Answer:
My fellow Americans,
We find ourselves in the midst of a great and terrible conflict. Brother against brother, neighbor against neighbor, our nation is torn apart by the ravages of war. The Union is in peril, and the future of our great republic hangs in the balance. But I stand before you today to offer hope, to offer a vision of a better future, a future where we are united as one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Let me be clear: the issue at the heart of this conflict is slavery. It is a blight upon our nation, a stain upon our honor as a people. It is an evil that must be eradicated, and I pledge to you that I will do all in my power to bring it to an end. But we must recognize that this is a complex issue, one that cannot be solved overnight. We must find a way to do away with slavery in a manner that is just and equitable to all parties involved.
To my fellow citizens of the Confederacy, I implore you to reconsider your position. I understand that you believe that you are fighting for your rights, for your way of life. But I ask you to consider the greater good, to think of the future of our country. We must remain united, for the sake of all Americans, regardless of where they were born or what color their skin may be. We are all part of this great experiment in democracy, and we must work together to ensure that it endures.
To my fellow citizens of the Union, I ask that you show compassion and understanding towards those who have taken up arms against us. They are not our enemies, but our brothers and sisters, and we must seek to bring them back into the fold. We must find a way to bridge the gap between us, to build a stronger, more united nation.
In closing, let me say that I believe in the power of compromise. I believe that we can find a way to end this war, to bring an end to slavery, and to preserve the Union for generations to come. But we must be willing to listen to one another, to put aside our differences and work towards a common goal. I ask that you join me in this effort, that we may once again be a nation united, strong, and free.
Thank you, and God bless America.
Explanation:
Who was the patron for this painting raphael the subject of this painting reflects the renaissance interest
Answer:
Explanation:
Raphael, like many artists during the Renaissance, had various patrons who commissioned his works. Some of his most notable patrons included the popes of his time, as well as wealthy and powerful families such as the Medici family of Florence.
As for the subject matter of his paintings, Raphael's works reflected the interests and ideals of the Renaissance, which were focused on humanism, individualism, and classical antiquity. Many of his paintings depicted religious or mythological scenes, often featuring idealized human figures that emphasized physical beauty, grace, and balance. He also incorporated classical elements such as perspective, proportion, and symmetry into his works, which reflected the renewed interest in classical art and culture during the Renaissance.
Raphael's Renaissance paintings were usually sponsored by distinguished individuals or organizations, typically from the nobility, royalty, or the Church. They largely depict religious or classical themes, representing the era's fascination with humanism, nature, and realism.
Explanation:The painting by Raphael in question, if it falls flawlessly within the Renaissance era, is likely to have been sponsored or commissioned by a high-ranking individual or organization, often royalty, nobility, or the Church. This is due to the fact that during the Renaissance, patronage was widely utilized as a tool to increase one's prominence and standing in society. The subject matter of Renaissance paintings usually involved religious or classical themes, which reflected the era's interest in humanism, nature, and realism.
Learn more about Renaissance Art here:https://brainly.com/question/32876675
#SPJ2
In 1972, President Richard Nixon and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev met. One major factor for this meeting was
Question 1 options:
the cold war was crippling the economy of both countries.
under the leader ship of Brezhnev, the Soviet Union was considering changing its form of leadership from communism to a democracy.
Nixon wanted to expand the Environmental Protection Agency from the United States to the Soviet Union.
Nixon wanted to end the space race with the Soviets.
In 1972, President Richard Nixon and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev met. One major factor for this meeting was
the cold war was crippling the economy of both countries.What was reached in the meeting between President Richard Nixon and Soviet leader Leonid BrezhnevThe meeting between President Nixon and Soviet leader Brezhnev in 1972 was primarily driven by the need to ease tensions and reduce the arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union, which were both facing economic difficulties due to the cost of maintaining their military forces.
The meeting resulted in the signing of several arms control agreements, including the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I), which helped to reduce the risk of nuclear war between the two superpowers.
