Answer:Of the Indo-European tribes of European origin, the Greeks were foremost as regards both the period at which they developed an advanced culture and their importance in further evolution. The Greeks emerged in the course of the 2nd millennium BCE through the superimposition of a branch of the Indo-Europeans on the population of the Mediterranean region during the great migrations of nations that started in the region of the lower Danube.
Explanation:From 1800 BCE onward the first early Greeks reached their later areas of settlement between the Ionian and the Aegean seas. The fusion of these earliest Greek-speaking people with their predecessors produced the civilization known as Mycenaean. They penetrated to the sea into the Aegean region and via Crete (approximately 1400 BCE) reached Rhodes and even Cyprus and the shores of Anatolia. From 1200 BCE onward the Dorians followed
Answer:
Athens, unlike Sparta, was more concentrated in culture and education, rather than war. They had the best mathematicians, philosophers, physicists, among others.
When was the gold rush.
Answer: January 24, 1848
Explanation:
Answer:
january 24, 1848
Explanation:
This is the correct answer
how did the Three Estates act as a cause of the French Revolution
Answer:
The Third Estate would become a very important early part of the French Revolution. ... But the dramatic inequality in voting—the Third Estate represented more people, but only had the same voting power as the clergy or the nobility—led to the Third Estate demanding more voting power, and as things developed, more rights.Jul 23, 2019
Explanation:
I copied from a textbook
what was the first tree displayed at the white house
what is meant by " Reagan Doctrine"?
Answer:
In his State of the Union address, President Ronald Reagan defines some of the key concepts of his foreign policy, establishing what comes to be known as The Reagan Doctrine.
Hope this helps!
the american hostages were held in the u.s. embassy in teheran by their iranian captors
Answer:
True
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP THANK YOU SO MUCH!!
Shorten this and put it in your own words
Around the year 133 BC, Rome was set up as a democracy. Later the Roman people were sovereign. Even the system of voting was weighted to give more influence to the votes of the wealthy. By 14 AD, when the first emperor Augustus died, popular elections had all but disappeared. This was nothing short of a revolution, brought about through a century of constant civil strife, and sometimes open warfare. Many Romans themselves put the key turning point in 133 BC. The course of events is clear enough.In the process, he deposed from office another tribune who opposed the distribution and argued that his reforms should be funded from the money that came from the new Roman imperial province of Asia. Gracchus's land bill was passed. Gracchus's motivation is much less clear. Whatever his motives were, his career crystallised many of the main issues that were to underlie the revolutionary politics of the next hundred years.The consequences of Rome's growing empire were crucial. Tiberius's decision to use the revenues of Asia for his land distribution was a provocative claim - that the poor as well as the rich should enjoy the fruits of Rome's conquests. But Tiberius's desire to stand for a second tribunate also raised questions of personal political dominance. This became an increasingly urgent issue as leading men in the first century BC, such as Julius Caesar, were sometimes given vast power to deal with the military threats facing Rome from overseas - and then proved unwilling to lay down that power when they returned to civilian life. The events of 133 BC were followed by a series of intensifying crises. At the end of the century Gaius Marius, a stunningly successful soldier, defeated enemies in Africa, Gaul and finally in Italy, when Rome's allies in Italy rebelled against her.He held the highest office of state, the consulship, no fewer than seven times, an unprecedented level of long-term dominance of the political process. Marius then came into violent conflict with Lucius Cornelius Sulla, another Roman warlord, who after victories in the east actually marched on Rome in 82 BC and established himself 'dictator'.This had been an ancient Roman office designed to give a leading politician short terms powers in an emergency.Unlike Julius Caesar, however, who was to become dictator 40 years later, Sulla retired from the office and died in his bed.The middle years of the first century BC were marked by violence in the city, and fighting between gangs supporting rival politicians and political programmes.The two protagonists were Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus ('Pompey the Great', as he was called, after Alexander the Great) and Julius Caesar.Caesar promoted radical policies in the spirit of Tiberius Gracchus; Pompey had the support of the traditionalists.Historians in both the ancient and modern world have devoted enormous energy to tracking the precise stages by which these two men came head-to-head in civil war. But the fact is that, given the power each had accrued and their entrenched opposition, war between them was almost inevitable. Not much 'liberty' was to follow. Instead there was another decade of civil war as Caesar's supporters first of all battled it out with his assassins, and when they had been finished off, fought among themselves.
