Suppose that the current spot exchange rate is 1.50/E and the one-year forward exchange rate is 1.60/E. The one-year interest rate is 5.4 percent in euros and 5.2 percent in pounds. You can borrow at most 1,000,000 or the equivalent pound amount, that is, £666,667, at the current spot exchange rate. a. Show how you can realize a guaranteed profit from covered interest arbitrage. Assume that you are a euro-based investor. Also determine the size of the arbi- trage profit. b. Discuss how the interest rate parity may be restored as a result of the above transactions. c. Suppose you are a pound-based investor. Show the covered arbitrage process and determine the pound profit amount.

Likely, Steiner wins. The main issue is whether Mobil's letter guaranteeing the discount is legally binding. The rule is promissory estoppel.

In this case, the main issue is whether Mobil is allowed to revoke the competitive allowance during the contract, despite having initially guaranteed it for the duration of the ten-year period. Steiner objected to Mobil's standard contract offer, which included a clause allowing for the allowance to be revoked at any time. Mobil then sent a letter to Steiner guaranteeing the allowance for the life of the contract, but this letter was later left out of the final contract. Mobil then revoked the allowance, which led to Steiner suing to maintain the discount.

The rule that would apply here is the doctrine of promissory estoppel. This legal principle prevents a party from reneging on a promise if the other party relied on it to their detriment. In this case, Steiner relied on Mobil's guarantee of the competitive allowance in their decision to enter into the contract. Removing the allowance would cause Steiner financial harm, which is why they are objecting to its revocation. While Mobil may argue that the letter guaranteeing the allowance was not included in the final contract, this may not be enough to void the guarantee. Therefore, it is likely that Steiner would win this case.

To know more about rules, here

brainly.com/question/30117847

#SPJ4

The expected standard deviation of stock A's returns, based on the information presented in the table, is approximately 0.2780. To calculate the expected standard deviation of stock A's returns, we need the missing probability for the "Bad" outcome.

Since the sum of probabilities should equal 1, we can calculate the missing probability by subtracting the sum of the probabilities of the other outcomes from 1. The probability for the "Bad" outcome can be calculated as follows:

Probability of Bad outcome = 1 - (Probability of Good outcome + Probability of Medium outcome)

Probability of Bad outcome = 1 - (0.2 + 0.5) = 1 - 0.7 = 0.3

Now that we have all the probabilities and corresponding stock returns, we can calculate the expected return and the standard deviation.

The expected return is calculated as follows:

Expected Return = (Probability of Good outcome * Stock A return in Good outcome) + (Probability of Medium outcome * Stock A return in Medium outcome) + (Probability of Bad outcome * Stock A return in Bad outcome)

Expected Return = (0.2 * 0.7) + (0.5 * 0.1) + (0.3 * -0.2) = 0.14 + 0.05 - 0.06 = 0.13

The expected standard deviation is calculated as follows:

Expected Standard Deviation = √((Probability of Good outcome * (Stock A return in Good outcome - Expected Return)^2) + (Probability of Medium outcome * (Stock A return in Medium outcome - Expected Return)^2) + (Probability of Bad outcome * (Stock A return in Bad outcome - Expected Return)^2))

Expected Standard Deviation = √((0.2 * (0.7 - 0.13)^2) + (0.5 * (0.1 - 0.13)^2) + (0.3 * (-0.2 - 0.13)^2))

Expected Standard Deviation = √((0.2 * 0.47^2) + (0.5 * -0.03^2) + (0.3 * -0.33^2))

Expected Standard Deviation = √(0.04418 + 0.00045 + 0.03267)

Expected Standard Deviation = √0.0773

Expected Standard Deviation ≈ 0.2780

Learn more about Standard Deviation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29758680

#SPJ11

When decision-makers face incentives that make it difficult to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes, we say they are in a prisoner's dilemma.

A detailed answer to this question would explain that the prisoner's dilemma is a game theory concept that illustrates a situation where two individuals, or groups, must make a decision that affects both parties. In this scenario, each decision-maker has the choice to cooperate with the other or act in their own self-interest.

