Solving inequalities( need help checking my answer)

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

1+1

2

2 ones equals 2 in total.

You can also use a calculator to input:

1

+

1

press equal

and it should give you 2.

Hope this helps :)

Simplifying the logarithmic expressions:

a. log(12) + 10 log(5)

Using the product rule of logarithms: log(a) + log(b) = log(a * b)

[tex]= log(12 * (5)^10)[/tex]

= log(12 * 9765625)The simplified expression is log(117187500).

b. log(400) - log(80)

Using the quotient rule of logarithms: log(a) - log(b) = log(a / b)

= log(400 / 80)

= log(5)

The simplified expression is log(5).c. 5 log(0.2) + log(3) - log(6)

Using the power rule of logarithms: [tex]log(a^n) = n * log(a)[/tex]

= [tex]log(0.2^5) + log(3) - log(6)= log(0.00032) + log(3) - log(6)[/tex]

The simplified expression is log(0.00032) + log(3) - log(6).

Evaluating the logarithmic expressions:

a. log(625)

Using the change of base formula: log(a, b) = log(c, b) / log(c, a)

= log(10, 625) / log(10, 10)

= log(625) / 1

The simplified expression is log(625).

b. 10 log(4) + log(12)

Using the change of base formula: log(a, b) = log(c, b) / log(c, a)= 10 log(4) + log(12) / log(10)

= 10 log(4) + log(12)

The simplified expression is 10 log(4) + log(12).

c. 10 log(9)Using the change of base formula: log(a, b) = log(c, b) / log(c, a)

= log(10, 9) / log(10, 10)

= log(9) / 1

The simplified expression is log(9).

Learn more about logarithmic here:

https://brainly.com/question/12049968

#SPJ11

To find the value of angle h in the given decagon, we can use the fact that the sum of all the interior angles of a decagon is equal to (n - 2) * 180 degrees, where n is the number of sides of the polygon.

In this case, a decagon has 10 sides, so the sum of its interior angles is (10 - 2) * 180 = 8 * 180 = 1440 degrees.

To find angle h, we subtract the sum of the known angles from the total sum of the interior angles:

h = 1440 - (150 + 140 + 150 + 160 + 165 + 170 + 115 + 130 + 140)

h = 1440 - 1370

h = 70

Therefore, the value of angle h in the given decagon is 70 degrees.

The consequence of violating the assumption of Sphericity can be significant. It reduces statistical power, effects the distribution of the F-statistic, and raises the rate of Type I errors in post hocs.

Sphericity refers to the homogeneity of variances between all possible pairs of groups in a repeated-measures design. When this assumption is violated, it can result in a distorted F-statistic, which in turn affects the results of post hoc tests.
The correct answer to the question is c. It reduces statistical power, effects the distribution of the F-statistic, and raises the rate of Type I errors in post hocs. This means that violating the assumption of Sphericity leads to a decreased ability to detect true effects, an inaccurate representation of the true distribution of the F-statistic, and an increased likelihood of falsely identifying significant results.
According to statistics, the consequence of violating the assumption of Sphericity is not a rare occurrence. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that the assumptions of your statistical analysis are met before interpreting your results to avoid false conclusions.
In conclusion, violating the assumption of Sphericity can have severe consequences that affect the validity of your research results. Therefore, it is crucial to understand this assumption and check for its violation to ensure the accuracy and reliability of your statistical analysis.

To know more about statistic visit :

https://brainly.com/question/18851162

#SPJ11

The answer is , the number that must be one of the two primes for any counterexample to the conditional statement "If any two numbers are prime, then their product is odd" is 2.

A counterexample is an example that shows that a universal or conditional statement is false. In the given statement, it is necessary to prove that there is at least one example where both numbers are prime, but the product of both numbers is not odd.

Let us take an example where both numbers are prime numbers, but their product is not an odd number. We can use the prime numbers 2 and 2. If we multiply these numbers, we get 4, which is not an odd number. In summary, 2 must be one of the two primes for any counterexample to the conditional statement "If any two numbers are prime, then their product is odd".

To know more about Prime number visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18845305

#SPJ11

(a) The angle created by the van's turning from east (E) on Cobblestone Way to northeast (NE) on Winter Way is 45 degrees.

(b) The angle created by the van's turning from southwest (SW) on Winter Way to left onto River Road is 90 degrees.

