Answers
Answer:
China & Japan.
Explanation:
Beginning with the Chinese Exclusion Act (passed by law in 1882), the exclusion laws prohibited Chinese immigrants to not be allowed in the U.S.
Another immigration act in 1924, excluded all Asian immigrants including from Japan.
Related Questions
A gas station has been robbed. The crime scene investigators arrived at the crime scene with forensic lamps to seek latent fingerprints of the perpetrator. Which technique will they use to find latent fingerprints?
Answers
Answer:
Fluorescent lights and dyes
Explanation:
Fluorescent lights and fluorescent dyes are used to find any traces of Latent Fingerprints
Create a detect examination
Answers
Answer:
Choose appropriate item types for your objectives. ...Highlight how the exam aligns with course objectives. ...Write instructions that are clear, explicit, and unambiguous. ...Write instructions that preview the exam. ...Word questions clearly and simply. ...Enlist a colleague or TA to read through your exam.After how many years does a Utah driver's license expire?
Answers
Answer: typically 5
Explanation:
When passing a bicyclist, many states have a law that says that the bicyclist must be given how much space A. 6 feet B. 4 feet C. 5 feet D. 3 feet E. none of the above
Answers
The bare minimum safe passing distance at slow speeds is three feet from the widest point of both cars. The 3 feet rule is still in effect even if the bicyclist is riding along the edge of the bicycle lane close to the traffic lane.
3 feet or more is regarded as a safe passing distance when a motor vehicle overtakes and passes a bicycle. Until the motor vehicle is safely past the overtaking bicycle, pass with a safe distance between the two vehicles of at least three feet.
Avoid passing or overtaking a cyclist too closely. According to California law, there must be a three-foot minimum space between any motor vehicle part and any part of a bicycle or its rider.
To learn more about bicyclist, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30742805
#SPJ1
what are Dalit&what do they do
Answers
Answer:
Dalit dalita meaning "broken/scattered", Hindi: romanized: dalit, same meaning) is a name for people belonging to the lowest caste in India, characterised as "untouchable".[1] Dalits were excluded from the four-fold varna system of Hinduism and were seen as forming a fifth varna, also known by the name of Panchama. Dalits now profess various religious beliefs, including Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Christianity, Islam and various other belief systems.
Explanation:
correct me if im wrong
Answer:
Untouchable, also called Dalit, officially Scheduled Caste, formerly Harijan, in traditional Indian society, the former name for any member of a wide range of low-caste Hindu groups and any person outside the caste system.
Dalits in India continue to work as sanitation workers: manual scavengers, cleaners of drains, garbage collectors, and sweepers of roads.
describe the relevance of justice in Nepali society and nepalis legal system
Answers
Nepal's criminal justice system is based on an adversarial system. The adversarial system was a type of criminal justice system in which the court acts as a mediator between the prosecution as well as the defence. The Court only hears the case as well as renders its decision in accordance with applicable laws and precedent.
Nepal's judicial system believes in an independent, impartial, as well as competent judiciary, as well as the concept of the rule of law, in order to establish a prosperous country. An independent judiciary, conceived by the executive branch of Nepal's government.
Nepal's judicial system evolved from its own judicial system, customs, and practises, and it has distinct characteristics. Doctrinally, it is a hybrid of judicial systems used in common and Roman law throughout the world.
Learn more about Nepal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14386793
#SPJ1
If you have a credit card, it's good to spend more money than you have in the bank.
TRUE OR FALSE
Edpuzzle
Answers
You have to pay back all the $ you spend
Which of the following might be a factor in judging distance accurately for some people?
Answers
Answer:
The time taken to reach a certain destination may be one of the factors used in judging distances accurately for some people. The speed taken to reach a destination is another factor.
Explanation:
:D
Which statement most likely comes from a voter who is informed?
Answers
Answer:
A) "I know who is running for the Senate in my state."
Explanation:
An informed voter is one who chooses a political applicant based on the candidate's tactics rather than how one simply feels about the candidate. However, other political scientists see party description as a cognitive heuristic or bypass to discovering who is the best candidate. They view this heuristic as a judicious framework from which to take a candidate since it will be a close conjecture to where one stands on the plans.THANKS
Who was the first law given to? *
-The Egyptians
-The Hebrews
-The Greeks
-The Romans
Quickly please I’m in a testtt
Answers
Answer:
The content of the instructions and its interpretations, the Oral Torah, was passed down orally, excerpted and codified in Rabbinical Judaism, and in the Talmud were numbered as the 613 commandments. The Law given to Moses at Sinai (Hebrew Halakhah le-Moshe mi-Sinai הלכה למשה מסיני) is a halakhic distinction.
