The four main causes of World War One were Nationalism, Imperialism, Alliances and Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
Nationalism: Nationalistic feelings and competition between countries, particularly in Europe, contributed to the outbreak of war. Countries were eager to prove their strength and superiority, which led to an arms race and alliances forming between nations.
Imperialism: Competition for colonies and resources between countries also played a role in the outbreak of war. Countries were determined to expand their empires and gain control of valuable resources.
Alliances: Countries formed alliances with one another for protection and support. These alliances ultimately pulled other countries into the war as they felt obligated to defend their allies.
Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand: The assassination of the heir to the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1914 was the spark that ignited the powder keg of tensions in Europe and led to the outbreak of war.
These causes, along with other underlying issues, led to a world war as countries were drawn into the conflict through their alliances and imperialistic desires, and the nationalism sentiments of people fueled their countries to participate in the war.
To know more about world war 1 click below:
https://brainly.com/question/12233146#
#SPJ4
What were two results of the decline of the roman empire? violent attacks from eastern tribes a drop in the education of citizens an increase in superstitious beliefs the empire’s move toward christianity the murder of emperor constantine
Options (a) violent attacks from eastern tribes and option (b) a drop in education of citizens are the correct options.
The two results of the decline of roman empire is violent attacks from eastern tribes and drop in education of citizens.
What were the reasons for the decline in the Roman empire and its result?Political instability leading to conflicts and wars decreasing the economy.Rise of eastern empire day by day resulted in decreasing the power of the roman empire.Inequality between rich and poor people resulting in increased anger among the citizens.Farmers' soils are getting wasted, decreasing in crops.Economic crisis was also a main reason for the fall of the Roman empire.Due to above stated reasons the following things happened:
Violent attacks from eastern tribes was a result as the power was more in hands of eastern empire so they were easily accessible to torture the citizens causing violence.A drop in education of citizens was also a result because people were low on money due to the economic crisis and due to the violence going on they were afraid to send their children to schools. Also, inequality between the citizens of the Roman Empire and eastern Empire was a major cause.To know more about Roman Empire visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11415671
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is:
"What were two results of the decline of the roman empire?
a) violent attacks from eastern tribes
b) a drop in the education of citizens
c) an increase in superstitious beliefs
d) the empire’s move toward Christianity
e) the murder of emperor Constantine"
Congress enacted the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in order to:
O provide low-interest loans to farmers
O enable homeowners to keep their homes
O protect people's savings accounts
Andrew johnson did not believe in granting citizenship to all african americans.
Answer: True
Explanation: Johnson believed the Southern states should decide the course that was best for them. He also felt that African-Americans were unable to manage their own lives. He certainly did not think that African-Americans deserved to vote.
Which is the best example of the strength and advancement of the Old Kingdom’s central government?
It constructed great monuments.
It improved trade and transportation.
It expanded territory.
It advanced weapons.
Answer:
It advanced weapons
Explanation:
Because there is advancement of weapons and brings better strength to soldiers because with better weapons can overcome strong armies..
"bleeding kansas" refers to the _____. war between the u.s. army and indigenous people slaughter of buffalo on the plains raids between abolitionists and pro-enslavement militias battles between settlers claiming land
"Bleeding Kansas" refers to the raids between abolitionists and proslavery militias.
Bleeding Kansas describes the duration of repeated outbreaks of violent guerrilla struggle among seasoned-slavery and anti-slavery forces following the introduction of the new territory of Kansas in 1854. In all, some fifty-five human beings were killed between 1855 and 1859.
Bleeding Kansas was a part of the political hurricane that came about all through the united states before the Civil warfare. The anti-slavery forces prevailed as Kansas entered the Union as a loose state on January 29, 1861.
Bleeding Kansas describes the length of repeated outbreaks of violent guerrilla conflict among seasoned-slavery and anti-slavery forces following the introduction of the brand new territory of Kansas in 1854. In all, 55 people had been killed between 1855 and 1859.
