Answer:
Naturalization Act of 1790 -- est standards for who could become an american citizen → caucasians only
Chinese Exclusion act of 1882 -- excluded Chinese laborers from entering US
Immigration Act of 1917 -- restricted immigation from Asia, created Asiatic Barred Zone
Explanation:
quizlet
The major three laws that targeted respective ethnic groups are the Naturalization Act of 1790, the Chinese exclusion act of 1882, and the Immigration Act of 1917.
What do you mean by laws?Laws refer to the rules, and practices that are binding for a society or a country.
The major three laws that specifically target ethnic groups are the Naturalization Act of 1790 which set standards for who can become a citizen of America.
Chinese exclusion act states the exclusions of Chinese laborers from entering the U.S and the immigration Act of 1917 restricts immigration from Asia creating an Asiatic barred zone.
Learn more about Laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ4
Are there exceptions to the rule that a defendant has a right to counsel at a lineup
Explanation:
There are no exceptions to the 6th amendment, that right can not be taken away from you no matter the circumstance, there are however, limitations. such as what an attorney may do for their defendants.
4. How are interviews and interrogations distinguished from each other?
Answer:
The goal of an interview is usually to get a job and have very reasonable and formal questions about one's expertise, such as why should we let you in on this job or what is your level of experience in this area of expertise. However, it can also be to film a documentary or get to know somebody better, and both are conducted by people who have interviewed people many times. Interrogations are also formal and performed by experts, but they are usually strict and operated as a punishment or asking questions with the consequence of a penalty if answered suspiciously or incorrectly.
You are charged with a crime in a very small, isolated town. You hire one of the two attorneys in town to defend you (the other one is his brother, the prosecutor). You ask for a jury trial, and they bring in four people to decide your fate. Are these four a legitimate jury?
In the given case, when an individual wants a jury trial, they summon four individuals to decide the destiny, these four are not a legitimate jury, as the jury should consist of six to twelve persons.
What is the significance of legitimate jury?The defense of debtor-defendants, defeating foolish legislation, upholding the rights of private persons in legal disputes with the government, and safeguarding litigants from overbearing and repressive judges were some of the justifications put out for civil jury trials.
Almost all juries are able to come to a unanimous decision. In some sorts of situations, it is a verdict that receives the support of 11 out of 12 jurors is admissible. A hung jury is one that cannot reach a consensus after the jury has deliberated or considered for numerous hours or days.
To learn more about the legitimate jury, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/9788151
#SPJ2
how do poverty affect right to education ?
Answer:
Poor people typically don't have enough money to educate their children very well. They might not have enough experience to go to a good college or a university, or any at all. This all means that unless they got a scholarship or something, they don't have much education and limited education rights.
Are there legal loopholes to avoid getting held back? My child is failing history and geometry and I don’t think she can pass by the end of the year. She is in 9th grade and has been to 3 different schools this year. She is currently in an Online school and will do public next year.
State of residence: South Carolina
Answer:
Explanation:
Legislation signed into law June 30 allows parents and students over 18 to decide for themselves whether they or their kids should repeat their 2020-21 grade. In other years, the decision to hold students back is made by school officials and teachers.
Which part of a supreme court decision presents the argument
Answer:
The part that presents the argument in opposition to the courts ruling is dissent.
Explanation:
Dissenting view refers to the judges' disagreement with public opinion. They also call it the report of a minority. There are different kinds of Dissenting opinions.
What do you mean by dissenting opinion?Dissenting opinions often occur when there is a consensus of part of the case.
A dissenting (or opposing) opinion is a legal opinion in certain legal cases written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the public opinion of the court that results in its decision.
Thus, Dissenting view part of a supreme court decision presents the argument.
To learn more about dissenting opinion:
https://brainly.com/question/11651416
#SPJ4
As a first responder, you don't have much control over the lamp color or the type of light on your response vehicles — those decisions are made by the state and by _________ administrators.
The decisions about control over the lamp color or the type of light are made by the state and by local administrators.
Who are administrators?Administrators are those in that make sure the set rules, regulations, orders and decisions are been maintained after they have been made.
They are agencies at federal level, state and local level.
