Can someone please help me ASAP?? It’s due today!! I will give brainliest If It’s correct.

Please do part a, b, and c

The probability that the systolic blood pressure of a randomly chosen male will be in the range of 103 and 134 is roughly 0.875, or 0.875 to the nearest thousandth.

To find the probability that a randomly selected male's systolic blood pressure will be between 103 and 134, we need to calculate the z-scores for both values using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where the mean is, the standard deviation is, and x is the value we are interested in. After that, we may use a normal distribution calculator or table to determine the probabilities connected to the z-scores.

For x = 103:

z = (103 - 120) / 10 = -1.7

For x = 134:

z = (134 - 120) / 10 = 1.4

Now, we may use a calculator or table of the standard normal distribution to determine the probabilities corresponding to the z-scores of -1.7 and 1.4, respectively.

We discover that the probability associated with a z-score of -1.7 is 0.0446 and the probability associated with a z-score of 1.4 is 0.9192 using a conventional normal distribution table or calculator.

The difference between the probability associated with a z-score of 1.4 and the probability associated with a z-score of -1.7 therefore represents the probability that a randomly chosen male's systolic blood pressure will be between 103 and 134:

P(-1.7 < Z < 1.4) = P(Z < 1.4) - P(Z < -1.7)

= 0.9192 - 0.0446

= 0.8746

for such more question on probability

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

a. The employee will need to save $964,000 for retirement to have enough to live off 80% of their current annual gross wage and withdraw 4% the first year.

b. The account balance after 40 years would be approximately $1,173,919.74.

c. The difference between the employee's goal and the actual retirement account balance is -$209,919.74. The employee will not meet their retirement goal with the current contribution amount and interest rate.

a. Target Annual Income = 80% of Current Annual Gross Wage

= 80% of $48,200

= $48,200 * 0.8

= $38,560

Total Retirement Savings = Target Annual Income / Withdrawal Rate

= $38,560 / 0.04

= $964,000

Therefore, the employee will need to save $964,000 for retirement to have enough to live off 80% of their current annual gross wage and withdraw 4% the first year.

b. Account Balance = Monthly Contribution * (((1 + Monthly Interest Rate)^(Number of Months) - 1) / Monthly Interest Rate)

Convert the annual interest rate to a monthly interest rate:

Monthly Interest Rate = (1 + Annual Interest Rate)^(1/12) - 1

= (1 + 0.055)^(1/12) - 1

= 0.004433

Number of Months = Number of Years * 12

= 40 * 12

= 480

Calculate the account balance:

Account Balance = $400 * (((1 + 0.004433)^480 - 1) / 0.004433)

Using a calculator, the account balance after 40 years would be approximately $1,173,919.74 (rounded to the nearest cent).

c. The difference between the employee's retirement goal and the actual retirement account balance can be calculated by subtracting the account balance from the target amount:

Difference = Target Retirement Savings - Account Balance

= $964,000 - $1,173,919.74

= -$209,919.74

The result is negative, indicating that the actual retirement account balance falls short of the employee's goal by approximately $209,919.74.

Based on these calculations, the employee will not meet their retirement goal with the current contribution amount and interest rate.

Learn more about account on

https://brainly.com/question/29473582

#SPJ1

Univariate analyses involve examining a single variable to better understand its distribution, central tendency, and dispersion. Continuous variables, on the other hand, can take any value within a specific range, such as height or weight.

For discrete and continuous variables, different univariate analyses are appropriate. Discrete variables are those that can only take specific, distinct values, such as counts or categories. Appropriate univariate analyses for discrete variables include frequency tables, bar charts, and pie charts. Frequency tables show the distribution of values by listing each possible value and its corresponding count. Bar charts represent this information graphically, with the height of each bar corresponding to the count of each value. Pie charts display the proportion of each value in the overall distribution as a slice of a circle.
For continuous variables, appropriate univariate analyses include histograms, box plots, and density plots. Histograms divide the data range into equal intervals, or "bins," and display the count of values within each bin as bars. Box plots illustrate the distribution by showing the data's median, quartiles, and potential outliers. Density plots estimate the probability distribution of the data by using a continuous, smooth curve.
In summary, discrete variables can be analyzed using frequency tables, bar charts, and pie charts, while continuous variables can be examined using histograms, box plots, and density plots. These univariate analyses help visualize the distribution and characteristics of each variable type.