Learn more about bleeding Kansas here https://brainly.com/question/1352175
#SPJ4
What is iridium what role did it play in the alvarezes discovery? what was the hypothesis the alvarezes formalized in their 1980 paper?
Iridium is rare in the earth's crust but ample in meteorites, the Alvarez group took the presence of the element at the k-T boundary as evidence that the impact of a huge meteorite led to the death of the dinosaurs.
A meteorite is a solid piece of debris from an object, inclusive of a comet, asteroid, or meteoroid, that originates in the outer area and survives its passage through the atmosphere to attain the surface of a planet or moon.
A meteorite is any fairly small natural object from interplanetary space—i.e., a meteoroid—that survives its passage through Earth's environment and lands on the surface. In current usage, the time period is broadly applied to comparable objects that land on the surface of different comparatively large bodies.
learn more about meteorites here https://brainly.com/question/730344
#SPJ4
How did Andrew Jackson respond to the supreme court decision that declared Georgia's Native American removal laws unconstitutional?
A. He ignored the court's ruling.
B. He said that Chief Justice Marshall's decision was going to be impossible to put into practice.
C. He said that Georgia would need to change its laws relating to the Cherokee.
D. He expected Chief Justice Marshall to force Native Americans out of georgia.
Andrew Jackson's response to the supreme court decision was that He ignored the court's ruling. This is further explained below.
How did Andrew Jackson respond to the supreme court decision that declared Georgia's Native American removal laws unconstitutional?Generally, During the War of 1812, Andrew Jackson, while serving as the captain of the Tennessee militia, achieved a significant victory against the Creek Indians (allied with the British). His valorous performance against the British forces at the Battle of New Orleans solidified his status as a legendary military hero.
In conclusion, The reaction that Andrew Jackson provided to the judgement made by the Supreme Court was that he disregarded the decision.
Read more about Andrew Jackson
https://brainly.com/question/27920494
#SPJ1
During the cold war, what did the united states and the soviet union expect from third world countries?
During the cold war, the united states and the soviet union expect from third world countries because these leaders desired to create nations that were more robust and advanced. Additionally, they wished to lessen the impact of foreign governments on their internal affairs. They also need aid and support from more developed nations at the same time.
Cold War, the post-World War II competition between the US and the Soviet Union and its allies, was an open but restrained conflict. There was little use of actual weapons throughout the Cold War; instead, it was fought on fronts of politics, economics, and propaganda.
To learn more about Cold War refer
https://brainly.com/question/12698715
#SPJ4
The following was a result of World War I?
Answer:
what are the options? you forgot to list them
The decisions of the us and soviet union to build nuclear weapons is much like the prisoners’ dilemma. a. true b. false
It is a true statement that the decisions of the U.S. and Soviet Union to build nuclear weapons is much like the prisoners’ dilemma.
What is a prisoners’ dilemma?This refers to a situation where decision-makers always have an objective to choose in a way that creates a less than optimal outcome for the individuals as a group.
Generally, the nuclear arms race between the United States and Soviet Union was labeled as an interpretation of the Prisoner's Dilemma because such scenarios showcased why two players may act selfishly even if the acting selflessly appears to be in their best interests.
The nuclear arms race between the nations is an example of a Prisoner's Dilemma because each side would have been better off if both had fewer weapons but each side had an incentive to defect.
Therefore, It is a true statement that the decisions of the U.S. and Soviet Union to build nuclear weapons is much like the prisoners’ dilemma.
Read more about prisoners dilemma
brainly.com/question/11980505
#SPJ1
At the beginning of the 20th century, the leading cause of death in the united states was:______
Answer: AIDS or HIV
Explanation:
John T. Scopes, was put on trial for:
Time Elap:
Attempt due:
O Teaching creationsim
© Teaching evolution
O Being a leader of the Ku Klux Klan
0 Violating prohibition laws
Answer:
B. Teaching Evolution
Explanation:
John T. Scopes was put on trial for teaching about Evolution. It was said that he violated the "Tennessee Butler Act" which made it prohibited to teach about Evolution since it would confuse and/or conflict the creation theories.
