ndirect materials are part of: a. prime costs b. factory overhead costs c. traceable costs d. both (a) and (b) e. both (b) and (c)

For the first case, the Student Version is an example of paraphrasing plagiarism.

For the second case, the Student Version is an example of word-for-word plagiarism.

For the first case, the Student Version is an example of paraphrasing plagiarism. While the student did not directly copy the original source material word-for-word, they have still closely replicated the structure and content of the original text without proper citation or acknowledgement.

For the second case, the Student Version is an example of word-for-word plagiarism. The student has directly copied a sentence from the original source material without using quotation marks or providing proper citation or acknowledgement.

To know more about paraphrasing plagiarism visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30180097

#SPJ11

According to growth accounting studies, investing in research and education is often considered the best way to achieve greater technological progress.

This means that option (c) is the most accurate choice. Research and education play a crucial role in developing new knowledge, skills, and technologies, which can drive economic growth and productivity improvements.

By investing in research and education, individuals and organizations can acquire new insights, develop innovative solutions, and improve their overall capabilities. While on-the-job training and technology improvement are also important factors for growth, research and education are often recognized as fundamental drivers of long-term technological progress and economic development.

To Learn more about growth accounting, Click the links

brainly.com/question/27353529

brainly.com/question/11221053

#SPJ11

"b. An aging population." Governments around the world have experienced a significant increase in their outlays since the turn of the century, and one of the main drivers of this trend is the aging population.

As people get older, they require more social services and healthcare, which puts pressure on governments to increase their spending.

In many countries, the aging population is also putting pressure on government pension systems, as more people are living longer and drawing benefits for longer periods of time. This has led to the need for governments to reform their pension systems, which can be a politically difficult process.

Other factors that have contributed to the rise in government outlays include increased spending on national security and defense, higher education costs, and rising healthcare costs. However, the aging population is widely regarded as one of the most significant drivers of this trend.

Overall, governments are facing significant challenges in managing their finances in the face of rising demand for social services and the need to balance budgets. Policymakers will need to find creative solutions to these challenges if they hope to maintain the long-term stability of their economies.

Learn more about economies here:

https://brainly.com/question/17391901

#SPJ11

Beta is a measure of a security's sensitivity to market movements and is used to assess the risk associated with investing in that security. In this scenario, you've invested $700 in a security with a beta of 1.4 and $300 in another security with a beta of 0.8.

To calculate the beta of the resulting portfolio, you'll first need to determine the proportion of your investments in each security. For the first security, the proportion is $700/($700+$300) = 0.7. For the second security, the proportion is $300/($700+$300) = 0.3.

Next, multiply the proportion of each security by its respective beta: (0.7 x 1.4) + (0.3 x 0.8). This equals 0.98 + 0.24, which equals 1.22.

Therefore, the beta of your resulting portfolio is 1.22. This means your portfolio's expected return is 1.22 times more sensitive to market movements compared to a benchmark index, such as the S&P 500. A beta greater than 1 indicates a higher level of risk and potential reward, while a beta less than 1 suggests lower risk and reward.

To know more about Beta click this link -

brainly.com/question/22354424

#SPJ11

The given statement is false because the database management catalog is used by database administrators to manage the database schema, security, and other aspects of the database. It does not use histograms to understand the output from selection operations.

Histograms are used by the query optimizer to estimate the selectivity of predicates in the query and to choose an efficient execution plan. The optimizer uses histograms to understand the distribution of values in the columns that are involved in the query predicates.

This information helps the optimizer to estimate the number of rows that will be returned by the query and to choose the most efficient access method and join order. The database management catalog may contain information about the statistics and histograms for the tables and indexes in the database, but it does not use them directly to understand the output from selection operations.

Know more about database management click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31459706

#SPJ11

The value of the company's equity $2,000, and the share price is $2 in an M&M world

In an M&M world, the value of a company's equity can be calculated using the risk-free rate and expected cash flows. Given that there is a 50% probability of generating 300 per year and a 50% probability of generating 100 per year, the expected cash flow is (0.5 * 300) + (0.5 * 100) = 150 + 50 = 200 per year. As there is no systematic risk and the risk-free rate is 10%, the company's equity value can be determined using the perpetuity formula:

Equity Value = Expected Cash Flow / Risk-free Rate = 200 / 0.1 = 2,000

With 1,000 shares outstanding, the share price can be calculated as:

Share Price = Equity Value / Shares Outstanding = 2,000 / 1,000 = $2 per share

So, the value of the company's equity is $2,000, and the share price is $2 in an M&M world with no taxes and risk-free cash flows.

