for four sweatshirts, with each sweatshirt costing the same amount of money, the bar model that can be used is a Clear frame model.
Here's an explanation of the solution:
Given, that Kyle spends a total of $44 for four sweatshirts and each sweatshirt costs the same amount of money.
To find how much each sweatshirt costs, divide the total amount spent by the number of sweatshirts.
So, the amount that each sweatshirt costs is:
[tex]\frac{44}{4}[/tex] = $11
Thus, each sweatshirt costs $11.
To represent this situation in a bar model, we can use a Clear frame model.
A Clear frame model is a bar model in which the total is shown in a separate section or box, and the bars are used to represent the parts of the whole.
To know more about Amount visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31035966
#SPJ11
Show that, except for 2 and 5, every prime can be expressed as 10k + 1, 10k + 3, 10k + 7 or 10k + 9 where k ∈ ℤ.
Every prime number except 2 and 5 can be expressed in the form of 10k+1, 10k+3, 10k+7, or 10k+9, where k is an integer.
To show that every prime number except 2 and 5 can be expressed in the form of 10k+1, 10k+3, 10k+7, or 10k+9, where k is an integer, we can use the following approach:
First, note that any integer can be written in one of the following forms:
10k
10k+1
10k+2
10k+3
10k+4
10k+5
10k+6
10k+7
10k+8
10k+9
Now, consider the prime numbers greater than 5. These primes must end in a digit other than 0, 2, 4, 5, 6, or 8, since otherwise they would be divisible by 2 or 5.
Thus, they can only end in 1, 3, 7, or 9. This means that every prime number greater than 5 must be of the form 10k+1, 10k+3, 10k+7, or 10k+9.
To see why, suppose a prime number greater than 5 ends in a digit x that is not 1, 3, 7, or 9. Then, we can write this number in the form 10k+x.
But this number is divisible by 2, since x is even, and therefore not prime. So every prime number greater than 5 must be of the form 10k+1, 10k+3, 10k+7, or 10k+9.
Therefore, we have shown that every prime number except 2 and 5 can be expressed in the form of 10k+1, 10k+3, 10k+7, or 10k+9, where k is an integer.
To know more about prime number refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30358834
#SPJ11
what is the p-value if, in a two-tailed hypothesis test , z stat = 1.49?
The p-value for a two-tailed hypothesis test with z stat = 1.49 is approximately 0.136.
What is the significance level of the test if the p-value is 0.136 for a two-tailed hypothesis test with z stat = 1.49?The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as the observed result, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
In this case, if the null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference between the observed result and the population mean, then the p-value of 0.136 suggests that there is a 13.6% chance of observing a difference as extreme as the one observed, given that the null hypothesis is true.
In statistical hypothesis testing, the p-value is used to determine the statistical significance of the results. If the p-value is less than or equal to the significance level, typically set at 0.05, then the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
In this case, the p-value is greater than 0.05, indicating that we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
Learn more about p-values
brainly.com/question/30078820
#SPJ11
Use mathematical induction to prove: nFor all integers n > 1, ∑ (5i – 4) = n(5n - 3)/2i=1
Mathematical induction, the statement is true for all integers n > 1. For this, we will start with
Base Case: When n = 2, we have:
∑(5i – 4) = 5(1) – 4 + 5(2) – 4 = 2(5*2 - 3)/2 = 7
So, the statement is true for n = 2.
Inductive Hypothesis: Assume that the statement is true for some positive integer k, i.e.,
∑(5i – 4) = k(5k - 3)/2 for k > 1.
Inductive Step: We need to show that the statement is also true for k + 1, i.e.,
∑(5i – 4) = (k + 1)(5(k+1) - 3)/2
Consider the sum:
∑(5i – 4) from i = 1 to k + 1
This can be written as:
(5(1) – 4) + (5(2) – 4) + ... + (5k – 4) + (5(k+1) – 4)
= ∑(5i – 4) from i = 1 to k + 5(k+1) – 4
= [∑(5i – 4) from i = 1 to k] + (5(k+1) – 4)
= k(5k - 3)/2 + 5(k+1) – 4 by the inductive hypothesis
= 5k^2 - 3k + 10k + 10 – 8
= 5k^2 + 7k + 2
= (k+1)(5(k+1) - 3)/2
So, the statement is true for k + 1.
Therefore, by mathematical induction, the statement is true for all integers n > 1.
To know more about mathematical induction refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29503103?#
#SPJ11
Consider the initial value problem
y′′+4y=−, y(0)=y0, y′(0)=y′0.y′′+4y=e−t, y(0)=y0, y′(0)=y0′.
Suppose we know that y()→0y(t)→0 as →[infinity]t→[infinity]. Determine the solution and the initial conditions.
The solution to the initial value problem is:
[tex]y(t) = -(1/6)\times sin(2t) - (1/3)*e^{-t} .[/tex]
The characteristic equation for the homogeneous equation y'' + 4y = 0 is [tex]r^2 + 4 = 0,[/tex]
which has complex roots r = ±2i.
Therefore, the general solution to the homogeneous equation is[tex]y_h(t) = c_1cos(2t) + c_2sin(2t).[/tex]
To find a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation [tex]y'' + 4y = -e^{-t} ,[/tex] we can use the method of undetermined coefficients. Since the right-hand side of the equation is an exponential function, we can guess a particular solution of the form [tex]y_p(t) = Ae^{-t} ,[/tex]
where A is a constant to be determined. Substituting this into the differential equation, we get:
[tex](-Ae^{-t}) + 4(Ae^{-t}) = -e^{-t}[/tex]
Solving for A, we get A = -1/3.
Therefore, the particular solution is [tex]y_p(t) = (-1/3)\times e^{-t} .[/tex]
The general solution to the nonhomogeneous equation is then [tex]y(t) = y_h(t) + y_p(t) = c_1cos(2t) + c_2sin(2t) - (1/3)\times e^{-t} .[/tex]
Using the initial conditions [tex]y(0) = y_0[/tex] and [tex]y'(0) = y_0'[/tex], we get:
[tex]y(0) = c_1 = y_0[/tex]
[tex]y'(0) = 2c_2 - (1/3) = y_0'[/tex]
Solving for[tex]c_2[/tex] , we get[tex]c_2 = (y_0' + 1/6).[/tex]
Therefore, the solution to the initial value problem is:
[tex]y(t) = y_0\times cos(2t) + (y_0' + 1/6)\times sin(2t) - (1/3)\times e^{-t}[/tex]
Note that since y(t) approaches 0 as t approaches infinity, we must have [tex]y_0 = 0[/tex] and[tex]y_0' = -1/6.[/tex] for the solution to satisfy the initial condition and the given limit.
