whats 667453x765678-543

Equation f(x) = ax² + bx + c reveals its extreme value without needing to be altered.

The extreme value of this equation has a minimum or maximum at the point (h, k).

Explanation: The extreme value of a quadratic function is also known as the vertex of the parabola. The vertex is the highest or lowest point on the parabola, depending on the coefficient of the x² term. For a quadratic function of the form f(x) = ax² + bx + c, the vertex can be found using the formula: h = -b/2a and k = f(h) = a(h²) + b(h) + c. The value of h represents the x-coordinate of the vertex, while the value of k represents the y-coordinate of the vertex. The sign of the coefficient of the x² term determines whether the vertex is a minimum or maximum. If a > 0, the parabola opens upwards and the vertex is a minimum. If a < 0, the parabola opens downwards and the vertex is a maximum. Therefore, equation f(x) = ax² + bx + c reveals its extreme value without needing to be altered. The extreme value of this equation has a minimum or maximum at the point (h, k).

Know more about extreme value here:

https://brainly.com/question/30149628

#SPJ11

The roots of the quadratic equation are -4 and 4, and the equation can be written as f(x) = x^2 - 16.

The graph provided depicts a parabolic curve. In order to determine the roots of the corresponding quadratic equation, we need to identify the x-values where the graph intersects the x-axis. Since the scales on both axes are going "by 2's," we can estimate the x-values accordingly.

Based on the graph, it appears that the curve intersects the x-axis at x = -4 and x = 4. Therefore, these are the roots of the quadratic equation associated with the graph.

To express the equation in standard form, we can use the roots to form the factors: (x + 4)(x - 4). Expanding this expression yields x^2 - 16. Thus, the roots of the quadratic equation are -4 and 4, and the equation can be written as f(x) = x^2 - 16.

To learn more about quadratic equation :

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ11

Answer: 1086.396 inches squared

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there,

The area formula for an octagon is:

[tex]A=2s^{2} (1+\sqrt{2} )[/tex]

With "A" representing area and "S" representing side length.

You are given the side length, so just plug that in for "S" and input it into your calculator. It should look something like this:

[tex]A=2(15)^{2} (1+\sqrt{2} )\\[/tex]

A= 1086.396 inches squared.

I hope this helps.

Good luck :)

a. There are 26 options for each of the 6 letter spots, and 10 options for each of the 2 number spots, so the total number of possible passwords is 26^6 * 10^2 = 56,800,235,584,000.

b. Since there is only one correct password and there are a total of 26^6 * 10^2 possible passwords, the probability of guessing the correct password is 1/(26^6 * 10^2) = 1/56,800,235,584,000.

c. There are 26 options for the first letter spot, 26 options for the second letter spot, and so on, down to 26 options for the sixth letter spot. For the first number spot, there are 10 options, and for the second number spot, there are 9 options (since the number cannot be repeated). Therefore, the total number of possible passwords is 26^6 * 10 * 9 = 40,810,243,200.

d. Using the same logic as in part (c), the total number of possible passwords is 26^6 * 10 * 9, but now we must subtract the number of passwords where the digit 9 appears twice. There are 6 options for where the 9's can appear (the first and second number spots, the first and third number spots, etc.), and for each of these options, there are 26^6 * 1 * 8 = 4,398,046,848 passwords (26 options for each of the 6 letter spots, 1 option for the first 9, and 8 options for the second 9). Therefore, the total number of possible passwords is 26^6 * 10 * 9 - 6 * 4,398,046,848 = 39,150,220,352.

e. For the first letter spot, there are 26 options, for the second letter spot, there are 25 options (since we cannot reuse the letter from the first spot), and so on, down to 21 options for the sixth letter spot. For the first number spot, there are 10 options, and for the second number spot, there are 9 options. Therefore, the total number of possible passwords is 26 * 25 * 24 * 23 * 22 * 21 * 10 * 9 = 4,639,546,400.

Learn more about possible passwords  here:

https://brainly.com/question/30214499

#SPJ11

The correct option is (d) Alex.Therefore, Rachel will likely offer the best interest rates to Alex, who has a median credit score of 799.