Learn more about Richard Nixon at:
https://brainly.com/question/16135947
#SPJ1
Relevance of understanding the philippine poetry and prose during the spanish colonial period
Understanding Philippine poetry and prose during the Spanish colonial period is important because it provides insight into the country's cultural and historical identity.
Literature during this period reflects the struggles and resistance of Filipinos against Spanish colonization, as well as their attempts to preserve their own cultural traditions and values. It also shows how Philippine literature was shaped by Spanish influence and how it evolved over time. Moreover, it highlights the role of literature in shaping the Filipino consciousness and in promoting nationalism and social awareness. By studying Philippine literature during the Spanish colonial period, we gain a better understanding of our cultural heritage and the ongoing struggle for social and political liberation.
To know more about Spanish colonial period click here:
brainly.com/question/4488404
#SPJ4
pierre bourdieu (1977) argues that children from upper-and middle-class families are advantaged in the educational system due to their possession of which of these?
Pierre Bourdieu (1977) argues that children from upper-and middle-class families are advantaged in the educational system due to their possession of cultural capital, including knowledge, values, and language.
According to Pierre Bourdieu (1977), children from upper-and middle-class families are advantaged in the educational system due to their possession of cultural capital.
Cultural capital refers to the non-financial assets that facilitate social mobility in a stratified society.In the educational system, cultural capital refers to the informal cultural knowledge that students bring to the classroom, which affects their educational performance and their prospects for social mobility. Bourdieu (1977) argued that the education system perpetuates social inequality by rewarding the cultural capital of the dominant class and penalizing the cultural capital of the lower classes.Children from middle- and upper-class families have access to resources that enable them to develop and cultivate cultural capital, such as books, art, and other forms of high culture. Furthermore, they are exposed to a cultural background that emphasizes intellectualism, creativity, and autonomy. As a result, they are well-prepared to succeed in the education system.The education system is based on the cultural capital of the dominant class, which is often transmitted through the hidden curriculum. The hidden curriculum refers to the non-academic norms and values that are taught in schools, such as obedience, punctuality, and conformity. These norms and values favor the cultural capital of the dominant class, which is often characterized by individualism, autonomy, and creativity.In conclusion, Bourdieu (1977) argued that cultural capital is a crucial factor in determining educational success and social mobility in a stratified society. Children from middle- and upper-class families possess cultural capital that is valued by the education system, which gives them an advantage over children from working-class families.
For more such questions on Pierre Bourdieu
https://brainly.com/question/14242244
#SPJ11
how was great britain able to win the battle of britain?
The Battle of Britain was won by Great Britain through the development of new technology and strategic planning. The Battle of Britain was fought between the German and British air forces over the United Kingdom from July to September 1940. The German Luftwaffe made repeated bombing runs over the UK with the goal of weakening British air and naval defenses in preparation for a ground invasion.
The Royal Air Force (RAF) of Great Britain, on the other hand, was tasked with defending the UK's airspace and preventing the German invasion. There were several reasons for the British victory in the Battle of Britain:
1. The development of radar technology and the creation of an advanced command and control system that allowed for quick and efficient deployment of RAF fighter planes to areas where they were most needed.
2. The superior training and experience of British pilots, who were able to take on German pilots with their outdated aircraft.
3. The utilization of new British aircraft like the Spitfire and Hurricane that were faster, more maneuverable, and had better firepower than their German counterparts.
4. The British were also able to inflict significant damage on the German forces through strategic bombing campaigns on German airfields and supply lines.
5. Lastly, British resilience and determination played a vital role in their victory, with civilians and military personnel alike coming together to defend their homeland against the German onslaught.
For more such questions on Battle of Britain
https://brainly.com/question/4098402
#SPJ11
In 1994 in Rwanda, Hutu extremists committed ethnic genocide when they systematically killed hundreds of thousands of Tutsi, as well as Hutu moderates. Place the events leading up to the 1994 Rwandan genocide in chronological order.
-Belgian colonists placed Tutsi in elite positions of power.
-Hutu rebelled against Tutsi power and gained control of the country.
-A civil war erupted between the Hutu and the Tutsi.