Learn more about Univariate analyses here:

https://brainly.com/question/28108411

#SPJ11

The coefficient of determination of 0.49 means that approximately 49% of the variability in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variable(s) in the regression model. In other words, the model is able to explain 49% of the total variation in the response variable.

The coefficient of correlation of 0.70 indicates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. It means that there is a high degree of association between the independent and dependent variables, and that the change in one variable is closely related to the change in the other variable. A correlation coefficient of 0.70 is considered a moderate to strong correlation, with values closer to 1 indicating a stronger relationship.

Know more about coefficient of determination here:

https://brainly.com/question/28975079

#SPJ11

Solving a linear equation, we can see that she make 18 mugs.

So we know that Amy starts with 55 pounds of clay, and she uses 12.7 to make a sculpture, so at this point she has:

55 - 12.7 = 42.3 pounds.

Now she uses 0.82 lb per mug that she makes, then after x mugs, the amount left is:

f(x) = 42.3 - 0.82x

Now we need to solve the linear equation:

27.54 = 42.3 - 0.82x

27.54 - 42.3 = -0.82x

-14.76/-0.82 = x

18 = x

She did 18 mugs.

Learn more about linear equations at.

https://brainly.com/question/1884491

#SPJ1

The streetlamp illuminates approximately B) 415.27 square meters of the street. So the correct option is (B) 415.27 square meters.

The area of a circle is given by the formula

[tex]A = \pi r^2,[/tex]

where r is the radius of the circle. In this case, the diameter of the circle is given as 23 meters, so the radius is half of that, or 23/2 = 11.5 meters.

Using the formula for the area of a circle and approximating π as 3.14, we get:

[tex]A = 3.14 \times (11.5)^2[/tex]

A ≈ 415.27

Therefore, the streetlamp illuminates approximately 415.27 square meters of the street. Rounded to the nearest hundredth, the answer is 415.27 [tex]m^2.[/tex]

So the correct option is (B) 415.27 m2.

for such more question on square meters

https://brainly.com/question/25092270

#SPJ11

Answer:

B) 415.27 square meters

Step-by-step explanation:

The Maclaurin series expansion for sin(x) is: sin(x) = x - /3! + [tex]x^5[/tex]/5! - [tex]x^7[/tex]/7!

To approximate sin(1/2) with a maximum error of 0.01, we need to find the smallest value of n for which the absolute value of the remainder term Rn(1/2) is less than 0.01.

The remainder term is given by:

Rn(x) = sin(x) - Pn(x)

where Pn(x) is the nth-degree Maclaurin polynomial for sin(x), given by:

Pn(x) = x - [tex]x^3[/tex]/3! + [tex]x^5[/tex]/5! - ... + (-1)(n+1) * x(2n-1)/(2n-1)!

Since we want the maximum error to be less than 0.01, we have:

|Rn(1/2)| ≤ 0.01

We can use the Lagrange form of the remainder term to get an upper bound for Rn(1/2):

|Rn(1/2)| ≤ |f(n+1)(c)| * |(1/2)(n+1)/(n+1)!|

where f(n+1)(c) is the (n+1)th derivative of sin(x) evaluated at some value c between 0 and 1/2.