Learn more about administrators at;
https://brainly.com/question/14364696
YOUR DECISION - As a defense attorney, your job is to create
reasonable doubt in the jurors' minds about Daniel's intent to lure
Christopher to his death. Besides the facts presented above, other
important details about this case include the following: (1) Jose, the
prosecution's main witness, was allowed to plead guilty to a lesser
charge of voluntary manslaughter in return for his testimony, and (2)
Jose was dating Christopher's sister at the time of the murder. What
argument will you make before the jury to create reasonable doubt?
Answer:
this is for the set up this is the first one I saw
What is the relationship between case law and common law
Answer:
They are practically the same thing and are used interchangably.
Explanation:
How many votes does it take to impeach a supreme court justice.
Select the best definition of civil liberties
The foundations of civil liberties: select the best answer from the choices provided.
A. Rights that are guaranteed by law.
B. Affirmative measures taken by the government to protect a group or class of citizens.
C. Rights that protect defendants during criminal proceedings.
D. Right of citizens involved in civil trails.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
liberty is something to protect
What comment is the cartoonist making about the
term of federal court judges?
what are the answer choices???
Explanation:
How many votes are needed to impeach a supreme court justice.
Answer:
a two thirds vote.
Explanation:
The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from holding public offices in the future.
Suppose that the president proposes a new law aimed at reducing healthcare costs. All americans are required to eat one apple daily
If the President should sign such a law in place the effect would be:
A. The value of the marginal product of apple pickers increases.B. The equilibrium price of apples increases.E. The marginal product of apple pickers increases.What would be the effect of the Presidents policy on the economy?By asking that the consumption of apples be increased, it would lead to a rise in the demand for apples in the country.
When this happens, it means that the revenue of apple growers would rise in the country due to increased demand.
Complete question:
Suppose that the president proposes a new law aimed at reducing healthcare costs: All Americans are required to eat one apple daily.
Which of the following statements correctly describes the effect of this apple-a-day law? Check all that apply.
A. The value of the marginal product of apple pickers increases.
B. The equilibrium price of apples increases.
C. The demand for apples remains unchanged.
D. The demand for apple pickers remains unchanged.
E. The marginal product of apple pickers increases.
F. The wage of apple pickers increases
Read more on demand here: https://brainly.com/question/1245771
How many judges did trump appoint to the supreme court.
Answer:
3
Explanation:
He appointed Neil Gorsuch in 2017, Brett Kavanaugh in 2018, and Amy Coney Barrett in 2020.
Brainliest please :)
What is an adjustment or change that can replace the negative effects of burning fossil fuels for energy?
Water irrigation
Solar Power
Digging for oil
Burning wood
Pelz help A. S. A. P. Really need help!
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Solar power can serve as a substitute for fossil fuels and can also counteract the effects of burning fossil fuels by using thermal energy.
In modern day terms, what determines the classification behind a white-collar crime?
A.
the profession of the victim
B.
the profession of the criminal
C.
the type of crime committed
D.
the area the crime was committed in
Answer:
"crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation."
Explanation:
Who made the clash royale theme song??
It was done by Barton F. Graf 9000, New York advertising agency
Which of the following is not one of the duties of a sheriff?
manage local jails
transport prisoners to and from the jail
serve warrants
give out citations for traffic violations
what is the concept ethics ?
What is the definition of ethics?
The term ethics can refer to any philosophical theory of what is morally right and wrong, morally good and evil, and any system or code of moral norms, principles, or values, as well as the philosophical study of moral right and wrong, moral good and bad. The three ethical theories (utilitarian ethics, deontological ethics, and virtue ethics) are at the heart of normative ethics debates. It is critical, however, for public relations professionals to grasp how to use these notions in their day-to-day work. Morality and ethics are both vaguely concerned with discriminating between "good and bad" or "right and wrong." Many individuals consider morality to be a personal and normative concept, whereas ethics refers to the "good and evil" norms established by a society or social situation.
- Robertonbrainly
Definition and list three separation power
Answer:
The system of separation of powers divides the tasks of the state into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. These tasks are assigned to different institutions in such a way that each of them can check the others.Explanation:
What are the 3 separation powers?
An agent will be relieved from liability to a third party for representations in excess of her authority if the (blank).