For similar question on initial value.
https://brainly.com/question/514233
#SPJ11
evaluate the iterated integral. /4 0 5 0 y cos(x) dy dx
The value of the iterated integral /4 0 5 0 y cos(x) dy dx is 12.25sin(4). This means that the integral represents the signed volume of the region bounded by the xy-plane
To evaluate the iterated integral /4 0 5 0 y cos(x) dy dx, we first need to integrate with respect to y, treating x as a constant. The antiderivative of y with respect to y is (1/2)y^2, so we have:
∫cos(x)y dy = (1/2)cos(x)y^2
Next, we evaluate this expression at the limits of integration for y, which are 0 and 5. This gives us:
(1/2)cos(x)(5)^2 - (1/2)cos(x)(0)^2
= (1/2)cos(x)(25 - 0)
= (1/2)cos(x)(25)
Now, we need to integrate this expression with respect to x, treating (1/2)cos(x)(25) as a constant. The antiderivative of cos(x) with respect to x is sin(x), so we have:
∫(1/2)cos(x)(25) dx = (1/2)(25)sin(x)
Finally, we evaluate this expression at the limits of integration for x, which are 0 and 4. This gives us:
(1/2)(25)sin(4) - (1/2)(25)sin(0)
= (1/2)(25)sin(4)
= 12.25sin(4)
Therefore, the value of the iterated integral /4 0 5 0 y cos(x) dy dx is 12.25sin(4). This means that the integral represents the signed volume of the region bounded by the xy-plane, the curve y = 0, the curve y = 5, and the surface z = y cos(x) over the rectangular region R = [0,4] x [0,5].
Learn more on iterated integral here:
https://brainly.com/question/29632155
#SPJ11
Use appropriate algebra and Theorem 7.2.1 to find the given inverse Laplace transform. (Write your answer as a function of t.) L^-1 {7/s^2+25}
The inverse Laplace transform of the given function is f(t) = (7/5) * sin(5t).
To find the inverse Laplace transform of the given function, we will use the formula:
L-1 {F(s)} = (1/2πi) ∫C e(st) F(s) ds
Where C is a Bromwich contour, i is the imaginary unit and F(s) is the Laplace transform of the function we are interested in.
Using Theorem 7.2.1, we can express the given function as:
7/([tex]s^2[/tex]+[tex]5^2[/tex]) = 7/[tex]5^2[/tex] * 1/(1+(s/5)2)
This is the Laplace transform of the function f(t) = (7/5) e(-5t) sin(5t), according to Table 7.1.
Therefore, applying the inverse Laplace transform formula, we have:
= (1/2πi) ∫C e(st) [7/([tex]5^2[/tex])] [1/(1+(s/5)2)] ds
To evaluate this integral, we need to close the Bromwich contour C in the left half of the complex plane, since the function has poles at s = ±5i, which are located in the right half of the plane.
Therefore, we can use the residue theorem to obtain:
L-1 {7/([tex][tex]s^2[/tex][/tex]+52)} = (1/2πi) (2πi i/5) e(-5t) sin(5t)
= (1/5) e(-5t) sin(5t)
So the inverse Laplace transform of 7/(s2+25) is f(t) = (1/5) e^(-5t) sin(5t).
Therefore, the answer to this question is:
L^-1 {7/s^2+25} = (1/5) e(-5t) sin(5t)
The inverse Laplace transform of A/([tex]s^2[/tex] + [tex]w^2[/tex]) is given by (A/w) * sin(wt).
In this case, A=7 and w=5, so we can plug these values into the formula: L^(-1){7/(s^2+25)} = (7/5) * sin(5t).
For similar question on inverse Laplace
https://brainly.com/question/1675085
#SPJ11
To find the inverse Laplace transform of 7/(s^2 + 25), we first need to use appropriate algebra to simplify the expression. We can factor out a 7 from the numerator to get 7/(s^2 + 25).
Then, we can use Theorem 7.2.1 which states that the inverse Laplace transform of 1/(s^2 + a^2) is sin(at)/a. In our case, a = 5 (since a^2 = 25) and the inverse Laplace transform of 7/(s^2 + 25) is therefore 7sin(5t)/5. This function represents the time-domain response of the original Laplace-transformed signal.
To find the inverse Laplace transform of the given function, L^-1 {7/(s^2+25)}, we'll use appropriate algebra and Theorem 7.2.1, which states that the inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = k/(s^2 + k^2) is f(t) = sin(kt).
1. Identify the values of k and the constant in the given function. In this case, k^2 = 25, so k = 5. The constant is 7.
2. Apply Theorem 7.2.1 to the function. Since F(s) = 7/(s^2 + 25), the inverse Laplace transform f(t) = 7 * sin(5t).
So, the inverse Laplace transform of L^-1 {7/(s^2+25)} is f(t) = 7 * sin(5t).
Learn more about inverse Laplace transform here: brainly.com/question/31961546
#SPJ11
Mandy has a flower garden that is 30 1 2 square feet. She wants to plant daisies in 1 3 of the garden. What will the area of the daisy part of the garden be? Write and solve an equation that will help you figure out the area of the daisy section of the garden. Explain the steps you took to solve the problem
The equation x = 61/6 represents the area of the daisy section of the garden and the area of the daisy section of the garden will be 10 1/6 square feet.
To solve this problem, let's break it down step by step:
We know that Mandy's flower garden has an area of 30 1/2 square feet.
Mandy wants to plant daisies in 1/3 of the garden.
Let's assume the area of the daisy section is represented by x.
Since Mandy wants to plant daisies in 1/3 of the garden, we can set up the equation:
x = (1/3) × 30 1/2
Now, let's simplify the equation:
x = (1/3) × (61/2)
To multiply fractions, we multiply the numerators (1 × 61) and the denominators (3 × 2):
x = (61/6)
Simplifying further, we can express the mixed fraction as an improper fraction:
x = 10 1/6
Therefore, the area of the daisy section of the garden will be 10 1/6 square feet.