Explanation:
so i guess the hebrews
match each description to the correct group or branch of government in Oklahoma.
Leadership elected in non-presidential election years
made up of two different chambers
can vote on a referendum
executive branch
legislative branch
citizens
Answers
Answer:
Executive Branch ⇒ Leadership elected in non-presidential election years.
In Oklahoma, the Governor, who is the leader of the Executive branch, is elected in a non-presidential election year with the last elections being in 2018.
Legislative Branch ⇒ Made up of two different chambers.
Like Congress, Oklahoma has a bicameral legislature therefore there are two chambers which are the Oklahoma House of Representatives and Oklahoma Senate.
Citizens ⇒ Can vote on a referendum.
Citizens of Oklahoma are the bedrock of democracy in the state and so can vote in referendums to determine changes to fix issues concerning the state.
Five (5) nanograms of THC per millimeter of blood results in a marijuana related DUI charge and below five (5) nanograms can result in a DWAI charge A. False - it has to be ten (10) nanograms or higher B. False - it has to be at minimum of fifteen (15) nanograms or higher C. False - there is no accurate way to measure THC in a person's blood D. True E. none of the above
Answers
The legal limit for Delta 9- Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, was set at 5 nanograms per milliliter of blood to identify drivers who are impaired.
A marijuana-related DUI charge results from five nanograms or more, and a DWAI charge from less than five nanograms.
The Washington State Initiative-502 set a per se limit of 5 ng/mL of delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in whole blood for driving under the influence (DUI) to address cannabis-impaired driving.
Five nanograms or more of active Delta 9 THC per milliliter of whole blood in a driver's bloodstream constitutes a "permissible inference" in Colorado that the person is under the influence of cannabis.
To learn more about Tetrahydrocannabinol, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30985580
#SPJ1
The starting pay for an FBI special agent following graduation from the training academy ranges from $53,743 to $58,335 per year, depending on where the agent is assigned. This salary is approximately the same as the average salary of
Answers
This salary is approximately the same as the average salary of B) A high school teacher in the United States
Why is the pay comparable?According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the typical income earned by high school teachers in the United States is approximately $61,660 a year at the median. This aligns closely with the salary bracket awarded to an FBI Special Agent upon completion of training at the academy.
It should be acknowledged that the amount of earnings for teachers can differ greatly depending on the state and district they work in, causing some to receive much higher or lower compensation.
Read more about salaries here:
https://brainly.com/question/29803819
#SPJ1
The starting pay for an FBI special agent following graduation from the training academy ranges from $53,743 to $58,335 per year, depending on where the agent is assigned. This salary is approximately the same as the average salary of
A) A software engineer in a large tech firm
B) A high school teacher in the United States
C) A corporate lawyer at a major law firm
D) An entry-level nurse in a city hospital
Compare the Bill of Rights from our last unit with the International Human rights Law from
this unit, pick two rights that are in one but not the other and explain why you think this
happened.
Answers
When comparing the Bill of Rights, which refers to the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, with International Human Rights Law, represented primarily by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), there are indeed rights that are present in one but not the other. Two such examples are:
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms (in the Bill of Rights, specifically the Second Amendment): This right is not explicitly present in International Human Rights Law, as articulated in the UDHR. The reason for this omission can be attributed to the different historical, cultural, and legal contexts of the United States compared to the international community. The right to bear arms holds significant historical and constitutional significance in the United States due to its association with self-defense, the protection of individual liberties, and the historical context of the American Revolution.The Right to Asylum (in International Human Rights Law, specifically Article 14 of the UDHR): This right is not explicitly mentioned in the Bill of Rights. The absence of this right in the Bill of Rights can be attributed to the fact that the United States Constitution primarily focuses on the relationship between the government and its citizens, whereas the right to asylum relates to the treatment of individuals seeking refuge in a country due to fear of persecution in their home country. Asylum is a concept more closely associated with international law and human rights frameworks, addressing the rights and protections of individuals across borders.These differences highlight how legal documents and frameworks can reflect the unique historical, cultural, and legal contexts of a particular country, shaping the specific rights enshrined within them.For more such questions on Amendments
https://brainly.com/question/458137
#SPJ8
Why was Daniel Shay upset?