The dilemma arises when the outcome that benefits both parties is dependent on both decision-makers choosing to cooperate, but the incentive to act in self-interest often outweighs the incentive to cooperate. As a result, the outcome often ends up being one where both parties lose or do not achieve the best possible outcome.

The term "prisoner's dilemma" comes from the hypothetical scenario where two prisoners are given the option to confess to a crime or stay silent, with the outcome of their decision affecting the other's sentence. A long answer to this question could provide additional examples of prisoner's dilemmas in different contexts and industries, as well as strategies for overcoming the dilemma and achieving mutually beneficial outcomes.

Learn more about dilemma

https://brainly.com/question/27311956

#SPJ11

Mr. Davidson's requirement to repay the loan for the development of the waterpark in his hometown in Florida will not be affected by the economic downturn caused by the automobile manufacturer's decision to locate elsewhere.

This is because loans are legal contracts that are binding and must be repaid regardless of any unforeseen circumstances that may arise during the course of the loan. The loan agreement likely includes provisions for default and late payments, and Mr. Davidson may face financial penalties or even legal action if he is unable to repay the loan on time. Mr. Davidson may be able to negotiate with the lender to restructure the loan terms to better suit his financial situation in light of the economic downturn. For example, he may be able to negotiate a longer repayment period, lower interest rates, or smaller monthly payments. It is important for Mr. Davidson to communicate openly with the lender and provide a clear explanation of the economic situation in his community.

To know more about economic downturn

https://brainly.com/question/30507607

#SPJ11

The famous economist who said, "there are no solutions, only trade-offs" is named Thomas Sowell. He is a renowned economist, social theorist, and senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.

Sowell's quote emphasizes the fact that in economics, there are always trade-offs between different options. Whenever we make a decision, we are essentially choosing one set of benefits and costs over another. For example, a government may choose to increase spending on education, but this may come at the expense of reducing spending on healthcare.

Similarly, businesses may choose to invest in research and development, but this may come at the expense of reducing profits in the short term.

Sowell's quote reminds us that there are no easy answers in economics and that every decision involves weighing up different trade-offs to determine the best course of action.

To know more about trade-offs click here:

https://brainly.com/question/10895386

#SPJ11

Milton Friedman, a famous economist, is known for saying that there are no solutions, only trade-offs.

The famous economist who said, 'there are no solutions, only trade-offs' was Milton Friedman. He was a prominent figure in the field of economics and is known for his contributions to classical liberal economics. Friedman believed that in many economic situations, individuals and societies have to make choices that involve trade-offs.

https://brainly.com/question/31804055

#SPJ12

Question 1: The cumulative cash flow becomes positive in year 4. Therefore, the payback period of the project is 4 years.

Question 2: We input the cash flows and solve for IRR, which is 22.3%. Therefore, the IRR of this project is 22.3%.

Question 3: The NPV is positive, this project is profitable and should be accepted.

Question 1: The payback period is the length of time it takes to recover the initial investment of a project. To find the payback period of this project, we need to calculate the cumulative cash flows and see in which year they become positive.

Starting from year 0 with an initial investment of -$24,450, we add the cash inflows of each year to the previous year's cumulative cash flow.

Year 0: -$24,450

Year 1: -$24,450 + $7,100 = -$17,350

Year 2: -$17,350 + $8,200 = -$9,150

Year 3: -$9,150 + $7,150 = -$2,000

Year 4: -$2,000 + $7,750 = $5,750

Year 5: $5,750 + $6,700 = $12,450

Question 2: The internal rate of return (IRR) is the discount rate that makes the net present value (NPV) of a project equal to zero. In other words, it is the rate at which the project's cash inflows equal its cash outflows. To find the IRR of this project, we can use trial and error or a financial calculator or software.

Question 3: The net present value (NPV) of a project is the sum of the present values of its cash inflows and outflows, discounted at the project's required rate of return. A positive NPV indicates that the project is profitable, while a negative NPV indicates that it is not. To find the NPV of this project, we can use the following formula:

Plugging in the numbers, we get:

NPV = -$34,070 + ($12,810 / (1 + 0.087)^1) + ($14,740 / (1 + 0.087)^2) + ($20,220 / (1 + 0.087)^3) + ($11,480 / (1 + 0.087)^4)

NPV = $2,174.69

To know more about IRR here

https://brainly.com/question/31319948

#SPJ4

If Pascal will break even at this level of sales, what are the fixed costs c) $900,000.

