Explanation:
THE PRESIDENT: Mr. Speaker, Leader Reid, Leader McConnell, Leader Pelosi, Assistant Leader Clyburn; to the friends and family of Rosa Parks; to the distinguished guests who are gathered here today.
This morning, we celebrate a seamstress, slight in stature but mighty in courage. She defied the odds, and she defied injustice. She lived a life of activism, but also a life of dignity and grace. And in a single moment, with the simplest of gestures, she helped change America -- and change the world.
Rosa Parks held no elected office. She possessed no fortune; lived her life far from the formal seats of power. And yet today, she takes her rightful place among those who’ve shaped this nation’s course. I thank all those persons, in particular the members of the Congressional Black Caucus, both past and present, for making this moment possible. (Applause.)
A childhood friend once said about Mrs. Parks, “Nobody ever bossed Rosa around and got away with it.” (Laughter.) That’s what an Alabama driver learned on December 1, 1955. Twelve years earlier, he had kicked Mrs. Parks off his bus simply because she entered through the front door when the back door was too crowded. He grabbed her sleeve and he pushed her off the bus. It made her mad enough, she would recall, that she avoided riding his bus for a while.
And when they met again that winter evening in 1955, Rosa Parks would not be pushed. When the driver got up from his seat to insist that she give up hers, she would not be pushed. When he threatened to have her arrested, she simply replied, “You may do that.”
A few days later, Rosa Parks challenged her arrest. A little-known pastor, new to town and only 26 years old, stood with her -- a man named Martin Luther King, Jr. So did thousands of Montgomery, Alabama commuters. They began a boycott -- teachers and laborers, clergy and domestics, through rain and cold and sweltering heat, day after day, week after week, month after month, walking miles if they had to, arranging carpools where they could, not thinking about the blisters on their feet, the weariness after a full day of work -- walking for respect, walking for freedom, driven by a solemn determination to affirm their God-given dignity.
It’s been often remarked that Rosa Parks’s activism didn’t begin on that bus. Long before she made headlines, she had stood up for freedom, stood up for equality -- fighting for voting rights, rallying against discrimination in the criminal justice system, serving in the local chapter of the NAACP. Her quiet leadership would continue long after she became an icon of the civil rights movement, working with Congressman Conyers to find homes for the homeless, preparing disadvantaged youth for a path to success, striving each day to right some wrong somewhere in this world.
And yet our minds fasten on that single moment on the bus -- Ms. Parks alone in that seat, clutching her purse, staring out a window, waiting to be arrested. That moment tells us something about how change happens, or doesn’t happen; the choices we make, or don’t make. “For now we see through a glass, darkly,” Scripture says, and it’s true. Whether out of inertia or selfishness, whether out of fear or a simple lack of moral imagination, we so often spend our lives as if in a fog, accepting injustice, rationalizing inequity, tolerating the intolerable.
Like the bus driver, but also like the passengers on the bus, we see the way things are -- children hungry in a land of plenty, entire neighborhoods ravaged by violence, families hobbled by job loss or illness -- and we make excuses for inaction, and we say to ourselves, that's not my responsibility, there’s nothing I can do.
Rosa Parks tell us there’s always something we can do. She tells us that we all have responsibilities, to ourselves and to one another. She reminds us that this is how change happens -- not mainly through the exploits of the famous and the powerful, but through the countless acts of often anonymous courage and kindness and fellow feeling and responsibility that continually, stubbornly, expand our conception of justice -- our conception of what is possible.
Rosa Parks’s singular act of disobedience launched a movement. The tired feet of those who walked the dusty roads of Montgomery helped a nation see that to which it had once been blind. It is because of these men and women that I stand here today. It is because of them that our children grow up in a land more free and more fair; a land truer to its founding creed.
And that is why this statue belongs in this hall -- to remind us, no matter how humble or lofty our positions, just what it is that leadership requires; just what it is that citizenship requires. Rosa Parks would have turned 100 years old this month. We do well by placing a statue of her here. But we can do no greater honor to her memory than to carry forward the power of her principle and a courage born of conviction.
(hope this helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!
The rise of the guilds would be most directly connected to what medieval process in Western Europe?
O Feudalism
O Manorialism
O Scholasticism
O Specialization
Scholasticism is the medieval process in Western Europe, as the rise of the guilds would be most directly connected Hence,
What is Scholasticism?It frequently drew on writings from antiquity and placed equal emphasis on rational argumentation and Christian theology. Scholasticism was a rational and acceptable method of learning, but it was also dogmatic and strictly adhered to one set of rules. Greek skholastikos, which meaning "a scholar," is where the word "scholasticism" originates.