A. principal knows that the agent is acting in excess of her authority
B. third party knows that the agent is acting in excess of her authority
C. agent did not intend to mislead the third party
D. agent made the representations in good faith
An agent will be relieved from liability if third party knows that the agent is acting in excess of her authority.
Who is a agent?An agent acts on behalf of a client and at the client's direction in exchange for monetary compensation. An agent is a person who effects a contract between his principal and a third party.
With regards to the above, there exist a contract between an agent and his principal.
Hence, an agent will be relieved from liability if third party knows that the agent is acting in excess of her authority.
Learn more about agent here : https://brainly.com/question/23534924
______________________ law deals with crimes but ______________ law governs disputes between individuals
Answer:
Criminal law deals with crimes but civil law governs disputes between individuals.
Explanation:
Criminal law deals with crimes but Civil Law governs disputes between individuals.
What do you mean by Civil Law?
Civil law deals with disputes between individuals, organizations, and many more while Criminal Law is a legal entity that deals with crime and legal punishment for criminal offenses.
Civil law deals with disputes between individuals, organizations, or between the two, in which compensation is paid to the victim.
Thus, Criminal law deals with crimes but Civil Law governs disputes between individuals.
Learn more about Civil law:
https://brainly.com/question/493036
#SPJ4
a girl was raped by a man and she then went to the court and so they ave him 3 years to get imprisoned according to the law . so if you were the judge according to the law is the law fair, and if it was you what could you do
Answer:
It is not fair according if he did the same thing in the past I would fight for him to have mo time for what he did .
Explanation:
Hope this helps !!
Whats the difference between a federal judge and a supreme court justice
The federal judge perform legal duties at Federal district court while the supreme court justice perform legal duties at U.S. Supreme Court
Who are the Federal judges?
These are justices that serve in a federal court and can only be impeached by House of Representatives.
Who are the Supreme Court Justices?These Justices are part of the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court that were nominated by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.
Read more about Federal judges
brainly.com/question/1622017
What is original jurisdiction and which courts have it?
Answer:
Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers.
Explanation:
Case 3
A single hair was found on the back of a couch. The evidence collector placed it in a paper bindle. He then inserted the paper bindle into a plastic evidence bag. Using tape, the evidence collector sealed the bag. After completing the evidence log and the chain-of-custody form, he brought the evidence bag to the crime lab. What did he do incorrectly?
Answer: When you have hair as evidence, using plastic in any way can damage/tamper with it. He should have put the paper bindle in an envelope instead of the bag.
Explanation:
If a person use their hair as evidence, any use of plastic can tamper with or harm it. He ought to have used an envelope rather than a bag to store the paper bindle.
What is paper bindle?Binder paper is nothing more than a blank sheet of paper folded in a specified manner over a number of steps. Use of paper that is 8 x 12 inches in size is practical. It can also be transported to the crime or accident scene because of its portability.
In modern popular culture, a bindle is portrayed as an object-carrying pole with fabric or a blanket wrapped around one end. Over the shoulder, the complete collection is carried. When gripping larger, heavier objects, in particular, the force was moved to the shoulder, enabling a more stable grip.
For binders: paper Sometimes clean paper that has been folded into a container is included in the packaging for gathering trace evidence.
Thus, If a person use their hair as evidence, any use of plastic can tamper with or harm it.
For more details about paper bindle, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/5616377
#SPJ2
Explain, the principal of Res-judicata and limitation .
Answer: Overview. Generally, res judicata is the principle that a cause of action may not be relitigated once it has been judged on the merits. "Finality" is the term which refers to when a court renders a final judgment on the merits.
Explanation:
If someone sits on my car and causes damages what tort have they committed?
Answer:
ASSAULT
Personal injury law protects your right to control what does or does not touch your body. An assault is an act, or threat to act, that is intended to put a person in fear of imminent non-consensual physical touching. The tort of assault protects people from the fear that they will be physically harmed. Actual physical contact is not required, and in fact, if there is physical contact, the assault becomes a battery.
Note that this is different than what many people are familiar with in the context of criminal law, where assault and battery are terms that are defined by specific criminal legislation, which defines the criminal penalties imposed for engaging in certain acts, rather than the right to monetary recovery which is governed by personal injury law
to deny human rights is to challenge their very humanity discuss
should ignore it and if they do it again do the right to hit .
Explanation:
bc that's rude .