(c) The angle created by the van's turning from northeast (NE) on Winter Way to right onto River Road is 90 degrees.

(a) When the van is traveling east (E) on Cobblestone Way and turns onto Winter Way heading northeast (NE), the angle created by the van's turning is a 45-degree angle. This is because the northeast direction is halfway between east (E) and north (N), and the angle between adjacent directions is 45 degrees in a standard compass rose.

(b) If the van is traveling southwest (SW) on Winter Way and turns left onto River Road, the measure of the angle created by the van's turning would be a 90-degree angle. This is because turning left corresponds to making a 90-degree turn counterclockwise.

(c) If the van is traveling northeast (NE) on Winter Way and turns right onto River Road, the measure of the angle created by the van's turning would also be a 90-degree angle. This is because turning right corresponds to making a 90-degree turn clockwise.

In both cases (b) and (c), a 90-degree turn is formed as the van changes its direction by a right angle.

To know more about angles , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28894360

#SPJ11

Answer:

$5.23

Step-by-step explanation:

Another way to write the tax rate is 7.75% or as a decimal 0.0775.

So 4.85 x .0775 = 0.375875 ===>>> that's the amt of tax you'll pay. Now add that to the cost of the ticket.

4.85 + 0.375875 = 5.225875 which rounds to approx $5.23.

The polar curve r = 6 - 6sinθ has a vertical tangent line at the point (r, θ) = (0, π/2), which corresponds to the polar coordinate where the radius is zero and the angle is π/2.

To find the points where the polar curve has a vertical tangent line, we need to determine the values of θ at which the slope of the curve becomes undefined. In polar coordinates, the slope of the curve at a point can be calculated using the derivative with respect to θ, which is given by:

dr/dθ = (dr/dt) / (dθ/dt)

Here, r represents the radius and θ represents the angle. The derivative dr/dt represents the rate of change of r with respect to time, while dθ/dt represents the rate of change of θ with respect to time. Since we are interested in the slope with respect to θ, we can rewrite the equation as:

dy/dx = (dr/dθ) / (rdθ/dθ)

Simplifying further, we get:

dy/dx = (dr/dθ) / (r)

In our case, the given equation is r = 6 - 6sinθ. To calculate the derivative dr/dθ, we differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to θ:

d(r)/dθ = d(6 - 6sinθ)/dθ

Simplifying, we get:

d(r)/dθ = -6cosθ

Now, substituting this into our equation for dy/dx, we have:

dy/dx = (-6cosθ) / (6 - 6sinθ)

To find the points where the slope becomes undefined (i.e., vertical tangent lines), we need to set the denominator equal to zero:

6 - 6sinθ = 0

Solving for θ, we get:

sinθ = 1

Since the range of θ is defined as 0 ≤ θ < 2π, we can conclude that there is only one solution for sinθ = 1 within this range, which is when θ = π/2.

To know more about tangent line here

https://brainly.com/question/32190844

#SPJ4

A) The expected value of X is 3.93.

B) The probability of at most two successes in six independent Bernoulli trials with p = 0.4 is 0.626.

C) The standard deviation of X is 0.89.

A. The expected value of a random variable is the sum of the products of each possible outcome and its probability. In the given probability distribution, we have four possible outcomes: 2, 4, 6, and 8, with respective probabilities of 5/58, 20/58, 13/58, and 20/58. We can calculate the expected value of X using the formula:

E(X) = Σ(xi * P(X = xi)), where xi represents each possible outcome.

Therefore, E(X) = (2 * 5/58) + (4 * 20/58) + (6 * 13/58) + (8 * 20/58) = 3.93

B. In Bernoulli trials, we have two possible outcomes, success or failure, with respective probabilities of p and q = 1 - p. The probability of at most two successes in six independent Bernoulli trials with p = 0.4 can be calculated using the binomial distribution formula:

P(X ≤ 2) = Σ(i=0 to 2) (6Ci * 0.4i * 0.6(6-i)), where Ci represents the combination of selecting i items from a set of six.

Therefore, P(X ≤ 2) = (6C0 * 0.40 * 0.62) + (6C1 * 0.41 * 0.61) + (6C2 * 0.42 * 0.60) = 0.626

C. The standard deviation of a probability distribution is a measure of how much the outcomes deviate from the expected value. It is calculated using the formula:

σ = √(Σ(xi - μ)2 * P(X = xi)), where μ represents the expected value.