We need summary
By 133BC Rome has become a democracy but that was handled by wealthy peopleOn 14 AD,king Augustus diedThen Graccus the motivator became less popularRoman ruler dictated him on 82AD.Unlike Julius Caesar a king pompous had the support of traditionalists.But the liberty was not given much.Civil war ended up everythinga
25. People out of work and looking for a job
Answer:
what???
Explanation:
what are you asking?
Which statements about the relative location of Texas are accurate? Check all that apply.Texas is south of Oklahoma.Texas is west of New Mexico.Texas is bordered by Mexico to the south.Texas is on the Pacific coast.Texas is along the Gulf of Mexico.Texas is west of Louisiana.Texas is north of Arkansas.
Answer:Which statements about the relative location of Texas are accurate? Check all that apply.Texas is south of Oklahoma.Texas is west of New Mexico.Texas is bordered by Mexico to the south.Texas is on the Pacific coast.Texas is along the Gulf of Mexico.Texas is west of Louisiana.Texas is north of Arkansas.????
Explanation:
I hate ap world sm okurrrr
Answer:
Explanation:
Don't say that what help you want you can ask I will answer for it
Which similarity existed between the religious practices of the Maya and Aztec in MesoAmerica?
Answer:
This situation is not something extraordinary or unusual within the religious imaginary of the ancient Mesoamericans, as it was common to find representations of deities who took one or more roles and were embodied in different characters depending on different needs and different facets of life, establishing them as omnipotent and perhaps omnipresent gods.
Explanation:
Who led the third Crusade?
Richard the Lionhearted
Stephen of France
Pop Urban II
Peter the Hermit
Answer:
King Philip II of France
Answer:
Richard the Lionhearted
Explanation:
How did the location of Islamic lands make cultural diffusion possible
Answer:
they told me to answer this
On April 4, 1968, Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated: A. while in Dallas supporting a garbage workers' strike. B. as he launched the Poor People's Campaign. C. and while the nation mourned his death, there was no violence. D. and Congressional support for the Open Housing Act declined. E. and no one was ever charged with the crime.
When he was assassinated, the nation mourned his death and there was no violence.
Martin Luther King was an activist who popularly known for being a leader in the American civil rights movement .
Martin Luther King was fatally shot on April 4, 1968 at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis Tennessee.
Martin Luther King went to Memphis to support a strike of African American sanitation workers in 1968 where he was assassinated.
Therefore, the Option C is correct because when he was assassinated, the nation mourned his death and there was no violence.
Read more about this here
brainly.com/question/1996351
2.) What native chief opposed American expansion and aimed to stop it?
a.) Blue Jacket
b.) Tecumseh
c.) The Prophet
d.) Chief Joseph
Answer:
Chief Tecumseh urges Native Americans to unite against white settlers. Alarmed by the growing encroachment of whites settlers occupying Native American lands, the Shawnee Chief Tecumseh calls on all Native peoples to unite and resist.
Brainliest for the best awnser!
You examined the factors that contributed to the decline of the medieval period. In a two-paragraph response answer the following questions using evidence from the unit. Make sure to follow the C.E.R. writing format.
What does it mean that the Middle Ages “declined”? Provide a few examples of this happening from the unit.
How did events and conditions in the Middle Ages set the stage for the Renaissance and the modern era?
the decline of the churches power caused the improvement of life which lead to the creation of trade and currency to help back trades. With the power gap people began to fill roles that helped build the current nations of today and with the church gone and being able to freely innovate this lead to the industrialization period.
Bakit mahalagang matutuhan ang pagtukoy at pagpapaliwanag sa mahahalagang detalye, mensahe at kaisipan ng isang akdang pampanitikan?
Answer:
Upang mapag aralan ang kasaysayan
Explanation:
Compare the 1830 and 1850 census information. What changes do you see?
PLS HELP!!!
Answer:
EVERYONE GOT COUNTED
Explanation:
not just the head of the house hold
What is meant by the "GOLD STANDARD"?
Write TWO paragraphs describing John Marshall and the Supreme Court made the United States Constitution and the National Government the supreme law of the land.
