The composition, forms, functions, means, locations, producers, audiences, outcomes, and criticism of discourse are at the heart of the rhetorical theory.
A technique for verbal and written communication, rhetoric is designed to enlighten, inspire, or persuade. In order to promote the speaker's desired aim, rhetoric makes an appeal to the listener's intellect and/or emotions.
Depending on how "rhetoric" is defined as their point of departure, rhetorical theories diverge from one another. The field of study known as rhetorical theory examines how people employ symbols. In common usage, the word rhetoric is often associated with negative ideas. Action is opposed to rhetoric, which is characterized as meaningless speech, inane chatter, and adornment.
To know more about rhetorical theory, refer to this link:
https://brainly.com/question/1382266
#SPJ4
This fight begins, however, in the heart and it now has been laid to my charge to keep my own heart free of hatred and despair. This intimation made my heart heavy and, now that my father was irrecoverable, I wished that he had been beside me so that I could have searched his face for the answers which only the future would give me now. —"Notes of a Native Son," James Baldwin Which device does Baldwin use when he says, "This fight begins, however, in the heart"?.
The device used by Baldwin in the statement, "This fight begins, however, in the heart" is called metaphor.
James Baldwin in "Notes of a Native Son", the device that he uses when he says, "This fight begins, however, in the heart" is metaphor. A metaphor is a figure of speech that is utilized to compare two things that are not typically connected. Baldwin uses the metaphor to represent the struggle for civil rights which begins in the heart rather than with physical acts of resistance.
The metaphor Baldwin uses symbolizes the conflict between his emotions and reason. He believes that it is important to begin the fight against racism with a change in oneself and that it is more of an internal struggle.
Know more about metaphor:
https://brainly.com/question/27250460
#SPJ11
which of the following best describes the narrator's current state, in regards to the wallpaper?
Based on the information provided, it seems that the narrator's current state in regards to the wallpaper is one of fixation and obsession.
The narrator has become increasingly fixated on the wallpaper in the room, spending hours analyzing and studying its patterns and colors. This obsessive behavior suggests that the wallpaper has become a source of preoccupation and perhaps even a form of escape from the narrator's daily life. It is possible that the narrator's fixation on the wallpaper is a symptom of a larger psychological issue, such as depression or anxiety, which is causing them to become increasingly detached from reality. Overall, the narrator's current state appears to be one of intense focus and fixation on the wallpaper, which may be indicative of a deeper psychological struggle.
More on narrator's state: https://brainly.com/question/29615883
#SPJ11
"jem condescended to take me to school the first day, a job usually done by one’s parents...." according to the context, condescended means _____.
Answer: Show feelings of supiriority
Explanation:
Write a paragraph evaluating the evidence the author of "The Benefits of Shale Gas" uses to support his claim that burning shale gas is good for the economy. Is the evidence relevant and
sufficient? Use details from the essay to support your answer
In the essay "The Benefits of Shale Gas," the author presents several pieces of evidence to support the claim that burning shale gas is beneficial for the economy.
The author highlights the increased domestic production of natural gas from shale, which reduces dependence on foreign energy sources and promotes energy security. Additionally, the author mentions the positive impact of shale gas on job creation, citing the growth of employment opportunities in the shale gas industry. Furthermore, the essay discusses the potential economic benefits associated with lower energy costs for consumers and businesses. These points provide relevant evidence to support the claim that burning shale gas is good for the economy.However, while the evidence presented in the essay is relevant, it may not be sufficient to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the claim. The essay focuses primarily on the economic benefits of shale gas, but it does not thoroughly address potential environmental concerns or long-term sustainability. The author does briefly mention environmental regulations and technological advancements that mitigate environmental risks, but a more in-depth exploration of these aspects would have strengthened the argument. Additionally, the essay could have included data on the economic impact beyond job creation, such as revenue generation or economic growth in regions where shale gas extraction occurs.Overall, while the evidence provided in the essay supports the claim that burning shale gas is beneficial for the economy, it may not be sufficient to provide a comprehensive evaluation. A more balanced analysis, considering both economic benefits and potential environmental consequences, would have strengthened the argument and provided a more nuanced perspective on the topic.
To learn more about Benefits click on the link below:
brainly.com/question/32550559
#SPJ11
Which of the following is the circulation of unofficial information in an organization?
a. Grapevine
b. Rumor mill
c. Water cooler
d. Downward communication
The circulation of unofficial information in an organization is commonly referred to as the grapevine. The grapevine is an informal communication network that exists within an organization.