For sin(x), the (n+1)th derivative is given by:

f^(n+1)(x) = sin(x + (n+1)π/2)

Since the derivative of sin(x) has a maximum absolute value of 1, we can bound |f(n+1)(c)| by 1:

|Rn(1/2)| ≤ (1) * |(1/2)(n+1)/(n+1)!|

We want to find the smallest value of n for which this upper bound is less than 0.01:

|(1/2)(n+1)/(n+1)!| < 0.01

We can use a table of values or a graphing calculator to find that the smallest value of n that satisfies this inequality is n = 3.

Therefore, the third-degree Maclaurin polynomial for sin(x) is:

P3(x) = x - [tex]x^3[/tex]/3! + [tex]x^5[/tex]/5!

and the approximation for sin(1/2) with a maximum error of 0.01 is:

sin(1/2) ≈ P3(1/2) = 1/2 - (1/2)/3! + (1/2)/5!

This approximation has an error given by:

|R3(1/2)| ≤ |f^(4)(c)| * |(1/2)/4!| ≤ (1) * |(1/2)/4!| ≈ 0.0024

which is less than 0.01, as required.

For similar question on Maclaurin series:

https://brainly.com/question/31745715

#SPJ11

So, Zaheda travelled by air for 3 hours. She travelled 900 km by air. (Distance travelled by the plane = 300 km/h × 3 h = 900 km)

Hence, the required answer is 3 hours and the distance Zaheda travelled by air is 900 km.

Given information: Zaheda travels for 6 hours partly by car at 100 km/h and partly by air at 300km/h. If she travelled a total distance of 1200 km we need to find out how long did she travel by air.

Solution: Let the time for which Zaheda travelled by car be t hours, then she travelled by air for (6 - t) hours. Speed of the car = 100 km/h Speed of the plane = 300 km/h Let the distance travelled by the car be 'D'. Therefore, distance travelled by the plane will be (1200 - D).

Now, we can form an equation using the speed, time, and distance using the formula, S = D/T where S = Speed, D = Distance, T = Time. Speed of the car = D/t (Using above formula) Speed of the plane = (1200 - D)/(6 - t) (Using above formula) Distance travelled by the car = Speed of the car × time= (100 × t) km Distance travelled by the plane = Speed of the plane × time = (300 × (6 - t)) km

The total distance travelled by Zaheda = Distance travelled by car + Distance travelled by plane= (100 × t) + (300 × (6 - t))= 100t + 1800 - 300t= -200t + 1800= 1200 [Given]So, -200t + 1800 = 1200 => -200t = -600 => t = 3 hours Therefore, the time for which Zaheda travelled by air = (6 - t)= 6 - 3= 3 hours. So, Zaheda travelled by air for 3 hours.

She travelled 900 km by air. (Distance travelled by the plane = 300 km/h × 3 h = 900 km)Hence, the required answer is 3 hours and the distance Zaheda travelled by air is 900 km.

To know more about Speed, click here

https://brainly.com/question/17661499

#SPJ11

The equation of the table is y=5x where 5 is the slope

The slope intercept form of a line is y=mx+b, where m is slope and b is the y intercept.

The slope of line passing through two points (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) is

m=y₂-y₁/x₂-x₁

Slope = 45-40/9-8

=5/1

Now let us find the y interept by taking an ordered pair (8, 40)

40 = 5(8)+b

b=0

So the equation of the table is y=5x

To learn more on slope of line click:

https://brainly.com/question/16180119

#SPJ1

The probability that you win at most once in the instant lottery when playing five times is approximately 0.4096.

To calculate the probability of winning at most once in the instant lottery when playing five times, we need to consider the different possibilities: winning zero times and winning once.

The probability of winning zero times (not winning) in one play is (1 - 0.2) = 0.8.

Since the outcomes are independent, the probability of winning zero times in five plays is (0.8)^5 = 0.32768.

The probability of winning once is given by the formula:

Probability of winning once = (number of ways to win once) * (probability of winning) * (probability of not winning the other times)

In this case, there is only one way to win once out of five plays, and the probability of winning is 0.2.

The probability of not winning the other four times is (1 - 0.2)^4 = 0.4096.

