Greetings, my name is John Doe and I am a resident of New York City. I am writing this op-ed to express my thoughts on the expansion of the United States to the west.
As many of you may know, the United States recently completed the Transcontinental Railroad, connecting the East and West Coasts for the first time in history. This achievement has greatly impacted the country, both positively and negatively.
One of the major positives of this expansion is the economic growth it has brought to the country. The railroad has made it easier for goods and resources to be transported across the country, resulting in increased trade and job opportunities. This has led to a boost in the economy, particularly in western states such as California and Nevada.
However, the expansion also brought negative consequences. The displacement of Native American tribes and the destruction of their land and way of life is a tragic result of the expansion. The government's policies of forced relocation and the taking of their land has had a devastating impact on these communities.
In conclusion, while the expansion of the United States to the west has brought economic growth and new opportunities, it also has brought about negative consequences. As a country, we must acknowledge and take responsibility for the harm caused to indigenous communities and take steps towards reconciliation and reparations. As for my opinion, I believe that the expansion brought more good than bad, but we should always be aware of the negative consequences and work to mitigate them.
Hello, I hope I have helped.
Answer:
Hello,(your name), I am an American living in New York. Recently, our country has been considering the expansion of the United States to the west. As a resident of New York and a concerned citizen, I feel compelled to share my thoughts on the positives and negatives of this potential expansion.
In 1803, the United States made a monumental purchase – the Louisiana Purchase. This acquisition was a major step forward in expanding the United States to the west, and it doubled the size of our nation. With this purchase, the new land opened up opportunities for settlement and economic growth. It also created an easier route for transportation and communication across the United States.
However, with the expansion of the United States to the west, there were some drawbacks. Native Americans were forced to give up their land and the rights to it. This was a major negative in terms of the expansion to the west, as it caused a great deal of hardship for the Native Americans and resulted in a loss of their culture. Additionally, the new territories were often plagued by violence, poverty, and disease.
In conclusion, I believe that the expansion of the United States to the west has had both positive and negative consequences. The Louisiana Purchase was a major step forward in the growth of the United States and opened up many opportunities for settlers and economic growth. However, it also resulted in the displacement of Native Americans and the destruction of their culture. While the expansion of the United States to the west may have had both positive and negative consequences, it is ultimately up to the citizens of the United States to decide whether or not this expansion is in the best interest of our nation.
Explanation:
dagdagan mo na lang
PLEASE HELP FOR 100 POINTS
Throughout history, major events have brought about significant changes, which have had tremendous effects on government, the economy, and society.
In a well-developed essay, summarize the important events of the Expansion and Reform era and their effects. Include specific details and examples to support your discussion.
Answer:
Explanation:
How can citizens of a country affect change for the common good?
The French commentator on American society in the 1830s, Alexis de Toqueville, observed that Americans are very quick to join together to promote whatever causes they favor. There was certainly evidence around him. Reforms on many issues — temperance, abolition, prison reform, women's rights, missionary work in the West — fomented groups dedicated to social improvements.
Often these efforts had their roots in Protestant churches. In addition to their efforts to convert new members based on their religious beliefs, several denominations were willing to turn to the government to make the entire population comply with their version of morality. Methodists, Presbyterians, Congregationalists and Baptists were among the most prominent in the reform movements. Often advocates called for conventions to draft resolutions to present to government officials and followed up with letter writing campaigns. They formed local societies that wrote letters to newspapers and sponsored speakers to try to broaden support for the cause. While it was usually not women's place to speak in public at the time, reform movements frequently called on women who could set aside social customs when it was in a good cause.
Reform Movements in America
The abolition of slavery was one of the most powerful reform movements. Quakers and many churches in New England saw slavery as an evil that must be abolished from society. They targeted slave owners who profited off of enslaved people's labor. Harriot Tubman, who helped people escape, and Frederick Douglass, a self-educated and forceful orator and writer, proved be powerful speakers. Abolitionists came to the defense of African Americans accused of running from their masters when law officials threatened to return them. Abolitionism was anathema to Southerners and not popular in many areas of the North, but they moved slavery to a central focus in American political life.