To calculate the fixed costs, we can use the break-even formula: Fixed Costs = (Sales - Variable Costs) / Contribution Margin Ratio.

Given that Pascal plans to sell 900,000 units at $1.50 per unit and the contribution margin ratio is 20% (or 0.20), we can calculate the fixed costs as follows:

Fixed Costs = (900,000 units * $1.50 per unit - (900,000 units * $1.50 per unit * 0.20)) / 0.20

Fixed Costs = ($1,350,000 - $270,000) / 0.20

Fixed Costs = $1,080,000 / 0.20

Fixed Costs = $900,000

Therefore, the fixed costs for Pascal, Inc. at the break-even point are $900,000.

Learn more about fixed costs here: brainly.com/question/30057573

#SPJ11

The phenomenon of grocery shoppers making more unplanned purchases when they are hungry than when they are full can be attributed to a few factors. Firstly, hunger can increase impulsivity and decrease self-control, which can lead to consumers making more impulsive and unplanned purchases.

This is supported by research that shows that hunger can increase activity in the brain's reward center, making food and other potential purchases more appealing.
Another explanation for this phenomenon is that consumers often make predictions based on their current emotional state, without taking into account other factors.

This can lead to overestimating the enjoyment or satisfaction of a purchase and underestimating the potential consequences, such as the impact on their budget or their health.

This is known as affective forecasting and can be influenced by hunger, as well as other emotional states such as stress or excitement.

However, it is important to note that this does not mean that all grocery shoppers are too emotional or incapable of making rational decisions.

Rather, it highlights the complex interplay between emotions, cognitive processes, and external factors such as hunger and the shopping environment.

Rational decisions are still possible but may require more effort and awareness of these influences.

Know more about unplanned purchases here:

https://brainly.com/question/30160342

#SPJ11

The Mediation is often used in situations where the parties want to preserve their relationship or maintain control over the outcome of the conflict resolution process.

The type of third party conflict resolution that gives the third party high levels of process control but low levels of decision control is mediation. Mediation is a process where a neutral third party facilitates communication and negotiation between two or more conflicting parties. The mediator helps the parties to identify the issues, explore options for resolving the conflict, and reach a mutually acceptable agreement. The mediator does not make decisions for the parties but instead guides them towards finding their own solutions. Thus, the mediator has a high level of process control because they control the structure and direction of the mediation process, but they have low levels of decision control because the parties make the final decisions about the outcome of the mediation.

For more questions on Mediation

https://brainly.com/question/30048830

#SPJ11

A. Mediation. According to the textbook, mediation gives the third party high levels of process control but low levels of decision control.

Mediation involves a third party who helps the disputants to negotiate a mutually acceptable solution to their conflict. The mediator controls the process by setting the agenda, managing the communication, and helping the parties to generate options for resolution. However, the mediator does not make the decision for the parties; instead, the parties retain control over the outcome of the mediation. Thus, mediation is a type of third-party conflict resolution that provides the third party with high levels of process control but low levels of decision control.

Learn more about Mediation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30160384

#SPJ11

The producer surplus is zero, the consumer surplus is $22,800. In a perfectly competitive market, the price is set at the point where supply equals demand, or where MC=AC=P. Using the given information, we can set MC=AC=50, and solve for the quantity:

MC = AC = P
50 = 240 - Q
Q = 190

Therefore, the quantity in a perfectly competitive market is 190. To find the price, we can plug Q back into the demand equation:

Q = 240 - P
190 = 240 - P
P = 50

Therefore, the price in a perfectly competitive market is $50.

To calculate the producer surplus, we need to find the area above the supply curve (which is just the cost function, C(qi)) and below the market price:

Producer Surplus = (Price - MC) x Quantity
= (50 - 50) x 190
= $0

Since the cost of producing each unit is exactly equal to the market price, the producer surplus is zero.

