what is the meaning of exclaimed​

The way by which the author establishes and advances the association between Maggie and her mother would be:

B). The discourse in Maggie’s letter to her mother.

Thus, option B is the correct answer.

Learn more about 'Maggie' here:

brainly.com/question/4486662

Explanation:

The following would be how the author creates and strengthens the connection between Maggie and her mother:

B). The discourse in Maggie’s letter to her mother. 

Through the contact that is detailed in the letter that Maggie wrote to her mother, the author strengthens the bond that exists between Maggie and her mother.

The letter makes clear that Maggie is very upset and sad by the fact that her mother had abandoned her and left her to fight on her own.

This demonstrates how their relationship has grown bitter, sad, and angry as a result of the distance as she yearned for her mother's love and attention.

As a result, choice B is the right response.

Answer:

a tour guide or a translator

Explanation:

yes i still want to do that but I'm into linguistics and phonetics now.

Answer:

when I was younger I wanted to be a surgeon, now I want to be a psychologist

Answer:

Because if they didnt wear uniforms they would be judged  by their clotheing and if they did wear uniform they wouldnt be judge and thats why schools tell them to wear uniforms and if we didnt wear them some would wear innerpropriate clothes so this is why we wear uniforms.

Explanation:  Can i have brainliest?

Answer:

 Some schools have a policy stating that students must wear uniforms to class. Normally associated with private schools, uniforms have become more common in public schools, too. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, uniforms are required at about 22% of U.S. public schools.

Uniforms vary widely by school. Some are quite formal requiring dress shirts and ties for boys and jumpers or dresses for girls. Others are little more than a sweat shirt emblazoned with the school's logo. Some schools offer a wide range of options and colors for uniforms like khaki or navy dress slacks easily found at most department or big box stores. Other schools require students purchase clothing from an official school store or uniform supplier. It's not just private schools that require uniforms. Many public schools also require them from kindergarten through grade 12.

School uniforms can also increase student safety. Students cannot wear gang-affiliated clothing or colors if specific uniforms are required. Individual style, in this case, is sacrificed for a safer learning environment. Even something as simple as a teacher being easily able to spot her students on a field trip or spot an intruder in the school is another important benefit of school uniforms.

School uniforms make it easier on families to shop for school clothes. Uniforms are usually cheaper than other clothing and not having to decide what to wear saves time.

Within the pros and cons of school uniforms, increasing self-confidence when students don't feel pressured to wear certain types of clothing is an intrinsic value of a uniform policy. Uniforms also make it almost harder for students to be bullied over clothing choices. Studies have shown that middle school students often felt safer and more confident when wearing uniforms.

Explanation:

Explanation:

The plane was able to take off once the runway was clear

In the poem, My Old Man, by Charles Bukowski, the speaker is a disturbed man. At only sixteen years old, he is already into drinking alcohol as a means of coping with depression and abusive father.

hope it helps

Answer:

Hope this is alright

Explanation:

On her way to the planetary camp, Aries Spring has her bag snatched at the spaceport, but fellow student Kanata Hoshijima stops him. Nine students from Caird High School arrive at the planet McPa for their planetary camp. Not long after setting foot, a mysterious sphere appears out of nowhere and swallows up the students. They end up adrift in space where they find an abandoned spaceship. Everybody except Aries makes it on board. At the risk of running out of fuel and also ending up lost in space, Kanata goes out and rescues Aries. Kanata runs out of fuel, but the other students form a human ladder to rescue Kanata and Aries. With everybody safely on board the spaceship, the students introduce themselves to each other, and Zack Walker learns that the sphere transported them 5012 light years away from home. As paranoia sets in realizing that the trip is impossible with the limited resources they have, the mood changes when Kanata inspires them to have hope, telling them how he was in a similar situation in a hiking trip where his teacher died in an accident and he had to help his classmates survive seven days in the wilderness. In addition, Zack finds planets the students can resupply on and a route to get back. The students unanimously nominate Kanata as the captain and name the spaceship the Astra after seeing the phrase Per Aspera ad Astra on a plaque inside the spaceship.