Therefore, the probability of winning once is 1 * 0.2 * 0.4096 = 0.08192.

To find the probability of winning at most once, we need to sum the probabilities of winning zero times and winning once:

Probability of winning at most once = Probability of winning zero times + Probability of winning once

= 0.32768 + 0.08192

= 0.4096

Therefore, the probability that you win at most once in the instant lottery when playing five times is approximately 0.4096.

The correct answer is option c: 0.4096.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

The solution to the initial value problem using Laplace transforms is x(t) = (-1/2)e^(3t)cos(2t) + (1/2)e^(3t)sin(2t).

To solve the given initial value problem using Laplace transforms, we'll apply the Laplace transform to both sides of the differential equation and solve for the Laplace transform of x(t). Let's denote the Laplace transform of x(t) as X(s).

Taking the Laplace transform of the differential equation, we have:

s^2X(s) - sx(0) - x'(0) - 6(sX(s) - x(0)) + 13X(s) = 1

Since x(0) = 0 and x'(0) = 0, the equation simplifies to:

s^2X(s) - 6sX(s) + 13X(s) = 1

Now, solving for X(s), we have:

X(s)(s^2 - 6s + 13) = 1

X(s) = 1 / (s^2 - 6s + 13)

To find the inverse Laplace transform of X(s), we need to factor the denominator of X(s):

s^2 - 6s + 13 = (s - 3)^2 + 4

The roots of this quadratic equation are complex: s = 3 ± 2i.

Using partial fraction decomposition, we can write X(s) as:

X(s) = A / (s - (3 - 2i)) + B / (s - (3 + 2i))

Multiplying both sides by the common denominator and simplifying, we get:

1 = A(s - (3 + 2i)) + B(s - (3 - 2i))

Now, we can solve for A and B by comparing coefficients:

1 = (A + B)s - (3A + 3B) + (-2Ai + 2Bi)

Comparing real and imaginary parts separately, we have:

Real part: 0 = (A + B)s - (3A + 3B)
Imaginary part: 1 = (-2A + 2B)i

From the real part equation, we get A + B = 0, which implies A = -B.

From the imaginary part equation, we get -2A + 2B = 1, which implies B = 1/2 and A = -1/2.

Therefore, the partial fraction decomposition becomes:

X(s) = (-1/2) / (s - (3 - 2i)) + (1/2) / (s - (3 + 2i))

Taking the inverse Laplace transform of X(s), we can find x(t):

x(t) = (-1/2)e^((3 - 2i)t) + (1/2)e^((3 + 2i)t)

Using Euler's formula e^(it) = cos(t) + i*sin(t), we can write x(t) as:

x(t) = (-1/2)e^(3t)cos(2t) + (1/2)e^(3t)sin(2t)

To learn more about Laplace transforms go to:

https://brainly.com/question/31040475

#SPJ11

To determine how many years it will take for Tom's investment to double, we can use the compound interest formula:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

Where:

A is the final amount (double the initial investment)

P is the principal amount (initial investment)

r is the annual interest rate (9.24% or 0.0924)

n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year (monthly, so n = 12)

t is the time in years

In this case, Tom wants his investment to double, so the final amount (A) will be $8,000 * 2 = $16,000. We can plug in these values and solve for t:

$16,000 = $8,000(1 + 0.0924/12)^(12t)

Dividing both sides by $8,000:

2 = (1 + 0.0924/12)^(12t)

Taking the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides:

ln(2) = ln[(1 + 0.0924/12)^(12t)]

Using the logarithmic property ln(a^b) = b * ln(a):

ln(2) = 12t * ln(1 + 0.0924/12)

Dividing both sides by 12 * ln(1 + 0.0924/12):

t = ln(2) / (12 * ln(1 + 0.0924/12))

Using a calculator, we find:

t ≈ 9.81

Therefore, it will take approximately 9.81 years (rounding to hundredths) for Tom's investment to double.

