The stadium capacity allows for players, radio and newspaper reporters, and stadium workers in addition to spectators. How many of these people could be at a game?

The initial deposit needed for the account is given as follows:

$19,257.37.

The amount of money earned, in compound interest, after t years, is given by:

[tex]A(t) = P\left(1 + \frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}[/tex]

In which:

The parameters for this problem are given as follows:

[tex]A = 22000, t = 3, r = 0.0447, n = 4[/tex]

Hence the initial deposit P is obtained as follows:

[tex]A(t) = P\left(1 + \frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}[/tex]

[tex]22000 = P\left(1 + \frac{0.0447}{4}\right)^{4 \times 3}[/tex]

1.142657P = 22000

P = 22000/1.142657

P = $19,257.37.

More can be learned about compound interest at https://brainly.com/question/24274034

#SPJ1

Answer:

Since the line is vertical and passes through the point (3, -5), it is a vertical line with undefined slope.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The equation for those inputs and outputs is:
0.25 *input - 151.75 = Output  

Step-by-step explanation:

For this, first search for the Slope of the funtion
THe slope can be found by calculating this :
(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)  or in this case (output2 - output1)/ (input2 - input1)

IT continues as follows:
( -48.5 - 24)  / (-413 - (-703) ) =
= (-72.5) / (290)
= -0.25

The slope is -0.25. If the function is a line then the equation is

-0.25*input + B = output

with any of the choices we can determine B.
  -0.25 * (-703) + B    = 24

   175.75 + B              = 24
175.75 +B - 175.75    = 24 - 175.75

               B                 = - 151.75

The equation for those inputs and outputs is:
0.25 *input - 151.75 = Output  

The correct expression which is not a rational expression,

⇒ (x+3)(2x-1) / (x+3)

We have to given that;

All the expressions are,

⇒ (x+3)(2x-1) / (x+3)

⇒ (3x²+3x) / (4x+5)

⇒ (3x+4√x-7) / (2x+2)

⇒ (2x²-3x³+5) / 5x

Since, A number which can be written in the form of fraction p / q , where q is non zero, are called Rational numbers.

Hence, We can simplify all the expressions as,

⇒ (x+3)(2x-1) / (x+3)

⇒ (2x - 1)

Hence, It is not a rational expression.

⇒ (3x²+3x) / (4x+5)

⇒ 3x (x + 1) / (4x + 5)

Hence, It is a rational expression.

⇒ (3x+4√x-7) / (2x+2)

⇒ (3x + 4√x - 7) / 2 (x + 1)

Hence, It is a rational expression.

⇒ (2x²-3x³+5) / 5x

Hence, It is a rational expression.

Thus, The correct expression which is not a rational expression,

⇒ (x+3)(2x-1) / (x+3)

Learn more about the rational numbers visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12088221

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:181,250

Step-by-step explanation:

Basically, the cost would go up 5 percent, and you’re asking how much it would go up in 5 years. So 5x5=25, so you’d multiply 145,000 by 25%, which is 36,250. So, you’d add that to 145,000 which would get you 181,250.

The expression that is a factor of both x² - 9 and x² + 8x + 15 is (x + 3).

Given the polynomials in the question:

x² - 9

x² + 8x + 15

To find a factor that is common to both x² - 9 and x² + 8x + 15, we can factorize the two expressions and look for any common factors.

First, factorize x² - 9:

Using the difference of sqaure formula

a² - b² = ( a + b )( a - b )

x² - 9

x² - 3² = (x - 3)(x + 3)

Next, factorize x² + 8x + 15:

Using AC method

( x + 3 )( x + 5 )

From the factorizations, we can see that both expressions have a common factor of (x + 3).

Learn more about factorisation here: brainly.com/question/20293447

#SPJ1

The absolute error is $1825, the relative error is 2

An absolute error is a determinant of how large an error is. A relative error defines how good or bad an error is.

The formula for determining an absolute error is;

The formula for determining a relative error is:

From the parameters given:

The absolute error can be computed as:

Absolute error = 2559 - (2559 - 1825)

Absolute error = 2559 - 734

Absolute error = $1825

The relative error = 1825 ÷ 734

The relative error = 2.4

The relative error ≅ 2 (as an integer)

Learn more about absolute error and relative error here:

brainly.com/question/15114851

brainly.com/question/64815

No, I disagree because a good line of fit has to minimize the sum of the squared distance between all the points in the data.