To calculate the consumer surplus, we need to find the area below the demand curve and above the market price:

Consumer Surplus = (Pmax - Price) x Quantity / 2
= (240 - 50) x 190 / 2
= $22,800

Finally, to calculate the total surplus, we add the producer and consumer surpluses:

Total Surplus = Producer Surplus + Consumer Surplus
= $0 + $22,800
= $22,800

Therefore, the producer surplus is zero, the consumer surplus is $22,800, and the total surplus is $22,800 in a perfectly competitive market with the given information.

To know more about Consumer Surplus visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29566756

#SPJ11

No, if the demand for two products has the same standard deviation, it does not necessarily mean they show the same uncertainty in demand.

While standard deviation is a measure of variability or dispersion in a dataset, it doesn't provide the complete picture of uncertainty. Uncertainty in demand can also be influenced by other factors such as market conditions, consumer preferences, and industry trends. To assess the overall uncertainty in demand, it's important to consider these additional factors and any underlying patterns that may affect the products differently. In summary, although the same standard deviation suggests that both products have a similar level of variability in demand, it is not sufficient to conclude that they have the same level of uncertainty in demand. It's crucial to examine other influencing factors to get a more accurate understanding of the uncertainty associated with each product.

To learn more about products, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28985255

#SPJ11

a. If the bonds were issued at par, their issue price would have been the same as their face value. b. To record the bond issuance in this instance, EWO Enterprises will debit cash for $189,000 and credit bonds payable for $189,000 in the ledger.

c. Record in journal:

Debit: $189,000. Cash

Credit: $189,000 Bonds Payable

b. If the bonds were issued at 104.5, this indicates that their issue price was greater than their face value. It is referred to as a bond premium. The premium lowers the effective interest rate and is amortised over the bonds' lifespan. EWO Enterprises will debit cash in the amount of $197,805 (i.e., $189,000 multiplied by 104.5%) and credit bonds payable in the amount of $189,000. The $8,805 discrepancy will be noted as a premium on the bonds payable account.

Record in journal:

Debit: $197,805 in cash

Credit: $189,000 Bonds Payable

Credit: $8,805 in Bond Premiums Due

c. If the bonds were issued at a price of 99, their issue price was less than their face value. Bond discounts are what this is. The discount raises the effective interest rate and is amortised over the bonds' lifespan. EWO Enterprises will debit cash in this instance for $187,110 ($189,000 multiplied by 99%) and credit bonds payable in this instance for $189,000. The $1,890 discrepancy will be noted as a markdown on the bonds payable account.

Record in journal:

Credit: Bonds Payable $189,000 Debit: Cash $187,110

Discount on Bonds Payable, $1,890, debit

In conclusion, whether or not the bonds were issued at par determines the journal entry to be made to document the issuance of long-term debt.

For more such question on bond

https://brainly.com/question/25965295

#SPJ11

a. When the bonds are issued at par, the journal entry to record the issuance is as follows:

Cash (or Bonds Payable) $189,000

Bonds Payable (or Cash) $189,000

b. When the bonds are issued at a premium, the journal entry to record the issuance is as follows:

Cash $197,805

Bonds Payable $189,000

Premium on Bonds Payable $8,805

c. When the bonds are issued at a discount, the journal entry to record the issuance is as follows:

Cash (or Bonds Payable) $186,090

Discount on Bonds Payable $2,910

Bonds Payable $189,000

Note: The Discount on Bonds Payable account is a contra-liability account, and it is presented as a deduction from the face value of the Bonds Payable in the balance sheet.

Learn more about Bonds Payable here:

https://brainly.com/question/30638118

#SPJ11

The fact that the bond is administered by an independent trustee is a significant aspect of its structure. An independent trustee is a third party that is responsible for overseeing and managing the bond, ensuring that the issuer complies with the terms of the bond agreement.

As for the information included in the bond, it is likely that the trustee will be responsible for ensuring that all relevant details are provided. This could include information on the amount of the bond, the interest rate, the maturity date, and the terms of repayment. Additionally, the trustee will likely ensure that the bond is properly pledged, meaning that there is adequate collateral backing the bond.