It is characterized by the transmission of information through personal and often undocumented communication channels. The grapevine can be a source of both positive and negative information, and it can have a significant impact on an organization's culture and morale. While the grapevine can provide valuable insights into an organization's culture and the perceptions of its employees, it can also be a source of misinformation and rumors. As a result, managers need to be aware of the grapevine and actively work to manage it.
To know more about characterized refer :
https://brainly.com/question/14318383
#SPJ11
Based on this passage, what inference can be made about the english teacher? she did not pay attention to julia’s real name. she is also an immigrant who is new to the country. she did not like julia very much. she wanted to help julia fit in with the class.
Based on the passage, the inference that can be made about the English teacher is that she wanted to help Julia fit in with the class. There is no information provided to suggest that the English teacher did not pay attention to Julia's real name or that she is an immigrant who is new to the country.
The passage does not indicate any negative feelings towards Julia, so it cannot be inferred that the teacher did not like her. However, it does imply that the teacher took action to assist Julia in assimilating into the class. In the passage, it is mentioned that the teacher provided Julia with an "American name," which suggests that she wanted to help Julia feel more comfortable and integrated within the classroom environment. This action indicates a desire to facilitate Julia's sense of belonging and acceptance among her peers. By assigning an American name, the teacher likely aimed to ease any potential difficulties or barriers Julia may have faced due to cultural differences. Overall, the inference drawn from the passage is that the English teacher was supportive and proactive in helping Julia fit in with the class.
Learn more about acceptance here
https://brainly.com/question/30563284
#SPJ11
a plot diagram for “to kill a mockingbird” this picture for reference:
Proponents of the absolute income equality standard argue that individuals are __________ in thesatisfaction an extra dollar of income brings and that the law of diminishing marginal utility__________.a.alike; holdsb.alike; does not holdc.not alike; holdsd.not alike; does not hold
Proponents of the absolute income equality standard argue that individuals are not alike in the satisfaction an extra dollar of income brings and that the law of diminishing marginal utility does not hold. So the option d is correct.
The argument made by supporters of the absolute income equality standard is that because people have diverse life experiences, interests, and requirements, they do not all respond the same way to an additional dollar of money in terms of how satisfied they are.
This implies that not everyone would be equally satisfied with the same amount of money. For instance, a $100 increase for someone who is poor may be considerably more satisfying than a $100 increase for someone who has a lot of spare money to spend.
Additionally, because an increase in income does not always translate into a decrease in the satisfaction it brings, the law of diminishing marginal utility does not apply to income equality. So the option d is correct.
To learn more about marginal utility link is here
brainly.com/question/30841513
#SPJ4
as stated in "view from the empire state building," what is the main reason that helen keller is writing to dr. finley?
The main reason Helen Keller is writing to Dr. Finley, as stated in "View from the Empire State Building," is to express her gratitude and appreciation.
Why did Helen Keller write to Dr. Finley?Helen Keller wrote to Dr. Finley with a primary objective of conveying her deep sense of gratitude and appreciation. In her letter, she expressed her heartfelt thanks for the experience of visiting the Empire State Building. Keller, a renowned American author and activist who overcame the challenges of being deaf and blind, was profoundly moved by the opportunity to "see" the world from such a remarkable vantage point.
Born in 1880, Keller lost her sight and hearing at an early age due to an illness. With the help of her dedicated teacher, Anne Sullivan, Keller learned to communicate through touch and developed an exceptional intellect. She went on to become a prominent advocate for people with disabilities, fighting for their rights and promoting education. Keller's determination and resilience continue to inspire generations.
Learn more about Helen Keller
brainly.com/question/18783117
#SPJ11
What is the best way to structure an argumentative essay once the thesis has
been stated?
A. Support the thesis by presenting counter-arguments first, and then
rebuttals.
B. Support the thesis by first developing evidence and then
addressing counter-arguments.
C. Support the thesis by first addressing counter-arguments, then
developing evidence.
D. Support the thesis by listing the most reliable sources of
information.
Answer:
The best way to structure an argumentative essay once the thesis has been stated is Option C: support the thesis by first addressing counter-arguments, then developing evidence.