A line of fit is used to mathematically model the relationship between variables in a data. A line of fit is drawn such that the best line would minimize the sum of the squared distances between the plotted points.

This means that, the line of fit should not aim to go through the middle of the data points but minimize the sum of the squared distances between them.

Hence, Alfred's reasoning is Incorrect .

Learn more on line of fit ; https://brainly.com/question/17013321

#SPJ1

The percentage of buyers who paid between 150,000 and 153,300 is approximately 68% + 2.5% = 70.5%.

To solve this problem, we can use the properties of the normal distribution and the empirical rule (also known as the 68-95-99.7 rule) to estimate the percentage of buyers who paid between 150,000 and 153,300.

According to the empirical rule, given a normal distribution:

approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean approximately 95% of the  three standard deviations of the mean, the data are contained.

In this case, we want to find the percentage of buyers who paid between 150,000 and 153,300, which is one interval of length 3300 above the mean. To use the empirical rule, we need to standardize this interval by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation:

z1 = (150,000 - 150,000) / 1100 = 0

z2 = (153,300 - 150,000) / 1100 = 3

Here, z1 represents the number of standard deviations between 150,000 and the mean, and z2 represents the number of standard deviations between 153,300 and the mean.

Since the interval we are interested in is within three standard deviations of the mean (z2 <= 3), we can use the empirical rule to estimate the percentage of buyers who paid between 150,000 and 153,300:

Approximately 68% of the buyers paid within one standard deviation of the mean, which is between 149,000 and 151,000 (using z-scores of -1 and 1).

Approximately 95% of the buyers paid within two standard deviations of the mean, which is between 148,000 and 152,000 (using z-scores of -2 and 2).

Therefore, the remaining percentage of buyers who paid between 152,000 and 153,300 is approximately (100% - 95%) / 2 = 2.5%.

So, the percentage of buyers who paid between 150,000 and 153,300 is approximately 68% + 2.5% = 70.5%.

For such more questions on percentage

https://brainly.com/question/27210997

#SPJ11

The vendor sold 142 sodas and 91 hotdogs.

According to the question:

The vendor sold 233 sodas and hotdogs combined

The number of hot dogs sold was 51 less number of sodas sold

To find:

Number of sodas sold(S)

Number of hotdogs sold(H)

From the question, it is clear that:

S + H = 233 ...(i)

S - H = 51 ...(ii)

These two are simultaneous linear equations.

Adding equations (i) and (ii):

S + H + S - H = 233 + 51

2S = 284

S = 284/2

S = 142

Substitute this value of S in equation (i):

142 + H = 233

H = 233 - 142

H = 91

Therefore, the vendor sold 142 sodas and 91 hotdogs.

Read more about simultaneous linear equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/30293776

The cruise ship will travel approximately 15 nautical miles in 345 minutes.

Use a proportion to solve this problem. Let "d" be the number of nautical miles the cruise ship will travel in 345 minutes. Then:

19 nautical miles / 437 minutes = d nautical miles / 345 minutes

To solve for "d", cross-multiply:

19 nautical miles x 345 minutes = d nautical miles x 437 minutes

Then, divide both sides by 437 minutes to isolate "d":

d nautical miles = (19 nautical miles x 345 minutes) / 437 minutes

Simplifying this expression, we get:

d nautical miles = 15 nautical miles (rounded to the nearest whole number)

Therefore, the cruise ship will travel approximately 15 nautical miles in 345 minutes.

learn more about nautical miles: https://brainly.com/question/17038309

#SPJ1

The value of side TS is,

⇒ TS = 28

First, we are going to divide the figure and named new points X and Y as:

Now, we know that TS is the sum of TX and XS.

TS = TX + XS

Additionally, TX has the same length of HJ, so:

TX = HJ = 14

Now, we want to know the length of YK, and we can calculate it using the following equation:

LK = LY + YK

LY = HJ,

so, LY = 14

And, 42 = 14 + YK

42 - 14 = YK

28 = YK

Finally, since T and S are midpoints, the length of XS is the half of the length of YK. It means that XS is:

XS = YK/2

XS = 28/2

XS = 14

Therefore, TS is equal to:

TS = TX + XS

TS = 14 + 14

TS = 28

Learn more about trapezoid visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1410008

#SPJ1

The statement "x + 3 is a factor of p(x) = [tex]x^3 - 7x^2 + 15x - 9[/tex]" is false.