Answer:
John Marshall was the fourth chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (1801-35). In Marbury v. Madison (1803) and other landmark cases, Marshall asserted the Supreme Court’s authority to determine the constitutionality of the nation’s laws—a principle known as judicial review—and shaped the judicial branch into a powerful force in the U.S. government.
why was there a rise of dictators in europe and asia during the 1930s?
Answer:Dictators promised economic recovery and order. ... People believed that the United States should model self-sufficiency for Europe and Asia. People felt World War I had been fought for nothing and wanted to avoid a second conflict.
Explanation:
when two sides of an international conflict possess such enormous arsenals of nuclear missiles that each has the ability to destroy the other in the event of war, it is called
In the military, there are certain terms/terminologies used.
So, when two sides of an international conflict possess such enormous arsenals of nuclear missiles that each has the ability to destroy the other in the event of war, it is called:
mutually assured destruction.
Mutually Assured Destruction is abbreviated as "MAD".
What is Mutually Assured Destruction?Mutually Assured Destruction is known to be a national security policy or a military strategy in which opposing sides possess nuclear weapons that are capable of completely annihilating the attacker and the defender.
Here are some other things to know about Mutually Assured Destruction:
It was coined by Donald Brennan.It's basis is on the theory of deterrence.Under Mutually Assured Destruction, each side possess enough weapons to wipe out the other.Learn more about Mutually Assured Destruction on https://brainly.com/question/2088581
answer the questions in the picture please 100 points if you do
Great Britain began colonizing Australia late in which century?
A.
16th
B.
17th
C.
18th
D.
19th
Answer:
c) 18th century
Explanation:
quem eram os vassalos
Answer:
plss translate that to an English
Explanation:
to answer
4. How was the Espionage Act
amended in 1918 (Sedition
Act)? Discuss the changes.
Answer:
The law was extended on May 16, 1918, by the Sedition Act of 1918, actually a set of amendments to the Espionage Act, which prohibited many forms of speech, including "any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States ... or the flag of the United States, or the uniform of the Army or Navy".
Pls help Between meetings, members of Congress________
i need to know the answers
Is James Horn’s assertion that “Jamestown also presents two sides of America’s founding. On the one hand, England’s New World offered many settlers opportunities for social and economic advancement unthinkable at home; while on the other, colonization unleashed powerful destructive forces that were catastrophic for Indian peoples, whose lands were taken by colonists, and for enslaved Africans and their posterity, whose labor enabled Jamestown, and indeed America, to flourish” true? Why or why not?
Yes James Horn's assertion about the two sides of America's founding is very true.
Firstly the United States was built on the promise that it was the land for the free, and also the land for opportunities. When these people migrated they moved to a new place that gave them hope and more opportunities than where they came from.
Secondly, his assertion is also true. This is due to the fact that the new nation took a lot from the people that owned the place.
They took the ancestral lands of the Indians and also drove them far away. This was after several wars and killings of these people.
Also the country was built on the sweat of the slaves who labored and served in the hands of those that claimed to be the masters.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/25459545?referrer=searchResults
PLS HURRY I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLSSSSSSSSS
Select the TWO African regions on the map that remained independent through the nineteenth century.
Answer:
me, please
Explanation:
Answer: Liberia and Ethiopia remained independent during the 19th century.
Answer:
Liberia and Ethiopia remained independent during the 19th century
Explanation:
John Adams still believed that the term “massacre” was appropriate. Even though he was the defense attorney, what is his reason for making such a statement?
Answer: He was honored to serve his country in the defense for the trial and completely agreed with the verdict. He was disappointed to have to defend the British soldiers and disagreed with the verdict.
John Adams believed that the "Massacre" was appropriate. Adam had no consolation for the British government as he was a strong opponent of the Stamp Act yet he believed that the accused were innocent of the charge of murder and deserved a fair trial.
What was the Boston Massacre?The Boston Massacre was a historic street fight between "patriot" mob and the squad of British soldiers. The fight was occurred on March 5, 1770. It was a confrontation in Boston, in which a group of nine British soldiers shot five people.
The Boston Massacre was a deadly disturbance that occurred in 1770, on King Street in Boston. The battle was arised because British soldiers shot five people out of a crowd of above hundred people who were abusing them verbally and throwing snowballs, stones, and sticks.
Basically, the massacre resulted in the death of five colonists.
Learn more about Boston Massacre here:-
https://brainly.com/question/5601348
#SPJ2