The temperance crusade also had its roots in American Protestant churches, often in tandem with abolition. In slavery, the slave owners oppressed their human property. In the temperance perspective, saloon owners took advantage of human weakness (primarily men's weakness) to profit off customers' inability to avoid strong drink. Alcohol ruined families and bred crime, especially in the growing urban centers of the East. Drinking was sinful, and it was the government's responsibility to remove this temptation, in the view of the temperance advocates. They ran candidates on the Prohibition Party in elections, who were rarely successful, and pressured elected officials to make the manufacture and sale of alcohol illegal. In Iowa, temperance was one of the major issues dividing the two parties from the Civil War through the early 20th century. The state almost passed an amendment enshrining temperance into the constitution. The 18th amendment to the U.S. Constitution imposed temperance standards across the nation, but slightly more than a decade later, the 21st amendment repealed it. Enforcement had become too great a burden on law enforcement, and too many people objected to this restriction.
Other reforms attracted similar attention, though never to the degree of prohibition and abolition. Some groups advocated for better treatment of the insane and more humane prisons. Advocates for women's rights used tactics similar to the prohibition and abolition movements to demand the right to vote. In fact, many of the same people participated in several reform causes.
Reform movements bring issues into public discussion. One set of reformers will usually generate opposing groups who often use the same techniques to persuade public opinion and elected officials. Debates over abortion and same-sex marriage are modern equivalents of some 19th century reform movements and often employ the same tactics. Demands for reform inject energy and new ideas into political debate and can keep the landscape shifting.
Select the correct answer. which is the earliest document to which the united states can trace its democratic heritage? a. magna carta b. english bill of rights c. mayflower compact d. declaration of independence
One of the earliest and most renowned documents from which the United States can trace its democratic past is the Magna Carta. The right response is A.
The Magna Carta established the idea of consultative government, a cornerstone of contemporary democracy. Many of the requirements of the Magna Carta limited the King's capacity to raise money.
Why has the Magna Carta been so crucial to democracy throughout history?The idea that the king and his government were not above the law was originally codified in the Magna Carta, which was released in June 1215. By creating law as a power unto itself, it sought to prevent the king from abusing his position and put limits on royal authority.
Learn more about Magna Carta here:
brainly.com/question/549211
#SPJ4
how did the parties win the revolutionary war
Answer:
The Revolutionary War was an insurrection by American Patriots in the 13 colonies to British rule, resulting in American independence.
Explanation:
Great work, keep it up!
1. How does agreeing to the follow the rules and
laws of a group make a government more
effective? (Why or Why Not)
2. Would it be a good idea to have a "civil body
politic" in a classroom, after school activity or
school? (Explain Your Answer)
Answer:
1. Agreeing to follow rules and maintain order, makes a government more effective as it allows the government to actually function properly.
2. Yes.
Explanation:
1. Agreeing to follow rules is important because if the government did not follow rules and laws, it would practically be anarchy within the government. Nothing would ever get done, and crimes would be committed every day if there was no universal agreement to follow the rules.
2. It is a good idea to install a civil body in a classroom, as it can teach students the importance of government and why it is important to have a government in the first place.
What is personal narrative in your own words?
Personal history (PN) is an unconventional prose story that describes a personal experience and is typically written in the first person. A story with one's life and experiences is referred to as "personal." Literature that doesn't conform to the standard definition of a story is referred to as "nontraditional."
This could be a story from your youth, an experience, a special trip, or a memory. For instance, whether you're writing a paper for school, your teacher can advise you to stick with a particular theme. You could talk about your work journey whether you're sending a personal essay with your college application. A personal narrative is a story you decide to tell your audience because it illustrates how you see the world, yourself, and/or other people. A personal narrative is a piece of factual writing that is based on the ideas, emotions, and experiences of the author. The author uses their own life experiences to create a story that is presented in the first person. Whatever the motivation, it's critical to craft a strong personal narrative essay. It enables sharing.
Learn more about story
https://brainly.com/question/896643
#SPJ4
How do electoral college favor states with large numbers of electoral votes
The Electoral College favors states with large numbers of electoral votes because the number of electoral votes allocated to each state is determined by the state's population. The more people living in a state, the more electoral votes that state is allocated. This means that states with larger populations have a proportionally greater influence in the election than states with smaller populations. For example, a state with a population of 10 million people will have more electoral votes than a state with a population of 1 million people.
