In South Africa during the era of apartheid, white South Africans were the beneficiaries of institutionalized racism. Similarly, in Nazi Germany, the Aryan race was held up as superior to all others.
The apartheid system in South Africa was designed to maintain white supremacy and protect the interests of the white minority. In Nazi Germany the Jews, Roma people, homosexuals, and other groups were targeted for persecution, discrimination, and ultimately, genocide.
The racism harms not only its direct targets but also society as a whole. It perpetuates inequality and division, undermines social cohesion.
Learn more about racism here:
https://brainly.com/question/2864094
#SPJ1
what happens at night but not in day? The book night chapter two
But as darkness falls, Madame Schächter awakens everyone once more with her screams, and once more she is beaten into silence. When it enters a bar-wire-enclosed area at midnight, the train enters the area slowly.
Everybody can see the chimneys of the massive furnaces through the windows. They quickly learn that the awful but vague odour in the air is the smell of burning human flesh. The Auschwitz arrivals processing facility, Birkenau, is this concentration camp.
In Night, Wiesel expresses worry about how seeing inhumane violence might rob even victims of their moral and human sense. brutality fosters brutality, and the Nazis' treatment of Jews as less than human encourages Jewish behavior that is also subhuman. Madame Schächter, however, disturbs everyone once again when night falls with her screams, and once more she is beaten into quiet.
Learn more about novels here:
https://brainly.com/question/9351006
#SPJ1
the decision to allow the 1854 elections to determing the status of slavery in kansas and nebraska resulted in: A. proslavery and antislavery groups fighting to influence the elections. B. abolitionists encouraging uprisings of enslaved people throughout the territories. C. the supreme court legalizing slavery throughout the united states. D. southern leaders refusing to acknowlegde kansas or nebraska as states.
The decision to allow the 1854 elections to determine the status of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska resulted in proslavery and antislavery groups fighting to influence the elections. Option A
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 essentially repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had prohibited slavery in the territories north of the 36°30' latitude line.
This decision allowed for the possibility of slavery expanding into new territories, and both proslavery and antislavery groups saw the importance of influencing the elections in order to either secure or prevent the expansion of slavery.
The proslavery groups, which were largely composed of southern Democrats, saw the Kansas-Nebraska Act as an opportunity to expand the institution of slavery and strengthen their power in Congress.
They sent thousands of proslavery settlers into Kansas to vote in the elections and ensure that slavery would be allowed in the territory. The antislavery groups, on the other hand, saw the expansion of slavery as a threat to their values and fought to prevent it.
They encouraged northerners to move to Kansas and vote against slavery, leading to clashes and violence between the two groups.
The decision to allow the 1854 elections to determine the status of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska did not result in abolitionists encouraging uprisings of enslaved people throughout the territories. Additionally, it did not result in the Supreme Court legalizing slavery throughout the United States.
However, southern leaders did refuse to acknowledge Kansas or Nebraska as states, as they were perceived as being sympathetic to the abolitionist cause.
Overall, the decision to allow the 1854 elections to determine the status of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska had significant political and social implications.
It further intensified the sectional tensions between the North and South, and set the stage for the eventual outbreak of the Civil War. So Option A is correct.
For more question on antislavery visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29418929
#SPJ11
please help
How did the printing press help spread knowledge and ideas throughout Europe?
A. The printing press led to a new way to make clothing.
B. The printing press led to the creation of other scientific inventions.
C. The printing press translated books into many different languages.
D. The printing press created more copies of books for people to read.
The printing press help spread knowledge and ideas throughout Europe as its created more copies of books for people to read. The Option D.
How did the printing press help spread knowledge?Before the invention of the printing press, books were hand-copied, making them expensive and rare. With printing press, books could be produced much more quickly and at a lower cost which allows for a wider distribution of knowledge and ideas.
This led to an increase in literacy rates and the spread of new ideas across Europe. The printing press played a significant role in the development of the Renaissance and the Reformation because it allowed for the dissemination of scientific discoveries and religious texts to a wider audience.
Read more about printing press
brainly.com/question/22177437
#SPJ1