Answers
Answer:
He led a group of upset western Massachusetts residents who were upset about the way the state government was handling wartime debt and high taxes. In some cases, Army veterans who had never received pay for their service saw their property seized.
society bears the costs of alcohol related crashes
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Society bears the costs of alcohol-related crashes. The given statement is True. We can become more vulnerable to both minor and major mishaps, including slips and falls, drowning, poisoning, and other unintentional injuries, when we drink alcohol. In fact, unintentional injury accounts for just under one-third (29%) of all fatalities linked to alcohol.
Why does alcohol cause accidents?It can affect decision-making while driving as well as motor skills, perception, and attention. Driving while intoxicated makes it more likely that you'll cause an accident.
Alcohol abuse has negative effects on people's health, but it also has a negative social and economic impact on both individuals and society as a whole. Early in life, drinking alcohol results in death and impairment. 13.5% of all deaths among people 20 to 39 are thought to be related to alcohol.
Thus, the mentioned given above statement is correct.
Learn more about alcohol here:
https://brainly.com/question/16975086
#SPJ2
Which organization matches victims with lawyers who specialize in appealing cases
in higher courts?
the Innocence Project
the Center on Wrongful Convictions
Witness to Innocence
the Innocence Convention
Answers
Answer:the innocence project
Explanation:
The Innocence Project: organization matches victims with lawyers who specialize in appealing cases in higher courts. Thus, option A is the correct option.
The Innocence Project is a national litigation and public policy organization based at Yeshiva University's Cardozo School of Law that aims to clear the names of wrongfully imprisoned people using DNA testing and other scientific developments while also overhauling the criminal justice system to end future injustice.
The majority of the Innocence Project's work is concentrated on instances involving sexual assault or murder when DNA evidence (such as blood or other body fluids) is crucial to the case. 15% of all exonerations in the US are DNA exonerations, which is a small percentage.
Learn more about the Innocence Project here:
https://brainly.com/question/30372508
#SPJ1
Implied powers are those that:
Group of answer choices
) Are not necessarily stated in the Constitution but are recognized as being part of the power of the Presidency.
) Are not necessarily stated in the Constitution but are recognized as being part of the powers of Congress.
) Are used to help provide flexibility for those situations that might not have been written in the Constitution.
All of the above.
Answers
Implied powers are those that B) are not necessarily stated in the Constitution but are recognized as being part of the powers of Congress.
Implied powers are those that are not clearly defined in the Constitution but are seen to be inferred by the particular powers given to Congress. These powers originate from the so-called elastic Clause, sometimes known as the essential and proper Clause, which gives Congress the ability to enact whatever laws it deems appropriate and essential to carry out its defined duties.
It has also been held that Congress additionaly has an absolute authority to control actions that have an indirect impact on interstate commerce, which is a power that is specifically provided to Congress in the Constitution. A prime example of an implied power is this.
Read more about Implied powers on:
https://brainly.com/question/29615444
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Implied powers are those that:
Group of answer choices
A) Are not necessarily stated in the Constitution but are recognized as being part of the power of the Presidency.
B) Are not necessarily stated in the Constitution but are recognized as being part of the powers of Congress.
C) Are used to help provide flexibility for those situations that might not have been written in the Constitution.
D) All of the above.
A Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would
most likely agree with which statement?
The Supreme Court's most important role is to ensure that
Congress does not enact policies that discriminate against
people.
B. The Supreme Court should use its power to interpret U.S. laws to
better protect citizens from injustice and unfairness.
O C. The Supreme Court should issue only majority opinions and do
away with dissenting and concurring,opinions.
D. The Supreme Court's rulings should reflect the exact text of the
Constitution rather than justices own beliefs.
Answers
A Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would most likely agree with this statement: D. The Supreme Court's rulings should reflect the exact text of the Constitution rather than justices own beliefs.
Supreme Court is a federal court and it's known to be the highest court based on the hierarchy of courts in the judicial branch. Thus, Supreme Court is referred to as the ap-ex court.
Generally, the Supreme Court comprises nine (9) justices:
A chief justice.Eight (8) associate justices.Judicial restraint can be defined as a procedural or substantive approach to judicial interpretation and review which asserts that judges should hesitate in the exercise of their own power to strike down laws unless they are unconstitutional and illegitimate. Thus, a Supreme Court justice is expected to make decisions strictly based on the constitution or a landmark case.
In conclusion, a Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would most likely agree that, the rulings of the Supreme Court's should always reflect the exact text of the Constitution rather than their own beliefs.
Read more: https://brainly.com/question/10946441
When does a human right become a legal right?
Answers
when the human right have inspired states to enshrine such standards into national constitutions and other legislation
just need the writing doesn’t have to be that long +100 points and brainless
Answers
Answer:
to read karlo
Explanation:
need to writing
What are accounting concepts? Explain any 2 of them.
Answers
Can a country change its government? How?
Answers
Answer:
To tell the truth i really dont know but you a smart and can figure it out yo own self.
Explanation:
Y’all this is psyschology work. Need your help I’ll mark u as brainlist :)!
1. What is the differences between ‘resting tremors’ and ‘action tremors’?
Answers
Answer:
Rest tremors occur in a body part that is relaxed and completely supported against gravity. Action tremors occur with voluntary contraction of a muscle and can be further subdivided into postural, isometric, and kinetic tremors.
Explanation:
no more explane.
similarities between nazism fascism and totalitarianism (not less than 3)
Answers
Nazism, fascism, and totalitarianism are governments where the dictators have total control over the people and over the government.
What was the three prongs for the lemon test
Answers
Answer:
It must have a secular legislative purpose, its primary effect must neither advance nor inhibit religion, and it must not foster excessive government entanglement with religion
standard used determine whether an expert's scientific testimony is admissible
Answers
Answer:
aaaaaaaaa
Explanation:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Explanation:
mj ii Erik ekeieieo3eoo3o3oekrlorororororo
Regular yoga practice creates mental clarity and calmness; increases body awareness; relieves chronic stress patterns; relaxes the mind; centers attention; and sharpens concentration. Question 1 options: True False
Answers
It is a true statement that regular yoga practice creates mental clarity and calmness; increases body awareness; relieves chronic stress patterns; relaxes the mind; centers attention; and sharpens concentration
Does regular yoga practice provide mental clarity and calmness?The key advantages is the creation of mental clarity and calmness. Through the combination of physical postures, breathing techniques, and meditation, yoga helps to quiet the mind and reduce mental chatter.
It promotes a sense of inner peace and relaxation allowing individuals to let go of stress and anxiety. The mindful and focused nature of yoga also increases body awareness and helping practitioners develop a deeper connection with their physical selves.
Moreover, the practice of yoga can relieve chronic stress patterns because it encourages deep relaxation and activates the body's relaxation response.
Read more about yoga
brainly.com/question/23995369
#SPJ1
Why do you think some neighborhoods are more crime ridden than others? Do you think it is the people living there or something about the neighborhood? Why?
Answers
Answer:
Answer down below.
Explanation:
Yes, some neighborhoods can be more crime ridden, BUT, that does not mean that its only them. Crime can happen anywhere, and it doesn't have to be one specific place. Its not really about the people IN the neighborhood, but its with the people OUTSIDE. They come in and see there is something going on, and they go ahead and join. Not saying that all the people are innocent, but a vast majority are at times.
Why are there different sentences for different crimes? Why are there different sentences for the same crime?
Answers
The existence of different sentences for different crimes and variations in sentencing for the same crime can be attributed to several factors within the legal systems of different jurisdictions.
Why are there different sentences for different crimes, and different sentences for the same crime?Here are a few key reasons for these differences:
Crimes differ greatly in terms of their seriousness and effects on society. Different penalties are given for various offenses in legal systems in an effort to represent this variety. For instance, crimes like murder or armed robbery are typically seen as more serious and subject to harsher punishments than less serious crimes like petty theft or simple assault.Legislative discretion: Lawmakers have the power to adopt laws and amend them, including choosing the punishments for certain offences. Due to their discretion, legislators are able to weigh a variety of variables when determining punishments, including the potential harm that will be done, society norms and values, issues with public safety, and the necessity for deterrent or rehabilitation.Legal precedent and case-specific factors can also have an impact on how sentencing rules are applied. Legal precedents are established by earlier court rulings. The particulars of a case, such as the defendant's criminal history, purpose, level of involvement, mitigating or aggravating circumstances, and the discretion used by judges or juries, may result in different sentences.Learn more on crime sentence here https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1