Which of the following practices of Ivan the Great were inspired by Byzantine culture? Select all that apply.

The Via Sacra was the main street of ancient Rome, which ran through the roman forum.

From the top of Capitoline Hill, via some of the most significant religious monuments of the Forum (where it is the widest roadway), and on to the Colosseum, the Via Sacra served as ancient Rome's principal thoroughfare.

The road was a section of the ancient route of the Roman Triumph, which started outside the city and passed by the Roman Forum. The road served as the backdrop for many of Rome's historical triumphs and tragedies, as well as the somber religious celebrations, the great victories of victorious generals, and the daily crowd gathering in the basilicas to converse, gamble, conduct business, or obtain justice. Later, it was paved, and under Nero, it was bordered by colonnades.

To learn more about ancient Roman roads here,

https://brainly.com/question/12655053

#SPJ4

Therefore, what describes Seabury is:

Know more about Samuel Seabury here:

https://brainly.com/question/12860357

#SPJ4

Two recent periods of large-scale bureaucratic expansion were the 1930s and the 1960s. the 1930s and the 1960s the 1920s and the 1980s. This is further explained below.

Generally, The decision-making process is effectively slowed down due to the systems and procedures that have been put into place. They were developed with the purpose of preserving order and consistency across the organization. In the context of governments and other big organizations, such as businesses, the term "bureaucracy" refers to the systems that are often put in place.

In conclusion, The 1930s through the 1960s were decades that saw significant increases in bureaucratic activity on a broad scale. the 1920s and the 1980s, and the 1930s and the 1960s respectively.

Read more about bureaucratic activity

https://brainly.com/question/7523115

#SPJ1

The Term Recognized is defined as gaining political and legal validity from other nations, hence establishing political relations with another nation.

Recognition of A Nation In International Law, Recognition of a State is very important for establishing a legal relationship with other states in matters of business or Military alliance.

By Recognition, International Law suggests a legal validity to diplomatic relations by gaining recognition of being a State or Government from another 'recognized' state.

Learn more about Nation here:

brainly.com/question/25192887

#SPJ1

Answer: A) Establishing political relationships with another nation

Explanation: Did the test, hope this helps, keep up the work my guy.

The two cities that were recognized as the cultural capitals of Islam in the Middle Ages were Baghdad and Cordoba.

Baghdad in present-day Iraq was the capital of Islamic culture and opulence thanks to being a center of trade.

The Uma-yyads in Spain also built Cordoba to be a major cultural center for Islam.

Find out more on the Uma-yyads at https://brainly.com/question/1365279.

#SPJ1

The systemic level of analysis describes the argument that through interaction, the United States and the Soviet Union came to see each other as enemies, not rivals.

The results of an investigation at the systemic level, which takes into account all states, are explained.

By taking into account the characteristics or organisational structure of the international political system during the time under investigation, it looks for answers for global events.

Some key features of systemic level of analysis are-

The tension between the Soviet Union and the US resolved as-

To know more about three levels of analysis, here

https://brainly.com/question/14725298

#SPJ4

The picture provided is Mahendra Singh of Patiala, his other name is Mohinder Singh. He was the Maharaja of Patiala in the Subcontinent.

Subcontinent was a part in Asia, in present world it is known as India and Pakistan and Bangladesh. The areas of these three countries were cumulatively known as the Sub continent as the three countries were amalgamated into one before the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947.

Mahendra Singh Patiala was born in 1852 and died in 1876, He was only 23 years old when he died. He ruled the area known as Patiala at a very young age. He started ruling the Patiala at the age of 10 in the year 1862, and kept ruling until his last breath in the year 1876.

Mahendra Singh was famous for his ruling the Patiala since he was a child.

Learn more about Subcontinent at https://brainly.com/question/27163855

#SPJ1

Answer:

D. No, it is too subjective

Explanation:

its like when a restaurant says they have the best pizza in the world

its more like an opinion

theres no way to verify it

The following topic “What is the best-tasting fruit in the world?” is not a good topic for research as it is too subjective. The result of the research can be challenged by many people. Therefore, D is the correct option.

Research is a systematic and creative study to increase the knowledge of the individual upon a topic that belongs to a particular subject. It is ultimately a process of creating new learning with the help of existing knowledge. Research involves many steps. These steps are the collection, organization, and analysis of information on a topic in order to increase the understanding and knowledge of the topic.

Research not only helps in improving the knowledge base but also paves the way for future research. The topic of the research should be general and in a wider and broader perspective in order to give a broader knowledge to society.

