Answer:
I'd say operating a successful business in the United States.
Which of the following shows the correct categories of personnel in the United States Navy?
Admiral, Midshipman, Yeoman
Emperor, Moff, Grand Moff
Enlisted, Commissioned, Chief Warrant
Apprentice, Petty, Commissioned
PLS ANSWER SOON I WILL GIVE BRAINLY
Answer: Cheif Warrant
Answer:
United States Navy Ranks In Order
This table of the United States Navy ranks from lowest to highest shows the Navy's rank structure from lowest to highest including rank insignia, abbreviation, and rank classification.
The United States Navy has twenty six grades of enlisted seamen and officers, with most seamen enlisting at the entry-level rank of Seaman Recruit (SR, paygrade E-1). The highest rank achievable in the Navy is Fleet Admiral.
Students who finish their homework after school are meeting
normative and short-term goals.
normative and long-term goals.
intrapersonal and short-term goals.
intrapersonal and long-term goals.
Answer:
intrapersonal and short-term goals
Answer:
its the third one
Explanation:
#plato
Imagine you're driving on a 4-lane highway and you see that a police officer has another car pulled to the side of the road. How should you react? What law would you be following? Give 2 other situations that would be covered by this law. How would you react differently if you were on a 2-lane road? (Write your answer with complete sentences, correct capitalization and punctuation.)
Answer:
I would keep going. I don't want to get caught up in anything that i was not a part of. I would be following just my gut feeling. I would do the same on a two lane road. Like Albert Einstein said that intelligent people ignore.
Explanation:
What is the difference between being detained and arrested?
Based on due process, which of these instructions would a judge give to the jury in a criminal trial?
Request a retrial if testimony is unclear,
Disregard evidence in closing arguments
Presume the accused is innocent
Give a preference for the trial location
HELPO
Answer:
The Court has held that practically all the criminal procedural guarantees of the Bill of Rights—the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments—are fundamental to state criminal justice systems and that the absence of one or the other particular guarantees denies a suspect or a defendant due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment.1077 In addition, the Court has held that the Due Process Clause protects against practices and policies that violate precepts of fundamental fairness,1078 even if they do not violate specific guarantees of the Bill of Rights.1079 The standard query in such cases is whether the challenged practice or policy violates “a fundamental principle of liberty and justice which inheres in the very idea of a free government and is the inalienable right of a citizen of such government.”1080
Answer:
....
Explanation:
The government can take your property for
Answer:
tax fraud
Explanation:
At least how many insurance companies should you compare for quotes?
4
3
2
1
At least 3 for starters.
What U.S. Supreme Court case confirmed that a basic “stop and frisk” for officer safety (search for weapons) is not a violation of the 4th amendment?
Answer:
Terry v. Ohio
Explanation:
Because the conduct witnessed by the police officer reasonably led him to believe that an armed robbery was in prospect, he was as reasonably led to believe that the men were armed and probably dangerous and that his safety required a “frisk.” Because the object of the “frisk” is the discovery of dangerous weapons, “it must therefore be confined in scope to an intrusion reasonably designed to discover guns, knives, clubs, or other hidden instruments for the assault of the police officer.”
Using an amount of force that is beyond that which is reasonably necessary.
Answer:
The amount of force necessary to protect oneself or one's property. A person is generally justified in using force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm if the person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
Explanation:
Use of force. Hope this helps!
Answer:
“Use of Force” law has applications in both in civil and criminal contexts. Established principles give civilians the right to apply force to the person of another and to engage in violence for the sole purpose of defending one’s own life or the life of a third party from physical harm, great bodily injury, and/or even death.
What Is Force?
Force is any verbal or physical action taken to control, restrain, or stop another. If you make physical contact with another person in order to stop, disable, injure, or inflict great bodily injury, or even to kill them, your actions will be reviewed to determine if you acted as a “reasonable person” (see below for definition). In the context of this book, we address force used to keep you free from physical and emotional harm, serious bodily injury, or death. Generally, a person may lawfully react in self-defense, but only if she uses an amount of force that is reasonable to maintain her safety.