Explanation:
The structure of an argumentative essay should be focused on synthesizing the information presented in the essay to make a logically sound argument. By beginning with counter-arguments, the essay can create an atmosphere of understanding and consideration that is necessary for an effective argumentative essay.
Counter-arguments allow for an essay to take into account all perspectives and angles of the argument, not just the ones that support the thesis. By presenting counter-arguments first, the essay is able to acknowledge the opposition in the argument, and be thorough in its argumentation. After the counter-arguments are presented, the essay can support the thesis further by developing evidence. This evidence can be a combination of facts, statistics, and reliable sources that back up the claims in the thesis.
Hope I helped, brainliest would be appreciated! Please let me know if it is wrong. :))
Question 3 of 20 A person is reading a horror novel. Which reaction on the reader's part would show that the suspension of disbelief has been maintained? A. Interpreting the themes B. Criticizing the writer's style C. Closing the book out of fear D. Imagining a better ending SUBMIT
The reaction that would show that the suspension of disbelief has been maintained while reading a horror novel is C. Closing the book out of fear.
Suspension of disbelief refers to the reader's willingness to temporarily set aside their skepticism and accept the fictional world presented in the story as real. In the context of a horror novel, the goal is to immerse oneself in the narrative and experience a sense of fear and tension.
By closing the book out of fear, the reader is actively engaging with the story and experiencing a visceral response. It indicates that they have become emotionally invested in the events and atmosphere created by the author.
This reaction demonstrates that the reader has successfully suspended their disbelief and allowed themselves to be absorbed into the terrifying world of the novel.
The other options, such as interpreting the themes, criticizing the writer's style, or imagining a better ending, do not necessarily indicate a maintained suspension of disbelief. These reactions imply a more analytical or detached response to the story, which can disrupt the immersion in the fictional world.
For more questions on horror novel, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30032217
#SPJ8
What does Fiedler's contingency model measure?
Answer: Fiedler's Contingency Theory states that, for a leader to be effective, their leadership style must fit the situation. Using this model, you'll identify your own leadership style, assess the situation that requires leadership, and determine whether you're the right leader.
• Write an introduction with a hook and a claim. • Use reasons and evidence to support the topic sentence. • Avoid logical fallacies when you write supporting statements. • Use transitions to connect ideas. • Either restate your thesis or provide a thought-provoking remark in your conclusion. • Connect your essay’s claim to a larger idea. • Complete and submit a works cited page that lists print and multimedia sources. Please help me write a argument essay!
The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health: Unveiling the Hidden Dangers
Hook: In today's digital age, social media has become an integral part of our lives, providing us with unprecedented connectivity and access to information. However, amidst its seemingly boundless benefits, there lurks a hidden danger that threatens our mental well-being.Claim: The pervasive influence of social media has detrimental effects on mental health, leading to increased anxiety, depression, and feelings of inadequacy among its users.Body Paragraph 1:Reason: Social media cultivates a culture of comparison and unrealistic expectations.Evidence: Research studies have consistently shown a correlation between heavy social media use and increased levels of anxiety and depression. The constant exposure to carefully curated and filtered versions of others' lives fosters feelings of inadequacy and self-doubt, as users compare their own lives to highlight reels.
To know more about Mental click the link below:
brainly.com/question/30624687
#SPJ11
It was Mark's first day of school in a new town. He walked into his new classroom.
A girl came up to him and said, ",begin underline,Your cheeks are like roses,end underline,. Is today your first day?"
Mark nodded and looked down at his feet.
"It's okay," said the girl.
"My name is Sadie. I'm new too. You don't have to be scared. Let's be friends."
Mark looked up from his shoes and smiled at Sadie. He was happy to have a new friend.
Question
What is the meaning of "Your cheeks are like roses" as it is used in the passage?
Answer options with 4 options
1.
Mark smells good.
2.
Mark has a nice smile.
3.
Mark's cheeks are red.
4.
Mark's cheeks are soft.
Answer:
3.Mark's cheeks are red.
Please mark as Brainliest!!!Answer:
3. Mark's cheeks are red.
Explanation:
roses are red and he is shy so he's blushing
Dr. King compares just and unjust laws in order to explain why African Americans
a-have been too frightened to protest
b-are justified in feeling resentful
c-have the right to break some laws
d-are facing an unfair judicial system
Dr. King compares just and unjust laws to argue that African Americans have the right to break some laws and are facing an unfair judicial system.(option c)
Dr. King's comparison of just and unjust laws aims to shed light on the experiences of African Americans and the systemic injustices they face. He argues that African Americans have been justified in feeling resentful due to the existence of unjust laws that perpetuate discrimination and inequality. These unjust laws create a climate of fear and intimidation, making African Americans hesitant to protest for their rights.