Rachel's duty as a loan officer is to evaluate the credit scores of loan applicants. The table displays the credit scores of several loan applicants as reported by Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion. To identify to which customer Rachel is more likely to offer the best interest rates, Rachel must calculate the median score for each applicant. Leslie's median credit score is 775, Pat's is 774, Sam's is 720, and Alex's is 799. As a result, Alex is the most likely candidate to receive the best interest rate from Rachel as a loan officer.

The correct option is (d) Alex.Therefore, Rachel will likely offer the best interest rates to Alex, who has a median credit score of 799.

In conclusion, based on each applicant's median credit score, the most likely client to be offered the best interest rate is Alex.

To know more about interest rates visit:

brainly.com/question/28272078

#SPJ11

If v1 and v2 are eigenvectors of a, then resulting diagonal matrix is [tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-3\lambda&1&0\\0&7\lambda&2\end{array}\right][/tex]

The matrix A given to us is:

A = [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc}3&-12\\-2&7\end{array}\right][/tex]

We are also given two eigenvectors v₁ and v₂ of A, which are:

v₁ = [3 1]

v₂ = [2 1]

To diagonalize A, we need to find a diagonal matrix D and an invertible matrix P such that A = PDP⁻¹. In other words, we want to transform A into a diagonal matrix using a matrix P, and then transform it back into A using the inverse of P.

Since v₁ and v₂ are eigenvectors of A, we know that Av₁ = λ1v₁ and Av₂ = λ2v₂, where λ1 and λ2 are the corresponding eigenvalues. Using the matrix-vector multiplication, we can write this as:

A[v₁ v₂] = [v₁ v₂][λ1 0

0 λ2]

where [v₁ v₂] is a matrix whose columns are v₁ and v₂, and [λ1 0; 0 λ2] is the diagonal matrix with the eigenvalues λ1 and λ2.

Now, if we let P = [v₁ v₂] and D = [λ1 0; 0 λ2], we have:

A = PDP⁻¹

To verify this, we can compute PDP⁻¹ and see if it equals A. First, we need to find the inverse of P, which is simply:

P⁻¹ = [v₁ v₂]⁻¹

To find the inverse of a 2x2 matrix, we can use the formula:

[ a b ]

[ c d ]⁻¹ = 1/(ad - bc) [ d -b ]

[ -c a ]

Applying this formula to [v₁ v₂], we get:

[v₁ v₂]⁻¹ = 1/(3-2)[7 -12]

[-1 3]

Therefore, P⁻¹ = [7 -12; -1 3]. Now, we can compute PDP⁻¹ as:

PDP⁻¹ = [v₁ v₂][λ1 0; 0 λ2][v₁ v₂]⁻¹

= [3 2][λ1 0; 0 λ2][7 -12]

[-1 3]

Multiplying these matrices, we get:

PDP⁻¹ = [3λ1 2λ2][7 -12]

[-1 3]

Simplifying this expression, we get:

PDP⁻¹ = [tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-3\lambda&1&0\\0&7\lambda&2\end{array}\right][/tex]

Therefore, A = PDP⁻¹, which means that we have successfully diagonalized A using the eigenvectors v₁ and v₂.

To know more about eigenvectors here

https://brainly.com/question/30968941

#SPJ4

The probability that an infant selected at random from among those delivered at the hospital measures more than 23.5 inches is 0.0475 or approximately 4.75%. (option c).

To find the probability that an infant selected at random from among those delivered at the hospital measures more than 23.5 inches, we need to calculate P(X > 23.5). To do this, we first standardize the variable X by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation:

Z = (X - µ)/σ

In this case, we have:

Z = (23.5 - 20)/2.1 = 1.667

Next, we use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find the probability of Z being greater than 1.667. Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find that the probability of Z being less than 1.667 is 0.9525. Therefore, the probability of Z being greater than 1.667 is:

P(Z > 1.667) = 1 - P(Z < 1.667) = 1 - 0.9525 = 0.0475

Hence, the correct option is (c)

Therefore, we can conclude that it is relatively rare for an infant's length at birth to be more than 23.5 inches, given the mean and standard deviation of the distribution.