Overall, the use of an independent trustee is a common practice in the world of finance, and it provides an additional layer of protection for investors. By ensuring that the bond is properly administered and all relevant details are provided, the trustee helps to mitigate the risks associated with investing in bonds.

To know more about Trustee visit :

https://brainly.com/question/13084029

#SPJ11

The depreciation expense the company should recognize on December 32, Year 1 is option C 1200.

To determine the depreciation expense for the delivery van on December 31, Year 1, using the straight-line method, please follow these steps:

1. Calculate the total depreciable amount by subtracting the salvage value from the purchase price: $17,000 - $2,600 = $14,400.

2. Divide the total depreciable amount by the estimated useful life of the van to find the annual depreciation expense: $14,400 / 4 years = $3,600 per year.

3. Since the van was purchased on September 1, Year 1, and we need the depreciation expense until December 31, Year 1, calculate the proportion of the year that has passed:

4 months (September to December) / 12 months in a year = 1/3.

4. Multiply the annual depreciation expense by the proportion of the year that has passed: $3,600 * 1/3 = $1,200.

The company should recognize a depreciation expense of $1,200 on December 31, Year 1 using the straight-line method.

Learn more about salvage value here: https://brainly.com/question/30883708

#SPJ11

The alteration of economic or financial fundamentals that are thought to be drivers of capital to flow in and out of specific currencies D) Capital Controls

Capital controls refer to the alteration of economic or financial fundamentals that are believed to influence the flow of capital into and out of specific currencies.

Capital controls are measures implemented by governments or central banks to regulate the movement of capital in and out of a country. These measures can include restrictions on currency conversion, limits on foreign investment, taxes or tariffs on capital flows, and other regulatory policies.

The controls can discourage or encourage capital inflows and outflows based on the desired economic objectives.

Learn more about Capital controls here: brainly.com/question/10387893

#SPJ11

The type of loan you are referring to is called Exporter's Credit. It is a type of loan in which the exporter is covered, but the value of the cover will be less than the value of the contract.

An export credit agency (known in trade finance as an ECA) or investment insurance agency is a private or quasi-governmental institution that acts as an intermediary between national governments and exporters to issue export insurance solutions and guarantees for financing.
Supplier's Credit is a type of financing where an exporter extends credit to the importer for the purchase of goods and services. In this case, the exporter is covered, but the value of the cover may be less than the value of the contract. This arrangement allows the importer to pay for the goods or services over a period of time, rather than upfront.

Therefore, the correct answer is option B. Exporter's Credit.

Learn more about exporter credit here: https://brainly.com/question/13982524

#SPJ11

The marginal factor cost to the firm of hiring the 11th worker is the additional cost incurred by the firm when it hires that additional worker.

In this case, to hire the 11th worker, the firm needs to raise the wage for all workers from $15.00 to $16.00 per hour. Therefore, the marginal factor cost of hiring the 11th worker is the increase in wage cost for all 10 workers.
To calculate the marginal factor cost, we can subtract the total cost before hiring the 11th worker from the total cost after hiring the 11th worker.
Let's assume that each worker works for 40 hours per week and the firm operates for 52 weeks in a year.
Before hiring the 11th worker:
Total cost = 10 workers * $15.00 per hour * 40 hours per week * 52 weeks per year
After hiring the 11th worker:
Total cost = 11 workers * $16.00 per hour * 40 hours per week * 52 weeks per year
Marginal factor cost = Total cost after hiring the 11th worker - Total cost before hiring the 11th worker
Please note that this calculation assumes no other changes in factors of production or productivity.

To learn more about marginal factor
https://brainly.com/question/31421962
#SPJ11

Harvest Catering should recognize revenue from its catering service in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and the specific guidelines provided by the applicable accounting standards (such as the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Revenue Recognition Standard, ASC 606, for US-based companies).

Under ASC 606, revenue should generally be recognized when the following criteria are met:

1. Identification of the contract: Harvest Catering should have a contract or agreement in place with the customer for catering services. The contract should outline the rights and obligations of both parties.

2. Performance obligations: Harvest Catering should identify the specific performance obligations within the contract, which typically include providing the catering services as agreed upon, delivering the food, and potentially additional services such as setup or waitstaff.