The equation x = 61/6 represents the area of the daisy section of the garden, and by solving it, we determined that the area is 10 1/6 square feet.
Learn more about improper fraction here:
https://brainly.com/question/21449807
#SPJ11
You have three grades in your report card that you want to interpret to your parents in terms of performance: Mathematics (75), English (85), and Science (90). The means are 72, 82, 88, and the standard deviations are 3, 10, 15, respectively. Is the information sufficient for you to compare your scores in each subject? If so, discuss the process. If not, explain why it is not possible
The means and standard deviations provided are enough to compare the scores in each subject by calculating their z-scores.
The information provided in the question is sufficient for you to compare your scores in each subject. To compare your scores in each subject, you would calculate the z-score for each of your grades. The z-score formula is (X - μ) / σ, where X is the grade, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.
After calculating the z-score for each subject, you can compare them to see which grade is above or below the mean. The z-scores can also tell you how far your grade is from the mean in terms of standard deviations. For example, a z-score of 1 means your grade is one standard deviation above the mean.
In conclusion, the means and standard deviations provided are enough to compare the scores in each subject by calculating their z-scores.
To know more about standard deviations visit:
brainly.com/question/29115611
#SPJ11
(2 points) (problem 4.62) if z is a standard normal random variable, what is (a) p(z2<1) .9172 (bp(z2<3.84146)
Based on your question, you want to find the probability of a standard normal random variable (z) satisfying certain conditions.
(a) To find the probability P(z^2 < 1), you need to determine the range of z that satisfies this condition. Since z^2 < 1 when -1 < z < 1, you are looking for P(-1 < z < 1). According to the standard normal table, this probability is approximately 0.6826.
(b) Similarly, for P(z^2 < 3.84146), you need to find the range of z that meets this condition. This occurs when -1.96 < z < 1.96 (rounded to two decimal places). Using the standard normal table, the probability is approximately 0.95.
Learn more about normal table: https://brainly.com/question/4079902
#SPJ11
You pick a number between 1000 and 5000. then you flip a coin. identify if the two events are independent or dependent. explain
The two events are independent.
To determine if the two events, picking a number between 1000 and 5000 and flipping a coin, are independent or dependent, we need to examine their relationship.
The events are independent if the outcome of one event does not affect the outcome of the other event.
In this case, picking a number between 1000 and 5000 has no influence on the outcome of flipping a coin, and flipping a coin does not affect the number you pick.
Therefore, these two events are independent.
To know more about independent events :
https://brainly.com/question/30905572#
#SPJ11
Reset Help NGC 4594 is an edge-on spiral with a large bulge. It does not show the bar and its arms are tightly wrapped, therefore it is an Sa galaxy. NGC 1300 is obviously a barred spiral. It is an SBb or SBc galaxy, given how tightly its spiral arms are wrapped. NGC 4414 is a face-on spiral galaxy. It does not have a bar, its bulge is not very large, and its spiral arms are not very tight. It should be Sc or Sb galaxy. M101 is a tilted disk galaxy with a flocculent, discontinuous spiral arms. It does not have a bar, and its bulge is not very large. It should be Sc or Sb galaxy MB7 is an elliptical galaxy. It is pretty round so it is probably an E0 galaxy. Submit Previous Answers Request Answer X Incorrect; Try Again; 5 attempts remaining You filled in 2 of 5 blanks incorrectly.
NGC 4594 is classified as an Sa galaxy due to its tightly wrapped arms and large bulge. It is an edge-on spiral, but does not display a bar. NGC 1300, on the other hand, is a barred spiral galaxy with tightly wrapped arms.
NGC 4414 is a face-on spiral galaxy with no bar, a relatively small bulge, and moderately wrapped spiral arms, indicating that it could be either an Sb or Sc galaxy.
M101 is a tilted disk galaxy featuring flocculent, discontinuous spiral arms. It lacks a bar and has a small bulge, suggesting it is also either an Sb or Sc galaxy. It is classified as an SBb or SBc galaxy. NGC 4414 is a face-on spiral galaxy without a bar and with a relatively small bulge. Its spiral arms are also not tightly wrapped, leading to a classification of Sc or Sb. M101 is a tilted disk galaxy with flocculent, discontinuous spiral arms. It lacks a bar and has a relatively small bulge, indicating a classification of Sc or Sb. Finally, MB7 is an elliptical galaxy that appears round, likely making it an E0 galaxy.NGC 4594 is an edge-on spiral galaxy with a large bulge. It does not show the bar, and its arms are tightly wrapped, making it an Sa galaxy. NGC 1300 is a barred spiral galaxy, classified as either SBb or SBc, depending on how tightly its spiral arms are wrapped.MB7 is an elliptical galaxy with a round shape, which is typical of an E0 galaxy classification.Know more about the elliptical galaxy
https://brainly.com/question/28945076
#SPJ11
A particle starts at the origin with initial velocity i- j + 3k. Its acceleration is a(t) = 6ti + 128"j - 6tk. Find the position function.
The position function is r(t) = t^3 i + (64/3)t^3 j - t^3 k.
We can integrate the acceleration function to obtain the velocity function:
v(t) = ∫ a(t) dt = 3t^2 i + 64t^2 j - 3t^2 k + C1
We can use the initial velocity to find the value of the constant C1:
v(0) = i - j + 3k = C1
So, v(t) = 3t^2 i + 64t^2 j - 3t^2 k + i - j + 3k = (3t^2 + 1)i + (64t^2 - 1)j + (3 - 3t^2)k
We can integrate the velocity function to obtain the position function:
r(t) = ∫ v(t) dt = t^3 i + (64/3)t^3 j - t^3 k + C2
We can use the initial position to find the value of the constant C2:
r(0) = 0 = C2
So, the position function is:
r(t) = t^3 i + (64/3)t^3 j - t^3 k
Learn more about position here
https://brainly.com/question/30685477
#SPJ11
What integer represents the output of this function for an input of -2?
The given function is: y = 3x - 1. To determine the output for an input of -2, we need to substitute -2 for x in the equation and simplify.