To know more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

The medical records of infants delivered at the Kaiser Memorial Hospital show that the infants' lengths at birth (in inches) are normally distributed with a mean of 20 and a standard deviation of 2.1. Find the probability that an infant selected at random from among those delivered at the hospital measures is more than 23.5 inches.

a. 0.0485

b. 0.1991

c. 0.0475

d. 0.9515

e. 0.6400

The expression that has a value of 2/3 is option A. (8+24) ÷ (12 × 4).

Finding the expression that has a value of 2/3, simplify each expression and see which one equals 2/3.

A. (8+24) ÷ (12 × 4) = 32 ÷ 48 = 2/3

B. 8+24÷12 x 4 = 8+2 x 4 = 8+8 = 16/12 ≠ 2/3

C. 8+(24 ÷12) x 4 = 8+2 x 4 = 8+8 = 16/12 ≠ 2/3

D. 8+24 ÷ (12x4) = 8+24 ÷ 48 = 8+1/2 = 16/2 ≠ 2/3

Therefore, the expression that has a value of 2/3 is A. (8+24) ÷ (12 × 4).

learn more about simplify: https://brainly.com/question/723406

#SPJ1

The value of (3u − v)(u − 3v) = -57 when uu = 8, uv = 7, and vv = 6.

To find the result of (3u - v)(u - 3v) when uu = 8, uv = 7, and vv = 6, we will first need to rewrite the given expressions in terms of u and v, and then simplify the expression.

Let u² = uu = 8, u*v = uv = 7, and v² = vv = 6. Now, let's expand the given expression:

(3u - v)(u - 3v) = (3u - v) * u - (3u - v) * 3v

Expanding and simplifying the terms, we get:

= 3u² - 9uv - uv + 3v² = 3(u² - 3uv - v²)

Now, let's substitute the given values of u², uv, and v² into the expression:

= 3(8 - 3(7) - 6) = 3(8 - 21 - 6) = 3(-19)

So, (3u - v)(u - 3v) equals -57 when uu = 8, uv = 7, and vv = 6.

To know more about simplify, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/18077355#

#SPJ11

From the circle the value of the variable x is 130 degree.

In the circle  we have to find the value of angle x and angle y

for the given circle there are two tangents which touches the circle at only point

In the figure a tangent and a line passing through the circle forms an angle x.

The measure of the arc opposite to the angle x is 180 degrees.

Now the sum of  angle x and fifty is equal to measure of the arc opposite to the angle x which is 180 degrees.

x+50=180

Subtract 50 from both sides:

x=180-50

When fifty is subtracted from one hundred eighty we get one hundred and thirty.

x=130 degrees

Hence, the value of the variable x is 130 degrees from the circle.

To learn more on Circles click:

https://brainly.com/question/11833983

#SPJ1

The ratio test for the series ∑n=1infinitynn4 shows that it converges.

To apply the ratio test, we evaluate the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of successive terms:

l = limn→[infinity]∣∣∣an+1/an∣∣∣

= limn→[infinity]∣∣∣(−8)(n+1)(n+1)4/n4(−8)nn4∣∣∣

= limn→[infinity]∣∣∣(n/n+1)4∣∣∣

Since the limit of the ratio is less than 1, the series converges absolutely by the ratio test.

Therefore the ratio test for the series ∑n=1infinitynn4 shows that it converges.

For more questions like Series click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/28167344

#SPJ11

True, when dividing a sample into subsamples, it is generally recommended to have a minimum sample size of 30 for each subsample. This guideline is based on the Central Limit Theorem, which states that the distribution of sample means approaches a normal distribution as the sample size increases.

With a sample size of 30 or more, the sampling distribution becomes reasonably close to a normal distribution, allowing for more accurate inferences and hypothesis testing.

Know more about the Central Limit Theorem,

https://brainly.com/question/18403552

#SPJ11

To determine how many erasers Ayita can buy for the same amount that she would pay for 2 notepads, we need to compare the costs of erasers and notepads.