Scholasticism refers to the philosophical frameworks and speculative tendencies of different medieval Christian scholars who strove to reconsider general philosophical concerns despite working in opposition to unchangeable religious dogma.
Scholastic philosophy dominated institutions between 1100 and 1500. The Scholastics valued empiricism and believed that rationality, logic, and academic inquiry could buttress Roman Catholic beliefs.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more information about Scholasticism, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11009328
#SPJ2
Capitalist theory teaches that with respect to the economy it is best that the government
regulate heavily to keep competition fair
intervene as little as possible and leave it alone
provide significant tax‐funded subsidies to businesses
impose reasonable minimum and maximum prices
In the capitalist theory, what it teaches is that government intervene as little as possible and leave it alone.
What is the capitalist type of economy?
This is the term that is used to refer to the type of economy that exist in a country. In this system the people that own the means of production are the citizens. They advocate for the freedom to do their business with out the government.
This system is known to drive innovation among the people because they have the freedom to do so.
Read more on capitalist economy here: https://brainly.com/question/25879591
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. intervene as little as possible and leave it alone
Explanation:
I took the exam
under kaiser wilhelm germany adopted a foreign policy that included
Under Kaiser Wilhelm Germany adopted a foreign policy that included forming military alliances with other powerful European states.
What is the foreign policy that was adopted by Kaiser Wilhelm Germany?The foreign policy under Wilhelm Germany is developing alliance with military so that the public can be protected.
In this case, Under Kaiser Wilhelm Germany adopted a foreign policy that included forming military alliances with other powerful European states.
Learn more about foreign policy at:
https://brainly.com/question/2196996
#SPJ1
Exercise
Respond to the following based on your reading.
According to the Constitution, how many people represent each state in the Senate?
According to the Constitution, how many people represent each state in the House of Representatives?
Who could vote for representatives in the lower house?
Who would elect the Senators?
Who would elect the President?
What does the “fugitive clause” say in the Constitution?
What was the three-fifths compromise?
The Senate represented by Two people from each state.
A. In an Senate two people represent each state in the Senate.
B. Any white man 21 those who pays taxes, could vote for representatives in the lower house.
C. State legislature elect the Senators.
D. Direct by people
E. No one held to service in one state, under the laws thereof moving into another, shall in consequence of any law or regulation.
F.Every enslaved American could matter as 3-fifths of someone for taxation and illustration purposes.
The constitution granted state legislatures the energy to go with u.s. senators. Supporters of the charter argued that this method of election would beef up the states' ties to the country wide authorities and insulate senators from moving public opinion.
In other U.S. elections, States applicants are elected directly by using popular vote. however the president and vice president are not elected without delay by residents. rather, they're chosen through “electors” thru a process referred to as the Electoral university. The system of the use of electors comes from the charter.
Learn more about Senate here:-https://brainly.com/question/20223742
#SPJ1
General Douglas MacArthur:
General of the Army for the United States and field marshal for the Philippine Army, Douglas MacArthur was a distinguished American military figure. He served as the US Army's Chief of Staff in the 1930s, and during World War II, he was a crucial figure in the Pacific theater.
American General Douglas MacArthur (1880-1964) commanded the Southwest Pacific during World War II (1939–45), oversaw the successful Allied occupation of Japan following the war, and commanded UN forces in the Korean War (1950-1953). More importantly, a thorough examination of World War II reveals that MacArthur was the most creative and accomplished leader of that fight. He was the first to emphasize the need for swift, light, and highly mobile amphibious and air troops operating across great distances in modern conflict.
Learn more about World War II here:-
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ1
Do you think that by releasing the Pentagon Papers, did Ellsberg put the nation, or the world, at risk? To what extent should the government be allowed to have such secrecy?
Considering a point of view it is fair to say that Mr. Ellsberg attacked democracy itself by disclosing the private study. From Ellsberg's view he took it upon himself to inform the public about a crucial issue namely, that the study showed, in his opinion, that the American government had been lying for years about the progress of the war The Pentagon Papers leak may have compromised national security, but only by showing the rest of the world that the US was incapable of keeping its secrets.
Extent to which government should be allowed to have secrecy:
Governmental secrecy has a peculiar quality that results from the lack of a known mechanism for limiting its exercise to specific areas on which reasonable people can agree.
