The federal system outlined in the new constitution contained three branches, in which each branch has the power to restrain the other branches.
The United States Constitution, which was ratified in 1787, established a federal structure with three departments of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial. Each branch is intended to have distinct authority and accountability, as well as to function as a check and balance on the others.
Making legislation belongs to the legislative branch, usually known as Congress. The President is the leader of the executive branch, which is in charge of running the government's daily operations and executing the law. The Supreme Court and other federal courts make up the judicial branch, which is in charge of applying the law and preserving the Constitution.
Each branch has the authority to impose limitations on what the other branches can do. For instance, a veto from the president can be overridden by the legislative branch, laws approved by Congress can be vetoed by the executive branch, and laws can be declared illegal by the judicial department. This system of checks and balances guarantees that the government functions in a balanced and democratic way and prevents any one branch from becoming overly strong.
For more questions on federal system click on
https://brainly.com/question/985210
#SPJ4
What are some discussion questions on Freedom Writers?
Here are some discussion questions on Freedom Writers that you can use: What are some of the challenges that the students in Freedom Writers face How does Ms. Gruwell's teaching style differ from that of other teachers at Wilson High School?
Know more discussion questions on Freedom Writers that you can use: What role does writing play in the students' journey towards self-discovery and understanding of others? How do the students' relationships with each other and with Ms. Gruwell evolve throughout the film? What are some of the themes present in Freedom Writers and how are they explored? How does the film depict the impact of racism and discrimination on individuals and communities? What are some of the ways in which the students use their voices to create change? How does Freedom Writers portray the power of education and the importance of having a supportive and dedicated teacher?
Learn more about "Freedom Writers" here:
https://brainly.com/question/22057373
#SPJ11
What is the chemical and physical properties of shaving cream
Shaving cream is a mixture of chemicals and physical properties can vary depending on the specific formulation, but generally it is a foamy, semi-solid substance with a pH around 7.
Shaving cream is typically composed of a mixture of chemicals that help to create a foam when the cream is applied to the skin. These chemicals can include surfactants, emulsifiers, and thickeners.
The physical properties of shaving cream can vary depending on the specific formulation, but it is generally a foamy, semi-solid substance that is easy to spread over the skin. It is typically white or off-white in color and has a mild, pleasant scent.
Shaving cream has a pH around 7, which is considered neutral on the pH scale. This helps to ensure that the cream is gentle on the skin and does not cause irritation or inflammation.
In addition to its chemical and physical properties, shaving cream also has functional properties that make it useful for shaving. The foam helps to lubricate the skin and hair, making it easier to shave without causing irritation or razor burn.
Shaving cream can also help to soften the hair and make it easier to cut, resulting in a closer and smoother shave. Overall, the properties of shaving cream make it an essential component of a successful and comfortable shaving experience.
Learn more about "shaving cream" here:
https://brainly.com/question/26320290
#SPJ11
Describe your plan to help solve the issue you chose in
your claim. How will you create a change in your a
community?
Give your response in four to five sentences.
To improve the health of my community, I plan to launch a campaign encouraging children to ride their bikes to school. I'll enlist the assistance of a few of my friends, who will then enlist the assistance of their own friends to ride bikes together.
Our campaign might catch on and become popular before long. It will contribute to the formation of a broad movement that will improve the lives of many people.
Why is change important in the community?Social changes that allow people to grow can spur population growth. This expansion of society can lead to technological innovations, which can lead to even more social change. The industrial revolution is one example of this.
Positive social change benefits society by improving human and social conditions. Individuals, families and friends, communities, organizations, and local, state, or federal governments can all experience these changes. Ideas and actions with real-world consequences are the driving forces behind positive social change.
Read more about community
brainly.com/question/24452126
#SPJ1
Name the delegates who opposed the mention of slavery in the declaration of independence?
Answer:
Thomas Jefferson, in an early version of the Declaration, drafted a 168-word passage that condemned slavery as one of the many evils foisted upon the colonies by the British crown.
3. What is the main idea of this document?
Read the excerpt from 1 Kings 5.
And Hiram gave Solomon cedar wood and cypress wood (according to) all his desire.
And Solomon gave Hiram twenty thousand measures of wheat (for) food to his household, and twenty measures of beaten oil, thus gave Solomon to Hiram year by year.
And the Lord gave Solomon wisdom, as He had promised him, and there was peace between Hiram and Solomon, and they both made a league* together. . . .
And Solomon's builders and Hiram's builders . . . prepared the timber and the stones to build the house.*
–1 Kings 5:24–26, 32
*league: an agreement to work together for a shared purpose
*house: temple
Which statement best explains the central idea of the passage?
1.Solomon teaches the Israelites to obey their parents and God.
2.Solomon is a good king because he leads his people to victory.
3.Solomon and Hiram agree to work together to build a temple.
4.Solomon uses his wealth to make Jerusalem a great city.
The statement best explains the central idea of the passage "Solomon and Hiram agree to work together to build a temple." Thus, option 3rd is correct.
Who was Solomon?As the Israelite monarch who constructed the first Temple in Jerusalem, Solomon is well-known. He was also the last and second king of a united Israel, which was at the height of its strength during his rule (after his father, David). He is well-known for the Biblical accounts of his wisdom.
The above excerpt states "And Solomon's builders and Hiram's builders . . . prepared the timber and the stones to build the house" which implies they were working together to build a temple in their city. Therefore, it can be concluded that option 3rd is correct.
Learn more about Solomon here:
https://brainly.com/question/15114613
#SPJ9
Which branch of government has the ability to declare war?
The branch of government that can declare war is Legislative Branch. option (A) is correct.
The legislative branch proposes legislation, confirms or rejects presidential nominations for heads of federal agencies, federal judges, and the Supreme Court, and has the right to declare war.
The sole power to proclaim war is conceded by the Constitution to Congress. Congress pronounced war multiple times, including its most memorable statement of war against the Unified Realm in 1812.
The Constitution enables Congress to make regulations and proclaim battle, as well as the position to affirm or dismiss numerous Official selections and lead broad examinations. The president and Congress share war powers under the Constitution.
Learn more about declare war:
https://brainly.com/question/14184791
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
Which branch of government has the ability to declare war?
a. Legislative Branch
b. Judicial Branch
c. Executive Branch
PART A: Which statement best summarizes the text? A. While slavery is unacceptable in free societies, slavery is acceptable in tyrannical societies where slavery is always voluntary and political. B. Slavery in theory is unnatural; however, in practice, it is natural to enslave black people due to their obvious inferiority. C. It is human nature to reject slavery as unfair and harmful to all, yet some societies embrace it because those in power are not willing to work for their prosperity. D. Religion is responsible for the majority of civil and political slavery in the world, although Christianity is now working to undo this pattern
It is human nature to reject slavery as unfair and harmful to all, yet some societies embrace it because those in power are not willing to work for their prosperity is the statement best summarizes the text. Hence, option C is correct.
What are justifications for slavery?Deference to the Bible and thus to God, the fact that some people are innately slaves who require supervision, the fact that slaves are frequently better off than the poorest non-slaves, the fact that slavery is a time-tested practice by numerous great civilizations, and the fact that some slaves are better off than the poorest non-slaves are among the arguments in favor of slavery.
The Three-Fifths Clause, the twenty-year moratorium on Congress abolishing the slave trade, the fugitive slave clause, and the slave insurrections were the specific Constitutional provisions relating to slavery.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more information about justifications for slavery, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28925113
#SPJ9
what word refers to the medium of a story
Answer:Film
Explanation:
What did Nehru ji mean by saying hindu Pakistan
Nehru ji used the term "hindu Pakistan" to describe the possibility of India becoming a Hindu majoritarian state, similar to how Pakistan had become a Muslim majoritarian state.
He believed that such a development would be detrimental to the secular and pluralistic values that India was founded on. Nehru ji warned against the dangers of religious nationalism and the potential for it to divide and harm the nation. That is to say, he warned of all the negative processes that nationalism could bring, considering that this is a social as well as a political stance.
See more India about at https://brainly.com/question/30273804.
#SPJ11
According to the timeline, during which year did NASA first launch a satellite into orbit?
A) 1961
B) 1965
C) 1969
D) 1962
Timeline of Saturn Launches Leading to Apollo 11
1961- President Kennedy challenges the nation to launch a human being into space by the end of the decade
1961- First Saturn flight flies a 215-mile trajectory from Cape Canaveral
1962- Second Saturn flight is launched to gather engineering data for future flights
1965- Eighth Saturn flight places a Pegasus I satellite in orbit
1969- Saturn V propels the crew of Apollo II into space
Answer:
1957 - the Soviet union launched the Earth first artificial satellite Sputnik lthe declaration of the rights of man and citizen
the reign of terror
what historical period is associated with these events?
your answer options are
A. the renaissance
B. the french revolution
C. the american revolution
D the protestant reformation
the renaissance is associated with these events, the declaration of the rights of man and citizen. Option A) the renaissance
The representatives of the French people, gathered in a National Assembly, determined to lay out in a solemn declaration the natural, unalienable, and sacred rights of man in order that this declaration, which is constantly in front of all members of the Social body, shall remind them continuously of their rights and duties, believing that ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the only causes of public calamities and of the corruption of governments. the declaration of human and citizen rights the terror regime What time period in history is this incident related to? The French Revolution, the American Revolution, or the Renaissance are your possible answers. D the reformation of protestants
Learn more about French Revolution here :
https://brainly.com/question/2796465
#SPJ4
How many programs were available at Sheridan Technical Center in 1967?
On September 14, 1967, Sheridan Vocational-Technical Center's Phase I received its official dedication. During the 1967–1968 academic year, 200 high school students could choose from six (6) different programmes.
Sheridan Technical Center offered courses in 1967. data about specific institutions. Sheridan Technical Center, located in Hollywood, Florida, was established in 1968 as the Sheridan Vocational-Technical Center.
It's possible that the center offered vocational programs at that time, but I don't have information about the specific number of programs that were available in 1967, as it was not yet established.
Since its opening in 2014, the school has been regarded as one of the top 5 in Broward County. Sheridan Technical High School is a modern, public magnet school with a "A" rating that emphasises technical education. In small class sizes, students receive demanding academic, technical, and technological instruction.
For such more question on Technical
https://brainly.com/question/21020340
#SPJ4
Analyzing Historical Questions Combine the information from all three sources. Explain why segregation remained in place for so long in the American South? Who resisted change?
Segregation in the American South persisted for many decades due to a combination of historical, political, economic, and cultural factors.
Resistance to change came from a variety of groups and individuals, including white politicians, business leaders, and ordinary citizens.
Why was segregation in place for so long ?The American South has a long history of racial inequality and discrimination, which dates back to slavery. Even after the end of slavery, racial discrimination continued in the form of segregation laws and practices.
Segregation was also tied to economic factors, as white business owners often refused to hire black workers or serve black customers. Some of the most vocal opponents of desegregation were members of the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremacist organizations.
Find out more on segregation at https://brainly.com/question/1574751
#SPJ1
ASAP please!
In what way did the cotton club represent the conflict between conservatism and modernity 1928?
Answer:A.The club's popular bartender was Duke Elligton,yet African Americans were not allowed in the audience.
The Cotton Club, a famous nightclub in Harlem during the 1920s and 1930s, was a symbol of the clash between conservatism and modernity in America. Hence option A is correct .
What way did the cotton club represent the conflict between conservatism and modernity 1928?On the one hand, the club represented a traditional, conservative form of entertainment that catered to the tastes of wealthy white patrons. On the other hand, it was a hub of modernity, featuring African American performers who were pushing the boundaries of art, music, and fashion.
The Cotton Club's owners enforced a strict dress code and segregation policy, which reflected the conservative racial attitudes of the time. However, the club also showcased some of the most innovative African American artists of the era, including Duke Ellington, Cab Calloway, and Lena Horne, who were challenging traditional notions of what black art and culture could be.
Ultimately, the Cotton Club represented a paradoxical intersection of conservatism and modernity in America. While it provided a platform for African American creativity and helped to popularize jazz music, it was also a product of a racially divided and conservative society that sought to maintain the status quo.
Learn more about conservatism and modernity 1928 here
https://brainly.com/question/11869399
#SPJ2
Question 10 of 10
In a command economy, decisions about which goods are produced are
based on:
OA. what the government decides is important for society
OB. what goods are most likely to sell in international markets.
C. what businesses believe will generate the most profits.
OD. what the local community has made for generations.
SUBMIT
In a command economy, decisions about which goods are produced are based on what the government decides is important for society. Thus, the correct answer is option A.
What is a command economy?A command economy is a type of political system in which a central governmental authority determines the permissible levels of production and the prices that can be charged for goods and services. The majority of industries are owned by the government.
A free market system in which demand determines production and prices is the main alternative to a command economy. The command economy is a component of a communist political system, whereas capitalist societies have a free market system.
Therefore, what the government decides is important for society is found in a command economy.
To learn more about command economy, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17815549
#SPJ9
blue raspberry flavor and color were first used in the united states in 1958 to add interest to what frozen treat?
The frozen treat that first used blue raspberry flavor and color in the United States in 1958 was the Otter Pop.
Otter Pops are ice pops that come in a variety of fruit flavors and are packaged in clear plastic sleeves. The blue raspberry flavor and color were added to the Otter Pops to make them stand out and appeal to children.
The unique blue color and sweet-tart flavor of blue raspberry were not found in nature but were created by food scientists using artificial flavors and colors.
Today, blue raspberry flavor and color can be found in a variety of foods and beverages, including candies, soda, and sports drinks. The popularity of blue raspberry flavor and color continues to grow, and it remains a favorite among many consumers, especially children.
For more questions like Raspberry click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/18365157
#SPJ4
How did industrialization promote British imperialism? Provide two historical examples as support.
Explanation:
Industrialization played a significant role in promoting British imperialism, as it allowed for the expansion of Britain's economic and political influence in various parts of the world. Here are two historical examples that illustrate this:
The Scramble for Africa: In the late 19th century, European powers began to compete for control of African territories, which were rich in natural resources and offered new markets for European manufactured goods. Britain, which had a significant head start in industrialization, was able to use its economic and military power to secure control over a large portion of Africa. The British were particularly interested in territories that were rich in minerals, such as gold, diamonds, and copper, which were essential for powering the machines of the industrial revolution. The British South Africa Company, led by Cecil Rhodes, was a key player in the scramble for Africa, and helped Britain gain control over territories that would later become Zimbabwe and Zambia.
The Opium Wars: In the mid-19th century, Britain was looking for new markets for its manufactured goods, particularly textiles, which had become the cornerstone of its industrial economy. China, however, was a closed market, and the Chinese government had strict regulations on foreign trade. To overcome this, the British East India Company began smuggling opium into China, which created a huge demand among the Chinese people. The Chinese government responded by outlawing opium, which led to a series of conflicts between China and Britain, known as the Opium Wars. Britain emerged victorious and forced China to open its ports to foreign trade, which allowed British goods to flood into China and helped fuel Britain's industrial economy.
In both of these examples, industrialization gave Britain an economic advantage, which it used to expand its imperial ambitions. Britain was able to use its technological and military superiority to secure control over new territories, which provided it with access to new resources and markets. This helped to fuel Britain's industrial economy, which in turn allowed it to expand its imperial reach even further.
Case A
The drama class at a middle school was preparing for their spring play in the school auditorium. One week before the performance, a parent complained to the school board that the play was inappropriate for middle school students. The school board agreed and contacted the principal, who then informed the classes that the show was canceled. Students were upset that their preparations were a waste. They believe they have the right to freedom of expression in performing the play. The school board said that students are minors and that it must approve decisions about what is presented in school by teachers or students. The students did not have time to plan a different show. A group of the students’ parents brought the case to court on their behalf, but they lost the case in state district court. The students’ parents appealed the district court’s decision to their state court of appeals. There the students and their parents won the case, but the school board appealed the decision to their state-level supreme court. The state supreme court ruled in favor of the school board. Unhappy with the state supreme court’s decision, the students’ parents are now appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Step 1: Answer the following questions in complete sentences.
• What is this case about?
The case is about
• How is this case similar to the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case?
• Which type of expression listed in the First Amendment relates to this case?
Step 2: Make your Decision.
• Why did the school board believe they had the right to cancel the play?
• Why did the students believe they had the right to perform the play?
• Should the students be allowed to perform their school play? Why or why not? Give three reasons to support your decision. At least one of your reasons should be based on what you learned about the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case.
Reason #1:
Reason #2:
Reason #3:
• Do you think the school should be allowed to censor the material of a school play or school newspaper? Why or why not? Be sure to use what you know about the First Amendment to support your answer.
Step 1: Answer the following questions in complete sentences.
What is this case about?This case is about a group of middle school students who were preparing for a spring play in the school auditorium, which was cancelled by the school board one week before the performance due to a parent's complaint that the play was inappropriate for middle school students. The students and their parents then brought the case to court, with the state supreme court ultimately ruling in favor of the school board.
• How is this case similar to the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case?
This case is similar to the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case in that it deals with the issue of free speech and expression in a school setting. Both cases involve schools restricting student expression, with the Hazelwood case specifically addressing the rights of school officials to control the content of school-sponsored publications.
• Which type of expression listed in the First Amendment relates to this case?
The type of expression listed in the First Amendment that relates to this case is freedom of speech.
Step 2: Make your Decision.
• Why did the school board believe they had the right to cancel the play?
The school board believed they had the right to cancel the play because they are responsible for approving decisions about what is presented in school by teachers or students, and they determined that the play was inappropriate for middle school students.
• Why did the students believe they had the right to perform the play?
The students believed they had the right to perform the play because they believed in their freedom of expression and felt that they had put a lot of time and effort into preparing for the performance.
• Should the students be allowed to perform their school play? Why or why not? Give three reasons to support your decision. At least one of your reasons should be based on what you learned about the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case.
I believe that the students should be allowed to perform their school play. Here are three reasons to support my decision:
The students have a right to freedom of expression under the First Amendment, and this includes the right to express themselves through artistic performances such as a school play.
The students had already put in a significant amount of time and effort preparing for the play, and cancelling it at the last minute was unfair to them.
While the school board does have a responsibility to ensure that students are not exposed to inappropriate content, the content of the play had already been approved by the drama teacher, who is a trained professional and should be trusted to make such decisions.
This is similar to the Hazelwood case, in which the school officials were not allowed to censor student publications unless they could prove that the content was substantially disruptive to the educational process. In this case, the school board did not have sufficient grounds to cancel the play.
Learn more about Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier case here
https://brainly.com/question/30459343
#SPJ1
In this situation, it appears that students can claim that their First Amendment rights to free speech have been upheld, but we should keep in mind that when we infringe on the rights of others, our rights stop.
What is rights to free speech?No law establishing a religion, forbidding its free practice, restricting the right to free speech, or restricting the ability to petition the government for a remedy of grievances may be passed by Congress.
The idea of freedom of speech encourages people to express their thoughts and opinions openly and without concern about legal repercussions, censorship, or other forms of retaliation.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international human rights law both regard the freedom of expression as a fundamental human right.
Free speech is protected by constitutional legislation in several nations. In political debate, terms like free speech, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression are frequently used interchangeably.
Nonetheless, regardless of the media utilized, the freedom of expression in a legal sense encompasses any action of obtaining, receiving, and disseminating information or ideas.
Learn more about rights to free speech, here
https://brainly.com/question/29769920
#SPJ1
what are the key compromises and provisions incorporated in the US constitution
The "Great Compromise," also known as the "Connecticut Compromise," was a unique plan for congressional representation that resolved the most contentious aspect of the Constitution's drafting.
What is a compromise in the Constitution?Also known as the Connecticut Compromise, the Connecticut Compromise was a major compromise at the Constitutional Convention that established a two-house legislature with the Senate having equal representation for all jurisdictions and the House of Representatives having representation increases in proportion to state populations.
The resulting United States Constitution has been dubbed a "bundle of compromises" because delegates had to concede on numerous key points in order to create a Constitution that was acceptable to all 13 states. In the end, all 13 ratified it in 1789.
Learn more about the Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/5369828
#SPJ9
3. How did the U.S. Constitution impact the French Revolution?
Answer:
The U.S. Constitution is also thought to have contributed to the 1789 French Revolution. Indeed, America's model of constitutionalism inspired the establishment of a constitutional government in France in 1791 – the National Assembly.
Explanation:
[20 POINTS]
1. 2-3 Paragraphs Explain the Manhattan Project (Truman did not know about it until two weeks after becoming President in 1945) [MAKE SURE IT'S AT LEAST 2 PARAGRAPHS PLS] And don't plagiarize. :)
2. In 2-3 paragraphs please present your recommendation to Truman on using Atomic Bombs. [ALSO MAKE SURE IT'S AT LEAST 2 PARAGRAPHS PLS!]
Answer:
The Manhattan Project was a research and development program during World War II that produced the first atomic bombs. It was launched in 1939 after the discovery of nuclear fission by German scientists. The project was led by the United States with the support of the United Kingdom and Canada. It involved more than 130,000 scientists, engineers, and other personnel, and cost nearly $2 billion (equivalent to about $28 billion today). The project was highly secretive, and even President Truman, who became President after Roosevelt's death in April 1945, did not know about it until two weeks after taking office. The first atomic bomb was successfully tested in Alamogordo, New Mexico, on July 16, 1945, and on August 6, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, killing an estimated 140,000 people.
The Manhattan Project was created as a response to the fear that Nazi Germany would develop an atomic bomb first and use it as a weapon during World War II. The project was mainly focused on producing a weapon that would help the Allies win the war. The project's scientific director, J. Robert Oppenheimer, was responsible for coordinating the work of various scientists, including Enrico Fermi, who successfully produced the world's first controlled nuclear chain reaction. The Manhattan Project's work was carried out in secret, and its existence was known to only a few high-level government officials. Even the workers who were part of the project were kept in the dark about the full extent of the program. The project's success in producing the atomic bomb was a turning point in world history, and it marked the beginning of the nuclear age, which brought about a new era of global political, military, and scientific challenges.
why did government officials want to relocate native americans to the west?
The government officials want to relocate native Americans to the west as they sought to make this area available to American farmers for settlement. Due to overcrowding and the fresh influx of Indians compelled to migrate west, the remaining tribes would suffer.
Why did the American government aim to drive out Native Americans?The 1830 Indian Relocation Act, which President Andrew Jackson supported and was passed immediately before George Catlin's journeys along the frontier, forced tribes in the southeast to relocate west of the Mississippi River. The Act's main goal was to open up additional land for white colonization.
As the population of the United States increased, the federal government wanted to evict Native Americans to make room for western expansion. The removal of Native Americans from Indian Country and their relocation to the west across the Mississippi River was the primary policy objective of the Removal Era.
To learn more about Indian Relocation Act, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7399931
#SPJ4
Is interpretation of dreams worth reading?
Yes, the interpretation of dreams is worth reading. It is a very interesting and insightful book that delves into the psychology and meaning of dreams. It provides a unique perspective on the way our minds work and how our subconscious thoughts can influence our waking life. The book is also written in a way that is easy to understand, making it accessible to a wide range of readers.
Furthermore, the interpretation of dreams is considered a classic in the field of psychology and is still referenced by many experts today. It has had a significant impact on the way we think about and understand dreams, making it a valuable read for anyone interested in this topic.
Overall, the interpretation of dreams is definitely worth reading for its insightful and thought-provoking content, as well as its lasting impact on the field of psychology.
To learn more about the interpretation of dreams, visit:https://brainly.com/question/9733875#
#SPJ11
Making Generalizations Martin Luther King, Jr., in his "Letter from Birmingham Jail" said that
"segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality." In her final paragraph, Moody states that "The whites had a disease, an incurable disease in its final stages." What are King and Moody trying to say about how people behave when they believe a law is unjust? Why might people act irrationally?
Both Martin Luther King, Jr. and Anne Moody are making generalizations about how people behave when they believe a law is unjust. They argue that such beliefs can lead to deep-seated psychological and emotional effects on individuals and society as a whole.
What was the King and Moody trying to say?King argues that segregation, as an unjust law, not only perpetuates social inequality and injustice, but also has a damaging effect on the souls and personalities of both the oppressed and oppressors. He believes that segregation forces people to live in an atmosphere of inferiority, which can lead to feelings of worthlessness, bitterness, and resentment. On the other hand, those who benefit from segregation become complacent and callous, losing touch with their own humanity and moral values.
Similarly, Moody argues that white people in the South who believed in segregation were suffering from an "incurable disease" that had damaged their ability to think and behave rationally. She suggests that the belief in the superiority of one's own race, and the resulting discrimination and oppression of others, can lead to a distorted and irrational worldview.
People might act irrationally when they believe a law is unjust because they may feel that their basic human rights and dignity are being violated
Learn more about Martin Luther King, Jr., at:
https://brainly.com/question/24034250
#SPJ1
early february is halfway between what two seasonal events.
True or false?
Answers:
true
Explanation:
new year and valentines day
where are these bronze statues of influential men in american history?
Although I am a language model AI and do not have access to the precise location of bronze statues, these are some of the locations where bronze statues of significant figures from American history are most frequently found.
As a language model AI, I do not have access to real-time information, but these bronze statues of influential men in American history can be found in various locations across the United States such as:
Abraham Lincoln Memorial - Washington D.C.
George Washington Memorial - Mount Vernon, Virginia
Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial - Washington D.C.
Martin Luther King Jr Memorial - Washington D.C.
Thomas Jefferson Memorial - Washington D.C.
Robert E. Lee Memorial - Richmond, Virginia
Ulysses S. Grant Memorial - Washington D.C.
Theodore Roosevelt Memorial - Washington D.C.
James A. Garfield Memorial - Cleveland, Ohio
Benjamin Franklin Memorial - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
These are just a few examples, and there are many more bronze statues of influential men in American history located in various cities and states across the country.
Learn more about bronze statues here:
https://brainly.com/question/28934221
#SPJ4
Part B
Once oral arguments are concluded and a verdict has been reached, you are asked to write the opinion for one group of Supreme Court justices: you can choose which side of the argument to support. Review this information about the power to declare war.
Using this information and the scenario discussed above, write a 250-word essay declaring whether or not the War Powers Act works within the constitutional authority of Congress. Cite evidence to support your claim, and use examples from the scenario to illustrate your points. Review the Process section below for help researching and writing your essay.
Process
Follow the steps below to complete your essay, and use the links provided to assist with your research and writing.
Gather sources. Begin by gathering additional sources to build your argument. Make sure that you examine your sources for accuracy. For each source, consider these questions:
Who authored the document?
What is the purpose of the document?
When was the document written?
How will this document help your argument?
Develop your argument. Now that you have analyzed sources to use as evidence, revisit the essay question. Then develop your argument with these factors in mind:
Your argument should be well supported by your research.
Match the evidence in your sources to the points in your argument.
Write your essay. As you write your paper, use quotations from and summaries of your sources to support your argument. Be careful to keep these ideas in mind:
To avoid plagiarism, make sure to cite your sources properly with in-text citations and a works cited page. Consult an online Style Guide if needed.
When you are finished, reread your essay to check for all of the points above, and then proofread it to be sure your work doesn't contain errors in grammar or spelling.
The conflict between the President and Congress within the American constitutional framework is not limited to the power to declare war.
What happens after oral arguments in Supreme Court?The Justices must reach a decision on the matter after oral arguments are finished. At a gathering called as the Justices' Conference, they do this. A Wednesday afternoon conference and a Friday afternoon conference are scheduled each week the Court is in session.
The ability to declare war is just one component of the friction between the President and Congress under the American constitutional structure. Both struggle to increase their capacity to shape the nation's political behavior. The Constitution is ambiguous in this regard, and there have been some disputes over how it should be interpreted. But, the political system she establishes offers the President more flexible procedures and room to maneuver so that their impact is seen in front of Congress.
The president of the United States "has the constitutional authority to counterattack against any person, organization, or State suspected of involvement in terrorist attacks against the United States, as well as against foreign States suspected of hosting or supporting such organizations," according to the constitution. It is a "constitutional power," which was "collected by Congress" on September 14, 2001, barely three days after the 9/11 events, and is "inherent to the Presidency." Without asking Congress for permission, this is conceivable. as when Barack Obama ordered to bomb Libya in March 2011.
The Congress will be able to "declare war and make laws for the seizure of lands and rivers," among other authorities, according to Section Eight of Article One of the Constitution, it is true. But, it is equally accurate to say that the text does not define what a "war" is. This is the reason why several other wars, like the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the invasion of Iraq, and the Afghan War, are referred to as "military confrontations" while having congressional approval.
To learn more about oral arguments refer to:
brainly.com/question/26719799
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Once oral arguments are concluded and a verdict has been reached, you are asked to write the opinion for one group of Supreme Court justices: you can choose which side of the argument to support.
Read this article that argues in support of Congress's position and this article that argues in support of the president's position. Using this data and the scenario discussed above, write a 250-word essay declaring whether or not the War Powers Act works within the constitutional authority of Congress. Cite evidence to support your claim, and use examples from the scenario to illustrate your points. Review the Process section below for help researching and writing your essay.
why did laboulaye want to create a monument to the united states?
De Laboulaye suggested erecting a monument in honour of the United States in 1865.
De Laboulaye made the case that commemorating the United States would further the cause of democracy in France in light of the recent Union triumph in the Civil War, which reaffirmed the American principles of freedom and democracy.
For the purpose of promoting the notion of a massive statue of Liberty as a gift from the French to the American people in recognition of the 100th anniversary of American independence, Bartholdi made his first voyage to the United States in 1871.
To know more about Democracy, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ4
What led the United States into the War of 1812?
Answer:
british orders in council and impressment
Explanation:
the royals navys practice of taking seamen from us warships.