The cost of one eraser is $0.05, and the cost of one notepad is $0.65.

Let's calculate the total cost for 2 notepads:

Total cost of 2 notepads = 2 * $0.65 = $1.30

To find out how many erasers Ayita can buy for the same amount, we can divide the total cost of 2 notepads by the cost of one eraser:

Number of erasers Ayita can buy = Total cost of 2 notepads / Cost of one eraser

Number of erasers = $1.30 / $0.05 = 26

Therefore, Ayita can buy 26 erasers for the same amount that she would pay for 2 notepads.

#SPJ11

The percent of the 7th grade students in favor of school uniforms is 42.9%

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The table of values (see attachment)

From the table, we have

7th grade students = 112

7th grade students in favor = 48

So, we have

Percentage = 48/112 *100%

Evaluate

Percentage = 42.9%

Hence, the percentage in favor is 42.9%

Read more about percentage at

https://brainly.com/question/843074

#SPJ4

Thus,  the average cost per unit for an output of q units is given by the equation c/q = 12000/q + 7, where the fixed cost is $12,000 and the variable cost is given by the function cv = 7q.

The given equation for the total cost of producing q units of a product is c = 5000 + 6q.

To find the average cost per unit for an output of q units, we need to divide the total cost by the number of units produced.

Thus, the average cost per unit can be written as c/q.

Substituting the given equation for c in terms of q, we get

c/q = (5000 + 6q)/q.

Simplifying this expression, we get c/q = 5000/q + 6.

Now, we are given that the fixed cost is $12,000 and the variable cost is given by the function cv = 7q.

The total cost equation c can be written as the sum of the fixed cost and the variable cost, i.e., c = 12000 + cv. Substituting the given equation for cv, we get c = 12000 + 7q.

Substituting this equation for c in terms of q in the expression we derived earlier for c/q, we get c/q = (12000 + 7q)/q. Simplifying this expression, we get c/q = 12000/q + 7.

Therefore, the average cost per unit for an output of q units is given by the equation c/q = 12000/q + 7, where the fixed cost is $12,000 and the variable cost is given by the function cv = 7q.

Know more about the average cost

https://brainly.com/question/29509552

#SPJ11

The cost of putting a fence around a square field is ₹2.50 per meter. The cost of fencing around the square field is ₹200.To find: The length of each side of the field.

Solution:  Let the length of each side of the square field be "a".The perimeter of a square is given by the formula P = 4a.The cost of fencing around a square field is given as ₹2.50 per metre.The cost of fencing around the square field is ₹200.The formula for the cost of fencing is given by the formula:

C = length × cost per unit

⇒ Cost of fencing = perimeter × cost per unit

= 4a × ₹2.50/metre

= ₹10a

According to the given details, the cost of fencing is ₹200.

So, we can write the equation as:

10a = 200

Dividing both sides by 10, we get:

a = 20 meters

Therefore, the length of each side of the square field is 20 meters. Hence, the required answer is:

The length of each side of the field is 20 meters.

To know more about  length visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32060888

#SPJ11

Based on the above, the equation of the parabola shown in the graph is x=y²/8+y/2+9/2

Note that based on the question, we were given:

The Standard equation of parabola is one that is given by:

(y - k)2 = 4p (x - h)

Note also that:

Hence, by comparing the similarities of the give value with the one above:

(h + p, k)= (6,-2)

k=-2

h+p=6

h=6-p

Hence: directrix: x=h-p

h-p=2

So by Plugging  the value of h=6-p into the above equation:

6-p-p=2

6-2p=2

-2p=2-6

-2p=-4

p=-4/-2

p=2

Plugging p=2 into h-p=2, it will be:

h=2+p

h=2+2

h=4

By plugging k=-2, p=2, h=4 in standard equation of parabola will be:

(y - k)2 = 4p (x - h)

(y-(-2))² = 4(2) (x - 4)

(y+2)² = 8 (x - 4)

y2+4y+4=8x-32

y2+4y+4+32=8x

x=y²/8+4y/8+36/8

x=y²/8+y/2+9/2

Learn more about parabola  from

https://brainly.com/question/13008846

#SPJ1

The Niagara Falls incline railway rises vertically by approximately 98 feet.