To know more about equity, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28767097#

#SPJ11

The net profit of the financial institution will be -$2,500,000. The correct answer is c.

In this case, the financial institution buys a $500 million cap at a premium of 0.75 percent of face value. This means that the financial institution pays $500 million + ($500 million x 0.0075) = $503.75 million for the cap. The cap sets a maximum interest rate of 7 percent. The financial institution also sells a $500 million floor at a premium of 0.70 percent of face value. This means that the financial institution receives $500 million + ($500 million x 0.007) = $503 million for the floor. The floor sets a minimum interest rate of 3 percent.

Now, if the interest rates rise to 7.25 percent, the financial institution will have to pay the difference between the cap and the current interest rate to the seller of the cap. This means that the financial institution will have to pay $500 million x (0.0075 + 0.0025) = $5 million to the seller of the cap. On the other hand, the financial institution will receive the difference between the floor and the current interest rate from the buyer of the floor.

This means that the financial institution will receive $500 million x (0.0075 - 0.0025) = $2.5 million from the buyer of the floor. Therefore, the net profit of the financial institution will be $2.5 million - $5 million = -$2.5 million or -$2,500,000. The correct answer is -$2,500,000.

For more such questions on net profit

https://brainly.com/question/28390615

#SPJ11

The legality of reverse engineering Coca-Cola's formula, producing an identical cola and selling it. In this scenario, what you have done is considered illegal.

The primary reason for the illegality is that you have violated Coca-Cola's trade secrets, which are protected by intellectual property laws. Trade secrets encompass confidential information, such as formulas and recipes, that give a company a competitive advantage in the market.

Reverse engineering the formula without authorization infringes on Coca-Cola's rights to exclusively benefit from their trade secret.

When you produce a cola identical to the reverse-engineered formula, you essentially replicate Coca-Cola's product without obtaining permission or a license from the company. This unauthorized replication directly impacts Coca-Cola's market share and profits, as it creates unfair competition.

Finally, selling the identical cola furthers the legal violation, as you are profiting from the misappropriation of Coca-Cola's trade secret. This act of selling may also lead to additional charges, such as unfair competition and deceptive trade practices, depending on the jurisdiction and applicable laws.

In summary, reverse engineering Coca-Cola's formula, producing an identical cola, and selling it is illegal because it infringes on Coca-Cola's trade secret rights, creates unfair competition, and involves profiting from misappropriated intellectual property.

To know more about reverse engineering refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31179848#

#SPJ11

Allison Aubrey provides an interpretation for the increase in fatal car crashes among 18-year-olds.

According to her, the decrease in the number of fatal car crashes among 16-year-olds is due to the improved restrictions and stricter laws put in place by states, while the increase in the number of fatal car crashes among 18-year-olds is because they aren't covered by the same laws.According to the text, "Fatal Car Crashes Drop for 16-year-Olds, Rise for Older Teens," by Allison Aubrey, there has been a significant decrease in fatal car crashes among 16-year-olds, but there has also been a significant increase in fatal car crashes among 18-year-olds.

Aubrey implies that the decrease in the number of fatal car crashes among 16-year-olds is due to the improved restrictions and stricter laws put in place by states to help reduce accidents and improve safety.However, the interpretation of this fact contradicts the quotation in lines 133-135 of "Is 16 too young to drive a car?" The author of "Is 16 too young to drive a car?" states that 16-year-olds are too young to drive cars and that raising the driving age to 18 or 21 will help reduce the number of fatal car crashes among teens.

Meanwhile, Aubrey implies that 18-year-olds are involved in more fatal car crashes because they aren't covered by the same laws as 16-year-olds. Hence, this interpretation of the increase in fatal car crashes among 18-year-olds conflicts with the quotation in lines 133-135 of "Is 16 too young to drive a car?"

To learn more about car :

https://brainly.com/question/31448756

#SPJ11

The relative frequency method assigns a probability of 0.2 to the outcome of making a donation to the city symphony.