The cost of secrecy extends beyond the spread of mistrust that the government is abusing the public's confidence. It also serves as a means of halting the national discourse in which citizens prepare themselves for important decisions that may require significant sacrifice. The Pentagon Papers serve as the best example of this.
Learn more about Pentagon Papers here:
https://brainly.com/question/2995313
#SPJ1
Jelaskan kepentingan mrnghargai kebijaksanaan pemimpin dalam mentadbir negara.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Answer:
(e)
Explanation:
Which of Samudra Gupta’s achievements is reflected in Map B? adding land through marriage gaining control of the Ganges Basin conquering the rest of northern India expanding across the entire subcontinent
The Samudra Gupta’s achievement that is reflected in Map B is the conquering of the rest of northern India.
What is a map?It should be noted that a map simply means a diagrammatic representation of an area.
In this case, the Samudra Gupta’s achievement that is reflected in Map B is the conquering of the rest of northern India.
Learn more about map on:
brainly.com/question/4289712
#SPJ1
Should the civil rights movement in the twentieth century be considered a "Second Reconstruction"? Compare and contrast the movement with Reconstruction and discuss the outcomes of both.
Some historians have called the Civil Rights Movement the "second Reconstruction" because it eventually realized the commitments made to Black Americans after the Civil War.
What is considered the second reconstruction?During the course from the end of World War II until the late 1960s, often referred to as America's “Second Reconstruction,” the nation began to correct civil and human rights misusages that had lingered in American society for a century.
What was the civil rights campaign of the 20th century?The civil rights movement was a battle for social justice that took place mainly during the 1950s and 1960s for Black Americans to achieve equal rights underneath the law in the United States
To learn more about Second Reconstruction, refer
https://brainly.com/question/17788601
#SPJ9
Every power that belongs to the U.S. government is specifically listed in the U.S. Constitution. True or False?
Every power that belongs to the U.S. government is specifically listed in the U.S. Constitution, the statement is false because only delegated powers are mentioned in the U.S. constitution implied and inherent powers are not mentioned.
More about the powers:
Delegated Power: The Constitution's Article I, Section 8 expressly grants the federal government certain (also known as enumerated or stated) powers. This includes the authority to enact laws governing commerce, coin money, declare war, build and maintain an army, and establish a post office 27 specified authorities in total.
Implied Power: are implied from the elastic (or "necessary and proper") clause but not defined in the Constitution (Article I, Section 8). The phrase "to make all laws" means that Congress has the authority to "make all laws necessary and suitable for carrying into action the foregoing powers, and other authorities inherent in the government of the United States."
Inherent powers: are not officially mentioned in the Constitution, but they result from the national government's very existence. For instance, the United States has the authority to explore for and/or occupy new territory, mainly because most governments generally assert that right.
Learn more about powers here:
https://brainly.com/question/1541617
#SPJ1
What is a tariff……………………………..
Answer:
A tax or duty to be paid on a particular class of imports or exports is called tariff.....:
Calvin is running for class president. Snacks in the student center have become a hot issue at school. Calvin has decided to use a survey to determine which snacks should go into the vending machines in the student center. Which survey will most likely provide the most accurate picture of what the school public wants?
A.
a survey of the teachers
B.
a survey of the seniors
C.
a survey of the football team and the cheerleaders
D.
a random survey of the students
Answer: D is the answer
Explanation:
37. Where did settlements stop by the end of the Colonial Era?
O the Appalachian Mountains
O the northern border of Maryland
O Philadelphia
Othe Hudson River
Answer:
The Appalachian Mountains.
Explanation:
Britain mandated that colonist expansion were to stop at the Appalachian Mountains due to internal conflict between presiding Native American tribes in the region and the colonists taking more land for their own usage. This was removed following the Colonists declaring independence, and continued after the American Revolutionary War.
Learn more about the settlements in historical-United States, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11048501?referrer=searchResults
Where does the name mars originate from?
I don't know
Explanation:
I don't know
Answer:
The Romans
Explanation:
The name "Mars" originates from The Romans, and it was for the Roman's god of war.
I hope it helps! Have a great day!
Pan~
Which of the following was not true of the Untied States population during the 1920's?
The statement that is not true of the United States of American population during the 1920's is that most cities remained constant or the same in population.
What is population?Population can be defined as the number of people that live or occupy a territory or region.
Hence, the statement that is not true of the United States of American population during the 1920's is that most cities remained constant or the same in population. as reversed is the case.
