Answer: The Articles of Confederation were necessary even though the Declaration of Independence was already written because the Declaration was primarily a statement of principles and a justification for independence from British rule. It did not provide a framework for how the newly independent colonies would govern themselves. The Articles of Confederation, on the other hand, established a system of government for the newly formed United States.
The Articles of Confederation were designed to create a weak central government with most powers left to the individual states. However, this arrangement proved to be problematic, as the central government lacked the power to tax or regulate commerce, leading to economic problems and other issues. Ultimately, the weakness of the Articles of Confederation led to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution and the establishment of a stronger, more centralized federal government.
Therefore, the Articles of Confederation were necessary to create a functioning government for the new United States, whereas the Declaration of Independence was a statement of ideals and principles that served as a rallying cry for the revolution but did not provide a framework for governing the newly independent nation.
The Declaration of Independence announced the separation of colonies from Great Britain and stated their grievances. However, it did not provide a structure for the new government. The Articles of Confederation filled this gap, outlining the function and power distribution of the federal government and states.
Explanation:The Declaration of Independence was a formal statement declaring the freedom of the thirteen American colonies from Great Britain. It enumerated the grievances of the colonists against the British King but did not include a plan for the operation of the new independent states.
On the other hand, the Articles of Confederation were the first constitution of the United States, which provided an actual framework for the federal government. The colonists believed it to be necessary as it detailed the distribution of power between the national government and individual states, and designed a mechanism for coordinated action in areas of common interest, such as commerce and defense.
Learn more about Articles of Confederation here:https://brainly.com/question/18377156
#SPJ2
i need a answer on number 17
“What we’re developed as a form segregation (separate the races) in response to reconstruction?”
After the Reconstruction era in the United States, several forms of racial segregation emerged as a response to the social and political changes brought about by the Reconstruction period. One prominent form was Jim Crow segregation, which aimed to enforce racial separation and discrimination.
Jim Crow laws were implemented in the late 19th century and continued well into the 20th century. These laws mandated racial segregation in public facilities such as schools, transportation, restrooms, and even parks. The purpose of these laws was to maintain white supremacy and control over African Americans, limiting their rights and opportunities.
The development of segregation laws was driven by a combination of factors, including deep-rooted racism, the desire to preserve white power and privilege, and the belief in the false concept of racial superiority. These laws were reinforced by societal norms and attitudes that endorsed racial separation and perpetuated discriminatory practices.
The implementation of segregation had profound effects on African American communities, leading to systemic inequalities, limited access to resources and opportunities, and the perpetuation of racial prejudice. It took several decades of civil rights activism and legal challenges before segregation was gradually dismantled, culminating in landmark Supreme Court decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.
Overall, the development of segregation laws as a response to Reconstruction reflected the persistence of racial discrimination and inequality in American society, imposing significant hardships on marginalized communities and delaying progress toward racial justice.
For more questions on Segregation
https://brainly.com/question/14330237
#SPJ11
100 tickets are sold for $2 each. There is $100 prize and a $50 prize. What is the expected value for a person that buys a ticket?
Answer:
To calculate the expected value for a person that buys a ticket, we need to multiply the probability of each outcome by the payoff of that outcome and then add them up. The probability of winning the $100 prize is 1/100, since there is only one winning ticket out of 100. The probability of winning the $50 prize is also 1/100, since there is only one other winning ticket. The probability of losing is 98/100, since there are 98 tickets that do not win anything. The payoff of winning the $100 prize is $98, since we have to subtract the cost of the ticket ($2) from the prize. The payoff of winning the $50 prize is $48, for the same reason. The payoff of losing is -$2, since we lose the cost of the ticket. Therefore, the expected value for a person that buys a ticket is:
(1/100) * ($98) + (1/100) * ($48) + (98/100) * (-$2)
= $0.98 + $0.48 - $1.96
= -$0.50
This means that on average, a person that buys a ticket will lose $0.50 in this game.