3. Determination of transaction price: Harvest Catering needs to determine the transaction price for its catering services, which is usually the agreed-upon amount specified in the contract. If there are variable considerations or discounts, they should be taken into account when determining the transaction price.

4. Allocation of the transaction price: If the contract includes multiple performance obligations (e.g., catering services and additional services), Harvest Catering needs to allocate the transaction price to each obligation based on their relative standalone selling prices.

5. Satisfaction of performance obligations: Revenue should be recognized as the performance obligations are satisfied. In the case of catering services, this would generally be when the food is delivered or the event is completed as specified in the contract.

Learn more about revenue here: brainly.com/question/30245223

#SPJ11

The firm charging $112 in a perfectly competitive industry will not be able to sell its products because the equilibrium price is $100. In the long run, the firm will be forced to lower its price to $100 or exit the industry due to competition.

In a perfectly competitive industry, all firms are price takers, meaning they cannot influence the market price. The equilibrium price is determined by the intersection of the industry's supply and demand curves. If a firm charges a higher price than the equilibrium price, consumers will opt to purchase from other firms offering the same product at a lower price. As a result, the firm charging $112 will have no customers and will experience a decrease in demand.

In the long run, firms in a perfectly competitive industry can freely enter or exit the market. If the firm persists in charging $112, it will continue to face a lack of demand, leading to losses. In response, the firm will have two options: adjust its price to the equilibrium price of $100 or exit the industry altogether.

Lowering the price to $100 would allow the firm to compete on an equal footing with other firms in the industry. However, if the firm decides not to lower its price, it will likely suffer sustained losses, which are unsustainable in the long run. In this case, the firm may choose to exit the industry to avoid further financial difficulties.

Learn more about industry here: brainly.com/question/16680576

#SPJ11

The given statement "an example of common (random) variation in a production system may be that workers are not identically trained" is TRUE because this variation can affect the output of the production system, but it is expected and can be managed through statistical process control techniques.

Common (random) variation in a production system refers to the normal, inherent fluctuations in a process that occur over time.

One example of common variation is the difference in worker training levels. Since it is difficult to achieve identical training for every worker, variations in skill levels and expertise can lead to differences in production output and quality.

These fluctuations are considered random because they cannot be traced back to a specific cause, but are instead an inherent part of the production system. Properly managing these variations is crucial for maintaining a stable and efficient production process.

Learn more about random variation at https://brainly.com/question/31088366

#SPJ11

During the immediate market period, a producer may not have sufficient time to respond to a change in demand.

In the immediate market period, producers face a short-term constraint where they are unable to adjust their production levels quickly enough to accommodate sudden changes in demand. This is mainly due to the fixed nature of their production factors, such as machinery, labor, and raw materials.

Since production cannot be easily scaled up or down in this short time frame, producers may not be able to respond effectively to shifts in demand. As a result, they might experience temporary imbalances between supply and demand, leading to potential shortages or surpluses in the market.

To Know more about immediate market period,

brainly.com/question/14611464

#SPJ11

Dissaving in the current period refers to the situation where individuals are spending more money than they are earning. This can occur due to various reasons such as unforeseen expenses, a decrease in income, or poor financial planning. In order to fund dissaving, individuals have a few options to consider.

Firstly, borrowing from friends can be an option to fund dissaving. However, this option should be exercised with caution as it can potentially damage relationships and may not be a reliable source of funding in the long term.

Secondly, bank loans can be considered to fund dissaving. This option provides a reliable source of funding, but it comes with interest rates and repayment terms that need to be considered carefully before committing to borrowing.

Thirdly, previous savings can be used to fund dissaving. This option is the most financially responsible as it does not involve taking on additional debt. However, this is only possible if individuals have saved up money in the past and have not used up all their savings.

Lastly, current income earned can also be used to fund dissaving. Individuals can adjust their spending habits and cut back on discretionary expenses to free up more money for essential expenses.

In conclusion, the options to fund dissaving are (i), (ii), and (iii), and (iv), but the best course of action depends on each individual's financial situation and goals. It is important to carefully consider the implications of each option before making a decision.