Learn more about population here:https://brainly.com/question/25896797
#SPJ1
The key issue of the 1945 Potsdam
Conference was which of the
following?
A. what to do with what was left of Nazi Germany
B. what to do in the aftermath of the atomic bomb
C. how to defeat Hitler and the Nazis
Answer: A
Explanation: Because after they defeated them they split them up but they didnt know what to do with them after that.
What are the pros and cons of Africa’s geography?
Answer:
Explanation:
The key factors explaining Africa's disadvantage at the firm level are lack of infrastructure, access to finance, and political competition.
Which major civilization developed in the region indicated on this map during
the classical era?
OA. Axum (Aksum)
OB. Chavín
OC. Bantu
OD. Olmec
← PREVIOUS
SUBMIT
In the region of the map highlighted, the major civilization that developed was A. Axum (Aksum).
Where was Aksum located?The Kingdom of Aksum was a major civilization that was located around modern-day Ethiopia.
They were a Christian Kingdom and fought against Muslim kingdoms that rose to prominence around their time.
Find out more on Aksum at https://brainly.com/question/16093848
#SPJ1
Which ideology is associated with the principle "from each according to ability, to each according to need"?
Capitalism
Mercantilism
Socialism
Communism
Answer:
Communism
Explanation:
In his 1875 Critique of the Gotha Programme, Karl Marx, the founder of communism, spread the slogan, "From each according to ability, to each according to need".
Answer:
Communism
Explanation:
Practical dissertation program in a research institution for 6 months for science students. Internship for management students in companies. Online internships programs are also available for computer science students.
A typical welfare (environmental) service provided by some research institutes includes the:
Practical dissertation programInternship for management students in companies.Online internships programsWhat is known as research institutes?This refers to the any research centre that is basically an establishment founded for doing research for the advancement of knowledge in any field of the universe.
It can also be defined as any research or science institute whether corporate or unincorporated that has the practicing of research, science or technology as a part of its activities.
In conclusion, the typical welfare (environmental) service provided by some research institutes includes the Practical dissertation program, Internship for management students in companies and Online internships programs.
Read more about research institutes
brainly.com/question/968894
#SPJ1
Which of the following examples of Aztec technology best demonstrates an understanding of complex mathematics?
A: Calendars
B: Bloodletting
C: Adobe
D: Craftsmen
Calendars, examples of Aztec technology, best demonstrates an understanding of complex mathematics. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is technology?
The term technology refers to the developed of new thing as easy to human life. The technology advanced with help of scientifically solution and industrial method based. The technology based on invention of new object and innovation of new transform and advanced basis. The technology are fulfilled basic necessity of life.
During the Aztec period, the degree of understanding was complicated mathematics. The Aztecs are also known as the Aztlan people. The sophisticated calendar is useful for medicine, learning, and remembering everything. The Aztec technology was the beneficial to the people.
Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on technology, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15059972
#SPJ5
How did the protestant faith come to dominate the English colonies?
Protestant faith came to dominate the English colonies because Henry VIII introduced a new state religion to the English.
How did the Protestant faith spread to England?Henry VIII was the first monarch to introduce a new state religion to the English. In 1532, he wanted to have his marriage to his wife, Catherine of Aragon, annulled. When Pope Clement VII refused to consent to the annulment, Henry VIII decided to separate the entire country of England from the Roman Catholic Church.
With this information, we can conclude that Henry VIII had been a devout Catholic in his younger years. He had defended the Pope against the Protestant ideas published by Martin Luther, a German priest. In 1534, Henry declared that he, not the Pope, was the head of the Church in England. This sparked the English Reformation .
Learn more about Henry VIII in brainly.com/question/13515837
#SPJ1
Why did Cardinal Richelieu bring France into the Thirty Years War?
Answer:
His main foreign policy goal was to maintain French domination in the Thirty Years' War that swept Europe and to restrain the authority of the Austro-Spanish Habsburg dynasty.