To determine whether x + 3 is a factor of p(x) = [tex]x^3 - 7x^2 + 15x - 9[/tex], we can use the factor theorem.

According to the factor theorem, if a polynomial p(x) has a factor (x - a), then p(a) = 0.

In this case, we have x + 3 as a possible factor. To check if it is indeed a factor, we substitute -3 for x in the polynomial p(x):

[tex]p(-3) = (-3)^3 - 7(-3)^2 + 15(-3) - 9[/tex]

= -27 - 63 - 45 - 9

= -144

Since p(-3) is not equal to zero, we conclude that x + 3 is not a factor of p(x).

Therefore, the statement "x + 3 is a factor of [tex]p(x) = x^3 - 7x^2 + 15x - 9[/tex]" is false.

for such more question on factor

https://brainly.com/question/25829061

#SPJ11

The difference of medians is given as follows:

2.

A box and whisker plots shows these five metrics from a data-set, listed and explained as follows:

The median for each day is given as follows:

Hence the difference is given as follows:

8 - 6 = 2.

The box plot is given by the image presented at the end of the answer.

More can be learned about box plots at https://brainly.com/question/3473797

#SPJ1

We have that Linda's net and expression incorrect.

Now, With the Expression of the surface area of attic

45 (40 + 25 + 25) + 1/2 (40 x 15)

Hence, Surface area is,

X = 4050 + 600

X = 4650 feet²

Hence, The answer is No, Because Her expression for the triangles are incorrect;

1/2(40 x 15)

Instead of,

1/2 x 40 x 15

Hence, Linda's net and expression incorrect,

Learn more about the triangle visit;

brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ1

Complete question is,

Linda is adding padding to all of the surfaces inside her attic for extra warmth in the winter.

She needs to find the approximate surface area of the attic, including the walls, floor, and ceiling. The attic is in the shape of a triangular prism. Linda draws the net and writes the expression below to represent the surface area of the attic. Are Linda's net and expression correct?

The value of a is given as follows:

a = 2.

The rate of change is given as follows:

2.4 inches per hour.

The slope-intercept equation for a linear function is presented as follows:

y = mx + b

In which:

The line passes through the points (–1, –5) and (4, 5), hence the slope m is obtained as follows:

m = (5 - (-5))/(4 - (-1))

m = 2.

Hence:

y = 2x + b.

When x = -1, y = -5, hence the intercept b is obtained as follows:

-5 = -2 + b

b = -3.

Hence:

y = 2x - 3.

Then the value of a is obtained as the value of x when y = 1, hence:

2x - 3 = 1

2x = 4

x = 2.

The rate of change in the snowfall is given as follows:

m = (8.1 - 2.3)/2

m = 2.4 inches per hour.

More can be learned about linear functions at https://brainly.com/question/15602982

#SPJ1

The critical values t₀ for a two-sample t-test is ± 2.0.6

To find the critical values t₀ for a two-sample t-test to test the claim that the population means are equal (i.e., µ₁ = µ₂), we need to use the following formula:

t₀ = ± t_(α/2, df)

where t_(α/2, df) is the critical t-value with α/2 area in the right tail and df degrees of freedom.

The degrees of freedom are calculated as:

df = (s₁²/n₁ + s₂²/n₂)² / [(s₁²/n₁)²/(n₁-1) + (s₂²/n₂)²/(n₂-1)]

n₁ = 14, n₂ = 12, X₁ = 6,X₂ = 7, s₁ = 2.5 and s₂ = 2.8

α = 0.05 (two-tailed)

First, we need to calculate the degrees of freedom:

df = (s₁²/n₁ + s₂²/n₂)² / [(s₁²/n₁)²/(n₁-1) + (s₂²/n₂)²/(n₂-1)]

= (2.5²/14 + 2.8²/12)² / [(2.5²/14)²/13 + (2.8²/12)²/11]

= 24.27

Since this is a two-tailed test with α = 0.05, we need to find the t-value with an area of 0.025 in each tail and df = 24.27.

