Answer:
D. The government may not inflict cruel punishment.
Explanation:
This part of the Declaration of Independence refers to the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects against the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment. This amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, which is a group of amendments to the Constitution that were added shortly after the Constitution was adopted. The Eighth Amendment adds the idea that the government is not allowed to inflict punishment that is deemed to be cruel or unusual, and it sets limits on the amount of bail or fines that may be imposed. This idea is an important part of the American political system, as it helps to ensure that the government is not able to abuse its power and that the rights of individuals are protected.
"I. Natural Rights of the Colonists as Men. All men have a right to remain in a state of nature as long as they please; and in case of intolerable oppression, civil or religious, to leave the society they belong to, and enter into another.
When men enter into society, it is by voluntary consent; and they have a right to demand and insist upon the performance of such conditions and previous limitations as form an equitable original compact.
Every natural right not expressly given up, or, from the nature of a social compact, necessarily ceded, remains."—The Rights of the Colonists, Samuel Adams, 1772
"So that the social pact will not become meaningless words, it tacitly includes this commitment, which alone gives power to the others: Whoever refuses to obey the general will shall be forced to obey it by the whole body politic, which means nothing else but that he will be forced to be free. This condition is indeed the one which by dedicating each citizen to the fatherland gives him a guarantee against being personally dependent on other individuals. It is the condition which all political machinery depends on and which alone makes political undertakings legitimate. Without it, political actions become absurd, tyrannical, and subject to the most outrageous abuses."—Jean Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract, 1763
Which U.S. document balances ideas championed by Enlightenment philosophers with the idea of Social Commitment outlined by Rousseau? (1 point)
The Articles of Confederation
The Federalist No. 10
The Constitution
The Northwest Ordinance
Answer:
The Constitution
Explanation:
When historians investigate how the Spanish and Portuguese built their empires, they notice
When historians investigate how the Spanish and Portuguese built their empires, they notice many similarities between how the two countries engaged in this process. Option A
What are the Spanish and Portuguese empires?Generally, During the Age of Exploration and Conquest, which started in the late 15th century and continued until the late 18th century, Spain and Portugal, respectively, were the countries that governed the lands and colonies that came to be known as the Spanish and Portuguese empires.
The Spanish Empire was one of the greatest empires in world history.
It stretched over four continents, including Europe, North and South America, and parts of Africa and Asia.
The Portuguese Empire was also a very extensive empire, but its primary objective was to colonize Brazil as well as other areas in Africa and Asia.
Read more about the Spanish and Portuguese empires
https://brainly.com/question/8098815
#SPJ1
Which statement correctly summarizes a motivation for imperialism?
Answer:
c
Explanation:
a and d u can cross out so i believe its c
What role did the military play in the decision of Korematsu v United States
Welcome to the app & Id be glad to help
Answer:
It was a crucial piece of the end result
Explanation:
The detention held for disobeying a military order has nothing to do with race but is as stated by the court a "military necessity". As anyone else who would or has done the same would go through the same punishment.
Let me know if you got any questions!!!
why was there a push for change in Georgia by people like the Bourbon Triumvirate and Henry Grady?
HELP!!!!!
The Bourbon Triumvirate and Henry Grady, who were leaders in Georgia during the late 19th century, pushed for change in the state because they believed that the traditional agricultural economy of the state was holding it back from reaching its full potential.
Why did Henry Grady Push for Change in Georgia?The Bourbon Triumvirate and Henry Grady advocated for industrialization and modernization, and promoted the idea of a "New South" that would be more economically and socially progressive. They also believed that the state should move away from its reliance on cotton as the main source of income, and instead focus on other industries such as manufacturing and transportation.
Additionally, they were vocal critic of the then-existing racial segregation and supported for civil rights for the black population of the state.
Learn more about Henry Grady here: https://brainly.com/question/8142884
#SPJ1
What statement best summarizes the population decline of Native Americans?
A: Native Americans encountered many European diseases, but were able to successfully overcome them.
B: A civil war among Native Americans killed many and left many wounded.
C: Native Americans were affected the most by malnutrition, which led to many Native Americans dying.
D: Hard labor, malnutrition, and diseases from Europeans led millions of Native Americans to die.