In the given probability distribution, we have four possible outcomes with respective probabilities and deviations from the expected value:

xi 0 1 2 3

P(X=xi) 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.2

(xi - μ)2 3.24 1.44 0.04 1.44

Using the above values, we can calculate the standard deviation of X as follows:

σ = √((3.24 * 0.1) + (1.44 * 0.1) + (0.04 * 0.6) + (1.44 * 0.2)) = 0.89

To know more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

The total number of different types of jeans available is 30. The correct answer is e. 30.

Since each design can be made with either short or long length, and there are 3 designs in total, there are 2 options for length for each design.

Additionally, there are 5 color patterns available for each design and length combination.

Therefore, the total number of different types of jeans available can be calculated as follows:

2 (options for length) x 3 (designs) x 5 (color patterns) = 30.

Therefore, there are 30 different types of jeans offered in all.

Hence, the correct answer is an option (e).

Learn more about permutation here:

brainly.com/question/1216161

#SPJ1

The solution of the compound inequality is 4 ≤ x ≤ 6.

The solution of the compound inequality is calculated as follows;

The given inequality equation;

2 + x ≤ 3x – 6 ≤ 12

Break down the compound inequality into two equations as;

2 + x ≤ 3x – 6

add 6 to both sides of the equation;

2 + 6 + x ≤ 3x

8 + x ≤ 3x

Subtract x from both sides of the equation;

8 ≤ 2x

4 ≤ x

Another solution of the inequality is determined as;

3x – 6 ≤ 12

3x ≤ 12 + 6

3x ≤ 18

x ≤ 18/3

x ≤ 6

The solution = 4 ≤ x ≤ 6

Learn more about compound inequality here: https://brainly.com/question/28597739

#SPJ1

The complete question is below:

Which best describes the solution set of the compound inequality below?

2 + x ≤ 3x – 6 ≤ 12

a: 4 ≤ x ≤ 9

b: 4 ≤ x ≤ 6

c: –2 ≤ x ≤ 2

d: –2 ≤ x ≤ 3

Answer:

To solve the problem, we can use the formula:

Total swim time = (time swimming downstream) + (time swimming upstream)

Let's call the speed of the river's current "c". When swimming downstream, the participant's effective speed is 2 + c miles per hour. When swimming upstream, the effective speed is 2 - c miles per hour.

Using the formula above and plugging in the given values, we get:

1.25 = (1.2 / (2 + c)) + (1.2 / (2 - c))

Simplifying this equation requires some algebraic manipulation, but we can eventually arrive at:

c^2 - 1.44 = 0

Solving for c gives us:

c = ±1.2

Since the participant is swimming both downstream and upstream, we know that the current must be flowing in one direction only. Therefore, we take only the positive solution:

The river's current is 1.2 miles per hour.

The measure of angle m∠VRX in the cyclic quadrilateral is equal to 71°

The sum of the opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral is equal to 180°, so we solve for the angle m∠VRX of the quadrilateral WXRV as follows:

53x + 3 + 36x - 2 = 180°

89x + 2 = 180°

89x = 180° - 2 {collect like terms}

89x = 178°

x = 178°/89 {divide through by 89}

x = 2

m∠VRX = 36(2) - 2

m∠VRX = 71°

Therefore, the measure of angle m∠VRX in the cyclic quadrilateral is equal to 71°

Read more about quadrilateral here:https://brainly.com/question/9172423

#SPJ1

The answer is 7.99996224.

To find the area of the region described, we first need to determine the points of intersection between the three equations. The first two equations intersect when 8,192 √x = 128x^2. Simplifying this equation, we get x = 1/64. Plugging this value back into the equation y = 8,192 √x, we get y = 8.
The second and third equations intersect when 128x^2 = y = 8,192 √x. Simplifying this equation, we get x = 1/512. Plugging this value back into the equation y = 128x^2, we get y = 1.
Therefore, the region described is bounded by the lines y = 8, y = 8,192 √x, and y = 128x^2. To find the area of this region, we need to integrate the difference between the two functions that bound the region, which is (8,192 √x) - (128x^2), with respect to x from 1/512 to 1/64.
Evaluating this integral gives us the exact area of the region, which is 7.99996224 square units. Therefore, the answer is 7.99996224.