Thus, the following topic, “What is the best-tasting fruit in the world?” is not a good topic for research as it is too subjective. The result of the research can be challenged by many people. Therefore, D is the correct option.

To know more about research, visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/24174276

#SPJ5

Option 3. Marcus Garvey created a movement encouraging black Americans to migrate to Africa. To do this he created  A shipping company called the Black Star Line.

The reason for this was to facilitate a relationship between the blacks in America with the blacks that are in Africa. This was a way to enhance black nationalism around the world.

Marcus Garvey was a founder of the Universal Black movement in America. He wanted the blacks to be in touch and have harmonious dealings within themselves.

Read more on Marcus Garvey here:

https://brainly.com/question/13512802

#SPJ1

The interchange of living things, including plants and animals, between the Eastern and Western Hemispheres is known as the "Columbian Exchange." The term "Columbian" relates to Christopher Columbus, who made the Western Hemisphere known to those in the Eastern Hemisphere, particularly in Europe.

The so-called "Columbian Exchange" was actually the culmination of several small-scale organism exchanges across the hemispheres rather than a purposeful and calculated action. Examples include the importation of European livestock (sheep, goats, donkeys, horses, and cattle) into the Americas and the importation of American plants (maize, potatoes, tomatoes, avocados, cassava, several species of beans, chilis, several species of squash, etc.) into Europe and other parts of the world. A smaller number of American animals were traded, but some were: llamas, vicunas, turkeys, macaws, chinchillas, and Chihuahua dogs. The latter were only curiosities and never had the same level of economic significance as some of the others.

Disease-causing organisms also play a role in the Columbian Exchange: following the discovery of the Americas, microbes and, in certain cases, the vectors of diseases including syphilis, malaria, yellow fever, Chagas, smallpox, and measles traveled across the hemispheres.

Human populations, predominantly from the Eastern to the Western Hemisphere, are not included in the Columbian Trade. Caucasoids and Negroids became permanent inhabitants of the Western Hemisphere as a result of the exchange. The transferred technological processes are also not taken into consideration.

Notice:  I'll edit my answer if I interpret this incorrectly.

So rephrasing this and excluding certain parts, a new question can be made: What were the reasons for division of Germany?

At the Yalta conference after World War II, Germany was split into four zones of occupation; the occupying countries were the UK, France, the USA, and the USSR. Berlin was located in the USSR-occupied zone; as a result, the other allies insisted that Berlin be divided into four as well.

The elections that will take place the next year were intended to gradually bring Germany back together.

The US and USSR's wartime alliance—or, more generally, the tense partnership between communism and capitalism—started to break down once their shared opponent, Nazi Germany, was destroyed. Both the USSR and the western nations worried that Germany would elect a communist administration, while the USSR believed that Germany would maintain its capitalist system. Neither side trusted the other to conduct free and fair elections. Because neither side wanted to give up control over Germany, occupation continued.

The merging of three of the zones started between 1946 and 1949. First, the British and US zones amalgamated to become Bizonia, a semi-state, then the French joined them in Trizonia.

The USSR-run portion, meanwhile, remained strongly aligned with the USSR. The Cold War started to worsen and it became obvious that the alliance was gone during the Berlin Blockade of 1948–1949, when the Russians cut off what had become West Berlin from the outside world. West Berlin remained under the supervision of the UK, USA, and France, but West Germany as a whole was very different from East Germany.

Perhaps the most significant division occurred when "West Germany" joined NATO, an alliance primarily created to protect against communism, and "East Germany" joined the communist Warsaw Pact. They were now basically two distinct states, each with its own ideology.

Elections were conducted shortly afterward, and the two states formally separated from one another.

Germany was never designed to be divided into the east and west. The USSR and USA were completely distrusted, which led to the gradual and seemingly inevitable split.

Fortunately, the reunification of the two halves of Germany in 1990 was a historic event on both a national and global scale.

Henry IV had to grant the Protestants freedom (option C) to regain control of France after a period of civil war.

Henry of Bourbon (1553-1610) was King of France as Henry IV between 1589 and 1610. He is popular for being considered the best monarch who has governed his country, due to his concern to guarantee a dignified life to all his subjects.

One of his most outstanding ideas was that of peace and prosperity because after the religious civil war that took place in France between Protestants and Catholics, he decided to grant freedom of worship to Protestants to avoid more war conflicts.

Learn more about Henry IV in: https://brainly.com/question/1193750

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer is D) Personally change from Protestantism to Catholicism.

Explanation:

I know this because I took the exam! Hoped I helped! :)

The American Revolution and Civil War expanded American principles and ideals through the US Declaration of Independence and the gains of rights to citizens.