Therefore: y = 3(-2) - 1y = -6 - 1y = -7Thus, the output of the function for an input of -2 is -7.An integer is a whole number that can be positive, negative, or zero, but not a fraction or a decimal. To answer this question, we have to use the formula for a linear function as given and solve it to get the answer.The formula for a linear function is:y = mx + bwhere m is the slope of the line, b is the y-intercept, and x is the independent variable.
Therefore, we can solve the problem as follows:Given:y = 3x - 1To find the output for an input of -2, we substitute -2 for x:y = 3(-2) - 1y = -7Hence, the integer that represents the output of the function for an input of -2 is -7.
To know more about fraction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10354322
#SPJ11
: calculate the linear regression for the following points. plot the points and the linear regression line. (1, 1) (2, 3) (4, 5) (5, 4)
The linear regression for the given points is y = 0.7x + 0.9.
To calculate the linear regression, we need to find the equation of the line that best fits the given data points. The equation of a line is typically represented as y = mx + b, where m is the slope of the line and b is the y-intercept.
Let's calculate the slope, m, and the y-intercept, b, using the given data points (1, 1), (2, 3), (4, 5), and (5, 4).
Step 1: Calculate the mean values of x and y.
x bar = (1 + 2 + 4 + 5) / 4 = 3
y bar = (1 + 3 + 5 + 4) / 4 = 3.25
Step 2: Calculate the differences between each x-value and the mean of x (x - x bar) and the differences between each y-value and the mean of y (y - y bar).
(1 - 3) = -2
(2 - 3) = -1
(4 - 3) = 1
(5 - 3) = 2
(1 - 3.25) = -2.25
(3 - 3.25) = -0.25
(5 - 3.25) = 1.75
(4 - 3.25) = 0.75
Step 3: Calculate the sums of the products of the differences (x - x bar) and (y - y bar) and the sums of the squares of the differences (x - x bar)².
Σ((x - x bar)(y - y bar)) = (-2)(-2.25) + (-1)(-0.25) + (1)(1.75) + (2)(0.75) = 7.5
Σ((x - x bar)²) = (-2)² + (-1)² + (1)² + (2)² = 10
Step 4: Calculate the slope, m, using the formula:
m = Σ((x - x bar)(y - y bar)) / Σ((x - x bar)²) = 7.5 / 10 = 0.75
Step 5: Calculate the y-intercept, b, using the formula:
b = y bar - m * x bar = 3.25 - (0.75)(3) = 0.75
Therefore, the equation of the linear regression line is y = 0.75x + 0.75.
Now, we can plot the given points (1, 1), (2, 3), (4, 5), and (5, 4) on a graph and draw the linear regression line y = 0.75x + 0.75. The line will approximate the trend of the data points and show the relationship between x and y.
To learn more about linear regression, click here: brainly.com/question/30511665
#SPJ11
Khalid is solving the equation 8. 5 - 1. 2y = 6. 7. He gets to 1. 8 = 1. 2y. Explain what he might have done to get to this equation. I
So, Khalid might have simplified 8.5 - 6.7 to get 1.8, then simplified 1.2y to y, and then divided both sides of the equation by 1.2 to solve for y.
Khalid is solving the equation 8.5 - 1.2y = 6.7. He gets to 1.8 = 1.2y.
To get to this equation, Khalid might have done the following:
Solving the equation 8.5 - 1.2y = 6.7, we have:
8.5 - 6.7 = 1.2y
Subtracting 6.7 from both sides, we get:
1.8 = 1.2y
Dividing both sides by 1.2, we have:
1.5 = y
So, Khalid might have simplified 8.5 - 6.7 to get 1.8, then simplified 1.2y to y, and then divided both sides of the equation by 1.2 to solve for y.
To know more about equation please visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29174899
#SPJ11
A scientist wants to round 20 measurements to the nearest whole number. Let C1, C2, ..., C20 be independent Uniform(-.5, .5) random variables to indicate the rounding error from each measurement.
a. Suppose we are interested in the absolute cumulative error from rounding, which is | C1 + C2+...+C20 |. Use Chebyshev's Inequality to bound the probability that the absolute cumulative rounding error is at least 2.
.b Use the Central Limit Theorem to approximate the same probability from a. Provide a final numerical answer.
c. Find the absolute rounding error of a single measurement D = | C | where C ~ Unif(-.5,.5). Find the PDF of D and state the support
Therefore, the probability that the absolute cumulative rounding error is at least 2 is bounded by 5/12. Therefore, the probability that the absolute cumulative rounding error is at least 2, as approximated by the Central Limit Theorem, is approximately 0.0456.
a. Chebyshev's Inequality states that for any random variable X with finite mean μ and variance σ^2, the probability of X deviating from its mean by more than k standard deviations is bounded by 1/k^2. In this case, the random variable we are interested in is the absolute cumulative rounding error, |C1 + C2 + ... + C20|, which has mean 0 and variance Var(|C1 + C2 + ... + C20|) = Var(C1) + Var(C2) + ... + Var(C20) = 20/12 = 5/3. Using Chebyshev's Inequality with k = 2 standard deviations, we have:
P(|C1 + C2 + ... + C20| ≥ 2) ≤ Var(|C1 + C2 + ... + C20|) / (2^2)
P(|C1 + C2 + ... + C20| ≥ 2) ≤ 5/12
b. According to the Central Limit Theorem, the sum of independent and identically distributed random variables, such as C1, C2, ..., C20, will be approximately normally distributed as the sample size increases. Since each Ci has mean 0 and variance 1/12, the sum S = C1 + C2 + ... + C20 has mean 0 and variance Var(S) = 20/12 = 5/3. Using the standard normal distribution to approximate S, we have:
P(|S| ≥ 2) ≈ P(|Z| ≥ 2) = 2P(Z ≤ -2) ≈ 2(0.0228) ≈ 0.0456
where Z is a standard normal random variable and we have used a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find P(Z ≤ -2) ≈ 0.0228.
To know more about probability,
https://brainly.com/question/30034780
#SPJ11
How can the product of 5 and 0. 3 be determined using this number line?
Number line from 0 to 2. 0 with tick marks at every tenth. An arrow goes from 0 to 0. 3.
Enter your answers in the boxes.
