Select all the statements that show correct reasoning for finding 14/15÷7/5 Group of answer choices Multiplying 1415 by 5 and then by 17. Multiplying 1415 by 5 and then dividing by 7. Dividing 1415 by 5, and then multiplying by 17. Multiplying 1514 by 7 and then dividing by 5. Multiplying 14/15 by 7 and then multiplying by 15.

IF YOUR ANSWER IS INCORRECT OR BS I WILL GIVE YOU 0 STARS AND TAKE MY POINTS BACK!!!!!

Answer:

L spedd

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A.1 B.2 E.5 F.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps brainliest awnser pls

sus susussusususususususus

Answer:

4 better inbox

Step-by-step explanation:

2,520

Estimate 627 to 630

3.73's closest estimate is 4

So, 630*4=2,520

Answer:

  72 hectares

Step-by-step explanation:

The dimensions of the rectangle on the ground will be 20,000 times the dimensions shown in the drawing:

  20,000×3 cm = 60,000 cm = 600 m

  20,000×6 cm = 120,000 cm = 1200 m

The area of the land is ...

  A = LW = (1200 m)(600 m) = 720,000 m²

1 hectare is 10,000 m², so this is ...

  720,000 m² × (1 ha)/(10,000 m²) = 72 ha

The area of the plot is 72 hectares.

Answer:

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

The given point is (-2, 2).  A horizontal line passing through this point is x = 2.

Answer:

-12.13

Step-by-step explanation:

To add two negative numbers, drop the negative signs and add the two positive numbers. Then make the answer negative.

-9.24 + (-2.89) =

We are adding two negative numbers, -9.24 and -2.89.

Step 1: ignore the negative signs and add the number 9.24 + 2.89

9.24 + 2.89 = 12.13

Step 2: the answer is negative, so add a negative sign to the sum above.

-9.24 + (-2.89) = -12.13

Answer:

Total weekly earning = 11x + 9y

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) 11x + 9y = Total weekly earning

The required objective function is 11x + 9y which describes the total weekly earnings.

A linear function is defined as an equation in which the highest exponent of the variable is always one.

We have been given that a tutor makes $11 per hour while a teacher's aide receives $9 per hour.

Let's assume that x represents the number of hours each week spent tutoring and

y represents the number of hours each week spent as a teacher's aide.

According to the given information, we can write the linear function would be as:

⇒ 11x + 9y

Therefore, the required objective function is 11x + 9y which describes the total weekly earnings.

Learn more about the Linear functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/13738061

#SPJ2

Answer:

3/10

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to make them the same fraction.

2/5 = 4/10

3/10 =3/10

3/10 + 4/10 = 7/10

10/10 - 10/10 =3/10

3/10 is the amount of tigers.

Testing the hypothesis, it is found that since the p-value of the test is of 0.3015, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05, the data does not provide enough evidence to show that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of 23%, that is:

[tex]H_0: p = 0.23[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if this proportion is lower than 23%, that is:

[tex]H_1: p < 0.23[/tex]

The test statistic is given by:

[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

In which:

In this problem, the parameters are: [tex]p = 0.23, n = 1432, \overline{p} = \frac{321}{1432} = 0.2242[/tex]

Then, the value of the test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.2242 - 0.23}{\sqrt{\frac{0.23(0.77)}{1432}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = -0.52[/tex]

The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion of 0.2242 or below, which is the p-value of z = -0.52.

Since the p-value of the test is of 0.3015, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05, the data does not provide enough evidence to show that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/14639462

Answer:

The scale is 1:18 for the entire room, 1 inch in the diagram for 18 inches IRL

Step-by-step explanation:

12 inches = 1 foot

Convert the feet to inches, then divide both sides of the ratio by the # of inches in the diagram

So for length:

10:(15*12)

10:180

1:18

And for width:

8:12(12)

8:144

1:18

Answer:

18 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The question asks for scale of inches in the drawing and the actual room, so first convert 15 ft and 12 ft into inches.