It was a series of struggles fought by American citizens for the end of English colonization, as the colonists were dissatisfied with the great exploration of the colonies and lack of rights, thus instituting the Independence of the United States on July 4, 1776.

Therefore, the American Revolution had as its objectives the freedom of the country from colonization, while the Civil War had as its objectives the emancipation of slaves and the victory of the Union, both being movements in favor of the conquest of rights.

Find out more about American Revolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/18317211

#SPJ1

South Carolina Congressman Preston Brooks beat Senator Charles Sumner with a cane before  John Brown  could be tried for his actions at Harpers Ferry. 

Therefore, option A is correct.

The Trial of John Brown was an important part of Massachusetts history.

One if the highlights of the Trial was the canning of Charles Sumner  by the Congressman from Massachusetts Preston Brooks.

The trial was based on murder of John Brown.

Learn more about the trial of John Brown at https://brainly.com/question/1177013

#SPJ1

Answer: hello! so i my self am a hippie. and too me and my friends (also hippies) it means peace. the flower to us shows peace and happiness. it shows were calm and not always collected but most of the time at peace ! ☮️✌️

Explanation:

Answer: flowers refer to “ flower power” or non-violence and passive resistance

Explanation: hippies are known for their non-violent and peaceful outlook, there’s a certain type of empowerment in being above violence

Answer:

war

Explanation:war

The Pueblo Revolt in Spanish New Mexico (d.) permanently freed the Navajos and Apaches from Spanish authority.

What happened in Pueblo Revolt?

Learn more about Pueblo Revolt

brainly.com/question/14420725

#SPJ4

Shays's Rebellion exposed the weakness of the government under the Articles of Confederation and led many—including George Washington—to call for strengthening the federal government in order to put down future uprisings.

The examples of UN's work includes the following:

The North and South Korean peace deal was negotiated by the UN (United Nations), which also uses peacekeepers to maintain stability in a number of other countries. Along with their goal of helping those in need, they also published the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Since 1948, when the Security Council approved the dispatch of UN military observers to the Middle East to oversee the Armistice Agreement between Israel and its Arab neighbors, the UN has sent military forces on peacekeeping missions.

Therefore, options A, B, D, and E are correct.

To learn more about the UN's work, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/26666287

#SPJ6

With the passage of the disaster relief act of 1974, the federal agency which possessed the most significant authority for natural disaster response and recovery is Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The department of housing and urban development possessed the most significant authority for natural disaster response and recovery. This existed through the National Flood Insurance Program under the Federal insurance administration and the federal disaster assistance administration.

The disaster management operations extended down to local levels . There were various other organization which led to confusion during disaster response efforts. In response to this increased confusion and turfed wars a group of state civil defense directors launched an effort to consolidate Federal emergency management activities into single agency.

Learn more about Disaster from:

https://brainly.com/question/26342911

#SPJ4

The question is incomplete but I have the entire one:

Which practice was more likely to be accepted after the scientific revolution than before?

A. Scientists deriving much of their knowledge from the Bible

B. Scientists claiming that the Earth was at the center of the solar

system

C. Scientists challenging traditional beliefs about the way the

universe works

D. Scientists attending universities controlled by the Catholic Church

Answer:

B). Scientists claiming that the Earth was at the center of the solar system.

What was revolutionary about the Scientific Revolution? How did the study of nature in the 16th century differ from the study of nature in the Middle Ages?

Disclaimer: I can only write with confidence about paradigm shifts between medieval and Renaissance alchemy.

Here's what Robert Boyle wrote in The Sceptical Chymist (1661):

And, to prevent mistakes, I must advertize you, that I now mean by elements, as those chymists that speak plainest do by their principles, certain primitive or simple, or perfectly unmingled bodies; which not being made of any other bodies, or of one another, are the ingredients of which all those called perfectly mixt bodies are immediately compounded, and into which they are ultimately resolved: now whether there be any such body to be constantly met with in all, and each, of those that are said to be elemented bodies, is the thing I now question.

[Note: I realize this is not from the 16th Century, but the 16th Century is just too soon if you want solid answers about the differences you are inquiring about.]

Bear with me here because this might get a bit out of hand.

In The Birth of the Clinic, Michel Foucault explains in great detail what he refers to as the "medical gaze" of the 19th Century. According to Foucault, the "medical gaze" was a state of mind in which physicians at the time were able to "gaze" upon any number of patients and read and interpret the various signs in order to determine the symptoms.