Learn more about approximately here:

https://brainly.com/question/31695967

#SPJ11

To determine the number of seconds it took for the cannonball to hit the ground, we need to look for the point in the table where the height is equal to zero.

From the given data, we can see that at 5 seconds, the height is 0 feet. Therefore, the cannonball hit the ground 5 seconds after it was dropped.

So the answer is: 5

Learn more about feet here:

https://brainly.com/question/15658113

#SPJ11

a) The volume generated by revolving the curve about the y-axis using the second Pappus-Guldinus theorem is V = 2π(0.64)

b) Using the first Pappus-Guldinus theorem, the y-coordinate of the centroid of the curve is y = 0.736.

c) The area of the surface generated by revolving the curve about the y-axis using the first Pappus-Guldinus theorem is A = 2π(0.736)(3.810)

a) The second Pappus-Guldinus theorem states that the volume generated by revolving a plane curve about an axis outside of the curve is equal to the product of the length of the curve and the distance traveled by the centroid of the curve. Applying this theorem to the given curve, we have V = 2π(0.64).

b) The first Pappus-Guldinus theorem states that the volume generated by revolving a plane curve about an axis is equal to the product of the area of the curve and the distance traveled by the centroid of the curve. In this case, we are given the length and area of the curve and are asked to find the y-coordinate of the centroid. Using the formula for the length of the curve and the given area,

we can find the radius of gyration of the curve about the x-axis. Then, using the formula for the centroid of a curve, we can find the y-coordinate of the centroid, which is y = 0.736.

c) Again, using the first Pappus-Guldinus theorem, we can find the area of the surface generated by revolving the curve about the y-axis. We have the length and the area of the curve, and we have already found the y-coordinate of the centroid in part

(b). Using these values, we can calculate the area of the surface generated by revolving the curve about the y-axis, which is A = 2π(0.736)(3.810).

Learn more about Pappus-Guldinus

brainly.com/question/12977692

#SPJ11

The relative change in tuition for the University of Washington from 2015/16 to 2016/17 is -16.7%. This means that the tuition in 2016/17 decreased by 16.7%.

According to the provided source, Washington state implemented tuition cutbacks, which resulted in a decrease in tuition fees. To calculate the relative change in tuition, we need to determine the percentage change between the initial and final tuition amounts.

The relative change in tuition is given by the formula: (final tuition - initial tuition) / initial tuition * 100%.

From the source, it is stated that the tuition at the University of Washington decreased by $1,088 from 2015/16 to 2016/17. The initial tuition in 2015/16 is not specified in the given information.

Assuming the initial tuition is denoted as "T", we can calculate the relative change as follows:

Relative change = ($1,088 / T) * 100%

Since the percentage change is rounded to one decimal place and we are asked to provide the absolute value, the relative change in tuition is -16.7%. This indicates that the tuition in 2016/17 decreased by 16.7% compared to the initial tuition.

Learn more about percentage here:

https://brainly.com/question/16797504

#SPJ11

Thus, the coordinates of points D and B for the given parallelogram are D=(-3,0) and B=(-1,6).

In the parallelogram ABCD, we are given coordinates A=(-4,3), B=(-1,b), C=(0,3), and D=(a,0). To find the values of a and b, we can use the properties of a parallelogram.

In a parallelogram, opposite sides are parallel and equal in length. We can use the midpoint formula to find the coordinates of the midpoint for both diagonal AC and diagonal BD. Since the diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other, these midpoints should be equal.

Midpoint formula: M = ((x1+x2)/2, (y1+y2)/2)

For diagonal AC:
M_AC = ((-4+0)/2, (3+3)/2) = (-2,3)

For diagonal BD:
M_BD = ((-1+a)/2, (b+0)/2)

Since the midpoints M_AC and M_BD are equal:
M_AC = M_BD
(-2,3) = ((-1+a)/2, b/2)

Now we can create two equations from the x and y coordinates:
1) -2 = (-1+a)/2
2) 3 = b/2

Solve the equations:

1) Multiply both sides by 2: -4 = -1+a
  Add 1 to both sides: -3 = a

2) Multiply both sides by 2: 6 = b

So, the values of a and b are a = -3 and b = 6. Therefore, the coordinates of points D and B are D=(-3,0) and B=(-1,6).