Moreover, Dr. King asserts that African Americans have the right to break some laws in their pursuit of justice and equality. By breaking unjust laws, they challenge the status quo and draw attention to the systemic injustices they face. This act of civil disobedience is seen as a necessary means to bring about meaningful change and dismantle discriminatory systems.
Furthermore, Dr. King contends that the judicial system often operates unfairly against African Americans, resulting in systemic racial bias and unequal treatment. African Americans are disproportionately targeted, arrested, and sentenced, reflecting an inherent bias in the system. This unfair judicial system further reinforces the need for African Americans to challenge unjust laws and fight for their rights through peaceful protests and civil disobedience.
In summary, Dr. King's comparison of just and unjust laws highlights the reasons why African Americans may feel frightened, resentful, and justified in breaking certain laws. It also underscores the existence of an unfair judicial system that perpetuates racial disparities. His teachings continue to inspire discussions and actions towards achieving a more just and equitable society.
Learn more about Dr. King here:
https://brainly.com/question/22048105
#SPJ11
If 80. 0 grams of I2O5 react with 28. 0 grams of CO, what mass of I2 can be produced? If 40. 6 grams of I2 are actually produced, what is the percent yield of I2? Balanced equation: I2O5 + 5CO → 5CO2 + I2
The percent yield of I2 in this reaction is approximately 50.8%. The reaction between 80.0 grams of I2O5 and 28.0 grams of CO produces a certain amount of I2.
If 40.6 grams of I2 are actually obtained, the percent yield of I2 can be calculated. The balanced equation for the reaction is I2O5 + 5CO → 5CO2 + I2. The percent yield of I2 can be determined by dividing the actual yield (40.6 grams) by the theoretical yield and multiplying by 100. To find the theoretical yield of I2, we need to calculate the limiting reagent first. To determine the limiting reagent, we compare the number of moles of I2O5 and CO present. The molar mass of I2O5 is 254 g/mol, and the molar mass of CO is 28 g/mol. By dividing the given masses by their respective molar masses, we find that there are 0.315 moles of I2O5 and 1 mole of CO. From the balanced equation, we can see that the stoichiometric ratio between I2O5 and I2 is 1:1. Therefore, the theoretical yield of I2 is also 0.315 moles. To convert the theoretical yield from moles to grams, we multiply the moles by the molar mass of I2, which is 254 g/mol. Thus, the theoretical yield of I2 is 0.315 moles * 254 g/mol = 79.89 grams. Now we can calculate the percent yield by dividing the actual yield (40.6 grams) by the theoretical yield (79.89 grams) and multiplying by 100: (40.6 g / 79.89 g) * 100 ≈ 50.8%.
Learn more about molar mass here:
https://brainly.com/question/30216315
#SPJ11
Aaron poured a square patio out of concrete. It had a perimeter of 22. 8meters. What is the area of this patio?
To find the area of the square patio, we need to know the length of one side of the square. Since a square has all sides equal in length, we can find the length of one side by dividing the perimeter by 4 (as there are 4 sides in a square).
Perimeter = 22.8 meters
Length of one side = Perimeter/4 = 22.8/4 = 5.7 meters
Now, to calculate the area of the square patio, we square the length of one sideArea = (Length of one side)^2 = 5.7^2 = 32.49 square metersTherefore, the area of the patio is 32.49 square meters.
To learn more about perimeter click on the link below:
brainly.com/question/29081108
#SPJ11
How does the text help us understand the relationship between people and the government? city systems
In general, texts that discuss the relationship between people and government or city systems often provide insight into how individuals interact with the government or the systems that govern their daily lives.
Such texts can help us understand the roles and responsibilities of government and individuals in a given society or community. They can also provide insight into how government policies and decisions impact people's daily lives and how people can participate in the democratic process to shape government policies. City systems can also refer to the physical infrastructure and organization of urban areas, including transportation systems, housing, public services, and the built environment.
Learn more about the relationship between the government and people here
https://brainly.com/question/31992624
#SPJ1
In your opinion, is it important to continue to study farming and improve the land? Why or why not? Explain your answer by citing evidence from this text in your answer. Your answer:
In my opinion, it is important to continue studying farming and improving the land.
