Pls someone do this ASAP. I got the text and . Ill give Brainliest!!!!!!

Question 1
Part A
How should the sentence "I'm highly honored! be interpreted by the reader?
"oh, indeed! I'm highly honored!" (paragraph 27)

A. It should be read as an ironic statement because Richard Kennedy is not being sincere.
B. It should be taken literally because Richard Kennedy is touched by the doctor's reassurance
C. It should be seen a humorous because Richard Kennedy is trying to make the doctor laugh.
D. It should be regarded as an exaggeration because Richard Kennedy is only slightly honored

Part B
Select the detail from the passage that supports the answer in Part A
A. "holding out the copy of the Daily Telegraph"
B. "the gallant scot gave way to a genuine explosion of wrath
C. "the Scotchman gave a leap that a wild goat would not have been ashamed of"
D. "stood speechless with amazement"

2. What is the meaning of the word conceive as it is used in this sentence from the passage?
"to prevent the greatest piece of folly that ever was conceived." (paragraph 17)
A. To understand clearly
B. to develop an idea
C. to have an opinion
D. to begin or originate

3. How does the author develop a central idea of the passage in paragraphs 1 through 5?
A. By explaining the differenced between Kennedy and Ferguson, the author develops the idea that they were once much more alike
B. By describing the early friendship between Kennedy and Ferguson, the author develops the idea that they were once much more alike
C. By comparing and contrasting Kennedy and Ferguson, the author develops the ideas that Kennedy worries about Ferguson being in danger.
D. By telling the history of Kennedy and Ferguson, the author develops the idea that they have grown tired of each other.

4. A bark is a small ship. what does the author mean to tie up his bark for life?
"So, Kennedy besought the doctor to tie up his bark for life, having done enough for science, and to much for the gratitude of men." (paragraph 6)
A. To pun an end to his explorations.
B. to stop traveling by boat
C. to halt his experiments on transportation
D. To tie his boat more securely to the dock.

Answer:

C. So you can fully understand their point of view

Explanation:

When a conflict arises, its important to fully understand someone's views in order to understand why they respond the way they do. Think of it in this example: imagine a dog that has been abused for most of its life. When someone goes to pet that dog, the dog may be quick to bite or growl at the person. This isn't because it's necessarily a bad dog, but rather because the dog assumed it was going to be harmed because that's what it has experienced in life. People are the same way. To fully understand someone's choices, we have to understand what has happened to that person, or their views, in order for them to make the choices that they do.

Answer:

my opinion is that I would learn every single language first starting with Spanish.

Answer:

Learning Another Language might be hard, but many Experts Agree it is Worth the Work.

Explanation:

I got it !Correct! in I-Ready :D

Read the excerpt from "The Gift of the Magi."

Where she stopped the sign read: "Mme. Sofronie. Hair Goods of All Kinds." One flight up Della ran, and collected herself, panting. Madame, large, too white, chilly, hardly looked the "Sofronie."

"Will you buy my hair?" asked Della.

"I buy hair," said Madame. "Take yer hat off and let's have a sight at the looks of it."

Down rippled the brown cascade.

"Twenty dollars," said Madame, lifting the mass with a practised hand.

Madame Sofronie's character is most developed through

direct characterization, using her words and feelings.

indirect characterization, using her thoughts and action.

direct characterization, describing her physical appearance.

indirect characterization, describing her personality.

Answer:

direct characterization, describing her physical appearance.

Explanation:

According to the excerpt from "The Gift of the Magi", Madame Sofronie is described as owning a shop and the story is narrated that she is an experienced dealer and it is seen when she meets a prospective client.

Her character is most developed through direct characterization, describing her physical appearance.

Answer:

(C.) direct characterization, describing her physical appearance.

Explanation:

;)

The tiger was seen in the wood by people.

Answer:

the tiger was seen by the people

Answer:

I'd like a future where I can live comfortably and work hard to achieve my goal.

Explanation:

:)

Answer:

Often referred to as the parade ring, the horse paddock is where the runners in the forthcoming race are paraded for racegoers to get a proper look at them. The parade also gets the horses moving and relaxed.

Explanation:

Please follow me and give brainlist

Answer:

Run

Explanation:

have a good day!

Answer and Explanation:

Happyness....

Answer:

Denotation means : ''the literal or primary meaning of a word, in contrast to the feelings or ideas that the word suggests.''

So, the correct answer would be C. Missing.

Answer:C

Explanation:

USA TEST PREP

Answer:

feels is the linking verb

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Proof pertinent to the creator's contention as supporting proof aides back up the creators contention, it doesn't go against it, sideways notice it, or include insignificant data.

Recorded as a hard copy and discourses, supporting proof is data including measurements, models, quotes, and so on that helps the creator of a text or the speaker in a discourse to make sense of and demonstrate his situation or contention.

Along these lines, viable proof should be straightforwardly connected with the primary contention of the creator and necessities to help it as opposed to being incongruous.

Additionally, proof requirements to v¿be significant which implies it actually demonstrates the contention is legitimate. Taking into account this, the explanation that characterizes powerful supporting proof is proof applicable to the creator's contention.