If this incident happened in your neighborhood, do you think the officer would give you a citation? Explain
Edit: Ticket
Answer:
There were a variety of reasons for this failure, many connected to general weaknesses within the organization, such as voting structure that made ratifying resolutions difficult and incomplete representation among world nations. Additionally, the power of the League was limited by the United States' refusal to join.Finally, the League's greatest weakness came from the fact that it was set up by the Treaty of Versailles. The Treaty had many flaws (for example, reparations) – but the League was supposed to enforce it. Also, the Treaty was hated, especially by the Germans and the Americans, so the League was hated too.The League of Nations came into being after the end of World War One. The League of Nation's task was simple – to ensure that war never broke out again. After the turmoil caused by the Versailles Treaty, many looked to the League to bring stability to the world. America entered World War One in 1917.The Fourteen Points were a proposal made by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson in a speech before Congress on January 8, 1918, outlining his vision for ending World War I in a way that would prevent such a conflagration from occurring again.Without its own military force and a guarantee that member states would offer support, it lacked any power to prevent aggression. This would soon be exploited by nations such as Japan and Italy.If this incident happened in your neighborhood, do you think the officer would give you a citation? Explain
Edit: TicketPrivacy is a growing concern in the United States and around the world. The spread of the Internet and the seemingly boundaryless options for collecting, saving, sharing, and comparing information trigger consumer worries. Online practices of business and government agencies may present new ways to compromise privacy, and e-commerce and technologies that make a wide range of personal information available to anyone with a Web browser only begin to hint at the possibilities for inappropriate or unwarranted intrusion into our personal lives. Engaging Privacy and Information Technology in a Digital Age presents a comprehensive and multidisciplinary examination of privacy in the information age. It explores such important concepts as how the threats to privacy evolving, how can privacy be protected and how society can balance the interests of individuals, businesses and government in ways that promote privacy reasonably and effectively? This book seeks to raise awareness of the web of connectedness among the actions one takes and the privacy policies that are enacted, and provides a variety of tools and concepts with which debates over privacy can be more fruitfully engaged. Engaging Privacy and Information Technology in a Digital Age focuses on three major components affecting notions, perceptions, and expectations of privacy: technological change, societal shifts, and circumstantial discontinuities.
All of these gathering and analysis activities have been altered in basic ways by functional advancements in the technologies that have become available for collecting, storing, and manipulating data.
In actual practice, these categories can overlap or the activities in each category can occur in several temporal sequences. When a police officer observes someone breaking a law, the officer is determining that a law has been violated, gathering information about who broke the law (presumably the person he or she is observing), and gaining evidence that may be introduced in court (the testimony of the officer).
The essential difference between these categories is the locus or subject about which the information is gathered. In the first category concerning the breaking of a law, the locus of information is the event or activity. In the second sort of activity, the locus is the determination of an individual or set of individuals involved in the activity. In the third category, information associated with categories one and two are combined in an attempt to link the two in a provable way.
Although activities in the first category usually precede those in the second, this is not always the case. Law enforcement authorities have been known to start with “suspicious people” and then seek to discover what laws they might have broken, might be breaking, or might be planning to break. This is one of the rationales for certain kinds of undercover activity and is frequently regarded as more controversial.
These distinctions are important because they help to differentiate cases that generate concern about invasions of privacy from those that involve less controversial uses of the state’s investigatory power.
I HOPE THIS HELPS YOU! :31. What are some of the things the team at the Forensic Anthropology Lab is able to determine by
studying bones?
2. Based on the individuals remains discussed in the video, explain how Dr. Ann Ross and her team
were able to determine the person died violently?
3. Explain how researchers obtained information about the individual's race, sex, height, and
connection with the local area?
Answer:
1. What are some of the things the team at the Forensic Anthropology Lab is able to determine by studying bones?
Some of the things they are able to determine are what kind of prenatal environment they may have had, what kind of childhood they may have had, if it affected their stature, if it affected their dentition, their diet, and even their climate sometimes
2. Based on the individual’s remains discussed in the video, explain how Dr. Ann Ross and her team were able to determine the person died violently?
Due to the damage done to the skull—they found bullet holes. They then passed this information on to the authorities
3. Explain how researchers obtained information about the individual’s race, sex, height and connection with the local area?
