Answer:
rom 2000 to 2003 the percent of local police officers employed by a department with infield computer access to vehicle records increased from 67% to 78%.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
The United States is allowed to conduct random roadside breath-testing.
A. True
B. False
The United States is allowed to conduct random roadside breath testing is a false statement. Thus option B is correct.
What is breath testing?The breath alcohol test analyzes breath air to determine the level of alcohol consumed. The test involves spitting into a breathalyzer 15 minutes after consuming alcohol. The test is used to determine how much booze is required to reach a hazardous level in the blood.
Three roadside checks for intoxication. Before stopping a car, the police may do so without having reason to believe the driver is intoxicated. In fact, it is permissible for the police to stop vehicles at random & check them for intoxicated drivers.
Operator error is significantly decreased by the device and printer display which guides the user through a testing cycle.Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about breath testing, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/15232346
#SPJ2
i have no idea what im doing
The sections of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms being challenged are:
Jake Devereux - Section 12 - Treatment or punishment.Tanya Gillis - Section 10 - Arrest or detention.Alex Cortes - Section 2 - Fundamental freedoms. Stephanie Klassen - Section 14 - InterpreterDavid Korman - Section 11 - Proceedings in criminal and penal matters Baltej Singh Dhillon - Section 2 - Fundamental freedoms.Jim Keegstra - Section 2 - Fundamental freedoms.Which rights are violated?Jake Devereux's right to avoid cruel and unusual punishment is violated. Tanya's right is also violated as she should be told why she is arrested.
Alex Cortes has the right to freedom of association and this was violated by Thames Center Council.
Stephanie Klassen has the right to an interpreter if she doesn't understand a language so this is another violation. David Korman has the right to an unbiased trial so the choice of the judge shouldn't matter.
Baltej Singh Dhillon has the right to freedom of religious practice so he shouldn't be fired for wearing what his religion tells him too.
Jim Keegstra's right is not violated because laws and actions against Hate speech can supersede Section 2's fundamental rights.
Question is:
What section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is relevant and is that section being violated?
Find out more on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms at https://brainly.com/question/20329431.
#SPJ1
The Federal Trade Commission and the Security and Exchange Commission are examples of executive departments.
Select one:
True
False
Answer:
false
Explanation: if it wrong sorry
Paragraph #1
In this paragraph, restate what rights you get according to the 4th amendment. Then, write your thesis statement. Your thesis should restate the question and pick a side - either Yes, the government did violate the 4th amendment or No, the government did not violate the 4th amendment.
STUDENT ANSWER:
Paragraph #2
In this paragraph we are going to use the evidence to support your thesis. Use two pieces of evidence from the document analysis work from Thursday to support your thesis.
Evidence #1, and why it supports your thesis:
Evidence #2, and why it supports your thesis:
Paragraph #3
In this paragraph, restate your evidence and your thesis as your conclusion.
The 4th amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
What rights do you get according to the 4th amendment?The Fourth Amendment provides protection to the people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment protects people from searches that are deemed unreasonable under the law.
So we can conclude that the 4th amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
Learn more about amendment here: https://brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ1
6. Do you see a conflict between Fourth Amendment rights and the work of law enforcement? Why or why not?
Answer:
Explanation:
THE CONSTITUTION, THROUGH THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, PROTECTS PEOPLE FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES BY THE GOVERNMENT. THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, HOWEVER US NOT A GUARANTEE AGANIST ALL SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, BUT THOSE THAT ARE DEEMED UNREASONABLE UNDER THE LAW.
Question 4 of 10
How does creating a charitable remainder trust help family members
financially?
A. It creates a yearly tax-free income.
B. It manages assets not easily divided among beneficiaries.
C. It protects assets from the family's debtors.
D. It lowers taxes owed on assets received from the trust.
SUBMIT
Answer: By donating the assets in-kind to the CRT, you'll preserve the full fair market value of the assets rather than reduce it by large capital gains taxes, allowing more money for the income and charitable beneficiaries.
Explanation:
Answer:
D. It lowers taxes owned on assets received from the trust.
Explanation:
I have taken the test and can confirm this to be the answer.
Explain whether the prosecution has met the burden of proof.