For more information about arguments, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/27534345

#SPJ2

Answer:

1st answer: National service

2nd answer: Finished high school

3rd answer: Communities

Explanation:

Answer:

The sworn book was presented before Mr. Brownlow before he spoke.

Explanation:

"Oliver Twist" is the second novel of British writer, Charles Dickens. The story is about an orphan named Oliver Twist.

In chapter 11, Mr. Brownlow appears before the judge to appear against the boy, and confess that he was mistaken in identifying the boy as a thief. But before he spoke, he was asked to sworn by the magistrate.

Therefore, a sworn book was presented before Mr. Brownlow before he spoke.

Answer:b

Explanation:

B

The best description of the author’s word choice and the way in which it supports the argument is the author uses figurative language to simplify complex ideas. Thus option (b) is correct.

An author is a person who writes books, articles, or any other type of written work that is published or intended to be published. Authors may work in a variety of genres, such as fiction, non-fiction, poetry, drama, or journalism.

They may write for various purposes, such as to entertain, inform, educate, persuade, or inspire their readers. Being an author typically involves a significant amount of research, planning, writing, editing, and revising.

The author uses figurative language to simplify complex ideas is the best description of the author’s word choice and the way in which it supports the argument. Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about author here:

brainly.com/question/28623865

#SPJ2

Answer:

rasin bread and white bread

Explanation:

Answer:

In it, he invoked the principles of human equality contained in the Declaration of Independence and connected the sacrifices of the Civil War with the desire for “a new birth of freedom,” as well as the all-important preservation of the Union created in 1776 and its ideal of self-government.

Answer:

When I grow up, I want to be a photographer, and that makes my mom really proud.

Explanation:

There is a comma making it a complex sentence and a conjunction making it compound as well so it's a compound-complex sentence

and two independent clauses and one dependent clause make a compound-complex sentence.

Answer:

.D

Explanation:

Answer:

no

Explanation:

Answer:Some National Football League players appear to be turning over a new leaf when it comes to gay rights, but a history of homophobia still haunts the sport.

Explanation:

Answer:

my mom

Explanation:

i look up to her because shes sweet ,shes nice,she has nice friends. Also she has nice hand writing.Also she is 6.2 feet tall!

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

When you exhale, your diaphragm contracts. When you inhale, your diaphragm expands

Explanation:

Answer:

The five types of business structures are sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, corporation and cooperative. Choosing the right structure depends largely on your business type. As your business grows, you'll be able to switch structures to meet its needs.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed unclothed

Answer:

robert- paul's white half-brother who is the same age as paul

mitchell- an african american boy who lives on paul's father's land

cassie- paul's sibling, another of edward logan's children

edward logan- paul's father, a white landowner  

Explanation:

got it right on edge :)

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

Neither Farahany nor Silver argued in favor of allowing parents to modify their children to ensure other traits that are less medically necessary, but nevertheless desirable, such as higher intelligence or blue eyes. "What I think parents care about most is promoting the health of their children," Silver said. Leading to eugenics?

No, humans should not be allowed to genetically modify babies. There are so many down sides and problems with the process. There are many safety concerns, it isn’t very efficient and it would cause a negative impact on society. First, genetically modifying babies is a huge safety risk.

What do you think of when you hear the word ‘Genetically Modified’? Soybeans? Corn? No. This time, human beings. The human genome editing technology has progressed at a surprising pace in these three decades from the Human Genome Project to CRISPR. There was an announcement last week that the two scientists have just won the Nobel Prize of Chemistry for their contribution to the genome editing technology, named ‘CRISPR Cas9’.*1 That makes possible to cut off the target sequence of genomes and insert a different sequence. Cas9 is an enzymatic protein that works like scissors.*2 The human genomes have been decoded and mapped. It is possible for this technology to be applied to the human genomes. ‘Designer baby’ is more realistic than ever. ‘What would you like our baby to look like, darling? My blue eyes or your brown ones?’ Will a conversation like this be common soon?

         The technology has an enormous possibility in several fields, particularly in medicine. The technology could be hopeful for people who have a serious disease such as HIV or hemophilia and are afraid of passing it on their children. Two years ago, Chinese scientists produced twin babies applying the technology, ‘CRISPR’, in order to prevent the babies from being infected with HIV because their father had the disease.*3 One of the scientists claimed that their achievement in giving the resistance to HIV to the babies could lead to taking fear of infectious disease away from human beings.

         But there is one question popping up: Is practicing the technology directly to the human embryos ethically acceptable, even with such a good intention? Some people may think that the human embryos are already human lives and using the technology directly to them is equivalent to God’s deed, so that should not be done by human. President Bush banned the human embryonic stem cell researches in 2001 for a similar reason. Moreover, the technology makes errors and those errors could cause serious consequences to the babies. Who would take responsibility if that happens and how? The science community needs careful discussion about using the technology. And people also have to know more about it.

         I think that making use of the genetic editing technology to the human genomes should be limited to developing treatments to cure and prevent of serious illnesses like cancer. We all need a thorough discussion: The scientists need a discussion to make ethical and judicial rules stricter than ever for researching with it and applying it to medicine. People also have to learn more and have their own opinions about the technology. I believe that parents should not genetically modify their unborn child only because they want their baby to have any particular appearance or ability. You should not use the term, ‘designer baby’, so lightly. That’s the issue of the human life.