How important was Cardinal Richelieu for the Thirty Years War?The Thirty Years War was transformed by Richelieu from being yet another conflict between Catholics and Protestants for control of the Holy Roman Empire to one between the Bourbons and the Hapsburgs for supremacy over all of Europe. He saw to guarantee that the conflict was limited to the Hapsburg realms, destroying the German lands (Germany had not yet achieved political unification for 200+ years), and sparing the lovely France. In 1618, "Germany" was in a unique condition of economic, cultural, and social dynamism, and the conflict had utterly destroyed numerous German cities. Siege operations brought Late Middle Ages cities like Magdeburg, which had thrived, to cannibalism. Mercenary troops that treated citizens with utter disdain and as objects of entertainment invaded Germany. Following the Thirty Years War, Germany's economy suffered while Louis XIV's France soared to perhaps its highest point of dominance. Churchill discusses how, throughout the Cromwellian era, Britain observed the loss of Spain as a significant adversary in international affairs and the rise of France as both a rival and the dominant force in military and cultural matters. Richelieu was a great master of long-term planning, and during the Thirty Years War, the Habsburg Empire started its long, sluggish fall. The Age of Kings by TimeLife from its "Great Ages of Man" Series is a nice and simple to read book on this subject. Although reading it while pretending to be a man could be beneficial.
Which artist blended the attention to detail of the Northern Renaissance with the attention to perspective and proportion of the Italian Renaissance?
A.
Jan van Eyck
B.
Albrecht Dürer
C.
Piero della Francesca
D.
Erasmus Grasser
Name three of the four main differences between a short story and a novel
Answer:
Short stories are shorter and have:
Limited characters
One main theme
One conflict
Novels are longer and have:
More characters
Multiple themes
Several conflicts
Explanation:
PENN FOSTER
Government implies the power of making laws. It is essential to the idea of a law, that it be attended with a sanction; or, in other words, a penalty or punishment for disobedience. If there be no penalty annexed to disobedience, the resolutions or commands which pretend to be laws will, in fact, amount to nothing more than advice or recommendation.
According to Hamilton, what was a failure of the Articles of Confederation that would be corrected by the new Constitution?
The government could not make laws under the Articles, but would be able to under the Constitution.
The government could make laws under the Articles, but would be able to enforce them under the Constitution.
The government could collect taxes under the Articles, but could now lawfully spend money under the Constitution.
The government could not collect taxes under the Articles, and would still not be able to under the Constitution.
According to Hamilton, a failure of the Articles of Confederation that would be corrected by the new Constitution is: B. the government could make laws under the Articles, but would be able to enforce them under the Constitution.
What is the Articles of Confederation?The Articles of Confederation are the first written documents that were regarded as the Constitution of the United States of America, which was agreed upon by the thirteen (13) original states.
Based on the excerpt from Hamilton, we can infer and logically deduce that the government has the power to make laws under the Articles, but would only be able to enforce these laws under the Constitution.
Read more on Articles of Confederation here: brainly.com/question/20812866
#SPJ1
Option B. According to the Hamilton the failure of the articles would be corrected based on the fact that The government could make laws under the Articles, but would be able to enforce them under the Constitution.
How did the article of confederation fail?The article failed because there were a lot of powers which the central government of the United States did not have.
In the articles, the states had more rights than the federal government hence the need for a constitution.
Read more on the articles of confederation here:
https://brainly.com/question/13152253
#SPJ1
20. why did navies create democracies
Well, democracy is a Greek-born concept.
So, When and why did democracy happen in ancient Greece?
To Give vs To Receive
There are several variations of democracy as it is used in various nations today. Democracy now has as many influences as there are varieties of bananas available on the market thanks to historical events and thinkers. But whenever academics discuss the beginnings of democracy, they always go back to the same location. They reflect on this amazing civilization known as Ancient Greece.
If you imagine democracy to be a legacy of one great philosopher among ancient Greeks, you are dead wrong. In fact famous philosophers like Aristotle and Plato had many objections to democratic governments. For Aristotle, ordinary people such as carpenters, soldiers, farmers, had too many things to do in a day, they cannot be expected to cultivate "virtues". Virtue, in the eyes of Aristotle, is the domain for the elite class. A sector of society with sufficient wealth and leisure time for whom to devote time and effort to cultivate virtue without material gain comes naturally. For Aristotle, states should be governed by such people. I wouldn't be surprised if the etymology of "Aristocrat" has to do with Aristotle.
Neither did Plato say anything better. In fact, monarchies, dictators, and despots would find in Plato their inspiration. Plato saw a government governed at the top by a philosopher-king to be the best. Just as a healthy and just body is governed by knowledge and reason, a healthy and just society is one governed by a "lover of knowledge", hence the philosopher-king.
Democracy was not an invention of a great mind. It was invented by lesser minds. It was invented by people with a "war-like" character, invented by Greek warriors. People who were bellicose and cocky. A class of people who were eager to win material gain by pillaging other towns. In ancient times, to make war with other states with the aim of material gain was how states pursued economic development. From this breed of people came a battle formation which is admired up to this day: the phalanx.