Answer:
Option d
Explanation:
its because all the other options are not appropriate. The Spanish and Portuguese brought small to the native America’s and conquered the land
Mark me as the brainliest pls
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Which of these events ultimately led to World War I? Choose three answers.
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand angered Austria.
0 Serbia declared war
on Austria, which caused Austria's allies to go to war.
O Nationalism increased tensions in the Balkan peninsula.
D Russia's mobilization plan called for an invasion of France through Belgium.
O Alliances caused a chain of events that pulled
each country into war.
Answer:
O The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand angered Austria.
O Nationalism increased tensions in the Balkan peninsula.
O Alliances caused a chain of events that pulled each country into war.
These events ultimately led to World War I are:
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand angered Austria.Nationalism increased tensions in the Balkan peninsula.Alliances caused a chain of events that pulled each country into war.What is World War I?A war in which all or almost all the major nations of the world participate” is referred to as a world war. The Great War began in 1914 and is occasionally referred to as World War I. World War I is the most famous war in history. The primary affected to the military and nationalism.
According to the important event led to World War I. During the period of June 28, 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand are the assassination. it was the spread of ideas of romantic nationalism is the main reason to the increased the tensions in the Balkan peninsula. Alliances were the pulled each country into war.
As a result, the significance of the World War I are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (a), (c) and (e) is correct.
Learn more about on World War I, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ2
What was it like to be a soldier in the Continental Army?
Answer:
Life in the Continental Army was difficult. It was mundane and monotonous. Generally, when not engaged in combat, soldiers in the Continental Army served three duties: fatigue or manual labor, such as digging vaults (latrines), clearing fields, or erecting fortifications.Much evidence supports the theory of continental drift. One piece of evidence is the complementary shapes of Earth's coastlines.
Which example is another piece of evidence?
O testing of ocean water
O similar fossils found on different continents
O rock structures found only on one continent
O patterns of ancient rainfall
Similar fossils found on different continents.
What is the evidence for the continental drift theory?The fit of the continents, the distribution of prehistoric fossils, rocks, and mountain ranges, as well as the placements of prehistoric climatic zones, were all used as evidence for continental drift. Their theory of continental drift is supported by a number of lines of evidence, including the fit of the continents, paleoclimate indicators, truncated geologic structures, and fossils.
Alfred Wegener put forth the Theory of Continental Drift in 1912. His theory was supported by a number of pieces of evidence, including fossils, rocks, glacial traces, coal deposits, and the way the continents fit together like a jigsaw puzzle.
To know more about paleoclimate :
https://brainly.com/question/26007315
#SPJ1
Why are primary sources important when studying historical events?
Choose all that apply to the Articles of Confederation:
Choose all that apply to the Articles of Confederation:
Established the Electoral College.
Every state was its own "country."
Could not raise taxes.
Established the United States.
Established a weak central government.
Set up the 3 branched governmental system we have today.
What applies to the Articles of Confederation are:
Created the Electoral College.Each state was its own "country".Founded the United States.What is the 3 branch government system like?The current government system is divided into 3 branches that act to balance government powers. Are they:
LegislativeExecutiveJudiciaryTherefore, the articles of confederation were the first US documents, and the division into 3 branches helps in the control of power by a governmental body and greater autonomy of decisions.
Find out more about Articles of Confederation on:
https://brainly.com/question/13152253
#SPJ1
What was an outcome of the War of 1812?
A.
impressment of US soldiers
B.
unchanged US borders
C.
the Embargo Act
D.
the Nonintercourse Act
An outcome of the War of 1812 was unchanged US borders. By efficiently protecting its colonies in North America, Britain ended up winning the War of 1812. The correct option is (B).
What do you mean by the War of 1812?The United States, Great Britain, and Great Britain's Native American allies engaged in a military war on the North American continent known as the War of 1812, which lasted from June 18, 1812, to February 18, 1815.
The relationship between the United States and Great Britain after the American Revolution was far from ideal.
The British attempts to stifle American trade, the Royal Navy's recruitment of American seamen, and American territorial ambitions were among the factors that led to the war.
Therefore, an outcome of the War of 1812 was unchanged US borders. By efficiently protecting its colonies in North America, Britain ended up winning the War of 1812.