The angle of elevation of 30° indicates the angle between the incline railway and the horizontal ground. The total length of the incline railway is given as 196 feet.

To find the vertical rise, we can use trigonometry. The vertical rise can be determined by calculating the sine of the angle of elevation and multiplying it by the total length of the incline railway:

Vertical rise = Total length × sine(angle of elevation)

Vertical rise = 196 ft × sin(30°)

Vertical rise ≈ 196 ft × 0.5

Vertical rise ≈ 98 ft

Therefore, the Niagara Falls incline railway rises vertically by approximately 98 feet.

You can learn more about Niagara Falls at

https://brainly.com/question/12736955

#SPJ11

So these 2 angles equal 180 degrees.

Angle 1 + Angle 2 = 180 degrees.

The problem tells us that angle 1 is 6x, and angle 2 is (x+26).

Substitute those into our equation.

6x + (x+26) = 180.

Now let's solve for x.

7x + 26 = 180

7x = 154

x = 22

Now go back and substitute x=22 into the info we were given.

Angle 1 = 6x = 6(22) = 132 degrees.

Angle 2 = (x+26) = (22+26) = 48 degrees.

Let's do a quick check - - - angle 1 and angle 2 should add to 180!

132 + 48 = 180.

The expected frequency for each category would be 25. So, option c. 25 is the correct answer.

If you have 100 respondents identifying their region of residence (i.e., north, south, midwest, or west), the expected frequency for each category would be:d. 50

The expected frequency for each category can be calculated by assuming that each category is equally likely to be chosen. Since there are four regions (north, south, midwest, and west) and 100 respondents in total, we can divide the total number of respondents by the number of categories to obtain the expected frequency for each category.

Expected frequency = Total number of respondents / Number of categories

Expected frequency = 100 / 4

Expected frequency = 25

To learn more about  frequency click here:

brainly.com/question/32201690

#SPJ11

The value of the expression 2(cos 45°sin 45° + tan²30°) is 5/3.

Let's evaluate the given expression :

cos 45° = √2/2 (This is a standard value for cosine of 45 degrees.)

sin 45° = √2/2 (This is a standard value for sine of 45 degrees.)

tan 30° = sin 30° / cos 30° = (1/2) / (√3/2) = √3/3 (This is a standard value for tangent of 30 degrees.)

Now, let's substitute these values back into the original expression:

2(cos 45°sin 45° + tan²30°)

= 2(√2/2 * √2/2 + (√3/3)²)

= 2(1/2 + 3/9)

= 2(1/2 + 1/3)

= 2(3/6 + 2/6)

= 2(5/6)

= 10/6

= 5/3

Therefore, the value of the expression 2(cos 45°sin 45° + tan²30°) is 5/3.

For such more questions on value

https://brainly.com/question/7331447

#SPJ8

False.  in minimizing a unimodal function of one variable by golden section search,the point discarded at each iteration is always thepoint having the largest function value

In minimizing a unimodal function of one variable by golden section search, the point discarded at each iteration is always the one that leads to the smallest interval containing the minimum. This is achieved by comparing the function values at two points that divide the interval into two subintervals of equal length, and discarding the one with the larger function value. This process is repeated until the interval becomes sufficiently small, and the point with the smallest function value within that interval is taken as the minimum.

Know more about unimodal function here;

https://brainly.com/question/31322721

#SPJ11

The pair x(t) = e^3t, y(t) = e^t is a solution to the given system.

The given system consists of two differential equations: dx/dt = 3y^3 and dy/dt = y. We are given the pair x(t) = e^3t and y(t) = e^t. To verify if this pair is a solution, we need to substitute these values into the differential equations and check if they hold true.

Substituting x(t) = e^3t and y(t) = e^t into the first equation, we have dx/dt = 3(e^t)^3. Simplifying, we get dx/dt = 3e^(3t).

Similarly, substituting x(t) = e^3t and y(t) = e^t into the second equation, we have dy/dt = e^t.