MARK AS BRAINLIEST!!!
A man is sentenced to 5 years of prison for walking across his neighbor's lawn. In this example, we can say that the punishment is
In the example given, a five-year prison sentence for strolling across his neighbor's property may be judged excessive to the offence committed. In relation to the act of trespassing on private land, such a punishment looks to be disproportionate.
In general, small offences like trespassing are punished with fines, community work, or other types of relatively light punishment. The severity of the punishment calls into question the legal system's proportionality and fairness in this case.
It highlights a potential imbalance in the justice system, as well as the necessity for careful evaluation of the appropriateness of the punishment, taking into account the principle of proportionality and the goal of ensuring that penalties are proportionate to the gravity of the offence.A reprimand
For more questions on disproportionate.
https://brainly.com/question/16277386
#SPJ11
In what ways does Alexander show the historical oppression of African Americans from slavery to today’s New Jim Crow? Please explain with analysis. 200 words please
Giving our brainliest!!!
Use the excerpt from the speech on the air traffic controllers strike to answer
the question.
Using the excerpt from Reagan's speech about air traffic controllers, answer
(a), (b), and (c).
a. In 1-2 sentences, explain is the primary purpose of this speech.
b. In 2-3 sentences, describe the rationale Reagan provides for his
proposed actions.
c. In 1-2 sentences, identify the ultimate outcome of the situation Reagan
describes in the speech.
The primary purpose of the excerpt from Reagan's speech is to address the air traffic controllers' strike and to inform the American people of the government's response to it.
Reagan provides the rationale for his proposed actions by emphasizing the importance of air transportation and the need to ensure its basic stability.
He argues that the striking controllers have violated the law and that their actions pose a threat to public safety, which justifies the government's firm response.
The ultimate outcome of the situation Reagan describes in the speech is that the striking air traffic controllers are given a 48-hour ultimatum to return to work or be terminated.
Learn more about Reagan here:
https://brainly.com/question/30107881
#SPJ1
Why did the communes in New Mexico disappear after just a few years?
O A. Members moved on.
B. Hippies became farmers.
OC. State leaders kicked them out.
OD. Actors bought the communes.
The disappearance of the communes in New Mexico after just a few years can be attributed to ''Members moved on would be the most accurate choice''. So, the correct choice is option A.
During the countercultural movement of the 1960s and 1970s, many young people sought alternative lifestyles and communal living arrangements. Several communes were established in New Mexico during this time, with individuals coming together to create self-sustaining communities based on shared ideals, such as environmentalism, spirituality, or social equality.
However, the challenges of communal living, including economic difficulties, interpersonal conflicts, and the demanding nature of sustaining a self-sufficient lifestyle, often led members to reevaluate their commitment to the communes. Many individuals found it difficult to reconcile their idealistic visions with the realities of day-to-day living in a commune.
Additionally, as the countercultural movement waned and societal values shifted, some members felt the need to move on and pursue different paths in life. They sought stability, and career opportunities, or started families, which led to the gradual dispersal and dissolution of the communes.
While other options presented are not accurate explanations for the disappearance of the communes, it was primarily the voluntary decision of members to move on and pursue different life trajectories that resulted in the decline and eventual disappearance of the communes in New Mexico.
For more questions on disappearance
https://brainly.com/question/14529701
#SPJ8
Question 5 of 10
Which of the following is not a potential benefit of using more nuclear
energy?
A. Very little air pollution
B. The plants are very expensive to build
C. Fuel is easy to move, so there is less pollution from shipping
D. Cost of fuel is very low
Answer:
Which of the following is not a potential benefit of using more nuclear
energy?
A. Very little air pollution
B. The plants are very expensive to build
C. Fuel is easy to move, so there is less pollution from shipping
D. Cost of fuel is very low
Explanation:
Although nuclear energy has some potential benefits, such as very little air pollution and low cost of fuel, the construction of nuclear power plants can be very expensive. This cost is often passed on to consumers, making nuclear energy more expensive than some other forms of energy.