They analyzed what they found. They measured, and compared the bones to find the individual’s race, sex, height, and location .
Explanation:
Answer:
1. Some of the things they are able to determine by studying the bones are what kind of prenatal environment they may have had, what kind of childhood they may have had, if it affected their stature, if it affected their dentition, their diet, and even their climate sometimes.
2. Dr. Ann Ross and her team found the three entrance gunshot wounds on the skull.
3. Researchers had analyzed what they found. They measured, and compared the bones to find the individual’s race, gender, height, and location. The pelvic bones indicate the victim was male. The femur indicates that the victim was about five feet five inches tall, correlating to the population of Chile. The victim’s missing teeth indicated poor nutrition. A fusing of the base of the spine indicated he suffered from the early stages of spina bifida, which correlates to poor pre-natal health.
Explanation:
edg
Is a jury permitted to convict a defendant solely based upon circumstantial evidence?
Answer:
Depends.
Explanation:
If that's enough to make the jury think that they are guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt then yes. If they have even the smallest doubt in their mind, then no.
5.1.4 quiz: What is the primary goal of interest groups?
A. Replacing lawmakers through special elections
B. Pursuing lawsuits against the government
C. providing health care for their members
D. Changing or maintaining particular policies
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Changing or maintaining particular policies is the primary goal of interest groups.
please help me with number 4. thanks!
Answer:
If a school is implementing a testing strategy, testing should be offered on a voluntary basis. It is unethical and illegal to test someone who does not want to be tested, including students whose parents or guardians do not want them to be tested.
What should you talk to your family members and friends about when considering car insurance providers?
Check ALL which apply.
1.What color is their car?
2.What car do they drive?
3.Are they satisfied with their rates?
4.How long have they been with the company?
which of the following type of government accepts cultural equality?
feudalism
dictatorship
democracy
autocracy
Answer:
c
Explanation:
democracy accepts equality of culture
Brainliest cause no one seems to answer questions if one isn't promised
Which of the following is not a way to become eligible for naturalization in the United States?
serving in the U.S. military
residing in the United States for a number of years
operating a successful business in the United States
marrying a U.S. citizen
Answer:
operating a successful business in the United states
Explanation:
Answer:
it is operating a successful business in the united states
Explanation:
pls mark as brainliest
A man’s family is held hostage while he is made to rob a bank. What is the best legal defense?
Describe the preamble of the constitution
Answer:
The preamble sets the stage for the Constitution. It clearly communicates the intentions of the framers and the purpose of the document. The preamble is an introduction to the highest law of the land; it is not the law. It does not define government powers or individual rights.
Explanation:
Hope this helped, Have a Wonderful Day!!
Briefly describe federalism and include two examples of delegated powers (national), concurrent powers (shared), and reserved powers (state) in your explanation. In addition, what is one positive and one negative aspect of federalism?
Answer:
Federalism is an institutional arrangement that creates two relatively autonomous levels of government, each possessing the capacity to act directly on behalf of the people with the authority granted to it by the national constitution. Although today’s federal systems vary in design, five structural characteristics are common to the United States and other federal systems around the world, including Germany and Mexico.
Explanation:
BRAINLIEST!!
Why should the process of becoming a citizen require work?
Answer:
I assume you are talking about the legal naturalization process.
Explanation:
Naturalization is the legal process a non-U.S. citizen undergoes to become a citizen of the United States. A person can become a citizen of the United States through one of the following ways: Through the naturalization process. By deriving citizenship from his or her parent when the parent naturalizes.
These legal requirements help the immigration service ensure that only those people who are sincere in their desire to become U.S. citizens become naturalized.
now gimme brainliest >:3
Answer:
I will let the other person get brainliest.
Explanation:
The Stolen Valor Act dealt with lies that were told about
Answer:
to fraudulently claim to be a recipient of certain military decorations or medals in order to obtain money, property, or other tangible benefit.
Explanation:
The Stolen Valor Act dealt with lies that were told about oneself. Hence, option B is correct.
What is Stolen Valor Act?
The stolen act was signed by the president George W. Bush, in the year 2006. It crated the US law that provided the provisions to the unauthorized wear, manufacture, or sale of any military decorations and medals.