The text does not provide specific evidence to cite, as it does not mention farming or land improvement. However, I can provide a general explanation for the importance of studying farming and improving the land based on common knowledge and agricultural practices. Studying farming and improving the land is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it allows us to enhance agricultural practices and increase food production to meet the growing demands of a growing population. By studying farming techniques, crop rotations, and soil management, we can improve yields, reduce crop failures, and ensure food security. Secondly, studying farming and land improvement promotes sustainability and environmental stewardship. It enables us to implement practices that conserve natural resources, prevent soil erosion, protect water quality, and preserve biodiversity.
By understanding the interactions between agriculture and the environment, we can develop methods that minimize negative impacts and promote long-term sustainability. Lastly, studying farming and land improvement encourages innovation and adaptation. Agriculture is a dynamic field, and by staying updated on new research and technologies, we can find better ways to address challenges such as climate change, pests, and diseases. Continuous learning and improvement are essential for the success and resilience of the agricultural industry. Overall, studying farming and improving the land is important for food production, environmental sustainability, and agricultural innovation. It enables us to address current and future challenges, ensuring a sustainable and prosperous agricultural sector.
Learn more about natural resources here:
https://brainly.com/question/32129155
#SPJ11
decide whether the following french sentence is grammatically correct or incorrect. ils connaissent mme letrand. correct incorrect
The given French sentence "ils connaissent Mme Letrand" is grammatically correct. It translates to "they know Mrs. Letrand" in English. The subject "ils" (they) agrees with the verb "connaissent" (know), which is conjugated correctly in the present tense.
The French sentence you provided, "Ils connaissent Mme Letrand," is grammatically correct. In this sentence, "Ils" means "they," "connaissent" is the verb "to know" (connaître) in the third person plural form, "Mme" is an abbreviation for "Madame," and "Letrand" is a proper name. The sentence translates to "They know Mrs. Letrand" in English. "Mme Letrand" is capitalized as it is a proper noun, and the gender agreement is correct as well. In summary, the given French sentence is grammatically correct as it follows the rules of subject-verb agreement and noun-gender agreement.
To know more about grammatically
https://brainly.com/question/27406454
#SPJ11
how does the author use details and evidence to support their central idea?
Answer:
is this a general question for all authors, or was there supposed to be something attached?
3) write an essay about the following prompt:
Throughout the novel, O'Brien presents an essential paradox about war: it is horrible and it is
beautiful. Trace some of the ways O'Brien and the other characters experience the
contradictions of war -- both its horror and its beauty. lemons death, chemo girl
The Paradox of War: Exploring the Contradictions of Horror and Beauty
Introduction:
In Tim O'Brien's novel, war is depicted as an essential paradox—simultaneously horrific and beautiful. The characters in the story are confronted with the contradictory nature of war, experiencing moments of terror and devastation alongside instances of unexpected beauty and profound human connection.
Through poignant examples such as Lemon's death and the encounter with the "chemo girl," O'Brien masterfully highlights the complexities and contradictions inherent in the wartime experience.
Body:
Lemon's Death:
One striking example of the paradoxical nature of war is demonstrated through the death of Ted Lavender, a young soldier in O'Brien's platoon. The horrific aspect of war is evident as Ted Lavender tragically loses his life, his death serving as a reminder of the unpredictable and destructive forces at play.
The gruesome realities of violence and loss are portrayed, leaving the characters and readers devastated. However, amidst this horror, O'Brien also manages to find beauty.
He describes the surreal and poetic nature of Lemon's death, depicting the tranquil setting of the battlefield and the delicate balance between life and death.
This juxtaposition underscores the paradox of war, where moments of unexpected beauty emerge amidst the chaos and tragedy.
The Chemo Girl:
Another instance that exemplifies the paradox of war is the encounter with the "chemo girl." While seeking refuge from the harsh realities of combat, O'Brien and his comrades stumble upon a young girl receiving chemotherapy in a medical facility.
Here, the horror of war is starkly contrasted with the beauty of compassion and shared humanity. Witnessing the vulnerability of a sick child prompts a collective introspection among the soldiers, challenging their notions of purpose and the value of life.