In practice, this means that states with larger populations, such as California and Texas, have more electoral votes and therefore more influence in the outcome of presidential elections than smaller states like Wyoming or Vermont. Additionally, many states have the winner-takes-all system, meaning the winner of the popular vote in the state gets all the electoral votes for that state, this also favors the states with large population. This can lead to a situation where candidates may focus more on winning the support of voters in large population states, rather than trying to gain support from voters in smaller states.
dwight eisenhower is known for planning which part of world war II?
a. World War II is one of the most tragic events in the history of the 20th century. b. Dwight D. Eisenhower was always interested in military history and hoped to become a soldier. c. He entered the Military Academy at West Point in 1911. When World War I began a young man started training tank crews and was considered as a good specialist.
d. Five days after the December 7, 1941 Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, Eisenhower was summoned to the War Department by Chief of Staff George C. Marshall. The Philippines and the Far East was a crisis. Marshall wanted an officer with the knowledge of the Philippines. Eisenhower passed the interview test with General Marshall and was made the War Planner for the Philippines and the Far East. This assignment commenced Eisenhower’s meteoric rise in World War II.
Dwight D. Eisenhower is known for arranging and telling the D-Day intrusion during The Second Great War.
He filled in as the Preeminent Commandant of the United Powers in Europe and supervised the fruitful intrusion of Normandy on June 6, 1944, which was a defining moment in the conflict for the Partners.
The 34th Leader of the US was Dwight D. Eisenhower, likewise alluded to as "Ike," a five-star general in the US Armed force. As the Preeminent Administrator of the Unified Powers in Europe during The Second Great War, he was responsible for sorting out and driving Activity Master, the D-Day attack. Quite possibly the greatest military activity in history occurred on June 6, 1944, when a significant land and/or water-capable attack on Normandy, France, occurred.
Learn more about Dwight eisenhower:
https://brainly.com/question/18370185
#SPJ4
In 1902, coal miners went on strike and the mine operators refused to bargain. Five months into the strike, coal reserves ran low and president theodore roosevelt intervened. Both sides finally agreed to have a third party work out a compromise settlement. What did president roosevelt's actions demonstrate?.
President roosevelt actions demonstrate that belief in the importance of labor-management cooperation, the need for a fair and reasonable compromise between the two sides.
President Theodore Roosevelt actions in the 1902 coal miners' strike demonstrate his willingness to use his executive power to intervene in labor disputes and to try and find a compromise solution. President Roosevelt's intervention in the strike was a demonstration of his belief in the importance of labor-management cooperation, and that disputes between labor and management should be resolved through peaceful means rather than through violent clashes. He also believed in the need for a fair and reasonable compromise between the two sides, recognizing that neither side would be able to achieve all of their demands. His actions also demonstrated his belief in the importance of maintaining a stable and reliable supply of coal, which was a vital resource for industry and transportation during that time. As the strike had been going on for five months, the coal reserves were running low, and the President feared that the prolonged strike would cause a national crisis. By intervening and bringing the two sides together, President Roosevelt was able to bring the strike to an end and avoid a potential crisis. He was able to use his executive power and his position as a neutral third party to broker a compromise settlement that was acceptable to both sides. This showed his ability as a leader to find solutions to complex problems and his willingness to use his executive power to bring about positive change.
To know more about Roosevelt please refer: https://brainly.com/question/14014275
#SPJ4
A government is laissez-faire when it
Temples were built in the shape of:
ziggurats
pyramids
circular towers
Temples were built in the shape of ziggurats. The Option A is correct.
What are ziggurats structured temple?A ziggurat is a pyramidal stepped temple tower that was an architectural and religious structure common in Mesopotamia (now primarily in Iraq) from around 2200 to 500 BCE.
The ziggurat was always constructed with a mud brick core and an exterior covered in baked brick. It had no internal chambers and was typically square or rectangular in shape, averaging 170 feet (50 metres) square or 125 170 feet (40 50 metres) at the base. There are approximately 25 known ziggurats, which are evenly distributed among Sumer, Babylonia, and Assyria.