Answer: the plants are very expensive to build
Explanation:
Use the letter from Jackie Robinson to answer the question.
In the letter, Robinson is justifying the use of strategies that
OA. include violent action in the support of civil rights.
B. promote the gradual implementation of civil rights.
OC. provoke expedient action in the support of civil rights.
OD. can further encourage patience in achieving civil rights.
In order to advance civil rights, Robinson is defending the use of tactics that involve violent action. Therefore, option (A) is correct.
The word "civil rights" is a translation of the Latin jus civis, which means "right of the citizen." Even though Roman citizens had legal rights, they could either be free (libertas) or obedient (servitus).
Following the Edict of Milan in 313, these rights also included the right to freedom of religion; however, the Edict of Thessalonica in 380 mandated that all Roman Empire subjects profess Catholic Christianity.
While the Middle Ages saw the action disappearance of Roman legal doctrine, Christian doctrine continued to be the basis for claims of universal rights.
Learn more about the civil rights, from
brainly.com/question/21057720
#SPJ1
Which rationale best explains Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941?
A. to prevent the United States from entering World War II on the side of the Allies
B. to solidify its dominant position throughout the Pacific by crippling the U.S. Navy
C. to obtain a naval base that would allow it to begin colonizing territories in the Americas
D. to reduce its competition for markets in Asia by disrupting U.S. trade routes across the Pacific
Answer: B
Explanation:
This is how the Japanese were going to keep taking over the Pacific.
Which colonies in British North America had a large number of plantations?
Any investment expenditure by a government is part of this expenditures approach for calculating the GDP.
Responses
gross imports
gross imports
sum of all the country's businesses spending on capital
sum of all the country's businesses spending on capital
gross exports
gross exports
consumer spending
consumer spending
sum of government spending
sum of government spending
When calculating GDP using the expenditures approach, any investment expenditure by the government is included in the "sum of government spending" component of the formula. This component is then combined with consumer spending, investment, and net exports to arrive at the total GDP figure.
The expenditures approach for calculating GDP involves adding up four components: consumer spending (C), investment (I), government spending (G), and net exports (NX), which is the difference between gross exports and gross imports. The formula for GDP using this approach is:GDP = C + I + G + NX
Any investment expenditure by a government is part of the "G" component, or the sum of government spending, in this formula. This component includes spending by the government on various goods and services, including infrastructure projects, public services, and defense. It is important to note that transfer payments, such as social security and unemployment benefits, are not included in government spending for GDP calculation.
For more questions on GDP
https://brainly.com/question/27404046
#SPJ11
The historical election of President Obama and the rise of the Tea Party are clear examples of the polarization faced by Americans today. Using details and examples from Chapter 30, identify and explain the historical election of President Obama as well as the emergence of the Tea Party.
A member of the Senate makes a statement to the press that she is unsure of how she is going to vote on a bill. After numerous calls from her constituents asking her to vote for the bill, she votes in support of the bill.
A member of the Senate makes a statement to the press that she is unsure of how she is going to vote on a bill. This is an example of republicanism.
Republicanism contends that a country is run as a republic, or that a country ought to be run as a republic where the head of state is chosen through non-hereditary means and protects the interests of both the country and the people who were elected to hold political office. In a word, representatives in a republic must serve the needs of the people they represent.
In the given question, a senator tells the media that she isn't sure how she would vote on a certain issue. Because the senator changed his mind about the bill he would reject because his voters expressed interest in that bill, this is an illustration of republicanism.
Read more about republicanism on:
https://brainly.com/question/29000065
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
A member of the Senate makes a statement to the press that she is unsure of how she is going to vote on a bill. After numerous calls from her constituents asking her to vote for the bill, she votes in support of the bill. What is this an example of?
hi i need a answer on number 13
“What Act was the first of its kind because it was the first time Congress passed an act protecting African American?”