To know more about Points of Intersection visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14217061
#SPJ11

The statement "Bash is inherently incapable of floating-point arithmetic, which is why external utilities are utilized." is true.

Bash, as a shell scripting language, primarily deals with integer arithmetic and string manipulation. It does not have built-in support for floating-point arithmetic, making it difficult to perform calculations with decimal numbers. To overcome this limitation, external utilities like 'bc' (Basic Calculator) or 'awk' are often used.

These utilities provide a more versatile way to perform mathematical operations involving floating-point numbers. By utilizing these external tools, Bash scripts can be enhanced to include more complex calculations and data manipulation, expanding their capabilities beyond simple integer operations.

To know more about shell scripting click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29625476#

#SPJ11

Let's assume the price of commodity B is "x". Then, according to the given information, the price of commodity A would be 20% more than "x", which is equal to 1.2x. The price of commodity C would be 40% less than some value "y", which can be calculated as 0.6y.

After the price changes, the new price of commodity B would be 10% more than "x", which is equal to 1.1x. The new price of commodity C would be 10% less than "y", which is equal to 0.9y.

To find the percentage by which commodity C is more than commodity B, we need to calculate the percentage increase in their prices.

The new price of commodity B is 1.1x, which is 10% more than x. Therefore, the percentage increase in the price of commodity B is:

(1.1x - x)/x x 100% = 10%

The new price of commodity C is 0.9y, which is 10% less than y. Therefore, the percentage decrease in the price of commodity C is:

(y - 0.9y)/y x 100% = 10%

We can simplify this expression to:

0.1/0.9 x 100% = 11.11%

Therefore, commodity C is approximately 11.11% more expensive than commodity B after the price changes.

To learn more about price click here : brainly.com/question/3140974

#SPJ11

The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) is f(t) = (1 / ([tex]e^{\pi }[/tex] + 1)²) * h(t - π/2) + (1 / ([tex]e^{-\pi }[/tex]+ 1)²) * h(t + π/2) + (1 / 10) *[tex]e^{-2t}[/tex] .

To find the inverse Laplace transform of F(s), we need to first rewrite F(s) in a suitable form.

F(s) = 1 / ([tex]e^{2s}[/tex] * (1 + [tex]e^{-2s}[/tex])² * (s + 2))

Now, we use partial fraction decomposition to write F(s) as a sum of simpler fractions:

F(s) = A / ([tex]e^{2s}[/tex]) + B / (1 + [tex]e^{2s}[/tex]) + C / (1 + [tex]e^{-2s}[/tex]) + D / (s + 2)

To find the values of A, B, C, and D, we can multiply both sides of the equation by the denominators of each fraction and then evaluate the resulting expression at appropriate values of s. This gives us

A = lim(s -> ∞) s * F(s) = 0

B = F(jπ/2) = 1 / ([tex]e^{\pi }[/tex]+ 1)²

C = F(-jπ/2) = 1 / ([tex]e^{-\pi }[/tex] + 1)²

D = F(-2) = 1 / 10

Now, we can use the inverse Laplace transform formulas to find the inverse Laplace transform of each term:

L⁻¹{A / [tex]e^{2s}[/tex]} = A * δ(t)

L⁻¹ {B / (1 + [tex]e^{2s}[/tex]} = B * h(t - π/2)

L⁻¹ {C / (1 + [tex]e^{-2s}[/tex]} = C * h(t + π/2)

L⁻¹ {D / (s + 2)} = D *[tex]e^{-2t}[/tex]

Therefore, the inverse Laplace transform is

f(t) = A * δ(t) + B * h(t - π/2) + C * h(t + π/2) + D * [tex]e^{-2t}[/tex]

Substituting the values of A, B, C, and D, we get

f(t) = (1 / ([tex]e^{\pi }[/tex] + 1)²) * h(t - π/2) + (1 / ([tex]e^{-\pi }[/tex]+ 1)²) * h(t + π/2) + (1 / 10) *[tex]e^{-2t}[/tex]

To know more about inverse Laplace transform:

https://brainly.com/question/31322563

#SPJ4

An 80% confidence interval for the population mean H is (42.56, 47.68).

Part 1:

The formula for a confidence interval for the population mean is:

CI = x ± z*(σ/√n)

where x is the sample mean, σ is the population standard deviation, n is the sample size, and z is the critical value from the standard normal distribution corresponding to the desired confidence level.