Ann is on trial for first-degree murder. The only key piece of evidence in Ann’s trial is the murder weapon, which was discovered in Ann’s dresser drawer during a law enforcement search. Before Ann’s trial, the defense makes a motion to suppress the murder weapon evidence because the search warrant in Ann’s case was signed by a judge who was inebriated and mentally incompetent. The defense is successful with this motion, and the judge rules that the murder weapon is inadmissible at trial. The prosecution decides to proceed anyway.
Due to the defense's request to suppress, the court found the murder weapon inadmissible, removing the prosecution's burden of proof.
What is the burden of proof.?Generally, The prosecution has not met the burden of proof in this case because the key piece of evidence, the murder weapon, has been ruled inadmissible by the judge due to the motion to suppress filed by the defense.
Without this key piece of evidence, the prosecution will likely have a difficult time proving Ann's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The fact that the prosecution is proceeding anyway may indicate that they do not have enough evidence to prove their case without the weapon.
Read more about the burden of proof.
https://brainly.com/question/15700657
#SPJ1
Which was a result of the interaction between European Settlers and Native Americans?
The result of the interaction between European settlers and Native Americans was Native Americans were continually pushed westward onto the poorest lands for hunting and farming.
What happened when the Natives met the Europeans?The Europeans were militarily superior and so defeated the Natives on several occasions.
This allowed them to push the Natives westward to areas that were not very conducive for survival.
Find out more on Native American - European interaction at https://brainly.com/question/13393911
#SPJ1
Penalties for your first DUI conviction include _____.
A. Up to one year of probation
B. A fine of up to $4,000
C. 500 Hours of Community Service
D. A One-year License Revocation
The exclusions laws prohibit immigration from __
Answer:
China & Japan.
Explanation:
Beginning with the Chinese Exclusion Act (passed by law in 1882), the exclusion laws prohibited Chinese immigrants to not be allowed in the U.S.
Another immigration act in 1924, excluded all Asian immigrants including from Japan.
How to forget someone that you love?
Answer:
It's impossible to forget someone you love truly.
Explanation:
i also faced this problem but i can't still forgot her.
(╯︵╰,) i tried all thing i ignore her i dont talk to her.
but still i remember her.
she is so amazing. i cant forgot her in my whole life.
You can try to ignore her if you not truly love him.
Just yourself busy .
have a wonderful day.
A plastic card that is an electronic method of payment where the funds are deducted directly from the card owner's bank account.
Answer:
Automated teller machine card or credit card.
Professor Jones had a 2015 Chevy Volt and he insured it with Nationwide Insurance. He wanted to purchase a Tesla and decided to sell his Volt to Professor Smith. Professor Smith bought the Volt for $5000. Professor Jones never cancelled the insurance on the Volt. Professor Smith was on his way to Valencia to his Business Law I class and was reared end by a student. The car was totaled. Professor Jones contacted his insurance company and demanded that the insurance company pay him on his claim for the damage to the Volt. Using IRAC will Professor Jones be successful.
Professor Jones will not be successful in the application of insurance claim by use of IRAC.
What is the meaning of IRAC?This refers to an acronym that stands for Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion.
This term functions as a methodology for legal analysis, that is, it is a method mostly used in hypothetical questions in law school and bar exams.
In practice, the use of IRAC are used in connection to law school and bar exams, and not in application of insurance claim.
Read more about insurance claim
brainly.com/question/26285319
#SPJ1
Use the rules of inference and replacement to construct a proof..
philosophy: college
One way to protect yourself from becoming a victim is ...
Answer:
Be aware of your surroundings.
Explanation:
Being aware of one's surroundings is a very important way to protect one from becoming a victim.
Some other ways are:
Don't share your passwords with anyone.Be confident and focused.Let your close ones know when your are going out of town.Don't open doors easily for strangers.Hope it helps!
Have a nice day:)
What is NOT a way to lower your risk of drowsy driving?
The state court systems are most often structured in what way: locally or centrally?
Only State's and local jurisdiction's food safety requirements are important to
follow
There appear to be no major fundamental differences between state and federal food safety laws, although some state laws are based on the 1906 Pure Food and Drugs Act and others on the 1938 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Insurance that will pay for injury to another driver and/or damage to their car if you are in an accident is called...