Make
jumps that are each unit long. You end at, which is the product of 5 and 0. 3
Given that we need to determine how the product of 5 and 0.3 can be determined using a given number line.From the given number line, we can observe that 0.3 is located at 3 tenths on the number line, we know that 5 is a whole number.
Therefore, the product of 5 and 0.3 can be determined by multiplying 5 by the distance between 0 and 0.3 on the number line. Each tick mark on the number line represents 0.1 units. So, the distance between 0 and 0.3 is 3 tenths or 0.3 units.
Therefore, the product of 5 and 0.3 is:5 × 0.3 = 1.5.The endpoint of the arrow that starts from 0 and ends at 0.3 indicates the value 0.3 on the number line. Therefore, the endpoint of an arrow that starts from 0 and ends at the product of 5 and 0.3, which is 1.5, can be obtained by making five jumps that are each unit long. This endpoint is represented by the tick mark that is 1.5 units away from 0 on the number line.
Know more about determine how the product of 5 and 0.3 here:
https://brainly.com/question/18886013
#SPJ11
Create an expression without parentheses that is equivalent to 5(3y + 2y).
To express the expression 5(3y + 2y) without parentheses, we can use the distributive property of multiplication over addition. The equivalent expression is 5 * 3y + 5 * 2y.
The distributive property states that when a number is multiplied by the sum of two terms, it is equivalent to multiplying the number separately with each term and then adding the results. In the given expression, we have 5 multiplied by the sum of 3y and 2y.
To eliminate the parentheses, we can apply the distributive property by multiplying 5 with each term individually. This results in 5 * 3y + 5 * 2y. Simplifying further, we get 15y + 10y.
Combining like terms, we add the coefficients of the y terms, which gives us 25y. Therefore, the expression 5(3y + 2y) without parentheses is equivalent to 25y. This simplification follows the rule of distributing multiplication over addition, allowing us to express the expression in a different but equivalent form.
Learn more about distributive property here:
https://brainly.com/question/30321732
#SPJ11
How may 12-digit binary sequences are there in which no two Os occur consecutively? 610 377 2¹2/2 2¹2
The total number of 12-digit binary sequences that have no two 0s occurring consecutively is a(12) + b(12).
To count the number of 12-digit binary sequences where no two 0s occur consecutively, we can use a recursive approach.
Let a(n) be the number of n-digit binary sequences that end in 1 and have no two 0s occurring consecutively, and let b(n) be the number of n-digit binary sequences that end in 0 and have no two 0s occurring consecutively.
We can then obtain the total number of n-digit binary sequences that have no two 0s occurring consecutively by adding a(n) and b(n).
For n = 1, we have:
a(1) = 0 (since there are no 1-digit binary sequences that end in 1 and have no two 0s occurring consecutively)
b(1) = 1 (since there is only one 1-digit binary sequence that ends in 0)
For n = 2, we have:
a(2) = 1 (since the only 2-digit binary sequence that ends in 1 and has no two 0s occurring consecutively is 01)
b(2) = 1 (since the only 2-digit binary sequence that ends in 0 and has no two 0s occurring consecutively is 10)
For n > 2, we can obtain a(n) and b(n) recursively as follows:
a(n) = b(n-1) (since an n-digit binary sequence that ends in 1 and has no two 0s occurring consecutively must end in 01, and the last two digits of the previous sequence must be 10)
b(n) = a(n-1) + b(n-1) (since an n-digit binary sequence that ends in 0 and has no two 0s occurring consecutively can end in either 10 or 00, and the last two digits of the previous sequence must be 01 or 00)
Using these recursive formulas, we can calculate a(12) and b(12) as follows:
a(3) = b(2) = 1
b(3) = a(2) + b(2) = 2
a(4) = b(3) = 2
b(4) = a(3) + b(3) = 3
a(5) = b(4) = 3
b(5) = a(4) + b(4) = 5
a(6) = b(5) = 5
b(6) = a(5) + b(5) = 8
a(7) = b(6) = 8
b(7) = a(6) + b(6) = 13
a(8) = b(7) = 13
b(8) = a(7) + b(7) = 21
a(9) = b(8) = 21
b(9) = a(8) + b(8) = 34
a(10) = b(9) = 34
b(10) = a(9) + b(9) = 55
a(11) = b(10) = 55
b(11) = a(10) + b(10) = 89
a(12) = b(11) = 89
b(12) = a(11) + b(11) = 144
Therefore, the total number of 12-digit binary sequences that have no two 0s occurring consecutively is a(12) + b(12) =
Learn more about binary sequences here
https://brainly.com/question/26618884
#SPJ11
Which of the following are proper fractions? 5/3 1/8 4/5 10/7
Answer:
1/8 and 4/5
Step-by-step explanation:
A proper fraction is a fraction that is less than one, or said a different way, the numerator is less than the denominator.
So 1/8, 4/5 are both proper. The others are improper.
Ms Lethebe, a grade 11 tourism teacher, bought fifteen 2 litre bottle of cold drink for 116
learners who went for an excursion. She used a 250 ml cup to measure the drink poured for
each learner. She was assisted by a grade 12 learner in pouring the drinks.
1 cup =250ml and 1litre -1000ml
1. 2 an assisting learners got two thirds of the cup from Ms Lebethe. Calculate the difference in
amount of cool drink received by a grade 11 learner and assisted learners in milliliters.
The difference in the amount of cold drink received by a grade 11 learner and assisting learners in milliliters is 324.14 ml.
Ms Lethebe purchased 15 two-litre bottles of cold drink for 116 learners who went on an excursion. She used a 250 ml cup to measure the drink poured for each learner. One cup = 250 ml, and 1 liter = 1000 ml.
If Ms Lethebe gave 2/3 cup to the assisting learners, we need to calculate the difference in the amount of cold drink that the grade 11 learners and the assisting learners received.
Let the volume of cold drink received by each grade 11 learner be "x" ml, and the volume of cold drink received by each assisting learner be "y" ml. Then, we can use the following equations:x × 116 = 15 × 2 × 1000, since Ms Lethebe purchased 15 two-litre bottles of cold drink.
This simplifies to:x = 325.86 ml per grade 11 learnery × 2/3 × 116 = 15 × 2 × 1000, since the assisting learners received 2/3 cup from Ms Lethebe. This simplifies to:y = 650 ml per assisting learner
Therefore, the difference in the amount of cold drink received by a grade 11 learner and assisting learners in milliliters is:y - x = 650 - 325.86 = 324.14 ml
Therefore, the difference in the amount of cold drink received by a grade 11 learner and assisting learners in milliliters is 324.14 ml.
Know more about volume here,
https://brainly.com/question/28058531
#SPJ11
use a maclaurin series in this table to obtain the maclaurin series for the given function. f(x) = 7 cos x 2 [infinity] n = 0
The Maclaurin series for [tex]\(f(x) = 7\cos\left(\frac{\pi x}{5}\right)\)[/tex]is:
[tex]\[f(x) = 7 - \frac{49\pi^2}{2\cdot 5^2}x^2 + \frac{49\pi^4}{4!\cdot 5^4}x^4 - \frac{49\pi^6}{6!\cdot 5^6}x^6 + \dotsb\][/tex]
To obtain the Maclaurin series for the function [tex]\(f(x) = 7\cos\left(\frac{\pi x}{5}\right)\)[/tex], we can substitute the Maclaurin series for [tex]\(\cos x\)[/tex] into the given function.
The Maclaurin series for [tex]\(\cos x\)[/tex] is given by:
[tex]\[\cos x = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n \frac{x^{2n}}{(2n)!} = 1 - \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^4}{4!} - \frac{x^6}{6!} + \dotsb\][/tex]
Substituting [tex]\(x\)[/tex] with [tex]\(\frac{\pi x}{5}\)[/tex] in the above series, we get:
[tex]\[\cos\left(\frac{\pi x}{5}\right) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n \frac{\left(\frac{\pi x}{5}\right)^{2n}}{(2n)!} = 1 - \frac{(\pi x)^2}{2!\cdot 5^2} + \frac{(\pi x)^4}{4!\cdot 5^4} - \frac{(\pi x)^6}{6!\cdot 5^6} + \dotsb\][/tex]
Finally, multiplying the series by 7 to obtain the Maclaurin series for [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex], we have:
[tex]\[f(x) = 7\cos\left(\frac{\pi x}{5}\right) = 7\left(1 - \frac{(\pi x)^2}{2!\cdot 5^2} + \frac{(\pi x)^4}{4!\cdot 5^4} - \frac{(\pi x)^6}{6!\cdot 5^6} + \dotsb\right)\][/tex]
Therefore, the Maclaurin series for [tex]\(f(x)\)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[f(x) = 7 - \frac{49\pi^2}{2\cdot 5^2}x^2 + \frac{49\pi^4}{4!\cdot 5^4}x^4 - \frac{49\pi^6}{6!\cdot 5^6}x^6 + \dotsb\][/tex]
The complete question must be:
Use a Maclaurin series in the table below to obtain the Maclaurin series for the given function.
[tex]$$\begin{aligned}& f(x)=7 \cos \left(\frac{\pi x}{5}\right) \\& f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \\& \frac{1}{1-x}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^n=1+x+x^2+x^3+\cdots & R=1 \\& e^x=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n !}=1+\frac{x}{1 !}+\frac{x^2}{2 !}+\frac{x^3}{3 !}+\cdots & R=\infty \\\end{aligned}$$[/tex]
[tex]$$\begin{aligned}& \sin x=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n \frac{x^{2 n+1}}{(2 n+1) !}=x-\frac{x^3}{3 !}+\frac{x^5}{5 !}-\frac{x^7}{7 !}+\cdots & R=\infty \\& \cos x=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n \frac{x^{2 n}}{(2 n) !}=1-\frac{x^2}{2 !}+\frac{x^4}{4 !}-\frac{x^6}{6 !}+\cdots & R=\infty \\\end{aligned}$$[/tex]
[tex]$$\begin{aligned}& \tan ^{-1} x=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n \frac{x^{2 n+1}}{2 n+1}=x-\frac{x^3}{3}+\frac{x^5}{5}-\frac{x^7}{7}+\cdots & R=1 \\& (1+x)^k=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\begin{array}{l}k \\n\end{array}\right) x^n=1+k x+\frac{k(k-1)}{2 !} x^2+\frac{k(k-1)(k-2)}{3 !} x^3+\cdots \quad R=1 \\&\end{aligned}$$[/tex]
Learn more about Maclaurin series:
https://brainly.com/question/31745715
#SPJ11
OAB is a minor sector of the circle below.
Calculate the length of the minor arc AB.
Give your answer in centimetres (cm) to 1 d.p.
A to B
40°
A to O
19 cm
To one decimal place, the minor arc of AB measures 12.006 cm.
To calculate the length of the minor arc AB, we must find the circumference of the entire circle and then determine what fraction of the circumference the arc AB represents.
Since the radius of the circle is equal to AO, which is 19 cm, we can use the formula for the circumference of a circle:
C = 2πr
Substituting the radius value, we get:
C = 2π * 19 cm
Now to find the length of the lateral arc AB, we must calculate what fraction of the circumference is represented by the central angle of 40°.
The central angle AB is 40°, and since the central angle of a full circle is 360°, the fraction of the circumference represented by the smaller arc AB can be calculated as:
Part of a circumference = (40° / 360°)
To find out the length of the small arc AB, we multiply the fraction of the circumference by the total circumference of the circle:
AB's minor arc length is equal to the product of the circumference and its fraction.
AB's short arc's length is equal to (40°/360°) * (2 * 19 cm).
The length of the small arc AB ≈ 0.1111 * (2π * 19 cm)
The length of the small arc AB is ≈ 12.006 cm
Therefore, the length of the lower arc AB is approximately 12.006 cm to one decimal place.
For more question on minor arc visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28980798
#SPJ8
the real distance between a village shop and a park is 1.2 km. the distance between them on a map is 4cm. what is the scale of the map? write your answer as a ratio in it simplest form.
The scale of this map is 0.3km = 1cm, written as a ratio 10cm to 3km
What is the scale of the map?The scale on the map is a relation that tells us how many kilometers are represented by each centimeter on the map.
