pls helppppppppppp it’s timedddd

Answer:

Option B, The distribution of apple candy can be modeled as normal if Susan picks candies over 75 times

Step-by-step explanation:

The distribution of apple candies can be represented as normal curve and hence the sample proportion for this is true and can be drawn.

The rest other cases do not represent a normal distribution and hence it will not be easy to plot curve for these samples.

hence, option B is correct

Answer:

First equation has extra 6s and this extra 6s=54-42=12

6s=12. s=2

Step-by-step explanation:

6*2+10t=42 ........ 10t=30 t=3

Answer:

s = 2 and t = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming you were suppose to type s instead of a,

12s + 10t = 54 -- (1)

6s + 10t = 42 -- (2)

(1) - (2) : 6s = 12

               s = 2 -- (3)

Substituting (3) into (2),

12 + 10t = 42

10t = 30

t = 3 -- (4)

Therefore, s = 2 and t = 3

If this helps you, please mark brainliest!

Have a nice day!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A y = -3.6x + 12.8

The line of best fit is,

⇒ y = - 3.6x + 12.8

Mathematical expression is defined as the collection of the numbers variables and functions by using operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Now, Given that;

⇒ y = ax + b.

And, the best fitting line has values of a = - 3.6 and b = 12.8.

Hence, All you need do is put that into the general equation and try different values for it.

So you have y = - 3.6 x + 12.8

Now Let's run a couple of numbers.

The table shows 1 and 9 for the first entry. This means when x = 1, y should come pretty close to nine.

y = - 3.6(1) + 12.8

y = 9.2

Which is not a bad result for x = 1

You might want to check to see if anything else comes closer in your choices. If it does, then you have to try other points.

C

-0.998 = -3.6(1) + 12.8

This answer cannot work. We've already shown that x =1 will leave us close to 9  not -998

So, C is incorrect.

B

y = 12.8x - 3.6

Let x = 1

y = 12.8(1) - 3.6

y = 9.2 is right by coincidence. We must try another value. The hardest one is going to be 5 and - 5

y= 12.8*5 - 3.6

y = 64 - 3.6 which is no where's near - 5.

So B is wrong.

A

y = -0.998(1) + 12.8 Does this give 9 or anywhere near it? 11.802 You might argue that that is not a bad result. So let's try another pair.

x = 3. y should come to somewhere near 2.

y = -0.998 * 3 + 12.8 which comes to roughly nine. You can check this out.

It is not close enough to 2 to be acceptable.

Thus, The correct option is,

⇒ y = - 3.6x + 12.8

Learn more about the mathematical expression visit:

brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ7

Answer:

Slope = 3

intercept = 2

y = 3x + 2

angle y = 70

angle x = 110

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the scale factor is

-2 and

-4

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \frac{135}{100} \times \frac{280}{1} = 378[/tex]

Answer:

exclude any real numbers that result in a negative number in the said radical. set your radical greater than or equal to zero and solve for x.

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

because the diagram the length decimal place degree

Answer:

(f+g)(x) = x - 7

Step-by-step explanation:

it is simple - when adding 2 functions your simply add both expressions. and the result is then the function of the sum.

the same applies also to other arithmetic operations.

-3x -5 + 4x - 2 = x - 7

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

2 is the answer because the circle touches the line only 2 times.

Hope this helps.

Answer:

D. 10, 8, 6, 4, 2, ...

Step-by-step explanation:

f(n + 1) = f(n) - 2

This means that each term is the previous term subtracted by 2,

f(1) = 10

This means that the first term of the sequence is 10.

Thus, the sequence is:

10, 8, 6, 4, 2, ...

Thus the correct answer is given by option D.

[tex]\implies {\blue {\boxed {\boxed {\purple {\sf { (5x + 6y)(5x - 6y) }}}}}}[/tex]

[tex]\large\mathfrak{{\pmb{\underline{\orange{Step-by-step\:explanation}}{\orange{:}}}}}[/tex]

[tex] ={25x}^{2} - 36 {y}^{2} [/tex]

[tex] = ({5 \times 5)x}^{2} - (6 \times 6){y}^{2} [/tex]

[tex] = ({5x})^{2} -( {6y})^{2} [/tex]

[tex] = (5x + 6y)(5x - 6y)[/tex]

[tex] {a}^{2} - {b}^{2} = (a + b)(a - b)[/tex]

[tex]\red{\large\qquad \qquad \underline{ \pmb{{ \mathbb{ \maltese \: \: Mystique35♛}}}}}[/tex]

false

Step-by-step explanation:

ita really false yoooooooooooooo

Answer:

77,786.251

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

10 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

10 miles= 16093.44km

44880ft=13.679424km

15560yards= 14.228064

I don't know what your looking for, so be more specific, but I'm assuming your solving for x, so that's would be

x = -1

Answer:

We can simply solve all of these by simplifying them :)

1 . 13 - 4x = 1 - x =

x = 4

2 .  7a - 3 = 3 + 6a =

a = 6

3 . 5 + 2x = -2x + 6 =

x = 1/4

4 . -11 + x = 7x - 5 =

x = -1

Answer:

osjdiajsjoasnndosnsnd

Answer:

x+120°+20°=180°[ sum of interior angle of triangle]

x+140°=180°

x=40°

then,

x+y= 180°[being straight line]

40°+y= 180°

y=140°

Step-by-step explanation:

10075 .+#!!#+#!$!$++$7$+"$($(

Answer:yes it is

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The equation of the line is, "y = 5/3x."