When insurance pays for injury to another driver and the damage to their car if you cause an accident, this is Liability Insurance.
What is liability insurance?This is a type of insurance that covers you and people involved in accidents if you are the cause of that accident.
Premiums for such plans are generally higher as they involve paying out for more than one person when claimed.
Find out more on liability insurance at https://brainly.com/question/11464345
#SPJ1
Are there ever "limit cases" where civil disobedience might be an ineffective or otherwise insufficient response to an unjust law? Why or why not? (philosophy)
Yes there are limit cases to situations where civil disobedience may be an ineffective response to unjust laws.
What is civil disobedience?This is a term that is used to refer to political protests. It is the type of disobedience that citizens may decide to carry out when they refuse to obey the laws that they have seen to be unjust and also unfair in the country that they live in.
This type of protest is usually non violent. Yes it could be ineffective if the citizens are in an authoritarian setting. Civil disobedience in such cases may lead to some ugly consequences for the protesters.
This only gets to be effective in a real democratic setting where the government is ready to listen to the people and make changes where necessary.
Read more on civil disobedience here:
https://brainly.com/question/22982846
#SPJ1
Tenants rights are within the purview of state and federal law.
a. False
b. True
Answer: true
Explanation:
You purchase a used car from a car dealership in order to move cross-country to go to college with everything that you own, including a tuba, a large iguana and its terrarium, and about twenty-five large boxes of personal items. The dealer promises that the car, a 1973 Ford Pinto, can do the job. You purchase the car and the dealership signs over the title to you. Once you get it home, you realize that not only is it way too small for your things, it is not fit for driving. Which warranties did the seller breach?
a. both the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and the warranty of merchantability
b. only the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
c. only the warranty of fitness
d. both the warranty of merchantability and the warranty of fitness
Answer:
a. both the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and the warranty of merchantability
Explanation:
since the seller assured the buyer that it would work, he breached both warranties.
Drivers safety
Age 17 and convicted
False. A mandatory PennDOT hearing will be announced to you. Your license will be automatically suspended for 60 days if you fail to appear at the hearing.
Can Pennsylvanians who speed face jail time?A speeding offense may result in a "reckless driving" conviction, depending on the situation. A "summary offense" is a typical first conviction for careless driving. A violation carries a maximum sentence of 90 days in jail, a $200 fine, and a six-month license suspension.
What is the Pennsylvania crime speed?speeding by 31 mph over the limit.You have been charged with excessive speeding if the police claim that you exceeded the speed limit by at least 31 MPH. A mandatory PennDOT hearing will be announced to you.
To know more about Driver License visit:
https://brainly.com/question/6755539
#SPJ1
I need the anwsers for module 5 DBA flvs civics please!!!
Answer: have you checked quizlet.. they have like flashcards for specific modules and class.. its helped me alot before trust
Explanation:
Crum Brothers Corp., a steel drum manufacturer, owned and operated a manufacturing plant in Pittsburg, Penn.. Coel Stone, the plant superintendent, hired Pitt Security Patrol, Inc. (PSP), a security company, to guard CBC property and deter thieves and vandals. Some PSP security guards, as Stone knew, carried firearms. Craig Sharp, a PSP security guard, was not certified as an armed guard but nevertheless took his gun, in a briefcase, to work. While working at the CBC plant Craig fired his gun at Don Stew, a CBC employee, in the belief that Stew was an intruder. The bullet struck and killed Stew. Stew's mother filed a suit in court against CBC and others, alleging in part that her son's death was the result of PSP's negligence, for which CBC was responsible.
PLEASE USE ISSUE, RULE, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION. I NEED THIS ANSWER FAST, THANK YOU!
Using the Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion, see the analysis of the legal case indicated above.
What is the Issue?As already given, Additional security officers were engaged to defend the steel mill from thieves and vandals, as previously stated. CBC management was also aware that the security guards possessed weapons, which they were meant to employ for CBC protection.
The primary goal of recruiting more guards was to defend CBC from external threats.