Know more about the parallelogram

https://brainly.com/question/970600

#SPJ11

The final output will be false since the two Circle objects have different memory addresses.

The output of the code sequence provided will be false, true, true, true, false, false, true, false. The first output will print the memory address of the two Circle objects, which will be different since they are created using two separate new Circle statements.

The second output will be true since the equals method in the Circle class compares the radii of the two Circle objects, and in this case, they both have a radius of 5.

The third output will also be true since the equals method is symmetric, meaning that if cl.equals(c2) is true, then c2.equals(cl) must also be true.

The fourth output will be true again because the equals method is reflexive, meaning that an object must always be equal to itself.

The fifth output will be false since the equals method for Circle objects only compares radii, and not any other attributes of the Circle objects.

The sixth output will also be false since the two Circle objects have different memory addresses.

The seventh output will be true again because the equals method is transitive, meaning that if cl.equals(c2) is true and c2.equals(c3) is true, then cl.equals(c3) must also be true.

The final output will be false since the two Circle objects have different memory addresses.

Learn more on circle objects here:

https://brainly.com/question/15099709

#SPJ11

If one hundred 98% confidence intervals are constructed for a population parameter, we would expect approximately 98 of the intervals to capture the unknown parameter.

In a 98% confidence interval, there is a 98% probability that the true population parameter lies within the interval. This means that if we were to construct 100 such intervals, we would expect about 98 of them to contain the true population parameter, and the remaining 2 intervals would not capture the unknown parameter. However, it's important to note that the actual number of intervals that capture the parameter may vary due to random sampling variability.

Learn more about confidence intervals here:

https://brainly.com/question/33920540

#SPJ12

To find the required sample size for a margin of error less than 3%, we can rearrange the formula for the margin of error:

[tex]n = (Z^2 * p * (1 - p)) / (E^2)[/tex]

Here, Z represents the critical value, p is the estimated proportion (0.51), and E is the desired margin of error (0.03)

To determine the margin of error for the 95% confidence interval, we need to use the formula:

Margin of Error = Critical value * Standard error

The critical value for a 95% confidence level can be obtained from the standard normal distribution table, which corresponds to 1.96. The standard error can be calculated using the following formula:

Standard error = [tex]\sqrt{(p * (1 - p) / n)}[/tex]

Given that the proportion of North Carolina residents planning to set off fireworks is estimated to be 51% (0.51) based on the survey, we can substitute the values into the formula. However, the sample size (n) is not provided in the question, so we need to determine it in the next part.

To find the required sample size for a margin of error less than 3%, we can rearrange the formula for the margin of error:

[tex]n = (Z^2 * p * (1 - p)) / (E^2)[/tex]

Here, Z represents the critical value, p is the estimated proportion (0.51), and E is the desired margin of error (0.03). Substituting these values into the formula, we can solve for the required sample size.

Learn more about standard normal distribution here:https://brainly.com/question/15103234

#SPJ11

If we have two series, ∑an and ∑bn, with positive terms and it is known that ∑an is divergent, and if an > bn for all n, then we can conclude that ∑bn is also divergent.

This can be understood by considering the comparison test for series convergence. The comparison test states that if 0 ≤ bn ≤ an for all n, and if ∑an is divergent, then ∑bn must also be divergent.

In our case, since an > bn for all n, it follows that 0 ≤ bn ≤ an. Therefore, by the comparison test, if ∑an is divergent, then ∑bn must also be divergent.

Intuitively, if the terms of ∑bn are smaller than the terms of ∑an, and ∑an diverges (i.e., its terms do not approach ), then ∑bn must also diverge because its terms are even smaller.