The question presents us with the information that out of 250 people who were contacted, 50 of them made a donation to the city symphony. Using this information, we can apply the relative frequency method to assign a probability to the outcome of making a donation. The relative frequency method is based on the idea that the probability of an event is equal to the number of times it occurs divided by the total number of trials. In this case, the event is making a donation to the city symphony, and the total number of trials is the number of people who were contacted. Therefore, the probability of making a donation can be calculated as follows: Probability of making a donation = Number of people who made a donation / Total number of people contacted Probability of making a donation = 50 / 250 Probability of making a donation = 0.2 So, the relative frequency method assigns a probability of 0.2 to the outcome of making a donation to the city symphony. It is important to note that the relative frequency method is based on empirical observations and is only an estimate of the true probability. As such, it is subject to sampling variability and may not accurately represent the true probability in all situations. However, it is a useful tool for making predictions and making decisions based on available data.

For more such questions on frequency

https://brainly.com/question/16022500

#SPJ11

An increase in production in the short run can result in different effects on different costs. The answer to the question depends on which cost is being considered. Hence, the correct answer is option B. marginal costs.

If we look at the average total costs, then the answer would be "it depends." In the short run, the fixed costs are usually considered fixed and cannot be changed, so an increase in production can lead to spreading these fixed costs over a larger output, thus decreasing the average fixed costs. If we look at the marginal costs, then the answer would be "b) Marginal costs." Marginal costs represent the cost of producing one additional unit of output, and in the short run, an increase in production will almost always result in an increase in marginal costs.

If we look at the total costs, then the answer would be "c) Total costs." An increase in production will increase the total costs because the variable costs will increase as more output is produced. Lastly, if we look at the average fixed costs, then the answer would be "a decrease." In conclusion, an increase in production in the short run can result in an increase in marginal costs and total costs, a decrease in average fixed costs, and it depends on the effect on average total costs.

learn more about marginal costs here:

brainly.com/question/7781429

#SPJ11

Pearson Air Conditioning & Service demonstrates a stable financial structure and overall performance. However, it's essential to evaluate aspects like accounts receivable, inventory, bank borrowing, and accounts payable to better understand their position.

The strengths in managing accounts receivable and inventory include timely collections and efficient stock control. Weaknesses may involve delayed payments from customers and excessive inventory, leading to higher carrying costs. To improve, Pearson should adopt stricter credit policies and implement inventory optimization techniques.

Regarding bank borrowing, Pearson should analyze their debt-to-equity ratio and interest coverage to determine if expansion or reduction is appropriate. Maintaining a balanced debt level ensures financial stability and favorable credit ratings.

In managing accounts payable, Pearson should aim to negotiate better credit terms with suppliers, ensuring timely payments without straining cash flows. Prompt payments also help build strong relationships with suppliers.

To calculate Pearson's cash conversion period, combine the days sales outstanding, days inventory outstanding, and subtract days payable outstanding. Interpretation of this computation helps gauge the firm's effectiveness in managing its working capital cycle.

To improve its working-capital situation, Pearson should focus on enhancing accounts receivable collections, optimizing inventory levels, managing bank borrowing, and negotiating better credit terms with suppliers. Implementing these strategies will lead to a more efficient and financially stable business.

You can read more about working-capital at https://brainly.com/question/19804046

#SPJ11

The company uses the direct writeminus−off method for bad debts, the amount of bad debts​ expense: $17,000. The correct option is C.

To find the amount of bad debts expense, we first need to calculate the total credit sales made during 2017. We can do this by subtracting the cash sales ($41,000) from the net credit sales ($160,000), which gives us a total credit sales of $119,000 ($160,000 - $41,000).

Next, we need to determine the amount of accounts receivable that were written off as uncollectible during 2017. The question states that $17,000 of accounts were written off, which means that $17,000 of the accounts receivable balance at the end of the year (December 31, 2017) is no longer collectible.

Using the direct write-off method, bad debts expense is recognized when an account is written off as uncollectible. Therefore, the amount of bad debts expense for the year is equal to the amount of accounts written off, which is $17,000. Therefore, the correct answer is option C - $17,000.

To know more about bad debts​, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/18721587#

#SPJ11

To address this question, the first step is to create a new worksheet for each requirement and name them accordingly.

For each pivot table or chart, the dollar amounts should be formatted using the accounting format with zero decimal places. Non-currency numbers should also be formatted in the same way.

Once this is done, the budget variance report can be analyzed to identify any variances that need to be investigated. There are several factors that could contribute to variances in a budget, such as unexpected expenses, changes in market conditions, or errors in forecasting.