I hope it helps! I hope you have a great day!
Anygays-
Answer:
B. Teaching Evolution
Explanation:
It could be either D. as well since he violated a law/act. And the Act he violated was the "Tennessee Butler Act" which was that it was not allowed to teach about Evolution.
I hope it helps! I hope you have a great day!
Pan~
Which of the following statements best represents Abraham Lincoln's experience of and views on slavery prior to the Civil War
Answer:
"I oppose the spread of slavery into the West, but the Constitution has no authority to interfere with slavery where it already exists
plus give brainliest
The immigrants facing the harshest reception in late-nineteenth-century america were those arriving from.
Answer: The immigrants facing the harshest reception in late nineteenth-century America were those arriving from: China. A leading opponent of American imperialism was: William Jennings Bryan.
If a country has the comparative advantage in producing a product that means they _______________.
a
they can simply make more than anyone else
b
they have lower labor costs than most other countries
c
the have the highest opportunity cost in relation to producing the good
d
have a lower opportunity cost in producing that particular good than someone else
Option C :
• They have the highest opportunity cost in relation to producing the good.
George Washington was a famous Anti-Federalist.
Answer:
No, Washington was a federalist, so he favored a strong central government. He also had a strong affinity for aristocrats.
Explanation:
2. What are expressed powers?
a. powers granted to the federal government by the Supreme Court decisions
b. powers specifically expressed in the text of the Constitution
c. powers expressed in legislation passed by Congress
d. powers granted to the federal government by the Tenth Amendment
e. powers exercised according to the necessary and proper clause
Powers specifically expressed in the text of the Constitution have expressed powers. Option B. This is further explained below.
What have expressed powers?Generally, The powers of the federal government that are specifically stated in the Constitution are known as "expressed powers." By outlining the scope of the national government's authority, stated powers serve as a check on its power.
In conclusion, In the Constitution, only those powers that are explicitly stated are expressed powers
Read more about expressed powers
https://brainly.com/question/17039439
#SPJ1
At the end of this lesson, you learned a little about four genocides that have occurred since world war ii. choose one of the genocides to study further. use one of these resources to start your research: cambodia bosnia-herzegovina rwanda darfur based on your research, write a short essay of 250–300 words discussing the genocide you have chosen to study. your essay should describe the events that match the eight stages of genocide. it should also answer these questions: why did this genocide start and who was involved? what steps might people have taken to prevent genocide? provide examples of those steps. how can the international community prevent genocide in the future?
Among the options given, the one i am going to talk about is the Rwanda genocides .
Why did this genocide start and who was involved?The Rwanda genocide is known to be a very popular one where there was the coming together of decades long division and incitement in terms of hatred to there counterpart which were the Tutsi by the extremists who were found in the country's leadership, and it was the ones that was said to be controlled by members of the Hutu majority group.
What steps might people have taken to prevent genocide?The UN was said to have taken steps to prevent the Rwandan genocide. Since there was a power vacuum that was made by his death, The Rwanda's Hutu political elite were said to have launched a long-wide campaign of genocide but the U.N. was said to have given orders for its blue helmeted troops to remove foreigners but they did not intervene to save the Tutsis people.
Learn more about Rwanda genocides from
https://brainly.com/question/14616123
#SPJ2
Who was the German author who won the Nobel Prize for literature in 1946 for his depiction of the spiritual loneliness of modern humans in a mechanized, urban society
Answer: Hermann Hesse
It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.
–John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, opinion of the court
Use the quote to answer the question.
What argument was the author of this statement, John Marshall, making about how the federal government should function?
A. The judicial branch of the federal government should have the power to make laws.
B. The judicial branch of the federal government should have power to interpret laws.
C. The judicial branch has the sole authority to establish a federal court system.
D. Only the laws created by the federal government, and approved by the court, have any authority in the federal system.
The argument that John Marshall is making in this excerpt about the federal government is B. The judicial branch of the federal government should have power to interpret laws.