Answer:
Americanan Americans own a house
What empire was very populas
Answer:
The Mughal Empire is one of the most populous empires ever.
Explanation:
Write 5 paragraphs about ww1 like how it started and ended 100 points plus brainy
(well I'm taking History class ab it and now we're on the holocaust/what started ww2 so...)
ww1 basically started because of the assassination of Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand. A man named Gavrilo Princip, who was part of a Serbian Nationalist group, took out a gun and killed both Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife. This was basically the beginning of ww1.
Austria/Hungary were upset by this and declared war on Serbia. Later, Germany joined Austria/Hungary. Soon, Russia entered the war on Serbia's side. So, technically, Austria blamed Serbia, which then looked to Russia for support. Germany declared war on Russia in support of Austria and on France because of its alliance with Russia. Britain declared war on Germany in support of Belgium and France, and on Turkey because of her alliance with Germany. Great Britain declared war on Germany because of Germany's invasion of the neutral country of Belgium. The British declared war on August 4, 1914. This began the whole war of the European countries.
In other ways, Militarism, Imperialism, Nationalism, and Alliances also started ww1.
Militarism = As the world entered the 20th century, a race for military power grew. By 1914, Germany had the biggest increase in their military. Great Britain and France also increased their military power too. Further, in Germany and Russia particularly, the military establishment began to have a greater influence on public policy. This increase in militarism helped push the countries involved into war.
Imperialism = Imperialism is when a country increases its power and wealth by bringing additional territories under its control. Before World War I, Africa and parts of Asia were points of contention among the European countries. This was especially true because of the raw materials these areas could provide. The increasing competition and desire for greater empires led to an increase in confrontation that helped push the world into ww1.
Nationalism = Much of the origin of the war was based on the desire of the Slavic peoples in Bosnia and Herzegovina to no longer be part of Austria-Hungary but instead be part of Serbia. In this way, nationalism led directly to the War. But in a more general way, the nationalism of the various countries throughout Europe contributed not only to the beginning but the extension of the war in Europe. Each country tried to prove its dominance and power.
Alliances = Over time, countries throughout Europe made mutual
defense agreements that would pull them into battle.
These treaties meant that if one country was attacked,
allied countries were bound to defend them. Before
World War 1, the following alliances existed:
- Russia and Serbia.
- Germany and Austria-Hungary.
- France and Russia.
- Britain and France and Belgium.
- Japan and Britain.
Armistice on the Western Front. On Nov. 11, 1918, after more than four years of horrific fighting and the loss of millions of lives, the guns on the Western Front fell silent. Although fighting continued elsewhere, the armistice between Germany and the Allies was the first step to ending World War I.
which statement would a frederalist be most likely to agree with
A federalist would most likely agree with statement A: "The federal government can only function effectively if it has the ability to collect taxes". Therefore, the correct option is (A).
A federalist would most likely agree with statement A: "The federal government can only function effectively if it has the ability to collect taxes".Federalists believed in a strong central government with the necessary powers to carry out its functions and maintain stability. They advocated for a system where the federal government had the authority to collect taxes to fund its operations, maintain a standing army, and promote economic development. Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton, believed that a strong central government was essential for national unity, defense, and economic progress. They supported the idea of a balanced government with a separation of powers, but they emphasized the need for a capable federal government that could address national issues effectively. Therefore, statement A aligns with the principles and beliefs of federalists.For more such questions on Federalist:
https://brainly.com/question/28040826
#SPJ8
Question:
Which statement would a federalists be most likely to agree with?