Step-by-step explanation:

Here are the pictures of the graph and points attached:

Answer:

a) z(s)  is in the rejection region for H₀  we reject H₀.

We have enough support to conclude that the two populations are different  

z(s) is in the rejection region so we reject H₀

The two population have a different proportion of non-contaminated food

Step-by-step explanation:

Conditions:

-Independent samples

-Random samples

- Size samples big enough

a) A Brand Chickens Sample:

sample size   n₁  = 80

We will go through a z- test

number of contamination cases  x₁  =  31

Then   p₁  =  31/80     p₁  =  0.3875    and  q₁  =  1 - p₁  ; q₁ = 1 - 0.3875

q₁  =  0.6125

B Brand Chickens Sample:

sample size   n₂  =  80

number of contamination cases  x₂  =  61

Then  p₂ = 61/80   p₂ = 0.7625  and  q₂ =  1  -  p₂ ;   q₂  =  1  -  0.7625

q₂  =  0.2375

Hypothesis Test:

Null Hypothesis                                  H₀     p₂ =  p₁

Alternative Hypothesis                      Hₐ     p₂ ≠ p₁

The alternative hypothesis call for a two-tail test ( ≠ ) we will test if the proportion differs )

A significance level  α =  0.01   then    α/2 = 0.005

From z -Table     α/2  =  0.005  correspond to z(c) =  2.575

To calculate z(s)

z(s)  =   ( p₂  -  p₁ ) / √( p₁*q₁/n₁) + (p₂*q₂)/n₂)

z(s)  = (  0.7625  -  0.3875 ) / √(0,3875*0.6125)/80 + (0.7625*0.2375)/80

z(s)  = ( 0.375 ) / √(0.00296) + (0.00226)

z(s)  = ( 0.375 ) /0.072

z(s)  =  5.21

Comparing    z(s)   and   z(c)    z(s) > z(c)

z(s)  is in the rejection region for H₀  we reject H₀.

We have enough support to conclude that the two populations are different

b) folowing the same procedure now talking about non-contaminated chickens

Tyson  Brand Chickens  p₁ =  0,5   then  q₁ = 0.5

Perdue Brand chickens  p₂ = 0.25 then  q₂ = 0.75

n₁ = n₂ = 80

Hypothesis Test:

Null Hypothesis                        H₀            p₁  = p₂

Alternative Hypothesis            Hₐ            p₁ ≠ p₂

Alternative hypothesis indicates a two-tail test

z(c)  =  2.575

And z(s)  =  (0.5 - 0.25)/ √(0.5*0.5)/80  + (0.25*0.75)/80

z(s) = 0.25 / √( 0.003125 + 0.002343

z(s) = 0.25 / 0.0739

z(s) = 3.38

Comparing z(s)  and z(c)

z(s) >  z(c)  

z(s) is in the rejection region so we reject H₀

The two population have different proportion of non-contaminated food

Step-by-step explanation:

3 29/31 + 9 13/14 * 26 6/7 =0

first 26 6/7 = 26 13/14

3 29/31 +( 26 13/14 * 9 13/14)

3 29/31 + 266 32/49

Answer :

270 894/1519 / 270.5585 / 411024/1519

Answer:

D. [tex]4^{15}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]=(4^3)^5[/tex]

Multiply the exponent inside the parenthesis with the exponent outside.

[tex]=4^{15}[/tex]

Hope this helps.

Answer:

4^15

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok, so lets replace the base, 4, with x so we don’t get confused by it:

(X^3)^5

When we raise a power to a power, we multiply them , so:

(X^15)

Remember x is 4, so:

4^15 is the answer

Answer: hello your question is poorly written attached below is the complete question

answer:

i) Degrees of freedom : 2, 46 , 44

ii) Mean square : 650 , 13.4

iii) F = 47.65

Step-by-step explanation:

First treatment = 12 experimental units

Second treatment = 15 experimental units

Third treatment = 20 experimental units

completing  the analysis

i) Degree of freedom

for Treatments = 3 - 1 = 2

for Total = ( 12 + 15 + 20 ) - 1 = 47 - 1 = 46

for error = 46 -2 = 44

ii) Mean square

  for treatments = sum of squares / degree of freedom = 1300/2 = 650

  for error = 600 / 44 = 13.64

iii) F

= Ms of treatment / Ms of error

= 650 / 13.64 = 47.65

Answer:

11

Step-by-step explanation:

(a+b)^2=a^2+b^2+2ab

a^2+b^2=(a+b)^2-2ab

=5^2-14

=11

Answer:

LHS×0=RHS×0

0=0

hence,proved

Answer:

Marina had 50$ originally

Step-by-step explanation:

80-1/5 of the money she spent for the books that she brought, The step by step process is how much money she had left behind from the books she brought seperate

Answer:

$100

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1, setting up an equation:

If Marina spent [tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex] of her money, she has [tex]\frac{4}{5}[/tex] of her money remaining. We also are given that she has $80 left. We can set her initial total amount of money as x to solve this problem:

[tex]\frac{4}{5}x=80[/tex]

Step 2, solving for x:

[tex]\frac{4}{5}x=80\\\\4x=400\\\\x=100[/tex]

We have set x as her original amount of money, so we have the answer!

Marina originally had  [tex]\fbox{100}[/tex] dollars.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions :)

Answer:

ok

Step-by-step explanation:

why did you put it