Here we know that the real distance between a village shop and a park is 1.2 km, while the distance between them on a map is 4cm, then we can write the relation:
1.2 km = 4cm
Dividing both sides by 4, we will get:
(1.2 km)/4 = 4cm/4
0.3km = 1cm
That is the relation, written this as a ratio we will get:
4cm to 1.2km
Multiply both sides by 5
5*4cm to 5*1.2 km
20cm to 6km
Now divide both sides by 2:
10cm to 3km
Learn more about scales at:
https://brainly.com/question/105644
#SPJ1
Consider the sequence k+2 = 3£k+1 – 22k for k≥ 0. Starting with an initial condition to = 0, x1 = 1, compute x6з by finding a general formula for x in terms of the initial conditions.
Hint: There are more than one ways to answer this question. One way would be to start by defining a vector vo= [xo/x1] and a matrix such that Αv0 [X1/X2] =
then, compute x63 by first finding the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A and maybe diagonalizing A.
The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A and maybe diagonalizing A is 10.2889.
The given sequence:
k + 2 = 3k + 1 - 22k
k + 2 = -19k + 1
20k = 1
k = 1/20
So, the general formula for the sequence is:
xk = [tex]3^{(k-1)} - 22k/20[/tex]
Using the initial conditions x0 = 0 and x1 = 1, we can find the values of the constants C1 and C2 in the general formula:
x0 = C1 + C2 = 0
x1 = [tex]3^0 - 22/20[/tex]
= 1
Solving for C1 and C2, we get:
C1 = -1/20
C2 = 1/20
So, the general formula for the sequence with the given initial conditions is:
xk = [tex]3^{(k-1)} - 22k/20 - 1/20[/tex]
To compute x63, we can simply substitute k = 63 in the formula:
x63 = 3⁶³ - 22(63)/20 - 1/20
x63 = 1.631038 × 10¹⁸
For similar questions on values
https://brainly.com/question/843074
#SPJ11
find the lengths of the sides of the triangle with the vertices a(2,−1,4), b(−2,3,9), and c(6,4,8).
The lengths of the sides of the triangle with vertices A(2,-1,4), B(-2,3,9), and C(6,4,8) are approximately 10.63, 7.07, and 7.81 units.
To find the lengths of the sides of the triangle, we can use the distance formula in three-dimensional space. The distance formula is derived from the Pythagorean theorem, where the distance between two points P(x₁, y₁, z₁) and Q(x₂, y₂, z₂) is given by:
d(PQ) = √((x₂ - x₁)² + (y₂ - y₁)² + (z₂ - z₁)²)
Applying this formula to our triangle, we can calculate the lengths of the sides as follows:
1. Side AB:
AB = √((-2 - 2)² + (3 - (-1))² + (9 - 4)²)
= √((-4)² + (4)² + (5)²)
≈ √(16 + 16 + 25)
≈ √57
≈ 7.55 units (rounded to two decimal places)
2. Side BC:
BC = √((6 - (-2))² + (4 - 3)² + (8 - 9)²)
= √((8)² + (1)² + (-1)²)
≈ √(64 + 1 + 1)
≈ √66
≈ 8.12 units (rounded to two decimal places)
3. Side CA:
CA = √((6 - 2)² + (4 - (-1))² + (8 - 4)²)
= √((4)² + (5)² + (4)²)
≈ √(16 + 25 + 16)
≈ √57
≈ 7.55 units (rounded to two decimal places)
Therefore, the lengths of the sides of the triangle ABC are approximately 7.55, 8.12, and 7.55 units.
Learn more about Pythagorean theorem here: https://brainly.com/question/14930619
#SPJ11
During the month of June, the mixing department produced and transferred out 3,500 units. Ending work in process had 1,000 units, 40 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. There was no beginning work in process. The equivalent units of output for conversion costs for the month of June are:
a. 3,500
b. 4,500
c. 3,900
d. 1,000
The equivalent units of output for conversion costs for the month of June are C. 3,900.
During the month of June, the mixing department produced and transferred out 3,500 units. Additionally, there were 1,000 units in ending work in process that was 40 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. To calculate the equivalent units of output for conversion costs, we need to consider both completed and partially completed units.
First, we account for the completed and transferred out units, which amounts to 3,500 units. Next, we need to determine the equivalent units for the partially completed units in the ending work in process.
Since these 1,000 units are 40 percent complete in terms of conversion costs, we multiply the number of units (1,000) by the completion percentage (40% or 0.4):
1,000 units × 0.4 = 400 equivalent units
Now, we can add the equivalent units for completed and partially completed units together:
3,500 units (completed) + 400 equivalent units (partially completed) = 3,900 equivalent units
Therefore, the equivalent units of output for conversion costs for the month of June are 3,900. Therefore, the correct option is C.
Know more about Conversion costs here:
https://brainly.com/question/30049043
#SPJ11
Find the inverse Laplace transform f(t) = L^-1 {F(s)} of the function F(s) = 5s + 1/s^2 + 36
f(t) = L^-1 { 5s + 1 / s^2 + 36} = _______
The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) is:
f(t) = L⁻¹ {F(s)} = L⁻¹ {5s/(s² + 36)} + L⁻¹ {1/(s² + 36)}
= 5 cos(6t) + (1/6) sin(6t)
Partial fraction decomposition and the inverse Laplace transform of each term to the inverse Laplace transform of the function F(s):
F(s) = 5s + 1/(s² + 36)
= (5s)/(s² + 36) + 1/(s² + 36)
The first term has the Laplace transform:
L⁻¹ {5s/(s² + 36)}
= 5 cos(6t)
The second term has the Laplace transform:
L⁻¹ {1/(s² + 36)}
= (1/6) sin(6t)
The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) is:
f(t) = L⁻¹ {F(s)} = L⁻¹ {5s/(s² + 36)} + L⁻¹ {1/(s² + 36)}
= 5 cos(6t) + (1/6) sin(6t)
f(t) = 5 cos(6t) + (1/6) sin(6t).
For similar questions on inverse Laplace transform
https://brainly.com/question/27753787
#SPJ11
The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = 5s + 1/(s^2 + 36) is f(t) = 5cos(6t) + (1/6)sin(6t).
To find the inverse Laplace transform of F(s), we need to decompose the function into simpler components that have known Laplace transform pairs.