-The Rwandan president, a Hutu, was killed.
-Hutu extremists undertook an extensive campaign of genocide against Tutsi.
Answer:
Belgian colonists placed Tutsi in elite positions of power.
Hutu rebelled against Tutsi power and gained control of the country.
A civil war erupted between the Hutu and the Tutsi.
The Rwandan president, a Hutu, was killed.
Hutu extremists undertook an extensive campaign of genocide against Tutsi.
Explanation:
what does the vishnu schist tell you about the history of the grand canyon prior to the formation of the canyon itself? what is the order of events in the grand canyon? place the following events in the order in which they happened. rank from oldest to most recent events. view available hint(s)for part b resethelp most recent eventoldest event
To know about the history of Grand Canyon before its formation, one should analyze Vishnu Schist. The Vishnu Schist is a thick rock formation present in the Grand Canyon that dates back to Precambrian time.
The age of Vishnu Schist is estimated to be around 2 billion years old. The presence of the Vishnu Schist in the Grand Canyon region indicates that the formation of the Grand Canyon took place after the Vishnu Schist was formed.
Therefore, it is important in reconstructing the geological history of the canyon.Order of events in Grand CanyonThe order of events in the Grand Canyon happened as follows:
Deposition of sedimentary rocks in the Inner GorgeCreation of the Inner GorgeFormation of the Vishnu SchistUplift and tilting of the Grand Canyon region by tectonic forcesErosion of the plateau by the Colorado RiverMost recent event:
Deposition of sedimentary rocks in the Inner GorgeOldest event: Formation of Vishnu Schist.
To know more about Grand Canyon refer here
https://brainly.com/question/13394878#
#SPJ11
put these in order english colonies settle in jamestown, europeans explore the americas, the french and indian war ends, the colonies become a free country, the revolutionary war begins, only indians lived in North Americans
Answer:
1. Only Indians lived in North America (before European arrival)
2. Europeans explore the Americas
3. English colonies settle in Jamestown
4. The French and Indian War ends
5. The colonies become a free country
6. The Revolutionary War begins.
(please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest)(please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest)(please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest)
what were spaniards born in spain residing in the new world called?
The Spaniards born in Spain who resided in the New World were referred to as Peninsulares.
Peninsulares are Spaniards born in Spain who reside in the New World. Peninsulares are Spanish-born persons who were appointed to govern Spanish colonies in the Americas.
The term is derived from "peninsula," a term used to describe the Iberian Peninsula, which is the birthplace of most Spaniards. In the colonies, the Peninsulares were the highest-ranking social class, owing to their birthplace and European roots.
They held high positions in the military, church, and government, and they usually had more wealth and education than the other classes. Among the New World Spaniards, there were three main groups: the Peninsulares, the Criollos, and the Mestizos.
The Peninsulares were born in Spain and resided in the Americas, while the Criollos were born in the Americas to Spanish parents. The Mestizos were people of mixed European and Indigenous American ancestry who were born in the Americas.
For such more question on Peninsulares:
https://brainly.com/question/3617951
#SPJ11
what did germany, austria-hungary and italy make up?
Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy formed Triple Alliance. Although it provided some protection against hostile action, it did not take into account how events must unfold.
Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany founded the Triple partnership to be a defense a collaboration. Each of the countries resolved to stand by one another in the event that French as well as Russian launched an attack. Safety for everyone had been the goal of treaty formation; establishing ties with other strong nations prevented your adversaries from attacking you. An entire nation would have had to battle all of its coalition partners once it launched to battle with a particular nation. The following collaboration's vulnerability was the reality that its actions were have been just reactionary in essence.
Learn more on Germany
https://brainly.com/question/1061130
#SPJ4
what does the phrase closing the American frontier mean
Answer:
it means ending the time when people where cow boys.
Explanation:
which 1857 supreme court ruling declared slaves to be property and nullified the missouri compromise?
Dred Scott Case in Missouri, 1846–1855. The United States Supreme Court supported slavery in American territories, rejected the legitimacy of black citizenship in the United States, and ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional in its 1857 ruling, which shocked the whole country.