I hope it is true

I hope it is true

I hope it is true Personally, I think, science fiction is a bridge between realism and imagined future. As Le Guin states, I do agree that science fiction is descriptive because its story background and topic actually comes from the present, and we can easily find the existing analog for the fiction creation in reality. Also, even for an inexistent creation, it still needs a lot of scientific knowledge background as a backup to support the logic and development of the plot. Another charm of sci-fi is because it gives another view for humans to think of themselves. How humans react under the extreme situation and how they use knowledge, courage and love to get escaped from such events, provides a condition for humans to reflect on themselves. This is why I don’t agree that reading science fiction is escapism. I think actually this is another way to face the fact and inform us a possibility that many creatures which are

Answer:

Comparison in writing discusses elements that are similar, while contrast in writing discusses elements that are different. A compare-and-contrast essay, then, analyzes two subjects by comparing them, contrasting them, or both.The key to a good compare-and-contrast essay is to choose two or more subjects that connect in a meaningful way. The purpose of conducting the comparison or contrast is not to state the obvious but rather to illuminate subtle differences or unexpected similarities. For example, if you wanted to focus on contrasting two subjects you would not pick apples and oranges; rather, you might choose to compare and contrast two types of oranges or two types of apples to highlight subtle differences. For example, Red Delicious apples are sweet, while Granny Smiths are tart and acidic. Drawing distinctions between elements in a similar category will increase the audience’s understanding of that category, which is the purpose of the compare-and-contrast essay.

Explanation:

Similarly, to focus on comparison, choose two subjects that seem at first to be unrelated. For a comparison essay, you likely would not choose two apples or two oranges because they share so many of the same properties already. Rather, you might try to compare how apples and oranges are quite similar. The more divergent the two subjects initially seem, the more interesting a comparison essay will be.Comparing and contrasting is also an evaluative tool. In order to make accurate evaluations about a given topic, you must first know the critical points of similarity and difference. Comparing and contrasting is a primary tool for many workplace assessments. You have likely compared and contrasted yourself to other colleagues. Employee advancements, pay raises, hiring, and firing are typically conducted using comparison and contrast. Comparison and contrast could be used to evaluate companies, departments, or individuals.

Answer:

Because it covers so much territory, the plain gives Europe the lowest average elevation of any continent

Explanation:

Answer:

kkkkk

bbbb

nnnnn

Answer:

Did you do

Went

You enjoyed

Was

Did you sit

Brought

You pay

Did not buy

Had

Explanation:

The correct responses of the simple past are Did you do, Went, You enjoyed, Was, Did you sit, Brought, You pay, did not buy and Had.

The fundamental past tense in Modern English is the simple past, often known as the past simple, past indefinite, or preterit. Despite having various other purposes, its primary function is to narrate previous occurrences.

The conversation that correctly makes the use of the simple past tense are mentioned are as follows:-

Therefore, the past form is correctly used in the above sentences.

Learn more about past tense here:

https://brainly.com/question/29757932

#SPJ2

Answer:

By looking at how it helps them achieve a goal correctly or does the job very well.

Explanation:

Answer:

How to Identify a Hero. ...

Heroes are often of obscure or mysterious origin. ...

Heroes are neither fools nor invincible. ...

Heroes are called upon to make a journey or to follow a goal or quest. ...

The heroes' ways are not always direct or clear to the heroes. ...

The heroes' ways are beset with dangers, loneliness, and temptation.

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes there is

I think that a metaphor can be found in the last stanza.  There, Kipling says

If you can fill the unforgiving minute

With sixty seconds' worth of distance run

He is using running as a metaphor for life.  He is saying that you have to try your hardest all the time, even if it leaves you exhausted, which is what running does

Answer:

three people were taken in the hospital

Explanation:

Answer:

WTH

Explanation:

The answer for what is sport is a Physical activity.

Answer:

too much love ?

Explanation:

Answer:

Not seeing anything

Explanation:

Answer:

WHAT

Explanation:

Answer:

* Media has been a significant piece of our day by day lives. It completely affected our way of life in sure and negative manners. There are such countless positive effects of web-based media on our way of life.

* Web-based media expanded the associations among individuals and established a climate in which you can impart your insights, pictures and loads of stuff. Web-based media improved inventiveness and social mindfulness for our general public by associating with others and imparting groundbreaking thoughts and insights. It is likewise significant for any business in light of the fact that eventually, you need to utilize online media in your business. Social media created global business and advertising. Individuals like to purchase stuff on the web.  Social Media made an occasion to extend your reality and make new companions from different nations. It is simpler to find out about breaking news via web-based media in light of the fact that it has limitless access and adaptability.

* Then again, Social media has impacted our way of life contrarily. Individuals can share anything they desire to via online media and some of them may be wrong pictures. Individuals has gotten more moderate about one another's perspective. Individuals began to contend about one another's viewpoint identified with political view, religion, social rights and culture. Web-based media had negative impact on youth. It diminished proactive tasks.

Explanation:

Individuals like to sit the entire day before PCs and talk. Web-based media likewise has impacted youth contrarily. Children may be influenced and controlled by certain destinations in which there is improper data.

The terrible piece of web-based media is that there is huge loads of superfluous data shared by individuals and furthermore tormenting and badgering via web-based media has been expanded. Individuals can offer ruthless and negative remarks about anything and anybody. Media has great, terrible and monstrous effects on our way of life.