For example, if there is a significant variance in the sales revenue, this could indicate that the sales team may not be meeting their targets or that there is an issue with the product or service being offered. Similarly, if there is a variance in the cost of goods sold, this could be due to changes in the cost of raw materials or production processes.

In order to investigate these variances further, it may be necessary to gather more data, conduct a more detailed analysis, or speak to relevant stakeholders to get a better understanding of the situation.

By doing so, it may be possible to identify the root cause of the variance and take corrective action to address it. Overall, a thorough analysis of the budget variance report can help identify areas where improvements can be made to achieve better financial outcomes.

For more such questions on, worksheet :

https://brainly.com/question/308715

#SPJ11

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and Alderfer's ERG Theory are similar because both suggest that individuals are motivated by a specific set of needs (Option 1). However, they differ in their approach to the order in which these needs are met.

Maslow's theory suggests that individuals must satisfy lower-level needs before moving on to higher-level needs, while Alderfer's theory suggests that individuals may work on multiple needs simultaneously and that progress in one area may compensate for deficiencies in another area.

Neither theory suggests that punishment is more effective than rewards at motivating behavior (Option 2), and both suggest that individuals can be motivated by rewards from any level of need, not just those that have not yet been met (Option 3). So, options 2 and 3 are incorrect.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 1: Both theories suggest that individuals are motivated by a specific set of needs.

To know more about Maslow's Hierarchy click this link -

brainly.com/question/27964108

#SPJ11

Financial contagion is a phenomenon that occurs when a financial crisis in one country or region spreads to other countries or regions. This can happen in a variety of ways, such as through direct trade links, financial institutions, and investor sentiment.

During the recent debt crisis, financial contagion occurred as certain countries in the Eurozone, such as Greece and Spain, experienced difficulty in repaying their debt. This caused investors to become more wary of investing in Eurozone countries and their currencies, leading to a drop in value and an increase in borrowing costs.

Similarly, during Brexit, investors became concerned about the potential economic implications of Brexit, leading to a sharp selloff in the British pound, which spread to other markets. This caused a contagion of financial uncertainty, which had a number of effects, including increased borrowing costs and a decrease in stock markets around the world.

know more about investor sentiment here

https://brainly.com/question/31858978#

#SPJ11

This statement "Total output may continue to rise even though marginal physical product is negative" is True.

Total output may continue to rise even though marginal physical product (MPP) is negative. Marginal physical product refers to the change in total output when an additional unit of input (such as labor or capital) is employed. When MPP is positive, it indicates that adding an extra unit of input will result in an increase in total output. However, as more input units are added, the MPP may eventually become negative due to the law of diminishing returns.

The law of diminishing returns states that as more units of input are employed, there will be a point at which the incremental output gained from each additional unit starts to decline. Once MPP becomes negative, it implies that adding more units of input actually decreases the total output. However, total output can continue to rise if the negative MPP is relatively small compared to the total output generated thus far.

For example, imagine a factory that initially increases its total output with each new worker added. Eventually, adding more workers causes overcrowding and inefficiencies, leading to a negative MPP. Yet, if the decrease in output caused by the negative MPP is smaller than the increase in output from the previous workers, the total output will still continue to rise, albeit at a slower pace.

To know more about product click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31859289

#SPJ11

The correct answer for your question is: D. Both B and C. Gain realized on a like-kind exchange is excluded from income in most circumstances.

However, there are exceptions where gains are not excluded from income. This means that gain realized on a like-kind exchange is NOT excluded from income when: B. Boot is received: If a taxpayer receives "boot," which is any additional property or cash received in the exchange that is not considered like-kind, the gain must be recognized as income to the extent of the boot received. C. When a liability is assumed: If a taxpayer assumes a liability in the exchange, such as taking on a mortgage or loan, the gain may be recognized as income to the extent of the difference between the liability assumed and the liability given up.

Learn more about income from here:

https://brainly.com/question/15034046

#SPJ11

To calculate the company's weighted average cost of capital (WACC), we need to use the following formula:

WACC = (E/V x Re) + (D/V x Rd x (1 - T))

where:

E = market value of the company's equity

D = market value of the company's debt

V = E + D

Re = cost of equity

Rd = pretax cost of debt

T = tax rate

First, we need to calculate the market value of the company's equity and debt:

Assuming the total value of the company is $1,000, we can calculate the market value of equity and debt as:

Market value of equity = $1,000 x (1 - 0.40) = $600

Market value of debt = $1,000 x 0.40 = $400

Next, we can plug in the given values into the WACC formula:

WACC = ($600/$1,000 x 0.135) + ($400/$1,000 x 0.055 x (1 - 0.21))

WACC = (0.6 x 0.135) + (0.4 x 0.04355)

WACC = 0.081 + 0.01742

WACC = 0.09842 or 9.84%

Therefore, the company's WACC is approximately 9.84%, which is closest to option A, 9.97%.