We can see that both sides of the differential equations match the given pair (x(t), y(t)). Hence, x(t) = e^3t and y(t) = e^t satisfy the given system of differential equations.

To sketch the trajectory of the given solution in the phase plane, we can plot the points (x(t), y(t)) for different values of t. The trajectory would represent the path traced by the solution in the phase plane.

Learn more about the phase planes

brainly.com/question/9829913

#SPJ11

Therefore, the SUBSET-SUM problem can be reduced to the PARTITION problem in polynomial time. Since SUBSET-SUM is NP-complete, it follows that PARTITION is also NP-complete.

a. Verifier for PARTITION problem:

Given an input (S, U, V) where S is a set of integers and U, V are partitions of S, we can verify in polynomial time whether the sum of elements in U is equal to the sum of elements in V. Therefore, PARTITION is in NP.

b. Reduction from SUBSET-SUM to PARTITION:

To show that PARTITION is NP-complete, we need to show that it is both in NP and NP-hard. We have already shown that it is in NP. Now we will reduce the SUBSET-SUM problem to PARTITION.

Given an instance of the SUBSET-SUM problem, which is a set of integers S = {a1, a2, ..., an} and a target integer T, we can construct an instance of the PARTITION problem as follows:

Let S' = S U {2T} and let U and V be two partitions of S' such that the sum of elements in U is equal to the sum of elements in V. We can easily verify that such partitions exist if and only if there exists a subset of S whose sum is equal to T.

If there exists a subset of S whose sum is equal to T, then we can add 2T to that subset and obtain two partitions of S' with equal sums. Conversely, if we have two partitions of S' with equal sums, then we can remove 2T from the partition that contains it to obtain a subset of S with sum T.

To know more about polynomial,

https://brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ11

We may need to consider other methods of estimation, such as maximum likelihood estimation or Bayesian estimation

To estimate the parameter θ using the method of moments, we first find the first moment of the distribution in terms of the parameter θ, and then set it equal to the sample mean. Solving for θ gives us our estimate.

For this problem, the first moment of the distribution with density Ox®-1 is:

E[X] = ∫x(Ox®-1)dx from 0 to 1

= ∫x^(2-1)dx from 0 to 1

= ∫x dx from 0 to 1

= 1/2

Setting this equal to the sample mean of the three observations X1 = 0.4, X2 = 0.7, and X3 = 0.9, we have:

1/2 = (X1 + X2 + X3)/3

Solving for the sample mean, we get:

(X1 + X2 + X3)/3 = 1/2

X1 + X2 + X3 = 3/2

Substituting the sample values, we have:

0.4 + 0.7 + 0.9 = 3/2

Simplifying, we get:

2 = 3/2

This is clearly not true, so there must be some mistake in our calculations. Checking our work, we see that the first moment of the distribution is actually undefined since the integral diverges as x approaches 1. Therefore, we cannot use the method of moments to estimate the parameter θ in this case.

We may need to consider other methods of estimation, such as maximum likelihood estimation or Bayesian estimation

To know more about Bayesian estimation refer here

https://brainly.com/question/28387181#

#SPJ11

In the given relationship, the independent variable is the number of books ordered, and the dependent variable is the cost to join the book club.

Now, let's answer the questions:

1. What is the independent variable in this relationship?

  Answer: The independent variable is the number of books ordered.

2. What is the dependent variable in this relationship?

  Answer: The dependent variable is the cost to join the book club.

3. What is the fixed cost in this relationship?

  Answer: The fixed cost is $5.00 per month, which is the cost to join the book club.

4. What is the variable cost in this relationship?

  Answer: The variable cost is $2.50 for every book ordered.

5. Write an equation to represent the relationship between the number of books ordered (x) and the cost to join the book club (y).

  Answer: The equation is y = 5 + 2.50x, where y represents the cost and x represents the number of books ordered.

To know more about number visit:

brainly.com/question/3589540

#SPJ11

To find out how many miles apart the school and the park are, we need to convert the distance from kilometers to miles.