To know more about Dissaving in the current period click this link -

brainly.com/question/29598559

#SPJ11

A strategy to be the industry's overall low-cost provider may not be particularly well-matched to the market situation when buyers have widely varying needs and special requirements, and the prices of substitute products are relatively high.

This is because, in such a situation, buyers are willing to pay a premium for products that meet their specific needs and requirements. Therefore, a low-cost provider may not be able to differentiate its offerings from its rivals and may not be able to capture a significant share of the market. In addition, if there are only a few, large-volume buyers in the industry, they may have significant bargaining power and may demand customized solutions that a low-cost provider may not be able to provide. In such a scenario, it may be more effective for a company to focus on product differentiation and offering unique value propositions that appeal to specific segments of the market.

To know more about low-cost

https://brainly.com/question/29988266

#SPJ11

The mortgage REITs provide investors with extraordinary dividend yields and borrowed funds to invest in higher-yielding mortgage assets.

These policies come with inherent risks and the interest rate fluctuations can impact profitability, credit and prepayment risks expose mortgage REITs to potential defaults and disruptions in cash flows.

On the other hand, the liquidity and market risks can affect their ability to meet obligations and navigate changing market conditions.

Therefore, the investors should carefully evaluate the risk factors and consider their investment objectives before venturing into Mortgage REITs.

To know more about mortgage REITs here,

https://brainly.com/question/31851283

#SPJ4

True. AWS' S3 is considered one of the most reliable and flexible storage solutions in the market.

It offers a wide range of features and capabilities that make it stand out from its competitors. One of its strengths is its ability to provide high availability and durability, making it an ideal choice for frequently accessed data. With S3, users can store and retrieve data easily, with low latency and high throughput. Moreover, S3 provides a variety of storage classes, including standard, infrequent access, and Glacier, each tailored to specific use cases and cost considerations. All these features and capabilities make S3 a preferred storage solution for many organizations, and its competitors are finding it hard to match its performance and flexibility. In summary, AWS' S3 beats its competitors in most storage aspects, including for frequently accessed data.

To know more about AWS' S3  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31517206

#SPJ11

Bramble Corp. received $228400 from the sale of the machinery.

Depreciation is the process of allocating the cost of an asset over its useful life. It is an important accounting concept that allows companies to expense the cost of an asset over time and match it with the revenue generated by the asset. In this context,

Bramble Corp. purchased machinery for $920000 on January 1, 2017, with a useful life of 5 years and a salvage value of $59500. Straight-line depreciation has been recorded, meaning that the same amount of depreciation expense is recorded each year. Therefore, the annual depreciation expense is calculated as follows:

Depreciation Expense = (Cost - Salvage Value) / Useful Life

Depreciation Expense = ($920000 - $59500) / 5

Depreciation Expense = $172900 per year

Now, we need to determine the accumulated depreciation as of May 1, 2021, the date of sale. Since the machinery was purchased on January 1, 2017, the company recorded 4 years of depreciation expense by May 1, 2021.

Accumulated Depreciation = Depreciation Expense x Number of Years

Accumulated Depreciation = $172900 x 4

Accumulated Depreciation = $691600

Therefore, the carrying value of the machinery as of May 1, 2021 is calculated as follows:

Carrying Value = Cost - Accumulated Depreciation - Gain or Loss on Sale

Carrying Value = $920000 - $691600 - $13000

Carrying Value = $215400

The gain on sale is calculated as follows:

Gain on Sale = Selling Price - Carrying Value

Gain on Sale = Selling Price - ($920000 - $691600)

Gain on Sale = Selling Price - $228400

We know that the gain on sale is $13000, so we can solve for the selling price:

Selling Price = Gain on Sale + Carrying Value

Selling Price = $13000 + $215400

Selling Price = $228400

Therefore, Bramble Corp. received $228400 from the sale of the machinery.

To know more about Depreciation here

https://brainly.com/question/14682335

#SPJ4

The given statement, "The total economic impact and growth of the beer market is estimated to be 2.0 percent of the total US GDP," is false because there is no specific percentage that universally represents the economic impact and growth of the beer market.

The contribution of the beer market to the overall GDP can vary depending on multiple factors such as market conditions, consumer preferences, and economic trends.