A. The federal government can only function effectively if it has the ability to collect taxes.
B. It is dangerous for a national government to have too much power.
C. The federal government must act quickly to find new international trading partners.
D. The United states should not have a single, powerful chief executive.
Read Chapter 2, from the beginning to “Ferdinand Magellan: In Columbus’s Wake and Beyond,” on pages 210-215. Answer this question
1.Write what you learned next to each topic in the Word Bank below:
A: Vasco da Gama:
B: Pope Alexander VI:
C: 1498:
D. West Brazil:
E: King Manuel:
F: Line of Demarcation:
G: 1500:
H: East Indies:
I: Vitamin C:
J: Treaty of Tordesillas
K: King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella
L: Pedro Cabrá:
Vasco da Gama was a Portuguese explorer who established a direct sea route from Europe to India in 1497-1499, opening up the East Indies for trade and solidifying Portugal's dominance in the Indian Ocean. Pope Alexander VI, during his papacy from 1492 to 1503, issued the papal bull Inter caetera in 1493, dividing the newly discovered territories between Spain and Portugal, setting the stage for their exploration and colonization efforts. In 1498, Vasco da Gama successfully reached India, marking a significant milestone in the Age of Exploration. These figures and events played vital roles in the Age of Exploration, shaping the course of European expansion and establishing dominance in trade and colonization.
A: Vasco da Gama: Vasco da Gama was a Portuguese explorer who is known for being the first European to sail directly from Europe to India. His successful voyage in 1497-1499 opened up a sea route to the East Indies and established Portugal's dominance in the Indian Ocean trade.
B: Pope Alexander VI: Pope Alexander VI, born Rodrigo Borgia, was the pope from 1492 to 1503. He issued the papal bull Inter caetera in 1493, which divided the newly discovered territories outside Europe between Spain and Portugal, setting the stage for their colonization and exploration.
C: 1498: This refers to the year 1498, which was significant in the Age of Exploration. It was the year when Vasco da Gama reached India, establishing a direct sea route from Europe to the East.
F: Line of Demarcation: The Line of Demarcation was an imaginary line established by the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494. It divided the newly discovered lands outside Europe between Spain and Portugal along a meridian, with territories to the east falling under Portugal's control and those to the west under Spain's control.
J: Treaty of Tordesillas: The Treaty of Tordesillas was signed in 1494 between Spain and Portugal, mediated by the Pope. It aimed to resolve conflicts over newly discovered lands by establishing the Line of Demarcation and dividing the world between the two countries.
K: King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella: King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella were the rulers of the united kingdoms of Castile and Aragon in Spain. They sponsored Christopher Columbus's voyages, which led to the European exploration and colonization of the Americas.
L: Pedro Cabral: Pedro Álvares Cabral was a Portuguese navigator and explorer. In 1500, he led an expedition to India but ended up discovering Brazil, claiming it for Portugal.
for more questions on Age of Exploration
https://brainly.com/question/17008975
#SPJ11
Which best describes an opportunity cost?
Answer:
Opportunity cost is the value of what you lose when you choose from two or more alternatives. It’s a core concept for both investing and life in general. When you invest, opportunity cost can be defined as the amount of money you might not earn by purchasing one asset instead of another.
Which describes as a result of the military action shown in the map above
Option A, Mussolini being forced to resign, was the outcome of the military action depicted on the map.
Mussolini was overthrown and imprisoned on King Victor Emmanuel III's orders on July 25, 1943, after the invasion of Sicily caused the fascist Italian government to fall. On September 8, the newly elected government ratified an armistice with the Allies.
The Allies invaded Italy in an effort to gain access to continental Europe. They reasoned that this would be simpler than crossing the English Channel to reach the heavily fortified beaches of Nazi Germany. Because they believed Italy would fall, the Allies continued to apply pressure after driving German and Italian divisions from Africa.
To learn more about Mussolini: https://brainly.com/question/988351
#SPJ1
Note that the full question is:
The map below shows the invasion of italy in 1943: which describes a result of the military action shown in the map?