From a t-distribution table, we find:

t_(0.025, 24.27) = 2.0639 (rounded to four decimal places)

Finally, we can calculate the critical values t₀:

t₀ = ± t_(α/2, df) = ± 2.0639

To learn more on Statistics click:

https://brainly.com/question/30218856

#SPJ1

The solutions are : solution of the following system of equations are:

(- 1/2, 1/2)

(- 1, 2)

Here, we have,

The given system of equations is expressed as

y = 2x²- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1

y = - 3x - 1- - - - - - - - - -- - - -2

We would apply the method of substitution by substituting equation 1 into equation 2. It becomes

2x² = - 3x - 1

2x² + 3x + 1 = 0

We would find two numbers such that their sum or difference is 3x and their product is 2x².

The two numbers are 2x and x. Therefore,

2x² + 2x + x + 1 = 0

2x(x + 1) + 1(x + 1) = 0

2x + 1 = 0 or x + 1 = 0

x = - 1/2 or x = - 1

Substituting x = - 1/2 into equation 1, it becomes

y = 2(-1/2)² = 1/2

Substituting x = - 1 into equation 1, it becomes

y = 2(-1)² = 2

Hence, The solutions are : solution of the following system of equations are:

(- 1/2, 1/2)

(- 1, 2)

To learn more on equation click:

brainly.com/question/24169758

#SPJ1

The value of the home after 5 years would be $194,415.

How to calculate the value of the home after 5 years

First, let's calculate the increase in value for each 3-year period:

After the first 3 years:

Increase = 9% of $150,000 = 0.09 * $150,000 = $13,500

After the second 3 years:

Increase = 9% of ($150,000 + $13,500) = 0.09 * ($150,000 + $13,500) = $14,850

After the third 3 years:

Increase = 9% of ($150,000 + $13,500 + $14,850) = 0.09 * ($150,000 + $13,500 + $14,850) = $16,065

Now, let's add these increases to the initial value of the home to find the value after 5 years:

Value after 5 years = $150,000 + $13,500 + $14,850 + $16,065 = $194,415

Therefore, the value of the home after 5 years would be $194,415.

Learn more about future value at https://brainly.com/question/30390035

#SPJ1

Answer: Tommy's sister is four meters away from him.

Step-by-step explanation:

If Tommy's older brother is 4 meters ahead and he is 5 meters from his sister,subtract 1 from that since it is described she is right next to him,and you get four.

This is my first time answering anyone so I hope it helps.

The algebraic equation of the cubic function set on Cartesian plane is f(x) = (x + 6) · (x - 1) · (x - 4). (Correct choice: 3)

In this problem we find the representation of a cubic function set on Cartesian plane, whose definition as algebraic equation is shown below:

f(x) = a · (x - r₁) · (x - r₂) · (x - r₃)

Where:

Graphically speaking, the roots of the polynomials are the points of the curve on x-axis. If we know that a = 1, r₁ = - 6, r₂ = 1 and r₃ = 4, then the algebraic equation of the cubic function is:

f(x) = (x + 6) · (x - 1) · (x - 4)

To learn more on cubic equations: https://brainly.com/question/13730904

#SPJ1

Answer:

3)  f(x) = (x - 4)(x - 1)(x + 6)

Step-by-step explanation:

The x-intercepts of a function are the points at which the curve crosses the x-axis, so when f(x) = 0.

From inspection of the given graph, the curve crosses the x-axis at:

According to the Factor Theorem, if f(x) is a polynomial and f(a) = 0, then (x - a) is a factor of f(x).

Therefore, as f(x) = 0 when x = -6, x = 1 and x = 4, then (x + 6) and (x - 1) and (x - 4) are factors of the polynomial.

Therefore, the equation of the function is:

The coordinates you would be standing on would be coordinate (-5.71, -3.57).

To discover the arrangement of point "K" that partitions the line section interfacing the beginning point to the coffee shop in a proportion of 5:2, we are able to utilize the concept of the area equation.

We should expect the starting point to be meant as A with orchestrates (- x1, - y1), and the café is implied as B with works with (- x2, - y2). The ratio of 5:2 suggests that segment AB is divided into two parts and five parts, each accounting for 7 percent of the length.

The x-direction of point K can be determined as:

xK = (5 * x2 + 2 * x1)/7

Basically, the y-direction of point K can be determined as:

yK = (5 * y2 + 2 * y1) / 7

Stopping within the arranges of the coffee shop (-8, -5) as (-x2, -y2) and accepting the beginning point as the beginning (0, 0), we have:

xK = (5 * (-8) + 2 * 0) / 7 = -40/7 ≈ -5.71

yK = (5 * (-5) + 2 * 0) / 7 = -25/7 ≈ -3.57

Hence, in case you stood on point K, you'd be around at coordinate (-5.71, -3.57).