While the beer industry does make a significant contribution to the US economy, the specific percentage cannot be accurately determined without up-to-date data and comprehensive analysis. Therefore, it is incorrect to claim a fixed 2.0 percent figure without proper evidence and research.

For more questions like GDP click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30111703

#SPJ11

San Marcos Division's residual income for the most recent year was $2,180,000.

To calculate the San Marcos Division's residual income, we first need to calculate its operating income. Operating income is calculated by subtracting expenses from sales, which gives us $2,500,000 ($10,000,000 - $7,500,000).
Next, we need to calculate the division's invested capital. Invested capital is calculated by subtracting total assets at the beginning of the year from total assets at the end of the year, which gives us $2,000,000 ($7,000,000 - $5,000,000). Now, we can calculate the San Marcos Division's residual income. Residual income is calculated by subtracting the division's required rate of return from its operating income, and then multiplying that difference by its invested capital. The required rate of return for all divisions is 16%, which is the same as the target rate of return. So, we can calculate the residual income as follows:
Residual income = ($2,500,000 - (0.16 x $2,000,000))
Residual income = $2,500,000 - $320,000
Residual income = $2,180,000
Residual income is a financial performance metric that measures the profitability of an organization's assets. It is a measure of how much money an organization has earned above and beyond its minimum required rate of return. This is important because it helps an organization understand whether its divisions are performing at a level that justifies their investment. In this case, the Atlanta Company has set a target rate of return of 16% for all divisions. The San Marcos Division generated sales of $10,000,000 and expenses of $7,500,000 in the most recent year. The division had total assets of $5,000,000 at the beginning of the year and $7,000,000 at the end of the year.
Using the formula for residual income, we calculated the San Marcos Division's residual income to be $2,180,000. This means that the division generated $2,180,000 in income above and beyond the 16% target rate of return.
This information is important for the Atlanta Company because it helps them determine whether they are investing in the right areas. If a division's residual income is consistently below the target rate of return, it may be an indication that the division is not performing as well as it should be. In contrast, if a division's residual income consistently exceeds the target rate of return, it may be an indication that the division is performing very well and may be a good area for the company to invest in further.

To learn more about Atlanta visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28165259

#SPJ11

The account types that carry a normal credit balance are revenue accounts, liability accounts, owner's equity accounts, income accounts, and gains accounts.

The account types that carry a normal credit balance are:

1. Revenue Accounts: Revenue accounts include all sources of income for a business, such as sales revenue, service revenue, and interest revenue.

2. Liability Accounts: Liability accounts represent obligations or debts owed by a business, such as accounts payable, loans payable, and accrued expenses.

3. Owner's Equity Accounts: Owner's equity accounts represent the owner's share of the business's assets after deducting liabilities. This includes accounts such as owner's capital, retained earnings, and drawings.

4. Income Accounts: Income accounts track non-operating income, such as interest income, rental income, or gains from the sale of assets.

5. Gains Accounts: Gains accounts are used to record gains resulting from non-operating activities, such as the sale of assets at a higher price than their book value.

Please note that the classification of account types and their normal balances may vary depending on the accounting framework or standards followed by an organization.

Learn more about: credit

brainly.com/question/10826308

#SPJ11

The average collection period in 2013 was  46 days. Option A) is correct .

To calculate the average collection period in 2013 for Leggett & Platt, Inc., you need to follow these steps:

1. Calculate the average accounts receivable by adding the accounts receivable at the beginning and end of the year, then dividing by 2. In this case, it would be ($482.6 million + $465.4 million) / 2 = $474 million.

2. Calculate the daily net sales by dividing the net sales by the number of days in a year (assume 365 days). For this example, it would be $3,746 million / 365 days = $10.26 million per day.

3. Calculate the average collection period by dividing the average accounts receivable by the daily net sales. In this case, it would be $474 million / $10.26 million per day = 46.2 days.

However, Based on these calculations, the average collection period in 2013 for Leggett & Platt, Inc. was approximately 46 days. Therefore, the correct  answer is A) 46 days.

To know more about Collection period refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/16008873

#SPJ11