In this moment, war becomes a catalyst for a profound sense of empathy and an appreciation for the preciousness of existence, revealing the unexpected beauty that can arise even in the darkest of circumstances.
Personal Reflections and Transformations:
Throughout the novel, O'Brien delves into the characters' individual experiences and internal conflicts, further highlighting the paradoxical nature of war.
The soldiers grapple with their own emotions, navigating the tension between the horrors they witness and the resilience and camaraderie that emerge from these experiences.
Moments of fear, guilt, and despair are intertwined with instances of love, bravery, and loyalty, creating a complex tapestry of emotions and contradictions.
Conclusion:
In Tim O'Brien's novel, war is portrayed as a paradox—a juxtaposition of the horrific and the beautiful. Through vivid storytelling and introspective reflections, O'Brien captures the multidimensional nature of war, showcasing how moments of terror and devastation coexist with unexpected instances of beauty and humanity.
The death of Lemon and the encounter with the "chemo girl" are just two powerful examples that epitomize this paradox, provoking contemplation on the contradictory nature of war.
By exploring these contradictions, O'Brien invites readers to grapple with the complexities of human experience and challenges prevailing notions about war.
Ultimately, this examination of war's paradoxical nature serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring impact it has on individuals and society as a whole.
For more questions on: Paradox
https://brainly.com/question/12861235
#SPJ11
complete the sentence. A(n) _____ is an expression that uses variables to state a rule.
A(n) equation is an expression that uses variables to state a rule. In mathematics, an equation is a statement that asserts the equality of two mathematical expressions.
An equation is a mathematical expression that incorporates variables, constants, and mathematical operations like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. It serves to represent relationships, patterns, or rules in diverse fields, such as algebra, physics, and engineering. With variables, equations offer flexibility and generality, enabling the creation of universal rules or formulas applicable to various scenarios or values.
Equations play a crucial role in problem-solving and mathematical modeling, offering a concise and accurate means of expressing mathematical relationships and principles. They are instrumental in analyzing and understanding complex systems, aiding in the formulation of solutions and predictions based on mathematical concepts.
To learn more about equation, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/15707224
#SPJ4
"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him
power. " How does this quote connect to Animal Farm? Use text evidence to support your thinking.
The quote "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power" can be connected to George Orwell's Animal Farm. In the novel, the quote reflects the transformation of the pigs' character and their abuse of power after the animals overthrow the humans and establish their own self-governing society.
One key example is the character Napoleon, who initially presents himself as a leader working for the betterment of all animals. However, as he gains more power, he becomes corrupt and tyrannical. He manipulates the principles of Animalism to justify his actions and consolidate his authority. This can be seen when he gradually amasses privileges for himself, such as living in the farmhouse, hoarding resources, and using force to maintain control over the other animals.Textual evidence that supports this connection can be found throughout the novel. For instance, after the animals take over the farm, the pigs rewrite the commandments of Animalism to suit their own desires. Initially, the commandment "All animals are equal" is established, but it is later altered to "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." This manipulation of power demonstrates how the pigs' character changes when given authority.Furthermore, the use of propaganda and manipulation by the pigs, particularly Squealer, further exemplifies the connection to the quote. The pigs exploit their position of power to control and deceive the other animals. They twist facts and use persuasive language to maintain their dominance, revealing the true nature of their character when given power.In summary, the quote "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power" relates to Animal Farm through the transformation of the pigs' character and their abuse of power. The novel illustrates how those in authority can be corrupted when given unchecked power, as seen in the character of Napoleon and the manipulation of Animalism's principles.
To learn more about power click on the link below:
brainly.com/question/32052426
#SPJ11
general or abstract ideas generally work best for concept or expository speeches, as they allow for the most creative analysis and interpretation.
When it comes to concept or expository speeches, using general or abstract ideas can be extremely effective. These types of speeches are all about analyzing and interpreting a topic, and by using abstract ideas, you have more room for creativity and exploration.
Abstract ideas are often complex, and therefore require deeper analysis and interpretation. This can lead to more interesting and insightful speeches. In contrast, concrete ideas are often more straightforward and can limit the speaker's ability to explore different angles and interpretations. Depending on the topic and purpose of the speech, specific examples and details may be necessary to fully illustrate the concept being discussed.
The complete question is :
general or abstract ideas generally work best for concept or expository speeches, as they allow for the most creative analysis and interpretation. What type of idea generally works best for concept or expository speeches?