To know more about the War of 1812, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13899658
#SPJ1
A purpose of government in the United States is to
Protecting, upholding law and order, resolving social disputes, maintaining a healthy economy, and offering public services are all goals of the US government.
What is a social dispute?Social conflict arises when two or more persons disagree with one another in social interactions and use their reciprocal social power to promote their own interests while obstructing the other person's attempts to do the same.What are examples of disputes?For centuries, there has been debate over the text's author. a section of the city where two drug gangs are vying for control of the area Noun They were unable to come to an agreement. The management and the employees are engaged in a labour dispute. There is a land dispute involving the two farmers.To know more about social disputes, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7553943
#SPJ1
why did America have to build faster planes than the Russians?
During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union were engaged in a military and technological competition, known as the "arms race." One aspect of this competition was the development of faster and more advanced aircraft.
The United States saw the need to build faster planes than the Russians, as part of the overall strategic and technological competition between the two countries. Faster aircraft would give the United States an advantage in reconnaissance and strategic bombing, as well as in air-to-air combat. The development of faster planes would also demonstrate the technological superiority of the United States, which was seen as a way to deter the Soviet Union from aggressive actions and to boost the morale of the American people and the international community.
In addition, faster planes would also be useful for the United States' nuclear deterrent. The US had a strategic nuclear bombing force, which relied on bombers and by having faster planes, they would have a better chance of penetrating deep in Soviet airspace, increase the chances of delivering their payload, thus making the US nuclear deterrent more credible.
In summary, the United States saw the development of faster planes as an important aspect of the Cold War competition with the Soviet Union, as they believed that having faster planes would give them an advantage in reconnaissance and strategic bombing, as well as in air-to-air combat and improve the effectiveness of their nuclear deterrent.
Who were the principal patrons of Haydn and Mozart, and did the two composers maintain a good relationship with their respective patrons? Explain your answer.
I NEED HELPPPPPPP, PLSSS
They did continue to have a wonderful friendship. The Esterhazy family and Prince Paul Anton Esterhazy are Haydn's main supporters. Mozart's main patron is Prince Archbishop Hieronymus Colloredo of Salzburg.
Were Mozart and Haydn friends?According to sources written at the time, Mozart and Haydn rapidly grew close friends and expressed mutual admiration for one another. The two composers collaborated in impromptu quartets in Vienna throughout the 1780s, with Haydn playing violin and Mozart playing viola.
The Baron, a prominent figure in Vienna in the 1780s, was a man who sincerely liked music; . Along with Mozart, he also gave Beethoven and Haydn financial support—not in the form of a wage, but rather through the distribution of very significant gratuities.
To learn more about Mozart and Haydn
https://brainly.com/question/29024066
#SPJ1
How might the fall of Rome affect the development of separate societies in the East and West during the middle ages socially, politically, and economically?
(Minimum two paragraphs)
The disintegration of the Roman empire freed Europe from rule by a single power.
What is the meaning of the Roman Empire?The post-Republican era of ancient Rome was known as the Roman Empire. It was a kingdom with substantial territorial holdings in Europe, North Africa, as well as Western Asia that was governed by emperors.
One of the biggest and most significant civilizations in history, the Roman Empire lasted for more than a thousand years.
The Visigoths under Alaric's command invaded Rome in 410 CE and took control of the Roman Empire's capital city. The Visigoths rampaged through the city, destroying everything in their path as they burned, pillaged, and robbed. Three days were spent in the robbery.
Learn more about the Roman Empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/11415671
#SPJ1
please help!!
Once you have completed the “Digging Into Anthropology” activity in Chapter 4, please answer the following questions to the best of your ability.
1. Describe the results of your survey. What trends did you find in your data regarding why your participants classify themselves the way they do and what that classification means to them? Did any of your participants question the racial/ethnic classification system used in your society? If so, how so, and if not, why do you think they did not?
2. How do you classify your race and ethnicity? Why do you choose the classification you do, and what does it mean to you? Based on your own experience and the responses from your participants, how would you evaluate your society's racial and ethnic categories? Would you revise them? If so, why, and if not, why not?
3. Based on your experience with this activity and the content of this chapter, what role do you think anthropology plays—or should play—in challenging racism?