1 foot= 12in x 1ft= 12 inches

15 feet= 12in x 15ft = 180 inches

12 feet= 12in x 12ft = 144 inches

The room is 180 inches long and 144 inches wide.

To find the scale, set up a proportion to the drawing to the room.

[tex]\frac{10}{8} =\frac{180}{144}[/tex]

You can see that the scale is 18 inches because to get from 180 to 10, you multiply by 18, and the same thing as 8, you would multiply 8 by 18 to get to 144.

Answer:

x = - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Don't let the points disturb you. They are actually meant to confuse you.

Answer:

Yes it is 4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  40 in

Step-by-step explanation:

For a width of w, the length is 3w and the area and perimeter are ...

  A = LW = (3w)(w) = 3w^2

  P = 2(L+W) = 2(3w +w) = 8w

We are given the area, so we can find w to be ...

  75 in^2 = 3w^2

  25 in^2 = w^2 . . . . . divide by 3

  5 in = w . . . . . . . . . square root

Then the perimeter is ...

  P = 8w = 8(5 in) = 40 in

Answer:

[tex] \because \:l_{1} \parallel \: l_{2} \\ \therefore m_{1} = m_{2} = \frac{1}{2} \\ \frac{y - 6}{x + 3} = \frac{1}{2} \\ y - 6 = \frac{1}{2}x + \frac{3}{2} \\ y = \frac{1}{2}x + \frac{3}{2} + 6\\ y = \frac{1}{2}x + \frac{15}{2}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]y=\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}x+\displaystyle\frac{15}{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

What we need to know:

1) Determine the slope (m)

[tex]y=\displaystyle\frac{1}{2} x+5[/tex]

From the given equation, we can tell that the slope is [tex]\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}[/tex]. Because parallel lines always have the same slope, the slope of the line we're solving for is therefore [tex]\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}[/tex] as well. Plug this into [tex]y=mx+b[/tex]:

[tex]y=\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}x+b[/tex]

2) Determine the y-intercept (b)

[tex]y=\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}x+b[/tex]

We're given that the line passes through the point (-3,6). Plug this into [tex]y=\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}x+b[/tex] and solve for b:

[tex]6=\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}(-3)+b\\\\6=\displaystyle\frac{-3}{2}+b\\\\b=\frac{15}{2}[/tex]

Therefore, the y-intercept is [tex]\displaystyle\frac{15}{2}[/tex]. Plug this back into [tex]y=\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}x+b[/tex]:

[tex]y=\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}x+\displaystyle\frac{15}{2}[/tex]

I hope this helps!

Answer:

Same thing as before

Convert into improper for it to be easier to solve

11/3 - 9/5

THe common multiple is 15 here

55/15 - 27/15 = 28/15

Now 28/15 into a mixed is

1 13/15

Answer:

  3

Step-by-step explanation:

5(9/12 -1/4) +0.5

= 5(9/12 -3/12) +1/2 . . . . . . express the fractions using a common denominator

= 5(6/12) +1/2 . . . . . . . add the fractions

= 5(1/2) +1/2 . . . . . . reduce the result

= (5 +1)(1/2) . . . . factor out 1/2 (easier than adding mixed numbers)

= 6/2 = 3

_____

A calculator can be a useful tool for evaluating numerical expressions.

Answer:

SSS:

Draw a triangle with sides of 2 cm, 3cm and 4cm and another one of 4cm, 6cm and 8 cm. Both will be SSS congruent.

SAS:

Draw a triangle with sides of 2 cm, 3 cm and another side of your choice. The angle between sides of 2 and 3 cm is 30 degrees. Now draw a triangle with sides of 4 cm, 6cm and another side of your choice (but this one cannot be the double of the 3rd side of the first triangle!) . The angle between the sides of 4 cm and 6 cm should be 60 degrees. Now you have 2 SAS congruent triangles.

Answer:if you know how to do this your smart and in two years if someone can Answer ill give you a mil in cash swear

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

√10/2

Step-by-step explanation:

I took le test

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Set a ratio:

Find  the value of x by cross-multiplication:

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Please mark brainliest

hope it helps

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

I just know

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question, I couldn't really tell what the chart looks like, so I am guessing it looks like this:

Sidewalk 1:

x  |  y

2  |  17

0  | 5

Sidewalk 2:

x  |  y

1  |  20

3  | 26

Part a.