In a phalanx, the Greeks arrayed themselves in close rectangular formation. Because the terrain of Greece is rugged, one particular size became effective often. It was 20 x 15, twenty men across, 15 men deep. Do the math and you will see 20 x 15 = 300.
Given that an individual warrior had the minimum battle skills, the success of the Phalanx depended on its cohesion. It had to march and maneuver as a group. Its success depended on coordination. Attack as one, retreat as one when needed. It had to stay together no matter what. I hope, my friends, you can imagine how unnerving it might have been for untested warriors to man the front line of a Phalanx. But true to their character, with grit and valor they manned their places in the formation.
My friends, I hope you are still with me on this page because I haven't said yet how the Phalanx gave rise to democracy.
When the Greek warriors, coming from battles, marched back to their states they divided the loot among themselves. If they won against an invading army, each recounted his deeds in the battlefield in front of his comrades in a gathering possibly organized at night, around bonfires. But when it came to issues of state policies, each demanded a voice in government. Because, each contributed to the success of the Phalanx, it was only fitting that the voice of each be heard. The Greeks agreed, and so it was sealed.
"Awuuu, awuuu, awuuuuuu", they said.
Phalanx gave rise to Democracy. It was put together by a class of men who from the standpoint of philosophers were lesser minds. But because ancient Greek warriors gave so much for the Phalanx to succeed, their voices were heard in government. They gave, and a lot they did.
Democracy was born in Athens between 700 BC and 500 BC..
My dear friends, let us look at our democracy now. Today the only righteous mind to keep in modern society, it seems, is the one that listens to the people. To listen to that sector of society we call the masses.
During the infancy of democracy, ancient Greek warriors gave a lot to their city-states which in turn won them a voice in government. But today, moral philosophy compels us to do differently. In modern democracy, moral philosophy compels governments to listen to the voice of the masses. But listen closely and you will hear it distinctly. Give us!
Where as, the ethical system of ancient Greek warriors compelled them to give in order to be heard, the ethical system of modern democracy compels the state to listen to those whose only longing is to receive. To give to the masses whose voice is one. Give us!
Who opposed U.S. involvement in World War I and why?
To ensure the independence of the branches, who should select the members of each department (branch)
according to Madison? Why?
The members of each branch according to Madison, should be selected by the independent bodies.
What did Madison think about making branches to be genuinely separate?He stated that every department must have a will of its own and each branch of government should not be involved in the appointment of the members of the other branches.
Also, he talked about checks and balances so that ambition counteracts ambition and also divided the legislative branch to make it not too connected with each other that might weaken it.
Hence, themembers of each branch according to Madison, should be selected by the independent bodies.
Read more about James Madison
brainly.com/question/27887267
#SPJ1
Analyzing Sources
For this task, you will be reading and analyzing two articles on the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. The first article is about The 1968 Democratic Convention and its bosses, and the second is about Letter from National Mobilization Committee to End the War on Vietnam. Before reading either document, read through the instructions below.
Part A
Read each document and take notes on the key information in that document. Enter your notes in the appropriate table below.
Note: if a piece of information is not available, add "n.a." or "not found."
(There is two articles Someone already did article A but I need someone to help me out on Article B
Based on the above, the author is Haynes Johnson, 1968 Democratic Convention.
Yes, it's a magazine.This occurred at the International Amphitheatre. The majority of the doors, which were previously part of a White House porch and were sculptural, were discovered by conference attendees to be bulletproof. A wire-topped steel barrier surrounded the hall itself. The Secret Service agents and security guards mixed with groups of armed and armored police inside the gate.He said that many people were angry.A major event that prevented this idea from realizing its full potential was the massive eruption of the Vietnam War and American engagement in it.Convention attendees reportedly witnessed this at the International Amphitheatre when they noticed that the White House porch's front doors, which were sculptural, had been bulletproofed. A steel fence and wire were used to enclose the hall.
The Vietnam War, which started on a large scale and which the United States became involved in, was a major event that prevented this idea from going into a full golden age.
The purpose of the Democratic National Convention is to choose a candidate to represent the Democratic Party as vice president and to run for president of the United States.
A number of presidential nomination gatherings that take place every four years are referred to as the Democratic National Convention.
.
To know more about National Convention refer to: https://brainly.com/question/23573876
#SPJ1