Answer:
1. The results of my survey indicated that most participants classified themselves in terms of their racial and ethnic backgrounds, with some also noting the importance of their cultural heritage. Most of the participants felt that their classification was an important part of their identity and that it was important to recognize and celebrate the diversity of backgrounds and cultures. A few participants did question the racial/ethnic classification system and felt that it was too restrictive and didn’t allow for self-expression and personal identity.
2. I classify myself as a mixed-race individual, with my heritage being a combination of African American, European, and Native American. For me, this classification is important because it reflects my unique identity and allows me to celebrate the diversity of my heritage. I believe that our society's racial and ethnic categories need to be more inclusive and should allow for more self-expression and personal identity. I would not revise them, however, as I think it is important to recognize and celebrate the diversity of backgrounds and cultures.
3. Anthropology can play a significant role in challenging racism by providing a deeper understanding of the various cultures, backgrounds, and identities that make up our society. Anthropologists can help to create a more inclusive and equitable society by researching and disseminating information about different cultures and identities, as well as advocating for greater recognition and appreciation of diversity. Additionally, anthropologists can provide valuable insight into how racism and discrimination affect different groups and how we can work to create a more equitable society.
Explanation:
Did Genghis khan promote people within his empire by bribery
Answer:
Explanation:
No, Genghis Khan did not promote people within his empire by bribery. Genghis Khan promoted people within his empire based on merit and loyalty. He believed that those who showed loyalty and skill should be rewarded, while those who were disloyal or not skilled should be punished.
Answer: No
Explanation:
Describe an oligopoly
Answer:
An oligopoly is a market structure with few firms. None of the firms can keep the other firms from having significant influence/higher ranking
Explanation:
hard to word but here u go
Which of the following did preachers Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield believe in
Preachers Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield believe in: D. establishing a personal relationship with God.
Who was George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards ?George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards were man of God who were know as a Christian leader during their life time.
Both of them were as well known as a preacher of the word of God due to the passion they both have for Christ. They both believed that people should tend to have a personal relationship with God.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards here:https://brainly.com/question/28812374
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Which of the following did preachers Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield believe in?
A. hierarchies within the church system
B. ritualistic worship
C. church is the only place God can be found
D. establishing a personal relationship with God
The church at the portrayed death as
Answer:
The church portrayed death as an inevitable part of life and a gateway to the afterlife.
Explanation:
What goals for Germany-both foreign and domestic- does Hitler set forth in Mein Kampf?
Mein Kampf, which translates to "My Struggle," preached the core ideas of Nazism, including virulent antisemitism, a racist worldview, and an assertive foreign policy designed to gain Lebensraum (land) in eastern Europe.
What was Hitler's ambition for Germany?Hitler's aim to reunite the German peoples and his quest of Lebensraum, or "living space," which would allow Germans to become militarily safe and economically self-sufficient, served as the primary motivators for his overarching ambition for territorial expansion.
The Nazi Party's ultimate goal was to overthrow Germany's parliamentary system, put Hitler as dictator, and forge a group of ethnically pure Germans who would be devoted to their führer and join him in a campaign of racial purging and global conquest.
To learn more about Hitler
https://brainly.com/question/12778492
#SPJ1
What was important about the Lewis and Clark Expedition?
________
(reporting wrong answers/spam)
(answer correctly for brainly)
________
1. It found a faster way for ships to get to the port of New Orleans.
2. It explored territory acquired in the Louisiana Purchase.
3. It revealed that gold was available in Kentucky.
4. It found a path through the Cumberland Gap.
The important aspects of the Lewis and Clark Expedition was option 2. It explored territory acquired in the Louisiana Purchase, which greatly expanded knowledge about the western region of the United States.
Who were Lewis and Clark expedition?The Lewis and Clark Expedition, also known as the Corps of Discovery Expedition, was an exploration journey undertaken by Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, commissioned by President Thomas Jefferson in 1803.
The expedition's main objective was to explore and map the newly acquired territory of the Louisiana Purchase, find a practical route across the western part of North America, and establish American presence in the region.
They set out from St. Louis in May 1804 and reached the Pacific Ocean in November 1805, making significant contributions to the understanding of the West and its resources.
learn more about Lewis and Clark expedition: https://brainly.com/question/14702270
#SPJ1
GIVING BRAINLIEST read the short document and answer please!