Know more about average cost here https://brainly.com/question/20743510#

#SPJ11

A low GDP is not necessarily an indicator of an economy in poor health. For one thing, a small country may have a low GDP but a high standard of living. For another thing, an economy with a low GDP but a strong real GDP growth rate is healthier than an economy with a comparable GDP that is stagnant or declining.

This means that even though the total value of goods and services produced is relatively low, the quality of life for its citizens is high. The real GDP growth rate takes inflation into account, providing a more accurate representation of the economy's health. A positive real GDP growth rate indicates that the economy is expanding, whereas a stagnant or declining GDP may suggest economic struggles.

In conclusion, it's important to consider factors like the size of the country, the standard of living, and the real GDP growth rate when evaluating an economy's health. A low GDP alone does not necessarily imply a poorly performing economy.

For more about growth rate:

https://brainly.com/question/12490064

#SPJ11

The receivables turnover for Rose, Inc. is 2742.857.

The annual credit sales for Rose, Inc. are $263,142,857.14.

a. To calculate the receivables turnover, we need to divide the average daily investment in receivables by the number of days in the average collection period. So:
Receivables turnover = Average daily investment in receivables / Average collection period
= $96,000 / 35
= 2742.857
Therefore, the receivables turnover for Rose, Inc. is 2742.857.
b. To find the annual credit sales, we can multiply the receivables turnover by the average investment in receivables. So:

Annual credit sales = Receivables turnover x Average investment in receivables
= 2742.857 x $96,000
= $263,142,857.14
Therefore, the annual credit sales for Rose, Inc. are $263,142,857.14.
Overall, Rose, Inc. has a high receivables turnover, which indicates that it collects its accounts receivable quickly. However, it is important to note that the receivables turnover should be analyzed in conjunction with other financial ratios to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the company's financial health.

for more such questions on   sales

https://brainly.com/question/25743891

#SPJ11

The journal entries for merchandising transactions of Walker's are recorded using the perpetual inventory system and gross method. A partial income statement is prepared to calculate the gross profit which is $6,128.

Journal Entries

Jul. 1: Accounts Payable-Thompson $7,200

Merchandise Inventory $7,200

Jul. 2: Accounts Receivable-Mitchell Co. $1,588

Sales Revenue $1,588

Cost of Goods Sold $960 (calculated as $9,000 x 10.67%)

Jul. 3: Freight-In $360

Cash $360

Jul. 8: Cash $3,209

Sales Revenue $3,209

Cost of Goods Sold $1,709

Jul. 9: Merchandise Inventory $2,800

Accounts Payable-Mannion Co. $2,800

Jul. 11: Accounts Payable-Mannion Co. $60

Cash $60

Jul. 12: Cash $1,558.64 (calculated as $1,588 - ($1,588 x 2%))

Sales Discounts $29.36 (calculated as $1,588 x 2%)

Accounts Receivable-Mitchell Co. $1,588

Jul. 16: Accounts Payable-Thompson Co. $7,056 (calculated as $7,200 - ($7,200 x 1%))

Purchase Discounts $144 (calculated as $7,200 x 1%)

Cash $6,912

Jul. 19: Accounts Receivable-Sanchez Co. $2,400

Sales Revenue $2,400

Cost of Goods Sold $1,700

Jul. 21: Sales Returns and Allowances $500 (credit memo amount)

Accounts Receivable-Sanchez Co. $500 (credit memo amount)

Jul. 24: Accounts Payable-Mannion Co. $2,744 (calculated as $2,800 - ($2,800 x 2%))

Purchase Discounts $56 (calculated as $2,800 x 2%)

Cash $2,688

Jul. 30: Cash $2,367.20 (calculated as $2,400 - ($2,400 x 2%))

Sales Discounts $32.80 (calculated as $2,400 x 2%)

Accounts Receivable-Mitchell Co. $2,400

To calculate the impact on the income statement, we need to first prepare a schedule of income statement accounts

Sales Revenue:

July 2: $1,588

July 8: $3,209

July 19: $2,400

July 31: $8,200

Total Sales Revenue: $15,397

Cost of Goods Sold

July 2: $960

July 8: $1,709

July 19: $1,700

July 31: $4,900

Total Cost of Goods Sold: $9,269

Gross Profit: $6,128

To calculate the impact on the trial balance, we need to adjust the accounts affected by the journal entries above. The final trial balance should reflect the following balances

Accounts Receivable: $4,228 ($1,588 + $2,400 + $240 - $500)

Accounts Payable: $7,464 ($7,200 - $144 + $2,744 - $60)

Merchandise Inventory: $7,551 ($7,200 + $2,800 - $1,700)

Sales Revenue: $15,397

Sales Discounts: $62.16 ($29.36 + $32.80)

Sales Returns and Allowances: $500

Purchase Discounts: $200 ($144 + $56)

Cost of Goods Sold: $9

To know more about journal entries:

https://brainly.com/question/20421012

#SPJ4

The break-even point can be expressed as sales in dollars or units.

The break-even point is the point at which a business neither makes a profit nor incurs a loss. It is the point where the total revenue earned is equal to the total costs incurred. The break-even point can be calculated by dividing the total fixed costs by the contribution margin per unit. The contribution margin is the amount by which the selling price exceeds the variable cost per unit. Once the break-even point is calculated, it can be expressed as a dollar amount or a unit amount, depending on the needs of the business.

Learn more about the break-even point here:

https://brainly.com/question/22871926

#SPJ11

The answer to this multiple-choice question cannot be determined with certainty based on the information provided. Option E none of these

To determine the number of nations and corporations with a Gross National Income (GNI) greater than the total annual sales of Walmart Stores in 2016, we need to find the GNI of Walmart Stores for that year.

According to Walmart's 2016 annual report, the company had total revenue of $485.9 billion. However, revenue is not the same as GNI, which is the total income earned by a country's residents and businesses.

To estimate Walmart's GNI for 2016, we can look at the company's net income, which is the amount of profit it earned after subtracting expenses. According to Walmart's 2016 annual report, its net income for that year was $13.6 billion.

However, this only represents the income earned by Walmart as a corporation, and not the income earned by its employees and other businesses that rely on Walmart's operations.

Based on this information, it is likely that many nations had a GNI greater than Walmart's estimated GNI for 2016, and it is possible that some corporations also had higher total sales. However, without more specific data, it is difficult to determine exactly how many nations and corporations fit these criteria. Option E none of these.

For more such questions on information visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24553900

#SPJ11

The correct answer is c) (50,0).

To solve this linear programming problem, we need to graph the feasible region defined by the constraints and then find the corner point with the lowest objective function value.

The optimum solution is (50,0), and the minimum value of the objective function is 1000. Option c is correct answer.

To solve this linear programming problem, we need to graph the constraints and find the feasible region, which is the set of all (X,Y) pairs that satisfy all the constraints. Then, we need to evaluate the objective function (20X + 30Y) at the vertices of the feasible region to find the optimum solution.

The first constraint, 2X + 4Y ≤ 800, can be rewritten as Y ≤ -0.5X + 200 and plotted as a line with a slope of -0.5 and a y-intercept of 200. The second constraint, 6X + 3Y ≥ 300, can be rewritten as Y ≥ -2X + 100 and plotted as a line with a slope of -2 and a y-intercept of 100.

When we graph these two lines, we find that the feasible region is a triangle with vertices at (0,0), (50,0), and (100,50).

Next, we evaluate the objective function (20X + 30Y) at the vertices of the feasible region:

(0,0): 20(0) + 30(0) = 0

(50,0): 20(50) + 30(0) = 1000

(100,50): 20(100) + 30(50) = 3500

Option c is correct answer.

To know more about optimum solution, here

https://brainly.com/question/31595653

#SPJ4

A firm should operate in the short run when losing money if its marginal revenue is above average variable cost: as it enables the firm to cover variable costs and some fixed costs, thus minimizing losses.

In the short run, a firm should continue to operate even if it is losing money, as long as the marginal revenue exceeds the average variable cost. This situation allows the firm to cover all of its variable costs and contribute towards some of its fixed costs with the remaining revenue. By doing so, the firm minimizes its losses in the short run, as opposed to shutting down and bearing the full burden of its fixed costs.

