Answer:
Legal and Illegal Interview Questions:
Legal:
How many times a month were you late for work at your last job?
Did you graduate from high school?
Illegal:
Do you have any mental illnesses?
What year did you graduate from high school?
Explanation:
Employers of labor should be aware of some interview questions, which are deemed legal, and some others that may be deemed illegal to ask job candidates. For this reason, employers should be careful to ensure they play by the rules. The illegal questions are considered so because they tend to exacerbate discrimination. Examples of interview questions that are deemed illegal are questions relating to age. Others include questions about marital status and parental status. Some other illegal questions relate to citizenship status, mental illness status, religious affiliations, and race or skin color.
Public safety! Answer please
Answer:
At a high level, public safety involves protecting the public safeguarding people from crimes, disaster, and other potential dangers and threats. In the United States, public safety is the dedicated responsibility of certain government organizations and local departments.
When the father of Stephen and Chris Nuss died, the two boys, aged 15 and 12 years, began to work the family farm. While the boys were still under the age of majority, their mother, Lois, kept the books Page 727for the farm. As the boys grew older, they took more and more responsibility in running the farm. They also rented and worked additional acres of farmland. They financed these rental agreements on their own, but their mother co-signed for the arrangements. The boys also purchased additional farmland. Again, their mother helped in this purchase by co-signing. When Chris decided to leave farming, Stephen paid him $100,000, and in exchange, Chris signed over the deed to the newly purchased land. Lois was not involved in this transaction. Stephen’s farming business grew. He eventually amassed more than 1,200 acres. He and his wife, Linda, kept their own financial records and maintained their own checking account for the running of the farm. Stephen’s mother was not involved in any of this detail. However, Stephen continued to pay many of the expenses involved on the original farm, where his mother still maintained her residence. Stephen also paid the insurance, maintenance, and repair expenses on all buildings and equipment on the original farm. Because Stephen continued to farm this land, in addition to the land he had subsequently purchased, these payments were always characterized as rent. No other payments went to Stephen’s mother. When Stephen died, Linda, his widow and executor, claimed that a partnership existed and that the farm equipment on the original acreage and original acreage itself belonged to that partnership. Lois argued that no partnership between Stephen and her existed. Is Linda or Lois correct? Did a partnership exist? Explain. [See: In re Estate of Nuss, 646 N.E.2d 504 (OH).]
As a rule, the judges can and do make different decisions in cases before them by distinguishing previous cases that might have applied before’. Which law tradition does NOT belong to this principle mainly?
Answer:
For long it has been the received opinion that judges filled in the gaps left by rules by using their discretion. Positivistic jurisprudence from Austin to Hart placed strong emphasis on the part played by judges in the exercise of their discretion. "In these cases it is clear", Hart has said, "that the rule-making authority must exercise discretion, and there is no possibility of treating the question raised by the various cases as if there were one uniquely correct answer to be found, as distinct from an answer which is a reasonable compromise between many conflicting interests". A competing view was espoused by the realists who placed absolute emphasis on the discretion of judges and relegated the "rules" to an obscure position. Earlier, little attention was paid to the analysis of discretion. However, a determined effort has been made lately by Ronald Dworkin, who has cast serious doubts on the orthodox opinion and has emerged as the principal opponent of Hart. Dworkin's views have posed a sustained challenge to the positivist account and have received critical acclaim by leading jurists of the world.
Need help on 6 no retakes
Answer:
its a
Explanation:
Answer: A. The electrical force is reduced.
Which position do proponents of situational crime prevention hold in terms of criminal disposition?
A.
They accept the idea that people have criminal dispositions.
B.
They reject the idea that people have criminal dispositions.
C.
They believe that criminal dispositions are prominent in people raised in troubled homes.
D.
They believe that criminal dispositions are prominent in people raised in low-income families.
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
the others are incorrect.
Answer:
Its A
Explanation:
I took the test
Which of the following identifies how the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the women's rights movement influenced the trends shown in
the line graph?
A. Affirmative action policies applied equal pay laws to employees of state governments.
B. Affirmative action policies applied equal pay laws to employees of the federal govemment.
C. Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in all sectors of the economy
D. Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in traditionally male-dominated fields
Answer:
maybe i think option c Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in all sectors of the economy.
Which statement best describes how due process has been applied in Supreme Court rulings?
The Supreme Court has ruled defendants have a right to due process under the law and cannot be denied the right to an attorney, nor illegal evidence used against them.
Explanation:
HELP PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
What does the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act do?
It limits the data that websites aimed at children above 13 can collect.
It limits the data that children under 13 can access.
It lets children under 13 access only educational sites.
It limits the data that websites aimed at children under 13 can collect.
Answer:
I think the answer is "It limits the data that websites aimed at children's under 13 can collect."
Answer: It limits the data that websites aimed at children above 13 can access
Explanation: just did test
opening mail for someone else
Answer:
are there any more details
Explanation:
Answer:
um what does this question means
What happens when a case is reversed and remanded?
A. the respondent wins and the case is ended
B. the case is returned to the lower court for further action
C. the petitioner wins and the case is ended
Answer:
b. the case is returned to the lower court for further action
the development of fundamental rights protection in the EU
Answer:
The 1984 draft treaty establishing the European Union specified that the Union must protect the dignity of the individual and recognize for everyone falling within its jurisdiction the fundamental rights and freedoms derived from the common principles of the national constitutions and the ECHR.]
Make sure to paraphrase this. I got this from the internet.
should hate speech be regulated? (in a essay)
Answer:
simple
Explanation:
hate speech should be regulated because it has many adverse effect
1)it can cause war
2)it can cause disunity
3it can frustrate the government efforts