What is 817x45 in standerd algorithm pls help

Answer:

b

i did this before xD

Answer:

I think question is incomplete . So I can't give answer.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

d-7

Answer:

put each a= number in the place of (a) in the big circle the tiny 2 means to the 2nd power ( the number times itself) .. so you use the small circle a=3 then 3² -7 = 2 meaning 3x3=9 and then 9-7=2 so the answer for that small circle is 2 and then repeat for each small circle

Answer:

incorrect

Step-by-step explanation:

this is incorrect because i solved it and i didn't got that answer

hope this helps:)

Pls mark brainlist

Answer:

Explanation:

-2j - 10 = -6

−2j − 10 + 10 = −6 + 10

−2j = 4

-2j / -2 = 4 / -2

Answer: it is a reflection across the x-axis sorry if I responded late

Step-by-step explanation:

no 2 is more than -5 because 2 is positive but -5 is negative

Answer: 38 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes, there is very clear evidence to suggest or show a correlation between

watercolour and each animal's response to the water as well as their total responses.

Explanation

When the water was blue, the total water consumed by both animals came to 1410 ml. The dog consumed more water than the cat. The dog drank 1200 ml while the cat drank just 410 ml.

When the color of the water was changed to green, the animals drank a total of 1300 ml. The cat drank 200 ml while the dog drank 1100 ml.

We can thus,  establish that there is an association between the color of the water and the volume of water taken by each animal because on the whole, both animals seem to prefer blue water. They drank more water when its color was blue and less when it was red.

Please see the attached document.

Cheers

Answer:

I think its A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Putag Ina mo 1 +1

Step-by-step explanation:

Jajajjsjdjfufyfuchdkdc

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

19-6

Answer:

Raul is 13 years old

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

LOOK

Step-by-step explanation:

Because of the communitve property of addtion which states that

x+y=y+x

In the addition table

5+9 is equal to 9+5 and both equal 14

Answer:

x=35°

Step-by-step explanation:

145°+110°+70°=325°

360°-325°=35°

Answer:

204.4 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Given data

we are told that on the map the distance is 14.6cm

scale

1cm=14miles

hence if

        1cm represents 14miles

then  14.6 cm will be x

cross multiply

x= 14.6*14

x=204.4 miles

Hence the distance is 204.4 miles

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation

A

Answer:

Do not trust his answer!! its B

Step-by-step explanation:

I did this question and i picked A because the other person said too but it was wrong

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.15=3/20

0.15/1

0.15x100=15 divide by 5

1x100=100 divide by 5

3 over 20

0.369=369/1000

0.369/1

0.369x1000=369 divide 1

1x1000=1000 divide 1

369 over 1000

Answer:

$48.60

it would cost up to that much because

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The amount of water in the mix is 2/(5+2) = 2/7 of the volume of the mix. That amount is ...

  (2/7)(21 liters) = 6 liters

Then the other 21-6 = 15 liters are antifreeze.

A) To make the mix 1 : 1, 15-6 = 9 liters of water need to be added.

__

B) To make the mix 1 : 2, The total amount of water needs to be brought to 30 liters. 15 more liters need to be added for a total of 24 added liters of water.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The family’s leaders have pulled off three of the great marketing triumphs of the modern era: The first is selling OxyContin; the second is promoting the Sackler name; and the third is ensuring that, as far as the public is aware, the first and the second have nothing to do with one another.

To the extent that the Sacklers have cultivated a reputation, it’s for being earnest healers, judicious stewards of scientific progress, and connoisseurs of old and beautiful things. Few are aware that during the crucial period of OxyContin’s development and promotion, Sackler family members actively led Purdue’s day-to-day affairs, filling the majority of its board slots and supplying top executives. By any assessment, the family’s leaders have pulled off three of the great marketing triumphs of the modern era: The first is selling OxyContin; the second is promoting the Sackler name; and the third is ensuring that, as far as the public is aware, the first and the second have nothing to do with one another.

If you head north on I-95 through Stamford, Connecticut, you will spot, on the left, a giant misshapen glass cube. Along the building’s top edge, white lettering spells out ONE STAMFORD FORUM. No markings visible from the highway indicate the presence of the building’s owner and chief occupant, Purdue Pharma.