If a company cannot cover all of its variable costs, it is losing more money by continuing to operate than by temporarily shutting down in the short run. In this case, the firm's marginal revenue is not enough to cover the average variable cost, making it economically unviable to continue operations. The firm should reevaluate its cost structure, pricing strategy, and market conditions to determine if it can become profitable in the long run.

In summary, a firm should operate in the short run when losing money if its marginal revenue is above average variable cost, as it enables the firm to cover variable costs and some fixed costs, thus minimizing losses. If it cannot cover all variable costs, it is more advantageous to shut down in the short run and reassess the firm's position in the market.

To know more about marginal revenue, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30235855#

#SPJ11

Cash receipts from customers: $235,000

Cash payments for operating expenses: $170,000

To compute cash receipts from customers, we need to adjust the revenue figure by the decrease in accounts receivable. This means that the company received $40,000 less from customers during the year than it had anticipated.

Cash receipts from customers = Revenues - Decrease in accounts receivable

Cash receipts from customers = $275,000 - $40,000

Cash receipts from customers = $235,000

To compute cash payments for operating expenses, we need to adjust the operating expenses figure by the increase in accounts payable. This means that the company paid $35,000 more for operating expenses during the year than it had anticipated.

Cash payments for operating expenses = Operating expenses + Increase in accounts payable

Cash payments for operating expenses = $135,000 + $35,000

Cash payments for operating expenses = $170,000

Therefore, the company received $235,000 in cash from customers and paid $170,000 in cash for operating expenses during the year.

Learn more about operating expenses: https://brainly.com/question/14995350

#SPJ11

Based on the given scenario, we can conclude that the demand for the firm's product is elastic. Elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in price.

When the price of a product increases and the revenue collected from the sales of that product falls, it means that the increase in price has caused a decrease in the quantity demanded that is greater than the percentage increase in price.In other words, the demand for the product is sensitive to changes in price. This could occur when there are substitute products that are readily available or when the product is considered a luxury rather than a necessity. In such cases, consumers are likely to reduce their purchases of the product as the price increases, and this leads to a reduction in revenue for the firm.Therefore, the firm needs to carefully consider the price elasticity of demand for its product and set its prices accordingly to maximize its revenue. If the demand for the product is elastic, the firm may need to reduce its prices to increase the quantity demanded and overall revenue.

Learn more about Elasticity here

https://brainly.com/question/1048608

#SPJ11

The given statement the unemployment problem becomes more severe if prices are sticky downward is true.

The unemployment problem can become more severe if prices are sticky downward. This is because in a situation where prices are sticky, it becomes more difficult for firms to adjust wages and prices downward to respond to changes in the economy.

When the economy experiences a downturn, demand for goods and services decreases, leading to a reduction in sales and revenue for firms. In a situation where prices are sticky, firms are unable to reduce prices to match the decrease in demand, which can lead to excess inventory and a reduction in production.

To adjust to the lower demand, firms may need to reduce their costs, including wages and salaries. However, in a situation where wages are sticky, firms may be reluctant to reduce wages as it can lead to lower morale among workers and difficulties in retaining skilled employees. This can result in firms reducing their workforce instead, leading to higher levels of unemployment.

Therefore, when prices are sticky downward, it can exacerbate the unemployment problem by making it more difficult for firms to adjust to changes in the economy and reducing their ability to respond to lower demand.

know more about unemployment click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31115808

#SPJ11

The trial court judge should consider the admissibility of the evidence presented by Anderson's attorney in accordance with the rules of evidence and relevant case law.

First, the testimony of Henry Anderson regarding the alleged statement made by Wabash's general manager, Fred Stein, is hearsay evidence. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. In general, hearsay is inadmissible in court unless it falls within an exception to the hearsay rule. Anderson's attorney may argue that the statement falls within the exception for admissions of a party opponent, but the judge will need to determine if the statement was made by Stein, if it was against his interest, and if it was made in connection with the contract between Wabash and Anderson. The judge may also consider whether the statement was ambiguous or whether it contradicts the express terms of the written contract. Ultimately, the judge will need to weigh the probative value of the evidence against the risk of unfair prejudice or confusion to the jury.

In sum, the trial court judge should consider the admissibility of the evidence offered by Anderson's attorney in light of the rules of evidence and relevant case law, and should make a determination based on the probative value of the evidence and the risk of unfair prejudice or confusion to the jury.

To know more about Anderson's  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/298936

#SPJ11