What was the rule?The responsibility for confirming that the hired guards were:
trained for the circumstance and were legally permitted to carry and use weapons in a crisis situation like this;was that of CBC
Both PSP and CBC were entirely negligent in failing to check and regulate the scenario in which a security guard who was not qualified as an armed guard nonetheless carried the pistol.
What is the Analysis?Unauthorized employees carrying firearms are automatically breaking the law and endangering their own and others' safety.
Also, once CBC discovered that guards were armed with weapons, it was their job to ensure that sufficient training is provided to their personnel and that they are familiar with the entire procedure so that they may prevent any confusion and are not perceived as a thief or a risk to others.
What is the conclusion?Working in an atmosphere prone to theft and vandalism necessitated more security and armed guards, which was an inherently risky circumstance, especially when uncertified guards were deployed with guns.
However, both parties (PSP and CBC) were negligent.
Learn more about Legal case analysis at:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ1
Why is absolute freedom optimal for an individual and yet detrimental
to a society?
Absolute freedom, where an individual is free to do whatever they want without any constraints or restrictions, can be optimal for the individual in the sense that they can fully express themselves and make their own choices without interference. However, this type of freedom can be detrimental to a society as a whole because it can lead to chaos and social disorder.
When individuals have absolute freedom, they may not take into account the well-being or rights of others. This can lead to individuals acting in ways that harm others or the community, such as engaging in criminal activities, disrupting public order, or neglecting their responsibilities. This can result in a society that is unsafe, unstable, and unsustainable in the long run.
In addition, absolute freedom can also lead to social inequality, as those who have more resources or power will be able to take advantage of the lack of constraints to further their own interests, to the detriment of others.
Therefore, societies often establish laws, regulations, and other forms of social constraints to balance the individual's freedom with the need for social order and fairness. This is often referred to as "ordered liberty," where individuals are free to pursue their own goals within the limits of the law and respect for the rights of others.
In summary, while absolute freedom may be optimal for an individual, it can be detrimental to a society as a whole because it can lead to chaos, social disorder, and inequality. A balance is needed between individual freedom and societal constraints in order to maintain order, fairness, and the general well-being of society.
Which of the following is NOT a reason why parking lots can be more dangerous than the open road?
The space is enclosed
Vehicles are traveling at high speeds
Blind spots are everywhere
Pedestrians can be walking anywhere
Answer:
vehicles are traveling at high speeds
Explanation:
I just answered the question and got it right. Plus the rest are true.
The correct option is B. Vehicles traveling at high speeds are not a reason why parking lots can be more dangerous than the open road. When approaching the driver's door from the front of the car while facing oncoming traffic if the car is parked at the curb, drivers will be more aware of the oncoming traffic. Drivers should inspect the area around the vehicle's outside before getting inside.
Why driving slow is dangerous?Traffic is disrupted by slow drivers. They may be inexperienced and new, or they may be frequent distracted driving offenders. Everyone on the road may experience issues as a result of this.
If a car is passing you, you should slow down a bit so that it may pass safely. Never increase your speed while another car is trying to pass you; this is not a considerate or nice way to share the road, and it is also quite dangerous on a two-lane road.
Learn more about Parking lots here:
https://brainly.com/question/11999935
#SPJ2
2. How can the thermal imager be used to help identify if marijuana is being grown in a house?
A thermal imager can identify if marijuana is being grown in a house bt focusing on high-intensity halide lamps used to grown them.
What is a Metal-halide lamps?These are lighting lamps that are used for general lighting purposes both indoors and outdoors, but are used as source of light for growing plant as well.'
Hence, thermal imager can help to identify if marijuana is being grown in a house by detecting the infrared rays radiating from the lamps by scanning the roofs and walls of the home.
Read more about thermal imager
brainly.com/question/10501228
#SPJ1
what drug has an increased risk of over dose when taken with alcohol
Answer: opioids
Explanation:
opioid painkillers, Heroin, Vicodin, Fentanyl, Percocet, depressants
20 points for the question
The accurate statement about the European population in America is European Americans make up the largest population segment today.
How much of Americans are of European descent?currently, about 58% of Americans are considered to be of European descent.
this means that the largest portion of Americans are of European descent but this percentage is on the decline.
find out more on European Americans at https://brainly.com/question/25012837.
#spj1