Given that there are 1.6 km in a mile, we can set up a conversion factor:

1 mile = 1.6 km

Now, we can calculate the distance in miles by dividing the distance in kilometers by the conversion factor:

Distance in miles = Distance in kilometers / Conversion factor

Distance in miles = 6 km / 1.6 km/mile

Simplifying the expression:

Distance in miles = 3.75 miles

Therefore, the school and the park are approximately 3.75 miles apart.

To know more about distance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28828943

#SPJ11

The 95% confidence interval is 1.23 to 1.51

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Sample, n = 22

Mean, x = 1.37 oz

Standard deviation, s = 0.33 oz

Start by calculating the margin of error using

E = s/√n

So, we have

E = 0.33/√22

E = 0.07

The 95% confidence interval is

CI = x ± zE

Where

z = 1.96 i.e. z-score at 95% CI

So, we have

CI = 1.37 ± 1.96 * 0.07

Evaluate

CI = 1.37 ± 0.14

This gives

CI = 1.23 to 1.51

Hence, the 95% confidence interval is 1.23 to 1.51

Read more about confidence interval at

https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ4

The projection of w onto each vector in the basis is -v1 - 5v2 + 4v3.

We can use the orthogonal projection formula to find the coordinates of w with respect to the basis {v1, v2, v3}.

The coordinates of w are given by:

w1 = ⟨w, v1⟩ / ⟨v1, v1⟩ = -3/3 = -1

w2 = ⟨w, v2⟩ / ⟨v2, v2⟩ = -40/8 = -5

w3 = ⟨w, v3⟩ / ⟨v3, v3⟩ = 64/16 = 4

So, the coordinates of w with respect to the basis {v1, v2, v3} are (-1, -5, 4).

To find the projection of w onto each vector in the basis, we can use the formula for orthogonal projection:

proj_v1(w) = ⟨w, v1⟩ / ⟨v1, v1⟩ × v1 = (-3/3) × v1 = -v1

proj_v2(w) = ⟨w, v2⟩ / ⟨v2, v2⟩ × v2 = (-40/8) × v2 = -5v2

proj_v3(w) = ⟨w, v3⟩ / ⟨v3, v3⟩ × v3 = (64/16) × v3 = 4v3

The projection of w onto each vector in the basis is -v1 - 5v2 + 4v3.

For similar questions on vector

https://brainly.com/question/15519257

#SPJ11

The norm of vector w in span(v1, v2, v3) is ||w|| = 13.

Given an orthogonal set of vectors v1, v2, v3 in R^5, and a vector w in the span of v1, v2, v3, we are provided with the inner products between v1, v2, v3, and w.

To find the norm of vector w, we use the formula:

||w|| = sqrt(⟨w, w⟩)

We are given the inner products between w and v1, v2, v3:

⟨w, v1⟩ = -3

⟨w, v2⟩ = -40

⟨w, v3⟩ = 64

The norm of w can be computed as follows:

||w|| = sqrt((-3)^2 + (-40)^2 + 64^2)

      = sqrt(9 + 1600 + 4096)

      = sqrt(5705)

      ≈ 13

Therefore, the norm of vector w in the span of v1, v2, v3 is approximately 13.

To learn more about orthogonal set click here

brainly.com/question/27749918

#SPJ11

The angular velocity of the wheel at the beginning of the 4.50-s interval was 19.125 rad/s.To find the angular velocity at the beginning of the 4.50-s interval, we can use the formula:

ω = ω₀ + αt

where:
ω = final angular velocity
ω₀ = initial angular velocity (what we're trying to find)
α = angular acceleration (given as 2.25 rad/s²)
t = time interval (given as 4.50 s)

Plugging in the values, we get:

ω = ω₀ + αt
30.0 rad/s = ω₀ + (2.25 rad/s²)(4.50 s)

Simplifying and solving for ω₀, we get:

ω₀ = 30.0 rad/s - (2.25 rad/s²)(4.50 s)
ω₀ = 19.125 rad/s

Therefore, the angular velocity of the wheel at the beginning of the 4.50-s interval was 19.125 rad/s.

Learn more about angular velocity:

https://brainly.com/question/29557272

#SPJ11