A. Mussolini was forced to resign.
B. Allied forces cut the germany army in half.
C. The German army immediately surrendered.
D. Stalin felt betrayed by Roosevelt and Churchill
(check the attached image for the map)
what was not true about the economy at the end of the world war ll
At the end of World War II, it is not true that the global economy was in a state of collapse or severe recession. Instead, the post-war period witnessed a significant economic recovery and growth, marked by the reconstruction of war-torn nations, increased industrial production, and the establishment of international economic institutions like the Bretton Woods system.
The Bretton Woods system was a global financial framework established in 1944 during a conference held in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, USA. It aimed to promote economic stability and international trade after World War II.
Under this system, participating countries fixed their exchange rates to the U.S. dollar, which was pegged to gold. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank were also created to provide financial assistance and facilitate economic cooperation among member nations.
The Bretton Woods system played a significant role in shaping the post-war global economy until its collapse in the early 1970s.
Learn more about Bretton Woods system here:
https://brainly.com/question/32321131
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements is true regarding the difference between credit cards and debit cards?
Responses
Consumers can use debit and credit cards the same way; however, payment to the business takes a few days if a credit card is used.
Consumers cannot use credit cards to pay for goods and services the same way they can use debit cards.
Debit cards incur interest charges with each purchase, and credit cards do not.
A credit card is actually currency loaned to a consumer to pay for things, and it must be paid back; debit cards deduct money directly from a bank account.
The true statement regarding the difference between credit cards and debit cards is Consumers can use debit and credit cards the same way; however, payment to the business takes a few days if a credit card is used.
The statement means that consumers can use both debit cards and credit cards to make purchases in a similar manner. They can be used for online or in-person transactions at businesses that accept card payments. However, there is a difference in how the payment is processed.
When a debit card is used for a transaction, the funds are immediately deducted from the consumer's bank account. The payment is processed electronically, and the funds are transferred to the business within a few days, typically clearing the payment quickly.
On the other hand, when a credit card is used, the payment is not directly deducted from the consumer's bank account. Instead, the credit card company covers the cost of the purchase, and the consumer becomes liable to repay the credit card company for the amount spent. The credit card company will then bill the consumer for the charges made on the card, usually on a monthly basis.
While the consumer can use both debit and credit cards to make purchases, the timing of payment to the business differs. With a debit card, the payment to the business is immediate, as the funds are deducted from the consumer's account. With a credit card, the payment to the business takes a few days as it goes through the credit card company's processing and billing cycle before the consumer is required to repay the amount spent.
For more questions on debit cards
https://brainly.com/question/31072576
#SPJ11
Giuseppe Mazzini (18051872), the founder (1831) of Young Italy, was perhaps the leading figure in liberal nationalism. He saw the creation of a democratic Italian state as crucial to Italy's development. Europe no longer possesses unity of faith, of mission, or of aim. Such unity is a necessity in the world. Here, then, is the secret of the crisis. It is the duty of every one to examine and analyse calmly and carefully the probable elements of this new unity. But those who persist in perpetuating, by violence or by Jesuitical compromise, the extern observance of the old unity, only perpetuate the crisis, and render its issue more violent. There are in Europe two great questions; or, rather, the question of the transformation of authority, that is to say, of the Revolution, has assumed two forms; the question wh all have agreed to call social, and the question of nationalities. The first is more exclusively agitated in France, the second in the heart of the other peoples of Europe. I say, which all have agreed to call social, because, generally speaking, every great revolution is so far social, that it cannot be accomplished either in the religious, political, or any other sphere, without affecting social relations, the sources and the distribution of wealth, but that which is only a secondary consequence in political revolutions is now the cause and the banner of the movement in France. The question there is now, above all, to establish better relations between labour and capital, between production and consumption, between the workman and the employer. It is probable that the European initiative, that which will give a new impulse to intelligence and to events, will spring from the question of nationalities. The social question may, in effect, although with difficulty, be partly resolved by a single people; it is an internal question for each, and the French Republicans of 1848 so understood it, when, determinately abandoning the European initiative, they placed Lamartine's [Note: A French poet and politician] manifesto by the side of their aspirations towards the organisation of labour. The question of nationalit can only be resolved by destroying the treaties of 1815, and changing the map of Europe and its public Law. The question of Nationalities, rightly understood, is the Alliance the Peoples; the balance of powers based upon new foundations: the organisation of the work that Europe has to accomplish. 1. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? W was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages a well? 2. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use? 3. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How? 4. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, c for the public? How does that affect the source? 3
The main points of the author's message or argument are the significance of European unification and the necessity of establishing a democratic Italy.