Read more about Temples
brainly.com/question/29212136
#SPJ1
Which of the following represents laws that were created/change during the progressive movement? select 3
The Mann-Elkins Act's dissolution of the Standard Oil Company, Bureau of Mines. Ballinger-Pinchot debate incorrect response(s) Price-Aldrich Tariff
What are the three most significant developments in legislation during the Progressive Era?During the Progressive era, four constitutional amendments were passed, allowing for the direct election of senators, granting the right to vote to women, authorizing an income tax, and outlawing the production and distribution of alcoholic beverages.The establishment of a more open and accountable government that would seek to advance American society was something that progressives were interested in. These reformers supported legislation that would have enhanced political rights for women and American workers as well as reforms to the civil service and regulations governing food safety.The Mann-Elkins Act's dissolution of the Standard Oil Company, Bureau of Mines. Ballinger-Pinchot debate incorrect response(s) Price-Aldrich Tariff.To learn more about Progressive era refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8179112
#SPJ1
How did the Protestant reformation impact the development of nation-states?
The Protestant Reformation of the 16th century had a significant impact on the development of nation-states.
What are the effects of European Christianity?One of its main effects was the fragmentation of European Christianity into multiple denominations, which in turn led to the development of new, distinct national identities. This was particularly evident in the Holy Roman Empire, where the rise of Protestantism led to the formation of new, independent states, such as Sweden and Denmark.
Additionally, the Reformation also led to the rise of powerful absolute monarchies, such as the one in England, which were able to use their newfound religious autonomy to consolidate their power and establish centralized, nation-state systems of governance. Overall, the Protestant Reformation played a key role in shaping the political and cultural landscape of Europe and laid the foundations for the development of modern nation-states.
To know more about Protestant Reformation, visit:
brainly.com/question/2973841
#SPJ1
The Declaration of Independence included grievances regarding which of the following
matters? Select all that apply.
A.) unjust taxation
B.) religious liberty
C.) trade restrictions
D.) freedom of speech
E.) quartering of troops
Unfair taxation, trade limitations, and quartering for soldiers are a few of the principal criticisms of the Declaration of Independence.
How were the colonists taxed unfairly?Since Americans had no say in the process, they believed it was unfair for Parliament to impose tax obligations on them. Most colonial governments were governed by governors chosen by Britain rather than being headed by Americans. It was universally accepted that people shouldn't be subject to taxes until they are represented by a member of parliament.
What exactly does the freedom of speech mean?The First Amendment protects our freedom to free speech and association, so the government cannot stop us from saying or writing what we want; we have the right to free expression and association.
To know more about Declaration of Independence visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14578050
#SPJ1
How much majority is required to make an amendment in the Constitution in Pakistan?
Each House has to form an amendment to the Constitution in Pakistan and hand over the Bill with a two- thirds majority of the entire membership of that House.
If the 2nd House passes the Bill with amendments it's appertained back to the House in which it began and if that House agrees to those emendations with a two- thirds majority it's transferred to the President for assent. If the 2nd House doesn't agree to the Bill or the emendations the affair ends there and also.
Indigenous correction Bill which seeks to alter the extents of a province shall correspondingly be reached by the Provincial Assembly of that province by the votes of not lower than two- thirds of its entire class.
To learn more about constitution of Pakistan,
https://brainly.com/question/29766808
#SPJ4
In your own words, describe how mita worked.
Mita worked by forcing people to work in mines and agriculture. It also made people to work for the economy of the colonial Spanish.
What was the Mita system?
Mita, also known as "mita labor" or "repartimiento" was a system used in the Spanish colonies in the Americas, particularly in the Andes, during the 16th to 18th centuries. It was a form of forced labor that required the indigenous population to work in mines, agriculture, and other economic activities.
Under the mita system, the Spanish colonial government would divide the indigenous population into groups, known as "mitayos". Each group would be responsible for providing a certain number of workers for a set period of time. These workers would then be forced to leave their homes and families to work in mines, on plantations, or on public projects such as roads, bridges, and buildings. They would be under the control of the colonizers and worked under harsh conditions, without pay and without the right to leave.
The mita system was used to extract the abundant natural resources of the colonies, including gold and silver. The indigenous populations were forced to work long hours, and many died from disease, starvation, or mistreatment.
Read more on Mita here: https://brainly.com/question/10113738
#SPJ1
Write a comparison and contrast paper expressing how life in Georgia was different before the Civil Rights Movement and how some things are still the same. Be sure to include details linked to Jim Crow, Plessy vs Ferguson, race riots, and disenfranchisement in your writing.
Answer:
Explanation: The only way I can answer is on paper
The Common Era began at which event?