For an 80% confidence interval, the z-value is 1.28 (obtained from a standard normal distribution table). Plugging in the values, we get:

CI = 45.12 ± 1.28*(8.9/√50) = (42.56, 47.68)

Therefore, an 80% confidence interval for the population mean H is (42.56, 47.68).

To know more about confidence interval refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

The antiderivative of the original expression, with a constant of integration c is (1/7) * e^(7x-1) / (-6(7x)^6) + c

We want to compute the antiderivative of the expression 7ex − 1 / (7x)7 dx. To do so, we can use the formula for integration by substitution, which states that if we have an integrand of the form f(g(x))g'(x), we can substitute u = g(x) and rewrite the integral in terms of u and du/dx. This allows us to simplify the integral and hopefully make it easier to solve.

So let's apply this formula to the given expression. We notice that we have an exponential function, which suggests that we should try to let u be the exponent. Specifically, we can let u = 7x, so that we have:

u = 7x

du/dx = 7

dx = du/7

Now, we can substitute these expressions for u and dx into the integral:

∫ 7ex−1 / (7x)7 dx

= ∫ 7eu−1 / (7u/7)7 * (du/7) (using the substitutions above)

= (1/7) ∫ e^(u-1)/u^7 du

We can simplify the integral a bit further by using the formula for the antiderivative of e^x, which is simply e^x + c. In this case, we have e^(u-1) in the integrand, so we can write:

(1/7) ∫ e^(u-1)/u^7 du

= (1/7) * e^(u-1) / (-6u^6) + c

Now we can substitute back in our original variable, x, to obtain the final antiderivative:

= (1/7) * e^(7x-1) / (-6(7x)^6) + c

And that's it! This is the antiderivative of the original expression, with a constant of integration c.

Learn more about antiderivative

brainly.com/question/31396969

#SPJ11

The statement you made is not entirely correct. The Second Shape Theorem, also known as the Second Derivative Test, does not include the converse of the First Shape Theorem. Instead, it provides additional information about the nature of critical points of a function.

The Second Shape Theorem states that if a function f(x) has a critical point at x = a (i.e., f'(a) = 0), and if f''(a) exists and is nonzero, then the function has a local minimum at x = a if f''(a) > 0, and a local maximum at x = a if f''(a) < 0.

Note that this theorem only applies to critical points where f'(a) = 0. There may be other critical points where f'(a) does not equal zero, and these points do not satisfy the conditions of the Second Shape Theorem.

In contrast, the converse of the First Shape Theorem states that if a function is differentiable at a point x = a and f'(a) = 0, then f has an extreme value at x = a. This is a separate theorem that is not directly related to the Second Shape Theorem.

for such more question on  First Shape Theorem.

https://brainly.com/question/30329627

#SPJ11

The Second Shape Theorem states that if a function f(x) has an extreme value at x=a, then the function must also be differentiable at x=a. This theorem is the converse of the First Shape Theorem, which states that if a function is differentiable at a point, then it must have a local extreme value at that point.

Essentially, the Second Shape Theorem tells us that having an extreme value at a point is a necessary condition for differentiability at that point. This theorem is particularly useful in calculus and optimization problems, where we are interested in finding the maximum or minimum values of a function. By checking for extreme values and differentiability at those points, we can determine if a function has a local maximum or minimum.

Your statement, "If f(x) has an extreme value at x=a, then f is differentiable at x=a," is actually the converse of the First Shape Theorem. However, this statement is not universally true, as extreme values can occur at non-differentiable points (e.g., sharp corners or endpoints). The Second Shape Theorem does not include the converse of the First Shape Theorem, but rather provides another method for identifying extreme values by analyzing the second derivative.

Learn more about theorem here : brainly.com/question/30066983

#SPJ11

The amount for polishing the triangular tiles at rate of 75 paise cm² is 3306 rupees.

Given data ,

To calculate the area of each triangular tile, we can use Heron's formula, which is based on the lengths of the triangle's sides.

Heron's formula states that for a triangle with side lengths a, b, and c, the area (A) can be calculated as:

A = √(s(s - a)(s - b)(s - c))

where s is the semi perimeter of the triangle given by:

s = (a + b + c) / 2

In this case, the sides of each triangular tile are 9 cm, 28 cm, and 35 cm.