Originally known as Purdue Frederick, the first iteration of the company was founded in 1892 on New York’s Lower East Side as a peddler of patent medicines. For decades, it sustained itself with sales of Gray’s Glycerine Tonic, a sherry-based liquid of “broad application” marketed as a remedy for everything from anemia to tuberculosis. The company was purchased in 1952 by Arthur Sackler, thirty-nine, and was run by his brothers, Mortimer, thirty- six, and Raymond, thirty-two. The Sackler brothers came from a family of Jewish immigrants in Flatbush, Brooklyn. Arthur was a headstrong and ambitious provider, setting the tone—and often choosing the path—for his younger brothers. After attending medical school on Arthur’s dime, Mortimer and Raymond followed him to jobs at the Creedmoor psychiatric hospital in Queens. There, they coauthored more than one hundred studies on the biochemical roots of mental illness. The brothers’ research was promising—they were among the first to identify a link between psychosis and the hormone cortisone—but their findings were mostly ignored by their professional peers, who, in keeping with the era, favored a Freudian model of mental illness.

Concurrent with his psychiatric work, Arthur Sackler made his name in pharmaceutical advertising, which at the time consisted al

Answer:

she/se jajdjgdgmggdukhmijauuuu

Step-by-step explanation:

jkiek3ke

Answer:

x = 30

Step-by-step explanation:

So, you want to get 'x' by itself

0.25x + 7.5 = 15

           - 7.5   -7.5

0.25x = 7.5

---------   ------

0.25     0.25

x = 30

Answer:

(0,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C : JK is longer than JL.

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use the pythagorean theorem to solve this question, if we think of lines JK and JL as hypotenuse lengths. Triangle JK has side lengths of 5 and 5. Triangle JL has side lengths of 1 and 5. JK is longer than JL.

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

use the distance formula d= [tex]\sqrt (x2-x1)2+(y2-y1)2[/tex]

The distance of J to K is 6.403124

The distance of J to L is 5.09902

Answer:

Inequality Form: X=<5/2

Interval Notation:(−∞,5/2)

i hope it helps

Answer: Literally has to be 3830.7

Step-by-step explanation: If the money is compounded annually there has to be some sort of accumulation or increase in the account

Answer:

Yes, I agree

Step-by-step explanation:

For the cubic function

A cubic function is represented as:

[tex]f(x)=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d[/tex]

A cubic function may have 1, 2 or 3 x intercepts. This is shown below

For 3 x intercepts

[tex]y = x^3 - x[/tex]

Equate y to 0

[tex]x^3 - x = 0[/tex]

Expand

[tex]x(x^2 - 1) = 0[/tex]

Express [tex]x^2 - 1[/tex] as difference of two squares

[tex]x(x - 1)(x +1 ) = 0[/tex]

x = 0 or 1 or -1

For 2 x intercepts

[tex]y = x^3 - x[/tex]

[tex]y =(x-5)^2)(x+7)[/tex]

Equate y to 0

[tex](x-5)^2(x+7) = 0[/tex]

Expand

[tex](x-5)(x-5)(x+7) = 0[/tex]

x= 5 or x = -7

For 1 x intercept

[tex]y = x^3[/tex]

Equate y to 0

[tex]x^3 = 0[/tex]

Take cube roots of both sides

[tex]x = 0[/tex]

It has been shown above that a cubic function may have 1, 2 or 3.

So, I agree to the statement

For the quadratic function

A quadratic function will not have any x intercept when the function can not be factorized;

E.g.

[tex]y = x^2 + x + 17[/tex]

The above function has no x intercept.

A quadratic function will have at least 1 x intercept when the function can be factorized;

E.g.

[tex]y = x^2- 6x + 9[/tex]

Equate y to 0

[tex]x^2- 6x + 9 = 0[/tex]

Expand

[tex]x^2 - 3x - 3x + 9 = 0[/tex]

[tex](x - 3)(x-3) = 0[/tex]

[tex]x = 3[/tex]

We've shown that a quadratic may have no x intercept, and it may also have x intercept(s)

Hence, I agree to both statement