A. The start of the Han dynasty
B. The birth of Jesus of Nazareth
C. The fall of the Roman Empire
OD. The invention of the automobile
SUBMIT
The correct option is B. The Common Era began at the birth of Jesus of Nazareth. However, there is claim that BC/AD is only a reference to Common Era beginning, but it indicates the significance of Christ's birth with the beginning of new "common era."
What defines a common era?The period from the birth of Jesus Christ until the Christian calendar begins counting years in the Western calendar: A 1st-century AD synagogue was unearthed here.
What are BCE and CE in history?CE stands for "common (or current) era" and BCE stands for "before common (or current) era". These abbreviations have a shorter history than BC or AD, but they go back to at least the early 18th century.
What is current Common Era?2023 CE: Common Era and Before the Common Era replace the original AD (Anno Domini) and BC ( Before Christ ) notation used for the same calendar epoch. The two notations are numerically equivalent: "2023 CE" and "AD 2023" represent the current year "400 BCE" and "400 BC". are the same year.
To learn more about Common Era visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17250859
#SPJ1
Why did the United States end its neutrality during World War I?
Answer: Two of the primary reasons had to do with threats due to the offensive tactics from the Germans.
Explanation: Staying out of the war also allowed the U.S to economically recover from a slowdown.
What happened a week after the second wave of feminism
Answer:
Second Wave Feminism: Collections. The second wave feminism movement took place in the 1960s and 1970s and focused on issues of equality and discrimination. Starting initially in the United States with American women, the feminist liberation movement soon spread to other Western countries.
Is someone still alive from World War 1?
No, The last combat veteran was Claude Choules, who served in the British Royal Navy in World War 1 died on 5 May 2011.
The war also had a significant cultural impact, with the emergence of new artistic movements and the rise of political ideologies such as communism and fascism. In addition, the war had a major impact on the way wars were fought, with the introduction of new weapons and tactics such as tanks, chemical weapons, and aerial bombardment.
World War 1 led to the downfall of many empires in Europe. Additionally, the British were seen as a symbol of democracy and freedom, and many Americans wanted to support a nation that shared similar values. There is no one alive who served in World War 1.
To know more about War, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ4
What type of satire is a Modest Proposal?
A Modest Proposal is an example of a Juvenalian satire for stopping the children of poor people from becoming a burden to their parents or country, and for rendering them beneficial to the public.
What is a Modest Proposal?In 1729, Jonathan Swift wrote and anonymously published a Juvenalian satire essay with the title 'A Modest Proposal' for stopping the children of poor people from becoming a burden to their parents or country, and for rendering them beneficial to the public.
What is satire?In the visual, literary, and performing arts, satire is a genre in which vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule. It typically takes the form of fiction, though non-fiction is occasionally used as well. This is done frequently in an effort to shame or expose the perceived flaws of people, businesses, the government, or society itself and spur them to change. Although satire is typically intended to be funny, its main objective is frequently constructive social critique, employing wit to call attention to both specific and general faults in society.
Learn more about Juvenalian satire:
brainly.com/question/30147931
#SPJ4
Charles X tried to return absolute monarchy to France in the late 1820s.
How did the citizens of France respond?
A.) French nobles fled to Italy and Russia to spread French influence
B.) Citizens lined up to join the military and fight for French greatness
C.) They celebrated and welcomed the absolute control of the king
D.) Fighting in the streets of Paris resulted in the King removed from his
throne
Answer:
D.) Fighting in the streets of Paris resulted in the King removed from his throne
Explanation:
When Charles X tried to return absolute monarchy to France in the late 1820s, the citizens of France did not respond positively. Charles X's attempts to limit the power of the press and the right to vote, as well as his attempts to restore the privileges of the French nobility, were met with widespread opposition. This led to fighting in the streets of Paris, known as the July Revolution, which resulted in Charles X being removed from his throne and replaced by Louis-Philippe, who established a constitutional monarchy.
Dbq evaluate the relative importance of the causes of the civil war in the period from 1830 to 1861.
Answer:
-Slavery. At the heart of the divide between the North and the South was slavery. ...
-States' Rights. The idea of states' rights was not new to the Civil War. ...
-Expansion. ...
-Industry vs. ...
-Bleeding Kansas. ...
-Abraham Lincoln. ...
-Secession. ...
-Activities.
In one sentence, explain why Central Asia is important to history.
Answer: Asia is important to history because it pioneered many important technologies we still use today like the printing press, paper money and more. As a continent it made strides in strengthening its own power, while preventing major attacks from other imperialist powers up until the 1750-1900's period when Europe, Russia etc attempted to carve out areas of influence.