Giuseppe Mazzini highlights the problem brought on by the division and urges a cool-headed analysis of the components of a fresh unity of Italy. He condemns the maintenance of previous forms of unification through coercion or compromise and emphasizes the two key issues of the transition of authority: the social question and the nationality issue.
The message makes it clear that it supports the improvement of relations between labor and capital, the redrawing of Europe's political borders to address the issue of nationalities, and the interpretation of nations as coalitions of peoples.
Learn more about Italy, from:
brainly.com/question/12114445
#SPJ1
give an account of paleys analogical argument and accounts of three of Hume's four obejectives to the teleological argument. Give a brief account of the fine-tuning teleological argument. How do current scientific theories (e.g. exolution and multiverse) challenge the teleological argument?
Paley's analogical argument proposes a designer for the natural world. Hume objects to evil, limited analogy, and single-designer assumptions. The fine-tuning argument claims a designer, but evolution and multiverse challenge design.
According to Paley's analogy, the intricacy and orderliness of the natural world imply that a designer must have been involved, just as a watch suggests a watchmaker. Hume challenges the teleological argument, citing the issue of evil, the limitations of comparison, and the presumption of a sole designer.
The cosmos is said to be perfectly tuned to accommodate life, according to the fine-tuning teleological argument, which implies a creator. The teleological argument is opposed by scientific hypotheses that provide naturalistic explanations for the origins of the world and life, such as evolution and the multiverse. These views contend that a design's outward appearance could be deceptive.
Learn more about analogy:
https://brainly.com/question/30247951
#SPJ4
What did the Germans have that most other immigrants did not
Answer: they were Catholics
Explanation:
How has the Cold War impacted foreign and domestic policy?
Another way to phrase this question is: How did the Cold War impact Americans at home and America's role in the world?
Answer the question in a two-paragraph response. For each paragraph, include at least two pieces of evidence to support your claim. Be sure to provide analysis for each piece of evidence.
Requirements:
Minimum of 2 paragraphs
Minimum of four pieces of evidence (2 per paragraph)
Analysis after each piece of evidence
At least 300 words
Answer:
Explanation:
Paragraph 1:
The Cold War had a significant impact on both foreign and domestic policy, shaping America's role in the world and affecting the lives of Americans at home. One way the Cold War influenced foreign policy was through the policy of containment. The United States adopted a strategy to prevent the spread of communism, as seen in the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan. For example, the Truman Doctrine provided economic and military aid to countries threatened by communism, such as Greece and Turkey. This was a response to the perceived Soviet threat and aimed to establish American influence and maintain a balance of power. The analysis here is that the policy of containment was driven by the fear of Soviet expansionism and led to increased American involvement in global affairs.
Another aspect of foreign policy influenced by the Cold War was the arms race and nuclear weapons development. The competition between the United States and the Soviet Union led to the development of an extensive nuclear arsenal on both sides. This arms race escalated tensions and created the concept of mutually assured destruction. An example of this is the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 when the United States and the Soviet Union came dangerously close to nuclear war. The analysis here is that the Cold War intensified the arms race and raised the stakes of conflict, emphasizing the importance of nuclear weapons in shaping international relations.