Calculating the semi perimeter:

s = (9 + 28 + 35) / 2

s = 72 / 2

s = 36 cm

Calculating the area using Heron's formula:

A = √(36(36 - 9)(36 - 28)(36 - 35))

A = √(36 * 27 * 8 * 1)

A = √(7776)

A ≈ 88.18 cm²

Since there are 50 triangular tiles, the total area of the floor is approximately ,

50 x 88.18 = 4409 cm².

To calculate the cost of polishing the tiles at a rate of 75 paise (0.75 rupees) per cm², we multiply the total area by the rate:

Cost = 4408 cm² x 0.75 rupees/cm²

Cost ≈ 3306 rupees

Hence , the rough estimate for polishing the tiles would be 3306 rupees

Learn more about Heron's formula,

brainly.com/question/29184159

#SPJ4

(a) To determine the null and alternative hypotheses, we have:

H0: μ = $243,780 (The mean price of an existing single-family home is $243,780)
H1: μ < $243,780 (The mean price of an existing single-family home is less than $243,780)

Hypotheses refer to statements or assumptions that are made as a basis for reasoning or for the formulation of mathematical theories, conjectures, or proofs. Hypotheses are often stated before a mathematical investigation or analysis and serve as starting points or assumptions to be tested or proven.

(b) A Type I error is when we reject the null hypothesis when it is true. So, the correct option is: A.

The broker rejects the hypothesis that the mean price is $243,780 when it is the true mean cost.

The null hypothesis (H₀) is a statement or assumption that suggests there is no significant difference, relationship, or effect between variables or populations.

(c) A Type II error is when we fail to reject the null hypothesis when it is false. So, the correct option is: C.

The broker fails to reject the hypothesis that the mean price is $243,780, when the true mean price is less than $243,780.

The null hypothesis typically represents the status quo or the absence of an effect. It is often formulated as an equality statement, stating that two populations are equal or that a parameter has a specific value.

To know more about null hypothesis refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252?#

#SPJ11

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

7/8 is the same as 7 times one eighth or 7 divided by 8

The sales tax for the pair of jeans is $1.47.

We are given that;

Cost=$24.50

Percentage=6%

Now,

Step 1: Convert the sales tax rate to a decimal

6% = 6/100 = 0.06

Step 2: Multiply the cost of the jeans by the sales tax rate

24.50 x 0.06 = 1.47

Step 3: Round the sales tax amount to the nearest cent

1.47 is already rounded to the nearest cent

Therefore, by the percentage the answer will be $1.47.

Learn more about percent here:

https://brainly.com/question/11549320

#SPJ1

The point (180, -19) is on the terminal side of the angle θ, the exact values of the trigonometric functions are sin(θ) = -19/181, cos(θ) = 180/181, and tan(θ) = -19/180.

Since the point (180, -19) is on the terminal side of the angle θ, we can calculate the trigonometric functions using the coordinates.
First, find the distance from the origin to the point (180, -19). This distance will represent the hypotenuse (r) of the right triangle formed by the terminal side. Use the Pythagorean theorem:
r = √(x^2 + y^2) = √(180^2 + (-19)^2) = √(32400 + 361) = √(32761) = 181
Now that we have the hypotenuse (r), we can find the exact values of the trigonometric functions for the angle θ using the coordinates:
sin(θ) = y/r = -19/181
cos(θ) = x/r = 180/181
tan(θ) = y/x = -19/180
So, given that the point (180, -19) is on the terminal side of the angle θ, the exact values of the trigonometric functions are sin(θ) = -19/181, cos(θ) = 180/181, and tan(θ) = -19/180.

Learn more about exact value here, https://brainly.com/question/30695546

#SPJ11

The number of penguins in the water as; 7 penguins. The total number of penguins as; 21 penguins

Since solving real-life cases with the use of arithmetic operations.

Let we are given: There are 14 penguins on the ice.

Half, as many are swimming, implies that: 7 of them are swimming

Thus, the number of penguins in water = 7 penguins

The total number of penguins overall = penguins in water + penguins on the ice

The total number of penguins overall = 7 + 14

The total number of penguins overall = 21 penguins

Learn more about word problems here:

brainly.com/question/25693822

#SPJ1

The orthonormal basis for W is {u_1, u_2, {1, 0, -2}}.