Learn more about coordinates here:

https://brainly.com/question/17206319

#SPJ1

Answer:

X+2

Hope this helps

The perimeter of the dilated rectangle M'N'O'P' is 54 centimeters.

If the area of the original rectangle is A, and the area of the dilated rectangle is A', then the relationship between their areas is:

A' = k² × A

Similarly, the relationship between their perimeters is:

P' = k × P

The original rectangle has an area of 14 square centimeters.

The dilated rectangle has an area of 126 square centimeters.

We need to find the perimeter of the dilated rectangle.

Let's denote the scale factor as "k."

126 = k² × 14

Dividing both sides by 14, we get:

9 =  k²

k = 3

Now, we can find the perimeter of the dilated rectangle using the perimeter relationship:

P' = k × P

The original rectangle has a perimeter of 18 centimeters, so:

P' = 3 × 18

P' = 54 centimeters

To learn more on Perimeter click:

https://brainly.com/question/7486523

#SPJ1

The area of the sector is: 21) 177.0 cm² 22) 58.6 in.²

The missing sides are: 23) 12     24) 8

The area of the sector of any circle is given as:

Area = ∅/360 * πr², where r is the radius.

21. ∅ = 120°

r = 13 cm

Substitute:

Area = 120/360 * π * 13² = 177.0 cm²

22. ∅ = 105°

r = 8 in.

Substitute:

Area = 105/360 * π * 8² = 58.6 in.²

Since the lines appear tangents in the circles given, then the triangle formed is a right triangle, therefore, we will apply the Pythagorean Theorem in each case:

23. Missing side = √[(9 + 6)² - 9²]

Missing side = 12

24. Let the missing side be x. Therefore, we have:

12 + x = √(16² + 12²)

12 + x = 20

12 + x - 12 = 20 - 12

x = 8

Learn more about area of sector on:

https://brainly.com/question/22972014

#SPJ1

The perimeter of rectangle M'N'O'P' is given as follows:

54 cm.

A dilation can be defined as a transformation that multiplies the distance between every point in an object and a fixed point, called the center of dilation, by a constant factor called the scale factor.

The ratio between the areas is given as follows:

126/14 = 9.

The area is measure in square units, while the perimeter is measured in units, hence the ratio of the perimeters is the square root of the ratio of the areas, that is:

3.

Hence the perimeter of rectangle M'N'O'P' is given as follows:

3 x 18 = 54 cm.

The complete problem is:

Rectangle MNOP has a perimeter of 18 cm and an area of 14 cm2. After rectangle MNOP is dilated, rectangle M'N'O'P' has an area of 126 cm2. What is the perimeter of rectangle M'N'O'P'?

More can be learned about dilation at brainly.com/question/3457976

#SPJ1

The correct description of the shape of the distribution is D. Roughly Symmetric.

Symmetric distribution is an often-referenced term in statistics, representing a type of probability with data segments evenly dispersed around the mean. This denotes the perfect mirror image of the right and left halves when the distribution is split; arriving at an equal size and shape on either side when drawn at the midpoint of the line.

Looking at the distribution of a fire department's response time, we can see that the distribution is roughly symmetric because the values on the left seem to match those on the right.

Find out more on symmetric distributions at https://brainly.com/question/12739688

#SPJ1

The expected value of the car 7 years after it was purchased is $47,029.12.

To solve this problem, we need to calculate the expected value of the car after 7 years. To do this, we need to use the formula for calculating the value of a depreciating asset:

Value after n years = Initial Value - (Initial Value × (Depreciation Rate/100)×n)

In this case, the initial value of the car is $54792, the depreciation rate is 19%, and n = 7. Thus, the expected value of the car 7 years after it was purchased is:

Value after 7 years = 54792 - (54792 × (19/100)×7)

Value after 7 years = 54792 - (54792 × 0.19×7)

Value after 7 years = 54792 - 7762.88

Value after 7 years = $47,029.12

Therefore, the expected value of the car 7 years after it was purchased is $47,029.12.

Learn more about the exponential decay here:

https://brainly.com/question/13674608.

#SPJ1

Example: (2x - 4) x=7 so (2x (x=7) - 4) =18