In this case, we have F(s) = 5s + 1/(s^2 + 36). The first term, 5s, corresponds to the Laplace transform of the function 5t. The Laplace transform of t is 1/s^2. Therefore, the Laplace transform of 5t is 5/s^2.
The second term, 1/(s^2 + 36), represents the Laplace transform of sin(6t). The Laplace transform of sin(6t) is 6/(s^2 + 36).
By applying linearity properties of the Laplace transform, we can write the inverse Laplace transform of F(s) as f(t) = L^-1 {5/s^2} + L^-1 {6/(s^2 + 36)}.
The inverse Laplace transform of 5/s^2 is 5t, and the inverse Laplace transform of 6/(s^2 + 36) is (1/6)sin(6t).
Therefore, the inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = 5s + 1/(s^2 + 36) is f(t) = 5t + (1/6)sin(6t).
To learn more about inverse Laplace transform click here
brainly.com/question/13263485
#SPJ11
A snail is traveling along a straight path. The snail's velocity can be modeled by v(t) = 1.4 In 1 +r?) inches per minute for 0 Sis 15 minutes. (a) Find the acceleration of the snail at time t = 5 minutes. (b) What is the displacement of the snail over the interval 0 Sis 15 minutes? (c) At what time 1, OSIS 15, is the snail's instantaneous velocity equal to its average velocity over the interval OSIS 15 ? (d) An ant arrives at the snail's starting position at time i = 12 minutes and follows the snail's path. During the interval 12 s1 s 15 minutes, the ant travels in the same direction as the snail with a constant acceleration of 2 inches per minute per minute. The ant catches up to the snail at time t = 15 minutes. The ant's velocity at time 1 = 12 is B inches per minute. Find the value of B.
The acceleration of the snail at time t=5 minutes can be found by taking the derivative of the velocity function v(t) with respect to time t. When the ant catches up to the snail at time t = 15, their displacements are equal, so we have s(15) - s(12) = v_ant(12)(15-12).
(a) The acceleration of the snail at time t=5 minutes can be found by taking the derivative of the velocity function v(t) with respect to time t. Thus, we have a(t) = v'(t) = 1.4/(1+e^(1.4t))^2 * 1.4 = 1.96/(1+e^(1.4t))^2 evaluated at t=5. Plugging in t=5, we get a(5) = 0.0935 inches per minute per minute.
(b) The displacement of the snail over the interval 0 <= t <= 15 minutes can be found by integrating the velocity function v(t) with respect to time t. Thus, we have s(t) = ∫v(t)dt = 1.4ln(1+e^(1.4t)) evaluated from t=0 to t=15. Plugging in these values, we get s(15) - s(0) = 9.335 inches.
(c) To find the time t when the snail's instantaneous velocity equals its average velocity over the interval 0 <= t <= 15 minutes, we need to solve the equation v(t) = (s(15)-s(0))/15. Substituting the expressions for v(t) and s(t), we get 1.4ln(1+e^(1.4t)) = 0.6223t + 0.6223. This equation cannot be solved analytically, so we can use numerical methods to approximate the solution.
(d) Since the snail and ant are traveling in the same direction, the displacement of the ant over the interval 12 <= t <= 15 minutes is equal to the displacement of the snail over the same interval. Thus, we can use the same formula for s(t) as in part (b). We know that the ant has a constant acceleration of 2 inches per minute per minute, so its velocity at time t = 12 is given by v_ant(12) = B + 2(12-12) = B. When the ant catches up to the snail at time t = 15, their displacements are equal, so we have s(15) - s(12) = v_ant(12)(15-12). Substituting the expressions for s(t) and v_ant(12), we get 1.4ln(1+e^(1.415)) - 1.4ln(1+e^(1.412)) = 3B. Solving for B, we get B = (1.4ln(1+e^(21))-1.4ln(1+e^(16)))/3.
Learn more about velocity function here:
https://brainly.com/question/29080451
#SPJ11
Evaluate integral (2x - y + 4) dx + (5y + 3x - 6)dy where C is the counterclockwise path around the triangle with; vertices (0, 0), (3,0) and (3,2) by (a) evaluating the line integral, and (b) using Green's Theorem.
To evaluate this line integral, we first need to parameterize the counterclockwise path around the triangle. We can do this by breaking the path into three line segments: from (0,0) to (3,0), from (3,0) to (3,2), and from (3,2) back to (0,0).
For the first segment, we can let x vary from 0 to 3 and y stay at 0. For the second segment, we can let y vary from 0 to 2 and x stay at 3. For the third segment, we can let x vary from 3 to 0 and y stay at 2.
Using these parameterizations, we can evaluate the line integral as follows:
∫(2x - y + 4) dx + (5y + 3x - 6)dy
= ∫[2x dx + (3x + 5y - 6)dy] - y dx
For the first segment, we have:
∫[2x dx + (3x + 5y - 6)dy] - y dx
= ∫[2x dx] - 0 = [x^2] from 0 to 3 = 9
For the second segment, we have:
∫[2x dx + (3x + 5y - 6)dy] - y dx
= ∫[(3x + 5y - 6)dy] - 0 = [3xy + (5/2)y² - 6y] from 0 to 2
= 6 + 10 - 12 = 4
For the third segment, we have:
∫[2x dx + (3x + 5y - 6)dy] - y dx
= ∫[2x dx] - 2 dx = [x² - 2x] from 3 to 0 = 3
So the total line integral is 9 + 4 + 3 = 16.
To use Green's Theorem, we first need to find the curl of the vector field:
curl(F) = (∂Q/∂x - ∂P/∂y)
= (3 - (-1))i + (2 - 2)j
= 4i
Next, we need to find the area enclosed by the triangle. This is a right triangle with base 3 and height 2, so the area is (1/2)(3)(2) = 3.
Finally, we can use Green's Theorem to find the line integral:
∫F · dr = ∫∫curl(F) dA
= ∫∫4 dA
= 4(area of triangle)
= 4(3)
= 12
So the line integral using Green's Theorem is 12.
In summary, we can evaluate the line integral around the counterclockwise path around the triangle with vertices (0, 0), (3,0), and (3,2) by either directly parameterizing and integrating, or by using Green's Theorem. The line integral evaluates to 16 by direct integration and 12 by Green's Theorem.
To know More about triangle visit:---
https://brainly.com/question/17335144
#SPJ11