Therefore, if ∑an is known to be divergent and an > bn for all n, we can conclude that ∑bn is also divergent.

learn more about "divergent":- https://brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

The dimension of the column space of the given 7 × 6 matrix is 1.

By the rank-nullity theorem, the dimension of the column space of a matrix is equal to the difference between the number of columns and the dimension of its null space. In this case, we have a 7 × 6 matrix with a null space of dimension 5.

Let's denote the dimension of the column space as c. According to the rank-nullity theorem, we have:

c + 5 = 6

Solving for c, we subtract 5 from both sides:

c = 6 - 5 = 1

Therefore, the dimension of the column space of the given 7 × 6 matrix is 1.

learn more about "theorem":- https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ11

We can estimate that roughly 50% of regulation soccer balls have a circumference greater than 69.9 cm (or exactly 70 cm).

According to the regulations set by FIFA, the circumference of a regulation soccer ball must be between 68cm and 70cm. Assuming that manufacturers adhere to these regulations, we can assume that the percentage of soccer balls with a circumference greater than 69.9 cm is equal to the percentage of soccer balls with a circumference of exactly 70 cm.

The midpoint between 68 cm and 70 cm is 69 cm, and since the circumference of a sphere is proportional to its radius, the circumference of a regulation soccer ball with a radius of 10.97 cm (which corresponds to a circumference of 69 cm) is approximately equal to the circumference of a soccer ball with a radius of 11.11 cm (which corresponds to a circumference of 70 cm).

Therefore, we can estimate that roughly 50% of regulation soccer balls have a circumference greater than 69.9 cm (or exactly 70 cm) and round to the nearest tenth of a percent.

Learn more about radius

brainly.com/question/13449316

#SPJ11

The total area is 0.0102.

The area to the left of z1=−2.575 is given by the standard normal cumulative distribution function as:

P(Z < -2.575) = 0.0051 (rounded to four decimal places)

The area to the right of z2=2.575 is the same as the area to the left of -2.575, since the standard normal curve is symmetric about the mean:

P(Z > 2.575) = P(Z < -2.575) = 0.0051

The total of the areas under the standard normal curve to the left of z1=−2.575 and to the right of z2=2.575 is:

0.0051 + 0.0051 = 0.0102

Therefore, the total area is 0.0102.

To know more about cumulative distribution refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/30402457

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]-\infty < y\le0[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The y-values (range/output/graph) cover the portion [tex](-\infty,0][/tex]

The interval is always open on [tex]-\infty[/tex] and [tex]\infty[/tex] because their values are unknown => It is impossible to reach [tex]-\infty[/tex] and [tex]\infty[/tex]

Answer: Therefore, the uncertainty for x – y is 0.36. We can express the result as:

x – y = 0.4 ± 0.4.

Note that we rounded the uncertainty to one significant figure, consistent with the number of significant figures in the given uncertainties for x and y.

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate the uncertainty for x – y, we need to first calculate the uncertainty for the difference between x and y. We can do this by using the formula for the propagation of uncertainties:

δ(x - y) = √( δx² + δy² )

where δx and δy are the uncertainties for x and y, respectively.

Substituting the given values, we get:

δ(x - y) = √( (0.2)² + (0.3)² )

= √( 0.04 + 0.09 )

= √0.13

≈ 0.36

Therefore, the uncertainty for x – y is 0.36. We can express the result as:

x – y = 0.4 ± 0.4.

Note that we rounded the uncertainty to one significant figure, consistent with the number of significant figures in the given uncertainties for x and y.

To Know more about uncertainty for x – y refer here

https://brainly.com/question/4954008#

#SPJ11

The required answer is  the function f: [0, +∞) → [0, +∞) given by {(x, y): y = x^2} becomes bijective.

To make the function f: R → R given by {(x, y): y = x^2} bijective, we need to restrict the domain and codomain so that the function is both injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto).