What is meant by slavery?Slavery has been practiced historically in a variety of forms, including chattel, bond, forced labor, and sexual slavery. The basic elements of slavery, as is commonly acknowledged, include the deprivation of liberty of movement and legal rights.In the 1500s, European settlers introduced slavery to the western hemisphere. White settlers increasingly relied on imported slaves from Africa as a source of cheap labor after failing to locate it elsewhere. In British North America by the early 1700s, slavery was exclusively associated with Africa.Human trafficking, "trafficking in humans," and "modern slavery" are used as catch-all phrases to describe both forced labor and sex trafficking.To learn more about slavery, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/567921
What was not part of the mission assigned to troops sent to the former confederation states under the reconstruction laws of 1867?
The mission assigned to troops sent to the former confederation states under the Reconstruction laws of 1867 did not include voting rights enforcement, as that was not mandated until the passage of the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870.
The mission assigned to troops sent to the former confederation states under the reconstruction laws of 1867 was to protect the rights of newly freed African Americans and ensure the states were complying with the terms of readmission to the Union.
However, the option that was not a part of the mission assigned to troops sent to the former confederation states under the reconstruction laws of 1867 is, "establishing free public education systems."What was the mission assigned to troops sent to the former confederation states under the reconstruction laws of 1867?The mission assigned to troops sent to the former confederation states under the reconstruction laws of 1867 were to protect the rights of newly freed African Americans and ensure the states were complying with the terms of readmission to the Union.The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 consisted of five laws that divided the South into five military districts, each under the authority of a U.S. military commander. Their primary goal was to guarantee the rights of former slaves in the former confederation states, to ensure their access to legal protection and voting rights, and to rebuild the Southern economy.
For more such questions on Reconstruction laws
https://brainly.com/question/16418754
#SPJ11
Why was the "Gag Rule" passed in 1836?
A. To prevent southern states from seceding from the country
B. To forbid discussion of abolition or anti-slavery petitions
C. To empower the president to send federal troops to South Carolina
D. To eliminate protective tariffs passed under the American System
B. To forbid discussion of abolition or anti-slavery petitions
in the republic, socrates claims that even among a group of bad people, they have to be just to each other to succeed at what they commonly try to achieve.
In The Republic, Socrates claims that even among a group of bad people, they have to be just to each other to succeed at what they commonly try to achieve. Hence, the statement is true.
Socrates was a Greek philosopher who lived in Athens in the fifth century BCE. He is considered one of the most influential figures in Western philosophy.
Socrates and the philosophySocrates' philosophy is based on the concept of an examined life. He believed that the unexamined life was not worth living. According to him, the pursuit of wisdom and knowledge should be the central goal of human existence. Socrates said that virtue was knowledge, and that if people knew what was right, they would do what was right. Socrates' philosophy had a profound impact on the ancient societies in which he lived.
His teachings focused on the importance of living a virtuous life and being true to oneself. He believed that people should adapt to their environment and society, but also demand more of themselves in order to improve their lives. Socrates' philosophy was based on his own experiences and observations of human behavior. He said that people should not be judged based on their wealth or social status, but on their character and actions.
Learn more about Socrates: https://brainly.com/question/20256015
#SPJ11
President Theodore Roosevelt defined "civilized" and "uncivilized" nations on the basis of. A. race. B. naval power. C. economic development
President Theodore Roosevelt did not define "civilized" and "uncivilized" nations solely on the basis of race, naval power, or economic development. However, he did use these factors, along with others, to describe and compare different nations in his writings and speeches.
Roosevelt's definition of a "civilized" nation included a range of qualities such as strong institutions, effective government, respect for individual rights, and economic and technological advancement. He also believed that "civilized" nations had a responsibility to promote these values and spread their influence to other nations.
On the other hand, Roosevelt described "uncivilized" nations as those that lacked these qualities and were often characterized by poverty, political instability, and social unrest. However, he also recognized that there were some exceptions, such as indigenous cultures that had their own distinct traditions and way of life.