Now, we have to write the equation for sidewalk 1 in slope-intercept form.

Slope-intercept form is represented as this: [tex]y=mx+b[/tex], where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. Because this is true for all values on the line, we can plug in values of the chart for Sidewalk 1.

[tex]17=2m+b\\5=0m+b[/tex]

Subtracting the second equation from the first, we have

[tex]12=2m[/tex], and [tex]m = 6[/tex].

Now, we can just plug 6 back into the first equation to get:

[tex]17=2(6)+b[/tex]  to get [tex]17 = 12 + b[/tex], and then [tex]b = 5[/tex].

Now, we can just rewrite slope intercept form for Sidewalk 1 to have

[tex]y=6x+5[/tex].

Part b.

Point-slope form is represented as [tex]y-y_1=m(x-x_1)[/tex], where x and y are the coordinates of one point, and x1 and y1 are the coordinates of another point on the line. Because the chart represented for Sidewalk 2 includes a point, namely [tex](1, 20)[/tex] and [tex](3, 26)[/tex], we can plug this in and solve for the slope:

[tex]26-20=m(3-1)[/tex]

This is it in point-slope form. Because the second part of the question asks us to convert to slope-intercept form, we must solve for the slope, or m.

Expanding, we have [tex]26-20=3m-m[/tex]

Combining like terms, we have [tex]6 = 2m[/tex], and then [tex]3 = m[/tex]. Now, we need to plug a point and the slope back into point-slope form, not needing another point. We choose [tex](1, 20)[/tex], even though [tex](3, 26)[/tex] works just as well.

[tex]y-20=3(x-1)[/tex]

Expanding, we have [tex]y-20=3x-3[/tex]

Adding 20 to both sides, we have [tex]y=3x+17[/tex]

Part c. and d.

We see that both equations do not have the same slope, so then they are not parallel, meaning they don't have no solutions. If they have a solution, we can set them equal to each other.

[tex]3x+17=6x+5[/tex]

Subtracting 3x, we have [tex]17=3x+5[/tex]

Subtracting 5, we have [tex]12 = 3x[/tex]

Dividing by 3, we have [tex]x = 4[/tex].

Because there is no x = x, or anything like that, the solution does not have infinite solutions and therefore has one solution, meaning it is consistent independent.

[tex](\stackrel{x_1}{4}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{-1})\qquad \qquad m = -3 \\\\\\ \begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} \textit{point-slope form}\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y-y_1=m(x-x_1) \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}\implies y-\stackrel{y_1}{(-1)}=\stackrel{m}{-3}(x-\stackrel{x_1}{4})\implies y+1=-3(x-4) \\\\\\ y+1=-3x+12\implies \stackrel{\textit{slope-intercept form}}{y=-3x+11}[/tex]

does it pass through the origin?  well, we could draw it, or we can just check that, the origin is at 0,0, or namely when x = 0, y = 0, let's see if that's true, let's make x = 0, let's see what we get for "y".

y = -3(0) + 11 => y = 11

woops, no dice, y ≠ 0, so nope, doesn't pass through the origin.

Answer:

The first one is incorrect

Step-by-step explanation:

|a| would still be less than b, because you are mirroring a on the other side of b.

The diagram shows where |a| would lie.

-Chetan K

Answer:

To find the mean you need to add all the given numbers and then divide that by how many numbers you added. In this case, the process would look like this.

1. add all numbers

46+37+34+31+29+24 = 201

2. divide the sum (201) by the amount of numbers you added (6)

201/6 = 33.5

3. and you're done! the mean (which is basically the average) of the given numbers is 33.5

Answer:

1/15

Step-by-step explanation:

4/60

Divide the top and bottom by 4

4/4 =1

60/4= 15

1/15

Answer:

no solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

-2+1=2+5

-1=7

-1 does not equal 7 so there are no solutions