What does John Marshall believe?John Marshall is saying that the Judiciary should be the only ones with the power to interpret the law.
His argument is the main role of the judiciary as it interprets the law through court cases.
Find out more on John Marshall at https://brainly.com/question/925686
#SPJ1
Option B. The argument that this author was making in terms of the laws was that The judicial branch of the federal government should have power to interpret laws.
What is the power of the Judiciary?The Judiciary is the branch of government that is responsible for interpreting the law of the land based on the nations constitution.
The legislative on the other hand are the people that are responsible for making these laws.
Read more on the judiciary here:
https://brainly.com/question/26647893
#SPJ1
The earliest egyptian and nubian states were:______.
a. centralized empires
b. unified early because of the unique nature of the tigris.
c. city states
d. small kingdoms
e. trading networks
The earliest Egyptian and Nubian states were small kingdoms.
Both Nubia and Ancient Egypt experienced times of peace and conflict. Based on rock art, it is thought that early Egyptian pharaohs and Nubian kings both employed comparable royal emblems.
Marriages between the two did take place, and there was frequently harmonious cultural exchange and cooperation.
In the southern part of Egypt, in the Nile Valley, is Nubia. Over the years, there was no conflict between Nubians and Egyptians. Egypt continued to hold a high standing among the Nubians due to its more powerful empire.
Nubians were drawn to Egypt's rich culture and civilization, which they later replicated in numerous ways. Small kingdoms made up the oldest Egyptian and Nubian states.
To learn more about Nubians refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/6562628
#SPJ1
1. Which party is more likely to turn Uhuru into a client state of the Soviet Union — one that is dependent on the USSR — and why?
2. Which party is more likely to set up a pro-Western government, and why?
3. What might be the result of supporting the Brown Party with soft or hard power?
1. The Brown Party: This party is seen to be more likely to turn the Uhuru into a client state of the Soviet Union because of its desire to be near to other countries. Also, the party wants to invest in other foreign nations. An interest to work with the Soviet Union will be as a result of the party's desire to work with other nations.
2. The Green Party: This party faction is more likely to set up a pro-Western government because of its focus on agriculture. Also, under the Central Government, its desire is to nationalize the utilities, agriculture, even the mining industries.
The Green Party also desires to stay neutral in the Cold War. This is seen as the best for the United States because they will not get involved with other nations.
3. Supporting the Brown Party with soft power will result to better and fruitful negotiations with other nations. This is because it wants close relationships with those nations. Such a decision might not work due to the fact that when a country is working out agreements with other countries, it can be sometimes be hard or difficult. Also, it can take up too much time.
While supporting Brown Party with hard power could result to more development in weapons and also lead to an increase in tensions resulting to war.Answer:
Explanation:
How did each of the following federal actions contribute to the expansion of civil rights in the United States
"Separate but equal" schools came to an end with the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954.
The Fair Housing Act permitted the federal government to take legal action in incidents of discrimination in the housing marketplace.
This is further explained below.
What are civil rights?Generally, the freedom and equality of people in politics and society.
In conclusion, Equal protection under the law is provided under the 14th Amendment. Outlawed gender discrimination in the workplace under Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act, signed into law by President Johnson in 1964.
Read more about civil rights
https://brainly.com/question/1142564
#SPJ1
Great Britain and the United States almost went to a war between in the 1840s because of a dispute over
Answer:
What dispute between Great Britain and the United States almost led to a war between those two countries in the 1840s? They disagreed about the border between the Oregon territory and British Colombia.
please give me brainliest
Which sentence correctly explains the process and conditioWhy were most slaves in the New England colonies forced to work in harbors and households instead of on farms?
There was little farmland due to mountains and forests.
Slaves had to learn a new trade.
There were not enough skilled harvesters.