To know more about Interpretation refer :
https://brainly.com/question/1499374
#SPJ11
L3 ERR
A Patch of Old Snow
What is the rhyme scheme of
the second stanza of Robert
Frost's poem?
A abcb
There's a patch of old snow in a corner
That I should have guessed
Was a blow-away paper the rain
Had brought to rest.
B. Aabb
Cabab
D. Abbb
It is speckled with grime as if
Small print overspread it.
The news of a day I've forgotten --
If I ever read it
03-11
Audy of Sci. 4 gissRescreen
The rhyme scheme of the second stanza of Robert Frost's poem is Aabb.The poem titled "A Patch of Old Snow" is a short lyrical piece of literature by Robert Frost.
It is written in four stanzas, each of four lines. The second stanza of the poem is as follows:It is speckled with grime as ifSmall print overspread it.The news of a day I've forgotten --If I ever read it.The rhyme scheme of this stanza is Aabb. The first and the second line have an end rhyme of "if" and "it". On the other hand, the third and the fourth line have an end rhyme of "forgotten" and "read it". Thus, the rhyme scheme of the second stanza of Robert Frost's poem is Aabb.
To learn more about Robert click on the link below:
brainly.com/question/15129336
#SPJ11
you give a speech that teaches the audience how to make a lemon meringue pie. which contemporary speech genre does this fall under?
The speech about making a lemon meringue pie falls under the genre of demonstrative speeches, which is a contemporary speech genre.
Demonstrative speeches aim to teach or explain a process, a technique or a product to the audience in an informative and engaging way. In this case, the speaker is demonstrating how to make a lemon meringue pie, giving step-by-step instructions and highlighting the key ingredients and tools necessary for the recipe. This type of speech can be used in various contexts, such as cooking classes, workshops, or even public speaking events.
To know more about necessary refer :
https://brainly.com/question/28207034
#SPJ11
after completing a test it is best to spend at least in our admittedly after the test reviewing information
After completing a test, it is best to spend at least a few minutes reviewing the information.
This will help reinforce the material in your mind and identify any mistakes or areas of weakness that you can work on improving for future tests. It is important to admit any mistakes you may have made and not dwell on them too much, but rather focus on how you can learn from them and improve in the future. By taking the time to review and reflect on the test, you can turn it into a valuable learning experience.
More on tests: https://brainly.com/question/30398211
#SPJ11
The Odyssey Part 1
What is an invocation? Why does he call upon the Muses?
In "The Odyssey," an invocation is a traditional opening in which the author calls upon the Muses for inspiration and guidance. By invoking the Muses, the author seeks their assistance in recounting the epic tale of Odysseus, emphasizing the importance of divine inspiration in the creation of the narrative.
An invocation, in the context of "The Odyssey" and other epic poems, refers to the act of calling upon the Muses for assistance. The Muses were nine goddesses in Greek mythology who were believed to inspire and guide artists, musicians, and poets. The invocation serves as a way for the author to acknowledge the divine source of inspiration and seek the Muses' assistance in telling the story.
Homer, the presumed author of "The Odyssey," opens the epic with the invocation to the Muses, specifically asking for their help in recounting the adventures of the hero Odysseus. By calling upon the Muses, Homer acknowledges their role as the source of inspiration and wisdom, emphasizing the importance of their guidance in the creation of the narrative. This invocation sets the tone for the epic, establishing a connection between the mortal poet and the divine forces that shape and inspire his storytelling. The poet's plea to the Muses reflects the belief that great works of literature are not solely products of human creativity but are influenced and guided by the divine.
Learn more about The Odyssey here:
https://brainly.com/question/28402951
#SPJ11
if an opinionis different from accepted belief, it might be called
If an opinion is different from accepted belief, it might be called a dissenting opinion.
A dissenting opinion is a viewpoint that opposes the prevailing or majority opinion. It can be seen as a critical evaluation of the commonly accepted beliefs or theories. Dissenting opinions can be found in various fields, including law, politics, science, and religion. In law, a dissenting opinion is written by a judge who disagrees with the majority's decision.
In politics, dissenting opinions are expressed by those who do not agree with the government's policies. In science, dissenting opinions challenge the prevailing theories and offer new insights. Overall, dissenting opinions play an important role in encouraging critical thinking and promoting intellectual diversity.
More on dissenting opinion: https://brainly.com/question/11651416
#SPJ11