Paragraph 2:
At home, the Cold War had a profound impact on American society and domestic policy. One notable effect was the rise of McCarthyism and the Red Scare. Fear of communist infiltration and espionage led to widespread paranoia and the persecution of individuals suspected of being sympathetic to communism. The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) conducted investigations and hearings targeting alleged communists in various sectors, including the entertainment industry. The analysis here is that the Red Scare reflected the heightened anxiety and perceived threat from communism, resulting in a climate of suspicion and stifling freedom of expression.
Furthermore, the Cold War had economic implications domestically, as defense spending increased significantly. The military-industrial complex became a major component of the American economy, with the government pouring resources into defense-related industries. This led to the growth of defense contractors, scientific research, and technological advancements. An example is the establishment of NASA in response to the Soviet launch of Sputnik, which triggered a space race between the two superpowers. The analysis here is that the Cold War stimulated economic growth and innovation in certain sectors, while diverting resources away from other areas such as social welfare programs.
In conclusion, the Cold War had a profound impact on both foreign and domestic policy. The policy of containment, the arms race, McCarthyism, and the growth of the military-industrial complex were all outcomes of the Cold War. These developments shaped America's role in the world and influenced the lives of Americans at home. The evidence provided demonstrates the multifaceted effects of the Cold War, from geopolitical strategies to societal changes, highlighting its lasting impact on American history.
9. Lunch counter sit-ins and the actions of freedom riders during the Civil Rights
movement are examples of?
The lunch counter sit-ins and the actions of freedom riders during the Civil Rights movement are examples of nonviolent direct action protests.
These protests were a key strategy employed by civil rights activists in the 1950s and 1960s to challenge segregation and discrimination in public spaces and institutions.
Nonviolent direct action protests involved intentionally breaking unjust laws or social norms through acts such as sit-ins, boycotts, and peaceful demonstrations.
By doing so, activists aimed to draw attention to the injustice of segregation and generate public support for their cause, while also demonstrating their commitment to nonviolence in the face of violence and repression.
The lunch counter sit-ins and freedom rides were powerful examples of nonviolent direct action that helped to galvanize support for the Civil Rights movement and bring about significant changes in laws and policies related to segregation and discrimination.
For more questions on nonviolent protests, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16412031
#SPJ11
Use the excerpt from a letter from Malcolm X to answer the question.
This excerpt reflects which of the following strategies used in the civil rights
movement?
O A. non-violence
OB. physical force
O C. appeals to authority violence
OD. use of federal institutions
Answer:
add the excerpt to get an answer
D
Question 2
What war caused the British government to incur a large amount of debt and try to raise
taxes on its colonies?
O American Revolution
O French and Indian War
O World War I
O French Revolution
O
C
C
0
DO
2 pts
(4)
The war that caused the British government to incur a large amount of debt and try to raise taxes on its colonies is: B. French and Indian War.
What was the French and British War?British and French forces clashed over control of North America during the French and Indian War in the year 1754 to 1763 .
The country's debt increased significantly as a result of the British victory in the war and the British government made an effort to reduce the debt by boosting taxes on its colonies. As a result of the enormous objections this policy sparked in the American colonies the American Revolution eventually broke out.
Therefore the correct option is B.
Learn more about British war here:https://brainly.com/question/864581
#SPJ1
What was the first step in the process of Washington becoming a state?
A. Writing a state constitution to protect the rights of its citizens
B. Petitioning the U.S. federal government to be admitted as a new state
C. Getting rid of discriminatory practices such as segregation and the reservation system
D. Resolving the U.S. federal government's disagreements over admitting new states
Answer: The correct answer is:
A. Writing a state constitution to protect the rights of its citizens
The first step in the process of Washington becoming a state was the writing of a state constitution. In 1889, a constitutional convention was held in Olympia, Washington, where a constitution was drafted for the new state. This constitution included provisions to protect the rights of citizens, such as the right to vote, freedom of speech, and the right to bear arms.
After the state constitution was written, it was submitted to the U.S. Congress for approval. Once Congress approved the constitution, Washington was admitted to the Union as the 42nd state on November 11, 1889.