To find an orthonormal basis for W, we first need to normalize the given vectors v_1 and v_2 by dividing each by their magnitude.

The magnitude of v_1 is sqrt(3^2 + (-5)^2 + 6^2) = sqrt(70), so the normalized vector u_1 is (3/sqrt(70), -5/sqrt(70), 6/sqrt(70)).

Similarly, the magnitude of v_2 is sqrt((3/2)² + (9/2)² + 3^2) = 3sqrt(2), so the normalized vector u_2 is (3/2sqrt(2), 9/2sqrt(2), 3/sqrt(2)).

Now, to check if u_1 and u_2 are orthogonal, we take their dot product, which is (3/sqrt(70))*(3/2sqrt(2)) + (-5/sqrt(70))*(9/2sqrt(2)) + (6/sqrt(70))*(3/sqrt(2)) = 0. Therefore, u_1 and u_2 are indeed orthogonal.

Finally, we can verify that the vector {1, 0, -2} is also orthogonal to both u_1 and u_2.

Thus, the orthonormal basis for W is {u_1, u_2, {1, 0, -2}}.

Learn more about orthogonal at

https://brainly.com/question/2292926

#SPJ11

According to quadratic equations, the travelling time of each ball is, respectively:

Case 7: t = 3.203 s.

Case 8: t = 4.763 s.

In this problem we find two word problems involving a ball travelling in the air, whose motion equation is described by a quadratic equation:

h = - 16 · t² + v · t + c

Where:

Travelling time can be found by following conditions: (h = 0)

- 16 · t² + v · t + c = 0

t = v / 32 ± (1 / 32) · √(v² + 64 · c), where t > 0.

Now we proceed to determine the resulting time:

Case 7: (v = 50 ft / s, c = 4 ft)

t = 50 / 32 ± (1 / 32) · √(50² + 64 · 4)

t = 3.203 s.

Case 8: (v = 76 ft / s, c = 1 ft)

t = 76 / 32 ± (1 / 32) · √(76² + 64 · 1)

t = 4.763 s.

To learn more on quadratic equation: https://brainly.com/question/1863222

#SPJ1

Working together, Aubrey and Maxwell can finish washing all the windows of the retail store in approximately 3.6 hours.

Aubrey's rate of work is 1 window per 6 hours, while Maxwell's rate of work is 1 window per 9 hours. To determine how long it would take for them to finish the work together, we need to calculate their combined rate of work.
Let's assume the total number of windows in the retail store is W. Since Aubrey can wash all the windows in 6 hours, their combined rate of work is W/6 windows per hour. Similarly, Maxwell's rate of work is W/9 windows per hour.
When working together, their rates of work are additive. Therefore, their combined rate of work is (W/6 + W/9) windows per hour.
To find the time it takes to complete the work, we divide the total number of windows by the combined rate of work. This can be expressed as:
Time = Total number of windows / Combined rate of work.
Time = W / (W/6 + W/9)
Simplifying the expression, we get:
Time = 1 / (1/6 + 1/9)
Time = 1 / (3/18 + 2/18) hourshours/18) hours.
Time = 1 / (5/18) hours.
Time ≈ 3.6 hours
Therefore, working together, Aubrey and Maxwell can finish washing all the windows of the retail store in approximately 3.6 hours.

Learn more about approximately here
https://brainly.com/question/16315366

 #SPJ11

The missing digit (x) in the pattern is 3 in the second column and 4 in the fourth row. The completed pattern is as follows:

3 2 4 8

7 2 1 3

8 4 3 5

4 3 6 9

To find the missing digit (x) in the given pattern, let's examine the columns and rows to identify any patterns.

Looking at the columns, we can see that the digits in the second column are increasing by 1 each time: 2, 4, x, 3. Therefore, the missing digit (x) must be 2 + 1 = 3.

Similarly, observing the rows, we notice that the digits in the fourth row are decreasing by 1 each time: 8, 5, x, 9. Thus, the missing digit (x) must be 5 - 1 = 4.

Therefore, the missing digit (x) in the pattern is 3 in the second column and 4 in the fourth row. The completed pattern is as follows:

3 2 4 8

7 2 1 3

8 4 3 5

4 3 6 9

Learn more about pattern at https://brainly.com/question/28580633

#SPJ1