Overall, Roosevelt's definition of "civilized" and "uncivilized" nations was complex and multifaceted, and based on a range of factors beyond just race, naval power, or economic development.
To learn more about uncivilized refer to:
brainly.com/question/31032768
#SPJ4
why did a system of free enterprise emerge in the united states?
The British largely permitted free enterprise to develop in its North American Colonies because they recognized it was the system most capable for bringing in wealth.
After being trapped by the Germans in Belgium, the only port remaining open for Britain and France to evacuate their surviving troops was atDunkirkNorway and DenmarkCzechoslovakia
After being trapped by the Germans in Belgium, the only port remaining open for Britain and France to evacuate their surviving troops was Dunkirk.
The German army had driven the Allies back to the English Channel during World War II, trapping them on the beaches of Dunkirk, France. The situation was critical because the German army was closing in and there was a chance that the Allies might be killed or kidnapped. In response, the British started Operation Dynamo, a significant operation to remove as many soldiers as possible off the beaches of Dunkirk.
More than three lakh allied soldiers were rescued from beaches over period of nine days in late May and early 1940 by a flotilla of ships made up of military ships, non-military boats, and fishing boats. During early stages of World War II, the successful evacuation of the troops from Dunkirk was a crucial event.
Read more about Dunkirk on:
https://brainly.com/question/21095985
#SPJ4
compare the degree of success in the practice of absolutism in Russia under peter the great with the degree of success it had in France under Louis xiv (an LEQ)
Louis relied on a extra aggressive and controlling method, whereas Peter went with a passive aggressive effort.
Louis XIV and Peter the Great dominated their international locations in a similar way the usage of PERSIA categories, but overall there influence of that manage are different.
What was absolutism in France below Louis XIII and Louis XIV?Image end result for evaluate the diploma of success in the practice of absolutism in Russia under peter the high-quality with the diploma of success it had in France under Louis xiv (an LEQ)
Absolutism was a gadget of authorities in which all sovereignty resided with the king, actual to Louis XIV's dictum: “I am the state.”
Particularly in France and Germany, the wars of religion had seriously weakened national governments and monarchies.
Learn more about Russia here;
https://brainly.com/question/1349804
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP ME I REALLY NEED IT
Answer:
what question?
Explanation:
why did the thirteen colonies fight a war for independence from britain?
Answer:
why did the thirteen colonies fight a war for independence from britain?
Explanation:
The thirteen colonies fought a war for independence from Britain for a variety of reasons. Some of the main reasons include:
Taxation without representation: The colonists felt that they were being unfairly taxed by the British government without having any representation in the British Parliament. They believed that only elected representatives from their own colonies should have the power to tax them.
Economic restrictions: The British government placed many economic restrictions on the colonies, such as prohibiting them from trading with other countries. The colonists believed that these restrictions were hurting their ability to develop their own economies and industries.
Political control: The British government had a great deal of control over the colonies, including the ability to appoint governors and judges. The colonists believed that this was a violation of their rights as English citizens.
Religious and cultural differences: The colonies were made up of people from a variety of different religious and cultural backgrounds, and they felt that the British government did not understand or respect their unique needs and perspectives.
Desire for self-rule: Ultimately, the colonists wanted to govern themselves and have control over their own destinies. They believed that they were capable of creating their own government and that they deserved the right to do so.
All of these factors contributed to the decision of the thirteen colonies to fight for independence from Britain and establish their own government. The resulting American Revolution was a pivotal moment in world history, and it led to the creation of a new nation founded on principles of liberty and self-rule.
What was the Trujillo government like?
The Trujillo government was marked by repression, violence, and inequality, and its legacy continues to impact the Dominican Republic to this day.
What was Trujillo Government about?The Trujillo government, also known as the Trujillo dictatorship, refers to the regime led by Rafael Leonidas Trujillo, who ruled the Dominican Republic from 1930 to 1961.
During Trujillo's rule, the government was characterized by authoritarianism, repression, and brutality. Trujillo's regime was marked by a cult of personality, with the dictator portrayed as a father figure and protector of the nation. The government was highly centralized, with Trujillo exercising total control over all branches of government, the military, and the economy.