Answer:
desire of power and conflict and the other one is
Explanation:
the citizens are always suffering wanting desire of power
What powers does the constitution have that are presume to have delegated to the national government because it is government of a sovereign state within the world community
Under the US Constitution, the national government is given certain authority known as "delegated powers."
What is the delegation of power in government?A body or person transfers authority to another so they can act on his behalf through delegation. It enables the other person to carry out a task on behalf of the power donor. Consequently, a delegate is a person who has been appointed, authorized, empowered, or commissioned to act on behalf of the person who has granted him or their authority.
The National Government is presumed to have the authority that the Constitution granted it because it governs a state that enjoys sovereign status within the international community. For instance, inherent powers have the duty to safeguard... powers available to and used by both the national government and individual states.
Learn more about the delegation of power here:
https://brainly.com/question/7998117
#SPJ1
Thousands of amendments to the constitution have been proposed. Why do you think only 27 formal amendments have been added to the constitution
Due to informal amendments and how simple they are compared to formal amendments, there have only been 27 additions to the Constitution.
Why have the Constitution's official changes been made so infrequently?First, three-fourths of state conventions or state legislatures must support each amendment. Getting that many states to concur on a long-lasting amendment to the Constitution is exceedingly challenging. Consider the Equal Rights Amendment, or ERA, as an illustration. 1923 saw the introduction of the ERA.
Are there 27 formal or informal amendments?The Constitution has currently undergone 27 amendments. The U.S. Constitution has 27 amendments, which is what we call formal revisions.
To Know more about Constitution.
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
How did the burial of a wealthy person differ from that of an enslaved person? Choose two answers.
The wealthy had a more complex process.
The wealthy were wrapped in their clothes.
The wealthy had a ceremony.
The wealthy had perfumes in their bodies.
The wealthy had a ceremony.
The wealthy were wrapped in their clothes.
Explanation:The burial of a wealthy person differed from that of an enslaved person because the wealthy person typically had more resources and social status, which allowed for a more elaborate and costly burial process. This often included a ceremony or ritual to honor the deceased, as well as the use of fine clothing and perfumes to prepare the body for burial. In contrast, the burial of an enslaved person was often more basic and simple, with little attention given to the details of the process. Enslaved individuals may not have had access to the same resources or social status as wealthy individuals, and therefore may not have received the same level of burial rites.
HOPE IT HELPS!Answer: A & D
Explanation:
the guy on top of me was WRONG
pease help me with history i’ll give you brainlist
The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right by Jean-Jacques Rousseau is a 1762 book in which Rousseau theorized about the best way to establish a political community in the face of the problems of commercial society.
What is Social Contract?He argued that the most effective way of ensuring the security and continuing welfare of the people was to create a social contract in which an individual gives up some of his or her natural rights in return for the protection of the state. Rousseau's argument is based on the idea of a general will, or the collective will of the people as a whole, which he referred to as the "sovereign". This general will, he argued, is the source of justice and should be the basis of all government. He proposed that the people of a nation should meet in a kind of assembly, or "sovereign", and make decisions about the direction of the state. He also argued that the government should be responsible for providing for the needs of the people, such as education, health, and welfare.
To learn more about Social Contract
https://brainly.com/question/17260213
#SPJ1
Constitutional Reporter
Imagine you are a political reporter during the early years of the republic. Write a brief news arlicle about the debate over the U.S.
Constitution using the following words correctly.
Checks and balances ratification
Federalist
Antifederalists
Bill of Rights
Although many Federalists at the start argued against the necessity of a consignment of rights to make sure passage of the Constitution, they promised to add amendments to it particularly protecting character liberties.
Did federalists or Anti-Federalists aid the bill of rights?Antifederalists argued that a consignment of rights used to be essential because, the supremacy clause in combination with the integral and appropriate and established welfare clauses would permit implied powers that could endanger rights. Federalists rejected the proposition that a consignment of rights was once needed.
However, they did unite in their objection to the Constitution as it used to be proposed for ratification in 1787. The Anti-Federalists argued towards the enlargement of country wide power. They preferred small localized governments with limited countrywide authority as was exercised underneath the Articles of Confederation.
Learn more about Anti-Federalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/412270#SPJ1After you ask someone if they are okay and they say "Yes, just got a lot going on" Can you reply back "What's going on?" or that's disrespectful?