Falsely representing oneself as having received any American military decoration or medal became a criminal offense under the statute.
Therefore, option B is correct.
A prosecuting attorney begins with an explanation of the circumstances of the case. What part of the trial is this?
am i so confused why is abortion not illegal??????!!!!!!!!
"So the adults don't give them an awful life or they don't have the money to take care of the child, or they just don't want it" there is a thing called adoption!!!!!! it should be illegal..
Answer:
well in some places abortion is depends on the state
Take Alabama as an example. In May, Alabama’s governor signed into law a draconian bill that could punish doctors who perform abortions with life in prison. But in practice abortion is already inaccessible for many people in Alabama Arizona California and many more states so it really depends where you live but i want abortion to be illegal because they made the choice to have the baby so yeh
Robert Key’s group medical insurance coverage costs $6,480 a year. His employer, Covington Arts Center, pays 65% of the cost. What is his monthly paycheck deduction for medical insurance?
Answer:i have a big test
Explanation:
pls let me have these ccoins i beg
I Need help with this part!!
Science work
Earth/environmental review packet
Do we need a wall? Discuss the pros and cons. Explain your reasoning and defend your position.
Answer:
pros and cons
Explanation:
pro - decreased illegal immigration (can cut it up to half depending on security and population)
pro - financial costs of illegal immigration will drop as inmates from crossing will be decreased
pro - decreased scale of illegal imports
pro - national security increased
pro - immigrants are more likely to use real ways of safely getting into the US legally
pro - patrolling is much easier and border security will be less needed so funds can go to other opportunities of financial aid.
Con - Construction costs can be billions not including the extra patrol and stations that will be necessary
con - will most likely harm relationship between mexico.
con - animal wild life will be greatly disturbed in the area
con - Low unemployment rates and rising minimum wages has created a shortage in labor-intensive jobs that American citizens don’t want to do.
con - It gives a false sense of security, as taller ladders and digging under the fence can allow illegals to get past the wall ( will still be more difficult however)
i believe straining mexico for the costs of the wall is a bad idea and of course should come from our budget, and a wall could be very efficient as we can then focus more on bringing people up with overstaying their visas (which is te most common way illegal immigrants come in)
Answer:
im 4nothavingit but i think we need a wall to keep jobs open to tax paying civilians and not let cheap companies have easy illegal labor
Explanation:
Pro- job openings
Cons- some people dont get help who could die just trying to get here without paperwork anyway.
im aware this is not all the facts- thats why you have the other guy...
Officer Smith is out patrolling his beat on foot (foot patrol). He notices 2 young men matching the description of 2 suspects that earlier in the day committed a home invasion. During the home invasion, a Rolex watch was taken, as was an expensive leather jacket and some electronics. As Officer Smith approaches the suspects, he notices one of them wearing a costly looking leather coat. Additionally, as he began questioning them he observed the other male subject wearing what looked to be an expensive gold watch.
Answer: How did Smith know what the suspects look like? Did someone see the two suspects go into the owner's house? If so who seen them? did they report it to the police? If so at what time, and what time is it now? Did the suspects leave any clues? like if it was raining there would be foot prints. Unless if they took off there shoes and had no socks on you can still tell who it is. people's toes have prints on them just like your fingers. If the suspects did not leave evidence Smith should look closely at their clothing to make sure they do not have a weapon on them. Then he should confront them and ask questions. He should tell them "there was a robbery today" then ask them if they know anything about it. If they say no tell them everything that was stolen tell them if they tell you can cross them off of the people who the police suspect. It may be a bluff but they do not know that. When they tell you where they got it wright it down and tell them thank you for your coroporation.Go to the stores they said they got it from. You may need a warrant if their story does not match up go find the suspect confront them and ask why they lied. and so on
Explanation:
Tina has been drinking while attending a party at a friends house. She is then attacked
with severe violence by an individual who was attended the party as well. In order to
escape, Tina hopped in her car and drove down the street where she was pulled over by
the police and booked with a DWI offense. She can claim the defense
of
Duress
Insanity
Necessity
Entrapment
Answer:
entrapment
Explanation:
How can American citizens participate in democracy?