Learn more about Trujillo government here: https://brainly.com/question/28343241
#SPJ1
What could a foreign visitor to ancient Rome expect to see in the Forum?
A. a track for chariot races
B. a central gathering place
C. a wealthy country house
D. a site of fights with lions
A central gathering place foreign visitor to ancient Rome expect to see in the Forum .
Option b is correct .
Rome's Colosseum and Circus Maximus, two well-known locations, would play host to spectacular processions, exotic animals, gladiator fights, chariot races, executions, and even fake naval warfare. An immigrant to the empire of the fourth century may lawfully move anywhere, work any craft, and be anyone despite the restrictions of not being a citizen. From the climate to the cuisine to the professions that its residents chose, each of Rome's provinces had something special to draw visitors.
A peregrinus was a free provincial subject of the early Roman Empire who was not a Roman citizen, existing from 30 BC to AD 212. In the first and second century AD, the majority of the people living in the Empire were Peregrini.
Hence, Option b is correct .
To know more about chariot races visit :
https://brainly.com/question/12089197
#SPJ4
2. Answer the following questions:
1. What was the role of the use of credit in creating the Great Depression?
2. What was the role of The Federal Reserve in creating the Great Depression?
3. What is a tariff? (you may need to do additional research for the answer)
4. How did the Smoot-Hawley Tariff contribute to extending or prolonging the Great
Depression?
Answer:
The use of credit played a significant role in creating the Great Depression. During the 1920s, there was a rapid expansion of credit and speculation in the stock market, which led to an artificial boom in the economy. People were encouraged to buy goods on credit, including stocks, cars, and homes. However, this expansion of credit was not backed by an increase in productivity, and eventually, the debts could not be repaid. As a result, the stock market crashed, and the economy collapsed.
The Federal Reserve, which is responsible for managing the US money supply, played a role in creating the Great Depression by contributing to the stock market bubble of the 1920s. The Federal Reserve kept interest rates low, which encouraged people to borrow and invest in the stock market. However, when the stock market crashed, the Federal Reserve did not act quickly enough to increase the money supply and stabilize the economy. Instead, it tightened monetary policy, which further worsened the economic downturn.
A tariff is a tax on imported or exported goods. Tariffs are usually imposed to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. Tariffs can increase the price of imported goods, making them less competitive with domestically produced goods.
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 was a high tariff on imported goods that contributed to extending and prolonging the Great Depression. The tariff was intended to protect American farmers and manufacturers from foreign competition. However, other countries responded by imposing their tariffs on American goods, which made it harder for American businesses to sell their products abroad. This led to a reduction in trade, which contributed to a global economic slowdown. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff also increased the cost of imported goods, which reduced consumer purchasing power and led to a further contraction of the economy.
(please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest)
as demonstrated during the ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
The documentation of events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising allowed for the dissemination of information that may have been suppressed or distorted by traditional media outlets (option A).
Social media and citizen journalists provided real-time updates and footage of the protests, allowing for a global audience to witness the events as they unfolded. This helped to galvanize international support for the protesters and put pressure on the Ukrainian government to address their grievances. Additionally, the documentation of police brutality and human rights violations helped to hold those responsible accountable for their actions.
Overall, the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising include increased transparency, accountability, and support for social and political change.
Option A is the correct answer.
"
Complete quesion
As demonstrated during the ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
A- The documentation of events on a grassroots level.
B- The hindrance of events.
"
You can learn more about Ukraine uprising at
https://brainly.com/question/26824054
#SPJ11
Based on Beck’s account, what were some of the hardships that prisoners faced on the Bataan Death March? Check all of the boxes that apply.
Answer:
where are the boxes im confused
Explanation:
hope this helped
What are all the surviving world religions, what are their holy scriptures, and how old are they?
The surviving world religions are
Buddhism
Christianity
Hinduism
Islam
Judaism.
The surviving religion holy scriptures.