For example, let's say two patients have pneumonia, but one patient coughs violently whereas the other patient simply wheezes. Both possess the symptom of fluid in the lungs, but the signs are completely different.

For Foucault, the "medical gaze" represents a newfound perception of nature anticipating the advent of what we now call structural linguistics. In structural linguistics, language consists of two elements--the sign and the signified, where the sign is the symbol or word on the page and the signified is the meaning. According to Ferdinand de Saussure, the founder of structural linguistics, the sign is completely arbitrary: we agree to call red "red", but we could just as easily agree to call red "farfignuggen" and none would be the wiser.

So the signified is static, but the sign can be dynamic. This is the crux of the "medical gaze": regardless of how many different signs there are (coughing, wheezing, heaving breathing), the physician can still read and interpret those signs in order to determine the symptom (fluid in the lungs). The signs are dynamic, the symptom is static.

Now let's answer your question.

Up until Robert Boyle wrote The Sceptical Chymist, alchemists approached nature the same way physicians approached symptoms in the 19th Century.

During the Middle Ages, every aspect of nature--from wood to metal to the planets themselves--consisted of two opposing elements, Mercury and Sulphur. The problem is that the signs alchemists used to signify those elements changed as if based on the time of day. For one alchemist, Mercury was a woman bearing buckets of water from a well. For another, Mercury was a green lion. For others, Mercury was simply Quicksilver. The element remained the same (for the most part) all the way into the Renaissance, but the signs (woman with water, green lion, quicksilver, etc) changed constantly.

While the signs of symptoms changed based on patients' immune systems, the signs of Mercury changed based on which alchemist was writing about Mercury.

And while Foucault called attention to the "medical gaze" of the 19th Century, one could just as easily call attention to an "alchemist's gaze" of the Middle Ages and the Early Renaissance.

Robert Boyle changed all of that. He came out and he said, "Forget this fickleness! We need one sign and one sign only. And we need to agree! No more calling this element by ten different names. No more correspondence systems. We need to agree and we need to do it now."

Of course, I am paraphrasing in a rather silly way, but that's the gist of what he meant when he wrote the passage I quoted at the beginning. What eventually became a rising trend in medicine was an old trend in alchemy that needed to be quashed for completely different reasons.

So it's not a matter of how the 16th Century differed from the Middle Ages, but how the Late Renaissance called an end to the fickleness of the Natural Philosophy that preceded it.

James Madison, America's fourth president from 1809 to 1817, collaborated with John Jay and Alexander Hamilton on the Federalist Papers, which had a substantial impact on the Constitution's ratification. Later on, he was referred to as the "Father of the Constitution."

To become the fourth president of the United States, James Madison defeated Federalist Charles Cotesworth Pinckney (1745–1825) in the 1808 presidential election. The embargo produced problems for Madison since Britain and France continued to assault American ships.

In his State of the Union address in 1815, Madison promoted supporting Henry Clay's American System, which implemented laws aimed at uniting the East and the West in a single market. Protective tariffs, a national road system, and a national bank were some of these measures.

To know more about James Madison refer to:   https://brainly.com/question/2145341

#SPJ1

Mohandas  Gandhi joined INC after returning to India in 1920 on the request of his mentor Gopal Krishna Gokhle.

He first participated in Kheda Movement (1917-1918) , Champaran (1917) movement. Later on gave leadership to independence movement - Non cooperation (1920), Civil Disobedience (1930), Quit India Movement (1942), Khilafat movement ( 1919).

He believed in non-violent revolt and was influenced by the idea of John Ruskin, Bhagavat Gita, Bible , Emerson Thoreu, Leo tolstoy.

He is called "Father of the nation" in  modern India. Gandhi advocated independence for India using non- violence resistance form which he called Satyagraha. This helped India to gain independence from British.

To know more about What significance did Mohandas Gandhi have on India's independence movement here

https://brainly.com/question/15212821

#SPJ1

Answer:

As tales are repeated and passed on, they are inevitably changed as they are retold regardless of the storytellers' intentions. With no way to differentiate the original tale from an adapted one, no one truly knows how old the tales are or what form is truly authentic. With that said, the version of the tale told is affected by the person telling it the tale. Their young, socioeconomic status, family ties, and life experiences all affect the narrative of the story as each person may find value in different aspects of the same tale; a “conundrum about the universal use of the story to help people come to terms with the fears, the challenges and the mysteries that are all part of life”

Answer:

Joan of Arc was a French peasant girl. She rose to immense providence fighting with the Dauphin of France Charles against the English. Joan of Arc was the one who helped Dauphin defeat the English and reclaim French lands.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

If not, I am sorry.