Slaves were skilled shipbuilders.ns needed for rain to form?
asp
Option B. The Slaves had to work on Harbors because Slaves had to learn a new trade.
What did the slaves do in New England?The slaves in New England were skilled people that had to learn trades and other forms of crafts.
They were known to have these skills because the area had various types of work.
Read more on slavery here:
https://brainly.com/question/9374853
#SPJ1
Each president's speech mentions soviet leader mikhail gorbachev. how do their statements about gorbachev contrast with one another? drag each tile to the correct box.
Some presidents saw Gorbachev as a person that has helped the Soviet Union to achieve transformation into a more humane place while others saw him as a person that was being influenced to adopt new principles.
Who is Gorbachev?He was the Soviet leader of the Soviet Union. He was the last leader that the people of the country had before the nation got to break away.
The Soviet union was known to have being different under him because he did not really believe in communism. He had a separate approach towards governance.
He believed that the Soviet Union needed to adapt and do away withy a ;lot of the stringent laws that they had.
Read more on Gorbachev here:
https://brainly.com/question/1286817
#SPJ1
What did Lincoln do to prepare for his duties as Commander-in-Chief?
a
He studied books on military strategy.
b
He watched videos about war on his iPad.
c
He had military strategist from West Point come and tutor him on war strategies.
d
He studied the war strategies of Napoleon Bonaparte.
Answer:
Explanation:
Discussion
The answer is A
B: ipads videos? How is that possible? Telegraph was as good as the technology got.
C: No he didn't. He was self taught. His learning began in 1861 and by 1862 he knew enough that he surpassed his generals in military strategy.
D: Maybe. But if he did, it would be part of A. He studied most the strategies of the generals in the North and South armies.
How would you explain the depth of hostility felt by many white americans toward the indians?
The depth of hostility felt by many white Americans toward the Indians The killing of a village of peaceful Indians for no other cause than hatred and xenophobia undoubtedly contributed to the high level of hostility toward Indians.
The Sand Creek Massacre in 1864 is a prime illustration of the animosity white men had toward Native Americans. When a cavalry came into a "camp of friendly Indians," they engaged in battle despite their best efforts to avoid it. Colonel Chivington, the commander of the cavalry, gave the order to invade this settlement, which led to the mutilation of Indian men, women, and even children.
Hatred was the prime reason for hostility towards Indians.
to learn more about hostility here
https://brainly.com/question/27290914
#SPJ4
What caused the literary digest to incorrectly predict that alfred landon would beat franklin roosevelt in the 1936 presidential election?
Its predictions were based on an unscientific straw poll, that caused the literary digest to incorrectly predict that Alfred Landon would beat franklin Roosevelt in the 1936 presidential election.
Alf Landon, a Republican, was projected by The Literary Digest to defeat incumbent Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt by a sizable majority in 1936.
This is on par with the worst polling blunder ever. It was also extremely well-known because it was a survey for the presidential election.
Landon lost to Roosevelt by a margin that was closer to a comfortable victory. Not only did The Literary Digest misjudge the outcome, but the survey was also wildly inaccurate.
The Literary Digest survey is well-known in the polling history books.
Before going any further, it is crucial to emphasize that this was not done on purpose.
The pollsters did not want their data to be used to deceive anyone. Unfortunately, the polling firms really weren't that good.
To learn more about Alfred Landon here
https://brainly.com/question/6296829
#SPJ4
Why was the world anti-slavery convention in london important to the women's movement?
The significance of the conference on the expansion of women's rights in America is what people will remember it for the most.
What was the world anti-slavery convention?In June 1840, the World Anti-Slavery Convention gathered in London. For a discussion on the subject of slavery, it brought together American and European abolitionist organizations. As its name implies, this convention may have influenced a global abolitionist movement. The convention's impact on the development of American women's rights, however, is what will be most recalled about it. Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott, two of the most significant figures in the early American women's rights movement, met for the first time and joined forces in friendship and protest at the convention.
Learn more about the world anti-slavery convention with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/807834
#SPJ4