Step 1: Restrict the domain to make the function injective.
The function is not injective in its current form because for some distinct x values, the y values are equal (for example, x = 1 and x = -1 both give y = 1). To make it injective, we can restrict the domain to either non-negative real numbers (x ≥ 0) or non-positive real numbers (x ≤ 0).

Step 2: Restrict the codomain to make the function surjective.
In its current form, the function is not surjective because there are y values in the co-domain with no corresponding x values (for example, y = -1 has no x value that satisfies y = x^2). To make it surjective, we can restrict the co-domain to non-negative real numbers (y ≥ 0).
So,

if we restrict the domain to non-negative real numbers (x ≥ 0) and the co-domain to non-negative real numbers (y ≥ 0),

the function f: [0, +∞) → [0, +∞) given by {(x, y): y = x^2} becomes bijective.

To know more about the bijective. Click on the link.

https://brainly.com/question/30857450

#SPJ11

The standard deviation of the value of the variable at the end of 3 years is 3√3.

a) To find the expected value of the variable x after 3 years, we can use the properties of the Wiener process. The expected value of the variable at any given time t is given by:

E[x(t)] = x(0) + a * t

Given that x(0) = 10 and a = 2, we can substitute these values into the equation:

E[x(3)] = 10 + 2 * 3 = 10 + 6 = 16

Therefore, the expected value of the variable x after 3 years is 16.

b) The standard deviation of the value of the variable at the end of 3 years can be calculated using the formula:

σ = √(b^2 * t)

Given that b = 3 and t = 3, we can substitute these values into the formula:

σ = √(3^2 * 3) = √(9 * 3) = √27 = 3√3

Therefore, the standard deviation of the value of the variable at the end of 3 years is 3√3.

learn more about "equation":- https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ11

In this case, since the base is 16 feet and the height is 13 feet, we can calculate the area as (1/2) * 16 * 13 = 104 square feet. This means that Sharon will need to paint an area of 104 square feet on the wall.

To find the area of the wall to be painted, we can use the formula for the area of a triangle, which is given by the formula A = (1/2) * base * height.

In this case, the base of the triangle is 16 feet and the height is 13 feet. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

A = (1/2) * 16 * 13

A = 8 * 13

A = 104 square feet

Therefore, the area of the wall to be painted is 104 square feet.

The area of a triangle is calculated by multiplying the length of the base by the height of the triangle and dividing it by 2.

Learn more about triangle here:

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ11

Answer:

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

2x + 15 = 27 - 4x

add 4x to both sides:

2x + 15 + 4x = 27 -4x + 4x

that is 6x + 15 = 27

subtract 15 from both sides:

6x + 15 - 15 = 27 - 15

that is 6x = 12

divide both sides by 6:

x = 2

[tex]\huge\text{Hey there!}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{2x + 15 = 27 - 4x }[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{2x + 15 = -4x + 27}[/tex]

[tex]\large\text{ADD 4x to BOTH SIDES}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{2x + 15 - 4x = -4x + 27 + 4x}[/tex]

[tex]\large\text{SIMPLIFY it}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{2x + 4x + 15 = 27}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{6x + 15 = 27}[/tex]

[tex]\large\text{SUBTRACT 15 to BOTH SIDES}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{6x + 15 - 15 = 27 - 15}[/tex]

[tex]\large\text{SIMPLIFY it}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{6x = 27 - 15}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{6x = 12}[/tex]

[tex]\large\text{DIVIDE 6 to BOTH SIDES}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{\dfrac{6x}{6} = \dfrac{12}{6}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{x= \dfrac{12}{6}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{x= 2}[/tex]

[tex]\huge\text{Therefore your answer should be:}\\\\\huge\boxed{\mathtt{x = 2}}\huge\checkmark[/tex]

[tex]\huge\text{Good luck on your assignment \& enjoy your day!}[/tex]