Buddhism has Tripitakas
Christianity has The Bible
Hinduism has The Vedas
Islam has The Qur'an
Judaism has Hebrew scriptures or Tanakh.
The ages of the religions
Buddhism is 2500 years
Christianity is 2000 years
Hinduism is 4000 years
Islam is 1400 years
Judaism is 3500 years.
What is ReligionReligion is a medium in which people communicate with their creator. It is a particular faith and worship. Most people around the world has one religion they believe in and it has some way shape their way of life. Religion and culture work hand in hand as each religion has basic tenets the followers must follow. This has somehow shape their lives and ideology.
There are more other 3000 religions in the world but not most of them have survived the changing world. The religions that have survived are Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam and Judaism. They are like the major religions and have the highest followers.
Learn more about religion here
https://brainly.com/question/1808291
#SPJ1
1. ¿Alguna autoridad o institución ha organizado a nuestra comunidad para el cuidado y producción de especies vegetales y animales del territorio? Desarrollemos la respuesta. Actores sociales ¿Qué alimentos nativos se han cuidado y promovido?¿Cómo han promovido el cuidado y producción de sus alimentos nativos en nuestro territorio?Autoridades, líderes comunales, población. 1. ………………. 2. ………………. 3. ………………. 1. ………………. 2. ………………. 3. ………………. Instituciones públicas y/o privadas1. ………………. 2. ………………. 3. ………………. 1. ………………. 2. ………………. 3. ………………
Translation -Has any authority or institution organized our community for the care and production of plant and animal species in the territory? Let's develop the answer. Social actors What native foods have been cared for and promoted? How have they promoted the care and production of their native foods in our territory? Authorities, community leaders, population. Public and/or private institutions.
Government and other international authorities such as IUCN, CITES and local government organizations are working towards community for the care and production of plant and animal species in the territory.
Agriculture has a positive impact on everyone's quality of life, especially the poorest ones, in an environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable way. Older farmers are less likely to adopt the new technologies required to sustainably increase agricultural productivity and, ultimately, feed the expanding global population while protecting the environment. This is true even though the majority of the world's food is produced by (aging) smallholder farmers in developing nations. Governmental and non-governmental organizations make up a unique membership of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). IUCN is the world's leading authority on the condition of the natural world and the steps that should be taken to protect it thanks to the experience, resources, and reach of its more than 1,400 Organizations and the input of about 15,000 experts.
Learn more about IUCN at:
brainly.com/question/11911576
#SPJ4
What are 2 reasons plastic straws should be banned
Answer: plastic straws harm the enviornment and are very hard to decompose
Explanation:
How does Mayor Harlin propose to use the emergency funds to provide relief in Seattle?
The speech was delivered by Chief Seattle, a public leader. Also, he was the chief of the native American (Red Indian) Suquamish and Duwamish tribes.
The speech was a response to the treaty of the American Government for buying the land of native Americans. The speech throws light on the carelessness of the White people towards the environment. Moreover.
It focuses on the degradation of ecological balance and a plea to protect nature American. The speech is thus, acclaimed with high esteem. Let us study Chief Seattle’s Speech Summary in detail.
Learn more about Mayor Harlin here
https://brainly.com/question/15170921
#SPJ2
Mayor Harlin plans to use the emergency funds to provide relief in Seattle by investing in public health, food security, and housing assistance programs.
During times of emergency, the government often provides funds to assist those in need. In the case of Seattle, Mayor Harlin has proposed using these funds to provide relief in several ways. Firstly, investing in public health programs to help those affected by the pandemic is a top priority. Secondly, food security is also essential, and the emergency funds will be used to provide food assistance to families in need. Lastly, the funds will be used to provide housing assistance programs for those facing housing insecurity due to the pandemic.
By investing in these programs, Mayor Harlin aims to provide essential relief to those who need it the most. The government's role is to ensure that its citizens have access to basic necessities during times of crisis, and Mayor Harlin's plan is a step towards achieving that goal.
Learn more about Emergency Fund here: https://brainly.com/question/30662508
#SPJ4