Example 1 : Every day when I pick up my newspaper I read about crime. What strikes me as tragic in these discussions is that the solutions which are proposed are simply more of the same: bigger threats, more punishment. Few people ask more basic questions about whether punishment ought to be our main concern. Even fewer seem genuinely concerned about victims and what they need.

Consequently, victims’ needs and wishes continue to be ignored. Prisons are massively crowded, and the call for a return to the death penalty is back with a vengeance. The costs to us as taxpayers keep soaring.

Actually, there is good reason why we ignore victims and focus instead on more punishment for offenders. It has to do with our very definitions of what constitutes crime and what justice entails.

If you have been a victim, you know something about the fear, the anger, the shame, the sense of violation that this experience generates. You know something about the needs that result: needs for repayment, for a chance to talk, for support, for involvement, for an experience that feels like justice. Unfortunately, you may also know from personal experience how little help, information and involvement you can expect from the justice process.

If you have experienced crime, you know for a fact that you yourself are the victim, and you would like to be remembered in what happens thereafter. But the legal system does not define the offence that way and does not assume that you have a central role.

Legally, the essence of the crime lies in breaking a law rather than the actual damage done. More importantly, the official victim is the state, not you. It is no accident, then, that victims and their needs are so often forgotten: they are not even part of the equation, not part of the definition of the offence!

When a crime occurs, the state as victim decides what must be done, and the process of deciding focuses primarily on two questions: “Is the person guilty? If so, how much punishment does he or she deserve?” Our definitions of crime and justice, then, might be summarized like this:

Crime is a violation of the state and its laws.

Justice establishes blame and administers pain through a contest between offender and state.

This way of viewing crime might be called “retributive justice.” It has little place for victims, uses what some scholars have called a “battle model” for settling things, and, because it is centered so heavily on establishing blame, looks primarily to the past rather than the future. It assumes that punishment or pain, usually in the form of a prison term, is the normal outcome.

This process concentrates almost exclusively on offenders, but, ironically, does not hold them accountable. To be accountable, offenders ought to be helped to understand and acknowledge the human consequences of their actions. Then they ought to be encouraged to take responsibility for what happens thereafter, including taking steps to right the wrong. Yet this rarely happens; indeed, the justice process discourages responsibility. Thus neither victim nor offender is offered the kind of opportunities that might aid healing and resolution for both.

But what is the alternative? How should we understand crime and justice?

An alternate understanding of crime and justice might look something like this:

Crime is a violation of people and their relationships.

Justice identifies needs and obligations so that things can be made right through a process which encourages dialogue and involves both victims and offenders.

A restorative approach to justice would understand that the essence of crime is a violation of people and of harmonious relations between them. Instead of asking first of all, “Who ‘done’ it? What should they get?” (and rarely going beyond this), a restorative approach to justice would ask “Who has been hurt? What can be done to make things right, and whose responsibility is it?” True justice would have as its goals restoration, reconciliation, and responsibility rather than retribution.

Restorative justice would aim to be personal. Insofar as possible, it would seek to empower victims and offenders to be involved in their own cases and, in the process, to learn something about one another. As in the Victim-Offender Reconciliation Program (VORP), which operates in many communities in the U.S. and Canada, when circumstances permit, justice would offer victims and offenders an opportunity to meet in order to exchange information and decide what is to be done. Understanding of one another, acceptance of responsibility, healing of injuries, and empowerment of participants would be important goals.

If our ancestors could view crime and justice this way, why can’t we?

Answer: To start a new day

Explanation: The continuous of a new day  ?Brainlist?

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

Not less than 10 jobs in either Basic or Hiregroup category.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

In the summary of Chapter 7, we find in the beginning she is annoyed because they are dressed exactly alike and it is annoying since in the Games they will have to kill each other.

please give thanks by clicking the heart :)

Answer:

"They" is a [C] Personal Pronoun.

Explanation:

Personal Pronoun is a substitute for the proper name of a person or a group of person. Likewise, "They" is used for a group of person. Therefore, "They" is a Personal Pronoun.

Answer:

harvested pearls from the oyster beds of Mexico.

Explanation:

Answer:

A compound declarative Sentence.

Explanation:

A declarative sentence is the most basic kind of sentence in English Language. This kind of sentence makes a statement, gives an explanation or passes across an information.

A compound declarative sentence is one that is not just a simple phrase but a group of phases joined together often separated with conjunctions such as and, but and a comma.

The sentence; "Other small stores lined both sides of the street for the next few blocks, and Chris quickly scanned the names on the storefronts nearby"  is a compound declarative sentence because it makes a statement, gives a description and is separated by a comma and the conjunction "and".

Answer: The Body of the Bread and Butterfly

Explanation:

It says so in the image.