Explanation:
Answer:
Central Asia was historically connected to the Silk Road trade routes, acting as an intersection point for the movement of people, goods, and ideas between Europe and the Far East.
Explanation:
Zadok was a:
king
priest
prophet
servant
Answer:
Zadok was the High Priest of Israel during the reigns of David and Solomon.
Zadok was a High Priest of Israel during the reigns of David and Solomon (2 Samuel 8:16–18).
Who was Zadok?Zadok son of Ahitub was a Levite priest during the time of King David. For a long time, he was co-high priest with Abiathar. Zadok was a descendant of Aaron and a leader over his family of Levites (1 Chronicles 27:17).Therefore, Zadok was a High Priest of Israel during the reigns of David and Solomon (2 Samuel 8:16–18).
Learn more about Zadok here: https://brainly.com/question/14496347
#SPJ4
how did mulroney's ideas about government differ from those of liberals? what other politicians inspired Conservative policies?
Sir John A. Macdonald, who served as prime minister in 1887 and 1891, was the first conservative leader to do so. In the 1983 race for the leadership of the Progressive Conservatives, Mulroney beat Joe Clark, and in the 1984 election, he defeated John Turner as prime minister.
What are the main ideas of the Conservative Party of Canada?The Conservative Party's program now declares that its main goals are to safeguard the lives and property of common individuals, advance democratic accountability, and restructure the senate to make it a fully elected parliament. Conservatives supported tradition, culture, and nationally distinct views and practices and believed that these elements influenced societal developments on the outside. The fundamental tenet of conservatism was the emphasis on tradition, existing institutions, and established practices.
Learn more about Conservative policies, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14641810
#SPJ1
What was a victory garden What was its purpose who would plant one?
Answer:
A victory garden was planted at a residence so me and you would grow one and the purpose of them was too save rations for the troops and they helped in morale and shown patriotism
What does the Carew murder case reveal about Hyde?
The validates Utterson's concerns about Hyde's bad persona. Because the maid recognised Hyde, Hyde is now wanted for murder.
Hyde killed the elderly guy by swinging his hefty walking stick at him. In fact, the impact of his strikes was so loud that "bones were audibly snapped," and after that, Hyde "trampled the elderly man underfoot with ape-like rage." By consuming cyanide, he committed .Hyde attacked him most likely because he knew he was a nice man, and evil preys on virtue. Carew's innocence draws attention to Hyde's evil deeds. "A of extraordinary brutality, made all the more memorable by the high status of the victim, stunned London."
To learn more about Hyde click the link below:
brainly.com/question/8709596
#SPJ4
How did the Great Migration impact African American?
The Great Migration had a huge impact on African Americans. It marked a major shift in the African American population, shifting it from the rural south to the urban north.
This allowed African Americans to find employment opportunities, receive higher wages, and escape the oppressive racial climate of the south. The migration also created a new African American cultural and political identity, allowing for a stronger sense of community.
It allowed for the development of the Harlem Renaissance and for African Americans to become influential in the arts, literature, and politics. The Great Migration ultimately helped African Americans to gain more autonomy, rights, and opportunities and also created a new identity for African Americans.
To know more about Great Migration refer to the link brainly.com/question/29555473
#SPJ4
Which of these words best describes mrs. flint as she’s described in this passage? weak nervous cold-hearted
The best word that describes Mrs. flint as she's described in this passage is weak.
Mrs. Flint is a harsh and pointlessly merciless mistress; she refuses to offer even leftover meals to her slaves, and she or he makes Linda pass barefoot withinside the snow due to the fact the noise of her footwear bothers her. Linda factors out the ironic comparison among her weak point in terms of family paintings and her electricity in causing violence on folks who are powerless towards her. Mrs. Flint is in particular competitive closer to Linda due to her husband’s apparent sexual hobby in her, and inflicts mental and bodily violence on her no matter Linda’s apparent loss of obligation for the situation. Meanwhile, Mrs. Flint’s lack of ability to earn recognize from her husband or persuade him to promote Linda well-known shows her personal powerlessness in her marriage, a function that Linda argues could be ameliorated if slavery did now no longer exist.
To learn more about harsh check the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/26144434
#SPJ4
Answer: its D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Explanation: