Answer:
Is this a True or false if so.. it's true??
Explanation:
Where would an investigator mark a collected bullet with their own initials?
A .on the side
B .on the base
around the bullet
C .a bullet should never be marked
D .a bullet should never be marked
Answer:
B .on the base
around the bullet
Within police departments, there is a focus on the status of individuals as opposed to their behavior. Training officers [TOs] teach recruits what to look for in terms of potential danger, and officers tell each other stories about things they have seen that mark individuals as dangerous. This can be referred to as:
Group of answer choices
criminal motivation
criminal intent
police interaction
criminal blindness
Answer:
the answer is criminal motivationnnnnnn
Explanation:
Which court decision protected students’ rights to free speech as early as 1969?
Earl
Tinker
Acton
If the authorized sources do not provide sufficient guidance, you should
(Select the best answer)
When the authorized sources do not provide sufficient guidance, it should be noted that the person will have to refer to other officials for assistance.
It should be noted that the protection of classified information from unauthorized disclosure is critical. It's important to be familiar with the responsibilities and procedures in order to know where the person will go for guidance.
This is vital to successfully implement and execute them at one's facility. Therefore, in a case where the authorized sources do not provide sufficient guidance, the person will have to refer to other officials for assistance.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25771019
According to Florida law if you knowingly fail to report a case of child abuse or neglect
Answer:
Third Degree Felony and punishable by up to five years in prison, five years of probation, and a $5,000 fine.
Explanation:
According to Florida law if you knowingly fail to report a case of child abuse or neglect of a child in Florida is considered a felony.
If the abuse or neglect does not cause any bodily damage or motive any disfigurement or incapacity, it is a third-degree felony and the consequences encompass as much as five years of probation or five years in prison, and a fine of up to $5,000.
What is the definition of a felony?
In US law, a felony is typically defined as a crime punishable by means of a term of imprisonment of no longer much less than one year or by the death penalty. Misdemeanors, in comparison, are frequently described as offenses punishable most effective through fines or via quick phrases of imprisonment in local jails.
Conclusion: The most serious crimes are labeled as felonies. A felony consists of crimes like homicide, terrorism, cocaine trafficking, and many others.
learn more about homicide here https://brainly.com/question/6228473
#SPJ2
What is the best way to achieve good governance? Elaborate your answer.
Governance is the process by which corporations establish their rules and policies and implement and monitor them. Good governance has a variety of important characteristics, and it can mean different things to different people.
ParticipationConsensus orientedAccountabilityTransparencyResponsiveEffective and efficientEquitable and inclusiveFollows the rule of lawStrategic visionwhat is personal reaction about RA. 11058? (essay)
plss i need your help asap.
I think that the Republic Act No. 11058 is a crucial advancement in the Philippines for their way of running companies. The act requires everyone to comply with occupational safety and health standards, ensure employees are on-par with their training, conduct audit compliance records, inform workers on all types of hazards in the workplace, and so on. Without rulings like this, workers in the Philippines are at a disadvantage for their health and safety. It is important that rules like these are passed and continue to be passed.
I hope this helps! :)
RA 11058 (Republic Act No. 11058) is a law in the Philippines also known as the "Act Strengthening Compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Standards (OSHS) and Providing Penalties for Violations Thereof."
What is the importance of safety training OSHA?Training in workplace safety is as important as actual workplace safety. It gives management the ability to maintain a secure and healthy workplace. Additionally, it aids staff in identifying and addressing safety issues. They are able to comprehend standards and optimum safety practices thanks to it.
The law aims to promote and protect the safety and health of workers by ensuring that employers comply with occupational safety and health standards in the workplace.
The law is seen as a significant step towards improving working conditions and preventing workplace accidents and injuries in the Philippines. However, some critics have raised concerns about the law's implementation and enforcement, particularly regarding the potential costs and burdens on small businesses.
Learn more about Republic Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/29787477
#SPJ2
Statistics on arson are limited in the sense that only fires classified as arson are reported to agencies like the FBI. True False
Answer:
This is true.
Agencies must classify arson as fires.I hope this helped at all.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Elisa bought 5 bracelets for a total of $25.95. If the bracelets were the same cost, about how much did each bracelet cost? $4.00 $125.00 $5.19 $5.00
Answer:
they would cost 5.19
Explanation:
5•5=25
.19•5=.95
together they add up to 5.19
An officer grabs a reluctant suspect by the arm and escorts the suspect to the police
vehicle. In the use of force continuum, this is an example of
non-verbal
command
hard hand
soft hand
Answer:
hard hand
Explanation:
use complete sentences. What do you think is the most serious crime affecting society? Why?
Answer:
Shootings and gun violence because the first reason being the most obvious is that it kills people and traumatizes families and the people that also had to witness the shooting. There have been over 50 deadly shootings and the police have had to obtain almost 300 guns. I also believe that the Columbine shooting has triggered all the other documented school shootings as well. Now kids have to do shooting drills and schools are cracking down on safety and security which leaves any child going to school having to worry if it’ll be the last time they say goodbye to their parents. It’s a terrible and evil crime that needs to end.
Explanation:
Patricia Bell (63) shared a home all year with her son, Anthony (41), and Anthony's son, Damonte (20). Patricia and Anthony worked full-time. Damonte was a part-time student during the year; he took one class at the local community college. He had no income. No one else lived in the home. Patricia and Anthony each have earned income and an adjusted gross income of more than $20,000, but less than $30,000. Who is eligible to claim and receive the Earned Income Tax Credit?
Answer:
Explanation:
Ua
Anthony is eligible to claim and receive Earned Income Tax Credit.
To claim and receive Earned Income Tax Credit, the individual must meet the following criteria:
Have an income of less than 40,000 if not married.Have at least one child, student, aged between 19-24 years old.Living with this child in the same house.Have a job that can be partial or full time.As we can see from the question above, only Anthony fits all the requirements, he is the only one who can apply for and receive the Earned Income Tax Credit.
More information about tax credit:
https://brainly.com/question/2135349
In a perfectly competitive market, the seller is the
Explanation:
There are a large number of buyers and sellers in a perfectly competitive market. The sellers are small firms, instead of large corporations capable of controlling prices through supply adjustments. They sell products with minimal differences in capabilities, features, and pricing. Brainliest pls
When and how a penalty is to be executed?
Answer: Capital Punishment, also called death penalty, execution of an offender sentenced to death after convinction by a court of law of a criminal offense.
mixing clients funds with attorney funds is an ethics violation known as
Answer: Commingling
Explanation:
when a lawyer holds his or her own funds in the same account that is holding client or third party funds.
Based on the above quote, explain how the fear of failure is important to entrepreneurs and why finding a good team of people is a key focus of franchise owners.
Answer:
sometimes entrepreneurs don't put in their effort cause of failing. most people don't want to try their best inorder not to fail or get a bad record and this limit human knowledge and understanding of things and how to push forward
Suppose a defendant is convicted at trial but believes that the judge made an error that impacted the decision. She would first ask her case be tried again at ________. If she were to lose at that court, she could still try again, if her argument were accepted, at the ________.
court of appeals; supreme court
The court of appeals determines whether or not the law was applied correctly, typically in cases where one is asked to have their cased tried again for a variety of reasons. In most cases, those who fail again and have their argument accepted will then be brought in front of the supreme court.
I hope this helps! :)
Initially, a defendant's case is at a trial court (Federal, State, Circuit Courts).
Then the case proceeds to the Court of Appeal before finally moving to the Supreme Court of the state or at the federal level.
But it is not true that all cases must move to the Supreme Court when the defendant appeals. The movement to the highest court requires the acceptance of the defendant's argument and the merit of each case.
Thus, the defendant's case can move from a trial court, an appeals court, and then to the supreme court.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/11640159
please help answer this asap!
Is this a criminal or civil case? explain why.
article:
With Mounties due for a pay bump, cash-strapped municipalities seek reprieve from Ottawa:
Mounties are due to receive a chunk of retroactive pay after negotiating their first-ever collective agreement. Some municipalities say the looming salary bump will stress their finances — and they want Ottawa to step up.
This summer, the federal government and the union representing RCMP members ratified an agreement to deliver a sizeable pay increase to nearly 20,000 members.
Constables — who account for more than half of all RCMP officers — will see their maximum salary jump from $86,110 as of April 2016 to $106,576 next year.
The deal also lays out retroactive pay increases going back to 2017. The RCMP last updated its wage scale in 2016 and for years Mounties' pay lagged behind that of other police services.
According to the agreement, the rates of pay will change within 90 days of Aug. 6, when the collective agreement was signed. It's then up to the RCMP to make its "best effort" to implement the retroactive payable amounts within 270 days of signing.
The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) says communities that pay the RCMP for policing services are growing alarmed over the agreement's cost.
"It's widespread coast to coast to coast and our municipalities are actually very concerned, very, very concerned," said FCM president Joanne Vanderheyden, also the mayor of the municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc in Ontario.
"This issue is absolutely urgent given the potential impacts on municipal finances."
Municipalities with populations of less than 15,000 pay 70 per cent of the costs, while the federal government pays 30 per cent. Municipalities with more than 15,000 residents pay 90 per cent.
Vanderheyden said that while negotiations on the collective agreement were happening behind closed doors, municipalities were advised by the federal government to set money aside to cover the anticipated pay hike.
"Well, the percentage was way too low," she said, adding the retroactive pay also came as a surprise to most mayors.
"We are absolutely not against collective bargaining. That's not it. It's when you're not at the table and the direct impact comes to you."
Ottawa is asked to swallow retroactive costs
The FCM has written a letter to the federal government asking it to absorb all retroactive costs associated with the collective agreement.
Without federal help, Vanderheyden said, "municipalities will be forced to make incredibly difficult decisions because they're either going have to make cuts to their essential services or pass it along to the property tax, local residents. Because they can't go into arrears, they can't go to deficits."
Peter Brown, mayor of Airdrie in Alberta, said that while he firmly supports paying RCMP officers more, he was surprised by the final price tag. He said his city, just north of Calgary, has budgeted and held money back over the past few years but still has only about half of what it needs to cover the added policing costs.
"The message from me is, recognize that we've all been hit. We're all suffering," he said, referring to the pandemic.
Brown said the collective agreement's impact on Airdrie's budget is "probably in a $3.5 million to $4 million range. That's the equivalent [of] a five per cent tax increase."
Codiac RCMP spending rises to $39M in proposed 2022 budget
Malcolm Brodie, mayor of Richmond, B.C., said his municipality estimates the retroactive pay lump sum will cost it something between $9 million and $11 million, plus the annual pay increase itself.
"What that means for us is to cover that the amount going forward on our budget, that's about a one-time 2.5 to 3.5 per cent tax increase," he said.
"We certainly have stayed with the RCMP for a good reason. We think that they've done a good job for our community. Having said that, you know, it's getting a whole lot more expensive."
A spokesperson for the federal Department of Public Safety said the department has kept in touch with regions with RCMP contracts on a regular basis since 2018.
"Contracting jurisdictions were aware that the salary of RCMP officers had been frozen since 2016 and that the collective bargaining process began in 2020. With the new collective agreement for RCMP regular members and reservists, salaries are in line with other police services across Canada," said Tim Warmington.
"It is fair for regular members and reservists as well as reasonable for Canadian taxpayers."
answer please!!
Answer:
WE NOT FINNA READ ALL THIS YOU CRAZY
why does your website suck because first of all I have failed multiple assignment because of this website never using it again
Answer:
you can't always rely on every stranger over the internet to help give you answers, look for trusted and newer sources from articles, reports, or other sources.
Explanation:
What are the 3 elements of communication dynamics?
Answer:
Dynamic and that It and you will get your answer
Based on the excerpt above, explain the link between economic and political freedoms.
Answer:
Explain how the response in part (A) affects or is affected by a political process, government entity, or citizen behavior as related to the scenario (0–1 point) (Disciplinary Practice 1.d) §Explain how the scenario relates to a political institution, behavior, or process in …
Explanation:
why might a teenager confess to a crime they didn’t commit
Answer:
Teens are more likley to be influcened by social influence.
Explanation:
The police make the teenager feel as if denials are absurd, and confessing is the only avalible option. The police might try to be the suspect's friend and will claim to show more forgivness if they confess (which in the end persuades them to confess falsley).
Indeterminate sanctions include community service, restitution, fines, boot camp, home confinement and _________________
Describe four of the factors which may have been relevant to the public interest part of the Full Code test in Sally Challen’s case.
According to the Full Code Test, the four factors that were relevant to the public interest in the case of Sally Challen are as follows:
1. Seriosity of the Offence: Sally was found culpable in the murder of her abusive husband, Richard Sally. The murder shows a commitment of serious harm to Richard's life and endangered public safety if it remained unchecked. Sometimes, the abused becomes the abuser.
2. Culpability Level: Sally was adjudged culpable in the murder of Richard, having been directly involved in the act. She premeditated and planned the murder. But there was no history of any previous convictions in her case.
3. Circumstance and Harm: The circumstance in which Sally killed her husband was not considered in her conviction. Sally had suffered unabated abuses in the hands of her husband for many decades. According to her, the husband made her behave abnormally.
4. Societal Impact: The murder was bound to influence other women to give similar treatments to their abusive husbands if not checked by the court conviction. In the same way, the overturning of her earlier conviction from murder to manslaughter influenced victims of abusive husbands to seek redress. Every unlawful use of force against a person attracts public interest.
Interestingly, Sally Challen's conviction for murder was eventually commuted to manslaughter after her appeal, which determined that Richard Challen must have subjected Sally to coercive control.
According to Professor Evan Stark, coercive control involves the erosion of a person's self-esteem through constant humiliation, intimidation, punishment, and other abusive assertions of power. The aim of coercive control is to isolate the victim and make dependent on the perpetrator. A victim of coercive control is often deprived of basic needs while their daily routine is subject to total control.
Thus, according to the Full Code Test, after passing the evidential stage, prosecutors must subject the case to the public interest stage before determining whether or not to proceed with the prosecution.
Related question: https://brainly.com/question/25644506
One country has a comparative advantage over another country in the production of a good if it.
A country has a comparative advantage over another country as regards production of goods when that country is able to produce the goods at lower cost.
What is comparative advantage?
In economic , comparative advantage can be regarded as an advantage that a country get over the other when that country can produce at lower cost.
In the law of demand and supply, it is established that consumer will definitely go for product with lower price.
Countries that usually specialize as regards comparative advantage usually have a gain from trade.We can conclude that at lower cost of production , a country will have comparative advantage.
Learn more about comparative advantage at;
https://brainly.com/question/14846093
comparison and difference in government vs governance
Answer:
governments: it is an independent factor
governance: depends on the government
Explanation:
Answer:
GIVE CREDIT TO OTHER GUY THOUGH....
governments: it is an independent factor
governance: depends on the government
Explanation:
What are your thoughts on the fact that defendants can engage in bargaining, more frequently initiated by the prosecutor?
Answer:
Some prosecutors also use plea bargains as a way to encourage defendants to testify against codefendants or other accused criminals. Plea bargains allow prosecutors to avoid trials, which are shunned because they are time-consuming, labour-intensive, and costly but carry no guarantee of success.
Explanation:
Cyber forensics phases
Answer:
Identification: find the evidence, noting where it is stored.
Preservation: isolate, secure, and preserve the data.
Analysis: reconstruct fragments of data and draw conclusions based on the evidence found.
Documentation: create a record of all the data to recreate the crime scene.
Presentation: summarize and draw a conclusion.
Isaiah wants to build a new shopping complex. He is afraid that once news gets out about his plans, the price of the land where he wants to build the shopping complex will increase in price. Isaiah, therefore, hires Landon to purchase the parcels of land for him and to keep the fact that Landon is working for Isaiah a secret. Landon enters into a written contract for the sale of the land with Miriam and does not tell Miriam that Landon is an agent for anyone else on the deal. Isaiah refuses to buy the property from Miriam.
Is Landon obligated to perform the contract with Miriam?
a. No, he is not because the purchase of the land benefits only the principal, Isaiah.
b. Yes, he is because agents are always liable for performance on contracts they enter into on behalf of their principal.
c. No, he is not because Landon is not the principal.
d. Yes, he is because there was an undisclosed principal who failed to perform.
Yes Landon is obligated to perform this contract with Miriam. The reason is because Yes, he is because there was an undisclosed principal who failed to perform.
The answer to this question is option d. An obligation can be described as a law that requires a person to do something.
Landon is obligated here because he has entered into a written agreement already with Miriam about the sale of this land. Meanwhile he has followed up with what Isaiah required of him by being silent on the owner.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/25353186?referrer=searchResults
35. David Fahey, a businessman in a medium-sized Ohio town, decides to run for city council. He has a
master's degree, is married, has three sons, and is a respected member of society. He fears he may lose the
upcoming city council election to a newcomer, Keith Joseph, who recently moved back to town after
establishing himself in South Carolina.
David hires his best friend, John, to call in a bomb threat on election day to a precinct where his rival, Keith
Joseph, is expected to garner majority support. This act is an example of
a. election fraud
a
The action of falsely calling a bomb threat on the election day to prevent the people to vote for personal reason is an example of election fraud.
Election fraud entails the following actions that includes:
election manipulationvoter fraud or riggingillegal interference with election process for personal purpose.The intention of David to call a false bomb threat on the election day to prevent people to vote for personal reason is an example of election fraud because it aims to reduced the vote garner by the opposition candidate.
Therefore, the Option A is correct because the act is an example of election fraud.
Read more about Election fraud:
brainly.com/question/24981124